patient survey

患者调查
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:感觉异常痛(NP)是一种神经性瘙痒,其特征是背部中部复发性瘙痒。关于NP的大部分仍不清楚,尤其是病人的经验。
    目标:神经性瘙痒患者调查(NIRVE)是一项全球性的,从患者的角度进行在线调查,以更好地表征神经性瘙痒的症状负担。
    患者和方法:本报告侧重于自我报告诊断为NP的NIRVE参与者亚群的症状负担(N=91)。受访者报告说,在接受NP的准确诊断之前,他们的症状平均访问了2个医疗保健提供者(HCP)。
    结果:最常见的皮肤症状是瘙痒/瘙痒,敏感皮肤,疼痛或生皮肤,麻木,还有刺痛.大多数受访者目前报告的症状包括瘙痒/瘙痒,麻木,疼痛或生皮肤,刺痛,和灼热的感觉。在目前出现症状的患者中,麻木和瘙痒/瘙痒被列为最严重的,接着是刺痛,灼热或热的感觉,然后是疼痛或生的皮肤。大多数患者在接受病情诊断之前会咨询多个医疗保健提供者(HCP)。
    结论:瘙痒是该病最普遍的症状,尽管有一半的患者报告也经历了敏感的皮肤,疼痛或生皮肤,麻木,或刺痛。
    Background: Notalgia paresthetica (NP) is a form of neuropathic itch characterized by recurrent itch in the mid back. Much about NP remains unclear, especially the patient experience.
    Objectives: The Neuropathic Itch Patient Survey (NIRVE) was a global, online survey conducted to better characterize the symptom burden of neuropathic itch from the patient perspective.
    Patients and methods: This report focuses on the symptom burden of the subpopulation of NIRVE participants with a self-reported diagnosis of NP (N = 91). Respondents reported visiting a median of 2 healthcare providers (HCPs) for their symptoms before receiving an accurate diagnosis of NP.
    Results: The most common cutaneous symptoms ever experienced were itch/pruritus, sensitive skin, painful or raw skin, numbness, and tingling. The symptoms reported by the most respondents as currently being experienced included itch/pruritus, numbness, painful or raw skin, tingling, and burning or hot sensation. Of patients currently experiencing symptoms, numbness and itch/pruritus were ranked as the most intense, followed by tingling, burning or hot sensation, and then painful or raw skin. Most patients consult multiple healthcare providers (HCPs) before receiving a diagnosis for their condition.
    Conclusion: Itch is overwhelmingly the most prevalent symptom of the condition, although half of patients also report experiencing sensitive skin, painful or raw skin, numbness, or tingling.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    了解患者对正颌手术的动机和期望是围手术期评估的关键方面。因为这些因素已被证明会影响患者对手术结果的满意度.
    连续接受三级口腔颌面外科医生正颌手术的患者进行了两次结构化访谈,以探讨他们进行正颌手术的术前动机,他们对手术及其结果的术后反思。访谈被逐字转录,并使用主题分析进行分析。
    招募了18名患者,术后完成7次访谈。术前主题描述了患者对美学改善的希望,社会情感的改善,功能改善和减少疼痛,以及对手术风险的担忧,手术恢复和外观变化。术后主题描述了具有挑战性的恢复过程,缺乏遗憾和功能性,审美和社会情感的改善。
    正颌手术患者的动机可能是功能性的,手术前的审美和社会情感改善。
    UNASSIGNED: Understanding patient motivations and expectations of orthognathic surgery are critical aspects of the perioperative assessment, as these factors have been demonstrated to influence patient satisfaction with surgical outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: Consecutive patients undergoing orthognathic surgery by a tertiary oral and maxillofacial surgeon underwent two structured interviews to explore their pre-operative motivations for orthognathic surgery, their post-operative reflections on the surgery and their outcomes. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: Eighteen patients were recruited and interviewed preoperatively, and seven completed interviews postoperatively. Pre-operative themes describe patient hopes for aesthetic improvements, socio-emotional improvements, functional improvements and reduced pain, as well as fears about surgical risks, surgical recovery and changing appearance. Post-operative themes describe the challenging recovery process, the absence of regrets and functional, aesthetic and socio-emotional improvements.
    UNASSIGNED: Orthognathic surgery patients may be motivated by functional, aesthetic and socio-emotional improvements before surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是通过分析处方模式了解局部用双氯芬酸Voltaren凝胶(VGD)2.32和1.16%消费者的概况,并表征治疗满意度,功能损害,在现实世界的条件下,在瑞典使用非处方(OTC)VGD后缓解疼痛。
    方法:这种观察,在瑞典进行的真实世界研究有回顾性和前瞻性部分.回顾性二级数据部分使用了瑞典电子卫生局(E-hälsomyndigheten)的12个月双氯芬酸凝胶处方数据。前瞻性部分包括由购买OTCVGD治疗疼痛的成年消费者在基线和第4周和第12周完成的电子调查。
    结果:次要数据分析(n=12,145)显示,接受双氯芬酸凝胶的患者中有56.7%为≥70岁的女性。大多数患者没有改变疼痛治疗;双氯芬酸凝胶补充的平均时间约为2.5个月。从调查(n=264)来看,VGD提供疼痛缓解,通过11点疼痛数字评分量表评分的改善来表明。基线时的平均疼痛严重程度为5.8-在第4周和第12周分别平均改善1.3和1.9分。大多数消费者报告日常功能有所改善(即,与健康相关的生活质量[HRQoL]),大多数人对VGD治疗结果至少有些满意。
    结论:这项现实世界的研究为双氯芬酸凝胶的处方模式和瑞典OTCVGD的消费者体验提供了重要的见解。患者很少改用其他局部非甾体抗炎药,与基线相比,VGD消费者报告疼痛缓解和HRQoL改善-导致治疗满意度。
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to understand profiles of topical Voltaren gel diclofenac (VGD) 2.32 and 1.16% consumers through analyzing prescription patterns and to characterize treatment satisfaction, functional impairment, and pain relief after over-the-counter (OTC) VGD use in Sweden under real-world conditions.
    METHODS: This observational, real-world study conducted in Sweden had retrospective and prospective segments. The retrospective secondary data segment utilized 12-month diclofenac gel prescription data from the Swedish eHealth Agency (E-hälsomyndigheten). The prospective segment included electronic surveys completed at baseline and weeks 4 and 12 by adult consumers who purchased OTC VGD to treat their pain.
    RESULTS: Secondary data analyses (n = 12,145) showed that 56.7% of patients receiving diclofenac gel were females ≥70 years old. Most patients did not switch pain treatments; the mean time between diclofenac gel refills was about 2.5 months. From the surveys (n = 264), VGD provided pain relief, indicated by improvement in 11-point pain numeric rating scale scores. Average pain severity at baseline was 5.8 - improving by a mean of 1.3 and 1.9 points at weeks 4 and 12, respectively. The majority of consumers reported improvement in daily functioning (i.e., health-related quality of life [HRQoL]), and most were at least somewhat satisfied with VGD treatment results.
    CONCLUSIONS: This real-world study provides important insights into the prescription patterns of diclofenac gel and the consumer experience with OTC VGD in Sweden. Patients rarely switched to other topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and VGD consumers reported pain relief and improved HRQoL compared to baseline - resulting in treatment satisfaction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:患者体验调查通过众多调查项目收集有关护理各个方面的信息。确定患者体验的最关键领域以优先考虑质量护理改进可能具有挑战性。这项研究的目的是确定哪些护理经验项目是影响患者癌症护理总体评级的驱动因素。
    方法:分析了来自瑞士癌症患者经验第二波研究的2750名成年癌症患者的数据。这项横断面调查于2021年9月至2022年2月在八家瑞士医院进行。逐步逻辑回归检查了总体护理评级与29个患者经验项目之间的关系,涵盖了以患者为中心的不同护理维度,同时针对社会人口统计学和健康变量进行了调整。
    结果:总体而言,患者对他们的癌症护理经验的评分为8.9/10.逐步回归确定了对整体护理评级有贡献的七个驱动因素。最强的车手是“专业人士合作得很好”(赔率比[OR],4.81)和“没有重复测试”(或,2.09)从协调和整合的维度来看,“为治疗期间的症状提供支持”(或,2.11)从物理舒适维度来看,其次是“医院工作人员确保可用的家庭支持”(或,1.99),“提出要去看卫生专业人员”(或者,1.91),“解释了治疗方案”(或,1.75),和“根据需要参与治疗决策”(或,1.68).
    结论:本研究使用综合工具评估了癌症患者的护理经验,该工具确定了与整体护理评级独立相关的七个关键因素。通过专注于这些领域,医院不仅可以改善患者护理体验,还可以有效地将资源分配到质量改进计划中。
    BACKGROUND: Patient experience surveys gather information on various aspects of care via numerous survey items. Identifying the most critical areas of patient experience to prioritize for quality care improvement can be challenging. The objective of this study was to determine which care experience items are the drivers influencing patients\' overall rating of cancer care.
    METHODS: Data from 2750 adult patients with cancer from the second wave of the Swiss Cancer Patient Experiences study were analyzed. This cross-sectional survey was conducted in eight Swiss hospitals from September 2021 to February 2022. Stepwise logistic regression examined the relationship between overall care rating and 29 patient experience items covering different patient-centered care dimensions while adjusting for sociodemographic and health variables.
    RESULTS: Overall, patients rated their cancer care experience at 8.9 out of 10. Stepwise regression identified seven drivers contributing to overall care rating. The strongest drivers were \"professionals worked well together\" (odds ratio [OR], 4.81) and \"tests were not repeated\" (OR, 2.09) from the coordination and integration dimension, \"offered support for symptoms during treatment\" (OR, 2.11) from the physical comfort dimension, followed by \"hospital staff ensured available home support\" (OR, 1.99), \"offered to see health professional for concerns\" (OR, 1.91), \"treatment options were explained\" (OR, 1.75), and \"involved in treatment decisions as desired\" (OR, 1.68).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study evaluated the care experiences of patients with cancer with a comprehensive tool that identified seven key factors independently associated with overall care rating. By concentrating on these areas, hospitals can not only improve the patient care experience but also efficiently allocate resources to quality improvement initiatives.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    特应性皮炎(AD)是一种慢性和波动性疾病。AD和相关合并症的最佳管理需要跨医疗保健系统的多个层的无缝协调。这项调查的目的是探讨患者目前管理AD的经验。在这个匿名调查的251名回应者中,76%报告患有中度或重度AD。仅在初级保健水平随访了69%的中度AD和45%的重度AD。使用先进的系统治疗方案很少,和大多数经历瘙痒(97%),皮肤干燥,皮疹,尽管正在进行治疗,但对自尊和合并症的负面影响。只有36%的人接受了治疗计划,二级保健(78.3%)比初级保健(25.0%)更常见。43%的人不知道谁负责他们的后续行动,54%的人认为没有人负责。通常不知道或不了解治疗选择。调查结果显示治疗不足,缺乏全面的AD管理方法。包括明确的转诊标准和时间表的国家途径可以简化医疗保健系统多个级别的AD管理。
    Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic and fluctuating disease. Optimal management of AD and related comorbidities requires seamless coordination across multiple layers of the healthcare system. The objective of this survey was to explore patients\' experiences with current management of AD. Out of 251 responders to this anonymous survey, 76% reported to have moderate or severe AD. Sixty-nine percent with moderate and 45% with severe AD were followed up at primary care level only. Use of advanced systemic treatment options was rare, and the majority experienced itch (97%), dry skin, rash, negative impact on self-esteem and comorbidities despite ongoing treatment. Only 36% received a treatment plan, more often in secondary (78.3%) than primary care (25.0%). Forty-three percent did not know who was responsible for their follow-up and 54% felt no one was responsible. Treatment options were commonly not known or understood. The survey results demonstrate undertreatment, lack of a holistic approach for management of AD. A national pathway including clear referral criteria and timelines can streamline management of AD across multiple levels of the healthcare system.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在未发现癌症的情况下,没有标准化方法可以在紧急疑似癌症(USC)转诊后提供建议。本研究旨在评估南加州大学转诊后接受建议的偏好和可接受性,涉及:1)管理持续症状,2)对其他癌症的早期症状作出反应,3)癌症筛查,4)降低未来癌症的风险。
    来自两个英国NHS信托基金的2,541名患者在紧急疑似胃肠道或头颈部癌症转诊后没有发现癌症1-3个月后邮寄了一项调查。参与者被问及:接受建议的意愿;预期可接受性;与模式相关的偏好,时间安排和谁应该提供建议;以及以前的建议收据。
    406名患者(16.0%)在最终分析中为397。很少有参与者以前收到过建议,但大多数人都愿意。意愿因建议类型而异:愿意接受其他癌症早期症状的建议(88.9%)少于与持续症状相关的建议(94.3%)。所有建议类型的可接受性相对较高。降低未来癌症风险的建议更容易接受。少数族裔群体的可接受性较低,教育水平较低。大多数参与者更愿意接受医生的建议;有结果或不久之后;面对面或通过电话。
    在未发现癌症的情况下,在USC转诊后可能存在未满足的建议需求。公平干预设计应侧重于提高少数民族和受教育程度较低的人的可接受性。
    UNASSIGNED: No standardised approach exists to provide advice after urgent suspected cancer (USC) referral when cancer is not found. This study aimed to assess preferences and acceptability of receiving advice after USC referral related to: 1) managing ongoing symptoms, 2) responding to early symptoms of other cancers, 3) cancer screening, 4) reducing risks of future cancer.
    UNASSIGNED: 2,541 patients from two English NHS Trusts were mailed a survey 1-3 months after having no cancer found following urgent suspected gastrointestinal or head and neck cancer referral. Participants were asked about: willingness to receive advice; prospective acceptability; preferences related to mode, timing and who should provide advice; and previous advice receipt.
    UNASSIGNED: 406 patients responded (16.0%) with 397 in the final analyses. Few participants had previously received advice, yet most were willing to. Willingness varied by type of advice: fewer were willing to receive advice about early symptoms of other cancers (88.9%) than advice related to ongoing symptoms (94.3%). Acceptability was relatively high for all advice types. Reducing the risk of future cancer advice was more acceptable. Acceptability was lower in those from ethnic minority groups, and with lower levels of education. Most participants preferred to receive advice from a doctor; with results or soon after; either face to face or via the telephone.
    UNASSIGNED: There is a potential unmet need for advice after USC referral when no cancer is found. Equitable intervention design should focus on increasing acceptability for people from ethnic minority groups and those with lower levels of education.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性(nAMD)是全球老年人永久性视力丧失和失明的主要原因。对患者的日常生活产生重大影响。然而,从患者的角度来看,与nAMD相关的负担还没有得到很好的记录。在这里,我们在引发nAMD患者的日常挑战后开发了一份新的问卷,随后进行了一项试点调查。确定了七个日常生活负担域,并在现实世界的诊所使用问卷进行了定量调查。在总共153名参与者中(平均年龄,76.3±8.3年),67例(43.8%)双侧nAMD,根据最佳矫正视力将79例(52.7%)分为严重nAMD,logMAR的临界值为0.52。双侧和重度nAMD患者在所有领域的负担得分均显着较高。双边和严重疾病亚组的网络模型确定了“日常生活活动”和“手眼协调”之间以及“电子设备使用”和“面部识别”领域之间的相互作用,这被认为是患者的重要负担。这些结果可以促进眼科医生了解nAMD对患者日常生活的影响,以及积极和持续治疗nAMD患者的重要性。
    Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is a prevalent cause of permanent vision loss and blindness in the elderly worldwide, with a significant impact on patients\' daily lives. However, burdens related to nAMD from the patients\' perspective have not been well documented. Here we developed a new questionnaire after eliciting nAMD patients\' daily challenges followed by a pilot survey. Seven daily life burden domains were identified, and a quantitative survey was conducted using the questionnaire in the real-world clinic. Of the total 153 participants (mean age, 76.3 ± 8.3 years), 67 (43.8%) had bilateral nAMD, and 79 (52.7%) were classified into severe nAMD according to the best-corrected visual acuity with cut-off value of 0.52 in logMAR. Patients with bilateral and severe nAMD had significantly higher burden scores across all domains. Network models for the bilateral and severe disease subgroups identified the interactions between \"activity of daily living\" and \"hand-eye coordination\" and between \"use of electronic devices\" and \"face recognition\" domains, which were considered to be important burdens for the patients. These results can advance ophthalmologists\' understanding of the impact of nAMD on patients\' daily lives and the importance of active and continuing treatment for patients with nAMD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:社会经济和健康素养资源较少的患者在获得和使用医疗保健方面处于不利地位,这可能会导致更糟糕的护理体验,从而导致患者体验的不平等。然而,只有有限数量的研究研究了社会经济和健康素养因素如何影响癌症治疗患者的不平等。
    目的:根据患者的经济状况和健康素养,检查患者的癌症治疗经历是否不同。
    方法:对来自瑞士癌症患者经历-2(SCAPE-2)研究的2789名被诊断患有癌症的成年患者的数据进行二次分析,一项从2021年9月至2022年2月在瑞士八家医院进行的横断面调查.回归分析用于检查患者的经济状况和健康素养对癌症护理经验的各种结果的独立影响。涵盖以患者为中心的护理的八个不同维度,控制混杂因素。
    结果:调整后的回归分析显示,经济状况较低的患者在29种特定护理经历中有12种癌症护理经历明显恶化,特别是在“尊重患者”和“身体舒适”的维度上,所有的经历项目都与经济地位有关。此外,在23次特定护理体验中,较低的健康素养与较差的患者体验相关.\'尊重患者\'偏好\'维度中的所有项目,“身体舒适”和“情感支持”与健康素养有关。
    结论:这项研究揭示了在以患者为中心的护理的不同方面,患者的经济状况和健康素养形成了癌症护理经验的显著不平等。必须解决在获得和使用医疗保健系统方面面临障碍的更弱势患者的需求,不仅要减轻癌症治疗中的不平等,还要避免健康结果中的不平等。
    BACKGROUND: Patients with fewer socioeconomic and health literacy resources are disadvantaged in their access and use of healthcare, which may give rise to worse experiences with care and thus inequalities in patient experiences. However, only a limited number of studies have examined how socioeconomic and health literacy factors shape inequalities in patients\' experiences with cancer care.
    OBJECTIVE: To examine whether patients\' experiences with cancer care differ according to their economic status and health literacy.
    METHODS: Secondary analysis of data on 2789 adult patients diagnosed with cancer from the Swiss Cancer Patient Experiences-2 (SCAPE-2) study, a cross-sectional survey conducted in eight hospitals across Switzerland from September 2021 to February 2022. Regression analysis was applied to examine the independent effect of patients\' economic status and health literacy on various outcomes of experiences with cancer care, covering eight different dimensions of patient-centred care, controlling for confounding factors.
    RESULTS: Adjusted regression analysis showed that patients with lower economic status reported significantly worse experiences with cancer care in 12 out of 29 specific care experiences, especially in the dimensions of \'respect for patients\' preferences\' and \'physical comfort\' where all items of experiences were associated with economic status. Additionally, lower health literacy was associated with worse patient experiences in 23 specific care experiences. All items in the dimensions of \'respect for patients\' preferences\', \'physical comfort\' and \'emotional support\' were associated with health literacy.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed significant inequalities in experiences with cancer care shaped by the economic status and health literacy of patients across different dimensions of patient-centred care. It is essential to address the needs of more disadvantaged patients who face obstacles in their access and use of the healthcare system, not only to mitigate inequalities in cancer care but also to avoid inequalities in health outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    基因检测和咨询对于评估乳腺癌风险和定制治疗策略至关重要。然而,一些障碍阻碍患者选择基因检测/咨询,导致不到三分之一的患者接受检测,甚至更少的患者接受咨询。对这些障碍的详细了解对于克服它们至关重要。
    由患者作者开发的一项跨国调查在9个国家进行,确定特定的地方/区域障碍。调查问题路径是个性化的,基于对先前问题的回答。对答复选项的答复百分比是根据该问题的答复者总数计算的。卡方检验用于评估结果的显著性,如果适用。
    最终分析集(FAS)包括1,176名受访者,其中一个子集可以回答所有问题。在FAS中,63%的受访者接受过测试。在那些接受测试的人中,70%的人接受了测试。在未经测试的受访者中,只有40%的人接受了测试,但最终没有接受测试。在被测试的人群中,44%的人接受了咨询,显著高于未测试组的7%(p<0.00001)。在那些关于意识的报道中,71%的人报告说,在癌症诊断之前,意识水平介于“非常低”和“中等”之间。大多数受访者(71%)同意所有乳腺癌患者在开始治疗前都应接受检查。然而,与其他地区的受访者相比,亚洲患者接受这一观点的可能性较小(25%vs≥50%;p<0.00001)。接受测试的受访者“非常愿意”接受测试的家庭成员(44%)与未经测试的受访者(11%)相比,比例更高,澳大利亚(77%)和俄罗斯(56%)受访者的意愿相对较高,区域差异具有统计学意义(p<0.00001)。
    访问中仍然存在关键差距,基因检测和咨询的意识和感知价值,在测试组和未测试组之间具有区域差异或差异。大多数病人没有得到咨询,这可能与测试的低摄取有关。需要采取战略行动来推动政策制定,并改善获得检测和咨询的机会,包括提高患者意识和改善患者体验,以获得更好的治疗效果。
    UNASSIGNED: Genetic testing and counselling are critical in assessing breast cancer risk and tailoring treatment strategies. However, several barriers hinder patients from opting for genetic testing/counselling, leading to fewer than one-third of patients undergoing testing and even fewer being offered counselling. A granular understanding of these barriers is essential in overcoming them.
    UNASSIGNED: A multinational survey developed by patient authors was conducted in 9 countries, to identify the specific local/regional barriers. The survey question pathway was individualized, based on responses to prior questions. Percentage responses to a response option were calculated based on the total number of respondents to that question. Chi-square tests were used to assess the significance of the results, if applicable.
    UNASSIGNED: The final analysis set (FAS) included 1,176 respondents, with a subset of this responding to all questions. In the FAS, 63% of respondents had undergone testing. Among those who got tested, 70% were offered testing. Among untested respondents, only 40% were offered the test but eventually did not get tested. In the tested population, 44% received counselling, which was significantly higher than 7% (p<0.00001) in the untested group. Among those reporting on awareness, 71% reported awareness level between \'very low\' and \'moderate\' prior to cancer diagnosis. Most respondents (71%) agreed that all breast cancer patients should undergo testing before treatment initiation. However, Asian patients were less likely to endorse this view compared to respondents from other regions (25% vs ≥50%; p<0.00001). A higher proportion of tested respondents were \'very willing\' to get their family members tested (44%) versus untested respondents (11%), with relatively higher willingness among Australian (77%) and Russian respondents (56%), the regional variation being statistically significant (p<0.00001).
    UNASSIGNED: Critical gaps remain in the access, awareness and perceived value of genetic testing and counselling, with regional variance or difference between the tested and untested groups. Most patients are not offered counselling, which may be associated with the low uptake of testing. Strategic action is needed to drive policy-shaping and improve access to testing and counselling, including raising patient awareness and improving patient experience for better treatment outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    银屑病显著影响患者的生活质量(QoL)。不满意和不坚持是与局部治疗相关的主要障碍。设计了一种基于多微泡分散体(PAD)技术的乳膏,该乳膏包含固定剂量的卡泊三醇(CAL)和二丙酸倍他米松(BDP),用于患者友好的牛皮癣管理。CAL/BDPPAD霜显示出功效,便利性,和临床试验中的安全性/耐受性。
    这项研究评估了现实世界的使用,感知,满意,和CAL/BDPPAD-乳膏在斑块状银屑病患者中的依从性。
    在2023年9月至11月之间,通过Wefight网络招募了来自西班牙和德国的使用或使用CAL/BDPPAD-乳膏>2周的牛皮癣患者,以完成30个问题的在线调查。将匿名结果合并用于描述性统计分析。
    该调查由129名患者完成(平均年龄:43岁;66%女性;平均牛皮癣持续时间:12年)。大多数患者(93%)对CAL/BDPPAD乳膏感到满意。66%的人报告了高依从性(视觉模拟评分80-100),91%的人首选CAL/BDPPAD-乳膏,以其先前的局部用药。患者强调其应用的易用性/便利性,耐受性,和缺乏瘙痒/燃烧。
    在真实世界环境中接受CAL/BDPPAD霜治疗的银屑病患者表现出很高的满意度,良好的坚持,以及对产品的积极看法,表明临床试验中观察到的有利结果转化为真正的临床实践。
    UNASSIGNED: Psoriasis significantly impacts patients\' quality of life (QoL). Dissatisfaction and non-adherence are major barriers associated with topical treatments. A cream based on the polyaphron dispersion (PAD) Technology containing a fixed-dose of calcipotriol (CAL) and betamethasone dipropionate (BDP) was designed for a patient-friendly psoriasis management. The CAL/BDP PAD-cream demonstrated efficacy, convenience, and safety/tolerability in clinical trials.
    UNASSIGNED: This research assesses the real-world use, perception, satisfaction, and adherence of CAL/BDP PAD-cream among plaque psoriasis patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Between September-November 2023, psoriasis patients from Spain and Germany using or having used CAL/BDP PAD-cream for >2 weeks were recruited via Wefight network to complete a 30-questions online survey. Anonymized results were pooled for descriptive statistical analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: The survey was completed by 129 patients (mean age: 43 years; 66% females; mean psoriasis duration: 12 years). Most patients (93%) were satisfied with CAL/BDP PAD-cream. The 66% reported high adherence (visual analogue scale 80-100) and 91% preferred CAL/BDP PAD-cream to their previous topical(s). Patients highlighted its ease/convenience of application, tolerability, and lack of itching/burning.
    UNASSIGNED: Psoriasis patients treated with CAL/BDP PAD-cream in a real-world setting show high satisfaction, good adherence, and a positive perception of the product, suggesting that favorable outcomes observed in clinical trials translate to real clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号