UNASSIGNED: A minority of geriatric hip fracture patients pursue non-operative treatment. Compared with surgical patients, non-operative patients have higher mortality rates. However, patient satisfaction following non-operative vs operative treatment has not been investigated extensively. The purpose of this study was to compare satisfaction among non-operatively vs operatively treated hip fracture patients.
UNASSIGNED: We identified patients aged 60+ years with proximal femur fractures treated over a 10-year period. Excluded were patients with isolated greater/lesser trochanteric fractures. Patients or relatives were asked to complete a 6-question survey about their treatment satisfaction.
UNASSIGNED: Survey responses from 56 operative and 28 non-operative patients were recorded. Overall, 91.1% of operative and 82.1% of non-operative patients were satisfied with their treatment course (P = 0.260). However, only 71.4% of non-operative patients were satisfied with treatment option explanations vs 83.9% of operative patients (P = 0.014). While only 64.3% of non-operative respondents were satisfied with the ultimate treatment outcome (vs 85.7% of operative patients, P = 0.025), 89.3% of patients in each cohort would choose the same treatment plan again.
UNASSIGNED: Our findings highlight the complexity of defining patient satisfaction, particularly in a geriatric hip fracture population. Unlike previous studies, we chose a direct approach to quantifying patient satisfaction by asking participants specifically about satisfaction with treatment outcome and the overall treatment course. Additional survey questions were then included to assess factors considered important in treatment satisfaction, such as health care provider treatment explanations, post-treatment mobility, and palliative care service involvement.
UNASSIGNED: We identified significant differences between non-operatively and operatively treated geriatric hip fracture patients regarding satisfaction with the explanation of treatment options, and ultimate treatment outcomes. There was no significant difference in overall satisfaction with the treatment course or likelihood of choosing the same treatment again. Further research investigating patient satisfaction following geriatric hip fracture treatment is warranted.

BACKGROUND: Acute hip fractures are a public health problem affecting primarily older adults. Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer may be useful in providing appropriate clinical recommendations for beneficial treatment.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT)-4.0 by comparing its appropriateness scores for acute hip fractures with the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Appropriate Use Criteria given 30 patient scenarios. \"Appropriateness\" indicates the unexpected health benefits of treatment exceed the expected negative consequences by a wide margin.
METHODS: Using the AAOS Appropriate Use Criteria as the benchmark, numerical scores from 1 to 9 assessed appropriateness. For each patient scenario, ChatGPT-4.0 was asked to assign an appropriate score for six treatments to manage acute hip fractures.
RESULTS: Thirty patient scenarios were evaluated for 180 paired scores. Comparing ChatGPT-4.0 with AAOS scores, there was a positive correlation for multiple cannulated screw fixation, total hip arthroplasty, hemiarthroplasty, and long cephalomedullary nails. Statistically significant differences were observed only between scores for long cephalomedullary nails.
CONCLUSIONS: ChatGPT-4.0 scores were not concordant with AAOS scores, overestimating the appropriateness of total hip arthroplasty, hemiarthroplasty, and long cephalomedullary nails, and underestimating the other three. ChatGPT-4.0 was inadequate in selecting an appropriate treatment deemed acceptable, most reasonable, and most likely to improve patient outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The influence of prior colostomy or ileostomy on patients undergoing joint arthroplasty remains poorly understood. Our study aimed to assess whether patients with an ostomy undergoing hip and knee arthroplasties have worse postoperative outcomes and increased rates of revisions.
METHODS: A single-center, retrospective review of patients with a history of bowel ostomy who underwent a primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), hemiarthroplasty (HA), and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from 2012 to 2021. A total of 24 THAs, 11 HAs, and 25 TKAs in patients with open small or large bowel stoma were identified. A ten-to-one propensity score match was utilized to establish cohorts with comparable demographics but no prior ostomy procedure.
RESULTS: Patients with stomas undergoing elective THA showed greater 90-day ED visits (20.0 vs. 5.0%, P = 0.009), 90-day all-cause readmissions (20.0 vs. 5.0%, P = 0.009), 90-day non-orthopedic readmissions (10.0 vs. 0.5%, P < 0.001), 90-day readmissions for infection (5.0 vs. 0.5%, P = 0.043), all-cause revisions (15.0 vs. 0.5%, P < 0.001), revisions for PJI (5.0 vs. 0%, P = 0.043), and revisions for peri-prosthetic fracture (10.0 vs. 0%, P < 0.001). Patients with stomas undergoing non-elective hip arthroplasties exhibited a longer mean LOS (12.1 vs. 7.0 days, P < 0.001) and increased 90-day all-cause readmissions (40.0 vs. 17.3%, P = 0.034), 90-day orthopedic readmissions (26.7 vs. 6.0%, P = 0.005), all-cause revisions (13.3 vs. 2.0%, P = 0.015), revisions for peri-prosthetic fracture (6.7 vs. 0%, P = 0.002), and revisions for aseptic loosening (6.7 vs. 0%, P = 0.002). There were no significant differences in readmission or revision rates between ostomy patients undergoing TKA and a matched control group.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing hip arthroplasties with an open stoma are at an increased risk of hospital encounters and revisions, whereas TKA patients with stomas are not at increased risk of complications. These findings emphasize the importance of recognizing and addressing the unique challenges associated with this patient population.

BACKGROUND: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) has gained popularity for the operative treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHF). The purpose of this study was to compare racial differences in surgical management of PHF between open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), hemiarthroplasty, and rTSA. Our hypothesis was that there would be no difference in fixation by race.
METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried for ORIF, rTSA, and hemiarthroplasty between 2006 and 2020 for patients with a PHF. Race, ethnicity, age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class were recorded. Chi squared tests were performed to assess relationships between patient factors and operative intervention. Factors significant at the 0.10 level in univariable analyses were included in a multivariable multinomial model to predict operative intervention.
RESULTS: 7,499 patients underwent surgical treatment for a PHF, including 526 (7%) undergoing hemiarthroplasty, 5,011 (67%) undergoing ORIF, and 1,962 (26%) undergoing rTSA. 27% of white patients with PHF underwent rTSA compared to 21% of Black patients, 16% of Asian patients, and 14% of Native American and Alaskan Native patients (p<0.001). In the multivariable analysis, utilization of rTSA increased over time (OR 1.2 per year since 2006, p < 0.001) and hemiarthroplasty decreased over time (OR 0.86 per year since 2006, p < 0.001). Non-white patients had significantly lower odds of undergoing rTSA versus ORIF (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58-0.97), as did male patients (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.66-0.88). Patients over 65 (OR 3.86, 95% CI 3.39-4.38), patients with higher ASA classifications (ASA2: OR 3.24, 95% CI 1.86-5.66, ASA3: OR 4.77, 95% CI 2.74-8.32, ASA4: OR 5.25, 95% CI 2.89-9.54), and patients who were overweight (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.14-1.55) or obese (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.32-1.75) had higher odds of undergoing rTSA versus ORIF.
CONCLUSIONS: As utilization of rTSA increases, understanding disparities in surgical treatment of PHF is crucial to improving outcomes and equitable access to emerging orthopedic technologies. While patient factors such as age, BMI, and comorbidities are known to directly impact outcomes and thus may be predictive of the type of surgical intervention, patient race should not dictate treatment.

Ramadanov et al.\'s study highlights the importance of minimizing operative time in HHA for femoral neck fractures. Future prospective studies are needed to explore causality and refine strategies for achieving shorter, yet safe, procedures.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to compare the short-term outcome of SuperPATH, direct anterior (DAA) and conventional approach (CA) hemiarthroplasty (HA) in patients with femoral neck fractures using a network meta-analysis.
METHODS: PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Epistemonikos, and Embase were searched until May 31, 2024. In a network meta-analysis, mean differences with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method and a fixed/random effects model for continuous outcomes, and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method and a fixed/random effects model for dichotomous outcomes.
RESULTS: The literature search identified a total of 9 randomized controlled trials on SuperPATH with 762 patients and 8 randomized controlled trials on DAA with 641 patients. In the overall ranking, SuperPATH was placed first, DAA second and CA third. SuperPATH HA was best in 7, second best in 2 and third best in 1 of the 10 outcome parameters. DAA HA was best in 2 and second best in 8 of the 10 outcome parameters. CA HA was best in 1 and third best in 9 of the 10 outcome parameters. In the indirect comparison between SuperPATH HA and DAA HA, SuperPATH HA had a 1.36 point lower visual analog scale at 2 to 7 days postoperatively and a 0.17 lower overall complication rate compared to DAA.
CONCLUSIONS: For the treatment of patients with femoral neck fractures, SuperPATH HA ranked first, DAA HA ranked second and CA HA ranked third. Based on the results, we recommend that trauma surgeons increase their use of minimally invasive hip HA techniques. It should be noted that SuperPATH HA had a significantly lower overall complication rate compared to DAA HA when the minimally invasive technique was chosen.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the operation is to replace the articular surface of the distal humerus in cases of nonreconstructible fractures of the distal humerus.
METHODS: Active patients with high functional requirements, in whom weight limitation of total elbow arthroplasty should be avoided.
METHODS: Contraindications include fractures with irreconstructible epicondyles and/or irreconstructible collateral ligaments, as well as ulnohumeral, or radiohumeral osteoarthritis.
METHODS: Following subcutaneous anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve, surgical dislocation of the elbow joint is achieved through a paratricipital approach with release of the soft tissue structures from the humerus. After resection of the trochlea, the intramedullary canal of the humerus is prepared using rasps in order to implant the hemiprosthesis with retrograde cementing. Finally, the medial and lateral collateral ligaments as well as the flexors and extensors are repaired.
METHODS: Early functional rehabilitation in a hinged elbow orthosis while avoiding varus/valgus stress after wound healing is completed.
RESULTS: Between 2018 and 2022, 18 patients with coronal shear fractures were treated with elbow hemiarthroplasty. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) was 79 (70-95) after a mean follow-up of 12 months. The mean range of motion was 99° (70-130°) in extension-flexion and 162° (90-180°) in pronation-supination.
UNASSIGNED: OPERATIONSZIEL: Ziel der Operation ist der Ersatz der Gelenkfläche des distalen Humerus bei nicht rekonstruierbaren Frakturen des distalen Humerus.
UNASSIGNED: Aktive Patienten mit hohem funktionellem Anspruch, bei denen eine Gewichtslimitierung aufgrund einer Ellenbogentotalendoprothese vermieden werden soll.
UNASSIGNED: Kontraindikationen bestehen bei Frakturen mit nicht rekonstruierbaren Epikondylen und/oder nicht rekonstruierbaren Kollateralbändern sowie bei ulnohumeraler oder radiohumeraler Arthrose.
UNASSIGNED: Über einen paratrizipitalen Zugang erfolgt nach subkutaner, anteriorer Transposition des N. ulnaris die chirurgische Luxation des Gelenks durch humerales Ablösen der Weichteilstrukturen. Anschließend wird die Trochlea reseziert und der Humerus mittels Raspeln eröffnet, sodass anschließend die Hemiprothese unter retrograder Zementierung implantiert werden kann. Abschließend erfolgt die Rekonstruktion des medialen und lateralen Kollateralbandapparats sowie der Flexoren und Extensoren.
UNASSIGNED: Frühfunktionelle Beübung des Ellenbogens in der Bewegungsorthese unter Vermeidung von Varus‑/Valgusstress nach Abschluss der Wundheilung.
UNASSIGNED: Zwischen 2018 und 2022 wurden 18 Patienten mit koronaren Abscherfrakturen mit einer Hemiprothese versorgt. Der durchschnittliche Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) lag nach einem mittleren Nachverfolgungszeitraum von 12 Monaten bei 79 Punkten (70–95). Der durchschnittliche Bewegungsumfang betrug in Extension-Flexion 99° (70–130°), in Pronation-Supination 162° (90–180°).

UNASSIGNED: Bipolar hemiarthroplasty is commonly performed to treat displaced femoral neck fractures in osteoporotic patients. This study aimed to assess the occurrence and outcomes of unplanned return visits to the emergency department (ED) within 90 days following bipolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures.
UNASSIGNED: The clinical data of 1322 consecutive patients who underwent bipolar hemiarthroplasty for osteoporotic femoral neck fractures at a tertiary medical center were analyzed. Data from the patients\' electronic medical records, including demographic information, comorbidities, and operative details, were collected. The risk factors and mortality rates were analyzed.
UNASSIGNED: Within 90 days after surgery, 19.9% of patients returned to the ED. Surgery-related reasons accounted for 20.2% of the patient\'s returns. Older age, a high Charlson comorbidity index score, chronic kidney disease, and a history of cancer were identified as significant risk factors for unplanned ED visits. Patients with uncemented implants had a significantly greater risk of returning to the ED due to periprosthetic fractures than did those with cemented implants (P = 0.04). Patients who returned to the ED within 90 days had an almost fivefold greater 1-year mortality rate (15.2% vs 3.1%, P < 0.001) and a greater overall mortality rate (26.2% vs 10.5%, P < 0.001).
UNASSIGNED: This study highlights the importance of identifying risk factors for unplanned ED visits after bipolar hemiarthroplasty, which may contribute to a better prognosis. Consideration should be given to the use of cemented implants for hemiarthroplasty, as uncemented implants are associated with a greater risk of periprosthetic fractures.

BACKGROUND Renal osteodystrophy is a serious complication of advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). It predisposes the patient to fragility fracture and an increased risk of mortality. CASE REPORT We present the case of a 50-year-old male patient with stage 4 CKD and consequent renal osteodystrophy, who presented with a history of a recent provoked seizure, a severe electrolyte imbalance, and excruciating pain in the hip region. He had no history of a fall or trauma. A radiographic evaluation confirmed the rare finding of a bilateral femoral neck fracture. Upon stabilizing the patient, he was surgically managed with a bilateral hemiarthroplasty. A postoperative radiograph revealed a well-fixed prosthesis with no post-surgical complications. The patient had a full recovery. At the last follow-up visit, the patient was fully functional and had resumed normal activities. CONCLUSIONS This is a rare report with unusual mechanism of injury, involving a case of bilateral femoral neck fragility fractures, secondary to renal osteodystrophy in a stage 4 CKD patient. It draws the attention of medical care providers to the high risk of femoral fragility fractures that are secondary to renal osteodystrophy. Hemiarthroplasty is a safe and highly efficacious surgical option for managing such cases. This case also reiterates the dire need for greater public awareness and knowledge of CKD. Early diagnosis and treatment can substantially mitigate the associated morbidity and mortality.

UNASSIGNED: A plain pelvic radiograph is usually conducted with the lower limbs in internal rotation. This is to correct the anteversion of the femur. However, in the fracture neck of the femur, internal rotation of the fractured limb is avoided, because it would be painful. We examined the effect of correction of anteversion or otherwise on the diameter of the head of the femur using imaging.
UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to determine if there was a significant difference between the femoral head diameter at two different positions, at the normal anatomical position (without correcting the anteversion) and at the corrected anteversion position. It also aimed to document the correlation and the statistical significance between the differences in the size of the diameter at these two different positions with the anteversion angles of the femoral bone.
UNASSIGNED: Two sets of digital photographs of the proximal part of 55 non-sexed, non-paired femoral bones were taken. Images obtained were at two positions: normal anatomical (with anteversion uncorrected) and anteversion corrected positions. The diameters of the head of the femur were documented at these two different positions. The anteversion angles and actual femoral head (AFH) diameters were also measured and documented.
UNASSIGNED: The femoral head diameters at anatomical positions were persistently larger than those measured after the anteversion was corrected, except in three femoral bones (5%) where no differences were observed. The difference in the two measurements was statistically significant to the anteversion angle of the femoral bone. (P = 0.0005). The means of the two sets of measurements were statistically different from each other. Pairwise correlation showed that both were strongly associated with the AFH diameter but the measurements from images with corrected anteversion had a higher value (0.8166) than the measurements from normal anatomical position (0.7526).
UNASSIGNED: The correction of femoral anteversion produced femoral head size measurements that were closer to AFH diameters compared to those without the correction of the femoral anteversion. Femoral anteversion should always be corrected as per protocol.