incisional hernia

切口疝
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    切口疝是指先前手术切口部位的腹壁缺损。在本文中,我们描述了两名患者,他们在几年前曾接受过开放性肾结石手术,并且患有同侧复发性结石。他们都通过微型经皮肾镜碎石术(PCNL)治疗肾结石。病例1是一名50岁的女性,在开放手术5年后患有右侧复发性鹿角结石,需要两次PCNL手术才能达到无石状态。病例2是一名74岁的男性,有明显的合并症,在10年的开放性肾镜取石术后,患有右27毫米复发性肾结石。两名患者在PCNL术后均无并发症。这些病例表明,在腰椎切口瘢痕疝的病例中,具有超声引导和正确患者定位的微型PCNL可能是肾结石治疗的最佳方法。
    Incisional hernia refers to an abdominal wall defect at the site of a previous surgical incision. In this paper, we describe two patients who previously underwent open kidney stone surgery several years ago and had the ipsilateral recurrent stones. They were both managed by a mini percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) to treat kidney stones. Case 1 was a 50-year-old female with right recurrent staghorn stones after 5 years of open surgery and required two PCNL procedures to achieve stone-free status. Case 2 was a 74-year-old male with significant comorbidities who had a right 27 mm recurrent kidney stone after 10 years of open nephrolithotomy. Both patients experienced no postoperative complications after PCNL. These cases show that in cases of lumbar incisional scar hernias, mini PCNL with ultrasound guidance and proper patient positioning can be an optimal approach for kidney stone treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:腹腔镜IPOM在技术上具有挑战性,特别是关于筋膜闭合。混合修复已被提出作为一种更简单的方法。我们旨在比较接受腹侧疝修补术(VHR)的患者的混合和腹腔镜腹膜内嵌式网片修补术(IPOM)。
    方法:我们对Cochrane,Scopus,和MEDLINE数据库,以确定比较混合与腹腔镜IPOMVHR报告复发结果的研究,死亡率,血清肿,术后并发症,再操作,手术部位感染,和手术时间。使用RStudio4.1.2使用随机效应模型进行统计分析。
    结果:我们筛选了2,896篇文章,并对其中22篇进行了全面审查。总共有五项研究,纳入664例患者.其中,337例(50.8%)行腹腔镜IPOM。所有病人都有切口疝,平均直径从3到12.7厘米不等,60%是女性,平均BMI从29.5到38不等。与腹腔镜相比,混合方法的血清肿发生率较低(OR0.22;95%CI0.05至0.92;p=0.038;I²=78%)。我们发现复发没有差异,死亡率,术后并发症,再操作,手术部位感染,和组间手术时间。
    结论:混合IPOM是一种安全有效的切口疝修补方法。此外,它有助于筋膜缺损闭合并减少术后血清瘤。
    BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic IPOM is technically challenging, especially regarding fascial closure. Hybrid repair has been proposed as a simpler approach. We aimed to compare hybrid and laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair (IPOM) in patients undergoing ventral hernia repair (VHR).
    METHODS: We performed a systematic review of Cochrane, Scopus, and MEDLINE databases to identify studies comparing hybrid versus laparoscopic IPOM VHR reporting the outcomes of recurrence, mortality, seroma, postoperative complications, reoperation, surgical site infection, and operative time. Statistical analysis was performed using RStudio 4.1.2 using a random-effects model.
    RESULTS: We screened 2,896 articles and fully reviewed 22 of them. A total of five studies, encompassing 664 patients were included. Among them, 337 (50.8%) underwent laparoscopic IPOM. All patients had incisional hernias, with a mean diameter varying from 3 to 12.7 cm, 60% were women, with a mean BMI varying from 29.5 to 38. The hybrid approach had a lower rate of seroma when compared to the laparoscopic (OR 0.22; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.92; p = 0.038; I²=78%). We found no difference in recurrence, mortality, postoperative complications, reoperation, surgical site infection, and operative time between groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Hybrid IPOM is a safe and effective method for incisional hernia repair. Moreover, it facilitates fascial defect closure and decreases postoperative seromas.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:切口疝主要通过开放或腹腔镜手术治疗,每种方法都会影响康复和患者报告的结局。这强调了需要可靠的评估工具,例如EuraHS-QoL问卷来评估手术后的生活质量。方法:这项前瞻性单中心研究旨在评估腹腔镜与开放式疝修补术后的手术结果和患者满意度。它涉及222名按方法类型分类的患者。术前以及术后1个月和3个月使用EuraHS-QoL问卷,使用OriginPro2018和SPSS软件28.0版进行数据分析。结果:在参与者中,152名女性和70名男性,78%接受开腹手术,22%接受腹腔镜手术。研究结果表明,在疼痛管理方面,腹腔镜修复术的患者预后较好,日常活动,和审美满意度。患者报告腹腔镜手术后疼痛程度明显降低,日常活动限制较少。虽然最初的术后美容结果有利于腹腔镜方法,腹部形状的感知差异随着时间的推移而减少。结论:与开腹手术相比,腹腔镜修复术显著提高了患者的生活质量,如EuraHS-QoL评分所示。这些结果支持在适当情况下使用腹腔镜技术,因为它们在减轻疼痛和更快的功能恢复方面具有优势。
    Background: Incisional hernias are predominantly treated through open or laparoscopic surgery, with each method influencing recovery and patient-reported outcomes. This underscores the need for reliable assessment tools such as the EuraHS-QoL questionnaire to evaluate quality of life after surgery. Methods: This prospective single-center study was aimed at evaluating aestethic outcomes and patient satisfaction following laparoscopic versus open hernia repair. It involved 222 patients categorized by type of approach. The EuraHS-QoL questionnaire was used preoperatively and at 1- and 3-months post-surgery, with data analysis performed using Origin Pro 2018 and SPSS software version 28.0. Results: Among the participants, 152 were females and 70 males, with 78% undergoing open surgery and 22% laparoscopic. Findings revealed superior patient outcomes with laparoscopic repair in terms of pain management, daily activities, and aesthetic satisfaction. Patients reported significantly lower pain levels and fewer restrictions in daily activities post-laparoscopic surgery. While initial postoperative cosmetic results favored laparoscopic methods, the perceived differences in abdominal shape diminished over time. Conclusions: Laparoscopic repair significantly improves quality of life compared to open surgery, as shown by EuraHS-QoL scores. These results support the use of laparoscopic techniques in appropriate cases due to their benefits in pain reduction and faster functional recovery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们的研究解决了腹侧疝修补术文献中的空白,关于机器人经腹直肌后脐假体修复(r-TARUP)治疗原发性和切口腹侧疝的长期有效性。本研究旨在报告3年复发率和总体患者预后,包括生活质量。
    对2018年8月至2022年1月的101例择期r-TARUP患者进行前瞻性收集数据的回顾性分析。收集的数据包括人口统计,疝气大小,网格类型,术后结局和手术前后的欧洲疝学会生活质量问卷(EuraHS-QoL)。
    该组患者的平均年龄为53岁,平均体重指数(BMI)为32kg/m,54%的切口疝和46%的原发性疝,平均长度和宽度分别为4.4厘米和6.1厘米,利用合成的58%和生物可吸收的42%网眼类型。大多数被归类为疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)一级伤口。术后并发症包括血清肿(2%),血肿(3%),这需要手术干预,与网格类型没有显著相关性。腹横肌释放(TAR)与住院时间增加之间存在强正相关(相关系数:0.731,p<0.001)。与术后3年的评估相比,术前生活质量评估显示出统计学上的显着改善。平均值(±SD)为61.61±5.29与13.84±2.6(p<0.001)。平均随访34.4个月,1年无疝气复发,2-3年随访3次复发(3.2%)。
    r-TARUP技术已被证明对修复原发性和切口腹侧疝是安全有效的,随访期间复发率低,生活质量(QoL)明显改善。
    UNASSIGNED: Our study addresses the gap in ventral hernia repair literature, regarding the long-term effectiveness of robotic transabdominal retrorectus umbilical prosthetic repair (r-TARUP) for primary and incisional ventral hernias. This study aimed to report the 3-year recurrence rates and overall patient outcomes including quality of life.
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective review of prospective collected data analyzed 101 elective r-TARUP patients from August 2018 to January 2022. Data collected included demographics, hernia sizes, mesh types, postoperative outcomes and the European Hernia Society Quality of Life questionnaire (EuraHS-QoL) before and after surgery.
    UNASSIGNED: The average age of the group of patients was 53, having a mean body mass index (BMI) of 32 kg/m, with 54% incisional and 46% primary hernias, with mean length and width of 4.4 cm and 6.1 cm, utilizing synthetic 58% and bioabsorbable 42% mesh types. The majority were classified as Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) class I wounds. Postoperative complications included seroma (2%), hematoma (3%), which required surgical intervention, with no significant correlation to mesh type. A strong positive correlation was found between Transversus Abdominis Release (TAR) and increased length of hospital stay (correlation coefficient: 0.731, p < 0.001). Preoperative quality of life assessments demonstrated statistically significant improvements when compared to postoperative assessments at 3 years, with a mean (±SD) of 61.61 ± 5.29 vs. 13.84 ± 2.6 (p < 0.001). Mean follow up of 34.4 months with no hernia recurrence at 1 year and 3 recurrence at the 2-3 years follow up (3.2%).
    UNASSIGNED: The r-TARUP technique has proven to be safe and effective for repairing primary and incisional ventral hernias, with a low recurrence rate during this follow up period with a noticeable improvement in quality of life (QoL).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:会阴疝(PH)是腹部手术切除(APR)的晚期并发症,可能会损害患者的生活质量。机器人APR采用近期直肠癌治疗策略后PH的频率和危险因素仍不清楚。
    方法:对2011年12月至2022年6月接受机器人APR治疗的直肠癌患者进行回顾性检查。从2020年7月开始,骨盆加固程序,例如骨盆腹膜和肛提肌的机器人闭合,在可行的情况下作为PH的预防程序进行。手术后1年使用计算机断层扫描诊断有或无症状的患者的PH。我们检查了PH的频率,有PH(PH+)和无PH(PH-)患者之间的比较特征,并确定了PH的危险因素。
    结果:我们评估了142例患者,其中PH+53(37.3%),PH-89(62.6%)。PH+的术前放化疗率明显较高(26.4%对10.1%,p=0.017),并且接受骨盆加固手术的比率显着降低(1.9%对14.0%,p=0.017)。PH+侧方淋巴结清扫率较低(47.2%对61.8%,p=0.115)和更短的手术时间(340分钟对394分钟,p=0.110)。根据多变量分析,PH的独立危险因素为术前放化疗,没有进行外侧淋巴结清扫术,也没有接受骨盆加固手术.
    结论:在最近的直肠癌治疗策略下,机器人APR治疗直肠癌后的PH并不是罕见的并发症,应考虑对PH进行预防性操作。
    BACKGROUND: Perineal hernia (PH) is a late complication of abdominoperineal resection (APR) that may compromise a patient\'s quality of life. The frequency and risk factors for PH after robotic APR adopting recent rectal cancer treatment strategies remain unclear.
    METHODS: Patients who underwent robotic APR for rectal cancer between December 2011 and June 2022 were retrospectively examined. From July 2020, pelvic reinforcement procedures, such as robotic closure of the pelvic peritoneum and levator ani muscles, were performed as prophylactic procedures for PH whenever feasible. PH was diagnosed in patients with or without symptoms using computed tomography 1 year after surgery. We examined the frequency of PH, compared characteristics between patients with PH (PH+) and without PH (PH-), and identified risk factors for PH.
    RESULTS: We evaluated 142 patients, including 53 PH+ (37.3%) and 89 PH- (62.6%). PH+ had a significantly higher rate of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (26.4% versus 10.1%, p = 0.017) and a significantly lower rate of undergoing pelvic reinforcement procedures (1.9% versus 14.0%, p = 0.017). PH+ had a lower rate of lateral lymph node dissection (47.2% versus 61.8%, p = 0.115) and a shorter operative time (340 min versus 394 min, p = 0.110). According to multivariate analysis, the independent risk factors for PH were preoperative chemoradiotherapy, not undergoing lateral lymph node dissection, and not undergoing a pelvic reinforcement procedure.
    CONCLUSIONS: PH after robotic APR for rectal cancer is not a rare complication under the recent treatment strategies for rectal cancer, and performing prophylactic procedures for PH should be considered.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们旨在评估切口疝修补术后术后前30天的手术伤口并发症对患者长期生活质量的影响。此外,还将评估手术技术和术前合并症对患者生活质量的影响.
    方法:前瞻性队列研究,该研究使用onlay和后肌技术评估了2019年至2020年间接受切口疝修补术的115例患者。这些患者最初在术后前30天评估手术伤口结果(手术部位感染(SSI)或手术部位发生(SSO))。然后,三年后评估,通过一份特定的生活质量问卷,疝相关生活质量调查(HerQLes)。
    结果:一些患者在研究期间失去随访,由于死亡,接触困难,拒绝回答问卷,对80例患者进行了评估。其中,11例患者(13.8%)在术后前30天有SSI,37例(46.3%)有某种类型的SSO。未发现SSI和SSO对生活质量指数的影响。在分析其他变量时,我们观察到体重指数(BMI)对患者的生活质量有显著影响.同样,疝大小和网孔大小被确定为与较差生活质量结局相关的变量.在使用的手术技术方面没有观察到差异。
    结论:在本研究中,使用HerQLes评分未发现手术伤口结局(SSO和SSI)与较差的生活质量结果之间的关系.我们观察到BMI以及网眼和疝气的大小与生活质量指数呈成反比关系。然而,应开展更多的研究评估术前生活质量指数,并将其与术后指标进行比较,以评估这些相关性。
    OBJECTIVE: We aim to evaluate the impact of surgical wound complications in the first 30 postoperative days after incisional hernia repair on the long-term quality of life of patients. In addition, the impact of the surgical technique and preoperative comorbidities on the quality of life of patients will also be evaluated.
    METHODS: Prospective cohort study, which evaluates 115 patients who underwent incisional hernioplasty between 2019 and 2020, using the onlay and retromuscular techniques. These patients were initially assessed with regard to surgical wound outcomes in the first 30 postoperative days (surgical site infection (SSI) or surgical site occurrence (SSO)), and then, assessed after three years, through a specific quality of life questionnaire, the Hernia Related Quality of Life Survey (HerQLes).
    RESULTS: After some patients were lost to follow-up during the study period, due to death, difficulty in contact, refusal to respond to the questionnaire, eighty patients were evaluated. Of these, 11 patients (13.8%) had SSI in the first 30 postoperative days and 37 (46.3%) had some type of SSO. The impact of both SSI and SSO on quality of life indices was not identified. When analyzing others variables, we observed that the Body Mass Index (BMI) had a significant impact on the patients\' quality of life. Likewise, hernia size and mesh size were identified as variables related to a worse quality of life outcome. No difference was observed regarding the surgical techniques used.
    CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, no relationship was identified between surgical wound outcomes (SSO and SSI) and worse quality of life results using the HerQLes score. We observed that both BMI and the size of meshes and hernias showed an inversely proportional relationship with quality of life indices. However, more studies evaluating preoperative quality of life indices and comparing them with postoperative indices should be carried out to evaluate these correlations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    饮食因素与疝气之间的关系目前尚不清楚。
    英国生物库用于提取用作暴露的饮食因素,包括酒精的摄入,非油性鱼,牛肉,新鲜水果,油性鱼,沙拉/生蔬菜,干果,咖啡,麦片,盐,茶,水,煮熟的蔬菜,奶酪,羊肉/羊肉,猪肉,家禽,加工肉,和面包。FinnGen生物库用于获得关于疝气的GWAS数据作为结果。这项研究的主要分析是使用加权中位数进行的,MR-Egger,和IVW方法。Cochran的Q检验用于评估异质性。为了找到潜在的异常值,使用MR-PRESSO方法。采用留一法分析评估IVW方法的稳健性。
    每周饮酒(OR:0.614;p=0.00614)可降低腹股沟疝的风险。饮酒频率(OR:1.309;p=0.0477)增加了腹侧疝(主要包括切口疝和造口旁疝)的风险。摄入非油性鱼(OR:2.945;p=0.0214)会增加腹股沟疝的风险。添加到食物中的盐(OR:1.841;p=0.00267)会增加脐疝的风险。奶酪摄入量(OR:0.434;p=0.000536)和干果摄入量(OR:0.322;p=0.00716)降低了腹壁疝的风险,而摄入煮熟的蔬菜(OR:4.475;p=0.0380)会增加腹侧疝的风险。未发现其他饮食因素与疝气的因果关系。
    腹股沟,脐带缆,脐带缆腹侧疝都与饮食因素有关。
    UNASSIGNED: The relationship between dietary factors and hernias is currently unclear.
    UNASSIGNED: The UK Biobank was used to extract dietary factors that were used as exposures, including intake of alcohol, non-oily fish, beef, fresh fruit, oily fish, salad/raw vegetables, dried fruit, coffee, cereal, salt, tea, water, cooked vegetables, cheese, Lamb/mutton, pork, poultry, processed meat, and bread. The FinnGen biobank was used to obtain GWAS data on hernias as outcomes. The main analysis of this study was performed using the weighted median, MR-Egger, and IVW methods. Cochran\'s Q test was utilized to assess heterogeneity. To find potential outliers, the MR-PRESSO method was used. Leave-one-out analysis was employed to assess the IVW method\'s robustness.
    UNASSIGNED: Alcoholic consumption per week (OR: 0.614; p = 0.00614) reduced the risk of inguinal hernia. Alcohol intake frequency (OR: 1.309; p = 0.0477) increased the risk of ventral hernia (mainly including incisional hernia and parastomal hernia). The intake of non-oily fish (OR: 2.945; p = 0.0214) increased the risk of inguinal hernia. Salt added to food (OR: 1.841; p = 0.00267) increased the risk of umbilical hernia. Cheese intake (OR: 0.434; p = 0.000536) and dried fruit intake (OR: 0.322; p = 0.00716) decreased the risk of ventral hernia, while cooked vegetable intake (OR: 4.475; p = 0.0380) increased the risk of ventral hernia. No causal relationships were found with hernias from other dietary factors.
    UNASSIGNED: Inguinal, umbilical, and ventral hernias are all related to dietary factors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    用不可吸收的网状物修复腹壁切口疝是普外科中最常见的手术之一。网状物迁移到肠道是罕见的,但严重的并发症。它可以在手术后数月甚至数年发生,并且经常表现为模糊的腹痛,让诊断变得棘手.
    方法:我们报告了一例罕见的病例,一例52岁的女性出现小肠梗阻,继发于网状物从腹壁迁移到肠道,腹侧切口疝反复手术修复10年后。在手术中,一个网眼被迁移到一个小碗里。患者进行了小肠切除术。术后病程简单,5天后出院。
    方法:带网片的切口疝修补术是全世界最常用的外科手术之一。许多并发症与网状物的使用有关;其中最常见的是血清肿,血肿,和感染。网状物迁移在切口疝修补术后仍然是一个罕见的事件,当考虑在肠腔内完全迁移时,甚至更罕见。这种并发症的确切原因仍然未知。对于网格迁移已经提出了多种假设。腹痛,间歇性或持续性肠梗阻,质量形成,内脏穿孔是最常见的临床表现。建议通过腹腔镜或剖腹手术完全去除网孔,以及器官的部分或全部切除。
    结论:在切口疝网片修补术的情况下,网片迁移是一种罕见的并发症,通常需要手术干预。
    UNASSIGNED: Repairing incisional abdominal wall hernia with nonabsorbable meshes is one of the most common procedures in general surgery. Mesh migration into the intestine is rare but a serious complication. It can occur months or even years after surgery and often presents with vague abdominal pain, making diagnosis tricky.
    METHODS: We report a rare case of a 52-year-old female presenting a small bowel obstruction secondary to mesh migration from the abdominal wall into the intestine, 10 years after repeated surgical repair of a ventral incisional hernia. At surgery, a mesh was migrated into a small bowl. The patient had a small bowel resection. The postoperative course was simple and the patient was discharged after 5 days.
    METHODS: Incisional hernia repair with mesh is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures worldwide. Many complications have been linked to the use of mesh; among the most frequently reported are seromas, hematomas, and infections. Mesh migration remains an uncommon event after incisional hernia repair, and even rarer when considering complete migration within the intestinal lumen. The exact cause of this complication remains unknown. Multiple hypotheses have been proposed for mesh migration. Abdominal pain, intermittent or persistent intestinal obstruction, mass formation, and viscus perforation represent the most common clinical manifestation. Total removal of the mesh via laparoscopy or laparotomy is recommended, along with either partial or entire resection of the organ.
    CONCLUSIONS: Mesh migration is a an uncommon possible complication in case of incisional hernia mesh repair and it requires often surgical intervention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:通过分离腹壁,腹横肌释放(TAR)允许重建腹壁并放置大网孔,以治疗许多类型的疝。然而,在临界情况下,层的流动性不足,和额外的桥接技术可能需要无张力闭合。我们现在提供这方面的数据。患者和方法:2023年,作为疝修补术的一部分,我们对50例患者进行了腹横肌松解术。该程序是使用开放式(n=25)进行的,机器人(n=24),和腹腔镜(n=1)技术。疝囊总是整合到前缝线中,在内侧疝的情况下,用于lineaalba重建。结果:对于内侧疝,22例进行了开放性TAR。在这些病例中,有7例进行了额外的后路桥接。在没有桥接的患者中,TAR平面中的网孔尺寸与缺损面积(中位数,厘米)的比率为1200cm2/177cm2=6.8,和1750cm2/452cm2=3.8的那些桥接。手术时间(以分钟为中位数)为139和222分钟,住院时间为6和10天,分别。机器人TAR主要用于外侧和造口旁疝。这些手术的中位数为143和242分钟,住院时间是2天和3天,分别。对于机器人修复,3例进行后路桥接。讨论:使用TAR技术,即使是复杂的疝气也可以安全修复。额外的后部桥接提供了后部平面与肠的可靠分离。因此,疝囊始终可用于白线的前部重建。该技术可以实施为开放式或微创手术。
    Background: By separating the abdominal wall, transversus abdominis release (TAR) permits reconstruction of the abdominal wall and the placement of large mesh for many types of hernias. However, in borderline cases, the mobility of the layers is inadequate, and additional bridging techniques may be required for tension-free closure. We now present our own data in this regard. Patients and Methods: In 2023, we performed transversus abdominis release on 50 patients as part of hernia repair. The procedures were carried out using open (n = 25), robotic (n = 24), and laparoscopic (n = 1) techniques. The hernia sac was always integrated into the anterior suture and, in the case of medial hernias, was used for linea alba reconstruction. Results: For medial hernias, open TAR was performed in 22 cases. Additional posterior bridging was performed in 7 of these cases. The ratio of mesh size in the TAR plane to the defect area (median in cm) was 1200cm2/177 cm2 = 6.8 in patients without bridging, and 1750cm2/452 cm2 = 3.8 in those with bridging. The duration of surgery (median in min) was 139 and 222 min and the hospital stay was 6 and 10 days, respectively. Robotic TAR was performed predominantly for lateral and parastomal hernias. These procedures took a median of 143 and 242 min, and the hospital stay was 2 and 3 days, respectively. For robotic repair, posterior bridging was performed in 3 cases. Discussion: Using the TAR technique, even complex hernias can be safely repaired. Additional posterior bridging provides a reliable separation of the posterior plane from the intestines. Therefore, the hernia sac is always available for anterior reconstruction of the linea alba. The technique can be implemented as an open or minimally invasive procedure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号