nail surgery

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    指甲下胆膜囊肿(SOC)是一种罕见的指甲异常,具有不同的临床表现,可以模仿不同的指甲恶性肿瘤。比如黑色素瘤,SCC,或者血管球瘤.皮肤科医生和皮肤病理学家有必要了解这种病理以进行适当的诊断和治疗。SOC是一种罕见的指甲异常,会影响甲床的真皮。SOC有不同的临床表现,包括甲营养不良,脊线,俱乐部,增厚,色素沉着,甚至是正常的外观。它可以模仿不同的指甲恶性肿瘤,比如黑色素瘤,SCC,或者血管球瘤.在这份报告中,我们描述了一名54岁的男性,患有单侧第二指甲甲甲营养不良和甲溶解1年。他最近没有任何创伤史,疼痛,或出血。经手术完全切除。指甲活检有助于SOC的早期诊断和改善治疗效果。
    Subungual Onycholemmal Cyst (SOC) is a rare nail abnormality with different clinical presentations which can mimic different nail malignancies, such as melanoma, SCC, or glomus tumor. It is necessary for dermatologists and dermatopathologist to be aware of this pathology to make the proper diagnosis and treatment. SOC is a rare nail abnormality which affects the dermis of the nail bed. SOC has different clinical presentations, including onychodystrophy, ridging, clubbing, thickening, pigmentation, or even normal appearance. It can mimic different nail malignancies, such as melanoma, SCC, or glomus tumor. In this report, we describe a 54-year-old man with unilateral second right finger nail onychodystrophy and onycholysis for 1 year. He did not have any history of recent trauma, pain, or bleeding. It was completely resected by surgery. Nail biopsy can contribute to the early diagnosis of SOC and improvement of treatment outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:进行指甲手术时,临床医生必须从多种程序和每个程序中的变化中进行选择。已经出版了很多来指导这一决策,但目前还缺乏最新的强有力的系统评价来评估这些证据的总体情况.
    方法:五个数据库(MEDLINE,Embase,CINAHL,WebofScienceandCENTRAL)和两个寄存器(Clinicaltrials.gov和ISRCTN)在2022年1月进行了随机试验,以评估手术干预对向内生长的脚趾甲的影响。两名独立的审稿人筛选了记录,提取的数据,评估证据的偏倚风险和确定性。在我们的第一篇论文中提供了有关症状缓解和症状再生长的共同主要结果的数据。本文提供了次要结果的数据和进一步的讨论。
    结果:在确定的3,928条记录中,36项随机试验纳入系统评价。愈合时间似乎随着苯酚的较短施用而减少。愈合时间的减少也很明显,增加了刮宫,尽管这也可能增加术后出血和疼痛的风险。据报道,接受肾上腺素局部麻醉但没有止血带的患者的术后出血也较低。使用苯酚与甲床切除可以降低感染的风险。使用部分基质切除术和苯酚手术干预时,疼痛评分较低。据报道,酚化和楔形切除术的疼痛持续时间较短。参与者总体满意度较高。
    结论:第二篇论文报告了关于向内生长的脚趾甲手术治疗的随机试验的可靠系统评价的次要结果。尽管针对该主题进行了大量临床试验,由于这些研究的质量差,很少能得出临床结论。需要进一步的高质量临床试验来回答向内生长的脚趾甲的手术治疗中的基本问题。
    BACKGROUND: When performing nail surgery, clinicians must choose from a multitude of procedures and variations within each procedure. Much has been published to guide this decision making, but there are a lack of up to date robust systematic reviews to assess the totality of this evidence.
    METHODS: Five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science and CENTRAL) and two registers (Clinicaltrials.gov and ISRCTN) were searched to January 2022 for randomised trials evaluating the effects of a surgical intervention(s) for ingrown toenails. Two independent reviewers screened records, extracted data, assessed risk of bias and certainty of evidence. Data on co-primary outcomes of symptom relief and symptomatic regrowth were presented in our first paper. This paper presents data for the secondary outcomes and further discussion.
    RESULTS: Of 3,928 records identified, 36 randomised trials were included in the systematic review. Healing time appears to be reduced with shorter application of phenol. A reduced healing time was also apparent was with the addition of curettage, although this may also increase the risk of post-operative bleeding and pain. Post operative bleeding was also reportedly lower in people who received local anaesthetic with epinephrine but no tourniquet. Use of phenol with nail bed excision may decrease the risk of infection. Lower pain scores were reported when using partial matrixectomy and surgical interventions with phenol. Shorter duration of pain was reported with phenolisation and wedge resection. Participant satisfaction was high overall.
    CONCLUSIONS: This second paper reports secondary outcomes from a robust systematic review of randomised trials on surgical treatment of ingrown toenails. Despite the large volume of clinical trials conducted on the topic, few clinical conclusions can be drawn due to the poor quality of these studies. Further high-quality clinical trials are needed to answer fundamental questions in the surgical treatment of ingrown toenails.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:内胎趾甲是一种常见的指甲病理学。当保守治疗无效时,经常使用手术方法。尽管最近有叙述评论,有必要对治疗嵌甲的手术方法进行最新和严格的系统评价.
    方法:五个数据库(MEDLINE,Embase,CINAHL,WebofScienceandCENTRAL)和两个登记册(Clinicaltrials.gov和ISRCTN)在2022年1月进行了随机试验,以评估手术干预对向内生长的脚趾甲的影响,并进行了至少1个月的随访。两名独立的审稿人筛选了记录,提取的数据,评估证据的偏倚风险和确定性。
    结果:在确定的3,928条记录中,36(3,756名参与者;62.7%的男性)外科手术干预被纳入系统评价,31项研究被纳入荟萃分析。有非常低质量的证据表明,使用苯酚的指甲撕脱与不使用苯酚的指甲撕脱可降低复发风险(风险比[RR]0.13[95%CI0.06至0.27],p<0.001)。在化学或手术与保守治疗之间没有观察到有利的效果(0.55[0.19to1.61],p=0.280;0.72[0.33至1.56],p=0.410),化学或外科与其他(例如,CO2激光,电灼)(1.61[0.88至2.95],p=0.120;0.58[0.25至1.37],p=0.220),化学与外科(0.75[0.46至1.21],p=0.230),手术与手术(0.42[0.21至0.85]),化学与化学(0.19[0.01至3.80],p=0.280),外科与外科+化学(3.68[0.20至67.35],p=0.380),化学与外科化学(1.92[0.06至62.30],p=0.710),局部麻醉剂与局部麻醉剂+肾上腺素(1.03[0.22to4.86],p=0.970),化学时间30秒与60秒(2.00[0.19至21.41])或抗生素与无抗生素(0.54[0.12至2.52],p=0.430)。中央趾甲切除术是唯一显着缓解症状的方法(p=0.001),但数据仅在手术后8周内可用。
    结论:尽管出版物数量众多,研究质量较差,可从现有试验推断的结论有限.指甲基质的酚化似乎可以降低指甲消融后复发的风险。并且不太确定1分钟似乎是应用的最佳时间。尽管这是一个广泛执行的程序,但仍然缺乏高质量的证据来指导实践。
    BACKGROUND: Ingrown toenails are a common nail pathology. When conservative treatments are ineffective, a surgical approach is often utilised. Despite recent narrative reviews, there is a need for an up-to-date and rigorous systematic review of surgical methods for treating ingrown toenails.
    METHODS: Five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science and CENTRAL) and two registers (Clinicaltrials.gov and ISRCTN) were searched to January 2022 for randomised trials evaluating the effects of a surgical intervention(s) for ingrown toenails with a follow-up of at least 1 month. Two independent reviewers screened records, extracted data, assessed risk of bias and certainty of evidence.
    RESULTS: Of 3,928 records identified, 36 (3,756 participants; 62.7% males) surgical interventions were included in the systematic review and 31 studies in the meta-analysis. There was very low quality evidence that using phenol with nail avulsion vs nail avulsion without phenol reduces the risk of recurrence (risk ratio [RR] 0.13 [95% CI 0.06 to 0.27], p < 0.001). No favourable effect was observed between chemical or surgical vs conservative management (0.55 [0.19 to 1.61], p = 0.280; 0.72 [0.33 to 1.56], p = 0.410), chemical or surgical vs other (e.g., CO2 laser, electrocautery) (1.61 [0.88 to 2.95], p = 0.120; 0.58 [0.25 to 1.37], p = 0.220), chemical vs surgical (0.75 [0.46 to 1.21], p = 0.230), surgical vs surgical (0.42 [0.21 to 0.85]), chemical vs chemical (0.19 [0.01 to 3.80], p = 0.280), surgical vs surgical + chemical (3.68 [0.20 to 67.35], p = 0.380), chemical vs surgical + chemical (1.92 [0.06 to 62.30], p = 0.710), local anaesthetic vs local anaesthetic + adrenaline (1.03 [0.22 to 4.86], p = 0.970), chemical timings 30 s vs 60 s (2.00 [0.19 to 21.41]) or antibiotics vs no antibiotics (0.54 [0.12 to 2.52], p = 0.430). Central toenail resection was the only procedure to significantly relieve symptoms (p = 0.001) but data were only available up to 8 weeks post-surgery.
    CONCLUSIONS: Despite the high number of publications, the quality of research was poor and the conclusions that can be inferred from existing trials is limited. Phenolisation of the nail matrix appears to reduce the risk of recurrence following nail ablation, and with less certainty 1 min appears to be the optimum time for application. Despite this being a widely performed procedure there remains a lack of good quality evidence to guide practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    牙本质瘤是指甲基质的原发性良性肿瘤。目前,报告的病例数量有限,所以它仍然被认为是一种罕见的肿瘤。然而,如果这种情况被诊断不足和报道不足,这是值得商榷的。甲癣是甲癣的重要鉴别诊断,有时,这两种情况甚至可能共存于同一指甲中。随着肿瘤的生长,组织微环境更容易受到皮肤癣菌的影响。可能,改变的角蛋白似乎易受真菌侵袭。仔细的临床评估和皮肤镜评估有助于确定诊断。通常,当它们共存时,完全指甲撕脱是首选的治疗方法。在这里,我们介绍了一例患有甲癣和甲癣的中年妇女,影响了单个指甲。建议的治疗方法是口服特比萘芬6个月,然后进行保守手术。真菌治疗后,皮肤镜特征发生了戏剧性的变化,which,根据我们的知识,以前没有报道过。
    Onychomatricoma is a primary benign neoplasm of the nail matrix. Currently, a limited number of cases have been reported, so it is still considered a rare neoplasia. However, it is debatable if this condition is underdiagnosed and underreported. Onychomycosis is an important differential diagnosis of onychomatricoma, and sometimes, both these conditions may even coexist in the same nail. As the tumor grows, tissue microenvironment is more vulnerable to dermatophytes. Probably, the altered keratin appears to be susceptible to fungal invasion. Careful clinical assessment and dermoscopic evaluation help nailing the diagnosis. Usually, total nail avulsion is the preferred therapeutic approach when they coexist. Herein, we present a case of a middle-aged woman with onychomycosis and onychomatricoma affecting a single fingernail. The proposed therapy was oral terbinafine for 6 months followed by a conservative surgery. There were dramatic changes in dermoscopic features after fungal treatment, which, to our knowledge, have not been previously reported.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号