Headspace solid-phase microextraction coupled to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS) offers an alternative analysis method for isoeugenol (an active ingredient in fish sedatives) that avoids the use of organic solvents, simplifies sample preparation, and can be fully automated. This work focuses on developing and evaluating an HS-SPME-GC-MS method for isoeugenol in aquaculture samples and testing the stability of isoeugenol itself. Because of isoeugenol\'s relatively low volatility, more polar SPME fiber coatings (polyacrylate and polydimethylsiloxane/divinylbenzene) had better performance and the headspace extractions took over 30 min to reach equilibrium. Additionally, it was found that isoeugenol was relatively unstable compared to a deuterated standard (d3-eugenol) in the presence of water. To address this, after the fish samples were homogenized with water, they were heated at 50 °C for 1 h prior to analysis for equilibration. By using the method developed in this work, isoeugenol\'s detection limits in multiple aquaculture matrices (shrimp, tilapia, and salmon) were in the low ng/g range (<15 ng/g), well below the target testing level (200 ng/g). Additionally, by adding d3-eugenol as an internal standard, excellent linearity (R2 > 0.98), accuracy (97-99% recoveries), and precision (5-13% RSDs) were all achieved.

Chemical grouping and read-across are frequently used non-animal alternatives for filling toxicological data gaps. When grouping chemicals, it is critical to define the applicability domain because minor differences in chemical structure can lead to significant differences in toxicity. Here, we present a case study on isoeugenol and methyl eugenol, which are scheduled for review by IARC in June 2023, to illustrate that structural similarity alone may not be sufficient to group chemicals for hazard classification. Isoeugenol and methyl eugenol are plant-derived phenylpropenes that share similar physicochemical properties. The major metabolic pathway for isoeugenol includes conjugation of the phenolic hydroxyl group with sulfate and glucuronic acid as an efficient detoxification process, whereas the major metabolic pathway for methyl eugenol involves benzylic hydroxylation and formation of the 1\'-sulfoxymethyleugenol which leads to carbocation formation. The carbocation can form DNA adducts and induce genotoxicity and carcinogenicity. Consistently, genotoxicity and carcinogenicity alerts are identified from in silico prediction tools for methyl eugenol but not isoeugenol. Moreover, the available toxicogenomic, genotoxicity, and carcinogenicity studies confirm that these chemicals have significantly different bioactivities. Data on other structurally similar chemicals further supports our conclusion that it is not appropriate to group these two chemicals for cancer hazard classification.

Eugenol and its isomer isoeugenol are both used as flavouring agents or food additives in food products, and have both some similar biological properties. However, the difference in biological activities between eugenol and isoeugenol is rarely studied. In this study, the profiles of antioxidant, DNA-protective effects and antibacterial activities of eugenol and isoeugenol against several common foodborne pathogens were investigated and compared under various experiment conditions. Results showed that eugenol and isoeugenol had strong antioxidant activity, the protective effect against DNA damage and antibacterial activity. In addition, it was found that isoeugenol exhibited the higher biological activities mentioned above than eugenol, which was because isoeugenol had a carbon-carbon double bond closer to the benzene ring compared with eugenol. However, the specific reason needs to be further studied.