背景:远程医疗服务的迅速扩展,在COVID-19大流行的推动下,必须进行系统的评估以保证质量,有效性,以及美国远程医疗服务和项目的成本效益。虽然出现了许多评估框架,由各种利益相关者精心制作,他们的全面性是有限的,远程医疗评估的总体状况仍不清楚。
目的:本范围审查的总体目标是创建远程医疗评估的全面概述,纳入来自多个利益相关者类别的观点。具体来说,我们的目标是(1)绘制远程医疗评估的现有景观,(2)确定评估的关键概念,(3)综合现有的评价框架,(4)确定美国考虑的测量和评估。
方法:我们将根据JoannaBriggsInstitute(JBI)的范围审查方法和PRISMA-ScR(系统审查的首选报告项目和范围审查的Meta分析扩展)进行范围审查。此范围审查将考虑文件,包括评论,reports,和白皮书,自2019年1月1日起发布。它将侧重于美国医疗保健系统中远程医疗服务和计划的评估框架和相关测量,由远程医疗利益相关者开发,专业组织,和权威来源,不包括个体研究人员开发的那些,收集反映各自专业小组内专家的集体专门知识和共识的数据。
结果:从选定文档中提取的数据将使用表格和图形等工具进行综合。维恩图等视觉辅助工具将用于说明各种来源的评估框架之间的关系。将编制叙述性总结,以进一步描述结果如何与审查目标保持一致,促进对调查结果的全面概述。这项范围审查预计将于2024年8月结束。
结论:通过解决远程医疗评估中的关键差距,本范围审查协议为远程医疗服务和项目的全面和多利益相关方评估奠定了基础.其调查结果将告知政策制定者,卫生保健提供者,研究人员,和其他利益相关者在提高质量方面,有效性,以及美国医疗系统中远程医疗的成本效益。
背景:OSF注册osf.io/aytus;https://osf.io/aytus。
■DERR1-10.2196/55209。
BACKGROUND: The rapid expansion of telehealth services, driven by the COVID-19 pandemic, necessitates systematic evaluation to guarantee the quality, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of telehealth services and programs in the United States. While numerous evaluation frameworks have emerged, crafted by various stakeholders, their comprehensiveness is limited, and the overall state of telehealth evaluation remains unclear.
OBJECTIVE: The overarching goal of this scoping
review is to create a comprehensive overview of telehealth evaluation, incorporating perspectives from multiple stakeholder categories. Specifically, we aim to (1) map the existing landscape of telehealth evaluation, (2) identify key concepts for evaluation, (3) synthesize existing evaluation frameworks, and (4) identify measurements and assessments considered in the United States.
METHODS: We will conduct this scoping
review in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews and in line with the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews). This scoping
review will consider documents, including reviews, reports, and white papers, published since January 1, 2019. It will focus on evaluation frameworks and associated measurements of telehealth services and programs in the US health care system, developed by telehealth stakeholders, professional organizations, and authoritative sources, excluding those developed by individual researchers, to collect data that reflect the collective expertise and consensus of experts within the respective professional group.
RESULTS: The data extracted from selected documents will be synthesized using tools such as tables and figures. Visual aids like Venn diagrams will be used to illustrate the relationships between the evaluation frameworks from various sources. A narrative summary will be crafted to further describe how the results align with the
review objectives, facilitating a comprehensive overview of the findings. This scoping
review is expected to conclude by August 2024.
CONCLUSIONS: By addressing critical gaps in telehealth evaluation, this scoping review protocol lays the foundation for a comprehensive and multistakeholder assessment of telehealth services and programs. Its findings will inform policy makers, health care providers, researchers, and other stakeholders in advancing the quality, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of telehealth in the US health care system.
BACKGROUND: OSF Registries osf.io/aytus; https://osf.io/aytus.
UNASSIGNED: DERR1-10.2196/55209.