UNASSIGNED: Elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) and plates are currently the main internal fixation for treating Pediatric Diaphyseal Femur Fractures (PDFF), and the optimal choice of internal fixation is controversial. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare the surgical outcomes and complications of the two fixation methods.
UNASSIGNED: MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies published up to March, 2023, that compared ESIN and plate fixation techniques for treating PDFF. Pooled analysis identified differences in surgical outcomes between ESIN and plate, mainly regarding surgical outcomes and postoperative complications, such as time at surgery, fracture healing time, blood loss and related complications.
UNASSIGNED: We included 10 studies with 775 patients with PDFF in our review. Of these, 428 and 347 were treated with ESIN and Plate, respectively. In terms of postoperative complications, ESIN led to a shorter surgery time [MD = - 28.93, 95% CI (- 52.88 to - 4.98), P < 0.05], less blood loss [MD = - 66.94, 95% CI (- 87.79 to - 46.10), P < 0.001] and more fracture healing time [MD = 2.65, 95% CI (1.22-4.07), P < 0.001]. In terms of postoperative complications, ESIN led to fewer fections (RR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.37, 1.60, P = 0.48), fewer angulation deformities (RR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.35, 1.83, P = 0.60) and more prominent implants (RR = 3.36, 95% CI 1.88, 6.01, P < 0.001), more delayed unions (RR = 4.06, 95% CI 0.71, 23.06, P = 0.11).
UNASSIGNED: ESIN and Plate have similar rates of complications besides a prominent implant rate, while ESIN has a shorter period of operation and less intraoperative bleeding. Although both options are suitable, the results of this study support the use of ESIN rather than plates in the treatment of PDFF in terms of complication rates. In clinical applications, surgeons should choose the appropriate treatment method according to the actual situation.

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common surgical procedure for addressing cervical spine conditions. It involves the utilization of either cage plate system (CPS) or stand-alone cage (SC). The objective of our study is to compare perioperative complications, patient-reported clinical outcomes measures, and radiographic outcomes of SC versus CPS in ACDF.
We carried out a literature search in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, Web of science, Medline, and Google Scholar. All studies comparing the outcomes between CPS versus SC in ACDF were included.
Forty-one studies, 33 observational and 8 randomized clinical trials met the inclusion criteria. We found that both devices demonstrated comparable effectiveness in monosegmental ACDF with respect to Japanese Orthopedic Association Score, Neck Disability Index score, visual analog score, and fusion rates. CPS demonstrated superior performance in maintaining disc height, cervical lordosis, and exhibited lower incidence rates of cage subsidence. SC showed significant advantages over CPS in terms of shorter surgical duration, less intraoperative bleeding, shorter duration of hospitalization, as well as lower incidence rates of early postoperative dysphagia and adjacent segment disease.
Most of the included studies had monosegmented fusion, and there wasn\'t enough data to set recommendations for the multisegmented fusions. Larger studies with longer follow-up are necessary to draw more definitive conclusions to provide evidence for clinicians to make clinical decisions.

(1) Background: Pathological humeral shaft fracture (PHSF) is a frequently observed clinical manifestation in the later stages of tumor metastasis. Surgical interventions are typically recommended to alleviate pain and restore functionality. Intramedullary nail fixation (INF) or plate fixation (PF) is currently recommended for the treatment of PHSF. However, there is still no standard for optimal surgical treatment. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis comparing the clinical outcomes of INF with PF for PHSF treatment. (2) Methods: We conducted searches in databases, such as Scopus, EMBASE, and PubMed, for studies published prior to May 2023. In total, nine studies with 485 patients were reviewed. (3) Results: There were no significant differences noted in the incidence of fixation failure, local recurrence, wound complication or overall complication. However, the INF group demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of postoperative radial nerve palsy than the PF group (OR, 5.246; 95% CI, 1.548-17.774; p = 0.008). A subgroup analysis indicated that there were no statistically significant differences in fixation failure or local recurrence among subgroups categorized by the design of intramedullary nail. (4) Conclusions: Considering the short life expectancy of end-stage patients, the choice of surgical method depends on the patient\'s individual condition, fracture and lesion patterns, the surgeon\'s experience, and comprehensive discussion between the surgeon and patient.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of posterior malleolar fracture with plate or screw fixation is still controversial. Plate fixation is considered to have better stability but more soft tissue damage; screw fixation is less invasive and may yields lesser blood loss and surgery time. We conducted this meta-analysis to explore intraoperative and postoperative efficacy between plate and screw fixation in posterior malleolar fractured patients.
METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were searched in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Random-effects model and 95% confidence intervals was used. The outcomes of interest were surgery time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS), bone healing time, full weight bearing time, off bed ambulation time, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), complication rate, and rate of use of syndesmosis screw etc. RESULTS: One randomized clinical trial and fifty-two retrospective cohort studies with a total of 3757 patients (1956 in screw group and 1801 in plate group) were included in the systematic review. Compared to screw group, plate group yielded significantly longer surgery time, more intraoperative blood loss, but shorter length of hospital stay, better AOFAS, better Baird Jackson score, better AOFAS and Baird Jackson excellent-good rate, shorter bone healing time, shorter time enabling full weight bearing, shorter time enabling off bed ambulation, lesser postoperative pain, lesser complication rate, lesser loosening rate, lesser malunion rate, and lesser postoperative osteoarthritis.
CONCLUSIONS: Plate fixation is a favorable alternative to screw fixation in posterior malleolar fractured patients. Although plate fixation was at risk of longer surgery time and more blood loss, it provided better postoperative functional outcome, shorter healing, weight bearing and off bed ambulation time and lesser pain compared to screw fixation.

BACKGROUND: Bipolar clavicle injury is a rare injury involving any combination of dislocation and/or fracture at both ends of the clavicle. Most reports of bipolar clavicle injury have been based on a single case, and treatment of this injury remains controversial. The present study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of surgical management with internal plating for bipolar clavicle injuries.
METHODS: We performed internal plating to treat seven consecutive bipolar clavicle injuries with different injury patterns from May 2013 to June 2021. A clavicle hook plate was used for five sternoclavicular joint injuries (including a revision surgery) and three acromioclavicular joint dislocations, a T plate was used for one sternoclavicular joint injury, and an anatomic plate was used for one distal clavicle fracture. At follow-up, radiographs were assessed for bone alignment, joint congruity, fracture union or malunion, and implant failure or migration. Clinical evaluation included determination of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score; Constant-Murley score; visual analog scale (VAS) score; and complications.
RESULTS: The patients were regularly followed up after the operation, and functional parameters were assessed over time. At a mean follow-up of 28.1 ± 22.0 months, each fracture had solid bone union, and each dislocation showed no sign of recurrent instability. The mean shoulder forward flexion was 159.3° ± 7.9°, and the mean DASH score was 8.8 ± 5.1. The mean Constant-Murley score was 88.9 ± 7.9, with six cases assessed as excellent and one case assessed as good. The mean VAS score was 1.0 ± 1.5, and the mean patient satisfaction score was 9.3 ± 0.8. No complications occurred, and each patient was able to resume their preinjury daily activity and was highly satisfied with their treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, internal plating for bipolar clavicle injury allowed early mobilization and resulted in good joint function. We recommend fixation of the more severely affected side first because the other side may be passively reduced and acquire stability once the more severely affected side has been fixed. Internal fixation of the other end may therefore be unnecessary unless residual instability exists.

OBJECTIVE: For olecranon fractures, the choice of tension band wire (TBW) or plate fixation has long been controversial. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TBW and plate in the treatment of patients with Mayo II olecranon fractures by Meta-analysis.
METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, the Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, and China Biomedical Database were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies (CSs) where TBW was compared with plate for Mayo II olecranon fractures (OF). Subsequently, the data were extracted by two reviewers independently and were analysed via RevMan5.4.1. Besides, mean difference (MD), risk ratio (RR), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Furthermore, Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0 and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were adopted for assessing the risk of bias.
RESULTS: A total of 1RCT and 10 CSs were included, when 449 cases were treated with TBW and 378 with plate. The plate has favourable postoperative long-term (≥ 1 year) functional score in MEPS (MD: - 3.06; 95% CI - 5.50 to 0.62; P = 0.01; I2 = 41%) and Dash score (MD: 2.32; 95% CI 1.91, 2.73; P < 0.00001; I2 = 0%), also carrying fewer complications (RR: 2.13; 95% CI 1.48, 3.08; P < 0.0001; I2 = 58%). Besides, there exists no significant difference in postoperative long-term (≥ 1 year) elbow flexion (MD: - 1.82°; 95% CI - 8.54, 4.90; P = 0.60; I2 = 71%) and extension deficits (MD: 1.52°; 95% CI - 0.38, 3.42; P = 0.12; I2 = 92%). Moreover, TBW is featured with a shorter operation time (MD = - 5.87 min; 95% CI - 7.93, - 3.82; P < 0.00001; I2 = 0) and less intraoperative bleeding (MD: - 5.33 ml; 95% CI - 8.15, - 2.52; P = 0.0002; I2 = 0). In terms of fracture healing time, it is still controversial. Furthermore, the subgroup analysis has revealed that for Mayo IIA OF, the plate has a better outcome in the long-term (≥ 1 year) postoperative MEPS, the Dash score, and the incidence of postoperative complications than TBW, while there is no significant difference in the long-term (≥ 1 year) postoperative elbow motion between two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Plate has better efficacy and safety for Mayo II OF. Considering that few studies are included in the meta-analysis, more high-quality RCTs are still required to confirm these findings. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022313855.

BACKGROUND: Our study aims to evaluate the fracture nonunion rate and the functional score of plate and screw fixation, intramedullary nailing and non-surgical treatment in midshaft clavicle fractures patients using a network meta-analysis of data from clinical randomized controlled trials.
METHODS: The studies were abstracted from Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. RCTs meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected. Statistical analyses were conducted using Stata software, version 14.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas, USA).
RESULTS: 24 randomized controlled trials involving 2161 participants were included. The studies were published between 2007 and 2019. A total of 3 treatment methods-plate and screw fixation, intramedullary nailing and non-surgical treatment- were included in the literature. The treatments were ranked based on the Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA) probability. In terms of the constant score, the treatment methods were ranked as follows: intramedullary nailing, plate and screw fixation and non-surgical treatment. In terms of the DASH index, the treatment methods were ranked as follows: intramedullary nailing, plate and screw fixation and non-surgical treatment. In terms of the nonunion rate, the treatment methods were ranked as follows: intramedullary nailing, plate and screw fixation and non-surgical treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Non-surgical treatment has a high rate of nonunion for clavicular fractures with obvious displacement and notable comminution. Surgical treatment reduces the nonunion rate leads to better functional scores at long-term follow-up, although there may be no significant clinical differences. The fracture nonunion rate of plate screw fixation group and intramedullary nail group was low and the functional prognosis was similar. More RCTs focused on clavicular fractures are needed to further substantiate this conclusion.

UNASSIGNED: There is no clear consensus on the optimal type of fixation in intercalary allograft reconstruction. In this study, we aimed to compare the rate of most common complications following the plate and nail fixation of the intercalary allograft.
UNASSIGNED: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. Studies in which the complication rate of the single bridging plate and intramedullary nail fixation was extractable were included. Studies that used extra procedures such as cementation and fibular vascular graft augmentation were excluded. The primary outcome was the fixation-specific rate of nonunion. Secondary outcomes were the fixation-specific rate of fracture, infection, and local recurrence.
UNASSIGNED: In total, 13 studies with 431 reconstructions (352 reconstructions in the plate group and 79 reconstructions in the intramedullary nailing group) were included in this study. In the plate fixation, the rate of nonunion, fracture, infection and local recurrence was 12%, 11%, 11%, and 3%, respectively. In the intramedullary nail fixation, the rate of nonunion, fracture, infection, and local recurrence was 37%, 5%, 4%, and 0%, respectively. The rate of nonunion was significantly higher in the intramedullary nail group (OR = 6.34; 95% CI 2.98-13.49, P < 0.001). The rate of fracture, infection, and local recurrence was not significantly different between the two fixation methods.
UNASSIGNED: Intramedullary nail is associated with a significantly higher rate of nonunion. Since the rate of other complications was not significantly different between the two osteosynthesis types, plate fixation could be considered as a better type of fixation.
UNASSIGNED: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-021-00563-7.

UNASSIGNED: The purpose of this study was to classify the possible indications for a combined approach to distal radius fractures (DRFs) by investigating surgical outcomes of patients treated according to our treatment algorithm.
UNASSIGNED: A combined approach was performed in 32 patients. Patients who were thought to need a combined approach were classified into three types according to the combined injuries associated with loss of volar cortical buttresses in DRFs. The classifications included the following: type 1, free intra-articular fragments; type 2, distally migrated dorsal fragments located beyond the wrist joint; and type 3, centrally impacted articular fragments and displaced dorsal fragments, not reduced by indirect methods.
UNASSIGNED: Seven patients had type 1 fractures treated with volar plates and excision of the intra-articular fragments. Fourteen patients had type 2 fractures: 12 were treated with volar plates and excision of dorsal fragments, and 2 with relatively large unstable dorsal fragments were treated with combined volar and dorsal plates. The remaining 11 patients had type 3 fractures treated with combined volar and dorsal plates. At the latest follow-up, the radiographs revealed an average of 16.9° of radial inclination, an average of 4.2° of volar tilt, and an average of 7.5 mm of radial height. According to the Garland and Werley scores, the functional results were excellent for 3 patients, good for 25, and fair for 4.
UNASSIGNED: The classification system indicated when an additional dorsal approach was needed in unstable DRFs, and it may establish useful guidelines for appropriate surgical decision-making.

Nowadays, surgical intervention is an accepted treatment for congenital pseudoarthrosis of the clavicle (CPC). The purpose of this literature review is to evaluate the current body of evidence for methods and outcomes of surgical intervention for CPC. CPC is a rare deformity of the middle third of the clavicle not often identified until three to five years of age, at which time surgery is often recommended. The most common indication for surgery is cosmetic appearance, but other indications include pain, shoulder dysfunction, and prevention of complications later in life. Surgical intervention involves the resection and excision of the pseudoarthrosis, bone grafting (most commonly autologous tissue from the iliac crest), and internal fixation using plates or Kirschner wires (K-wires). Plate fixation tends to have fewer complications and better long-term outcomes. Following surgery, outcomes include satisfaction with cosmetic appearance, decreased pain, and improved shoulder function.