BACKGROUND: This systematic study aims to assess the global epidemiologic, economic, and humanistic burden of illness associated with all types of hereditary angioedema.
METHODS: A systematic search for articles reporting the epidemiologic, economic, and humanistic burden associated with patients with HAE was conducted using English and Chinese literature databases from the inception to May 23, 2022. The selected studies were assessed for their quality and risk of bias. The study was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; CRD42022352377).
RESULTS: In total, 65 articles that met the search inclusion criteria reported 10,310 patients with HAE, of whom 5861 were female patients. Altogether, 4312 patients (81%) and 479 patients (9%) had type 1 and type 2 HAE, respectively, whereas 422 patients (8%) had HAE-normal C1-INH. The overall prevalence of all types of HAE was between 0.13 and 1.6 cases per 100,000. The mean or median delay from the first onset of a symptom of HAE to confirmed diagnosis ranged from 3.9 to 26 years. The estimated risk of death from asphyxiation was 8.6% for patients with HAE. Hospitalization, medication, unnecessary surgeries, doctor visits, specialist services, and nursing costs are direct expenses that contribute to the growing economic burden. The indirect cost accounted mostly due to missing work ($3402/year) and loss of productivity ($5750/year). Furthermore, impairment of QoL as reported by patient-reported outcomes was observed. QoL measures identified depression, anxiety, and stress to be the most common symptoms for adult patients and children.
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the importance of early diagnosis and the need for improving awareness among health care professionals to reduce the burden of HAE on patients and society.

UNASSIGNED: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is characterized by recurrent subcutaneously and/or submucosally localized edematous swellings. The first symptoms often appear in childhood, and they may become more frequent and severe in puberty. Since the appearance of HAE attacks is unpredictable regarding the localization and the frequency, the attacks put a significant burden on the patients and crucially impacts their quality of life.
UNASSIGNED: This review article analyzes the safety data acquired from the clinical trials conducted with the currently available medicinal products for the prophylactic treatment of hereditary angioedema due to C1 inhibitor deficiency and the safety data of observatory studies based on clinical practice. A review of the published literature was conducted using the PubMed database, clinical trials from ClinicalTrials.gov, and abstracts published at scientific conferences.
UNASSIGNED: The currently available therapeutic products have a good safety and efficiency profile and the international guidelines recommend them as first-line treatments. The choice should be made based on the evaluation of the availability and the preference of the patient.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare disease characterized by unpredictable, recurring subcutaneous or submucosal swelling. Without effective therapy, HAE can negatively impact patients\' quality of life. Management of HAE includes on-demand treatment of attacks and short- and long-term prophylaxis (LTP) to prevent attacks. Newer therapies may be more tolerable and effective in managing HAE; however, therapies such as androgens are still widely used in some countries owing to their relative ease of access and adequate disease control for some patients. This study evaluated the characteristics, treatment patterns, clinical outcomes, and healthcare resource utilization of a multinational cohort of patients with HAE, with a focus on understanding reasons for recommending or discontinuing available therapies.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted at 12 centers in six countries and included data from patients with HAE type 1 or 2 who were ≥ 12 years of age at their first clinical visit. The relationship between LTP use and attack rates was evaluated using a multivariable Poisson regression model. Data were collected between March 2018 and July 2019.
RESULTS: Data from 225 patients were collected (62.7% female, 86.2% White, 90.2% type 1); 64.4% of patients had their first HAE-related visit to the center prior to or during 2014. Treatment patterns varied between countries. Overall, 85.8% of patients were prescribed on-demand treatment and 53.8% were prescribed LTP, most commonly the androgen danazol (53.7% of patients who used LTP). Plasma-derived C1 inhibitor (Cinryze®) was used by 29.8% of patients for LTP. Patients who received LTP had a significantly lower rate of HAE attacks than patients who did not receive any LTP (incidence rate ratio (95% confidence interval) 0.90 (0.84-0.96)). Androgens were the most commonly discontinued therapy (51.3%), with low tolerability cited as the most frequent reason for discontinuation (50.0%).
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, findings from this study support the use of LTP in the prevention of HAE attacks; a lower rate of attacks was observed with LTP compared with no LTP. However, the type of LTP used varied between countries, with tolerability and accessibility to specific treatments playing important roles in management decision-making.

Patients with hereditary angioedema (HAE) experience a high burden of disease due to unpredictable, painful, disfiguring, and potentially life-threatening HAE attacks. Multiple HAE-specific medications for the on-demand treatment, short-term and long-term prophylaxis of HAE attacks have entered the market in recent years; however, the availability and access to these medications may vary between different countries. For this review, PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for guidelines, consensus statements, and other publications on HAE management as well as publications on quality of life in patients with HAE. The current guidelines and recent literature on HAE management in specific countries are summarized with the aim to highlight the similarities and differences between guideline recommendations and the country-specific clinical practice. Improvement in quality of life, which is a key goal in HAE management, is also discussed and the country-specific trends are highlighted. Finally, the ways to achieve a more patient-centric approach to HAE management within the framework set by the clinical management guidelines are examined.

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare disease characterized by sudden and often unprovoked episodes of swelling that can be potentially life-threatening when it involves the upper airway. The treatment options for both acute episodes of HAE and LTP, used to minimize the frequency and severity of angioedema attacks, were limited historically to very few options, had considerable side effects, and/or had considerable burden of treatment. Fortunately, through the elucidation of the pathophysiology of HAE, the development of newer targeted therapies has been possible both for acute therapy and long-term prophylaxis and even more are on the horizon. Because of the rapid development of these therapies, it can be challenging for clinicians to keep abreast of newer and developing treatments for HAE. This review article will outline the current and potential future treatments for HAE. It will also highlight important considerations when treating special HAE patient populations including women and pediatric patients.

Through its fluctuating disease activity and unpredictable attacks, hereditary angioedema (HAE) imposes a substantial patient burden. To minimize HAE burden and improve quality of life, treatment should involve individualized management strategies that address on-demand therapy and short-term/long-term prophylaxis. Goals of long-term prophylaxis include reducing the number, severity, and burden of HAE attacks. The best characterized forms of HAE arise from deficiency or dysfunction of C1-inhibitor (C1-INH; types I/II), and C1-INH replacement therapy is a first-line intervention for on-demand (acute) treatment of HAE attacks, short-term prophylaxis before high-risk procedures, and long-term prophylaxis. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trials have shown dose-dependent efficacy with plasma-derived C1-INH (pdC1-INH) 40-60 IU/kg subcutaneously, pdC1-INH 1000 U intravenously, and recombinant human C1-INH (rhC1-INH) 50 IU/kg (maximum 4200 IU) intravenously, all administered twice weekly, as long-term prophylaxis in patients with a history of 2 to ≥4 attacks/month. Overall, up to 83% (pdC1-INH 60 IU/kg) of patients experienced an HAE attack reduction threshold of ≥70%, and up to 58% (pdC1-INH 60 IU/kg) achieved an attack reduction threshold of ≥90%. Lower-dose intravenous pdC1-INH therapy (1000 U) was seemingly less effective, with 45% of 22 patients experiencing an HAE attack reduction threshold of ≥70%, and up to 23% achieving an attack reduction threshold of ≥90%. Higher-dose intravenous rhC1-INH 50 IU/kg (maximum, 4200 IU) twice weekly was of intermediate benefit. Despite a baseline mean attack frequency of 17.9 (during the 3 months prior to study treatment) and a mean attack frequency during a 4-week placebo period of 7.2, 52% of 23 patients experienced ≥70% reduction in attack frequency and 26% of 23 patients experienced ≥90% reduction in attack frequency. The increasing patient percentages treated with C1-INH replacement therapy as long-term prophylaxis meeting these high thresholds reinforces hopes and expectations that \"attack freedom\" is achievable, including for those with moderate or severe disease.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary angioedema with C1 inhibitor deficiency (HAE-C1INH) is a rare disease characterized by swelling episodes. It affects quality of life (QOL) and can be fatal when the upper airways are involved. Treatment is individualized, with therapeutic options including on-demand treatment (ODT) and short- and long-term prophylaxis (STP, LTP). However, available guidelines are not always clear about the selection of treatment, the goals of treatment, or how achievement of these goals is assessed.
OBJECTIVE: To review available evidence for the management of HAE-C1INH and build a Spanish expert consensus to steer management towards a treat-to-target approach, while addressing some of the less clear aspects of the Spanish guidelines.
METHODS: We reviewed the literature on the treat-to-target management of HAE-C1INH, focusing on treatment selection and goals and the tools available to assess whether the goals have been achieved. We discussed the literature based on clinical experience and drew up 45 statements on undefined management aspects. A panel of 53 HAE experts validated the statements through a 2-round Delphi process.
RESULTS: The goals for ODT and STP are to minimize the morbidity and mortality of attacks and to prevent attacks caused by known triggers, respectively, while the main goal of LTP is to decrease the rate, severity, and duration of attacks. Furthermore, when prescribing, clinicians should consider the reduction in adverse effects, while increasing patient QOL and satisfaction. Appropriate instruments for assessing achievement of treatment goals are also indicated.
CONCLUSIONS: We provide recommendations on previously unclear aspects of HAE-C1INH management with ODT, STP, and LTP, focusing on clinical and patient-oriented goals.

Hereditary angioedema due to C1-inhibitor deficiency (C1-INH-HAE) imposes a significant disease burden on patients and their families. Unpredictable episodes of angioedema, which can lead to life-threatening conditions, have a significant impact on the quality of life of the patient. The fundamental aim of the treatment of C1-INH-HAE is to ensure that patients can lead a normal life. The most effective way to do this is to prevent the onset of angioedema attacks.
This review gives a brief overview of the safety and efficacy of the oral kallikrein inhibitor berotralstat in C1-INH-HAE disease. It provides a comprehensive synopsis of the results of the first clinical trials with a targeted oral kallikrein inhibitor (APeX-1 [NCT02870972]; ZENITH-1 [NCT03240133]; APeX-2 [NCT03485911]; APeX-S [NCT03472040]; APeX-J [NCT03873116]), reviewing evidence on the efficacy and safety of the drug, and placing berotralstat on the spectrum of long-term prophylactic therapeutic options.
The availability of the first targeted oral prophylactic drug, the kallikrein inhibitor berotralstat, in 2021, is a milestone in the treatment of patients with hereditary angioedema.

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a genetic disorder characterized by re-occurring swelling episodes called \"attacks,\" usually in the limbs, face, airways, and intestinal tract. New prophylactic therapies have reduced the frequency of these attacks. This study describes results from a literature review and clinician interviews assessing patient HAE symptom experiences and timing, and then evaluates whether existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) tools adequately reflect this experience.
A targeted literature review as well as interviews with key opinion leaders (KOLs), were conducted to capture information about the patient experience and their symptoms. An assessment of various PROs was then conducted to determine how well they each covered HAE symptoms and impacts.
Nineteen HAE symptoms were identified. KOLs reported that patients on prophylactic therapy experienced some symptoms indicating an attack was imminent, but then never experienced an attack. The comparison of the different PROs found that the Hereditary Angioedema Patient-Reported Outcome was the instrument that most thoroughly examined the symptoms of patients with HAE.
Given the introduction of new prophylactic therapies, further research is needed to determine the effect of being attack-free for longer periods of time on health-related quality of life.

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare genetic disease that can lead to potentially life-threatening airway attacks. Although novel therapies for HAE treatment have become available over the past decades, a comparison of all available treatments has not yet been conducted. As such, we will perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis to identify the best evidence-based treatments for the management of acute attacks and prophylaxis of HAE.
This study will include both parallel and crossover randomized controlled trials that have investigated prevention or treatment strategies for HAE attacks. We will search electronic databases, including Medline, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and CINAHL, from inception with no language restrictions. Potential trials will be supplemented through a gray literature search. The process of study screening, selection, data extraction, risk-of-bias assessment, certainty assessment and classification of treatments will be performed independently by a pair of reviewers. Any discrepancy will be addressed through team discussion. A two-step approach of pairwise and network meta-analysis will be performed. The summarized effect estimates of direct and indirect treatment comparisons will be pooled using DerSimonion-Laird random-effects models. The incoherence assumption, in terms of the consistency of direct and indirect effects, will be assessed. An evidence-based synthesis will be performed, based on the magnitudes of effect size, evidence certainty, and ranking of treatment effects, with respect to treatment benefits and harms.
This systematic review and network meta-analysis will summarize evidence-based conclusions with respect to the ratio of benefits and harms arising from interventions for the treatment of acute attacks and prophylaxis of HAE. Evidence from this network estimate could promote the rational use of interventions among people living with HAE in clinical practice settings. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021251367.