This systematic review examines shared care networks (SCNs) in pediatric oncology as a strategic response to the healthcare challenges in low- and middle-income countries. SCNs integrate specialized hubs with local satellite centers to enhance accessibility and quality of care. Our methodology included a search of PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and Scopus, selecting peer-reviewed articles from the last 20 years. We analyzed nine studies, focusing on SCN definitions, models, and outcomes. Findings reveal that SCNs improve clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction, while reducing economic and emotional burdens through standardized protocols and efficient referral systems. Despite the benefits, challenges remain in maintaining consistent care quality and communication across centers. The review underscores the need for further research to quantify benefits, examine long-term outcomes, and refine operational practices to optimize SCNs\' effectiveness in pediatric oncology.

OBJECTIVE: We described patterns and trends in ED use among adults with epilepsy in the United States.
METHODS: Utilizing inpatient and ED discharge data from seven states, we conducted a cross-sectional analysis to identify adult ED visits diagnosed with epilepsy or seizures from 2010 to 2019. Using ED visit counts and estimates of state-level epilepsy prevalence, we calculated ED visit rates overall and by payer, condition, and year.
RESULTS: Our data captured 304,935 ED visits with epilepsy as a primary or secondary diagnosis in 2019. Across the seven states, visit rates ranged between 366 and 726 per 1000 and were higher than rates for adults without epilepsy in all states but one. ED visit rates were highest among Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries (vs commercial or self-pay). Adults with epilepsy were more likely to be admitted as inpatients. Visits for nervous system disorders were 6.3-8.2 times higher among people with epilepsy, and visits for mental health conditions were 1.2-2.6 times higher. Increases in ED visit rates from 2010 to 2019 among people with epilepsy exceeded increases among adults without by 6.0-27.3 percentage points.
CONCLUSIONS: Adults with epilepsy visit the ED frequently and visit rates have been increasing over time. These results underscore the importance of identifying factors contributing to ED use and designing tailored interventions to improve ambulatory care quality.

BACKGROUND: Amidst the challenges posed by Covid-19, assessing healthcare quality in India is crucial, particularly through patient satisfaction levels.
METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of 277 participants in Jammu and Kashmir was conducted, utilizing a semi-structured questionnaire and PSQ-18. Data analysis was performed using SPSS (v25) including Chi-Square tests and Descriptive analysis.
RESULTS: Out of 277 participants, 70.8% expressed high satisfaction with medical care. Majority (70%) agreed that doctors explained medical tests well. Additionally, 70% strongly agreed that their doctor\'s office was well-equipped. Dissatisfaction factors were notably low. Significant associations were found between age and alcohol use (p = 0.041), gender and alcohol use (p = 0.007), gender and tobacco use (p = 0.032), and education level and vaccination (p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights high patient satisfaction during the pandemic. Improving accessibility and quality of primary healthcare and community centres is essential to meet patient needs effectively.

OBJECTIVE: During the COVID-19 pandemic, regulatory and reimbursement policy changes provided patients improved access to neuro-oncology by telehealth. Here we discuss benefits and limitations of telehealth use in neuro-oncology. We review utilization of telemedicine services following the COVID-19 pandemic.
RESULTS: Utilization of telemedicine by neuro-oncology during the COVID-19 pandemic was 52%, compared to 27-29% for other solid tumors groups. Following the pandemic, between January 2021 and April 2024, telehealth utilization has remained high in neuro-oncology with approximately 30% of all visits completed by telemedicine, compared to 10-15% for other solid tumor groups. The striking difference between telehealth visit utilization in neuro-oncology and general medical oncology even after expiration of the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency expiration and end of pandemic-related restrictions, underscores the potential value of convenient access to care for patients with central nervous system tumors. Given widespread use of telehealth in neuro-oncology, prospective evaluation to determine the safety, usability, and acceptance of video-enabled, telehealth visits is critical. Such data may lead to broader adoption of telehealth, lead to regulatory and reimbursement reform for telehealth sustainability, and improve clinical trial access and accruals.

OBJECTIVE: Despite improvements in diabetes monitoring and treatment many patients do not achieve treatment goals. Person-centred approaches have been proposed. However, their practical implementation lags. One barrier is uncertainty about which person-reported outcomes (PROs) should be considered to add the most value. We sought to identify PROs that may be prioritised.
METHODS: We used data from a multi-stakeholder Delphi study aimed at developing a person-centred diabetes outcome set and analysed which PROs patients considered important for regular monitoring but healthcare providers less so. Linear regression analyses tested whether belonging to either stakeholder group would predict the importance attributed to an outcome.
RESULTS: We found disagreement between patients and healthcare providers on eleven PROs. Stakeholder group predicted perceived importance for ten: self-management behaviours (including performance, perceived importance, motivation, and capacity), sleep quality, diabetes symptoms, screening visit attendance, health status, lifestyle behaviours, and side effects.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that, according to patients\' preferences, self-management behaviours, health status and sleep are currently not adequately considered in diabetes management, compromising person-centred care.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that prioritising these PROs can facilitate the implementation of more person-centred diabetes monitoring which may support better-informed treatment decisions to achieve treatment goals.

BACKGROUND: Supportive care clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) facilitate the incorporation of the best available evidence into pediatric cancer care. We aimed to assess the impact of the work of the Children\'s Oncology Group (COG) Supportive Care Guideline Task Force on institutional supportive care practices.
METHODS: An online survey was distributed to representatives at 209 COG sites to assess the awareness, use, and helpfulness of COG-endorsed supportive care CPGs. Availability of institutional policies regarding 13 topics addressed by current COG-endorsed CPGs was also assessed. Respondents described their institutional processes for developing supportive care policies.
RESULTS: Representatives from 92 COG sites responded to the survey, and 78% (72/92) were \"very aware\" of the COG-endorsed supportive care CPGs. On average, sites had policies that addressed seven COG-endorsed supportive care CPG topics (median = 7, range: 0-12). Only 45% (41/92) of sites reported having institutional processes for developing supportive care policies. Of these, most (76%, 31/41) reported that the COG-endorsed CPGs have a medium or large impact on policy development. Compared with sites without processes for supportive care policy development, sites with established processes had policies on a greater number of topics aligned with current COG-endorsed CPG topics (mean = 6.6, range: 0-12 vs mean = 7.9, range: 2-12; p = 0.027).
CONCLUSIONS: Most site respondents were aware of the COG-endorsed supportive care CPGs. Less than half of the COG sites represented in the survey have processes in place to implement supportive care policies. Improvement in local implementation is required to ensure that patients at COG sites receive evidence-based supportive care.

BACKGROUND: Climate Change is causing frequent and sever extreme weather events globally, impacting human health and well-being. Primary healthcare (PHC) nurses\' are at the forefront of addressing these challenges and must be prepared.
OBJECTIVE: This scoping revieww explored literature on the preparedness of the PHC nursing workforce for extreme weather events and identify gaps in knowledge and practice.
METHODS: Using Arksey and O\'Malley\'s framework, a comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, CINHAL, Web of Sciences, and ProQuest, on studies from 2014-2024, addressing PHC nurses\' preparedness.
CONCLUSIONS: Nine studies were identified and highlighted a need for preparedness training and facility-based preparedness plans. Key themes included prioritizing regional networks, clinical leadership, service delivery, health information, health workforce, medical products and technologies, and financing.
CONCLUSIONS: Strengthening PHC nurses\' resilience against extreme weather requires targeted professional development, mental health support, comprehensive planning, and collaborative efforts. Future strategies should enhance PHC nurses\' capacity through training, support, and policy development.

Rural hospices face many obstacles in delivering palliative and end-of-life care in the United States. We aimed to identify these barriers and their potential solutions. Following a systematic approach, a comprehensive literature search using relevant keywords was conducted on online databases. Additionally, we conducted a manual search to include policy documents and white papers. Key challenges reported in the literature included limited geographic barriers and access issues, limited economic support, regulatory hindrances, and difficulty training and retaining palliative care staff. This contributes to inequitable access to hospice care in rural settings. We propose several potential solutions to overcome these hurdles and improve access. Advanced practice providers should be considered to serve as physician heads in rural hospices, which would expand resources in areas with physician shortages. A single per diem payment model should be implemented for rural hospices, regardless of the level of care provided, to help offset the higher cost of care. The Critical Access Hospital program and offering cost-based reimbursement for swing-bed stays could improve access to postacute care, including hospice services. Telehealth can improve the timeliness of care and reduce travel costs for patients and providers. Another solution to consider is simulation-based training to enhance the education of healthcare providers. In conclusion, there is a critical gap in end-of-life care access in rural communities. A multifaceted approach including policy changes, financial support, and technological innovations is essential to improve hospice care access in rural populations.

BACKGROUND: Worldwide, the culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) population is increasing, and is predicted to reach 405 million by 2050. The delivery of emergency care for the CALD population can be complex due to cultural, social, and language factors. The extent to which cultural, social, and contextual factors influence care delivery to patients from CALD backgrounds throughout their emergency care journey is unclear. Using a systematic approach, this review aims to map the existing evidence regarding emergency healthcare delivery for patients from CALD backgrounds and uses a social ecological framework to provide a broader perspective on cultural, social, and contextual influence on emergency care delivery.
METHODS: The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) scoping review methodology will be used to guide this review. The population is patients from CALD backgrounds who received care and emergency care clinicians who provided direct care. The concept is healthcare delivery to patients from CALD backgrounds. The context is emergency care. This review will include quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies published in English from January 1, 2012, onwards. Searches will be conducted in the databases of CINAHL (EBSCO), MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), SocINDEX (EBSCO), Scopus (Elsevier), and a web search of Google Scholar. A PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) flow diagram will be used to present the search decision process. All included articles will be appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Data will be presented in tabular form and accompanied by a narrative synthesis of the literature.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the increased use of emergency care service by patients from CALD backgrounds, there has been no comprehensive review of healthcare delivery to patients from CALD backgrounds in the emergency care context (ED and prehospital settings) that includes consideration of cultural, social, and contextual influences. The results of this scoping review may be used to inform future research and strategies that aim to enhance care delivery and experiences for people from CALD backgrounds who require emergency care.
BACKGROUND: This scoping review has been registered in the Open Science Framework https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/HTMKQ.

BACKGROUND: Despite the United States Preventive Services Task Force recommendation to screen adults for unhealthy alcohol use, the implementation of alcohol screening in primary care remains suboptimal.
METHODS: A pre and post-implementation study design that used Agile implementation process to increase screening for unhealthy alcohol use in adult patients from October 2021 to June 2022 at a large primary care clinic serving minority and underprivileged adults in Indianapolis.
RESULTS: In comparison to a baseline screening rate of 0%, the agile implementation process increased and sustained screening rates above 80% for alcohol use using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test - Consumption tool (AUDIT-C).
CONCLUSIONS: Using the agile implementation process, we were able to successfully implement evidence-based recommendations to screen for unhealthy alcohol use in primary care.