BACKGROUND: Spinopelvic stiffness (primarily in the sagittal plane) has been identified as a factor associated with inferior patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and increased dislocation risk after THA. Incorporating preoperative spinopelvic characteristics into surgical planning has been suggested to determine a patient-specific cup orientation that minimizes dislocation risk. Sagittal plane radiographic analysis of static postures indicates that patients exhibit a degree of normalization in their spinopelvic characteristics after THA. It is not yet known whether normalization is also evident during dynamic movement patterns, nor whether it occurs in the coronal and axial planes as well.
OBJECTIVE: (1) Does motion capture analysis of sagittal spinopelvic motion provide evidence of normalization after THA? (2) Do changes in coronal and axial plane motion accompany those in the sagittal plane?
METHODS: Between April 2019 and February 2020, 25 patients agreed to undergo motion capture movement analysis before THA for the treatment of hip osteoarthritis (OA). Of those, 20 underwent the same assessment between 8 and 31 months after THA. Five patients were excluded because of revision surgery (n = 1), contralateral hip OA (n = 1), and technical issues with a force plate during post-THA assessment (n = 3), leaving a cohort total of 15 (median age [IQR] 65 years [10]; seven male and eight female patients). A convenience sample of nine asymptomatic volunteers, who were free of hip and spinal pathology, was also assessed (median age 51 years [34]; four male and five female patients). Although the patients in the control group were younger than those in the patient group, this set a high bar for our threshold of spinopelvic normalization, reducing the possibility of false positive results. Three-dimensional motion capture was performed to measure spinal, pelvic, and hip motion while participants completed three tasks: seated bend and reach, seated trunk rotation, and gait on a level surface. ROM during each task was assessed and compared between pre- and post-THA conditions and between patients and controls. Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) was used to assess the timing of differences in motion during gait, and spatiotemporal gait parameters were also measured.
RESULTS: After THA, patients demonstrated improvements in sagittal spinal (median [IQR] 32° [18°] versus 41° [14°]; difference of medians 9°; p = 0.004), pelvis (25° [21°] versus 30° [8°]; difference of medians 5°; p = 0.02), and hip ROM (21° [18°] versus 27° [10°]; difference of medians 6°; p = 0.02) during seated bend and reach as well in sagittal hip ROM during gait (30° [11°] versus 44° [7°]; difference of medians 14°; p < 0.001) compared with their pre-THA results, and they showed a high degree of normalization overall. These sagittal plane changes were accompanied by post-THA increases in coronal hip ROM (12° [9°] versus 18° [8°]; difference of medians 6°; p = 0.01) during seated trunk rotation, by both coronal (6° [4°] versus 9° [3°]; difference of medians 3°; p = 0.01) and axial (10° [8°] versus 16° [7°]; difference of medians 6°; p = 0.003) spinal ROM, as well as coronal (8° [3°] versus 13° [4°]; difference of medians 5°; p < 0.001) and axial hip ROM (21° [11°] versus 34° [24°]; difference of medians 13°; p = 0.01) during gait compared with before THA. The SPM analysis showed these improvements occurred during the late swing and early stance phases of gait.
CONCLUSIONS: When restricted preoperatively, spinopelvic characteristics during daily tasks show normalization after THA, concurring with previous radiographic findings in the sagittal plane. Thus, spinopelvic characteristics change dynamically, and incorporating them into surgical planning would require predictive models on post-THA improvements to be of use.
METHODS: Level II, prognostic study.

Hip pain is a prevalent degenerative joint symptoms, imposing a significant global health burden. Hip pain is experiencing an increase in incidences in Korea due to its aging society, and the social burden of hip pain continues to rise as the hip joint is crucial for gait and balance. This study assessed the epidemiology of hip pain in Korea using data from the fifth version of Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES V-5). The research analyzed data from 8,898,044 Koreans to evaluate the prevalence and characteristics of hip pain and abnormal hip X-ray. Variables encompassed medical, demographic, mental, social, and musculoskeletal factors. Descriptive analysis and propensity score matching analyses unveiled characteristics of Koreans experiencing hip pain or showing abnormal hip x-ray. The study provides insights into the epidemiology of hip pain in the entire Korean population, and further suggesting the effective management of hip pain.

BACKGROUND: Hypomobility syndrome (HMS), or limited hip range of motion (ROM), is often reported in adolescents who train heavily. This study was aimed to investigate the impact of traditional static stretching (STR) and self-myofascial release (MFR) in adolescents with HMS hip.
METHODS: This study was a randomized controlled trial. Adolescent athletes with HMS hip were grouped as 23 STR and 23 MFR. Foam rolling was employed as the training method for MFR. Both interventions were performed twice a day for 20 minutes in 6 weeks. The training was filmed and distributed via the mobile video. Self-assessed Copenhagen Hip & Groin Outcome Score, ROM, strength, and hop tests were measured before and after the interventions. The healthy side without limitations was designated as non-HMS (nHMS) and taken as reference value.
RESULTS: The study participants had limitations in flexion (FLX), abduction (ABD), internal rotation (IR), and external rotation (ER). The ROM of STR group was recovered to nHMS level. The FLX and ABD of MFR group was also recovered, however the IR and ER had lower angles compared to nHMS. MFR FLX, ABD, ER strength, and single hop test were restored like that of nHMS, however STR group was substantially lower than nHMS despite the improvements. Both groups depicted lower pre-intervention Copenhagen Hip & Groin Outcome Score subscale activities daily living, sport, and physical activity compared to nHMS. Activities daily living and physical activity were improved to healthy levels after the intervention, however sport was lower than that of nHMS.
CONCLUSIONS: Both STR and MFR had impact on hip mobility and hip self-assessment score. Furthermore, MFR had strength improvements in FLX, ABD, and ER. However, the improvements in MFR group regarding triples, crossover hops, and self-assessed sports were limited. Therefore, STR and MFR are effective in improving not only ROM but also muscle function asymmetry in HMS hip.

Physical therapy and orthopaedic surgery are two common treatments for non-arthritic hip pain. Interdisciplinary evaluation across these disciplines may produce a more supportive treatment-planning process; however, the feasibility of such an evaluation remains unknown.
To assess the feasibility of an interdisciplinary evaluation with an orthopaedic surgeon and physical therapist for non-arthritic hip pain.
Observational feasibility study of a randomized controlled trial.
Participants were randomized to an interdisciplinary (surgeon + physical therapist) or standard (surgeon) evaluation in a hip preservation clinic. Recruitment rate was recorded. Retention rate was calculated for all variables of interest. Enrollment and refusal reasons were recorded as patient quotes and categorized by a single grader. Time spent in clinic was compared across groups using Mann Whitney U tests (P ≤ 0.05). Study clinicians were interviewed, and responses were categorized based on pre-determined themes.
Eighty-one percent of eligible patients enrolled over a 15-month recruitment period. Willingness(n = 16), urgency to resolve pain(n = 10), financial compensation(n = 1), interest in research(n = 42), physical therapy(n = 6), or multiple-provider care(n = 15) were participants\' enrollment reasons; reason was not recorded for 22 participants. Time(n = 11), preference for single-provider care(n = 6), current physical therapy treatment(n = 1), and disinterest in physical therapy(n = 7) or research(n = 2) were refusal reasons of patients who did not enroll. Retention for primary variables of interest was 100% in both groups. Participants spent, on average, 23.5 min more time in clinic for the interdisciplinary evaluation compared to the standard (P < 0.001).
An interdisciplinary evaluation for patients with non-arthritic hip pain that included a physical therapist and orthopaedic surgeon in a hip preservation clinic was feasible and may better inform the treatment planning process.

UNASSIGNED: Cam morphology develops during skeletal growth, but its influence on cartilage and the labrum in high-impact athletes later in life is unknown.
UNASSIGNED: To (1) explore the association between the presence and duration of cam morphology during adolescence and the cartilage and labral status 7 to 12 years later and (2) report the prevalence of cartilage loss and labral damage in a population of young male athletes (<32 years old) who played professional soccer during skeletal growth.
UNASSIGNED: Cohort study (Prognosis); Level of evidence, 2.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 89 healthy male academy soccer players from the Dutch soccer club Feyenoord (aged 12-19 years) were included at baseline. At baseline and 2.5- and 5-year follow-ups, standardized supine anteroposterior pelvis and frog-leg lateral radiographs of each hip were obtained. At 12-year follow-up, magnetic resonance imaging of both hips was performed. Cam morphology was defined by a validated alpha angle ≥60° on radiographs at baseline or 2.5- or 5-year follow-up when the growth plates were closed. Hips with the presence of cam morphology at baseline or at 2.5-year follow-up were classified as having a \"longer duration\" of cam morphology. Hips with cam morphology only present since 5-year follow-up were classified as having a \"shorter duration\" of cam morphology. At 12-year follow-up, cartilage loss and labral abnormalities were assessed semiquantitatively. Associations were estimated using logistic regression, adjusted for age and body mass index.
UNASSIGNED: Overall, 35 patients (70 hips) with a mean age of 28.0 ± 2.0 years and mean body mass index of 24.1 ± 1.8 participated at 12-year follow-up. Cam morphology was present in 56 of 70 hips (80%). The prevalence of cartilage loss was 52% in hips with cam morphology and 21% in hips without cam morphology (adjusted odds ratio, 4.52 [95% CI, 1.16-17.61]; P = .03). A labral abnormality was present in 77% of hips with cam morphology and in 64% of hips without cam morphology (adjusted odds ratio, 1.99 [95% CI, 0.59-6.73]; P = .27). The duration of cam morphology did not influence these associations.
UNASSIGNED: The development of cam morphology during skeletal growth was associated with future magnetic resonance imaging findings consistent with cartilage loss in young adults but not with labral abnormalities.

BACKGROUND: The prone hip extension test is used as a clinical tool to diagnose specific motor control impairments that have been identified in individuals with chronic low back pain. However, conventional protocols for performing the test are subjective and lack evidence for their effectiveness. The objective of the current study was to quantify lumbopelvic motion and muscle activation during this test and identify which motor control patterns best distinguish individuals with low back pain from asymptomatic controls.
METHODS: 18 individuals with sub-acute or chronic low back pain and 32 asymptomatic controls performed the prone hip extension test while a 3D motion capture system measured lumbar and pelvic movement patterns and an electromyography system measured the muscle activation patterns of the paraspinal, gluteus maximus, and hamstring muscles. A three-stage statistical analysis was performed, the final stage being a stepwise logistic regression analysis aimed at identifying the movement and muscle activation pattern variables that best distinguished the two groups.
RESULTS: The final regression model included three lumbar kinematic variables and several electromyographic amplitude variables for the gluteus maximus and hamstring muscles during right-sided prone hip extension. The final model correctly classified 86.7 % of the control group and 83.3 % of the low back pain group.
CONCLUSIONS: The subject of asymmetrical gluteus maximus and hamstring muscle activation appears to be a potentially interesting area for future research on the utility of the prone hip extension test as a clinical tool in diagnosing motor control impairments associated with low back pain.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the association of bisphosphonates with outcomes related to radiographic changes and pain in hip osteoarthritis (OA) over 4 years.
METHODS: This study examined data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI), which included 4088 hips from 2057 participants. Bisphosphonate users were identified as those who reported usage at least three times, including at baseline and during the subsequent 1, 2, 3, and 4-year follow-up visits. Non-users were participants who did not use bisphosphonates in the 5 years preceding the baseline and at subsequent follow-up visits. Generalized estimating equations were performed to assess the association between bisphosphonate use and outcomes related to radiographic changes and pain in hip OA over a 4-year follow-up.
RESULTS: The analysis revealed no statistically significant difference between bisphosphonate users and non-users concerning outcomes related to radiographic changes and pain in hip OA over 4 years. Specifically, the odds ratios for the incidence and transition of radiographic hip OA were 0.55 (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.26 to 1.17) and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.47 to 1.28), respectively. Furthermore, the odds ratios for the development and resolution of frequent hip pain were 1.04 (95% CI: 0.76 to 1.42) and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.72 to 1.36), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this longitudinal study do not suggest an association between bisphosphonate use and the prevention, slowing, or delay of development and transition of radiographic changes or pain in hip OA over a 4-year follow-up.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: How the joints exactly move and interact and how this reflects PD-related gait abnormalities and the response to dopaminergic treatment is poorly understood. A detailed understanding of these kinematics can inform clinical management and treatment decisions. The aim of the study was to investigate the influence of different gait speeds and medication on/off conditions on inter-joint coordination, as well as kinematic differences throughout the whole gait cycle in well characterized pwPD.
METHODS: 29 controls and 29 PD patients during medication on, 8 of them also during medication off walked a straight walking path in slow, preferred and fast walking speeds. Gait data was collected using optical motion capture system. Kinematics of the hip and knee and coordinated hip-knee kinematics were evaluated using Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) and cyclograms (angle-angle plots). Values derived from cyclograms were compared using repeated-measures ANOVA for within group, and ttest for between group comparisons.
RESULTS: PD gait differed from controls mainly by lower knee range of motion (ROM). Adaptation to gait speed in PD was mainly achieved by increasing hip ROM. Regularity of gait was worse in PD but only during preferred speed. The ratios of different speed cyclograms were smaller in the PD groups. SPM analyses revealed that PD participants had smaller hip and knee angles during the swing phase, and PD participants reached peak hip flexion later than controls. Withdrawal of medication showed an exacerbation of only a few parameters.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate the potential of granular kinematic analyses, including > 1 joint, for disease and treatment monitoring in PD. Our approach can be extended to further mobility-limiting conditions and other joint combinations.
BACKGROUND: The study is registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00022998, registered on 04 Sep 2020).

BACKGROUND: Detailed postoperative rehabilitation protocols after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) are still a matter of debate. Adjunctive hip bracing represents a promising tool to improve early patients\' mobilization. To present, the effect of hip brace therapy on postoperative functional outcomes and specific patient individual psychologic factors remains controversially discussed. Consequently, we aimed to report postoperative outcomes focusing on hip function, pain and kinesiophobia between braced and unbraced patients.
METHODS: A prospective, randomized-controlled trial was conducted, including patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAIS. After exclusion, a final study cohort of 36 patients in the intervention group (postoperative hip brace) and 36 patients in the control group (no hip brace) were compared for kinesiophobia (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia), pain (Visual analog scale) and joint function (International Hip Outcome Tool-12) within the first six postoperative months.
RESULTS: Hip arthroscopy significantly improved all patient-reported outcomes in both groups. Intergroup analysis revealed significantly lower levels of kinesiophobia in braced patients at 6-months follow up (30.7 vs. 34.1, p = 0.04) while not negatively affecting pain and joint function. No intra- and postoperative complications occurred within both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: This study could demonstrate that bracing after hip arthroscopy can positively influence kinesiophobia, while the brace did not negatively impact postoperative pain and quality of life. Thus, hip bracing could be a viable assistive therapy in the postoperative rehabilitation phase after hip arthroscopy.