BACKGROUND: For patients with sepsis receiving non-invasive ventilation (NIV), early rehabilitation is crucial. The Sitting Baduanjin (SBE) is an efficient early rehabilitation exercise suitable for bed patients. There is no consensus about the effect of SBE on the early rehabilitation of septic patients with NIV. This study focused on how the SBE affected the early rehabilitation of sepsis patients with NIV.
METHODS: 96 sepsis patients with NIV were randomly assigned to either an Baduanjin group that received the SBE based on the routine rehabilitation exercise (n = 48) or a control group (n = 48) that received routine rehabilitation exercise. The primary outcome was the Medical Research Council(MRC)score, and the Barthel Index score, the duration of NIV, length of ICU stay, length of total stay, hospitalization expense as secondary outcomes.
RESULTS: A total of 245 sepsis patients were screened, with 96 randomly assigned. The study was completed by 90 patients out of the 96 participants.Results revealed that the MRC score increased in both groups, but the improvement of muscle strength in Baduanjin group was more obvious, with statistical significance (p < 0.001).There was statistically significantly difference between the two groups in Barthel Index at the day of transfer out of ICU(P = 0.028).The patients in the Baduanjin group had an average reduction of 24.09 h in the duration of NIV and 3.35 days in total length of hospital stay compared with the control group (p < 0.05).Of note, the Baduanjin group had significantly reduction the total hospitalization expense. No serious adverse events occurred during the intervention period.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with sepsis, the SBE appears to improve muscle strength and activities of daily living (ADL), and lowed the duration of NIV, the length of the total stay, and the hospitalization expense.
BACKGROUND: The study registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( www.chictr.org.cn ), Clinical Trials identifier ChiCTR1800015011 (28/02/2018).

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy has emerged as a significant advancement in respiratory support, offering a non-invasive alternative to traditional oxygen delivery methods in critical care settings. This review comprehensively evaluates HFNC therapy, focusing on its definition, historical evolution, and current clinical applications. HFNC therapy delivers humidified and heated oxygen at high flow rates through a nasal cannula, enhancing oxygenation and patient comfort. The review highlights the physiological mechanisms underlying HFNC and its efficacy in managing acute respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations, and postoperative respiratory support. Key findings from clinical trials and meta-analyses are discussed, emphasizing HFNC\'s advantages over conventional methods, such as reduced intubation rates and shorter ICU stays. The review also addresses safety considerations, including potential risks and complications associated with HFNC therapy. Furthermore, it explores future directions for research and technological advancements aimed at optimizing HFNC use in diverse patient populations. This review aims to provide evidence-based insights to inform clinical practice and guide future investigations in respiratory therapy.

BACKGROUND: Use of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in the intensive care unit (ICU) is increasing, yet reporting of nutrition intake, muscle thickness, or recovery outcomes in this population is limited.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to quantify muscle thickness, nutrition intake, and functional recovery outcomes for patients receiving HFNC/NIV within the ICU.
METHODS: A single-centre, prospective, observational study in adult ICU patients recruited within 48 hrs of commencing HFNC/NIV. Change in quadriceps muscle layer thickness using ultrasound (primary outcome) and 24 hr nutrition intake from study inclusion to day 7 (D7), functional capacity (Barthel Index), and quality of life (EuroQol five-dimension five-level utility index) at D90 were assessed. Data are n (%), mean ± standard deviation or median [interquartile range], are compared using paired sample t-test, and a P value of <0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS: Primary outcome data were available for n = 28/42: 64 ± 13 y, 61% male, body mass index: 29.1 ± 9.0 kg/m2, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score: 17 ± 5. Quadriceps muscle layer thickness reduced from 2.41 ± 0.87 to 2.12 ± 0.73 cm; mean difference: -0.29 cm (95% confidence interval: -0.44, -0.13). Nutrition intake increased from study inclusion to D7: 1735 ± 1283 to 5448 ± 2858 kJ and 17.4 ± 16.6 to 60.9 ± 36.8g protein. Barthel Index was 87 ± 20 at baseline and 91 ± 15 at D90 (out of 100). Quality of life was impaired at D90: 0.64 ± 0.23 (health = 1.0).
CONCLUSIONS: Critically ill patients receiving HFNC/NIV experienced muscle loss and impaired quality of life.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend non-invasive ventilatory (NIV) support as first-line respiratory support mode in preterm infants as NIV is superior to intubation and mechanical ventilation in preventing death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia. However, with an ever-expanding variety of NIV modes available, there is much debate about which NIV modality should ideally be used, how, and when. The aims of this work were to summarise the evidence on different NIV modalities for both primary and secondary respiratory support: nCPAP, nasal high-flow therapy (nHFT), and nasal intermittent positive airway pressure ventilation (nIPPV), bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP), nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (nHFOV), and nasally applied, non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NIV-NAVA) modes, with particular focus on their use in preterm infants.
CONCLUSIONS: This is a narrative review with reference to published guidelines by European Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome: 2022 Update. nCPAP is currently the most commonly used primary and secondary NIV modality for premature infants. However, there is increasing evidence on the superiority of nIPPV over nCPAP. No beneficial effect was found for BiPAP over nCPAP. For the use of nHFT, nHFOV, and NIV-NAVA, more studies are needed to establish their place in neonatal respiratory care.
CONCLUSIONS: The superiority of nIPPV over nCPAP needs to be confirmed by contemporaneous trials comparing nCPAP to nIPPV at comparable mean airway pressures. Future trials should study NIV modalities in preterm infants with comparable respiratory pathology and indications, at comparable pressure settings and with different modes of synchronisation. Importantly, future trials should not exclude infants of the smallest gestational ages.

Heart failure (HF) is an increasingly prevalent disease in humans; it induces multiple symptoms and damages health. The animal gut microbiota has critical roles in host health, which might be related to HF symptoms. Currently, several options are used to treat HF, including non-invasive ventilation (NIV). However, studies on gut microbiota responses to acute HF and associated treatments effects on gut communities in patients are scarce. Here, short-term (1 week after treatments) and long-term (3 months after treatment) variations in gut microbiota variations in rats with acute HF treated were examined NIV through high-throughput sequencing of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene. Through comparison of gut microbiota alpha diversity, it was observed lower gut microbiota richness and diversity in animals with acute HF than in normal animals. Additionally, beta-diversity analysis revealed significant alterations in the gut microbiota composition induced by acute HF, as reflected by increased Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes (F/B) ratios and Proteobacteria enrichment. When network analysis results were combined with the null model, decreased stability and elevated deterministic gut microbiota assemblies were observed in animals with acute HF. Importantly, in both short- and long-term periods, NIV was found to restore gut microbiota dysbiosis to normal states in acute HF rats. Finally, it was shown that considerable gut microbiota variations existed in rats with acute HF, that underlying microbiota mechanisms regulated these changes, and confirmed that NIV is suitable for HF treatment. In future studies, these findings should be validated with different model systems or clinical samples.

BACKGROUND: Preterm infants often require non-invasive breathing support while their lungs and control of respiration are still developing. Non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NIV-NAVA) is an emerging technology that allows infants to breathe spontaneously while receiving support breaths proportional to their effort. This study describes the first Australian Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) experience of NIV-NAVA.
METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of infants admitted to a major tertiary NICU between October 2017 and April 2021 supported with NIV-NAVA. Infants were divided into three groups based on the indication to initiate NIV-NAVA (post-extubation; apnoea; escalation). Successful application of NIV-NAVA was based on the need for re-intubation within 48 h of application.
RESULTS: There were 169 NIV-NAVA episodes in 122 infants (82 post-extubation; 21 apnoea; 66 escalation). The median (range) gestational age at birth was 25 + 5 weeks (23 + 1 to 43 + 3 weeks) and median (range) birthweight was 963 g (365-4320 g). At NIV-NAVA application, mean (SD) age was 17 days (18.2), and median (range) weight was 850 g (501-4310 g). Infants did not require intubation within 48 h in 145/169 (85.2%) episodes [72/82 (87.8%) extubation; 21/21 (100%) apnoea; 52/66 (78.8%) escalation).
CONCLUSIONS: NIV-NAVA was successfully integrated for the three main indications (escalation; post-extubation; apnoea). Prospective clinical trials are still required to establish its effectiveness versus other modes of non-invasive support.

UNASSIGNED: NIV (Non-invasive ventilation) and HFNC (High Flow nasal cannula) are being used in patients with acute respiratory failure. HACOR score has been exclusively calculated for patients on NIV, on other hand ROX index is being used for patients on HFNC. This is first study where ROX index has been used in patients on NIV to predict failure.
UNASSIGNED: This study investigates the comparative diagnostic performance of HACOR score and ROX index to predict NIV failure.
UNASSIGNED: We performed a retrospective cohort study of non-invasively ventilated COVID-19 patients admitted between 1st April 2020 to 15th June 2021 to ICU of a tertiary care teaching hospital located in Central India. We assessed factors responsible for NIV failure, and whether these scores HACOR/ROX index have discriminative capacity to predict risk of invasive mechanical ventilation.
UNASSIGNED: Of the 441 patients included in the current study, 179 (40.5%) recovered, while remaining 262 (59.4%) had NIV failure. On multivariable analysis, ROX index > 4.47 was found protective for NIV-failure (OR 0.15 (95% CI 0.03-0.23; p<0.001). Age > 60 years and SOFA score were other significant independent predictors of NIV-failure. The AUC for prediction of failure rises from 0.84 to 0.94 from day 1 to day 3 for ROX index and from 0.79 to 0.92 for HACOR score in the same period, hence ROX score was non-inferior to HACOR score in current study. DeLong\'s test for two correlated ROC curves had insignificant difference expect day-1 (D1: 0.03 to 0.08; p=3.191e-05, D2: -0.002 to 0.02; p = 0.2671, D3: -0.003 to 0.04; p= 0.1065).
UNASSIGNED: ROX score of 4.47 at day-3 consists of good discriminatory capacity to predict NIV failure. Considering its non-inferiority to HACOR score, the ROX score can be used in patients with acute respiratory failure who are on NIV.

High-flow nasal therapy (HFNT) has an increasing role in the management of acute hypoxic respiratory failure. Due to its tolerable interface and ease of use, its role in chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure (CHRF) is emerging. This article examines the literature to date surrounding the short and long-term mechanisms of HFNT in sleep and wakefulness of CHRF patients. It is likely HFNT will have an increasing role in those patients intolerant of non-invasive ventilation.

Telemonitoring in non-invasive ventilation is constantly evolving to enable follow-up of adults and children. Depending on the device and manufacturer, different ventilator variables are displayed on web-based platforms. However, high-granularity measurement is not always available remotely, which precludes breath-by-breath waveforms and precise monitoring of nocturnal gas exchange. Therefore, telemonitoring is mainly useful for monitoring utilization of the device, leaks, and respiratory events. Coordinated relationships between patients, homecare providers, and hospital teams are necessary to transform available data into diagnosis and actions. Telemonitoring is time and cost-consuming. The balance between cost, workload, and clinical benefit should be further evaluated.

Initiation of home non-invasive ventilation (NIV) requires careful consideration of the patient\'s condition, motivation, expectations, wishes, and social circumstances. The decision to start NIV depends on a combination of factors including patient symptoms and objective evidence of nocturnal hypoventilation. A solid understanding of the underlying pathophysiology is key to a systematic and well-balanced clinical approach to titrating NIV. The location where NIV is initiated is not the most relevant issue, provided that it is a comfortable, safe environment in which adequate monitoring can be assured. The majority of patients prefer their own home for treatment initiation.