integrated

集成
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    融合已成为促进难民和收容人口公平获得保健服务的一项关键战略。这项研究探讨了利益攸关方在西尼罗河地区有目的地选择的两个难民收容区Adjumani和Obongi为难民和收容人口整合保健服务的看法和经验,乌干达。本研究采用案例研究设计。对28名有意选择的受访者进行了关键线人访谈。数据进行了主题分析。Quirkos软件用于管理和分析数据。受访者表示,一体化正在加强卫生服务,提供一个机会来加强它们,并改善难民和收容人口的覆盖面和准入。影响一体化的因素包括政策和执行方面的差距,服务交付的无效系统和结构,协调和管理不足,资金不足。在服务层面的挑战,包括基础设施不足,卫生工作者的短缺以及药品和基本用品的缺货影响了卫生服务的整合。总的来说,结构性和系统性问题继续影响卫生服务的整合。重要的是加强政策执行和建设各区支持卫生服务一体化的能力。
    Integration has emerged as a key strategy for promoting equitable access to health services for refugees and host populations. This study explored the perceptions and experiences of stakeholders on the integration of health services for refugees and host populations in two purposefully selected refugee-hosting districts of Adjumani and Obongi in the West Nile region, Uganda. This study used a case study design. Key informant interviews were conducted with 28 purposefully selected respondents. Data were analysed thematically. Quirkos software was used to manage and analyse data. Respondents indicated that integration is enhancing health services, providing an opportunity to strengthen them and improve coverage and access for refugees and host populations. Factors affecting integration include gaps in policy and implementation, ineffective systems and structures for service delivery, inadequate coordination and management and inadequate funding. At the service level challenges including inadequate infrastructure, shortage of health workers and stock out of medicines and essential supplies affect the integration of health services. Overall, structural and systemic issues continue to affect the integration of health services. It is important to strengthen policy implementation and build the capacity of districts to support the integration of health services.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    解除与COVID-19相关的严格限制后,全球卫生系统不堪重负。关于卫生系统如何更好地为未来的流行病做好准备,已经讨论了很多;然而,初级卫生保健(PHC)在很大程度上被忽视。
    我们旨在调查PHC可以通过自下而上的方法应用哪些综合政策来加强医疗保健系统,以便更好地应对突发公共卫生事件。
    我们开发了一个系统动力学模型,以在解除与COVID-19相关的限制时复制上海的反应。然后,我们模拟了另一种基于PHC的综合卫生系统,并测试了以下三种干预措施:PHC首次接触远程医疗服务,二级保健的建议,并返回PHC进行恢复。
    模拟结果表明,每种选择的干预措施都可以减轻医院的压力。提高PHC与远程医疗的首次接触率将医院病床的可用性提高了6%至12%,并将累计死亡人数减少了35%。更精确的建议对医院压倒性的影响有限(<1%),但模拟结果显示,推荐不足(比例:80%)将导致累计死亡增加19%.将PHC的回报率从5%提高到20%,将医院病床的可用性提高了6%至16%,并将累计死亡人数减少了46%。此外,结合所有3种干预措施具有乘数效应;床位可用性增加了683%,累计死亡人数下降了75%。
    不是专注于二级保健的医疗资源的分配,我们确定基于PHC的最佳综合策略是在PHC中首次接触率达到60%,110%的推荐率,和20%的PHC回报率。这可以在突发公共卫生事件期间提高卫生系统的抵御能力。
    UNASSIGNED: After strict COVID-19-related restrictions were lifted, health systems globally were overwhelmed. Much has been discussed about how health systems could better prepare for future pandemics; however, primary health care (PHC) has been largely ignored.
    UNASSIGNED: We aimed to investigate what combined policies PHC could apply to strengthen the health care system via a bottom-up approach, so as to better respond to a public health emergency.
    UNASSIGNED: We developed a system dynamics model to replicate Shanghai\'s response when COVID-19-related restrictions were lifted. We then simulated an alternative PHC-based integrated health system and tested the following three interventions: first contact in PHC with telemedicine services, recommendation to secondary care, and return to PHC for recovery.
    UNASSIGNED: The simulation results showed that each selected intervention could alleviate hospital overwhelm. Increasing the rate of first contact in PHC with telemedicine increased hospital bed availability by 6% to 12% and reduced the cumulative number of deaths by 35%. More precise recommendations had a limited impact on hospital overwhelm (<1%), but the simulation results showed that underrecommendation (rate: 80%) would result in a 19% increase in cumulative deaths. Increasing the rate of return to PHC from 5% to 20% improved hospital bed availability by 6% to 16% and reduced the cumulative number of deaths by 46%. Moreover, combining all 3 interventions had a multiplier effect; bed availability increased by 683%, and the cumulative number of deaths dropped by 75%.
    UNASSIGNED: Rather than focusing on the allocation of medical resources in secondary care, we determined that an optimal PHC-based integrated strategy would be to have a 60% rate of first contact in PHC, a 110% recommendation rate, and a 20% rate of return to PHC. This could increase health system resilience during public health emergencies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:咨询联络(C-L)精神病学服务旨在帮助综合医院工作人员为患者提供更好的护理。最近,许多住院C-L精神病学服务已采取主动和综合的方法来实现这一目标。尽管有这些发展,目前还没有对患者和工作人员使用新方法的经验进行基于访谈的研究。
    目的:深入了解患者和医疗单位工作人员为老年住院患者提供主动和综合的C-L精神病学服务的经验(前瞻性综合C-L精神病学[PICLP])。
    方法:我们进行了基于访谈的定性研究,并进行了主题分析。参与者是在HOME研究期间经历过PICLP的患者和工作人员,一项在英国三家综合医院的24个医疗单位中评估PICLP的随机试验。
    结果:我们进行了97次访谈:43例患者或其代理人(代表显著认知障碍患者接受访谈的家庭成员)和54例所有相关学科的工作人员。患者和工作人员都描述了PICLP如何对医疗保健和出院计划有帮助。它增强了医疗单位团队解决心理问题的能力,精神病学,和社会需求,并提供以患者为中心的护理。他们欢迎积极的生物心理社会评估以及这些对患者复杂问题提供的更广泛的观点。他们还重视将C-L精神科医生纳入单位团队以及与他们的日常联系。对于患者来说,它促进了治疗关系,并帮助他们更多地参与医疗和出院计划的决定。对于工作人员,它使人们能够随时获得精神病学专业知识和培训机会。报道的少数PICLP无益的经验主要是由于参与患者护理的临床医生人数较多,以及对综合团队中的专业角色缺乏明确性。
    结论:我们发现,老年住院患者和医疗单位工作人员将PICLP视为可接受且通常有帮助。我们的发现增加了现有的证据,证明了主动和综合的C-L精神病学服务的好处。
    BACKGROUND: Consultation-liaison (C-L) psychiatry services aim to help general hospital staff provide better care for their patients. Recently, many inpatient C-L psychiatry services have adopted proactive and integrated approaches to achieve this aim. Despite these developments, there have been no interview-based studies of patients\' and staff members\' experiences of the new approaches.
    OBJECTIVE: To gain an in-depth understanding of patients\' and medical unit staff members\' experiences of a proactive and integrated C-L psychiatry service for older medical inpatients (Proactive Integrated C-L Psychiatry [PICLP]).
    METHODS: We conducted an interview-based qualitative study with thematic analysis. The participants were patients and staff who had experienced PICLP during The HOME Study, a randomized trial that evaluated PICLP in 24 medical units of three UK general hospitals.
    RESULTS: We conducted 97 interviews: 43 with patients or their proxies (family members who were interviewed on behalf of patients with significant cognitive impairment) and 54 with staff members of all relevant disciplines. Patients and staff both described how PICLP was a helpful addition to medical care and discharge planning. It enhanced the medical unit team\'s ability to address psychological, psychiatric, and social needs and provide patient-centered care. They welcomed proactive biopsychosocial assessments and the broader perspective that these offered on patients\' complex problems. They also valued the integration of C-L psychiatrists into the unit teams and their daily contact with them. For patients, it fostered a therapeutic relationship and helped them to be more engaged in decisions about their medical care and discharge planning. For staff, it enabled ready access to psychiatric expertise and training opportunities. The few reported experiences of PICLP being unhelpful were mainly about the greater number of clinicians involved in patients\' care and a lack of clarity about professional roles in the integrated team.
    CONCLUSIONS: We found that older inpatients and medical unit staff experienced PICLP as both acceptable and generally helpful. Our findings add to the existing evidence for the benefits of proactive and integrated C-L psychiatry services.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在确定专门治疗老年患者的学术医院医学精神病学部门(MPU)的愿景和使命。所有在学术医院的老年MPU工作的医疗保健提供者都被邀请反思制定该病房的愿景和使命。其中22人参加了焦点小组访谈。访谈的重点是定义MPU的功能,其目标,它将如何实现这些目标,MPU渴望去的地方。访谈按QUAGOL指南逐字记录和分析。分析的主题来自这些小组讨论。参与者将MPU的愿景定义为在综合精神和身体老年住院医疗保健方面表现出色,鼓励其他人摆脱与这个脆弱的患者群体有关的耻辱。焦点小组讨论产生的使命是提供以患者为中心,为患有精神和身体疾病的老年人提供综合医疗服务。为了实现这一点,涉及患者的网络,跨学科性,共同决策,所有利益相关者之间的明确沟通,患者重返社区成为重要主题。这项研究提供了学术精神病医院中老年MPU的愿景和使命。尽管国际上呼吁对患有精神和身体综合障碍的老年人进行综合护理,但文献中对MPU的特征没有达成共识,这些愿景和使命声明可以提供关于如何为这个脆弱的患者群体安装优秀医疗保健的讨论。
    This study aims to determine the vision and mission of an academic hospital\'s medical psychiatry unit (MPU) that exclusively treats geriatric patients. All healthcare providers working at an academic hospital\'s geriatric MPU were invited to reflect on formulate the vision and mission of this ward. Twenty-two of them took part in the focus group interviews. The interviews focused on defining the MPU\'s functioning, its objectives, how it will reach these objectives, and where the MPU aspires to go. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed according to the QUAGOL guide. The themes from the analysis emerged from these group discussions. The participants defined the MPU\'s vision as to excel in integrated mental and physical geriatric inpatient healthcare, inspiring others to shed the stigma related to this vulnerable patient population. The mission that emerged from the focus group discussions is to provide patient-centered, integrated healthcare for older adults with combined mental and physical disorders. To achieve this, involving the patient\'s network, interdisciplinarity, shared decision-making, clear communication between all stakeholders, and reintegration of patients into their communities emerged as important themes. This study provides a vision and mission of a geriatric MPU in an academic psychiatric hospital. Since there is no consensus in the literature about the characteristics of MPUs despite the international call for integrated care for older persons with combined mental and physical disorders, these vision and mission statements can feed the discussion on how to install excellent healthcare for this vulnerable patient population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    目的:描述提供主动和综合咨询-联络(C-L)精神病学服务模式(PICLP)的实践经验。PICLP是专为老年医疗住院患者,明确是生物心理社会和出院为重点。在本文中,我们报告:(a)对15名临床医生(7名高级C-L精神科医生和8名协助临床医生)进行PICLP培训的观察;(b)他们为1359名患者提供的护理;(c)他们以这种新方式工作的经验。
    方法:使用定量和定性数据的混合方法观察研究,作为HOME研究(一项比较PICLP与常规治疗的随机试验)的一部分,在两年内前瞻性收集。
    结果:根据服务手册,临床医生成功地接受了PICLP的培训。他们积极评估了所有患者,发现大多数患者有多种生物心理社会问题,阻碍了他们及时出院。他们与病房团队整合,提供一系列旨在解决这些问题的干预措施。交付PICLP需要适度的临床时间,和临床医生体验它作为临床价值和专业奖励。
    结论:提供PICLP的经验突出了C-L精神病学临床医生的特殊作用,以积极主动和综合的方式工作,可以在医疗保健中玩耍。
    To describe the practical experience of delivering a proactive and integrated consultation-liaison (C-L) psychiatry service model (PICLP). PICLP is designed for older medical inpatients and is explicitly biopsychosocial and discharge-focused. In this paper we report: (a) observations on the training of 15 clinicians (seven senior C-L psychiatrists and eight assisting clinicians) to deliver PICLP; (b) the care they provided to 1359 patients; (c) their experiences of working in this new way.
    A mixed methods observational study using quantitative and qualitative data, collected prospectively over two years as part of The HOME Study (a randomized trial comparing PICLP with usual care).
    The clinicians were successfully trained to deliver PICLP according to the service manual. They proactively assessed all patients and found that most had multiple biopsychosocial problems impeding their timely discharge from hospital. They integrated with ward teams to provide a range of interventions aimed at addressing these problems. Delivering PICLP took a modest amount of clinical time, and the clinicians experienced it as both clinically valuable and professionally rewarding.
    The experience of delivering PICLP highlights the special role that C-L psychiatry clinicians, working in a proactive and integrated way, can play in medical care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    缺乏协调的护理会导致患有多种疾病的老年人产生多种不良反应,包括高治疗负担,不良健康结果,重复的医疗保健服务利用,和灾难性的医疗支出。为了促进健康的衰老,世界卫生组织提出了以人为中心的综合护理,以老年人为目标。这项研究的目的是确定影响在中国成功实施老年多病患者综合护理的因素。
    从2022年7月到2023年5月,从浙江省招募了33名参与为多病患者老年人提供和管理医疗保健服务的医疗保健提供者和管理人员,中国采用有目的和最大变异抽样方法。半结构化,由相同的面试官以中文母语进行面对面的深入访谈,直到数据达到饱和。采用归纳主题分析法对数据进行分析,然后,使用综合护理的彩虹模型将主题映射到六个维度,以全面了解研究结果。
    11个主题作为促进者和障碍,在中国为患有多种疾病的老年人提供综合护理。这些主题包括(1)临床整合:以患者为中心的护理,(2)专业整合:跨学科团队和培训,(3)组织整合:资源和可访问性,(4)系统集成:社区和基金,激励机制,和健康保险,(5)功能集成:电子健康档案系统,劳动力,和指导方针,(6)规范整合:共同使命。
    在综合护理彩虹模式的指导下,各种因素在微观上,meso,在这项研究中,已经确定了影响在中国背景下对患有多发病率的老年人实施综合护理的宏观层面。未来干预措施和政策的战略应侧重于促进促进者和解决障碍。
    UNASSIGNED: A lack of coordinated care leads to multiple adverse effects for older adults with multimorbidity, including high treatment burdens, adverse health outcomes, reduplicated healthcare service utilization, and catastrophic healthcare expenditure. To foster healthy aging, person-centered integrated care that is responsive to older adults has been proposed by the World Health Organization. The objective of this study was to identify factors that impact the successful implementation of integrated care for older adults with multimorbidity in China.
    UNASSIGNED: From July 2022 to May 2023, 33 healthcare providers and managers involved in the delivery and management of healthcare services for older adults with multimorbidity were recruited from Zhejiang Province, China using purposeful and maximum variation sampling methods. Semi-structured, face-to-face in-depth interviews were conducted by the same interviewer in the participants\' native Chinese language until data saturation was reached. Inductive thematic analysis was used to analyze the data, and then, themes were mapped onto six dimensions using the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care to allow for a comprehensive view of the study\'s findings.
    UNASSIGNED: Eleven themes were generated as facilitators and barriers to integrated care for older adults with multimorbidity in China. These themes include (1) clinical integration: patient-centered care, (2) professional integration: interdisciplinary teams and training, (3) organizational integration: resources and accessibility, (4) system integration: community and funds, incentives, and health insurance, (5) functional integration: electronic health record systems, workforce, and guidelines, and (6) normative integration: shared mission.
    UNASSIGNED: Guided by the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care, various factors at both micro, meso, and macro levels that impact the implementation of integrated care for older adults with multimorbidity in the Chinese context have been identified in this study. The strategies for future interventions and policies should focus on promoting facilitators and addressing barriers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在治疗伙伴关系中,医生依靠病人来描述他们的健康状况,加入共同决策,并参与支持的自我管理活动。在共享护理中,病人,初级保健,和专家服务合作伙伴一起使用商定的流程和输出,将患者置于其护理中心。然而,很少有实证研究探讨医生对患者的信任及其对共享护理模式的影响。
    目的:探索全科医生(GP)对患者的信任,以及信任对全科医生参与新护理模式的意愿的影响,如结直肠癌共同护理。
    方法:通过专业网络招募GP参与者进行半结构化访谈。成绩单经过完整性检查,感应编码,和主题迭代发展。
    结果:分析了25次访谈。一些全科医生认为信任是医生的责任,并且很容易信任患者。对于其他GP,对患者的信任是基于患者的特点,如诚实,可靠性,和自我保健的主动性。全科医生更愿意与他们开发的患者进行结直肠癌共享护理,信任关系。
    结论:信任在患者获得共享护理方面发挥着重要作用。共享护理的实施应考虑患者与医疗保健提供者之间的关系动态。
    在治疗伙伴关系中,医生依靠病人来描述他们的健康状况,参与共同决策,并参与支持的自我管理活动。在共享护理中,病人,初级保健,和专家服务合作伙伴一起使用商定的流程和输出,将患者置于其护理中心。信任是这种伙伴关系的关键。然而,很少有研究探讨医生对患者的信任及其对共享护理模式的影响。这项研究旨在探索全科医生(GP)对患者的信任,以及信任对全科医生参与新护理模式的意愿的影响,如结直肠癌共同护理。在分析了25份全科医生的采访记录后,我们发现一些全科医生认为信任是医生的责任,而在别人,对患者的信任是基于患者的特征,如诚实,可靠性,和自我保健的主动性。全科医生更愿意与他们开发的患者进行结直肠癌共享护理,信任关系。信任在患者获得共享护理方面起着重要作用。共享护理的推出应考虑患者与医疗保健提供者之间的关系动态。
    BACKGROUND: In a therapeutic partnership, physicians rely on patients to describe their health conditions, join in shared decision-making, and engage with supported self-management activities. In shared care, the patient, primary care, and specialist services partner together using agreed processes and outputs for the patient to be placed at the centre of their care. However, few empirical studies have explored physicians\' trust in patients and its implications for shared care models.
    OBJECTIVE: To explore trust in patients amongst general practitioners (GPs), and the impacts of trust on GPs\' willingness to engage in new models of care, such as colorectal cancer shared care.
    METHODS: GP participants were recruited through professional networks for semi-structured interviews. Transcripts were integrity checked, coded inductively, and themes developed iteratively.
    RESULTS: Twenty-five interviews were analysed. Some GPs view trust as a responsibility of the physician and have a high propensity for trusting patients. For other GPs, trust in patients is developed over successive consultations based on patient characteristics such as honesty, reliability, and proactivity in self-care. GPs were more willing to engage in colorectal cancer shared care with patients with whom they have a developed, trusting relationship.
    CONCLUSIONS: Trust plays a significant role in the patient\'s access to shared care. The implementation of shared care should consider the relational dynamics between the patient and health care providers.
    In a therapeutic partnership, physicians rely on patients to describe their health conditions, join in shared decision-making and engage with supported self-management activities. In shared care, the patient, primary care, and specialist services partner together using agreed processes and outputs for the patient to be placed at the centre of their care. Trust is key to this partnership. However, few studies have explored the physicians’ trust in patients and its implications for shared care models. This study aims to explore trust in patients amongst general practitioners (GPs), and the impacts of trust on GPs’ willingness to engage in new models of care, such as colorectal cancer shared care. After analysing 25 interview transcripts with GPs, we found some GPs view trust as a responsibility of the physicians, while in others, trust in patients developed over successive consultations based on patient characteristics such as honesty, reliability, and proactivity in self-care. GPs were more willing to engage in colorectal cancer shared care with patients whom they have a developed, trusting relationship. Trust plays a significant role in the patient’s access to shared care. The rollout of shared care should consider the relational dynamics between the patient and health care providers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Review
    集成的目标程序,针对慢性病患者的以人为中心的护理为初级保健(PC)专业人员提供了一套工具和培训,以积极参与人口细分和以人为中心的需求评估(PCNA)。进行了一项试点研究,以深入了解该计划的可行性和可接受性,并确定成功实施的先决条件。
    从2020年8月开始,七个荷兰PC实践参与了为期半年的试点研究。我们对人口细分工具进行了回顾,观察了四次培训课程和15次PCNA,并采访了15名专业人士和12名患者。
    关于可行性和可接受性,我们发现,这些工具和培训为专业人员提供了使用细分工具的技能,并在备受好评的PCNA中发挥更多的指导作用.关于实施先决条件,我们发现团队承诺和网络连接需要改进,尽管工作乐趣增加了,专业人士普遍希望该计划继续下去。
    虽然用户支持TARGET程序的内容,实施过程,例如,团队对该计划的承诺,在未来的升级工作中需要更多的关注。
    关键点在实践中实施综合护理,初级保健专业人员(PCP)需要具体的工具,技能和信心。PCP认为TARGET计划的工具和培训是可行和可接受的,以组织集成的CareTARGET的成功取决于专业人员对其实施的承诺以及与其他领域专业人员的联系强度。基于定性的见解,TARGET提高了工作乐趣和患者体验,但是有效地降低工作压力需要时间。
    UNASSIGNED: The TARGET program for integrated, person-centered care for people with chronic conditions offers primary care (PC) professionals a set of tools and trainings to actively engage in population segmentation and person-centered needs assessments (PCNAs). A pilot study was conducted to gain insight into the program\'s feasibility and acceptability, and identify preconditions for successful implementation.
    UNASSIGNED: Seven Dutch PC practices participated in a half-year pilot study starting in August 2020. We performed a review of the population segmentation tool, observed four training sessions and 15 PCNAs, and interviewed 15 professionals and 12 patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Regarding feasibility and acceptability, we found that the tools and trainings provided professionals with skills to use the segmentation tool and take a more coaching role in the well-appreciated PCNAs. Concerning implementation preconditions, we found that team commitment and network connections need improvement, although work pleasure increased and professionals generally wanted the program to continue.
    UNASSIGNED: While the content of the TARGET program is supported by its users, the implementation process, for instance team commitment to the program, needs more attention in future upscaling efforts.
    Key PointsTo implement integrated care in practice, primary care professionals (PCPs) need concrete tools, skills and confidence.PCPs consider the tools and trainings of the TARGET program as feasible and acceptable to organize integrated careTARGET’s success depends on commitment from professionals to its implementation and the strength of ties with professionals in other domains.Based on qualitative insights, TARGET improves work pleasure and patient experience, but it takes time to decrease work pressure effectively.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    世界范围内对康复服务(RS)的需求日益增加,特别是在中低收入国家(LMICs),在那里,高达50%的人目前无法获得他们需要的RS。本案例报告描述了智利如何将康复纳入初级卫生保健(PHC),以改善获得,覆盖范围,和公平。该报告借鉴了两名卫生部(MoH)官员的第一手经验,这些官员参与了从专门到以PHC为中心的康复的过渡。智利战略的基石是全面康复PHC计划(RehabPHC),于2007年推出。它有三个主要的服务提供策略:社区康复室(CRR),与家庭健康中心(CESFAM)相关的综合康复室(IRR),以及在偏远地区提供流动康复的农村康复小组(RRTs)。RehabPHC彻底改变了交付,组织,和康复融资。康复覆盖率从2007年的12个CRR增加到2022年的307个,在52.6%的CESFAM中可用。这一进展的关键是卫生部强有力的领导和财政承诺,以确保可持续的,以PHC为中心的国家康复系统。规划至关重要的是收集和持续监测关于康复需求和康复保健服务指标的数据,这促进了基于证据的资源分配。专门的政策也很关键,确定康复融资的发展途径和协调机制,倡导,数据收集,和监测。智利的经验强调了强有力治理的重要性,财务承诺,以及将康复纳入PHC的循证规划。因此,它为面临类似挑战的国家提供了宝贵的蓝图。
    The demand for rehabilitation services (RS) is increasing worldwide, particularly in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs), where up to 50% of people currently don\'t have access to the RS they need. This case report describes how Chile integrated rehabilitation into primary health care (PHC) to improve access, coverage, and equity. The report draws on the first-hand experiences of two Ministry of Health (MoH) officials involved in transitioning from specialized to PHC-centered rehabilitation. The cornerstone of Chile\'s strategy is the Comprehensive Rehabilitation in PHC Program (RehabPHC), launched in 2007. It has three main service delivery strategies: Community Rehabilitation Rooms (CRRs), Integrative Rehabilitation Rooms (IRRs) linked to Family Health Centers (CESFAM), and Rural Rehabilitation Teams (RRTs) that provide mobile rehabilitation in remote areas. RehabPHC revolutionized the delivery, organization, and financing of rehabilitation. Rehabilitation coverage increased from 12 CRRs in 2007 to 307 in 2022, available in 52.6% of CESFAMs. Key to this progress was strong leadership and financial commitment from the MoH to ensure a sustainable, PHC-centered national rehabilitation system. Essential to planning was collecting and continuously monitoring data on rehabilitation needs and RehabPHC service indicators, which promoted evidence-based resource allocation. A dedicated policy was also critical, defining development pathways and coordination mechanisms for rehabilitation financing, advocacy, data collection, and monitoring. Chile\'s experience underscores the importance of strong governance, financial commitment, and evidence-based planning in integrating rehabilitation into PHC. As such, it provides a valuable blueprint for countries facing similar challenges.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    医疗保健系统面临着越来越多的患有慢性病和复杂护理需求的患者,需要开发新的协调模式,以病人为中心的护理。在这项研究中,我们旨在描述和比较最近在瑞士初级保健中实施的一系列新的护理模式,以及深入了解实施的协调或集成类型,每种模式的优缺点以及它们面临的挑战。
    方法:我们使用嵌入式多案例研究设计来深入描述一系列瑞士当前的举措,这些举措专门旨在改善初级保健中的护理协调。对于每个模型,收集文件,进行了问卷调查,并对关键参与者进行了半结构化访谈。进行了案例内分析,然后进行了跨案例分析。基于彩虹模式的综合护理框架,强调了模型之间的异同。
    结果:分析中包括了8项综合护理计划,代表三种类型的模式:独立的多专业全科医生实践,多专业的全科医生实践/健康中心是较大的团体和区域综合交付系统的一部分。公认的有效活动和工具,以改善护理协调,比如多学科团队,案件经理的参与,使用电子病历,患者教育和使用护理计划,在所研究的八项举措中,至少有六项实施。实施综合护理模式的主要障碍是瑞士的报销政策和支付机制不足,以及一些医疗保健专业人员希望在新角色出现的情况下保护自己的领土。
    结论:在瑞士实施的综合护理模式很有希望;尽管如此,必须进行财务和法律改革,以在实践中促进综合护理。
    Healthcare systems are confronted with a rising number of patients with chronic conditions and complex care needs, requiring the development of new models of coordinated, patient-centred care. In this study, we aimed to describe and compare a range of new models of care recently implemented in primary care in Switzerland, as well as to gain insight into the type of coordination or integration implemented, the strengths and weaknesses of each model and the challenges they face.
    We used an embedded multiple case study design to describe in-depth a series of current Swiss initiatives that specifically aim to improve care coordination in primary care. For each model, documents were collected, a questionnaire was administered and semistructured interviews with key actors were conducted. A within-case analysis followed by a cross-case analysis were performed. Based on the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care framework, similarities and differences between the models were highlighted.
    Eight integrated care initiatives were included in the analysis, representing three types of models: independent multiprofessional GP practices, multiprofessional GP practices/health centres that are part of larger groups and regional integrated delivery systems. Recognized effective activities and tools to improve care coordination, such as multidisciplinary teams, case manager involvement, use of electronic medical records, patient education and use of care plans, were implemented by at least six of the eight initiatives studied. The main obstacles to the implementation of integrated care models were the inadequate Swiss reimbursement policies and payment mechanisms and the desire of some healthcare professionals to protect their territory in a context where new roles are emerging.
    The integrated care models implemented in Switzerland are promising; nevertheless, financial and legal reforms must be introduced to promote integrated care in practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号