BACKGROUND: Elderly living kidney donors (LKDs) are becoming increasingly important in countries with a high prevalence of living-donor kidney transplants and an aging society. This study explored the features of elderly LKDs, focusing on their subsequent outcomes.
METHODS: This single-center, retrospective, observational study included eligible LKDs who donated their kidneys between April 2008 and July 2022. LKDs were categorized into an elderly (≥70 years at donation) or a non-elderly group (<70 years). We examined pre-operative characteristics and post-operative outcomes, such as kidney function, complications, development of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), and mortality.
RESULTS: Of the 188 LKDs observed for a median of 5.7 years, 31 were in the elderly group (16.5%) and 157 (83.5%) were in the non-elderly group (mean age 72.5 ± 2.7 and 58.2 ± 7.3 years, respectively). No significant differences were observed in hospital stay length or peri-operative complications between groups. Both groups experienced a similar decline in post-donation estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)-approximately 37%. In the elderly group, four LKDs died, and one progressed to ESKD. In the non-elderly group, two LKDs died, and none progressed to ESKD. The cause of death was not strongly suspected to be associated with the donation.
CONCLUSIONS: eGFR was maintained even in elderly LKDs post-donation. Prioritizing LKDs\' safety is paramount; however, donations from elderly people would be acceptable, considering their life expectancy. This can expand the pool of living kidney donors and address the growing demand for kidney transplants.

UNASSIGNED: Living kidney donors (LKDs) experience perioperative anxiety. We designed the following study to evaluate the anxiolytic effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) during the perioperative period in a group of LKDs undergoing laparotomy nephrectomy.
UNASSIGNED: LKDs were randomly assigned to either the TEAS or control group. Participants in the TEAS group received 30min of intervention (6-15 mA, 2-100 Hz), at Yintang (EX-HN-3), bilateral Taichong (LR3) and Neiguan (PC6) one day before surgery (D0), before induction of anesthesia (D1) and one day after surgery (D2). The participants in the control group received the same placement of electrodes but without electrical stimulation. Venous blood was collected before each intervention. Anxiety levels and recovery profiles were recorded.
UNASSIGNED: LKDs in the TEAS group had lower anxiety level than those in the control group at D1, D2 and three days after surgery (D3). The percentage differences were: 33.3%, 25.0%, and 22.2%; [95% confidence interval (CI), (-55.1%, -11.6%), (-47.4%, -2.6%), and (-42.3%, -2.2%); P = 0.005, P = 0.034, and P = 0.035; respectively]. LKDs who received TEAS had better sleep quality and short-term recovery profiles than those in the control group. The plasma levels of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) and melatonin (MT) in the TEAS group were significantly higher than those in the control group at D1 and D2 (5-HT: P = 0.001, and P < 0.001; MT: P = 0.006, and P = 0.001). At the 3-month follow up, fewer LKDs in the TEAS group had incisional pain when compared to the control group (P = 0.032).
UNASSIGNED: Perioperative TEAS decreased perioperative anxiety and facilitated postoperative recovery in the LKDs, and potential decreased the development of chronic pain. Trial Registration: Registered at ChiCTR2000029891, http://www.chictr.org.cn/listbycreater.aspx.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (HALDN) is widely performed to minimize burden on living kidney donors. However, hand port-site infections after HALDN may occur. This study aimed to assess the impact of donor characteristics including preoperative comorbidities and operative factors on hand port-site infection after HALDN.
In this single-center, retrospective cohort study, 1,260 consecutive HALDNs for living-donor kidney transplantation performed between January 2008 and December 2021 were evaluated. All living donors met the living kidney donor guidelines in Japan. Hand port-site infections were identified in 88 HALDN cases (7.0%). To investigate risk factors for hand port-site infection, donor characteristics including preoperative comorbidities such as hypertension, glucose intolerance, dyslipidemia, obesity, and operative factors such as operative duration, blood loss, preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis, and prophylactic subcutaneous suction drain placement at the hand port-site were analyzed using logistic regression analysis.
In the multivariate analysis, significant differences were identified regarding sex (P = 0.021; odds ratio [OR], 1.971; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.108-3.507), preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis (P < 0.001; OR, 0.037; 95% CI [0.011-0.127]), and prophylactic subcutaneous suction drain placement at the hand port-site (P = 0.041; OR, 2.005; 95% CI [1.029-3.907]). However, a significant difference was not identified regarding glucose intolerance (P = 0.572; OR, 1.148; 95% CI [0.711-1.856]). Preoperative comorbidities may not cause hand port-site infections within the donors who meet the living kidney donor guidelines. Preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis is crucial in preventing hand port-site infection, whereas prophylactic subcutaneous suction drain placement may increase the risk of hand port-site infection.

Patients who need a live donor kidney transplant (LDKT) must often ask potential donors (PLDs) themselves. This is a difficult task and healthcare could unburden them by making this first contact, ensuring also that PLDs receive correct information. We investigated how PLDs experience receiving a letter from healthcare about LDKT, live kidney donation, and inviting them to meet with professionals to get more information.
The letter (LD-letter) was sent to a cohort of 46 individuals, from which a purposeful sample of 15 were interviewed using a semi-structured guide covering their experience of the letter, views on being approached by healthcare, and opinions on style and content. Interviews were analyzed using conventional inductive analysis.
We identified three categories of experiences: Category (1) Reflections on receiving the letter, contains three subcategories relating to how the letter did not induce pressure to donate, did not affect the PLD\'s relationship with the patient with kidney disease, and made the letter-receiver feel important in the transplant process; Category (2) The letter creates clarification and trust, also contains three subcategories, relating to how it clarified the voluntariness of donation and neutrality of healthcare providers with respect to the PLD\'s decision, elucidated the patient with kidney disease\'s current stage of disease (where transplantation was approaching), and unburdened patients from the responsibility of contacting PLDs on their own; Category (3) Opinions and suggestions about the letter and further communication, with four subcategories, relating to preference of a letter as the first step for communication about LDKT, suggestions on style and content, views on following up the letter, and how open meetings about LDKT were an important information source. Furthermore, 80% of the interviewees found the letter\'s information comprehensive, 67% found it easy to read and respectful, and 86% rated it as good or very good.
Potential donors prefer and recommend a letter as the first step for communication regarding LD. The LD-letter unburdens patients from the task of asking PLDs and stresses the voluntariness of donation, does not leave PLDs feeling coerced or lead to negative effects in their relationship with the patient.

BACKGROUND: While living kidney donation is considered safe in healthy individuals, perioperative complications can occur due to several factors.
OBJECTIVE: We explored associations between the incidence of perioperative complications and donor characteristics, surgical technique, and surgeon\'s experience in a large contemporary cohort of living kidney donors.
METHODS: Living kidney donors enrolled prospectively in a multicenter cohort study with some data collected retrospectively after enrollment was complete (eg, surgeon characteristics).
METHODS: Living kidney donor centers in Canada (n = 12) and Australia (n = 5).
METHODS: Living kidney donors who donated between 2004 and 2014 and the surgeons who performed the living kidney donor nephrectomies.
METHODS: Operative and hospital discharge medical notes were collected prospectively, with data on perioperative (intraoperative and postoperative) information abstracted from notes after enrollment was complete. Complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo system and further classified into minor and major. In 2016, surgeons who performed the nephrectomies were invited to fill an online survey on their training and experience.
METHODS: Multivariable logistic regression models with generalized estimating equations were used to compare perioperative complication rates between different groups of donors. The effect of surgeon characteristics on the complication rate was explored using a similar approach. Poisson regression was used to test rates of overall perioperative complications between high- and low-volume centers.
RESULTS: Of the 1421 living kidney donor candidates, 1042 individuals proceeded with donation, where 134 (13% [95% confidence interval (CI): 11%-15%]) experienced 142 perioperative complications (55 intraoperative; 87 postoperative). The most common intraoperative complication was organ injury and the most common postoperative complication was ileus. No donors died in the perioperative period. Most complications were minor (90% of 142 complications [95% CI: 86%-96%]); however, 12 donors (1% of 1042 [95% CI: 1%-2%]) experienced a major complication. No statistically significant differences were observed between donor groups and the rate of complications. A total of 43 of 48 eligible surgeons (90%) completed the online survey. Perioperative complication rates did not vary significantly by surgeon characteristics or by high- versus low-volume centers.
CONCLUSIONS: Operative and discharge reporting is not standardized and varies among surgeons. It is possible that some complications were missed. The online survey for surgeons was completed retrospectively, was based on self-report, and has not been validated. We had adequate statistical power only to detect large effects for factors associated with a higher risk of perioperative complications.
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the safety of living kidney donation as evidenced by the low rate of major perioperative complications. We did not identify any donor or surgeon characteristics associated with a higher risk of perioperative complications.
BACKGROUND: NCT00319579: A Prospective Study of Living Kidney Donation (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00319579)NCT00936078: Living Kidney Donor Study (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00936078).
BACKGROUND: Bien que le don vivant d’un rein soit sécuritaire chez un individu en santé, plusieurs facteurs sont susceptibles d’engendrer des complications périopératoires.
OBJECTIVE: Nous avons exploré l’association entre l’incidence des complications périopératoires et les caractéristiques du donneur, la technique chirurgicale employée et l’expérience du chirurgien au sein d’une vaste cohorte contemporaine de donneurs vivants d’un rein.
UNASSIGNED: Une étude de cohorte multicentrique où certaines données (notamment les renseignements concernant le chirurgien) ont été recueillies rétrospectivement, après l’inclusion complète des sujets (donneurs vivants d’un rein).
UNASSIGNED: Des centres de transplantation au Canada (n=12) et en Australie (n=5).
UNASSIGNED: Des individus ayant fait don d’un rein entre 2004 et 2014, et les chirurgiens qui ont procédé à la néphrectomie.
UNASSIGNED: Les notes médicales au dossier, opératoires et à la sortie de l’hôpital, ont été recueillies de façon prospective; les données concernant les renseignements périopératoires (peropératoires et postopératoires) ayant été extraites des notes une fois l’inclusion du sujet complétée. Les complications ont été catégorisées selon la classification de Clavien-Dindo, puis caractérisées comme étant mineures ou majeures. En 2016, les chirurgiens ayant pratiqué les néphrectomies ont été invités à répondre à un sondage en ligne au sujet de leur formation et de leur expérience.
UNASSIGNED: Des modèles de régression logistique multivariée utilisant des équations d’estimation généralisées ont été employés pour comparer les taux de complications périopératoires entre les différents groupes de donneurs. L’effet exercé sur le taux de complications par les caractéristiques du chirurgien a été exploré selon une approche similaire. Une régression de Poisson a été utilisée pour évaluer et comparer les taux globaux de complications entre les centres à volume élevé et les centres à faible volume.
UNASSIGNED: Des 1 421 candidats répertoriés, 1 042 individus ont subi une néphrectomie, desquels 134 (13 % [IC 95 %: 11–15 %]) ont vécu un total de 142 complications périopératoires (55 peropératoires; 87 postopératoires). La complication peropératoire la plus fréquente était une lésion à l’organe, alors qu’un iléus s’est avéré la principale complication postopératoire. Aucun donneur n’est décédé en période périopératoire. La plupart des complications rencontrées étaient mineures (90 % des 142 complications répertoriées [IC 95 %: 86–96 %]). Toutefois, 12 donneurs (1 % des 1 042 donneurs [IC 95 %: 1–2 %]) ont souffert de complications majeures. Aucune différence significative du point de vue statistique n’a été observée entre les groupes de donneurs et le taux de complications. Des 48 chirurgiens admissibles, 43 (90 %) ont répondu au sondage en ligne. Les taux de complications périoperatoires n’ont pas varié de façon significative en fonction des caractéristiques des chirurgiens, ou selon le volume de patients de l’hôpital.
UNASSIGNED: La façon d’inscrire les renseignements médicaux (opératoires ou à la sortie de l’hôpital) dans les dossiers des patients n’est pas normalisée et varie d’un chirurgien à l’autre. Certaines complications pourraient ne pas avoir été notées. Le sondage en ligne destiné aux chirurgiens a été rempli rétrospectivement, il reposait sur des déclarations volontaires et n’avait pas fait l’objet d’une validation. Nous ne disposions d’une puissance statistique que pour détecter les effets importants des facteurs associés à un risque accru de complications périopératoires.
CONCLUSIONS: Cette étude confirme le caractère sécuritaire d’un don vivant de rein, comme en témoigne le très faible taux de complications périopératoires majeures. Nous n’avons pu établir de caractéristiques, du donneur ou du chirurgien, qui soit associées à un risque accru de complications périopératoires.

To investigate the utility of estimated glomerular filtration rate for assessing kidney function in living kidney donors before and after nephrectomy.
A total of 101 donors underwent inulin clearance measurements before and 1 year after nephrectomy. The mean of three inulin clearance values was used as the measured glomerular filtration rate. Estimated glomerular filtration rate based on serum creatinine and cystatin C levels was calculated using the Japanese estimated glomerular filtration rate equation, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula and new full age spectrum equation. Age-adjusted chronic kidney disease was defined as glomerular filtration rate <75 mL/min/1.73m2 for donors aged <40 years, <60 mL/min/1.73m2 for donors aged 40-65 years and <45 mL/min/1.73m2 for donors aged >65 years.
The postoperative measured glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73m2 and age-adjusted chronic kidney disease rate were 36.0% and 27.0%, respectively. In younger donors (aged <50 years), postoperative measured glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73m2 and age-adjusted chronic kidney disease rates were 5.3% and 26.3%, respectively. In older donors (aged >70 years), postoperative measured glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73m2 and age-adjusted chronic kidney disease rates were 75.0% and 33.3%, respectively. Donor age and measured glomerular filtration rate were significant predictors of postoperative measured glomerular filtration rate. The Japanese estimated glomerular filtration rate equation based on creatinine and cystatin C showed the strongest correlation with measured glomerular filtration rate. However, the Japanese estimated glomerular filtration rate equation based on creatinine overestimated the prevalence of measured glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73m2 , whereas the Japanese estimated glomerular filtration rate based on cystatin C underestimated it.
Aged donors might have an increased risk of lower glomerular filtration rate after donor nephrectomy; post-surgery, long-term monitoring of renal function is recommended. Measurement of glomerular filtration rate should be carried out for donors, especially pre-surgery. A more precise glomerular filtration rate equation is required in the future.

BACKGROUND: In 2013, the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network began requiring transplant centers in the United States to collect and report postdonation living kidney donor follow-up data at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Despite this requirement, <50% of transplant centers have been able to collect and report the required data. Previous work identified a number of barriers to living kidney donor follow-up, including logistical and administrative barriers for transplant centers and cost and functional barriers for donors. Novel smartphone-based mobile health (mHealth) technologies might reduce the burden of living kidney donor follow-up for centers and donors. However, the attitudes and perceptions toward the incorporation of mHealth into postdonation care among living kidney donors are unknown. Understanding donor attitudes and perceptions will be vital to the creation of a patient-oriented mHealth system to improve living donor follow-up in the United States.
OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to assess living kidney donor attitudes and perceptions associated with the use of mHealth for follow-up.
METHODS: We developed and administered a cross-sectional 14-question survey to 100 living kidney donors at our transplant center. All participants were part of an ongoing longitudinal study of long-term outcomes in living kidney donors. The survey included questions on smartphone use, current health maintenance behaviors, accessibility to health information, and attitudes toward using mHealth for living kidney donor follow-up.
RESULTS: Of the 100 participants surveyed, 94 owned a smartphone (35 Android, 58 iPhone, 1 Blackberry), 37 had accessed their electronic medical record on their smartphone, and 38 had tracked their exercise and physical activity on their smartphone. While 77% (72/93) of participants who owned a smartphone and had asked a medical question in the last year placed the most trust with their doctors, nurses, or other health care professionals regarding answering a health-related question, 52% (48/93) most often accessed health information elsewhere. Overall, 79% (74/94) of smartphone-owning participants perceived accessing living kidney donor information and resources on their smartphone as useful. Additionally, 80% (75/94) perceived completing some living kidney donor follow-up via mHealth as useful. There were no significant differences in median age (60 vs 59 years; P=.65), median years since donation (10 vs 12 years; P=.45), gender (36/75, 36%, vs 37/75, 37%, male; P=.57), or race (70/75, 93%, vs 18/19, 95%, white; P=.34) between those who perceived mHealth as useful for living kidney donor follow-up and those who did not, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, smartphone ownership was high (94/100, 94.0%), and 79% (74/94) of surveyed smartphone-owning donors felt that it would be useful to complete their required follow-up with an mHealth tool, with no significant differences by age, sex, or race. These results suggest that patients would benefit from an mHealth tool to perform living donor follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Urinary angiotensinogen (uAGT) has recently been proposed as a marker of kidney injury and activated intrarenal renin-angiotensin system. We investigated the effects of living donor nephrectomy on uAGT levels, blood pressure, estimated glomerular filtration rate, proteinuria and compensatory hypertrophy in the remaining kidney of living kidney donors.
METHODS: Twenty living kidney donors were included in the study and followed for 1 year. uAGT levels were measured with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay preoperatively and postoperatively at the 15th day, 1, 6 and 12 months.
RESULTS: Four donors were excluded from the study due to lack of data. The mean baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate was 98 ± 15 ml/min/1.73 m². Serum creatinine, uAGT/creatinine, uAGT/protein levels were higher and estimated glomerular filtration rate was lower than baseline values at all time periods. Urinary protein/creatinine levels increased after donor nephrectomy, but after 6 months they returned to baseline values. Renal volume increased after nephrectomy, but these changes did not show any correlation with uAGT/creatinine, uAGT/protein, estimated glomerular filtration rate or systolic/diastolic blood pressures. uAGT/creatinine at 6 months and urinary protein/creatinine ratio at 12 months showed a positive correlation ( P=0.008, r=0.639).
CONCLUSIONS: After donor nephrectomy, increasing uAGT levels can be the result of activation of the intrarenal renin-angiotensin system affecting the compensatory changes in the remaining kidney. The long-term effects of increased uAGT levels on the remaining kidney should be examined more closely in future studies.

Long-term follow-up of kidney donors is needed not only for the individual donor\'s benefit but also to establish analyzable databases to improve the selection criteria for future donors. We collected data including the date of transplantation, the date of the last follow-up, donor\'s age, sex, their relationship to the recipient, renal function, proteinuria, and the prevalence of hypertension. Of 124 donors, 52 donors were not being followed up. The mean duration of follow-up was 4.3 ± 3.6 years. Follow-up rates were 83.9%, 74.6%, and 59.2% at 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years postdonation, respectively. Of those not being followed up, 75% dropped out. Follow-up rates did not differ between parent and spouse donors 5 years (57.1% vs. 71.4%; P = 0.4) postdonation. Similarly, follow-up rates at 5 years did not differ between donors aged 60 years or older and those younger than 60 (57.5% vs. 61.3%; P = 0.6). Of 72 donors being followed up, 75.0% had estimated glomerular filtration rate of <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, 8.3% had proteinuria, and 41.7% had hypertension requiring medication. There is a limitation to the endeavor of each transplant center to follow-up all their donors. Long-term donor follow-up in Japan requires a national registration system and mandates transplant center participation.

BACKGROUND: There is enough evidence concerning the short-term safety of living donors after kidney transplantation. However, long-term complications continue to be studied, with a particular interest in young donors. Previous studies have been conducted in older donors for adult renal patients. We present a study of long-term complications in kidney donors for our paediatric population.
METHODS: We carried out a long-term donor study for the 54 living kidney-donor transplantations performed at our department from 1979 to June 2014. We monitored the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) on the basis of 24-hour urine creatinine clearance, 24-hour proteinuria and the development of arterial hypertension in the 48 donors who were followed up for more than one year. Only the 39 patients who were exclusively followed up by our department have been included in the results analysis.
RESULTS: GFR through creatinine clearance was stable after an initial decrease. No proteinuria was observed in any of the cases. One patient developed chronic kidney disease (CKD), which resulted in a cumulative incidence of 2%. GFR below 60mL/min/1.73 m2 was not reported in any other patients. Arterial hypertension was diagnosed in 25% of donors, 90% of which were treated with antihypertensives.
CONCLUSIONS: Risk of CKD and hypertension in living kidney donors for paediatric recipients, who are carefully monitored throughout their evolution, is similar to that of the general population. Therefore, this technique appears to be safe in both the short and long term.