OBJECTIVE: Historically, the perfusion-guided sequence suggests to first transplant the side with lowest lung perfusion. This sequence is thought to limit right ventricular afterload and prevent acute heart failure after first pneumonectomy. As a paradigm shift, we adopted the right-first implantation sequence, irrespective of lung perfusion. The right donor lung generally accommodates a larger proportion of the cardiac output. We hypothesized that the right-first sequence reduces the likelihood of oedema formation in the firstly transplanted graft during second-lung implantation. Our objective was to compare the perfusion-guided and right-first sequence for intraoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) need and primary graft dysfunction (PGD).
METHODS: A retrospective single-center cohort study (2008-2021) including double-lung transplant cases (N = 696) started without ECMO was performed. Primary end-points were intraoperative ECMO cannulation and PGD grade 3 (PGD3) at 72 h. Secondary end-points were patient and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD)-free survival. In cases with native left lung perfusion ≤50% propensity score adjusted comparison of the perfusion-guided and right-first sequence was performed.
RESULTS: When left lung perfusion was ≤50%, right-first implantation was done in 219 and left-first in 189 cases. Intraoperative escalation to ECMO support was observed in 10.96% of right-first vs 19.05% of left-first cases (odds ratio 0.448; 95% confidence interval 0.229-0.0.878; p = 0.0193). PGD3 at 72 h was observed in 8.02% of right-first vs 15.64% of left-first cases (0.566; 0.263-1.217; p = 0.1452). Right-first implantation did not affect patient or CLAD-free survival.
CONCLUSIONS: The right-first implantation sequence in off-pump double-lung transplantation reduces need for intraoperative ECMO cannulation with a trend towards less PGD grade 3.

Long-term outcome following lung transplantation remains one of the poorest of all solid organ transplants with a 1- and 5-year survival of 85% and 59% respectively for adult lung transplant recipients and with 50% of patients developing chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) in the first 5 years following transplant. Reducing the risk of inflammatory type primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is vital for improving both short-term survival following lung transplantation and long-term outcome due to the association of early inflammatory-mediated damage to the allograft and the risk of CLAD. PGD has a multifactorial aetiology and high-grade inflammatory-type PGD is the result of cumulative insults that may be incurred in one or more of the three variables of the transplantation continuum: the donor lungs, the recipient and intraoperative process. We set out a conceptual framework which uses a fully integrated approach to this transplant continuum to attempt to identify and, where possible, modify specific donor, recipient and intraoperative PGD risk with the goal of reducing inflammatory-type PGD risk for an individual recipient. We also consider the concept and risk-benefit of matching lung allografts and recipients on the basis of donor and recipient PGD-risk compatibility. The use of ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) and the extended preservation of lung allografts on EVLP will be explored as safe, non-injurious EVLP may enable extensive inflammatory testing of specific donor lungs and has the potential to provide a platform for targeted therapeutic interventions on lung allografts.

We present an unusual etiology of primary renal allograft dysfunction attributed to myeloma cast nephropathy in a patient with no history of multiple myeloma before kidney transplant. The patient, a 54-year-old woman, had been on hemodialysis for 6 months before transplant for presumed diabetic nephropathy; she developed graft dysfunction immediately after transplant. Graft biopsy specimens were consistent with myeloma cast nephropathy, and she was treated with bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone. She achieved a complete hematological response and regained excellent graft function 3 months after transplant. The patient then received autologous stem cell transplant 8 months after kidney transplant. To our knowledge, this is the second report of a successful graft outcome after chemotherapy and the first report treated with autologous stem cell transplantation after remission of monoclonal disease.

BACKGROUND: Lung transplantation is hindered by low donor lung utilization rates. Infectious complications are reasons to decline donor grafts due to fear of post-transplant primary graft dysfunction. Mesenchymal stem cells are a promising therapy currently investigated in treating lung injury. Full-term amniotic fluid-derived lung-specific mesenchymal stem cell treatment may regenerate damaged lungs. These cells have previously demonstrated inflammatory mediation in other respiratory diseases, and we hypothesized that treatment would improve donor lung quality and postoperative outcomes.
METHODS: In a transplantation model, donor pigs were stratified to either the treated or the nontreated group. Acute respiratory distress syndrome was induced in donor pigs and harvested lungs were placed on ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) before transplantation. Treatment consisted of 3 doses of 2 × 106 cells/kg: one during EVLP and 2 after transplantation. Donors and recipients were assessed on clinically relevant parameters and recipients were followed for 3 days before evaluation for primary graft dysfunction (PGD).
RESULTS: Repeated injection of the cell treatment showed reductions in inflammation seen through lowered immune cell counts, reduced histology signs of inflammation, and decreased cytokines in the plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Treated recipients showed improved pulmonary function, including increased PaO2/FiO2 ratios and reduced incidence of PGD.
CONCLUSIONS: Repeated injection of lung-specific cell treatment during EVLP and post transplant was associated with improved function of previously damaged lungs. Cell treatment may be considered as a potential therapy to increase the number of lungs available for transplantation and the improvement of postoperative outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Static cold storage (SCS) remains the gold standard for preserving donor hearts before transplantation but is associated with ischaemia, anaerobic metabolism, and organ injuries, leading to patient morbidity and mortality. We aimed to evaluate whether continuous, hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) of the donor heart is safe and superior compared with SCS.
METHODS: We performed a multinational, multicentre, randomised, controlled, open-label clinical trial with a superiority design at 15 transplant centres across eight European countries. Adult candidates for heart transplantation were eligible and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio. Donor inclusion criteria were age 18-70 years with no previous sternotomy and donation after brain death. In the treatment group, the preservation protocol involved the use of a portable machine perfusion system ensuring HOPE of the resting donor heart. The donor hearts in the control group underwent ischaemic SCS according to standard practices. The primary outcome was time to first event of a composite of either cardiac-related death, moderate or severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD) of the left ventricle, PGD of the right ventricle, acute cellular rejection at least grade 2R, or graft failure (with use of mechanical circulatory support or re-transplantation) within 30 days after transplantation. We included all patients who were randomly assigned, fulfilled inclusion and exclusion criteria, and received a transplant in the primary analysis and all patients who were randomly assigned and received a transplant in the safety analyses. This trial was registered with ClicalTrials.gov (NCT03991923) and is ongoing.
RESULTS: A total of 229 patients were enrolled between Nov 25, 2020, and May 19, 2023. The primary analysis population included 204 patients who received a transplant. There were no patients who received a transplant lost to follow-up. All 100 donor hearts preserved with HOPE were transplantable after perfusion. The primary endpoint was registered in 19 (19%) of 101 patients in the HOPE group and 31 (30%) of 103 patients in the SCS group, corresponding to a risk reduction of 44% (hazard ratio 0·56; 95% CI 0·32-0·99; log-rank test p=0·059). PGD was the primary outcome event in 11 (11%) patients in the HOPE group and 29 (28%) in the SCS group (risk ratio 0·39; 95% CI 0·20-0·73). In the HOPE group, 63 (65%) patients had a reported serious adverse event (158 events) versus 87 (70%; 222 events) in the SCS group. Major adverse cardiac transplant events were reported in 18 (18%) and 33 (32%) patients in the HOPE and SCS group (risk ratio 0·56; 95% CI 0·34-0·92).
CONCLUSIONS: Although there was not a significant difference in the primary endpoint, the 44% risk reduction associated with HOPE was suggested to be a clinically meaningful benefit. Post-transplant complications, measured as major adverse cardiac transplant events, were reduced. Analysis of secondary outcomes suggested that HOPE was beneficial in reducing primary graft dysfunction. HOPE in donor heart preservation addresses the existing challenges associated with graft preservation and the increasing complexity of donors and heart transplantation recipients. Future investigation will help to further elucidate the benefit of HOPE.
BACKGROUND: XVIVO Perfusion.

Background: Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) has detrimental effects on recipients following lung transplantation. Here, we determined the contemporary trends of PGD in a national database, factors associated with the development of PGD grade 3 (PGD3) and ex vivo lung perfusion\'s (EVLP) effect on this harmful postoperative complication. Methods: The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried from 2015 to 2023, and recipients were stratified into No-PGD, PGD1/2, or PGD3. The groups were analyzed with comparative statistics, and survival was determined with Kaplan-Meier methods. Multivariable Cox regression was used to determine factors associated with increased mortality. PGD3 recipients were then stratified based on EVLP use prior to transplantation, and a 3:1 propensity match was performed to determine outcomes following transplantation. Finally, logistic regression models based on select criteria were used to determine risk factors associated with the development of PGD3 and mortality within 1 year. Results: A total of 21.4% of patients were identified as having PGD3 following lung transplant. Those with PGD3 suffered significantly worse perioperative morbidity, mortality, and had worse long-term survival. PGD3 was also independently associated with increased mortality. Matched EVLP PGD3 recipients had significantly higher use of ECMO postoperatively; however, they did not suffer other significant morbidity or mortality as compared to PGD3 recipients without EVLP use. Importantly, EVLP use prior to transplantation was significantly associated with decreased likelihood of PGD3 development, while having no significant association with early mortality. Conclusions: EVLP is associated with decreased PGD3 development, and further optimization of this technology is necessary to expand the donor pool.

During the last few years, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has emerged as a possible non-invasive biomarker for prediction of complications after lung transplantation. We previously published a proof-of-concept study using a digital droplet polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR)-based method for detection of cfDNA. In the current study, we aimed to further evaluate the potential clinical usefulness of detecting chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) using three different ddPCR applications measuring and calculating the donor fraction (DF) of cfDNA as well as one method using the absolute amount of donor-derived cfDNA. We analyzed 246 serum samples collected from 26 lung transplant recipients. Nine of the patients had ongoing CLAD at some point during follow-up. All four methods showed statistically significant elevation of the measured variable in the CLAD samples compared to the non-CLAD samples. The results support the use of ddPCR-detected cfDNA as a potential biomarker for prediction of CLAD. These findings need to be validated in a subsequent prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to compare the prognosis of lung transplantation recipients based on donor age.
METHODS: A detailed search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for cohort studies on lung transplantation. The prognosis of lung transplant recipients was investigated based on the donor age, with the primary outcomes being 1-year overall survival (OS), 3-year OS, 5-year OS, and 5-year chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD)-free survival.
RESULTS: This meta-analysis included 10 cohort studies. Among the short-term outcomes, the older donor group demonstrated no significant difference from the young donor group in primary graft dysfunction within 72 hours, use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, length of ventilator use, and intensive care unit hours. However, a longer hospital stay was associated with the older donor group. In terms of long-term outcomes, no difference was found between the two groups in 1-year OS, 3-year OS, and 5-year OS. Notably, patients with older donors exhibited a superior 5-year CLAD-free survival.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this meta-analysis indicate that older donors are not inferior to younger donors in terms of long-term and short-term recipient outcomes. Lung transplantation using older donors is a potential therapeutic option after rigorous evaluation.

BACKGROUND: There is conflicting data on the association between pre-orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) amiodarone use and post-OHT graft dysfunction (GD) leading to heterogeneity in clinical practice.
METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate whether pre-OHT amiodarone use was associated with meaningful increases in the incidence of GD, 30-day mortality, and 1-year mortality. Studies were identified by searching PubMed and the Cochrane Register of Clinical Trials. The Mantel-Haenszel method was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI95) for each endpoint.
RESULTS: 17 retrospective studies were identified that included 48,782 patients. 14 studies (n = 48,018) reported GD as an outcome. Pre-OHT amiodarone use was associated with increased odds of GD (OR 1.3, CI95 1.2-1.5, p < 0.001). 10 studies (n = 45,875) reported 30-day mortality based on amiodarone use. Pre-OHT amiodarone use was associated with increased odds of 30-day mortality (OR 1.4, CI95 1.2-1.5, p < 0.001). 5 studies (n = 41,404) reported 1-year mortality based on amiodarone use. Pre-OHT amiodarone use was associated with increased odds of 1-year mortality (OR 1.2, CI95 1.1-1.4, p < 0.001). The increase in absolute risk of GD, 30-day mortality, and 1-year mortality for patients with pre-OHT amiodarone use was 1.3%, 1.2%, and 1.4%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Pre-OHT amiodarone exposure was associated with increased odds of GD, 30-day mortality, and 1-year mortality. The increase in absolute risk for each endpoint was modest, and it is unclear to what extent, if any, pre-OHT amiodarone use should influence assessment of OHT candidacy.

BACKGROUND: Lung ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI) is the principal cause of primary graft dysfunction (PGD) after lung transplantation, affecting short-term and long-term mortality post-transplantation. PANoptosis, a newly identified form of regulated cell death involving apoptosis, necroptosis, and pyroptosis, is now considered a possible cause of organ damage and IRI. However, the specific role of PANoptosis to the development of lung IRI following lung transplantation is still not fully understood.
METHODS: In this study, we identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) by analyzing the gene expression data from the GEO database related to lung IRI following lung transplantation. PANoptosis-IRI DEGs were determined based on the intersection of PANoptosis-related genes and screened DEGs. Hub genes associated with lung IRI were further screened using Lasso regression and the SVM-RFE algorithm. Additionally, the Cibersort algorithm was employed to assess immune cell infiltration and investigate the interaction between immune cells and hub genes. The upstream miRNAs that may regulate hub genes and compounds that may interact with hub genes were also analyzed. Moreover, an external dataset was utilized to validate the differential expression analysis of hub genes. Finally, the expressions of hub genes were ultimately confirmed using quantitative real-time PCR, western blotting, and immunohistochemistry in both animal models of lung IRI and lung transplant patients.
RESULTS: PANoptosis-related genes, specifically interferon regulatory factor 1 (IRF1) and interleukin 1 alpha (IL1A), have been identified as potential biomarkers for lung IRI following lung transplantation. In mouse models of lung IRI, both the mRNA and protein expression levels of IRF1 and IL1A were significantly elevated in lung tissues of the IRI group compared to the control group. Moreover, lung transplant recipients exhibited significantly higher protein levels of IRF1 and IL1A in PBMCs when compared to healthy controls. Patients who experienced PGD showed elevated levels of IRF1 and IL1A proteins in their blood samples. Furthermore, in patients undergoing lung transplantation, the protein levels of IRF1 and IL1A were notably increased in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) compared to healthy controls. In addition, patients who developed primary graft dysfunction (PGD) exhibited even higher protein levels of IRF1 and IL1A than those without PGD. Furthermore, PANoptosis was observed in the lung tissues of mouse models of lung IRI and in the PBMCs of patients who underwent lung transplantation.
CONCLUSIONS: Our research identified IRF1 and IL1A as biomarkers associated with PANoptosis in lung IRI, suggesting their potential utility as targets for diagnosing and therapeutically intervening in lung IRI and PGD following lung transplantation.