与运动相关的脑震荡与一系列短期功能缺陷有关,通常认为这些缺陷可以在受伤后的两周内恢复。但肯定不是全部,人员。静息状态脑电图(rs-EEG)可能被证明是负担得起的,可访问,和评估脑损伤严重程度和脑震荡后恢复率的敏感方法。本文对运动相关脑震荡中的rs-EEG进行了系统评价。对以英语发表的文章进行系统的回顾,截至2017年6月,通过PsychINFO检索,Medline,Medline正在处理中,Embase,SportDiscus,CINAHL,和Cochrane图书馆,评论,和试验。以下关键词用于数据库搜索:脑电图,定量脑电图,qEEG,颅脑外伤,轻度创伤性脑损伤,mTBI,创伤性脑损伤,脑震荡,脑震荡,脑损伤,运动,运动,和运动员。观察,队列,相关,横截面,纵向研究均纳入本综述.16篇文章符合纳入标准,其中包括504名运动员和367名对照的数据。所有16篇文章都报道了脑震荡后rs-EEG活动的一些异常;然而,受影响的皮质节律各不相同。尽管16项研究在方法和分析上存在重大差异,本综述提示rs-EEG可能为识别运动员脑震荡后持续性功能变化提供可靠的技术.因为方法多种多样,然而,需要大量的工作来建立系统的方法来评估其作为重返游戏标志的效力。
Sports-related concussion is associated with a range of short-term functional deficits that are commonly thought to recover within a two-week post-injury period for most, but certainly not all, persons. Resting state electroencephalography (rs-EEG) may prove to be an affordable, accessible, and sensitive method of assessing severity of brain injury and rate of recovery after a concussion. This article presents a systematic
review of rs-EEG in sports-related concussion. A systematic
review of articles published in the English language, up to June 2017, was retrieved via PsychINFO, Medline, Medline In Process, Embase, SportDiscus, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library, Reviews, and Trials. The following key words were used for database searches: electroencephalography, quantitative electroencephalography, qEEG, cranio-cerebral trauma, mild traumatic brain injury, mTBI, traumatic brain injury, brain concussion, concussion, brain damage, sport, athletic, and athlete. Observational, cohort, correlational, cross-sectional, and longitudinal studies were all included in the current
review. Sixteen articles met inclusion criteria, which included data on 504 athletes and 367 controls. All 16 articles reported some abnormality in rs-EEG activity after a concussion; however, the cortical rhythms that were affected varied. Despite substantial methodological and analytical differences across the 16 studies, the current
review suggests that rs-EEG may provide a reliable technique to identify persistent functional changes in athletes after a concussion. Because of the varied approaches, however, considerable work is needed to establish a systematic methodology to assess its efficacy as a marker of return-to-play.