hemiarthroplasty

半关节成形术
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:对于老年股骨颈骨折患者,贫血是最常见的并发症之一,增加术后不良事件的风险。氨甲环酸(TXA)已广泛应用于围手术期血液管理。然而,老年股骨颈骨折患者TXA的最佳给药途径尚不清楚.这项研究的目的是评估口服和静脉(IV)应用TXA在老年股骨颈骨折患者行全髋关节置换术(THA)和半髋关节置换术(HA)中的疗效和安全性。
    方法:纳入2020年8月1日至2022年2月28日创伤骨科收治的65岁以上股骨颈骨折老年患者。将参与者分为三组:口服组:切口前2小时口服TXA2g;IV组:切口前15分钟静脉输注TXA1g;对照组:常规止血方法。主要结果是总失血,同种异体输血率,和术后血栓栓塞事件。SPSS23.0(IBM,Armonk,NY,美国)用于统计分析,p≤0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
    结果:共纳入100例患者,包括口服组32例,IV组34例,对照组34例。与对照组相比,口服组和IV组的围手术期总失血量明显减少(763.92±358.64mLvs744.62±306.88mLvs1250.60±563.37mL,p=0.048)。在口服组和IV组之间没有发现显著差异(p=0.970)。口服组和IV组的异体输血率低于对照组,但差异无统计学意义(6vs5vs12,p=0.108),然而,亚组分析显示,与对照组相比,接受THA的患者的IV组和口服组的输血率显着降低(1vs3vs7,p=0.02)。在6个月的随访中,未发现血栓栓塞事件.两名患者(口服组一名,对照组一名)死于呼吸衰竭。口服组的血液管理成本显着低于IV(p<0.001)和对照组(p=0.009)。
    结论:接受THA的老年股骨颈骨折患者可从静脉注射和口服氨甲环酸中获益。这两种给药途径的结果在安全性和有效性方面相似。在接受HA的患者中观察到类似的趋势。与静脉应用相比,口服TXA更具成本效益。
    OBJECTIVE: For elderly femoral neck fracture patients, anemia is one of the most common complications, increasing the risk of postoperative adverse events. Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been widely applied to the perioperative blood management. However, the optimal route of TXA administration in elderly femoral neck fracture remains unclear. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral and intravenous (IV) application of TXA in elderly patients with femoral neck fracture undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) and hemiarthroplasty (HA).
    METHODS: All elderly patients aged over 65 years old diagnosed with femoral neck fracture admitted to the trauma orthopedics from August 1, 2020 to February 28, 2022 were enrolled in this prospective cohort study. Participants were divided into three groups: oral group: TXA 2g orally 2 h before incision; IV group: intravenous infusion of TXA 1g 15 min before incision; and control group: usual hemostatic method. The primary outcomes were total blood loss, allogeneic transfusion rate, and postoperative thromboembolic events. SPSS 23.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analysis, and p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
    RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were enrolled, including 32 cases in the oral group, 34 cases in the IV group and 34 cases in the control group. Compared with the control group, the total perioperative blood loss in the oral and IV groups was significantly decreased (763.92 ± 358.64 mL vs 744.62 ± 306.88 mL vs 1250.60 ± 563.37 mL, p = 0.048). No significant difference was identified between the oral and IV groups (p = 0.970). The rate of allogeneic transfusion was lower in the oral and IV groups than in the control group, but the difference had no statistical significant (6 vs 5 vs 12, p = 0.108), However, subgroup analysis showed that the IV and oral groups in patients who underwent THA have significant lower transfusion rate compared with the control group (1 vs 3 vs 7, p = 0.02). During 6 months follow-up, no thromboembolic events were identified. Two patients (one from the oral group and one from the control group) died of respiratory failure. The cost of blood management from the oral group was significantly lower than IV (p < 0.001) and control groups (p = 0.009).
    CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients with femoral neck fracture undergoing THA can benefit from both IV and oral administration of tranexamic acid. The results of these two administration routes are similar in safety and effectiveness. A similar tendency was observed in patients undergoing HA. Oral TXA is more cost-benefit compared with intravenous applications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:骨水泥增强的股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA)增强了老年骨质疏松性股骨粗隆间骨折内固定的锚固能力。然而,是否优于半髋关节置换术仍存在争议。本研究旨在确定哪种治疗方法在老年患者中具有更好的临床效果。
    方法:我们回顾性分析了102例发生股骨粗隆间骨折并接受PFNA联合骨水泥增强内固定的老年骨质疏松症患者(CE组,n=52),和2012年9月至2018年10月的半髋关节置换术(n=50,HA组)。所有股骨粗隆间骨折均按AO/OTA分类。此外,手术时间,术中失血,术中和术后输血率,术后负重时间,住院时间,Barthel日常生活活动指数,髋关节功能Harris评分,视觉模拟(VAS)疼痛评分,比较两组患者术后并发症。
    结果:CE组手术时间明显缩短,术中失血少,降低输血率,术后负重时间长于HA组。CE组的Barthel日常生活活动指数较低,哈里斯得分较低,术后第1个月和第3个月的VAS评分高于HA组,但从6个月到12个月,两组之间没有观察到差异。两组术后总并发症比较差异无统计学意义。
    结论:与HA相比,使用PFNA联合骨水泥增强内固定技术可缩短老年患者的手术时间,减少术中失血量和创伤。
    BACKGROUND: The proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) with cement enhancement enhances the anchorage ability of internal fixation in elderly with osteoporotic intertrochanteric fracture. However, whether it is superior to hemiarthroplasty is still controversial. The present study aimed to determine which treatment has better clinical outcomes among older patients.
    METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 102 elderly patients with osteoporosis who developed intertrochanteric fractures and underwent PFNA combined with cement-enhanced internal fixation (n = 52, CE group), and hemiarthroplasty (n = 50, HA group) from September 2012 to October 2018. All the intertrochanteric fractures were classified according to the AO/OTA classification. Additionally, the operative time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative and postoperative blood transfusion rates, postoperative weight-bearing time, hospitalization time, Barthel Index of Activities Daily Living, Harris score of hip function, visual analog (VAS) pain score, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.
    RESULTS: The CE group had significantly shorter operative time, lesser intraoperative blood loss, lower blood transfusion rate, and longer postoperative weight-bearing time than the HA group. The CE group had lower Barthel\'s Index of Activities of Daily Living, lower Harris\' score, and higher VAS scores in the first and third months after surgery than the HA group, but no difference was observed between the two groups from 6 months to 12 months. There was no significant difference in the total post-operative complications between the two groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: The use of PFNA combined with a cement-enhanced internal fixation technique led to shorter operative time and lesser intraoperative blood loss and trauma in elderly patients as compared to HA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    背景:各种手术技术和保守疗法是治疗肱骨近端骨折(PHFs)的有用工具,但重要的是要了解如何正确地利用它们。因此,我们进行了系统评价和网络荟萃分析,对PHF药物治疗的疗效和安全性进行了比较和排名.
    方法:PubMed,Embase,Cochrane图书馆,系统搜索ClinicalTrials.gov数据库中的合格随机对照试验(RCT),从开始至2022年6月.保守治疗控制或头对头切开复位内固定(ORIF)的RCT,髓内钉(IMN),半髋关节置换术(HA),包括用于治疗成人PHF患者的反向全肩关节置换术(RTSA)。应用累积排序(SUCRA)概率下的表面来比较PHF的医学治疗效果并对其进行排序。
    结果:选择了18个RCT,涉及1,182例PHF患者进行最终分析。大多数群体之间的基线特征平衡良好,不平衡的因素只包括年龄,损伤类型,内侧粉碎,失血,和认知功能在单一试验中。SUCRA概率发现,RTSA对Constant-Murley评分提供了最佳效果(SUCRA:100.0%),和手臂的残疾,肩和手(DASH)得分(SUCRA:99.0%)。此外,与其他治疗方式相比,HA(SUCRA:85.5%)和RTSA(SUCRA:68.0%)对健康相关生活质量的影响相对更好。此外,保守治疗(SUCRA:84.3%)和RTSA(SUCRA:80.7%)与二次手术风险较低相关.最后,对并发症风险的最佳影响是多种多样的,包括保守治疗观察到感染(SUCRA:94.2%);HA中观察到缺血性坏死(SUCRA:78.1%),在RTSA中观察到不愈合(SUCRA:69.6%),在HA中观察到骨关节炎(SUCRA:93.9%)。
    结论:这项研究发现,RTSA与更好的功能结果相关,而二次手术和并发症的比较结果各不相同。PHF的最佳治疗应考虑患者特异性因素。
    BACKGROUND: Various surgical techniques and conservative therapies are useful tools for treating proximal humerus fractures (PHFs), but it is important to understand how to properly utilize them. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare and rank the efficacy and safety of medical treatments for PHF.
    METHODS: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the ClinicalTrials.gov databases were systematically searched for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception until June 2022. Conservative therapy-controlled or head-to-head RCTs of open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), intramedullary nailing (IMN), hemiarthroplasty (HA), and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) used for the treatment of adult patients with PHF were included. The surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) probabilities were applied to compare and rank the effects of medical treatments for PHF.
    RESULTS: Eighteen RCTs involving 1,182 patients with PHF were selected for the final analysis. Mostly baseline characteristics among groups were well balanced, and the imbalanced factors only included age, injury type, medial comminution, blood loss, and cognitive function in single trial. The SUCRA probabilities found that RTSA provided the best effect on the Constant-Murley score (SUCRA: 100.0%), and the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score (SUCRA: 99.0%). Moreover, HA (SUCRA: 85.5%) and RTSA (SUCRA: 68.0%) had a relatively better effect on health-related quality of life than the other treatment modalities. Furthermore, conservative therapy (SUCRA: 84.3%) and RTSA (SUCRA: 80.7%) were associated with a lower risk of secondary surgery. Finally, the best effects on the risk of complications are varied, including infection was observed with conservative therapy (SUCRA: 94.2%); avascular necrosis was observed in HA (SUCRA: 78.1%), nonunion was observed in RTSA (SUCRA: 69.6%), and osteoarthritis was observed in HA (SUCRA: 93.9%).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study found that RTSA was associated with better functional outcomes, while the comparative outcomes of secondary surgery and complications varied. Optimal treatment for PHF should consider patient-specific factors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    目的:对比分析直接上入路(DSA)与后外侧入路(PLA)在老年股骨颈骨折人工股骨头置换术中的早期临床效果。
    方法:回顾性分析2020年1月至2021年12月行人工股骨头置换术的72例老年股骨颈骨折患者的临床资料。其中,36例患者行微创DSA手术,男10例,女26例,平均年龄(82.82±4.05)岁;其余36例患者行传统PLA手术,男14例,女22例,平均年龄(82.79±3.21)岁。比较两组患者围手术期相关指标及随访期间Harris评分。
    结果:两组手术时间比较,DSA组的(79.41±17.39)min短于PLA组的(98.45±26.58)min;切口长度(8.33±2.69)cm短于PLA组的(11.18±1.33)cm;术中出血量(138.46±71.58)ml少于PLA组的(173.51±87.17)ml。初始着陆时间(3.04±0.95)d早于PLA组(4.52±1.10)d,PLA组住院时间(8.70±1.89)d短于(10.67±2.35)d(P<0.05)。两组患者术前Harris评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后1个月DSA组Harris评分高于PLA组(P<0.05),但手术后12个月,两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
    结论:与PLA相比,DSA在手术时间、术中失血,切口长度,首次着陆时间,半髋关节置换术后1个月的住院时间和Harris评分,在促进老年股骨颈患者术后早期康复方面具有比较优势。
    OBJECTIVE: To compare and analyze the early clinical effect of direct superior approach(DSA) and posterior lateral approach (PLA) in hemiarthroplasty for elderly patients with femoral neck fracture.
    METHODS: The clinical data of 72 elderly patients with femoral neck fracture who underwent hemiarthroplasty from January 2020 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 36 patients were operated through minimally invasive DSA including 10 males and 26 females with an average age of (82.82±4.05) years old; the other 36 patients underwent traditional PLA including 14 males and 22 females with an average age of (82.79±3.21) years old. The perioperative related indexes and Harris scores during follow-up between two groups were compared.
    RESULTS: Comparison of operation time between two groups, (79.41±17.39) min of DSA group was shorter than(98.45±26.58) min of PLA group;incision length (8.33±2.69) cm was shorter than (11.18±1.33) cm of PLA group;intraoperative blood loss (138.46±71.58) ml was less than (173.51±87.17) ml of PLA group, initial landing time (3.04±0.95) d was earlier than (4.52±1.10) d of PLA group, hospitalization time (8.70±1.89) d was shorter than (10.67±2.35) d of PLA group(P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in Harris score between two groups before operation(P>0.05), but Harris score in DSA group was higher than that of PLA group at 1 month after operation(P<0.05), but at 12 months after operation, the difference was not statistically significant between two groups(P>0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Compared with PLA, DSA is superior in clinical indexes such as operation time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, first landing time, length of hospitalization and Harris score in the first month after operation in hemi hip replacement, and has comparative advantages in promoting early postoperative rehabilitation of elderly patients with femoral neck.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是评估长期生存率,并发症,以及缺血性卒中患者使用约束聚乙烯衬垫的半髋关节置换术和全髋关节置换术的临床和放射学结果。
    本研究是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了2010年3月至2017年9月接受髋关节置换术的缺血性卒中患者。在“约束髋臼衬垫(CAL)”组中,患者接受了带有约束聚乙烯衬里的非骨水泥髋臼壳。双流动性(DM)组行半髋关节置换术(HA)。此外,髋关节功能,运动范围,生活质量,临床并发症的发生率,和假体的稳定性进行了研究。
    96例单侧股骨颈骨折行CAL髋关节置换术的患者被纳入CAL组,而接受双动头髋关节置换术的103例患者被纳入DM组.VAS,和SF-36数据可用于CAL和DM组。术后1年随访,CAL组HHS明显低于DM组(80.83±3.91vs.83.17±4.15,P<0.05)。CAL组的VAS评分在1年随访时达到峰值(2.07±0.91vs.1.49±0.85,P<0.05)。然而,两组在HSS方面没有显着差异,VAS,和SF-36在手术后的最后一次随访。DM组的手术时间和出血量明显低于CAL组(105.30±29.68vs.94.85±31.07;355.11±123.95vs.302.22±107.68,P<0.05)。此外,两组之间的平均腿长差异没有显着差异。
    临床,成像,分析CAL组和DM组的术后并发症。DM的预后似乎更有利于患者的早期恢复,但是观察到复发性脱位的可能性更高。CAL为高危患者的原发性THA提供了出色的稳定性;然而,应注意防止无菌性松动。
    UNASSIGNED: The objective of this study was to assess the long-term survival rate, complications, as well as the clinical and radiological outcomes of hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty using constrained polyethylene liners in patients with ischemic stroke.
    UNASSIGNED: This study was a retrospective cohort study that included patients with ischemic stroke who underwent hip arthroplasty from March 2010 to September 2017. In the Constrained Acetabular Liners (CAL) group, patients received an uncemented acetabular shell with a constrained polyethylene liner. The Dual Mobility (DM) group underwent hemiarthroplasty (HA). Additionally, hip function, range of motion, quality of life, the incidence of clinical complications, and prosthesis stability were investigated.
    UNASSIGNED: 96 patients with unilateral femoral neck fractures who underwent hip replacement with CAL were included in the CAL group, while 103 patients who underwent hip replacement with a dual mobility head were included in the DM group. VAS, and SF-36 data were available for both CAL and DM groups. At the 1-year postoperative follow-up, the HHS in the CAL group was significantly lower than that in the DM group (80.83 ± 3.91 vs. 83.17 ± 4.15, P < 0.05). The VAS score in the CAL group peaked at the 1-year follow-up (2.07 ± 0.91 vs. 1.49 ± 0.85, P < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of HSS, VAS, and SF-36 at the last follow-up after surgery. Operative time and the amount of bleeding in the DM group were significantly lower than those in the CAL group (105.30 ± 29.68 vs. 94.85 ± 31.07; 355.11 ± 123.95 vs. 302.22 ± 107.68, P < 0.05). Additionally, there was no significant difference in the mean leg length discrepancy between the two groups.
    UNASSIGNED: The clinical, imaging, and postoperative complications of the CAL and DM groups were analyzed. The prognosis for DM appears to be more beneficial for early patient recovery, but a higher likelihood of recurrent dislocation is observed. CAL offers excellent stability for primary THA in high-risk patients; however, attention should be given to preventing aseptic loosening.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    患有神经系统疾病的患者通常在股骨近端置换(PFR)手术后术后并发症的发生率很高。骨科医生在治疗帕金森氏病(PD)方面面临重大困难,肌肉过度紧张,增加骨折的风险。本研究的目的是评估肿瘤切除后PD对PFR的影响。
    从2010年到2020年进行了一项回顾性研究,重点是一个单独的机构,分析了9例诊断为PD的患者,这些患者因肿瘤切除而接受了半髋关节置换术并进行了PFR。该研究由2名男性和7名女性组成,平均年龄71岁(SD,12)年。我们根据疼痛管理评估了手术后的结果,生活质量,功能能力,并发症的发生,和生存时间。
    所有9名患者都接受了计划的手术。未观察到术中并发症。平均随访期为24(SD,20个月,从8到72个月不等。尽管有8名患者因肿瘤进展而去世,在这一点上,内置假体仍然很好。术前VAS评分为7分(SD,1.87)降低到术后评分2(SD,1.32).KPS提高到73(SD,7)从52(SD,14),术后。手术后,疼痛水平和总体生活质量评分均显著提高.手术后,个人能够稳定地走动,恢复正常的日常生活。活着的患者的平均MSTS评分为21分(SD,2.5),从17到25。总的来说,有四名(44.4%)病人在手术后出现并发症,包括一个伤口裂开,一个假体骨折,一次髋关节脱位,和一次局部复发。
    PD患者肿瘤切除后,通过PFR和半髋关节置换术可以实现功能和疼痛缓解的显着改善。实施充分的准备和精心护理可减少PD患者的并发症并改善预后。
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with neurological disorders often experience a high incidence of postoperative complications following proximal femur replacement (PFR) surgery. The orthopaedist faces a significant difficulty in treating Parkinson\'s disease (PD) because of the weakened bone condition, excessive muscle tension, and increased risk of fractures. The objective of this research is to assess the impact of PD on PFR following tumor removal.
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective study was conducted from 2010 to 2020, focusing on a solitary institution, analyzing 9 patients diagnosed with PD who underwent PFR with hemiarthroplasty as a result of tumor removal. The study consists of 2 men and 7 women, with an average age of 71 (SD, 12) years. We assessed the outcomes after surgery in terms of pain management, quality of life, functional ability, occurrence of complications, and survival durations.
    UNASSIGNED: All nine patients underwent planned surgeries. Intraoperative complications was not observed. The average length of the follow-up period was 24 (SD, 20) months, ranging from 8 to 72 months. Despite the fact that 8 patients passed away due to tumor progression, the endoprostheses were still well at that point. The preoperative VAS score of 7 (SD, 1.87) decreased to a postoperative score of 2 (SD, 1.32). The KPS was improved to73 (SD, 7) from 52 (SD, 14), postoperatively. Post-surgery, there were notable enhancements in both pain levels and the overall quality of life scores. Following the surgical procedure, individuals are able to ambulate steadily, resuming their regular daily routines. Living patients had an average MSTS score of 21 (SD, 2.5), ranging from 17 to 25. In total, there were four (44.4%) patients suffered complications after surgery, comprising of one wound dehiscence, one prosthetic fracture, one hip dislocation, and one local recurrence.
    UNASSIGNED: Significant improvements in function and pain relief can be achieved through PFR with hemiarthroplasty following tumor removal in patients with PD. The implementation of thorough preparation and carefull nursing results in reduced complications and improved outcomes in PD patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号