influenza A

甲型流感
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:甲型流感导致显著的发病率和死亡率。VIR-2482,一种半衰期延长的工程化人类单克隆抗体,靶向甲型流感血凝素茎区高度保守的表位,并可能预防季节性和大流行性流感。
    方法:这种双盲,随机化,安慰剂对照,2期研究检查了VIR-2482在未接种疫苗的健康成人中预防季节性甲型流感的安全性和有效性.参与者(N=2977)被随机分为1:1:1,接受VIR-2482450mg,VIR-24821200毫克,或安慰剂通过肌内(IM)注射。主要和次要疗效终点是逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)确认的甲型流感感染和方案定义的流感样疾病(ILI)以及疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)定义的ILI或世界卫生组织(WHO)定义的ILI的参与者比例。分别。
    结果:VIR-2482450mg和1200mg预防并没有降低RT-PCR确认的甲型流感与安慰剂相比方案定义的ILI的风险(相对风险降低[RRR],3.8%[95%CI:-67.3,44.6]和15.9%[95%CI:-49.3,52.3],分别)。在1200毫克的剂量,使用CDC-ILI,甲型流感疾病的RRR为57.2%[95%CI:-2.5,82.2],使用WHO-ILI定义为44.1%[95%CI:-50.5,79.3],分别。无论流感状态如何,血清VIR-2482水平相似;未检测到具有降低的VIR-2482易感性的变体。局部注射部位反应温和,组间相似。
    结论:VIR-24821200mgIM耐受性良好,但未明显预防方案定义的ILI。次要终点分析表明,该剂量可能减少了甲型流感疾病。
    BACKGROUND: Influenza A results in significant morbidity and mortality. VIR-2482, an engineered human monoclonal antibody with extended half-life, targets a highly conserved epitope on the stem region of influenza A hemagglutinin, and may protect against seasonal and pandemic influenza.
    METHODS: This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study examined the safety and efficacy of VIR-2482 for seasonal influenza A illness prevention in unvaccinated healthy adults. Participants (N = 2977) were randomized 1:1:1 to receive VIR-2482 450 mg, VIR-2482 1200 mg, or placebo via intramuscular (IM) injection. Primary and secondary efficacy endpoints were the proportions of participants with reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-confirmed influenza A infection and either protocol-defined influenza-like illness (ILI) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-defined ILI or World Health Organization (WHO)-defined ILI, respectively.
    RESULTS: VIR-2482 450 mg and 1200 mg prophylaxis did not reduce the risk of protocol-defined ILI with RT-PCR-confirmed influenza A versus placebo (relative risk reduction [RRR], 3.8% [95% CI: -67.3, 44.6] and 15.9% [95% CI: -49.3, 52.3], respectively). At the 1200 mg dose, the RRRs in influenza A illness were 57.2% [95% CI: -2.5, 82.2] using CDC-ILI and 44.1% [95% CI: -50.5, 79.3] using WHO-ILI definitions, respectively. Serum VIR-2482 levels were similar regardless of influenza status; variants with reduced VIR-2482 susceptibility were not detected. Local injection-site reactions were mild and similar across groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: VIR-2482 1200 mg IM was well tolerated but did not significantly prevent protocol-defined ILI. Secondary endpoint analyses suggest this dose may have reduced influenza A illness.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在西西里(意大利),呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV),鼻病毒(HRV),流感病毒在儿童中引发了流行病,导致急性呼吸道感染(ARTI)增加。我们的目标是捕获儿童呼吸道感染的流行病学,确定封锁后哪些病原体与呼吸道感染相关,以及在SARS-CoV-2大流行后时期流行病学格局是否发生变化.
    方法:我们分析了204名出现呼吸道症状和/或发热的儿童的多重呼吸道病毒PCR数据(BioFire®FilmArray®RespiratoryPanel2.1Plus)到我们的儿科和儿科急诊部门。
    结果:病毒主要负责ARTI(99%),随着RSV成为涉及呼吸道感染的最常见药物,其次是人鼻病毒/肠道病毒和甲型流感。RSV和鼻病毒也是合并感染的主要药物。RSV在冬季占主导地位,而HRV/EV在跌倒期间的患病率高于RSV。一些病毒仅在共感染中传播(人类冠状病毒NL63,腺病毒,偏肺病毒,和副流感病毒1-3),而其他人主要引起单一感染(甲型和乙型流感)。SARS-CoV-2在单一感染(41%)和合并感染(59%)中均被检测到。
    结论:我们的分析强调了RSV的优势以及实施RSV预防策略的重要性。
    In Sicily (Italy), respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), rhinovirus (HRV), and influenza virus triggered epidemics among children, resulting in an increase in acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs). Our objective was to capture the epidemiology of respiratory infections in children, determining which pathogens were associated with respiratory infections following the lockdown and whether there were changes in the epidemiological landscape during the post-SARS-CoV-2 pandemic era.
    METHODS: We analyzed multiplex respiratory viral PCR data (BioFire® FilmArray® Respiratory Panel 2.1 Plus) from 204 children presenting with respiratory symptoms and/or fever to our Unit of Pediatrics and Pediatric Emergency.
    RESULTS: Viruses were predominantly responsible for ARTIs (99%), with RSV emerging as the most common agent involved in respiratory infections, followed by human rhinovirus/enterovirus and influenza A. RSV and rhinovirus were also the primary agents in coinfections. RSV predominated during winter months, while HRV/EV exhibited greater prevalence than RSV during the fall. Some viruses spread exclusively in coinfections (human coronavirus NL63, adenovirus, metapneumovirus, and parainfluenza viruses 1-3), while others primarily caused mono-infections (influenza A and B). SARS-CoV-2 was detected equally in both mono-infections (41%) and coinfections (59%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis underlines the predominance of RSV and the importance of implementing preventive strategies for RSV.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    当前的研究旨在评估酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)测定以及单重和多重实时逆转录PCR(rRT-PCR)在检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒中的效率2(SARS-CoV-2)和甲型和乙型流感病毒(甲型流感和乙型流感)。
    SARS-CoV-2特异性IgG和IgM抗体,还有,通过ELISA测定法测定流感A(H1N1和H3N2血清型)和流感病毒B抗体。采用一步qRT-PCR方法检测鼻咽拭子样品中的SARS-CoV-2。此外,使用基于探针的RT-PCR评估甲型和乙型流感病毒的存在。通过多重rRT-PCR方法同时检测SARS-CoV-2,甲型和乙型流感病毒。
    在33.3%和58.3%的患者中检测到SARSCoV-2IgM和IgG抗体,分别。相比之下,使用一步法单重RT-PCR方法在50%的患者中检测到SARSCoV-2基因组。在16.7%和8.3%的患者中发现了甲型流感血清型H1N1和H3N2。基于探针的RT-PCR显示39.3%的患者对甲型流感病毒呈阳性。多重rRT-PCR检测SARS-CoV-2、甲型流感、还有50%的乙型流感,39.3%,和19%的样本,分别。多重rRT-PCR检测的灵敏度和特异度分别为100%和55%,分别。与SARS-CoV-2,流感A,在9.5%的患者中发现了B型流感病毒。
    多重rRT-PCR可以用作偿还,用于SARS-CoV-2和流感病毒A/B的分子监测的具有成本效益和合适的工具。
    UNASSIGNED: The current study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) assay and monoplex and multiplex real-time reverse-transcription PCR (rRT-PCR) in the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and influenza A and B viruses (Flu A and Flu B).
    UNASSIGNED: The SARS-CoV-2 -specific IgG and IgM antibodies, as well as, Flu A (H1N1 and H3N2 serotypes) and Flu B virus antibodies were determined by ELISA assay. The one-step qRT-PCR method was used to detect the SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal swab samples. Furthermore, the presence of Flu A and B viruses was evaluated using probe-based RT-PCR. Simultaneous detection of SARS-CoV-2, Flu A and B viruses was performed by multiplex rRT-PCR assay.
    UNASSIGNED: SARS CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies were detected in 33.3% and 58.3% of patients, respectively. In contrast, the SARS CoV-2 genome was detected in 50% of patients using the one-step monoplex RT-PCR assay. Flu A serotypes H1N1 and H3N2 were found in 16.7% and 8.3% of patients. Probe-based RT-PCR revealed that 39.3% of patients were positive for the Flu A virus. Multiplex rRT-PCR detect the SARS-CoV-2, Flu A, and Flu B in 50%, 39.3%, and 19% of samples, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of multiplex rRT-PCR assay in comparison to monoplex RT-PCR were 100% and 55%, respectively. Coinfection with SARS-CoV-2, Flu A, and Flu B viruses was found in 9.5% of patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Multiplex rRT-PCR can be used as a repaid, cost-effective and suitable tool for molecular surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 and Flu A/B viruses.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:严重急性呼吸系统综合症冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2),甲型流感,呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)感染具有相似的传播方式和临床症状。有必要确定简单的诊断指标来区分这三种感染,特别是对于缺乏核酸检测试剂盒的社区医院和低收入和中等收入国家。这项研究使用临床数据来评估血常规检查在区分SARS-CoV-2,甲型流感,和儿童RSV感染。
    方法:本研究纳入了2022年12月至2023年6月在杭州儿童医院接受治疗的1420名儿童,其中351人患有SARS-CoV-2,671人患有流感,398人患有RSV。此外,还收集了243名健康儿童。将SARS-CoV-2患者的血液检测结果与甲型流感和RSV患者以及健康对照者的血液检测结果进行比较。采用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC-ROC)评价各血液参数的诊断价值。
    结果:患有SARS-CoV-2的儿童表现出明显升高的白细胞(WBC)计数水平,血小板(PLT)计数,中性粒细胞计数,中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)与甲型流感患者相比(P<0.05)。相比之下,与其他个体相比,SARS-CoV-2患者的平均血小板体积与血小板计数之比(MPV/PLT)和淋巴细胞与单核细胞之比(LMR)降低(P<0.05)。这些参数的AUC在0.5和0.7之间。与RSV患者相比,SARS-CoV-2患者MPV/PLT显著增高,WBC显著降低,淋巴细胞,PLT,LMR,和淋巴细胞乘以血小板(LYM*PLT)值(P<0.05)。然而,对于所有年龄组,只有LYM*PLT的诊断值高于0.7.与健康儿童相比,患有COVID-19的儿童表现出升高的NLR和MPV/PLT水平,伴随着淋巴细胞减少,PLT,LMR,和LYM*PLT值。(P<0.05)。LMR的AUC,LYM*PLT,所有年龄组的PLT都在0.7以上,表明有希望的诊断价值。
    结论:COVID-19、甲型流感、和RSV在疾病早期存在显着差异,临床医生可用于区分3种感染类型。
    BACKGROUND: The Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), influenza A, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infections have similar modes of transmission and clinical symptoms. There is a need to identify simple diagnostic indicators to distinguish these three infections, particularly for community hospitals and low- and middle-income countries that lack nucleic acid detection kits. This study used clinical data to assess the diagnostic value of routine blood tests in differentiating between SARS-CoV-2, influenza A, and RSV infections in children.
    METHODS: A total of 1420 children treated at the Hangzhou Children\'s Hospital between December 2022 and June 2023 were enrolled in this study, of whom 351 had SARS-CoV-2, 671 had influenza, and 398 had RSV. In addition, 243 healthy children were also collected. The blood test results of SARS-CoV-2 patients were compared to those of patients with influenza A and RSV and the healthy controls. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) was employed to evaluate each blood parameter\'s diagnostic value.
    RESULTS: Children with SARS-CoV-2 exhibited notably elevated levels of white blood cell (WBC) count, platelet (PLT) count, neutrophil count, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) compared to influenza A patients (P < 0.05). In contrast, SARS-CoV-2 patients exhibited a decrease in the mean platelet volume to platelet count ratio (MPV/PLT) and the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) when compared to other individuals (P < 0.05). These parameters had an AUC between 0.5 and 0.7. Compared to patients with RSV, SARS-CoV-2 patients had significantly higher MPV/PLT and significantly lower WBC, lymphocyte, PLT, LMR, and lymphocyte multiplied by platelet (LYM*PLT) values (P < 0.05). However, only LYM*PLT had an acceptable diagnostic value above 0.7 for all age groups. Compared to healthy children, children with COVID-19 exhibited elevated NLR and MPV/PLT levels, alongside decreased lymphocyte, PLT, LMR, and LYM*PLT values. (P < 0.05). The AUC of the LMR, LYM*PLT, and PLT were above 0.7 in all age groups, indicating promising diagnostic values.
    CONCLUSIONS: The routine blood parameters among patients with COVID-19, influenza A, and RSV differ significantly early in the disease and could be used by clinicians to discriminate between the 3 types of infection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    甲型流感是在流感季节从儿科诊所分离的最常见的病毒病原体。一些年轻的流感患者表现出快速进展,高热和严重的后遗症,如肺炎和脑膜炎。因此,早期诊断和及时治疗非常重要。目前特定的诊断测试包括抗原检测,抗体检测,核酸检测和病毒分离。快速抗原检测是门诊最常用的方法,但是经常观察到假阴性结果,这导致延迟治疗和严重的结果。血常规检查是门诊患者最常用的检测方法。将特定的血细胞计数纳入快速抗原测试可以克服一些技术问题并实现准确的早期诊断。
    我们从儿科门诊患者中招募了537名患有流感样症状(如发热或呼吸道症状)的儿童和110名没有传染病的儿童进行控制。对患者进行常规分析仪血常规检测和甲型流感病毒抗原检测。通过统计检验检查组间的血常规参数。通过受试者工作特征曲线评估血常规检测参数,寻找甲型流感筛查指标,采用多因素logistic回归建立筛选模型中血常规参数的最优组合。
    根据年龄设置两个亚组:≤6岁组和>6岁组。在每一组中,将患者进一步分为三个亚组:流感A阳性结果组(A组)(n=259),甲型流感阴性组(A组)(n=277)和健康对照组(H组)(n=110)。大多数常规血液参数在每个年龄组的三个亚组之间显示出显着差异。值得注意的是,淋巴细胞(LYM)数,血小板(PLT)数,淋巴细胞与单核细胞比率(LMR)和LYM乘以PLT(LYM*PLT)表现出极其显着的差异。使用A-组作为基于曲线下面积(AUC)的参考,两个年龄组的趋势相似.对于A-组,LYM*PLT的最佳截止值为221.6,AUC,≤6岁组的敏感性和特异性分别为0.6830、55.71%和76.92%。同时,LYM*PLT的截止值为196.7,AUC,灵敏度和特异度分别为0.6448、53.97%和70.81%,分别在>6岁组。基于多因素logistic回归模型的筛选模型显示,LYM*PLT是≤6岁组的最优参数组合(AUC=0.7202),而LYM和PLT是>6岁组的最佳参数组合(AUC=0.6760)。
    甲型流感患儿的几个血常规指标在两个年龄亚组中都有差异。LYM*PLT显示出流感感染的潜在筛查价值。
    UNASSIGNED: Influenza A is the most common viral pathogen isolated from pediatric clinics during influenza seasons. Some young patients with influenza manifest rapid progression with high fever and severe sequelae, such as pneumonia and meningitis. Therefore, early diagnosis and prompt treatment are highly important. Specific diagnostic tests currently include antigen detection, antibody detection, nucleic acid test and virus isolation. Rapid antigen testing is the most commonly adopted method in the outpatient setting, but false negative results are frequently observed, which causes delayed treatment and severe outcome. Routine blood test is the most commonly used detection for the outpatients. Incorporating specific blood cell counts into rapid antigen test may overcome some technical issues and enable accurate early diagnosis.
    UNASSIGNED: We enrolled 537 children with influenza-like symptoms like fever or respiratory symptoms from pediatric outpatients and 110 children without infectious diseases for control. Routine blood tests detected by a routine analyzer and influenza A virus antigen detection were performed in the patients. Significant blood routine parameters between groups were examined by statistical tests. Parameters in routine blood test were assessed by the receiver operating characteristic curve to find the screening indicators of influenza A. Multivariate logistic regression were used to establish the optimal combinations of blood routine parameters in our screening model.
    UNASSIGNED: Two subgroups were set according to age: ≤6 years old group and >6 years old group. In each group, patients were further divided into three subgroups: the influenza A-positive-result group (A+ group) (n=259), influenza A-negative-result group (A- group) (n=277) and healthy control group (H group) (n=110). Most routine blood parameters showed significant differences among the three subgroups in each age group. Notably, lymphocyte (LYM) number, platelet (PLT) number, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) and LYM multiplied by PLT (LYM*PLT) exhibited extremely significant differences. Using A- group as a reference based on the area under the curve (AUC), both age groups had a similar trend. For A- group, the optimal cutoff value of LYM*PLT was 221.6, the AUC, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.6830, 55.71% and 76.92% in the ≤6 years old group. Meanwhile, the cutoff value of LYM*PLT was 196.7, and the AUC, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.6448, 53.97% and 70.81%, respectively in the >6 years old group. Screening model based on multivariate logistic regression model revealed that LYM*PLT was the optimal parameter combinations in ≤6 years old group (AUC =0.7202), while LYM and PLT were the optimal parameter combinations in >6 years old group (AUC =0.6760).
    UNASSIGNED: Several blood routine parameters in children with influenza A demonstrate differential levels in both age subgroups. The LYM*PLT exhibits the potential screening value of influenza infection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项工作强调了来自不同来源的H1N1病毒的两种三聚体HA蛋白的结构和动力学,加利福尼亚大流行(HACal)及其最接近的印度邻居(HAInd),分别于2009年和2018年报告。因为突变,HAInd获得新的N-糖基化和表位结合位点以及RBD突变,这可能会触发病毒-宿主相互作用机制的改变。对HA三聚体进行250ns的分子动力学模拟揭示了由HA单体的灵活性继承的HACal三聚体的高度动态性质。在三聚体中,一个单体的动力学比其他单体更明显,增强的RBD动力学尤其引起了人们的注意,因为它们在融合过程中起着关键作用。相反,突变HAInd三聚体有效地建立了更多的H键相互作用,因此,三聚体经历更稳定的动力学,RBD动力学的幅度相对较低,经减少的RMSD认可,Rg,和SASA变体。为两个菌株的子域解剖的合作和反合作运动也揭示了RBD相对于其他子域的显着反相关运动。在协议中,稳定HAInd的自由能景观的特征还在于单个最低宽能量盆地,而不是HACal三聚体的两个最小能量盆地。实质上,突变HAInd获得了具有新功能特征的高度稳定的构象,这要求(i)进一步研究病毒-宿主结合机制中出现的突变介导的变异,以及(ii)需要进一步设计位点特异性潜在抑制剂以应对未来的挑战。由RamaswamyH.Sarma沟通。
    This work highlights the structure and dynamics of two trimeric HA proteins of the H1N1 virus from different origins, the pandemic Californian (HACal) and its closest Indian neighbor (HAInd), reported in 2009 and 2018, respectively. Because of mutation, HAInd acquires new N-glycosylation and epitope binding sites along with mutations at RBD, which might trigger an altered viral-host interaction mechanism. Molecular dynamics simulations performed on HA trimers for a period of 250 ns reveal the highly dynamic nature of HACal trimers inherited by the flexibility of HA monomers. In the trimer, the dynamics of one monomer are more pronounced compared to others, and the enhanced dynamics of RBD especially gain attention as they plays a key role during fusion. Conversely, the mutant HAInd trimer effectively establishes more H-bond interactions, and accordingly, the trimer undergoes more stabilized dynamics with a relatively lower amplitude of RBD dynamics, as endorsed by the reduced RMSD, Rg, and SASA variations. The cooperative and anti-cooperative motions dissected for the subdomains of both strains also reveal a prominent anticorrelative motion of RBD against other subdomains. In agreement, the free energy landscape of stable HAInd is also characterized by a single lowest wide energy basin instead of the two minimum energy basins of the HACal trimer. In essence, the mutant HAInd acquires a highly stable conformation with novel functional features, which calls for (i) further investigation on the emerging mutation-mediated variation in viral-host binding mechanism and (ii) the need for further design of site-specific potential inhibitors to face future challenges.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在参加图巴大法宝(GMT)的朝圣者中,流感很常见,在塞内加尔,有可能在他们回家后传播给联系人。
    方法:2021年格林威治标准时间期间,在靠近图巴的Mbacké市的一家医疗保健中心进行疾病朝圣者咨询,朝圣者返回Dielmo和Ndiop村庄,2021年未前往Touba并在这两个村庄的卫生保健中心咨询的患者通过鼻咽样本的聚合酶链反应检测了流感病毒。进行了甲型流感病毒基因组的下一代测序以及比较和系统发育分析。
    结果:685名患者中,共有62名甲型流感病毒检测呈阳性,包括9月下旬在Mbacké接受咨询的53人中的34人,十月初回国的129名朝圣者中有6人,从10月3日至29日,42名村民中有20名。共获得27个基因组。根据系统发育分析观察到四个簇,这表明Mbacké患者和返回的朝圣者可能与居住在未参加GMT的村庄的患者共享密切相关的病毒株。
    结论:Ndiop和Dielmo的村民可能感染了源自GMT的病毒株,可能是由从GMT返回的朝圣者输入的。
    OBJECTIVE: Influenza is frequent among pilgrims participating in the Grand Magal de Touba (GMT), in Senegal, with a potential to spread to contacts when they return home.
    METHODS: Ill pilgrims consulting at a health care center in Mbacké city close to Touba during the 2021 GMT, pilgrims returning to Dielmo and Ndiop villages, and patients who did not travel to Touba and consulted at health care centers in these two villages in 2021 were tested for the influenza virus by polymerase chain reaction on nasopharyngeal samples. Next-generation sequencing and comparative and phylogenetic analyses of influenza A virus genomes were performed.
    RESULTS: A total of 62 of 685 patients tested positive for influenza A virus, including 34 of 53 who were consulted in Mbacké in late September, six of 129 pilgrims who returned home in early October, and 20 of 42 villagers from October 3 to 29. A total of 27 genomes were obtained. Four clusters were observed based on the phylogenetic analyses, suggesting that Mbacké patients and returned pilgrims may have shared closely related viral strains with patients inhabiting the villages who did not participate in the GMT.
    CONCLUSIONS: Villagers in Ndiop and Dielmo may have been infected with viral strains originating from the GMT and possibly imported by pilgrims who returned from the GMT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    这项研究探讨了2009年流感大流行A(H1N1)和SARS-CoV-2BA.2变种(Omicron)感染在65岁以下患者中的临床特征差异,改善对这些疾病的识别并更好地应对当前的流行病。
    收集了2009年5月至7月诊断出的127名2009年大流行性流感A(H1N1)患者和2022年3月至5月诊断出的3,265名Omicron患者的数据。使用基于年龄的1:2匹配(差异<2岁),性别,和潜在的疾病,对115例2009年甲型H1N1流感(H1N1)感染患者(H1N1组)和230例SARS-CoV-2OmicronBA.2感染患者(Omicron组)的数据进行分析.比较两组患者的临床表现,采用logistic回归分析确定各组可能的独立危险因素,采用多元线性回归分析核酸阴性(NAN)时间的预测因素。
    两组的中位[四分位距]年龄为21[11,26]岁。与H1N1组相比,Omicron组:白细胞计数和C反应蛋白水平较低;发热较少,鼻塞,喉咙痛,咳嗽,痰,头痛;更多的嗅觉丧失,肌肉酸痛,和乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)异常。Omicron组的患者使用较少的抗生素和抗病毒药物,NAN的时间更长(17[14,20]VS4[3,5]天,P<0.001)。Logistic回归显示发热,咳嗽,头痛,白细胞计数增加与H1N1组的相关性更强,而肌肉酸痛和LDH异常与Omicron组的相关性更强。发烧(B1.529,95%置信区间[0.149,2.909],P=0.030)显着预测Omicron患者NAN的时间更长。
    SARS-CoV-2Omicron感染与2009年大流行性流感A(H1N1)感染在临床特征上存在显着差异。认识到这些差异对临床实践具有重要意义。
    This study explored the differences in clinical characteristics between the 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) and SARS-CoV-2 BA.2 variant (Omicron) infections in patients younger than age 65 years, to improve identification of these diseases and better respond to the current epidemic.
    Data from 127 patients with the 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) diagnosed between May and July of 2009 and 3,265 patients with Omicron diagnosed between March and May of 2022 were collected. Using a 1:2 match based on age (difference <2 years), sex, and underlying diseases, data from 115 patients with the 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) infection (H1N1 group) and 230 patients with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2 infection (Omicron group) were analyzed. The clinical manifestations were compared between the groups, logistic regression was performed to identify possible independent risk factors for each group, and multiple linear regression was used to analyze the factors predicting time for nucleic acid negativization (NAN).
    The median [interquartile range] age of the two groups was 21 [11, 26] years. Compared with the H1N1 group, the Omicron group had: lower white blood cell counts and C-reactive protein levels; less fever, nasal congestion, sore throat, cough, sputum, and headache; and more olfactory loss, muscle soreness, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) abnormalities. Patients in the Omicron group used fewer antibiotics and antiviral drugs, and the time for NAN was longer (17 [14,20] VS 4 [3,5] days, P<0.001). Logistic regression showed that fever, cough, headache, and increased white blood cell count were more strongly correlated with the H1N1 group, while muscle soreness and LDH abnormalities were more strongly correlated with the Omicron group. Fever (B 1.529, 95% confidence interval [0.149,2.909], P=0.030) significantly predicted a longer time for NAN in patients with Omicron.
    There are significant differences in clinical characteristics between SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection and the 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) infection. Recognition of these differences has important implications for clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:Pimodivir是甲型流感聚合酶复合物的一类第一聚合酶碱性蛋白2(PB2)亚基抑制剂。随机双盲安慰剂对照2b期TOPAZ研究证明了单独每日两次匹莫迪夫的抗病毒活性和安全性(300毫克,600毫克)或与奥司他韦(匹莫迪夫600毫克,奥司他韦75mg)在患有急性无并发症流感A的成人研究参与者中报道了本研究中观察到的病毒变体的详细基因型和表型特征。
    方法:PB2和神经氨酸酶基因的群体测序,和表型敏感性测试,使用基线和最后一次病毒阳性的基线后鼻拭子样本进行。
    结果:对223名确诊甲型流感感染的随机研究参与者中的206名(92.4%)的基线样本进行测序,发现在pimofir的任何预定义PB2感兴趣的位置均未发现多态性,并且未观察到表型降低对pimofir的易感性。105/223(47.1%)参与者的基线后测序数据确定了10(9.5%)参与者(pimodivir300mg:n=3;600mg:n=6;组合:n=1;安慰剂:n=0)在感兴趣的氨基酸位置出现了PB2突变,包括位置S324,F325,S337,K376,T378和N510。这些新出现的突变通常与pimodivir易感性降低有关,但不是病毒突破。在pimodivir加奥司他韦组出现PB2突变的一名(1.8%)参与者中未观察到表型易感性降低。
    结论:在TOPAZ研究中接受匹莫非治疗的急性单纯性甲型流感患者很少出现对匹莫非的易感性降低,匹莫非与奥司他韦联合进一步降低了易感性降低的风险。
    Pimodivir is a first-in-class polymerase basic protein 2 (PB2) subunit inhibitor of the influenza A polymerase complex. The randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled phase 2b TOPAZ study demonstrated antiviral activity and safety of twice daily pimodivir alone (300 mg, 600 mg) or in combination with oseltamivir (pimodivir 600 mg, oseltamivir 75 mg) in adult study participants with acute uncomplicated influenza A. The detailed genotypic and phenotypic characterization of viral variants observed in this study are reported.
    Population sequencing of PB2 and neuraminidase genes, and phenotypic susceptibility testing, were performed using baseline and last virus-positive post-baseline nasal swab samples.
    Sequencing of baseline samples in 206 of 223 (92.4%) randomized study participants with confirmed influenza A infection identified no polymorphisms at any predefined PB2 positions of interest for pimodivir and no phenotypic reduced susceptibility to pimodivir was observed. Post-baseline sequencing data for 105/223 (47.1%) participants identified emergence of PB2 mutations at amino acid positions of interest in 10 (9.5%) participants (pimodivir 300 mg: n = 3; 600 mg: n = 6; combination: n = 1; placebo: n = 0) and included positions S324, F325, S337, K376, T378, and N510. These emerging mutations were typically associated with decreased pimodivir susceptibility, but not viral breakthrough. No reduced phenotypic susceptibility was observed in the one (1.8%) participant with emerging PB2 mutations from the pimodivir plus oseltamivir group.
    Participants with acute uncomplicated influenza A treated with pimodivir in the TOPAZ study infrequently developed reduced susceptibility to pimodivir and combining pimodivir with oseltamivir further decreased the risk of reduced susceptibility development.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    据广泛报道,COVID-19患者的肝脏检查升高。基于人群的研究,利用药物诱导的肝损伤(DILI)的有效分析,与对照组的其他病毒性疾病和随访在很大程度上缺乏。
    所有2020年的SARS-CoV-2和2009年的甲型H1N1流感的住院患者都纳入了该回顾性研究,以人群为基础的研究。比较两组之间的肝脏测试,并评估与炎症标志物和丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)升高的持续性的相关性。使用RousselUclaf因果关系评估方法(RUCAM)审查了潜在的DILI病例。
    225例SARS-CoV-2阳性和73例甲型H1N1流感阳性患者被纳入。两组之间的肝脏测试值相似,天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)在COVID-19中显著降低,平均差为26U/L(95CI4.2-47)。铁蛋白升高与ALT呈正相关,AST和碱性磷酸酶。没有患者在COVID-19中ALT持续升高,也没有患者可能患有DILI。根据RUCAM,只有3名患者可能患有DILI。
    肝酶升高对COVID-19没有特异性。高铁蛋白血症与肝脏检查升高有关。DILI在COVID-19中非常罕见,并且不太可能是COVID-19肝酶升高的原因。在这些患者中,异常的肝脏检查是非持续性的,并且通常在临床上不重要。
    Elevated liver tests in patients with COVID-19 are widely reported. Population-based studies utilizing a validated analysis of drug-induced liver injury (DILI), with a control group of other viral illnesses and follow-up are largely lacking.
    All hospitalized patients in Iceland with SARS-CoV-2 in 2020 and pandemic influenza A (H1N1) in 2009 were included in this retrospective, population-based study. Liver tests were compared between the two groups and the correlation to inflammatory markers and persistence of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevations were assessed. Potential DILI cases were reviewed using the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM).
    225 SARS-CoV-2-positive and 73 influenza A (H1N1)-positive patients were included. Liver test values were similar between the groups, except for aspartate aminotransferase (AST) which was significantly lower in COVID-19, with a mean difference of 26 U/L (95%CI 4.2-47). Ferritin elevation was positively correlated with ALT, AST and alkaline phosphatase. No patient had persistently elevated ALT in COVID-19 and none had a probable DILI. Only 3 patients had a possible DILI according to the RUCAM.
    Elevated liver enzymes are not specific for COVID-19. Hyperferritinemia was associated with elevated liver tests. DILI was very rare in COVID-19 and an unlikely cause of elevated liver enzymes in COVID-19. Abnormal liver tests are nonpersistent and generally not clinically important in these patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号