health technology assessment

卫生技术评估
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:基于结肠镜检查的监测以预防结直肠癌(CRC)给患者和医疗保健带来了巨大的负担。粪便测试可能有助于减少结肠镜检查,通过将结肠镜检查限制在患AN风险增加的个体。
    方法:这项横断面观察性研究包括50-75岁有监测指征的个体。在肠道准备之前,参与者收集样本进行多目标粪便DNA(mt-sDNA)检测和两项粪便免疫化学检测(FIT).计算所有监测适应症的测试准确性。仅用于息肉切除术后的适应症,最常见且与相对较低的CRC风险相关,使用ASCCA模型评估了以粪便为基础的监测的长期影响.模拟基于粪便的策略以调整每个测试的阳性阈值,以获得至少与结肠镜检查监测一样有效的策略。
    结果:3453名个体在所有粪便检查和结肠镜检查中均有结果。2226以前做过息肉切除术,1003以前的CRC和224家族风险。对于mt-sDNA测试,AN的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.72(95%CI;0.69-0.75),FITOC传感器为0.61(95%CI;0.58-0.64),FITFOB-Gold为0.59(95%CI;0.56-0.61)。基于粪便的息肉切除术后监测策略至少与结肠镜检查监测一样有效,结肠镜检查次数减少了15-41%,并且需要在一个人的一生中进行5.6-9.5次粪便测试。基于Mt-sDNA的监测比结肠镜检查监测更昂贵,而基于FIT的监测节省了成本。
    结论:这项研究表明,基于粪便的息肉切除术后监测策略是安全且具有成本效益的,有可能减少高达41%的结肠镜检查次数。
    OBJECTIVE: Colonoscopy-based surveillance to prevent colorectal cancer (CRC) causes substantial burden for patients and healthcare. Stool tests may help to reduce surveillance colonoscopies, by limiting colonoscopies to individuals at increased risk of AN.
    METHODS: This cross-sectional observational study included individuals aged 50-75 with surveillance indication. Before bowel preparation, participants collected samples for a multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) test and two fecal immunochemical tests (FITs). Test accuracies were calculated for all surveillance indications. Only for the post-polypectomy indication, most common and associated with a relatively low CRC risk, long-term impact of stool-based surveillance was evaluated with the ASCCA model. Stool-based strategies were simulated to tune each tests\' positivity threshold to obtain strategies at least as effective as colonoscopy surveillance.
    RESULTS: 3453 individuals had results for all stool tests and colonoscopy. 2226 had previous polypectomy, 1003 previous CRC and 224 familial risk. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for AN were 0.72 (95% CI; 0.69-0.75) for the mt-sDNA test, 0.61 (95% CI; 0.58-0.64) for the FIT OC-Sensor and 0.59 (95% CI; 0.56-0.61) for the FIT FOB-Gold. Stool-based post-polypectomy surveillance strategies at least as effective as colonoscopy surveillance, reduced the number of colonoscopies by 15-41% and required 5.6-9.5 stool tests over the lifetime of a person. Mt-sDNA-based surveillance was more costly than colonoscopy surveillance, whereas FIT-based surveillance saved costs.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that stool-based post-polypectomy surveillance strategies can be safe and cost-effective, with potential to reduce the number of colonoscopies by up to 41%.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:EPISODE研究由荷兰卫生部委托,福利和体育告知癫痫犬的报销决定。随机试验发现,癫痫犬减少癫痫发作频率并改善严重难治性癫痫(PSRE)患者的健康相关生活质量。本文研究了在荷兰将癫痫犬添加到PSRE的常规护理中的成本效益。
    方法:开发了一个微观仿真模型,使用EPISODE研究的患者水平试验数据,通过广义线性混合模型提供信息。该模型采用了10年的时间范围,并从社会角度出发。癫痫发作频率被预测为癫痫发作犬的时间的函数。患者公用事业,护理人员的效用和费用被预测为癫痫发作频率和时间的函数。
    结果:仅有癫痫犬和常规护理的PSRE的质量调整生命年(QALYs)分别估计为6.28和5.65(Δ0.63)。对于护理人员来说,估计的QALY分别为6.94和6.52(Δ0.42)。总成本分别为228,691欧元和226,261欧元(Δ2,430欧元)。干预成本在很大程度上被非正式护理和医疗保健的节省所抵消。增量成本效益比(ICER)为2,314欧元/QALY。概率敏感性分析表明,在50,000欧元/QALY阈值下,癫痫犬的成本效益为91%。在情景分析中,ICER远低于这一阈值。
    结论:癫痫犬可能是荷兰PSRE常规护理的一种具有成本效益的补充。
    OBJECTIVE: The Epilepsy Support Dog Evaluation study was commissioned by the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports to inform a reimbursement decision on seizure dogs. The randomized trial found that seizure dogs reduce seizure frequency and improve health-related quality of life of persons with severe refractory epilepsy (PSREs). This article examined the cost-effectiveness (CE) of adding seizure dogs to usual care for PSREs in The Netherlands.
    METHODS: A microsimulation model was developed, informed by generalized linear mixed models using patient-level trial data from the Epilepsy Support Dog Evaluation study. The model adopted a 10-year time horizon and took a societal perspective. Seizure frequency was predicted as a function of time with the seizure dog. Patient utilities, caregiver utilities, and costs were predicted as a function of seizure frequency and time with the seizure dog.
    RESULTS: Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of PSREs with a seizure dog and usual care alone were estimated at 6.28 and 5.65, respectively (Δ 0.63). For caregivers, estimated QALYs were 6.94 and 6.52, respectively (Δ 0.42). Total costs were respectively €228 691 and €226 261 (Δ €2430). Intervention costs were largely offset by savings in informal care and healthcare. The incremental CE ratio was €2314/QALY. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated a 91% probability of seizure dogs being cost-effective at the €50 000/QALY threshold. The incremental CE ratio fell well below this threshold in scenario analyses.
    CONCLUSIONS: Seizure dogs are likely to be a cost-effective addition to usual care for PSREs in The Netherlands.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项研究调查了患者代表如何与芬兰医疗保健选择委员会(COHERE)和药品定价委员会(PPB)一起参与药物评估和报销过程,以及当局如何看待患者组织的角色。
    方法:2021年对患者组织的代表(n=14)和社会事务和卫生部的政府官员(n=7)进行了半结构化主题个人和配对访谈。访谈数据采用定性内容分析进行分析。
    结果:患者代表对PPB和COHERE创建支持参与的咨询流程和系统模型表示赞赏。然而,有许多挑战:患者代表不确定他们的意见书如何在正式流程中得到利用,以及他们的意见在决策中是否有任何意义.患者或患者组织在评估和决策机构中缺乏代表,耐心的代表认为决策缺乏透明度。当局强调病人参与的重要性,但他们也强调,患者组织的贡献是对其他材料的补充。关于用于治疗罕见疾病的药物和研究证据有限的药物的提交被认为特别有价值。然而,提交的文件不一定会对决定产生直接影响。
    结论:访谈为PPB和COHERE参与过程的发展提供了相关的投入。访谈证实,需要提高药物评估的透明度,评估,以及芬兰的决策程序。
    BACKGROUND: This study investigated how patient representatives have experienced their involvement in medicines appraisal and reimbursement processes with the Council for Choices in Health Care in Finland (COHERE) and the Pharmaceuticals Pricing Board (PPB) and how authorities perceive the role of patient organizations\' input.
    METHODS: Semi-structured thematic individual and pair interviews were conducted in 2021 with representatives (n = 14) of patient organizations and government officials (n = 7) of the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. The interview data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.
    RESULTS: Patient representatives expressed their appreciation for the PPB and the COHERE in creating consultation processes and systematic models that support involvement. However, there were many challenges: patient representatives were uncertain about how their submissions were utilized in official processes and whether their opinions had any significance in decision-making. Patients or patient organizations lack representation in appraisal and decision-making bodies, and patient representatives felt that decision-making lacked transparency. The importance of patient involvement was highlighted by the authorities, but they also emphasized that the patient organizations\' contributions were complementary to the other materials. Submissions regarding the medications used to treat rare diseases and those with limited research evidence were considered particularly valuable. However, the submissions may not necessarily have a direct impact on decisions.
    CONCLUSIONS: The interviews provided relevant input for the development of involvement processes at the PPB and COHERE. The interviews confirmed the need for increased transparency in the medicines assessment, appraisal, and decision-making procedures in Finland.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: English Abstract
    BACKGROUND: The economic consequences of mandatory coverage, through judicial means, of high-priced medications constitutes a growing problem, which merits knowing its local characteristics to provide possible solutions.
    OBJECTIVE: To identify medications, diseases involved, economic impact and contextual factors of the judicialization of high-priced medications in the Argentine Health System(MEP).
    METHODS: Quali-quantitative descriptive study that retrospectively analyzed legal protection resources by MEP from three national and provincial databases from January 2017 to December 2020, evaluating the existing relationship between lawsuits with regulatory approval, inclusion in benefit packages and relationship with journalistic articles for the three most frequently prosecuted drugs.
    RESULTS: 405 lawsuits were included, mainly from the Ministry of National Health. The three most prosecuted medications were nusinersen (21.7%), palbociclib (5.9%) and agalsidase-alfa (4.7%). Only 69.4% of medications were approved for marketing in Argentina at the time of the protection; 45.7% were incorporated into the Single Reimbursement System, and 16.8% had a report from the National Commission for the Evaluation of Health Technologies and Clinical Excellence (CONETEC), which was negative in 87.1% of cases. The average time from request to provision of the medication was 150 days. A temporal correlation was observed between the appearance of the MEP in the national graphic press and the appeals occurrence.
    CONCLUSIONS: Judicialization focused on very highpriced medications for rare or oncological diseases. The rulings were mostly in favor of the plaintiff, and access times to the medication took a long time. The mass media anticipated the judicial processes.
    Introducción: Las consecuencias económicas de la cobertura obligatoria, vía judicial, de medicamentos de alto precio constituye un problema creciente, que amerita conocer sus características locales para aportar posibles soluciones.
    OBJECTIVE: Identificar medicamentos, enfermedades, impacto económico y factores contextuales de la judicialización de medicamentos de alto precio (MEP) Argentina. Métodos: Estudio descriptivo cuali-cuantitativo que analizó retrospectivamente recursos de amparos legales por MEP de tres bases de datos nacionales y provinciales durante 4 años, evaluando relación existente entre amparos con aprobación regulatoria, inclusión de los MEP al paquete de beneficios y relación con notas periodísticas.
    RESULTS: Se incluyeron 405 amparos provenientes principalmente del Ministerio de Salud Nacional. Los tres medicamentos más judicializados fueron nusinersen (21.7%), palbociclib (5.9%) y agalsidasa-alfa (4.7%). Solo el 69.4% de los medicamentos se encontraban aprobados para la comercialización en Argentina al momento del amparo; el 45.7% se encontraban incorporados al Sistema Único de Reintegros y el 16.8% contaban con informe de la Comisión Nacional de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias y Excelencia Clínica (CONETEC), negativa en el 87.1% de casos. El tiempo promedio desde la solicitud hasta la provisión del medicamento fue de 150 días. Se observó una correlación temporal entre la aparición del MEP en la prensa nacional gráfica y la presentación de amparos de dicho MEP.
    CONCLUSIONS: La judicialización se concentró en medicamentos de altísimo precio para enfermedades poco frecuentes u oncológicas. Los fallos fueron mayoritariamente a favor del demandante, siendo los tiempos de acceso al medicamento prolongados. Los medios de comunicación anticiparon los procesos judiciales.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们提出了一个评估制药创新价值的框架,具有明确的临床和方法学参数,基于治疗价值和健康需求。
    该研究基于文献中记录的卫生技术评估方法的适应性,应用于肿瘤药物样本。确定并解决了应用这些工具期间的困难和问题,以开发一个新的框架,该框架具有新的和经修订的领域以及每个领域的明确分类标准。根据其相关性将分数分配给每个级别和领域,以生成最终的创新性分数。
    制药创新指数(PII)包括四个领域,两个与临床和社会维度相关-治疗需求和附加治疗价值-和其他两个关于方法学特征-研究设计和质量(偏倚风险)。分配给每个领域结果之后的分数“药物的创新性指数”代表了药物创新的程度。
    这项工作提出了一种具有明确定义的标准和脚本的透明方法;使用作者\'权重和标准开发的算法可以切换到最佳调整到其他应用程序,透视或临床适应症,同时保持透明度和客观性。
    UNASSIGNED: We propose a framework to assess the value of pharmaceutical innovations, with explicit clinical and methodological parameters, based on the therapeutic value and health needs.
    UNASSIGNED: The study was based on the adaptation of health technology assessment methods documented in the literature, which was applied to a sample of oncological drugs. Difficulties and issues during the application of those tools were identified and addressed to develop a new framework with new and revised domains and clear classification criterion for each domain. Scores were assigned to each level and domain according to their relevance to generate the final score of innovativeness.
    UNASSIGNED: The Pharmaceutical Innovation Index (PII) includes four domains, two related to clinical and social dimensions - Therapeutic Need and Added Therapeutic Value - and other two about methodological features - Study Design and Quality (risk of bias). The scores combined after assigned to each domain results Index of the Innovativeness of the medicines represents the degree of pharmaceutical innovation.
    UNASSIGNED: This work proposes a transparent methodology with well-defined criteria and script; the algorithm developed with authors\' weightings and criteria may be switched to best adjust to other applications, perspective or clinical indications, while keeping the transparency and objectiveness.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:真实世界证据(RWE)可以加强健康技术评估(HTA)中的临床试验证据。
    目标:审查RWE的HTA机构(HTAbs)要求,真正的用途,和七个国家的接受度(巴西,加拿大,法国,德国,意大利,西班牙,和联合王国),并概述了可能改善RWE在功效/有效性评估和评估过程中的接受度的建议。
    方法:RWE要求是根据HTAbs指南进行总结的。HTAb的接受度是根据行业经验和案例研究进行评估的。
    结果:截至2022年6月,RWE方法学指南已在七个国家中的三个国家实施。HTAb通常要求根据本地数据源进行分析,但首选的研究设计和数据源不同。HTAbs有个人提交,评估,和评估过程;有些允许早期会议进行方案和/或结果验证,尽管很少有外部专家或医学会为评估和评价提供意见。提交的程度,评估,评估要求不一定反映接受程度。
    结论:所审查的所有国家在使用RWE方面都面临着共同的挑战。我们的建议解决了促进与行业和监管机构合作和沟通的需要,以及在整个评估和评估过程中描述RWE设计和接受标准的具体指南的需要。
    BACKGROUND: Real-world evidence (RWE) can reinforce clinical trial evidence in health technology assessment (HTA).
    OBJECTIVE: Review HTA bodies\' (HTAbs) requirements for RWE, real uses, and acceptance across seven countries (Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom) and outline recommendations that may improve acceptance of RWE in efficacy/effectiveness assessments and appraisals processes.
    METHODS: RWE requirements were summarized based on HTAbs\' guidelines. Acceptance by HTAbs was evaluated based on industry experience and case studies.
    RESULTS: As of June 2022, RWE methodological guidelines were in place in three of the seven countries. HTAbs typically requested analyses based on local data sources, but the preferred study design and data sources differed. HTAbs had individual submission, assessment, and appraisal processes; some allowed early meetings for the protocol and/or results validation, though few involved external experts or medical societies to provide input to assessment and appraisal. The extent of submission, assessment, and appraisal requirements did not necessarily reflect the degree of acceptance.
    CONCLUSIONS: All the countries reviewed face common challenges regarding the use of RWE. Our proposals address the need to facilitate collaboration and communication with industry and regulatory agencies and the need for specific guidelines describing RWE design and criteria of acceptance throughout the assessment and appraisal processes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:在法国,药品定价和报销的决定是基于国家卫生管理局(HAS)进行的评估。在评估过程中,如果证据中存在不确定性,可以通过其他数据收集来解决,则可以将其他实际证据作为“注册后研究”(PRS)。为了促进PRS规划,我们进行了回顾性探索性分析,以确定与PRS要求相关的药品的特征.
    方法:该分析涵盖了2016年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间完成的所有评估,并将评估导致PRS请求的产品与未获得PRS请求的产品进行了比较。
    结果:确定了600条积极的报销意见,17%(n=103)的病例中有PRS请求。与PRS要求相关的独立特征是轻度或中度临床获益评分,主要到中等或次要的临床附加值评分,早期访问计划下的先前可用性,和某些治疗领域(神经学,肺科,和内分泌学)。这些发现表明了两种不同的PRS要求:(i)临床益处大小存在不确定性的产品,以及(ii)预期有实质性益处但不确定性持续存在的创新产品。
    结论:这些结果将帮助健康技术开发人员更好地预测数据生成,以及时解决HAS发现的不确定性。它还可以帮助HAS和其他评估机构共同努力,根据药品的特点改进发射后证据的生成。
    OBJECTIVE: In France, decisions for pricing and reimbursement for medicinal products are based on appraisals performed by the National authority for health (Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS)). During the appraisal process, additional real-world evidence can be requested as \"Post-Registration Studies\" (PRS) when there are uncertainties in evidence that could be resolved by additional data collection. To facilitate PRS planning, a retrospective exploratory analysis was conducted to identify the characteristics of medicinal products associated with a PRS request.
    METHODS: This analysis encompassed all appraisals finalized between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2021 and compared products for which the appraisal led to a PRS request with those that did not.
    RESULTS: Six hundred positive opinions for reimbursement were identified, with a PRS request present in 17 percent (n = 103) of cases. The independent characteristics associated with a PRS request were a mild or moderate clinical benefit score, a major to moderate or minor clinical added value score, previous availability under an early access program, and certain therapeutic areas (neurology, pulmonology, and endocrinology). These findings suggest two different profiles of PRS requests: (i) products for which there is uncertainty in the size of the clinical benefit and (ii) innovative products for which a substantial benefit is expected but uncertainties persist.
    CONCLUSIONS: These results will assist health technology developers to better anticipate data generation to promptly address uncertainties identified by HAS. It may also help HAS and other assessment agencies to work together to improve postlaunch evidence generation according to the characteristics of the medicinal products.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    高成本药物的引入通常在实现药物保险的成本效益方面构成挑战。合并这些药物的未来降价可能会提高其成本效益。我们研究了国家保险公司同等药品定价(EPED)政策规定的未来成本降低对dupilumab成本效益的影响,韩国医疗系统中中重度特应性皮炎的生物药物。我们进行了一项政策模拟研究,使用dupilumab联合支持治疗(SC)与单独SC的半马尔可夫成本效用分析,有和没有EPED政策调整。在10.3年内进入生物仿制药之后,EPED将把dupilumab的价格降至70%。情景分析量化了改变时间对EPED的影响,化学与生物名称,响应标准,贴现率,以及在有和没有EPED调整的情况下,增量成本效益比(ICER)和可接受性的时间范围。dupilumab未来价格的EPED调整显著提高了其成本效益,ICER下降9.7%,可接受性大幅增加14.6%。假设5年内EPED,ICER低于预定义的支付意愿阈值。如果dupilumab是一种化学药物,EPED调整显示可接受性增加19.1%。通过EPED系统将未来的成本降低纳入经济评估是至关重要的,特别是对于即将进入仿制药的药物。这项研究强调了EPED调整在创新药物成本效益分析中的重要性,尤其是那些接近支付意愿门槛的人。
    The introduction of high-cost medications often poses challenges in achieving cost-effectiveness for drug insurance coverage. Incorporating future price reductions for these medications may enhance their cost-effectiveness. We examined the influence of future cost reductions mandated by the national insurer\'s equal pricing for equivalent drugs (EPED) policy on the cost-effectiveness of dupilumab, a biologic drug for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis in the Korean healthcare system. We conducted a policy simulation study using semi-Markovian cost utility analysis of dupilumab in combination with supportive care (SC) versus SC alone, with and without the EPED policy adjustment. The EPED would lower dupilumab\'s price to 70% following the entry of a biosimilar drug in 10.3 years. Scenario analyses quantified the impact of changing time to the EPED, chemical versus biological designation, response criteria, discount rates, and time horizons on the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) and acceptability with and without EPED adjustment. The EPED adjustment of dupilumab\'s future price significantly improved its cost-effectiveness, with a 9.7% decrease in ICER and a substantial 14.6% increase in acceptability. Assuming EPED in 5 years, the ICER fell below the predefined willingness-to-pay threshold. If dupilumab were a chemical drug, EPED adjustment demonstrated a 19.1% increase in acceptability. Incorporating future cost reductions via the EPED system in economic evaluations is crucial, especially for drugs facing imminent generic entry. This study underscores the importance of EPED adjustment in the cost-effectiveness analysis of innovative medications, especially for those nearing willingness-to-pay thresholds.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们比较了临床和经济评论研究所(ICER)的比较临床有效性评级与德国联邦联合委员会(G-BA)的附加收益评级,并探讨了哪些因素可以解释两个组织之间的分歧。
    方法:我们将药物纳入了ICER在其2020-2023年价值评估框架下进行的评估,并由G-BA于2024年1月对同一适应症进行了相应评估,患者群体,和比较药物。为了比较评估,我们修改了ICER提议的G-BA和ICER福利评级之间的人行横道,以考虑G-BA的确定性评级。我们还确定了每一对是否基于类似的证据。尽管证据基础相似,但基于改良的人行横道表现出分歧的评估对进行了定性分析,以确定分歧的原因。
    结果:在适应症匹配的15个药物评估对中,患者亚组,和比较器,在基于类似证据的评估中,没有人表示同意。分歧归因于证据评估的差异,包括安全性评估,概括性,和研究设计,以及G-BA在四种情况下拒绝了现有证据,认为不合适。
    结论:研究结果表明,即使在人群和比较者相同的条件下,证据基础是一致的,不同的评估者可能会对比较有效性得出不同的结论,因此强调了在临床有效性评估中存在价值判断。支持旨在促进国家间价值评估交换的倡议,这些价值判断应始终透明地呈现,并在评估摘要中证明其合理性。
    OBJECTIVE: We compared the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review\'s (ICER) ratings of comparative clinical effectiveness with the German Federal Joint Committee\'s (G-BA) added benefit ratings, and explored what factors may explain the disagreement between the 2 organizations.
    METHODS: We included drugs if they were assessed by ICER under its 2020 to 2023 Value Assessment Framework and had a corresponding assessment by G-BA as of January 2024 for the same indication, patient population, and comparator drug. To compare assessments, we modified ICER\'s proposed crosswalk between G-BA and ICER benefit ratings to account for G-BA\'s certainty ratings. We also determined whether each pair was based on similar evidence. Assessment pairs exhibiting disagreement based on the modified crosswalk despite a similar evidence base were qualitatively analyzed to identify reasons for disagreement.
    RESULTS: Out of 15 drug assessment pairs matched on indication, patient subgroup, and comparator, none showed agreement in their assessments when based on similar evidence. Disagreement was attributed to differences in evidence evaluation, including evaluations of safety, generalizability, and study design, as well as G-BA\'s rejection of the available evidence in 4 cases as unsuitable.
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings demonstrate that even under conditions where populations and comparators are identical and the evidence base is consistent, different assessors may arrive at divergent conclusions about comparative effectiveness, thus underscoring the presence of value judgments within assessments of clinical effectiveness. To support initiatives that seek to facilitate the exchange of value assessments between countries, these value judgments should always be transparently presented and justified in assessment summaries.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号