OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to compare the prognosis of lung transplantation recipients based on donor age.
METHODS: A detailed search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for cohort studies on lung transplantation. The prognosis of lung transplant recipients was investigated based on the donor age, with the primary outcomes being 1-year overall survival (OS), 3-year OS, 5-year OS, and 5-year chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD)-free survival.
RESULTS: This meta-analysis included 10 cohort studies. Among the short-term outcomes, the older donor group demonstrated no significant difference from the young donor group in primary graft dysfunction within 72 hours, use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, length of ventilator use, and intensive care unit hours. However, a longer hospital stay was associated with the older donor group. In terms of long-term outcomes, no difference was found between the two groups in 1-year OS, 3-year OS, and 5-year OS. Notably, patients with older donors exhibited a superior 5-year CLAD-free survival.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this meta-analysis indicate that older donors are not inferior to younger donors in terms of long-term and short-term recipient outcomes. Lung transplantation using older donors is a potential therapeutic option after rigorous evaluation.

BACKGROUND: There is conflicting data on the association between pre-orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) amiodarone use and post-OHT graft dysfunction (GD) leading to heterogeneity in clinical practice.
METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate whether pre-OHT amiodarone use was associated with meaningful increases in the incidence of GD, 30-day mortality, and 1-year mortality. Studies were identified by searching PubMed and the Cochrane Register of Clinical Trials. The Mantel-Haenszel method was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI95) for each endpoint.
RESULTS: 17 retrospective studies were identified that included 48,782 patients. 14 studies (n = 48,018) reported GD as an outcome. Pre-OHT amiodarone use was associated with increased odds of GD (OR 1.3, CI95 1.2-1.5, p < 0.001). 10 studies (n = 45,875) reported 30-day mortality based on amiodarone use. Pre-OHT amiodarone use was associated with increased odds of 30-day mortality (OR 1.4, CI95 1.2-1.5, p < 0.001). 5 studies (n = 41,404) reported 1-year mortality based on amiodarone use. Pre-OHT amiodarone use was associated with increased odds of 1-year mortality (OR 1.2, CI95 1.1-1.4, p < 0.001). The increase in absolute risk of GD, 30-day mortality, and 1-year mortality for patients with pre-OHT amiodarone use was 1.3%, 1.2%, and 1.4%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Pre-OHT amiodarone exposure was associated with increased odds of GD, 30-day mortality, and 1-year mortality. The increase in absolute risk for each endpoint was modest, and it is unclear to what extent, if any, pre-OHT amiodarone use should influence assessment of OHT candidacy.

Lung transplantation (LT) constitutes the last therapeutic option for selected patients with end-stage respiratory disease. Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a form of severe lung injury, occurring in the first 72 h following LT and constitutes the most common cause of early death after LT. The presence of pulmonary hypertension (PH) has been reported to favor PGD development, with a negative impact on patients\' outcomes while complicating medical management. Although several studies have suggested a potential association between pre-LT left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) and PGD occurrence, the underlying mechanisms of such an association remain elusive. Importantly, the heterogeneity of the study protocols and the various inclusion criteria used to define the diastolic dysfunction in those patients prevents solid conclusions from being drawn. In this review, we aim at summarizing PGD mechanisms, risk factors, and diagnostic criteria, with a further focus on the interplay between LVDD and PGD development. Finally, we explore the predictive value of several diastolic dysfunction diagnostic parameters to predict PGD occurrence and severity.

Provided advancements in Lung Transplantation (LT) survival, the efficacy of Lung Retransplantation (LRT) has often been debated. Decades of retrospective analyses on thousands of LRT cases provide insight enabling predictive patient criteria for retransplantation. This review used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The PubMed search engine was utilized for articles relating to LRT published through August 2023, and a systematic review was performed using Covidence software version 2.0 (Veritas Health Innovation, Australia). Careful patient selection is vital for successful LRT, and the benefit leans in favor of those in optimal health following their initial transplant. However, the lack of a standardized approach remains apparent. Through an in-depth review, we will address considerations such as chronic lung allograft dysfunction, timing to LRT, surgical and perioperative complexity, and critical ethical concerns that guide the current practice as it relates to this subset of patients for whom LRT is the only therapeutic option available.

Evidence from lung protective ventilation (LPV) in the acute respiratory distress syndrome has commonly been applied to guide periprocedural ventilation in lung transplantation. However, this approach may not adequately consider the distinctive features of respiratory failure and allograft physiology in the lung transplant recipient. This scoping review was conducted to systematically map the research describing ventilation and relevant physiological parameters post-bilateral lung transplantation with the aim to identify any associations with patient outcomes and gaps in the current knowledge base.
To identify relevant publications, comprehensive literature searches of electronic bibliographic databases were conducted with the guidance of an experienced librarian in MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS and the Cochrane Library. The search strategies were peer-reviewed using the PRESS (Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies) checklist. The reference lists of all relevant review articles were surveyed. Publications were included in the review if they described relevant ventilation parameters in the immediate post-operative period, published between 2000 and 2022 and involved human subjects undergoing bilateral lung transplantation. Publications were excluded if they included animal models, only single-lung transplant recipients or only patients managed with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
A total of 1212 articles were screened, 27 were subject to full-text review and 11 were included in the analysis. The quality of the included studies was assessed to be poor with no prospective multi-centre randomised controlled trials. The frequency of reported retrospective LPV parameters was as follows: tidal volume (82%), tidal volume indexed to both donor and recipient body weight (27%) and plateau pressure (18%). Data suggest that undersized grafts are at risk of unrecognised higher tidal volume ventilation indexed to donor body weight. The most reported patient-centred outcome was graft dysfunction severity in the first 72 h.
This review has identified a significant knowledge gap that indicates uncertainty regarding the safest ventilation practice in lung transplant recipients. The risk may be greatest in patients with established high-grade primary graft dysfunction and undersized allografts, and these factors may define a sub-group that warrants further investigation.

Lung allograft recipients have worse survival than all other solid organ transplant recipients, largely because of primary graft dysfunction (PGD), a major form of acute lung injury affecting a third of lung recipients within the first 72 h after transplant. PGD is the clinical manifestation of ischemia-reperfusion injury and represents the predominate cause of early morbidity and mortality. Despite PGD\'s impact on lung transplant outcomes, no targeted therapies are currently available; hence, care remains supportive and largely ineffective. This review focuses on molecular and innate immune mechanisms of ischemia-reperfusion injury leading to PGD. We also discuss novel research aimed at discovering biomarkers that could better predict PGD and potential targeted interventions that may improve outcomes in lung transplantation.

Maximizing patient and allograft survival after liver transplant (LT) is important from both a patient care and organ utilization perspective. Although individual studies have addressed the effects of short-term post-LT complications on a limited scale, there has not been a systematic review of the literature formally assessing the potential effects of early complications on long-term outcomes.
To identify whether short-term complications after LT affect allograft and overall survival, to identify short-term complications of particular clinical interest and significance, and to provide recommendations to improve post-LT graft and patient survival.
Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central.
A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines and recommendations using the GRADE approach derived from an international expert panel.
The literature review and analysis provided show that short-term complications have a large impact on allograft and patient survival after LT. The complications with the strongest effect on survival are acute kidney injury (AKI), biliary complications, and early allograft dysfunction (EAD).
This panel recommends taking measures to reduce the risk and incidence of short-term complications post-LT. Clinicians should pay particular attention to preventing or ameliorating AKI, biliary complications, and EAD (Quality of evidence; Moderate | Grade of Recommendation; Strong).

The early postoperative management strategies after heart transplantation include optimizing the function of the denervated heart, correcting the causes of hemodynamic instability, and initiating and maintaining immunosuppressive therapy, allograft rejection surveillance, and prophylaxis against infections caused by immunosuppression. The course of postoperative support is influenced by the quality of allograft myocardial protection prior to implantation and reperfusion, donor-recipient heart size matching, surgical technique of orthotopic heart transplantation, and patient factors (eg, preoperative condition, immunologic compatibility, postoperative vasomotor tone, severity and reversibility of pulmonary vascular hypertension, pulmonary function, mediastinal blood loss, and end-organ perfusion). This review provides an overview of the early postoperative care of recipients and includes a brief description of the surgical techniques for orthotopic heart transplantation.

Acute allograft dysfunction is rarely observed in kidney transplantation (KT). We report an unusual case of acute allograft dysfunction mimicking thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) in recipient with renal infarction. A 65-year-old man underwent KT from his 39-year-old son. Pre-transplant donor evaluation was normal except for the branches of the upper and lower pole renal arteries originating from the aorta in renal computed topographic angiography, respectively. The immediate post-transplant clinical course was uneventful, but serum creatinine (SCr) increased from 2.2 to 4.5 mg/dL, anemia and thrombocytopenia were shown, and serum lactate dehydrogenase increased to 919 U/L on the third day after transplantation. We suspected TMA, because of no evidence of acute bleeding. The laboratory parameters associated with TMA were within normal ranges. Renal magnetic resonance angiography revealed a focal wedge-shaped perfusion defect in the upper pole of the graft and renal Doppler ultrasonography showed decreased perfusion of the lower pole of the graft. Graft function improved with conservative therapy. The patient was discharged with SCr of 1.21 mg/dL. Graft function has been stable after discharge. Acute allograft infarction should be considered in the differential diagnosis of acute allograft dysfunction mimicking TMA in recipients with grafts supplied by multiple renal arteries.

OBJECTIVE: The clinical outcomes of delayed chest closure (DCC) compared with primary chest closure (PCC) following lung transplantation, including perioperative outcomes and long-term survival, remained controversial. This was the first systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify the short- and long-term outcomes of DCC following lung transplantation.
METHODS: We comprehensively searched electronic literature from 4 databases up to April 1st, 2022. Dichotomous data and continuous data were pooled with odds ratio and weighted mean difference, respectively. The quality of included studies was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
RESULTS: Ten studies were included in the systematic review and 4 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled analysis showed that DCC was associated with an increased risk of surgical site infection, prolonged hospital stays, and higher risk of primary graft dysfunction compared to PCC. The 30 day and 5 year survival were higher in PCC cohort compared with DCC cohort while differences in survival at 6 months was insignificant.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings do not support the aggressive application of DCC. DCC should be cautiously applied since its association with worse perioperative outcomes and higher mortality. But it remains the life-saving steps under dangerous circumstances.