illness

疾病
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    脓毒症占全球可预防死亡的很大比例,早期治疗已被发现是降低死亡率的主要因素。在急救环境中早期识别败血症至关重要,因为这将缩短住院时间以及抗生素治疗和初始复苏的时间。我们的目的是探索与评估怀疑患有急性感染的成年人的急救提供者对败血症的认识或对败血症的认识有关的现有文献。我们的范围审查是作为国际复苏联络委员会(ILCOR)连续证据评估过程的一部分进行的,以更新2024ILCOR科学共识和治疗建议。我们搜查了Embase,Medline,和Cochrane数据库从成立到2023年1月17日,在2023年11月21日和2023年12月2日进行了更新搜索。灰色文献检索于2023年8月29日进行。人群包括患有急性疾病的成年人,表现出严重感染的体征和症状。结果包括败血症识别或外行急救提供者对败血症的认识。在审查了4380个潜在来源后,四项审查(三项系统审查和一项范围审查),11项观察性研究,27个网站符合纳入标准。没有研究直接针对我们的PICOST(人口,干预,比较器,结果,研究设计,和时间框架)问题,因为在急救设置中没有执行任何操作。3项系统评价和9项观察性研究评估早期预警评分检测脓毒症和预测脓毒症继发不良结局的能力,结果不一致。但许多人发现筛选工具是有用的。一项范围审查和一项观察性研究发现,公众对败血症的知识和认识是可变的,并且取决于医疗保健工作。location,教育水平,种族,性别,和年龄。灰色文献来源列出的与败血症相关的体征和症状主要属于九个一般类别,作为教育公众认识败血症的一种手段。尽管这次范围界定审查没有发现任何直接解决我们结果的研究,它强调了未来研究需要更好地了解急救环境中脓毒症的认识.
    Sepsis accounts for a significant proportion of preventable deaths worldwide and early treatment has been found to be a mainstay of decreasing mortality. Early identification of sepsis in the first-aid setting is critical as this results in a shorter time to hospital presentation and management with antibiotics and initial resuscitation. Our aim was to explore the existing literature related to either sepsis recognition or awareness of sepsis by first-aid providers who are evaluating an adult suspected of an acute infection. Our scoping review was performed as part of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation\'s (ILCOR) continuous evidence evaluation process to update the 2024 ILCOR Consensus on Science with Treatment Recommendations. We searched Embase, Medline, and Cochrane databases from their inception to January 17, 2023, with updated searches performed on November 21, 2023, and December 2, 2023. The gray literature search was conducted on August 29, 2023. The population included adults presenting with an acute illness exhibiting signs and symptoms of a severe infection. Outcomes included sepsis recognition or awareness of sepsis by a lay first-aid provider. After reviewing 4380 potential sources, four reviews (three systematic reviews and one scoping review), 11 observational studies, and 27 websites met the inclusion criteria. No study directly addressed our PICOST (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes, Study Design, and Timeframe) question as none were performed in the first-aid setting. Three systematic reviews and nine observational studies that assessed the ability of early warning scores to detect sepsis and predict adverse outcomes secondary to sepsis had inconsistent results, but many found the screening tools to be useful. One scoping review and one observational study found public knowledge and awareness of sepsis to be variable and dependent upon healthcare employment, location, education level, ethnicity, sex, and age. Signs and symptoms associated with sepsis as listed by gray literature sources fell primarily under nine general categories as a means of educating the public on sepsis recognition. Although this scoping review did not identify any studies that directly addressed our outcomes, it highlights the need for future research to better understand the recognition of sepsis in first-aid settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    奥运会跳水运动涉及3米跳板和10米跳台的竞技学科。尽管人们普遍认为腰椎损伤在跳水运动员中很常见,关于跳水运动员健康问题的现有文献仍然很少。
    为了确定发病率,患病率,以及竞技跳水运动员出现的健康问题。
    Medline,EMBASE,SportsDiscus,PsycINFO,谷歌学者。
    用英语撰写的研究调查精英或前精英竞技跳水(跳板,平台)受伤和/或疾病符合资格。两名独立审稿人按标题筛选列入名单,abstract,和全文符合资格标准。
    系统评价。
    4级。
    数据提取由1位作者使用结构化表格完成。然后,第二作者独立审查并验证了提取的数据,任何差异都通过协商一致解决。
    搜索确定了2554篇潜在文章,28项研究符合资格标准。大多数研究的监视设置仅限于基于竞争的事件,报告的伤害发生率从2.1%到22.2%不等。报告的伤害发生率为每1000名运动员暴露1.9至15.5。肩膀受伤,下背部/腰椎,树干,和手腕/手的报告频率最高。据报道,腰背痛的患病率高达89%(终生),43.1%(期间),和37.3%(分)。发病率从0.0%到22.2%不等,呼吸道和胃肠道疾病报告最频繁。
    在比赛期间,每5名跳水运动员中就有1人受伤和/或生病。观察到报告偏差,大多数队列研究将监测限制在基于竞争的短时间段内。这将目前对跳水运动员所经历的健康问题的理解限制在比赛期间,并且需要扩大到全年监测。
    UNASSIGNED: The Olympic sport of diving involves the competitive disciplines of 3 m springboard and 10 m platform. Although it is generally accepted that lumbar spine injuries are common in diving athletes, the existing literature of health problems in diving athletes remains scarce.
    UNASSIGNED: To identify the incidence, prevalence, and type of health problems that occur in competitive diving athletes.
    UNASSIGNED: Medline, EMBASE, SportsDiscus, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar.
    UNASSIGNED: Studies written in English investigating elite or pre-elite competitive diving (springboard, platform) injuries and/or illnesses were eligible. Two independent reviewers screened for inclusion by title, abstract, and full text in accordance with the eligibility criteria.
    UNASSIGNED: Systematic review.
    UNASSIGNED: Level 4.
    UNASSIGNED: Data extraction was completed by 1 author using a structured form. A second author then independently reviewed and verified the extracted data, any discrepancies were resolved through consensus.
    UNASSIGNED: The search identified 2554 potential articles, with 28 studies meeting eligibility criteria. The surveillance setting of most studies was restricted to competition-based events, with the reported injury incidence proportion ranging from 2.1% to 22.2%. The reported injury incidence rate ranged from 1.9 to 15.5 per 1000 athlete-exposures. Injuries to the shoulder, lower back/lumbar spine, trunk, and wrist/hand were reported most frequently. The prevalence of low back pain was reported as high as 89% (lifetime), 43.1% (period), and 37.3% (point). The illness incidence proportion ranged from 0.0% to 22.2%, with respiratory and gastrointestinal illness reported most frequently.
    UNASSIGNED: Up to 1 in 5 diving athletes sustain an injury and/or illness during periods of competition. A reporting bias was observed, with most cohort studies limiting surveillance to short competition-based periods only. This limits the current understanding of the health problems experienced by diving athletes to competition periods only and requires expansion to whole-of-year surveillance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这篇叙述性综述评估了自动胰岛素输送(AID)系统在儿科人群中管理1型糖尿病(PWD)患者中的使用。它概述了当前的研究,目前市场上各种AID系统之间的差异和面临的挑战,并讨论了该领域进一步发展的潜在机会。此外,叙述性综述包括各种专家意见,内容涉及在胰岛素需求快速变化的挑战中如何使用不同的AID系统.这些包括例子,例如在胰岛素需求增加或减少的疾病期间以及在不同强度或持续时间的身体活动期间。案例描述给出了根据所使用的AID系统类型添加用户启动操作的场景示例。作者还讨论了在这些情况下如何使用另一个AID系统。
    This narrative review assesses the use of automated insulin delivery (AID) systems in managing persons with type 1 diabetes (PWD) in the pediatric population. It outlines current research, the differences between various AID systems currently on the market and the challenges faced, and discusses potential opportunities for further advancements within this field. Furthermore, the narrative review includes various expert opinions on how different AID systems can be used in the event of challenges with rapidly changing insulin requirements. These include examples, such as during illness with increased or decreased insulin requirements and during physical activity of different intensities or durations. Case descriptions give examples of scenarios with added user-initiated actions depending on the type of AID system used. The authors also discuss how another AID system could have been used in these situations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心理学家在临终关怀中的代表性仍然不足,医疗保健专业人员对他们的角色了解有限,病人,和照顾者。这篇系统的混合研究综述,预期在PROSPERO注册(CRD42020215775),探索心理学家的角色,以及他们所经历的促进者和障碍,支持与疾病相关的死亡和死亡的客户。2023年10月对六个研究数据库进行了搜索。51项研究,主要是定性的,从心理学家的角度来看,符合纳入标准。专题综合强调了心理学家如何在各种情况下提供专业知识。他们支持客户为死亡做准备,适应死亡,提供专业咨询和支持,并在加强临终心理护理方面发挥领导作用。结果说明了在临终关怀中工作的持续因素和持续挑战,即,导航死亡空间的独特性质,对心理学家贡献的认可和认识,和支持,需要培训和发展。鉴于死亡和死亡的普遍性,这篇综述与心理学家在更传统的临终关怀背景下工作有关,例如员工援助计划,私人执业,学校,和其他心理服务。政策,讨论了临床和研究意义,包括需要更多的参与和培训心理学家在死亡和死亡空间。
    Psychologists remain underrepresented in end-of-life care, and there is limited understanding of their role among healthcare professionals, patients, and caregivers. This systematic mixed-studies review, prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020215775), explored the role of psychologists, and the facilitators and barriers they experience, in supporting clients with illness-related dying and death. A search of six research databases was conducted in October 2023. Fifty-one studies, mainly qualitative and from the perspectives of psychologists, met inclusion criteria. Thematic synthesis highlighted how psychologists provided expertise across various contexts. They supported clients with preparing for death, and adjusting to dying, provided professional consultancy and support, and undertook leadership in enhancing psychological end-of-life care. Results illustrated the sustaining factors and ongoing challenges working in end-of-life care, namely, the unique nature of navigating the death space, recognition and awareness of psychologists\' contribution, and the support, training and development required. Given the universality of dying and death, this review is relevant to psychologists working within and beyond more traditional end-of-life care contexts, such as employee assistance programs, private practice, schools, and other psychological services. Policy, clinical and research implications are discussed, including the need for greater engagement and training of psychologists in the dying and death space.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:提供迄今为止发布的用于估算运动相关伤害成本的方法的概述,并强调未来研究的考虑因素和机会。
    方法:范围审查。
    方法:Scopus,从2000年1月1日至2023年1月1日搜索了MEDLINE和CINHAL。研究由两名独立的审阅者进行筛选,如果他们报告了与运动相关的伤害的成本分析或成本估算,则符合资格。
    结果:31项研究符合纳入标准。自2014年以来,发表了27项研究(87%)。成本类型包括直接医疗成本(12项研究),间接成本(10项研究)和两者的组合(9项研究)。21项研究(68%)使用自下而上的成本计算方法来衡量运动损伤的成本,并根据卫生系统的服务费率或收费表估算直接成本,医院,保险公司或国家保险委员会。在七项研究(23%)中使用了自上而下的方法,使用来自公开资源的数据估算了时间损失伤害的间接工资成本。十项研究是从体育组织的成本角度进行的(32%)。缺乏对所使用的成本计算方法和承担成本的人的观点的明确报告。
    结论:估计运动损伤的成本是一个新兴的研究领域,随着近年来出版物的增加。然而,仍然缺乏提供信息或评估这些研究的方法学指导。建议扩展已建立的疾病费用清单,并提供运动损伤解释,以指导未来的运动损伤研究费用。
    OBJECTIVE: Provide an overview of the methods used to estimate the cost of sports-related injury published to date, and to highlight considerations and opportunities for future research.
    METHODS: Scoping review.
    METHODS: Scopus, MEDLINE and CINHAL were searched from 1st January 2000 to 1st January 2023. Studies were screened by two independent reviewers and were eligible if they reported on a cost analysis or cost estimation of sports related injury.
    RESULTS: Thirty-one studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Twenty-seven studies (87 %) were published since 2014. The type of costs included direct healthcare costs (12 studies), indirect costs (10 studies) and a combination of both (9 studies). Twenty-one studies (68 %) used a bottom-up costing approach to measure costs of sports injury and estimated direct costs from the service rates or fee schedules of health systems, hospital, insurance companies or national insurance boards. A top-down approach was used in seven studies (23 %) to estimate the indirect salary cost of time-loss injuries using data from publicly available resources. Ten studies were from the cost perspective of a sporting organisation (32 %). There was a lack of explicit reporting of the costing method used and the perspective of those bearing the costs.
    CONCLUSIONS: Estimating the cost of sports injuries is an emerging area of research, with publications increasing in recent years. However, there remains a lack of methodological guidance to inform or appraise these studies. The expansion of established cost of illness checklists with sport injury explanations to guide future cost of sports injury studies is recommended.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:儿童在身体不适时上学,被称为基于学校的出勤主义,对教育和身心健康产生负面影响。我们旨在确定这种行为的风险因素。
    方法:我们使用与学校相关的单词(例如,学校和儿童保育)和出勤(例如,出勤和病假)。这些研究是根据与基于学校的出勤相关的风险因素进行综合的,并按相关主题分为主题。
    结果:我们的综述包括18项研究,定量的,定性,和混合方法研究设计。孩子们,父母,学校工作人员报告了过去的事件和未来出勤的意图。我们从这些报告中确定了五个主题:对疾病/体征和症状的看法;儿童的特征;儿童和父母对学校的动机和态度;组织因素;和学校疾病政策。以学校为基础的出现的风险增加通常与严重程度低和无法识别的症状有关,有高中缺席记录的孩子,不相信儿童的疾病,不支持的雇主,模糊的学校政策和财务后果。
    结论:由于涉及多个个体的相互竞争的利益,以学校为基础的出勤率很复杂,比如孩子,父母,和学校工作人员。疾病政策需要包括关于疾病以及疾病的体征和症状的明确和具体的指导,并应传达给所有相关个人,以减轻政策解释方式的差异。此外,家长和学校工作人员需要支持,比如财务和儿童保育,能够在孩子身体不适的时候管理他们。
    BACKGROUND: Children attending school whilst unwell, known as school-based presenteeism, results in negative impacts on education and mental and physical health. We aimed to identify the risk factors for this behaviour.
    METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of five databases (11 July 2022) using words associated with school (e.g., school and childcare) and presenteeism (e.g., presenteeism and sick leave). The studies are synthesised according to the risk factors associated with school-based presenteeism and are grouped into themes by related topics.
    RESULTS: Our review included 18 studies, with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method study designs. Children, parents, and school staff reported past incidents and intentions for future presenteeism. We identified five themes from these reports: perceptions about the illness / signs and symptom(s); children\'s characteristics; children\'s and parents\' motivations and attitudes towards school; organisational factors; and school sickness policy. Increased risk of school-based presenteeism was commonly linked to symptoms that were perceived low in severity and unidentifiable, children with a high school absence record, disbelief in children\'s illness, unsupportive employers, vague school policies and financial consequences.
    CONCLUSIONS: School-based presenteeism is complex due to the competing interests of the multiple individuals involved, such as children, parents, and school staff. Sickness policies need to include clear and specific guidance about illness and the signs and symptoms of diseases and should be communicated to all relevant individuals to mitigate against discrepancies in how the policy is interpreted. Furthermore, parents and school staff need support, such as financial and childcare, to be able to manage children when they are unwell.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    背景:75%的精神疾病患者在12-24岁之间发病。这个年龄段的许多人报告说,在接受以青年为中心的优质精神保健服务方面存在重大障碍。随着科技的飞速发展,以及最近的COVID-19大流行,移动健康(mHealth)为青年心理健康研究提供了新的机会,实践,和政策。
    目的:研究目标是:1)综合当前证据,支持针对经历心理健康挑战的青年的mHealth干预措施;2)确定mHealth领域与青年心理健康服务获取和健康结果相关的当前差距。
    方法:以Arksey和O\'Malley的方法为指导,我们对使用mHealth工具改善青少年心理健康的同行评审研究进行了范围审查(2016年1月-2022年2月).使用MEDLINE,PubMed,PsycINFO,和Embase数据库,我们使用以下关键术语进行搜索:1)mHealth;2)青年和年轻人;3)心理健康。使用内容分析法分析了当前的差距。
    结果:搜索产生了4270条记录,其中151人符合纳入标准。纳入的文章强调了青年mHealth干预资源分配的全面方面,m健康交付方法,测量工具,mHealth干预评估,青年参与所有研究参与者的平均年龄为17岁(Q1:14;Q3:21)。只有三项研究(2%)涉及在二元期权之外报告自己的性别或性别的参与者。许多研究(n=68,45%)是在COVID-19爆发后发表的。研究类型和设计多种多样,其中60项(40%)被确定为随机对照试验(RCTs)。值得注意的是,151项研究中有143项(95%)来自发达国家,这表明在资源较低的环境中实施移动医疗服务的可行性存在证据不足。此外,结果突出了与薄弱的研究设计有关的担忧,专家参与以及为捕捉影响或随时间变化而选择的成果衡量标准类型。还缺乏为青年研究mHealth技术以及使用非青年为中心的方法来实施成果的标准化法规和准则。
    结论:这项研究可用于指导未来的工作,以及开发以青年为中心的移动健康工具,这些工具可以随着时间的推移为不同类型的青年实施和维持。需要优先考虑青年参与的实施科学研究,以增进对mHealth实施的当前理解。同样,核心成果集可能支持以青年为中心的衡量战略,以系统的方式捕捉成果,优先考虑公平,多样性,inclusion,和强大的测量科学。最后,这项研究表明,需要未来的实践和政策研究,以确保mHealth的风险最小化,并且这种创新的医疗保健服务随着时间的推移正在满足年轻人的新需求。
    背景:
    A total of 75% of people with mental health disorders have an onset of illness between the ages of 12 and 24 years. Many in this age group report substantial obstacles to receiving quality youth-centered mental health care services. With the rapid development of technology and the recent COVID-19 pandemic, mobile health (mHealth) has presented new opportunities for youth mental health research, practice, and policy.
    The research objectives were to (1) synthesize the current evidence supporting mHealth interventions for youths who experience mental health challenges and (2) identify current gaps in the mHealth field related to youth\'s access to mental health services and health outcomes.
    Guided by the methods of Arksey and O\'Malley, we conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed studies that used mHealth tools to improve youth mental health (January 2016-February 2022). We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO, and Embase databases using the following key terms: (1) mHealth; (2) youth and young adults; and (3) mental health. The current gaps were analyzed using content analysis.
    The search produced 4270 records, of which 151 met inclusion criteria. Included articles highlight the comprehensive aspects of youth mHealth intervention resource allocation for targeted conditions, mHealth delivery methods, measurement tools, evaluation of mHealth intervention, and youth engagement. The median age for participants in all studies is 17 (IQR 14-21) years. Only 3 (2%) studies involved participants who reported their sex or gender outside of the binary option. Many studies (68/151, 45%) were published after the onset of the COVID-19 outbreak. Study types and designs varied, with 60 (40%) identified as randomized controlled trials. Notably, 143 out of 151 (95%) studies came from developed countries, suggesting an evidence shortfall on the feasibility of implementing mHealth services in lower-resourced settings. Additionally, the results highlight concerns related to inadequate resources devoted to self-harm and substance uses, weak study design, expert engagement, and the variety of outcome measures selected to capture impact or changes over time. There is also a lack of standardized regulations and guidelines for researching mHealth technologies for youths and the use of non-youth-centered approaches to implementing results.
    This study may be used to inform future work as well as the development of youth-centered mHealth tools that can be implemented and sustained over time for diverse types of youths. Implementation science research that prioritizes youths\' engagement is needed to advance the current understanding of mHealth implementation. Moreover, core outcome sets may support a youth-centered measurement strategy to capture outcomes in a systematic way that prioritizes equity, diversity, inclusion, and robust measurement science. Finally, this study suggests that future practice and policy research are needed to ensure the risk of mHealth is minimized and that this innovative health care service is meeting the emerging needs of youths over time.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了综合住院康复治疗成分(与任何比较)对功能的有效性的证据,生活质量,逗留时间,排放目的地,以及意外入院的老年人死亡率。
    对Cochrane图书馆的系统搜索,MEDLINE,Embase,PsychInfo,PEDro,BASE,和OpenGrey,对从数据库开始到2020年12月的计划外入院后老年人住院康复干预措施进行了已发表和未发表的系统评价。资格重复筛选,质量评估,和数据提取,包括使用治疗理论框架提取治疗成分及其各自的成分。随机效应荟萃分析完成总体和治疗成分。用不一致性值(I2)评估统计异质性。
    中低质量的系统评价(n=12),纳入44个非重叠相关随机对照试验.当纳入康复干预时,耐力锻炼有很大的效果,住院后步行耐力的早期干预和塑造知识与比较。早期干预,反复实践活动,目标和规划,与比较相比,增加的医疗护理和/或出院计划增加了出院回家的可能性.日常生活活动(ADL)的证据相互矛盾。康复干预措施对功能流动性无效,力量,或生活质量,或减少住院时间或死亡率。因此,我们没有探讨治疗成分对这些结局的潜在作用.
    观察到的益处通常适用于老年人群的亚组,例如,耐力运动对患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病的老年人的耐力有效,早期干预对髋部骨折患者的耐力有效。未来的研究应该确定是否在亚组中观察到这些治疗成分的有效性,更广泛地适用于老年人。需要根据已建立的框架更透明地报告干预组成部分和成分,以实现未来的合成和/或复制。
    PROSPERO注册CRD42018114323。
    To synthesise the evidence for the effectiveness of inpatient rehabilitation treatment ingredients (versus any comparison) on functioning, quality of life, length of stay, discharge destination, and mortality among older adults with an unplanned hospital admission.
    A systematic search of Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, PsychInfo, PEDro, BASE, and OpenGrey for published and unpublished systematic reviews of inpatient rehabilitation interventions for older adults following an unplanned admission to hospital from database inception to December 2020. Duplicate screening for eligibility, quality assessment, and data extraction including extraction of treatment components and their respective ingredients employing the Treatment Theory framework. Random effects meta-analyses were completed overall and by treatment ingredient. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed with the inconsistency-value (I2).
    Systematic reviews (n = 12) of moderate to low quality, including 44 non-overlapping relevant RCTs were included. When incorporated in a rehabilitation intervention, there was a large effect of endurance exercise, early intervention and shaping knowledge on walking endurance after the inpatient stay versus comparison. Early intervention, repeated practice activities, goals and planning, increased medical care and/or discharge planning increased the likelihood of discharge home versus comparison. The evidence for activities of daily living (ADL) was conflicting. Rehabilitation interventions were not effective for functional mobility, strength, or quality of life, or reduce length of stay or mortality. Therefore, we did not explore the potential role of treatment ingredients for these outcomes.
    Benefits observed were often for subgroups of the older adult population e.g., endurance exercise was effective for endurance in older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and early intervention was effective for endurance for those with hip fracture. Future research should determine whether the effectiveness of these treatment ingredients observed in subgroups, are generalisable to older adults more broadly. There is a need for more transparent reporting of intervention components and ingredients according to established frameworks to enable future synthesis and/or replication.
    PROSPERO Registration CRD42018114323 .
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    BACKGROUND: Cycling is a popular global sport and method of transportation and a significant contributor to admissions to hospital emergency units following an injury. Mountain biking events present additional challenges with remote venues and isolated courses, for which on-site medical care is often provided, for both injury and illness occurring during races. National health data may not represent these unique events, and specific data on incidence of injury and illness in mountain biking events are essential. Therefore, the aim of this study was to review the available injury and illness literature, reporting methods and risk factors in cross-country mountain biking.
    METHODS: Search engines PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Scopus, PEDro and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched, and a grey literature search was performed. Narrative analyses of the types, severity and area of injuries and illness type and severity were performed as pooling of data was impossible due to insufficient high-quality studies with the same injury and illness definitions.
    RESULTS: Seven studies comprising 28,021 participants were included for analysis. Four to 71% of participants sustained an injury in a cross-country mountain bike event. Injuries to the skin were the most common, followed by bony injuries and concussion. Five to 47% of cyclists reported the onset of gastrointestinal symptoms post-event. The prevalence of illness during events ranged from 0.5 to 23.0%.
    CONCLUSIONS: The injury and illness definitions were varied and prevented clear comparisons between studies. Injury and illness present a concern in cross-country marathon mountain biking and should be investigated further to provide the true burden of these during race events. Registration: This protocol has been registered with PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews (No: CRD42019134586).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目标:为公路骑车人实施有效的伤害和疾病预防计划,我们想首先确定这群运动员的伤病负担。我们,因此,对公路自行车中所有报告的伤害/疾病进行了系统审查。
    方法:系统评价。
    方法:通过全面搜索:MEDLINE,Embase,PsycINFO,WebofScience和Cochrane图书馆从成立到2020年1月。
    方法:报告参加公路自行车运动的成年人受伤/患病的研究。自行车通勤研究被排除在分析之外。
    方法:两位综述作者独立筛选标题和摘要的资格和试验质量。初始搜索标准返回52个标题和摘要,需要审查,回顾全文后,纳入了12项研究。
    结果:最常见的损伤是擦伤,撕裂和血肿占记录的总损伤的40-60%。骨折(6-15%)是第二常见的损伤类型。头部损伤(包括脑震荡)占肌肉肌腱损伤的5-15%,占2-17.5%。上肢受损伤的频率高于下肢,业余爱好者似乎比专业人士更容易受伤/生病。锁骨是普遍的骨折,髌股综合征是头号过度诊断。由于报告方法不一致,未对结果进行荟萃分析。
    结论:这是第一个关于公路自行车损伤的系统综述。损伤最常影响上肢,锁骨是最常见的骨折,最常见的过度使用损伤是髌股综合征。
    OBJECTIVE: To allow the implementation of effective injury and illness prevention programmes for road cyclists, we wanted to first identify the injury/illness burden to this group of athletes. We, therefore, undertook a systematic review of all reported injuries/illness in road cycling.
    METHODS: Systematic review.
    METHODS: Identification of articles was achieved through a comprehensive search of: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science and Cochrane Library from inception until January 2020.
    METHODS: Studies reporting injuries/illness in adults participating in road cycling. Cycling commuter studies were excluded from the analysis.
    METHODS: Two review authors independently screened titles and abstracts for eligibility and trial quality. Initial search criteria returned 52 titles and abstracts to be reviewed, with 12 studies included after reviewing the full text articles.
    RESULTS: The most common injuries sustained were abrasions, lacerations and haematomas accounting for 40-60% of the total injuries recorded. Fractures (6-15%) were the second most frequent type of injury. Head injuries (including concussions) accounted for 5-15% of injuries with musculotendinous injuries accounting for 2-17.5%. The upper limb was more frequently affected by injuries than the lower limb, with amateurs appearing to be at higher risk of injury/illness than professionals. Clavicle was the prevalent fracture, with patellofemoral syndrome the number one overuse diagnosis. No meta-analysis of the results was undertaken due to the inconsistent methods of reporting.
    CONCLUSIONS: This is the first systematic review of road cycling injuries. Injuries most often affected the upper limb, with clavicle being the most prevalent fracture and the most common overuse injury being patellofemoral syndrome.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号