%0 Systematic Review
%T Comparison of Prognosis for Lung Transplantation between Older and Younger Donors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Based on Cohort Studies.
%A Di Y
%A Fu R
%A Xiang Z
%A Sun H
%A Dai M
%A Zhang Q
%A Si Y
%J Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
%V 30
%N 1
%D 2024
%M 39111865
%F 1.889
%R 10.5761/atcs.ra.24-00092
%X <B>OBJECTIVE: </B>This meta-analysis aimed to compare the prognosis of lung transplantation recipients based on donor age.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>A detailed search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for cohort studies on lung transplantation. The prognosis of lung transplant recipients was investigated based on the donor age, with the primary outcomes being 1-year overall survival (OS), 3-year OS, 5-year OS, and 5-year chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD)-free survival.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>This meta-analysis included 10 cohort studies. Among the short-term outcomes, the older donor group demonstrated no significant difference from the young donor group in primary graft dysfunction within 72 hours, use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, length of ventilator use, and intensive care unit hours. However, a longer hospital stay was associated with the older donor group. In terms of long-term outcomes, no difference was found between the two groups in 1-year OS, 3-year OS, and 5-year OS. Notably, patients with older donors exhibited a superior 5-year CLAD-free survival.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>The results of this meta-analysis indicate that older donors are not inferior to younger donors in terms of long-term and short-term recipient outcomes. Lung transplantation using older donors is a potential therapeutic option after rigorous evaluation.