medical training

医学培训
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于与艰苦的工作时间表相关的不孕症医生的经验越来越高,因此不孕症医生已成为一个日益关注的问题。环境暴露,由于他们需要多年的培训,推迟了计划生育。幸运的是,意识有所提高,倡导,以及与这种次优协会一起提供机构支持的紧迫性。这种意识反映在关于内科医生不孕症的大量现有文献中;在这篇范围审查中,我们汇总并评估了当前数据以及现有研究中发现的差距.包括56篇关于医生不孕症现状的各个方面的文章,我们汇编和综合了现有数据,以了解不孕症在医生计划生育中的作用,包括对外科医生的具体分析和男女医生的比较。我们从财政和后勤方面讨论了人工生殖技术对这一人群的利用和缺点,促成了这种复杂,直到最近,被忽视的问题。最后,我们报道了许多针对医学培训计划的建议,以帮助解决复杂的内科医生不孕症问题。
    Physician infertility has become a growing concern because of the increasingly high rates of infertility physicians experience associated with their strenuous work schedules, environmental exposures, and delayed family planning due to their necessitated years of training. Fortunately, there has been an increase in awareness, advocacy, and urgency for institutional support alongside this suboptimal association. This awareness is reflected in the vast existing literature regarding physician infertility; in this scoping review, we aggregated and assessed the current data as well as identified gaps in the available research. Including 56 articles regarding various aspects of the current state of physician infertility, we compiled and synthesized the available data to understand the role of infertility in physician family planning, including specific analyses for surgeons and comparisons of male and female physicians. We discussed the utilization and downsides of artificial reproductive technologies for this population in terms of finances and logistics, contributing to this complex and, until recently, neglected issue. Lastly, we reported on a multitude of suggestions aimed at medical training programs to help combat the complex issue of physician infertility.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在医学教育中,虚拟现实(VR)等新技术越来越多地集成以增强数字学习。最初用于训练外科手术,现在的用例还包括紧急情况和非技术技能,如临床决策。这篇范围审查旨在概述VR在医学教育中的应用,包括要求,优势,缺点,以及评估方法和各自的研究结果,为未来VR融入医学课程奠定基础。
    方法:本审查遵循更新的JBI范围审查方法,并遵守各自的PRISMA扩展。我们纳入了2012年至2022年3月的英语或德语评论,以检查VR在医学和护理学生教育中的使用情况。注册护士,和合格的医生。数据提取集中在医学专业,主题,课程,技术/教学要求,评估方法和研究结果以及VR的优缺点。
    结果:共确定了763条记录。资格评估后,共纳入69项研究。其中近一半在2021年至2022年期间出版,主要来自高收入国家。大多数评论集中在腹腔镜和微创手术的手术培训(43.5%),并包括以合格医师为参与者的研究(43.5%)。技术,强调了教学和组织要求,并对表演时间和质量进行了评估,技能获取和有效性,经常表现出积极的结果。可访问性,重复性,成本效益,和改进的技能发展被报道为优势,在财务挑战的同时,技术限制,缺乏科学证据,和潜在的用户不适被认为是缺点。
    结论:尽管VR在医学教育中具有很高的潜力,将其纳入医学课程有强制性要求,以解决与财务相关的挑战,技术限制,和说教方面。据报道,缺乏评估VR培训的标准化和验证指南必须克服,以便为VR在医学教育中的使用提供高质量的证据。软件开发人员的跨学科团队,AI专家,设计师,医学教学专家和最终用户需要设计有用的VR课程。技术问题和妥协的现实主义可以通过进一步的技术进步来缓解。
    BACKGROUND: In medical education, new technologies like Virtual Reality (VR) are increasingly integrated to enhance digital learning. Originally used to train surgical procedures, now use cases also cover emergency scenarios and non-technical skills like clinical decision-making. This scoping review aims to provide an overview of VR in medical education, including requirements, advantages, disadvantages, as well as evaluation methods and respective study results to establish a foundation for future VR integration into medical curricula.
    METHODS: This review follows the updated JBI methodology for scoping reviews and adheres to the respective PRISMA extension. We included reviews in English or German language from 2012 to March 2022 that examine the use of VR in education for medical and nursing students, registered nurses, and qualified physicians. Data extraction focused on medical specialties, subjects, curricula, technical/didactic requirements, evaluation methods and study outcomes as well as advantages and disadvantages of VR.
    RESULTS: A total of 763 records were identified. After eligibility assessment, 69 studies were included. Nearly half of them were published between 2021 and 2022, predominantly from high-income countries. Most reviews focused on surgical training in laparoscopic and minimally invasive procedures (43.5%) and included studies with qualified physicians as participants (43.5%). Technical, didactic and organisational requirements were highlighted and evaluations covering performance time and quality, skills acquisition and validity, often showed positive outcomes. Accessibility, repeatability, cost-effectiveness, and improved skill development were reported as advantages, while financial challenges, technical limitations, lack of scientific evidence, and potential user discomfort were cited as disadvantages.
    CONCLUSIONS: Despite a high potential of VR in medical education, there are mandatory requirements for its integration into medical curricula addressing challenges related to finances, technical limitations, and didactic aspects. The reported lack of standardised and validated guidelines for evaluating VR training must be overcome to enable high-quality evidence for VR usage in medical education. Interdisciplinary teams of software developers, AI experts, designers, medical didactics experts and end users are required to design useful VR courses. Technical issues and compromised realism can be mitigated by further technological advancements.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:三维(3D)内窥镜检查已被开发用于提供深度感知,以改善耳鼻咽喉科手术期间的可视化。我们进行了系统评价,以确定3D内窥镜在执行耳鼻喉科手术中与二维(2D)内窥镜检查相比的手术安全性和有效性。以及3D内窥镜作为新手耳鼻喉科外科医生培训工具的作用。
    方法:主要研究通过MEDLINE,Embase和WebofScience数据库,搜索了截至2022年6月发表的文章,这些文章比较了2D和3D内窥镜检查在耳鼻咽喉科外科手术或耳鼻咽喉科相关模拟中的结果。候选文章由两名作者独立审查。
    结果:共有18篇全文文章符合本研究的纳入标准。在临床试验中(n=8项研究,362科目),表演时间没有显著差异,与2D相比,3D内窥镜的术中或术后并发症。在模拟研究中(n=10个研究,336名参与者),3D内窥镜显示出较低的错误率(n=5项研究)和较短的性能时间(n=3项研究)。研究还报告了3D优于2D系统的深度感知(n=14项研究)和可视化偏好(n=5项研究)。发现3D系统在新手外科医生中具有更短的学习曲线和更好的可操作性。
    结论:在耳鼻咽喉科手术中,与2D内窥镜相比,3D内窥镜显示出同等的安全性和有效性。使用3D内窥镜的新手的改进的深度感知和性能表明,该技术可能优于2D内窥镜作为耳鼻喉科外科医生的培训工具。
    OBJECTIVE: Three-dimensional (3D) endoscopy has been developed to provide depth perception to allow for improved visualisation during otolaryngology surgery. We conducted a systematic review to determine the surgical safety and efficacy of 3D endoscopy in comparison to two-dimensional (2D) endoscopy in performing otolaryngology procedures, and the role of 3D endoscopy as a training tool for novice otolaryngology surgeons.
    METHODS: Primary studies were identified through MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science databases, which were searched for articles published through June 2022 that compared the outcomes of 2D and 3D endoscopy in otolaryngology surgical procedures or otolaryngology-relevant simulations. Candidate articles were independently reviewed by two authors.
    RESULTS: A total of 18 full-text articles met inclusion criteria for this study. In clinical trials (n = 8 studies, 362 subjects), there were no significant differences in performance time, intraoperative or postoperative complications with 3D endoscopes when compared to 2D. In simulation studies (n = 10 studies, 336 participants), 3D endoscopes demonstrated a decreased error rate (n = 5 studies) and shorter performance time (n = 3 studies). Studies also reported improved depth perception (n = 14 studies) and visualisation preference (n = 5 studies) with 3D over 2D systems. The 3D systems were found to have a shorter learning curve and better manoeuvrability among novice surgeons.
    CONCLUSIONS: 3D endoscopy showed equivalent safety and efficacy compared to 2D endoscopy in otolaryngology surgery. The improved depth perception and performance for novices using 3D endoscopes suggests the technology may be superior to 2D endoscopes as a training tool for otolaryngology surgeons.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:人工智能(AI),更具体地说,大型语言模型(LLM),通过优化临床工作流程和提高决策质量,在彻底改变急诊护理提供方面具有巨大潜力。尽管将LLM整合到急诊医学(EM)中的热情正在增长,现有文献的特点是不同的个体研究集合,概念分析,和初步实施。鉴于这些复杂性和理解上的差距,需要一个有凝聚力的框架来理解现有的关于在EM中应用LLM的知识体系。
    目标:鉴于缺乏全面的框架来探索LLM在EM中的作用,本范围审查旨在系统地绘制有关EM中LLM的潜在应用的现有文献,并确定未来研究的方向。解决这一差距将有助于在实地取得知情进展。
    方法:使用PRISMA-ScR(系统审查的首选报告项目和范围审查的荟萃分析扩展)标准,我们搜索了OvidMEDLINE,Embase,WebofScience,和谷歌学者在2018年1月至2023年8月之间发表的论文中讨论了LLM在EM中的使用。我们排除了其他形式的AI。总共筛选了1994年的独特标题和摘要,每篇全文由2名作者独立审查。数据是独立提取的,5位作者对数据进行了定量和定性的协同合成。
    结果:共纳入43篇论文。研究主要从2022年到2023年,在美国和中国进行。我们发现了四个主要主题:(1)临床决策和支持被强调为关键领域,LLM在加强患者护理方面发挥着重要作用,特别是通过它们在实时分诊中的应用,允许早期识别患者的紧迫性;(2)效率,工作流,和信息管理证明了LLM显著提高运营效率的能力,特别是通过病人记录合成的自动化,这可以减轻行政负担,加强以患者为中心的护理;(3)风险,伦理,透明度被确定为关注领域,特别是关于LLM输出的可靠性,具体研究强调了在潜在有缺陷的训练数据集中确保无偏见决策的挑战,强调彻底验证和道德监督的重要性;(4)教育和沟通的可能性包括法学硕士丰富医学培训的能力,例如通过使用增强沟通技巧的模拟患者互动。
    结论:LLM有可能从根本上改变EM,加强临床决策,优化工作流,改善患者预后。这篇综述通过确定关键研究领域为未来的进步奠定了基础:LLM应用的前瞻性验证,建立负责任使用的标准,理解提供者和患者的看法,提高医生的人工智能素养。有效地将LLM集成到EM中需要协作努力和全面评估,以确保这些技术能够安全有效地应用。
    BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI), more specifically large language models (LLMs), holds significant potential in revolutionizing emergency care delivery by optimizing clinical workflows and enhancing the quality of decision-making. Although enthusiasm for integrating LLMs into emergency medicine (EM) is growing, the existing literature is characterized by a disparate collection of individual studies, conceptual analyses, and preliminary implementations. Given these complexities and gaps in understanding, a cohesive framework is needed to comprehend the existing body of knowledge on the application of LLMs in EM.
    OBJECTIVE: Given the absence of a comprehensive framework for exploring the roles of LLMs in EM, this scoping review aims to systematically map the existing literature on LLMs\' potential applications within EM and identify directions for future research. Addressing this gap will allow for informed advancements in the field.
    METHODS: Using PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) criteria, we searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for papers published between January 2018 and August 2023 that discussed LLMs\' use in EM. We excluded other forms of AI. A total of 1994 unique titles and abstracts were screened, and each full-text paper was independently reviewed by 2 authors. Data were abstracted independently, and 5 authors performed a collaborative quantitative and qualitative synthesis of the data.
    RESULTS: A total of 43 papers were included. Studies were predominantly from 2022 to 2023 and conducted in the United States and China. We uncovered four major themes: (1) clinical decision-making and support was highlighted as a pivotal area, with LLMs playing a substantial role in enhancing patient care, notably through their application in real-time triage, allowing early recognition of patient urgency; (2) efficiency, workflow, and information management demonstrated the capacity of LLMs to significantly boost operational efficiency, particularly through the automation of patient record synthesis, which could reduce administrative burden and enhance patient-centric care; (3) risks, ethics, and transparency were identified as areas of concern, especially regarding the reliability of LLMs\' outputs, and specific studies highlighted the challenges of ensuring unbiased decision-making amidst potentially flawed training data sets, stressing the importance of thorough validation and ethical oversight; and (4) education and communication possibilities included LLMs\' capacity to enrich medical training, such as through using simulated patient interactions that enhance communication skills.
    CONCLUSIONS: LLMs have the potential to fundamentally transform EM, enhancing clinical decision-making, optimizing workflows, and improving patient outcomes. This review sets the stage for future advancements by identifying key research areas: prospective validation of LLM applications, establishing standards for responsible use, understanding provider and patient perceptions, and improving physicians\' AI literacy. Effective integration of LLMs into EM will require collaborative efforts and thorough evaluation to ensure these technologies can be safely and effectively applied.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    简介:COVID-19大流行极大地影响了全球卫生工作者的临床教育和培训,对医疗机构的学习环境造成严重破坏,并限制了新临床技能的获取。因此,紧急适应措施,包括模拟训练和电子学习,已实施以减轻临床教育的不利影响。这项范围审查旨在评估COVID-19对医学教育和培训的影响,检查已实施的适应措施,并评估其在大流行期间改善卫生工作者教育和培训的有效性。方法:采用PRISMA-ScR框架和Arksey和O\'Malley的方法论指导,我们进行了范围审查,系统地搜索PubMed,medRxiv,Google,和DuckDuckGo数据库来解释灰色文献。该搜索包括2019年12月1日至2021年10月13日之间发表的研究,产生了10,323个结果。其中,88项研究侧重于大流行期间卫生工作者的教育和培训。结果:我们的综述纳入了31,268名参与者,包括医生,医疗学员,护士,护理人员,学生,和健康教育工作者。大多数研究(71/88,81%)是在高收入和中低收入国家进行的。大流行对卫生工作者的临床技能和能力的影响在某些情况下需要延长培训期。我们确定了实施模拟训练和电子学习作为适应策略的几个积极成果,如提高技术和临床表现,增加信心和舒适度,以及扩大的全球教育推广。结论:尽管面临实践经验不足等挑战,有限的人际交往机会,和互联网连接问题,模拟训练,电子学习,和虚拟培训已被证明在COVID-19大流行期间有效改善临床教育和培训。需要进一步的研究来加强对未来大流行或类似情况的准备。
    Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has considerably impacted the clinical education and training of health workers globally, causing severe disruptions to learning environments in healthcare facilities and limiting the acquisition of new clinical skills. Consequently, urgent adaptation measures, including simulation training and e-learning, have been implemented to mitigate the adverse effects of clinical education. This scoping review aims to assess the impact of COVID-19 on medical education and training, examine the implemented adaptation measures, and evaluate their effectiveness in improving health workers\' education and training during the pandemic. Methods: Employing the PRISMA-ScR framework and Arksey and O\'Malley\'s methodological guidance, we conducted a scoping review, systematically searching PubMed, medRxiv, Google, and DuckDuckGo databases to account for the grey literature. The search included studies published between 1 December 2019 and 13 October 2021, yielding 10,323 results. Of these, 88 studies focused on health worker education and training during the pandemic. Results: Our review incorporated 31,268 participants, including physicians, medical trainees, nurses, paramedics, students, and health educators. Most studies (71/88, 81%) were conducted in high-income and lower-middle-income countries. The pandemic\'s effects on health workers\' clinical skills and abilities have necessitated training period extensions in some cases. We identified several positive outcomes from the implementation of simulation training and e-learning as adaptation strategies, such as enhanced technical and clinical performance, increased confidence and comfort, and an expanded global educational outreach. Conclusions: Despite challenges like insufficient practical experience, limited interpersonal interaction opportunities, and internet connectivity issues, simulation training, e-learning, and virtual training have proven effective in improving clinical education and training during the COVID-19 pandemic. Further research is required to bolster preparedness for future pandemics or similar situations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    虚拟现实(VR)领域的最新技术进步为更广泛地将VR用作医学生和从业者的培训平台创造了新的机会。尽管人们对使用VR作为培训工具的兴趣日益浓厚,医学教育VR培训中一个常见的差距是对应用程序长期有效性的信心。进行了系统的文献综述,以探索VR(特别是头戴式显示器)在医学培训中的应用范围,并将重点放在验证措施上。这篇综述中包含的论文讨论了具体应用的实证案例研究;然而,这些研究主要涉及人机交互,并且在证明概念性技术解决方案对于模拟是可行的,或者研究VR可用性的特定领域,很少讨论长期训练有效性和结果的验证措施.审查发现了技术供应商方面的广泛的临时应用和研究,环境,任务,设想的用户和学习成果的有效性。这给那些寻求通过的人带来了决策挑战,在教学实践中实施和嵌入这些系统。然后,本文的作者从更广泛的社会技术系统的角度来了解如何将整体培训系统设计和有效验证为适合目的,通过从文献综述中提炼一组通用要求,以帮助设计规范和实施,并推动对这些类型的系统进行更明智和可追踪的验证。在这次审查中,我们已经确定了11个关键领域的92个需求声明,可以验证VR-HMD培训系统;这些被分组为设计考虑因素,学习机制和实施注意事项。
    The latest technological advancements in the domain of virtual reality (VR) have created new opportunities to use VR as a training platform for medical students and practitioners more broadly. Despite the growing interest in the use of VR as a training tool, a commonly identified gap in VR-training for medical education is the confidence in the long-term validity of the applications. A systematic literature review was undertaken to explore the extent of VR (in particular head-mounted displays) applications for medical training with an additional focus on validation measures. The papers included in this review discussed empirical case studies of specific applications; however, these were mostly concerned with human-computer interaction and were polarized between demonstrating that a conceptual technology solution was feasible for simulation or looked at specific areas of VR usability with little discussion on validation measures for long-term training effectiveness and outcomes. The review uncovered a wide range of ad hoc applications and studies in terms of technology vendors, environments, tasks, envisaged users and effectiveness of learning outcomes. This presents decision-making challenges for those seeking to adopt, implement and embed such systems in teaching practice. The authors of this paper then take a wider socio-technical systems perspective to understand how the holistic training system can be engineered and validated effectively as fit for purpose, through distillation of a generic set of requirements from the literature review to aid design specification and implementation, and to drive more informed and traceable validation of these types of systems. In this review, we have identified 92 requirement statements in 11 key areas against which a VR-HMD training system could be validated; these were grouped into design considerations, learning mechanisms and implementation considerations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:由于医学课程越来越关注临床决策技能,不断开发新的学习工具。虚拟现实(VR)是新兴技术之一,具有改善卫生专业人员教育的潜力。具有可重复训练场景的高度逼真的学习体验可以在独立于真实患者存在的受保护的环境中创建。我们的项目“医疗TR。AI.Ning\“遵循这种方法,旨在用智能模拟身临其境的虚拟第一人称场景,可交互的虚拟患者。到目前为止,VR主要应用于外科训练,但是有证据表明训练不同的程序技能是有效的,比如心肺复苏,知识获取,以及推理和创造力的提高,同时仍然具有成本效益。本范围审查的目的是探索VR在医学教育领域的应用并确定关键领域。此外,相应的要求,评价方法和结果,优势,和缺点将被覆盖。
    方法:此范围审查协议实现了更新的JBI范围审查方法。2022年3月,两名独立审稿人在PubMed进行了初步文献研究,以完善搜索词和策略以及方案的纳入标准。核算现实性和科学性。最终搜索将使用PubMed进行,ScienceDirect,科克伦图书馆,WebofScience核心合集,和JBI证据综合。搜索,研究筛选,和数据提取将由两个审阅者并行和独立地完成。差异将通过协商一致或咨询第三位评论作者来处理。
    结论:通过这次范围审查,我们预期在使用透明且可重复的搜索策略的同时,整理VR在医学教育中的应用范围.这可能有助于设计和开发新颖的教育VR平台,并将其集成到医学课程中,同时指出以前的遗漏和陷阱。
    Due to an increasing focus of medical curricula on clinical decision-making skills, new learning tools are constantly developed. Virtual reality (VR) is one of the emerging technologies with the potential to improve health professionals\' education. Highly realistic learning experiences with repeatable training scenarios can be created within a protected environment that is independent from real patients\' presence. Our project \"medical tr.AI.ning\" is following this approach aiming to simulate immersive virtual first-person scenarios with intelligent, interactable virtual patients. So far, VR has been mainly used in surgical training, but there is evidence for effectiveness in training different procedural skills, such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation, knowledge acquisition, and improvement of reasoning and creativity, while still being cost-effective. The objective of this scoping review is to explore the usage and identify key areas of VR applications in the field of medical education. Furthermore, the corresponding requirements, evaluation methods and outcomes, advantages, and disadvantages will be covered.
    This scoping review protocol implements the updated JBI Scoping Review Methodology. In March 2022, a preliminary literature research in PubMed was performed by two independent reviewers to refine search terms and strategy as well as inclusion criteria of the protocol, accounting for actuality and scientific relevance. The final search will be conducted using PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, Web of Science Core Collection, and JBI Evidence Synthesis. Search, study screening, and data extraction will be done in parallel and independently by two reviewers. Discrepancies will be handled by consensus or consulting a third review author.
    With this scoping review, we anticipate collating the range of application of VR in medical education while using a transparent and reproducible search strategy. This may contribute to the design and development of novel educational VR platforms and their integration into medical curricula while pointing out previous omissions and pitfalls.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:关于眼科虚拟监督(VS)的公开信息没有得到很好的描述。本范围审查描述了VS在眼科实践和教育中的证据和潜在作用。
    方法:根据系统评价的首选报告项目和范围评价的Meta分析扩展(PRISMA-ScR)制定了文献检索策略。我们纳入了在英语同行评审期刊上发表的全文文章,该期刊涉及眼科医师-医师或医师-实习生VS。我们排除了直接(亲自)监督的研究。两名研究者独立地从每篇文章中提取发表年份和研究地点,设计,参与者特征,样本量,和结果。我们使用混合方法评估工具(MMAT)评估了研究的方法学质量。
    结果:我们的定性合成中包含了七篇文章。监督者的范围从医生,例如眼科外科医生和全科医生,到医疗学员,例如眼科住院医师,玻璃体视网膜研究员,和急诊医学居民。研究设置包括急诊科,手术室,眼科诊所,和一所乡村医院。所有研究都报告了临床检查和手术或办公室程序的实时图像或视频的成功传输。在VS期间使用各种方法来确保高图像和视频质量,尽管仍然存在一些技术挑战。MMAT评级揭示了结果测量的局限性,统计分析,抽样策略,并纳入混杂因素。
    结论:眼科虚拟监督在技术上是可行的,可以同步通信和传输临床数据,可用于制定诊断和管理计划并学习新的手术技能。具有更大样本量和强大研究设计的未来研究应调查使VS在眼科实践和教育中有效的因素。
    OBJECTIVE: The published information on virtual supervision (VS) in ophthalmology is not well described. This scoping review describes the evidence and potential role for VS in ophthalmic practice and education.
    METHODS: A literature search strategy was developed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). We included full-text articles published in an English-language peer-reviewed journal that involved physician-physician or physician-trainee VS in ophthalmology. We excluded studies with direct (in-person) supervision. Two investigators independently extracted from each article the year of publication and study location, design, participant characteristics, sample size, and outcomes. We appraised the methodological quality of the studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).
    RESULTS: Seven articles were included in our qualitative synthesis. Supervisees ranged from physicians such as an ophthalmic surgeon and a general practitioner to medical trainees such as ophthalmology residents, vitreoretinal fellows, and emergency medicine residents. Study settings included emergency departments, operating rooms, eye clinics, and a rural hospital. All studies reported successful transmission of real-time images or videos of clinical examinations and surgical or in-office procedures. Various methods were used to ensure high image and video quality during VS, although some technical challenges remained. MMAT ratings revealed limitations in outcome measurement, statistical analysis, sampling strategy, and inclusion of confounding factors.
    CONCLUSIONS: Virtual supervision in ophthalmology is technologically feasible and permits synchronous communication and transmission of clinical data, which can be used to formulate diagnostic and management plans and learn new surgical skills. Future studies with larger sample sizes and robust study designs should investigate factors that make VS effective in ophthalmic practice and education.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:虚拟现实(VR)作为一种新兴和发展中的技术,在医疗保健领域受到了广泛关注,并培训了不同的医疗团体。实施心脏外科专业培训是与临床培训相关的最危险和最敏感的问题之一。已经进行了使用该技术来训练心脏住院医师的研究。本研究旨在确定VR技术在心脏病学干预培训中的作用和特点。方法:这项范围审查是在2021年通过搜索PubMed,Scopus,和WebofSciences科学数据库通过组合相关的关键词。数据提取表单用于数据收集。通过内容分析法进行数据分析,并根据研究目标报告结果.结果:包括21项研究;从最初搜索中发现的777篇文章中,7项(33.33%)为RCT研究。近年来,基于VR的心脏病学干预教育研究显着增长。应用VR的主要效果包括改善用户态度和满意度,改进了VR训练后的性能,改进培训和学习。输入设备包括跟踪设备,点输入设备,和控制器。输出设备分为三个主要类别,包括图形音频和触觉。结论:新技术的运用,尤其是VR,可以提高临床医疗培训的效率。它建议这项技术在进行真正的手术之前,对心脏住院医师进行心脏手术的必要技能培训,以减少潜在的风险和医疗错误。
    Background: Virtual Reality (VR) as an emerging and developing technology has received much attention in healthcare and trained different medical groups. Implementing specialized training in cardiac surgery is one of the riskiest and most sensitive issues related to clinical training. Studies have been conducted to train cardiac residents using this technology. This study aimed to identify the effects and features of VR technology in cardiology interventions training. Methods: This scoping review was conducted in 2021 by searching PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Sciences scientific databases by combining the related keywords. A data extraction form was used for data gathering. Data analyses were done through the content analysis method, and results were reported based on the study objectives. Results: 21 studies were included; from the 777 articles found in the initial searches, seven (33.33%) were RCT studies. VR-based education studies in cardiology interventions have grown significantly in recent years. The main effects of applying VR include improved user attitude and satisfaction, improved performance after VR training, and improved training and learning. Input devices include tracking devices, point input devices, and controllers. Output devices were three main categories include graphics audios and haptic. Conclusion: The use of new technologies, especially VR, can improve the efficiency of medical training in clinical settings. It recommends that this technology train the necessary skills for heart surgery in cardiac residents before performing real surgery to reduce the potential risks and medical errors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号