pupillometry

瞳孔测量
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    瞳孔测量已用于姿势控制的研究中,以评估双重任务期间的认知负荷,但是它对平衡任务强度增加的反应尚未得到研究。此外,目前尚不清楚瞳孔直径的侧特异性变化是否与更苛刻的平衡任务一起发生,从而为姿势控制提供更多见解.这项研究的两个目的是分析强度增加的平衡任务之间稳态瞳孔直径的差异,并确定是否存在特定的变化。48名健康受试者在有和没有泡沫的力板上进行平行和左右单腿姿势,并使用移动式红外眼睛跟踪器测量左右瞳孔直径。参数平衡任务之间的差异(每只眼睛的平均瞳孔直径,两个瞳孔直径的平均值和左右瞳孔直径之间的差异)使用双向重复测量方差分析进行分析,和深度学习神经网络模型被用来研究瞳孔测量如何预测每个平衡任务。左眼的瞳孔直径,两只眼睛的平均瞳孔直径和瞳孔直径的差异从更简单到更苛刻的平衡任务在统计学上显着增加,这对左眼来说更明显。深度学习神经网络模型揭示了瞳孔直径的侧面特定变化,以及更苛刻的平衡任务。这项研究证实了瞳孔对平衡任务强度增加的反应,并指出了特定于侧面的瞳孔反应,这可能与特定于任务的更高水平的姿势控制有关。
    Pupillometry has been used in the studies of postural control to assess cognitive load during dual tasks, but its response to increased balance task intensity has not been investigated. Furthermore, it is unknown whether side-specific changes in pupil diameter occur with more demanding balance tasks providing additional insights into postural control. The two aims of this study were to analyze differences in steady-state pupil diameter between balance tasks with increased intensity and to determine whether there are side-specific changes. Forty-eight healthy subjects performed parallel and left and right one-legged stances on a force plate with and without foam with right and left pupil diameters measured with a mobile infrared eye-tracker. Differences between balance tasks in parameters (average pupil diameter of each eye, average of both pupil diameters and the difference between the left and right pupil diameter) were analyzed using a two-way repeated measures analysis of variance, and deep learning neural network models were used to investigate how pupillometry predicted each balance task. The pupil diameter of the left eye, the average pupil diameter of both eyes and the difference in pupil diameters increased statistically significantly from simpler to more demanding balance tasks, with this being more pronounced for the left eye. The deep learning neural network models revealed side-specific changes in pupil diameter with more demanding balance tasks. This study confirms pupillary responses to increased intensity of balance task and indicates side-specific pupil responses that could be related to task-specific involvement of higher levels of postural control.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    已经提出了经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)以提高注意力的一种机制是通过经皮刺激颅神经。从而激活蓝斑(LC)。具体来说,将电极放置在额骨和乳突上被认为有助于电流流过面部作为最小电阻的路径。面部受三叉神经支配,三叉神经与LC相连.在这项研究中,我们测试了刺激三叉神经是否会影响持续注意力任务的LC活动和表现指数。我们复制了以前的研究,这些研究表明任务绩效下降,与任务无关的想法的比率增加,以及由于任务时间而降低的瞳孔反应,而与tDCS条件无关(假,阳极,和阴极刺激)。重要的是,tDCS不影响瞳孔动力学(试验前或刺激诱发),自我报告的注意力状态,在主动刺激和假刺激条件下也没有任务表现。这里报道的发现与关于唤醒的理论一致,该理论集中在以瞳孔大小为索引的LC活动之间的假设联系上,任务性能,和自我报告的注意力状态,但未能支持三叉神经上的tDCS影响LC功能指数的假设。
    One mechanism by which transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been proposed to improve attention is by transcutaneous stimulation of cranial nerves, thereby activating the locus coeruleus (LC). Specifically, placement of the electrodes over the frontal bone and mastoid is thought to facilitate current flow across the face as a path of least resistance. The face is innervated by the trigeminal nerve, and the trigeminal nerve is interconnected with the LC. In this study, we tested whether stimulating the trigeminal nerve impacts indices of LC activity and performance on a sustained attention task. We replicated previous research that shows deterioration in task performance, increases in the rate of task-unrelated thoughts, and reduced pupil responses due to time on task irrespective of tDCS condition (sham, anodal, and cathodal stimulation). Importantly, tDCS did not influence pupil dynamics (pretrial or stimulus-evoked), self-reported attention state, nor task performance in active versus sham stimulation conditions. The findings reported here are consistent with theories about arousal centered on a hypothesized link between LC activity indexed by pupil size, task performance, and self-reported attention state but fail to support hypotheses that tDCS over the trigeminal nerve influences indices of LC function.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    咖啡因是一种广泛使用的药物,广泛影响人类的认知和大脑功能。咖啡因是大脑中腺苷受体的拮抗剂。以前的轶事报道也将咖啡因摄入量与瞳孔直径的变化联系起来。通过修改视网膜辐照度,瞳孔直径调节与视觉相关的所有眼部曝光(即感知,视觉刺激的检测和辨别)和非视觉(即,昼夜节律)功能。迄今为止,咖啡因对瞳孔结局的影响程度,包括瞳孔直径,尚未在系统审查中进行审查。我们遵循PRISMA-P指南,在预先注册的协议中进行了系统审查。我们只包括与人类参与者一起写的英文报告研究的原创研究文章,服用咖啡因,用客观方法测量瞳孔直径。使用广泛的搜索策略,我们查阅了各种数据库(PsycINFO,Medline,Embase,科克伦图书馆,bioRxiv和medRxiv),并使用Covidence平台进行筛选,回顾和提取研究数据。导入通过数据库搜索确定的研究后(n=517导入,n=46个重复),我们筛选了标题和摘要(n=471),发现14项研究符合我们的资格标准。经过全文审查,我们排除了七项研究,仅留下非常少量的纳入研究(n=7)。信息提取表明,现有文献中关于咖啡因对瞳孔参数的影响是非常不均匀的,学生评估方法不同,每天服用咖啡因的时间,剂量,以及协议时序和设计。文献中的证据没有提供一致的结果,但通过质量评估被评为有效的研究表明,咖啡因对瞳孔参数的影响很小。我们将数值结果总结为绝对瞳孔直径和效果大小的差异。需要使用现代学生评估方法进行更多研究,稳健的研究设计,和咖啡因剂量反应方法。
    Caffeine is a widely used drug that broadly affects human cognition and brain function. Caffeine acts as an antagonist to the adenosine receptors in the brain. Previous anecdotal reports have also linked caffeine intake with changes in pupil diameter. By modifying the retinal irradiance, pupil diameter modulates all ocular light exposure relevant for visual (i.e., perception, detection and discrimination of visual stimuli) and non-visual (i.e., circadian) functions. To date, the extent of the influence of caffeine on pupillary outcomes, including pupil diameter, has not been examined in a systematic review. We implemented a systematic review laid out in a pre-registered protocol following PRISMA-P guidelines. We only included original research articles written in English reporting studies with human participants, in which caffeine was administered, and pupil diameter was measured using objective methods. Using broad search strategies, we consulted various databases (PsycINFO, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, bioRxiv and medRxiv) and used the Covidence platform to screen, review and extract data from studies. After importing studies identified through database search (n = 517 imported, n = 46 duplicates), we screened the title and abstracts (n = 471), finding 14 studies meeting our eligibility criteria. After full-text review, we excluded seven studies, leaving only a very modest number of included studies (n = 7). Extraction of information revealed that the existing literature on the effect of caffeine on pupil parameters is very heterogeneous, differing in pupil assessment methods, time of day of caffeine administration, dose, and protocol timing and design. The evidence available in the literature does not provide consistent results but studies rated as valid by quality assessment suggest a small effect of caffeine on pupil parameters. We summarize the numeric results as both differences in absolute pupil diameter and in terms of effect sizes. More studies are needed using modern pupil assessment methods, robust study design, and caffeine dose-response methodology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究调查了两种不同光强度对疼痛调节的瞳孔光反应(PLR)的影响。此外,它旨在证明副交感神经和交感神经对疼痛反应的PLR参数的影响,正如功能模型所预测的那样。
    共有24名参与者被纳入随机分组,重复措施设计。在两个测试循环内响应于暗光和亮光刺激测量PLR。使用冷加压试验(CPT)诱发疼痛,其中包括将参与者的脚浸入冰水中。在每个测试周期内的基线和冰水浸没期间进行PLR测量。评估的PLR参数包括初始直径(INIT),延迟(LAT),振幅(AMP),和再扩张时间(ReDIL25)。除了这些参数,还计算并分析了心率(HR)和疼痛评分.
    CPT导致参与者中度疼痛,并且发现所得的PLR参数与预期的副交感神经和交感神经系统活动一致。尽管刺激的亮度确实会影响PLR参数,未发现与疼痛暴露的相互作用.
    结果显示,个体所经历的不同方面的疼痛,通过交感神经和副交感神经系统调节,在他们对光的瞳孔反应中可见。值得注意的是,在当前研究使用的范围内,光照强度对疼痛相关PLR效应无显著影响.
    UNASSIGNED: The present study investigated the impact of two different light intensities on the pain-modulated pupillary light response (PLR). Additionally, it aimed to demonstrate parasympathetic and sympathetic influences on PLR parameters in response to pain, as predicted by functional models.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 24 participants were included in a randomized, repeated-measures design. The PLR was measured in response to both dark and bright light stimuli within two test cycles. Pain was induced using the cold pressor test (CPT), which involved immersing participants\' feet in ice water. PLR measurements were taken during baseline and ice-water immersion within each test cycle. The assessed PLR parameters included initial diameter (INIT), latency (LAT), amplitude (AMP), and re-dilation time (ReDIL25). Along with these parameters, heart rate (HR) and pain ratings were also computed and analyzed.
    UNASSIGNED: The CPT caused moderate pain in participants, and the resulting PLR parameters were found to be congruent with the expected parasympathetic and sympathetic nervous system activities. Although the luminance of the stimulus did influence PLR parameters, no interaction with pain exposure was found.
    UNASSIGNED: The results showed that different aspects of pain experienced by an individual, as modulated through the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems, are visible in their pupillary reactions to light. Notably, within the range used in the current study, light intensity did not significantly affect the pain-related PLR effects.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在这篇文章中,我们回顾了对狗(犬熟悉)的眼动追踪研究,有三个目标;我们强调了使用眼动追踪在犬的感知和认知领域取得的成就,然后讨论在人类心理物理学中开发的技术的应用中出现的挑战,最后提出了狗眼追踪研究的新途径。对于第一个目标,我们目前的研究调查了狗对人类的感知,主要是面孔,还有手,gaze,情感,通信信号,以目标为导向的运动,和社会互动,以及对代表可能和不可能的物理过程和动画线索的动画的感知。然后,我们讨论目前对狗进行眼动追踪的挑战,比如可疑的图片-物体对等,广泛的培训,小样本量,困难的校准,和人工刺激和设置。我们建议对这些问题进行可能的改进和解决方案,以实现更好的刺激和数据质量。最后,我们建议使用动态刺激,瞳孔测量,到达时间分析,移动眼动追踪,并与行为和神经影像学方法相结合,以进一步推进犬的研究,并在这一高度动态的比较认知分支中开辟新的科学领域。
    In this article, we review eye-tracking studies with dogs (Canis familiaris) with a threefold goal; we highlight the achievements in the field of canine perception and cognition using eye tracking, then discuss the challenges that arise in the application of a technology that has been developed in human psychophysics, and finally propose new avenues in dog eye-tracking research. For the first goal, we present studies that investigated dogs\' perception of humans, mainly faces, but also hands, gaze, emotions, communicative signals, goal-directed movements, and social interactions, as well as the perception of animations representing possible and impossible physical processes and animacy cues. We then discuss the present challenges of eye tracking with dogs, like doubtful picture-object equivalence, extensive training, small sample sizes, difficult calibration, and artificial stimuli and settings. We suggest possible improvements and solutions for these problems in order to achieve better stimulus and data quality. Finally, we propose the use of dynamic stimuli, pupillometry, arrival time analyses, mobile eye tracking, and combinations with behavioral and neuroimaging methods to further advance canine research and open up new scientific fields in this highly dynamic branch of comparative cognition.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    瞳孔测量法用于人类监测疼痛,痛觉和镇痛。这个单一中心,非随机化,非盲干预试验,评估了清醒时鼻子抽搐对瞳孔大小的影响,镇静剂,和麻醉的马。在14匹无疼痛的成年清醒马(T0)鼻子抽搐之前(Be)和之后(Af)测量瞳孔高度(H)和长度(L)。计算变异百分比(PSV)(PSVTn=[(TnAf-TnBe)/TnBe]*100)。在乙酰丙嗪(0.04mgkg-1IV)(T1)后重复测量(Tn),罗米替丁(0.04mgkg-1IV)(T2),吗啡(0.1mgkg-1IV)(T3),在用地西泮(0.05mgkg-1IV)和氯胺酮(2.2mgkg-1IV)麻醉诱导后,在马被放置在手术台上(T4)和七氟烷的呼气分数为2%(T5)时。HAfvs.HBe,LAfvs.LBe以及PSVH与将每次的PSVL与Mann-WhitneyWilcoxon检验进行比较。PSVL和PSVH,以及HBe和LBe随时间的变化与Skillings-Mack检验进行比较,然后对配对数据进行Wilcoxon检验,以进行成对比较(Tn1与Tn)。在非镇静剂马(T0)中,鼻子抽搐的应用导致瞳孔长度显着增加(LT0Be:17.09[16.05;19.67]mm与LT0Af:19.52[18.74;21.40])mm(p=0.004)。乙酰丙嗪给药后30分钟(T1),鼻子抽搐导致瞳孔长度(LT1Be:16.45[14.80;18.66]mm对LT1Af18.31[17.20;20.52]mm)(p=0.016)和高度(HT1Be:8.44[5.68;12.04]mm对HT1Af:11.09[7.97;14.3]mm)(p<0.001)。PSVHT1显著大于PSVLT1(p=0.025)。T1时的PSVH高于T0时的PSVH(p=0.04)。它在T1也显著高于在T2(p<0.001)。Romifidine诱导的散瞳(HT2Be16.95[14.73;18.77]mm对HT1Be8.44[5.68;12.04]mm)(p<0,001)(LT2Be19.66[18.45;20.41]mm对LT1Be16.45[14.80;18.66]mm)(p<0.001)。结果表明,鼻子抽搐会引起清醒马的瞳孔扩张。这种作用在施用乙酰丙嗪后增强,但在施用罗米维汀后消失。
    Pupillometry is used in humans to monitor pain, nociception and analgesia. This single-center, non-randomized, non-blinded intervention trial, evaluated the effect of nose twitching on the pupil size in awake, sedated, and anesthetized horses. Pupil height (H) and length (L) were measured before (Be) and after (Af) nose twitching in fourteen non-painful adult awake horses (T0). The percentage of variation (PSV) was calculated (PSVTn = [(TnAf-TnBe)/TnBe]*100). Measurements were repeated (Tn) after acepromazine (0.04 mg kg-1 IV) (T1), romifidine (0.04 mg kg-1 IV) (T2), morphine (0.1 mg kg-1 IV) (T3), after anesthesia induction with diazepam (0.05 mg kg-1 IV) and ketamine (2.2 mg kg-1 IV), at the time the horse was placed on the operating table (T4) and when the expiratory fraction of sevoflurane was 2% (T5). HAf vs. HBe, LAf vs. LBe as well as PSVH vs. PSVL at each time were compared with a Mann-Whitney Wilcoxon test. The PSVL and PSVH, as well as HBe and LBe over time were compared with the Skillings-Mack test followed by a Wilcoxon test for paired data to make pairwise comparisons (Tn + 1 vs. Tn). In non-sedated horses (T0), the application of the nose twitch induced a significant increase in pupil length (LT0Be: 17.09 [16.05; 19.67] mm versus LT0Af: 19.52 [18.74; 21.40]) mm (p = 0.004). Thirty minutes after acepromazine administration (T1), nose twitching induced a significant increase in pupil length (LT1Be: 16.45 [14.80; 18.66] mm versus LT1Af 18.31 [17.20; 20.52] mm) (p = 0.016) and height (HT1Be: 8.44 [5.68; 12.04] mm versus HT1Af: 11.09 [7.97; 14.3] mm) (p < 0.001). PSVHT1 was significantly greater than PSVLT1 (p = 0.025). PSVH was higher at T1 than at T0 (p = 0.04). It was also significantly higher at T1 than at T2 (p < 0.001). Romifidine induced mydriasis (HT2Be 16.95 [14.73; 18.77] mm versus HT1Be 8.44 [5.68; 12.04] mm) (p < 0,001) (LT2Be 19.66 [18.45; 20.41] mm versus LT1Be 16.45 [14.80; 18.66] mm) (p < 0.001). The results suggest that nose twitching induced a pupillary dilation in the awake horse. This effect was potentiated after the administration of acepromazine but disappeared after the administration of romifidine.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    疼痛的负面影响是动物手术管理中持续关注的问题,导致寻找新药或更有效的镇痛方案来控制这种负面情绪。这项研究旨在评估在异氟烷麻醉下进行选择性卵巢子宫切除术(OVH)的雌性犬中,单独使用大麻二酚(CBD)和美洛昔康联合使用红外瞳孔测定法的伤害性反应。包括总共60只不同品种的雌性狗。根据治疗将这些狗随机分配到四个研究组:接受盐水溶液的对照组(G0:n=15);预先用剂量为0.2mg/kg-1IV的美洛昔康给药的组(GMelox:n=15)。术后该药物每24小时以0.1mgKg-1IV使用;术前口服剂量为2mgKg-1的CBD治疗组(GCBD:n=15)。术后每12小时给药;该组术前服用美洛昔康和CBD(GMelox/CBD:n=15)美洛昔康联合用药,剂量为0.2mgKg-1IV,术后静脉注射0.1mgKg-1。术前口服2mgKg-1剂量的CBD,术后每12小时。术后48小时给予治疗。OVH之后,瞳孔神经指数,瞳孔大小,最小直径(MIN),百分比变化,收缩延迟(Lat),收缩速度,和最大收缩速度记录为事件期间双眼的瞳孔测量变量(E):基线(给药前30分钟),E30分钟,E1h,E2h,E3h,E4h,E8h,E12h,E24h,E48h格拉斯哥综合测量疼痛量表(GCMPS-SF)的简短形式用于评估相同事件期间的疼痛。总的来说,据观察,瞳孔测量变量大小,分钟.,还有Lat.在E30分钟内,G0显著高于其他组,E1h,和E2h(p=0.03),表明G0动物瞳孔扩张更大。此外,GCMPS-SF与GMelox之间无统计学差异,GCBD,和GMelox/CBD在术后期间(p>0.05)。相比之下,与G0相比,得分有统计学差异(p=0.00001),该组中的所有动物在手术后2小时接受抢救镇痛。根据瞳孔测量和GCMPS-SF量表的评分,据观察,大麻二酚单药治疗与美洛昔康单药或与大麻二酚联合治疗犬急性疼痛具有相似的镇痛效果.同样,这些发现表明,红外瞳孔测量可能是识别狗急性疼痛的工具。
    The negative effects of pain are a constant concern in the surgical management of animals, leading to the search for new drugs or more effective analgesic protocols to control this negative emotion. This study aimed to evaluate the nociceptive response of cannabidiol (CBD) alone and in combination with meloxicam using infrared pupillometry in female dogs undergoing elective ovariohysterectomy (OVH) under isoflurane anesthesia. A total of 60 female dogs of different breeds were included. These dogs were randomly assigned to four study groups according to the treatment: Control Group (G0: n = 15) receiving saline solution; group premedicated with meloxicam at a dose of 0.2 mg Kg-1 IV (GMelox: n = 15). Postoperatively this drug was used at 0.1 mg Kg-1 IV every 24 h; the CBD-treated Group (GCBD: n = 15) at a dose of 2 mg Kg-1 orally in the preoperative. Postoperatively was administrated every 12 h; and the Group premedicated with the combination of meloxicam and CBD (GMelox/CBD: n = 15) Meloxicam at a dose of 0.2 mg Kg-1 IV preoperatively, and 0.1 mg Kg-1 IV during the postoperative. CBD at a dose of 2 mg Kg-1 orally in the preoperative, and every 12 h in the postoperative. Treatments were administered for 48 postoperative hours. After OVH, the pupillary neurologic index, pupillary size, minimum diameter (MIN), percentage change, constriction latency (Lat), constriction velocity, and maximum constriction velocity were recorded as pupillometric variables in both eyes during events (E): Baseline (30 min before drug administration), E30 min, E1h, E2h, E3h, E4h, E8h, E12h, E24h, and E48h. The Short-Form of the Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale (GCMPS-SF) was used to assess pain during the same events. Overall, it was observed that the pupillometric variables Size, MIN., and Lat. were significantly higher in G0 compared to the other groups during E30 min, E1h, and E2h (p = 0.03), indicating greater pupil dilation in G0 animals. Additionally, no statistically significant differences were observed in GCMPS-SF between GMelox, GCBD, and GMelox/CBD during the postoperative period (p > 0.05). In contrast, the scores were statistically different compared to G0 (p = 0.00001), where all animals in this group received rescue analgesia at 2 h post-surgery. According to pupillometry and scores on the GCMPS-SF scale, it was observed that monotherapy with cannabidiol provides a similar analgesic effect to meloxicam alone or in combination with cannabidiol to manage acute pain in dogs. Similarly, these findings suggest that infrared pupillometry could be a tool for recognizing acute pain in dogs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    如今,博物馆大量使用数字资料(例如,虚拟旅游)来吸引游客。因此,值得调查哪些变量会影响博物馆外艺术的参与,以及艺术品的数字复制品在产生令人满意的审美体验方面是否与博物馆原件一样有效。
    在这里,我们测试了在计算机屏幕上呈现的当代绘画的艺术享受中引入其他信息材料的有效性。在观看艺术品之前,幼稚的观察者会接触到基本的描述性标签。我们取代了传统的测量方法——观看时间和问卷,使用生物特征参数-瞳孔反应,眼球运动,心率,和皮肤电活动。然后将结果与我们以前采用相同实验范式的博物馆研究进行比较。
    我们的行为和心理生理数据导致了复杂的结果模式。正如在博物馆环境中发现的那样,提供详细的描述降低了复杂性,唤起更多积极的感觉,并引起瞳孔扩张,但不会增强审美。这些结果表明,信息标签可以改善理解和情绪,但在两种情况下对艺术品的享乐评估的影响有限。然而,其他结果并不反映在博物馆中发现的结果;在实验室环境中,参与者花费相似的时间,有类似的凝视行为,当观看带有不同类型标签的艺术品时,它们的皮肤电活动和心率不会改变。实验室和博物馆设置之间的主要区别是观看数字复制品的时间较短。真实的绘画,虽然主观评级(例如,喜欢,兴趣)是可比的。
    总的来说,这项研究表明,环境语境确实会影响审美体验;尽管,通过博物馆外的数字媒体也可以了解在伴随艺术品的标签中引入额外相关内容的一些有益效果。
    UNASSIGNED: Nowadays museums make large use of digital materials (e.g., virtual tours) to attract visitors. Therefore, it is worthwhile investigating which variables affect the engagement with art outside the museum, and whether digital reproductions of artworks are as effective as museum originals in producing a satisfying aesthetic experience.
    UNASSIGNED: Here we tested the effectiveness of introducing additional informative materials on the artistic enjoyment of contemporary paintings presented on a computer screen. Naïve observers were exposed to essential and descriptive labels before viewing artworks. We flanked traditional measurement methods - viewing times and questionnaires, with biometric parameters - pupil responses, eye movements, heart rate, and electrodermal activity. The results were then compared to our previous museum study that adopted the same experimental paradigm.
    UNASSIGNED: Our behavioral and psychophysiological data lead to a complex pattern of results. As found in the museum setting, providing detailed descriptions decreases complexity, evokes more positive sensations, and induces pupil dilation but does not enhance aesthetic appreciation. These results suggested that informative labels improve understanding and emotions but have a limited impact on the hedonic evaluation of artworks in both contexts. However, other results do not mirror those found in the museum; in the laboratory setting, participants spend a similar amount of time, have a comparable gaze behavior, and their electrodermal activity and heart rate do not change when viewing artworks with different types of labels. The main difference between the lab and museum settings is the shorter time spent viewing digital reproductions vs. real paintings, although subjective ratings (e.g., liking, interest) are comparable.
    UNASSIGNED: Overall, this study indicates that the environmental context does impact the aesthetic experience; although, some beneficial effects of introducing additional relevant content in labels accompanying artworks can also be acquainted through digital media outside of the museum.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    保持平衡对健康人来说很自然。在患有前庭病的受试者中,即使得到补偿,尤其是如果是双边的,保持平衡需要认知努力。瞳孔测量是一种量化认知努力的既定方法。背景/目标:我们假设瞳孔测量能够在日益困难的条件下捕获双侧前庭病患者维持姿势所需的更多努力。此外,我们假设在平衡任务期间的认知工作量,按瞳孔大小索引,会随着BionicVEST耳蜗前庭植入物的激活而降低。方法:招募截至2023年3月接受耳蜗前庭植入物的受试者,排除那些排除瞳孔测量的眼科问题。使用经过验证的改良的视频眼震描记术系统进行瞳孔测量。在记录瞳孔的同时,进行了计算机动态姿势造影和改良的平衡感觉统合临床测试。首先在停用植入物的前庭组件24小时后进行测试。此后,它被重新激活,休息1小时后,重复测试。使用定制软件处理瞳孔记录,并计算平均相对瞳孔直径(MRPD)。结果:前庭植入物活动时,MRPD平均减少10.7%至24.2%,在中等难度的任务中看到更大的效果,当任务很容易或很困难时,效果较小。结论:尽管存在技术挑战,瞳孔测量法似乎是一种有前途的方法,可以量化前庭植入前后双侧前庭病变患者维持姿势所需的认知努力。
    Maintaining balance comes naturally to healthy people. In subjects with vestibulopathy, even when compensated, and especially if it is bilateral, maintaining balance requires cognitive effort. Pupillometry is an established method of quantifying cognitive effort. Background/Objectives: We hypothesized that pupillometry would be able to capture the increased effort required to maintain posture in subjects with bilateral vestibulopathy in increasingly difficult conditions. Additionally, we hypothesized that the cognitive workload during balance tasks, indexed by pupil size, would decrease with the activation of the BionicVEST cochleo-vestibular implants. Methods: Subjects with a cochleo-vestibular implant as of March 2023 were recruited, excluding those with ophthalmological issues that precluded pupillometry. Pupillometry was performed using a validated modified videonystagmography system. Computed dynamic posturography and a Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Integration on Balance were performed while the pupil was recorded. Tests were first performed after 24 h of deactivating the vestibular component of the implant. Thereafter, it was reactivated, and after 1 h of rest, the tests were repeated. The pupil recording was processed using custom software and the mean relative pupil diameter (MRPD) was calculated. Results: There was an average of 10.7% to 24.2% reduction in MRPD when the vestibular implant was active, with a greater effect seen in tasks of moderate difficulty, and lesser effect when the task was easy or of great difficulty. Conclusions: Despite technical challenges, pupillometry appears to be a promising method of quantifying the cognitive effort required for maintaining posture in subjects with bilateral vestibulopathy before and after vestibular implantation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:环境光(PUAL)中的瞳孔不稳描述了在正常情况下观察到的瞳孔直径的波动,在典型的室内光线下清醒的受试者。在阿片类药物中毒期间,年轻健康受试者的PUAL变得低到不存在。我们试图在门诊参与者的随机样本中确定PUAL值的年龄相关分布。
    方法:招募年龄≥18岁的受试者。全部按年龄范围(18-29、30-49、50-69和≥70)确定,并调查了糖尿病,β受体阻滞剂的使用,以及之前使用24小时阿片类药物。平均PUAL之间的关系,年龄组,合并症和阿片类药物的使用通过KruskalWallis测试进行检查,和PUAL,并使用逐步多级线性回归进行建模,包括糖尿病,β受体阻滞剂的使用,在使用阿片类药物24小时之前,自主神经功能障碍,瞳孔直径为固定效应,受试者为随机效应。
    结果:在150名受试者中,17例报告糖尿病,12报告使用β受体阻滞剂,14之前报告的24小时阿片类药物使用,120人报告没有合并症。PUAL在较高年龄类别中下降(0.0307,P<0.001),糖尿病患者(0.0481,P=0.025),和β受体阻滞剂的使用(由0.0616,P=0.005)。观察到阿片类药物相关的PUAL下降,但统计显著性因模型而异。在健康的受试者中,根据接受阿片类药物输注的健康受试者以前的数据,PUAL值没有落在表明阿片类药物毒性可能性高的范围内.
    结论:PUAL在高年龄组有所下降,糖尿病和β受体阻滞剂的使用,与自主神经功能受损相关的疾病,和阿片类药物的使用,但意义取决于所选择的模型。
    BACKGROUND: Pupillary unrest in ambient light (PUAL) describes the fluctuation of pupil diameter observed in normal, awake subjects under typical levels of indoor light. PUAL becomes low to absent in young healthy subjects during opioid intoxication. We sought to determine the age-related distribution of PUAL values in a random sample of ambulatory participants.
    METHODS: Subjects ≥18 years of age were recruited. All were identified by age range (18-29, 30-49, 50-69, and ≥70), and surveyed for diabetes, beta-blocker use, and prior 24-hour opioid use. Relationship between mean PUAL, age group, comorbidity and opioid use were examined by Kruskal Wallis test, and PUAL and was modeled using stepwise multilevel linear regression, including diabetes, beta blocker use, prior 24-hour opioid use, autonomic dysfunction, and pupil diameter as fixed effects and subject as random effect.
    RESULTS: Among 150 subjects, 17 reported diabetes, 12 reported beta-blocker use, 14 reported prior 24-hour opioid use, and 120 reported no comorbid conditions. PUAL declined in higher age categories (by 0.0307, P < 0.001), with diabetes (by 0.0481, P = 0.025), and with beta-blocker use (by 0.0616, P = 0.005). Opioid related PUAL decline was observed, but statistical significance varied by model. Among healthy subjects, no PUAL value fell within range indicating high likelihood of opioid toxicity based on previous data from healthy subjects undergoing opioid infusion.
    CONCLUSIONS: PUAL declined in higher age groups, diabetes and beta-blocker use, conditions associated with impaired autonomic function, and with opioid use but significance varied depending on the chosen model.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号