glottic cancer

声门癌
  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    目的:评估经口激光显微手术(TLM)联合磷酸钛氧钾(KTP)激光消融治疗声门肿瘤的安全性和临床有效性。
    方法:通过PubMed的MEDLINE,Scopus,WebofScience,科克伦图书馆
    方法:评估KTP激光治疗早期声门肿瘤患者的安全性和有效性的研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
    结果:纳入了8项研究。经过平均3.3年的随访,接受KTP的患者的总生存率和无病生存率分别为90.7%(95%CI85%-96.5%)和98.5%(95%CI97.3%-99.8%),分别。在单臂荟萃分析中,复发的汇总估计值为7.7%(95%CI3.4%-12%).单臂荟萃分析中归因于KTP的总体语音障碍指数(VHI)估计值在6个月内和一年随访后分别为6.76(95%CI[3.05,10.48])和5.21(95%CI[2.86,7.56])。分别。
    结论:KTP激光消融治疗早期声门型肿瘤是一种安全有效的方法。喉镜,2023年。
    To evaluate the safety and clinical effectiveness of transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) with potassium-titanyl-phosphate (KTP) laser ablation for glottic neoplasms.
    MEDLINE via PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library.
    A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies assessing the safety and efficacy of KTP laser therapy in patients with early-stage glottic neoplasms.
    Eight studies were included. After an average follow-up of 3.3 years, the overall survival and disease-free survival for patients who underwent KTP were 90.7% (95% CI 85%-96.5%) and 98.5% (95% CI 97.3%-99.8%), respectively. In the single-arm meta-analysis, the pooled estimate of recurrence was 7.7% (95% CI 3.4%-12%). The overall voice handicap index (VHI) estimate attributed to KTP in the single-arm meta-analysis was 6.76 (95% CI [3.05, 10.48]) and 5.21 (95% CI [2.86, 7.56]) within 6 months and after a one-year follow-up, respectively.
    KTP laser ablation is a safe and effective method for treating patients with early glottic neoplasms. Laryngoscope, 133:1806-1814, 2023.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Introduction  Transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) is the treatment of choice for Tis-T2 squamous cell glottic carcinomas due to its advantages compared with open surgery and radiotherapy. However, the CO 2 laser beam causes changes and damage on the specimens, making the histological assessment of resection margins, the gold standard for confirming radical tumor resection, sometimes difficult. Objective  To assess the different ways to manage patients depending on the status of the histopathological margin according to recent studies to detect the most commonly shared therapeutic strategy. Data Synthesis  We analyzed the literature available on the PubMed and Web of Science databases, including only articles published since 2005, using specific keywords to retrieve articles whose titles and abstracts were read and analyzed independently by two authors to detect relevant studies. Therefore, we focused on disease-free survival, overall survival, local control, laryngeal preservation, and disease-specific survival. Thus, 17 studies were included in the present review; they were grouped according to the status of the histological margin, and we analyzed the different management policies described in them. This analysis showed that there is not a shared strategy, though in most studies the authors performed a second-look surgery in the cases of positive margins and a close follow-up in cases of negative ones. The main disagreement is regarding the management of close or non-valuable resection margins, since some some authors performed a second-look surgery, and others, a close follow-up. Conclusions  Definitely, the most shared policy is the second-look surgery in case of positive surgical margins, and a close follow-up in case of close or non-valuable resection margins. Key Points To date, TLM is the treatment of choice for Tis-T2 squamous cell glottic carcinomas. The CO 2 laser beam could impair the histological assessment of the resection margins, which is the gold standard to confirm radical tumor resection. Second-look TLM is the most performed strategy in case of positive surgical margins.Close follow-up is the most shared policy in case of close or non-valuable resection margins.In cases of negative resection margins, follow-up represents the best approach.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    To perform a systematic review of 1762 patients to comprehensively assess the benefit of altered-fractionation radiotherapy (ART) in early stage glottic carcinoma (ESGC).
    Studies were identified in PubMed and EMBASE. Inclusion criteria were: (1) diagnosis of squamous cell ESGC (Tis, T1, T2); (2) ART versus conventionally-fractionationated radiotherapy (CRT); and (3) provision of number of local recurrence events and total numbers per fractionation arm. The random-effects model was fitted to estimate the pooled hazard ratio (HR). Subgroup sensitivity analyses were performed based on ART strategy (hypo- versus hyperfractionation), treatment-day reductions, machine type, tumor stage, and anterior commissure involvement.
    Eleven studies met inclusion criteria: 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 7 two-arm retrospective studies. ART was associated with 38% fewer (HR 0.62; 95% CI: 0.46-0.82, p = 0.0009) and 60% fewer (HR 0.40; 95% CI: 0.24-0.66, p = 0.0003) local failure events in pooled analyses of the RCTs and retrospective studies, respectively. Both hyperfractionation (HR 0.65; 95% CI: 0.43-0.97, p = 0.03) and hypofractionation (HR 0.55; 95% CI: 0.33-0.91, p = 0.02) strategies were superior to CRT. The benefit persisted for all treatment- and tumor-related parameters, including anterior commissure involvement, with the exception of a pooled analysis of studies with predominantly T2 (<50% T1) cases (HR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.30-1.20, p = 0.15).
    Both hypofractionation and hyperfractionation improve local control in ESGC, including T1 tumors and for anterior commissure involvement. However, this benefit may not persist for T2 tumors, for which alternative strategies should be considered.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这篇文章是“你知道你的指导方针”系列的延续,美国头颈学会教育委员会的一项倡议,旨在提高对当前与头颈癌有关的最佳实践的认识。国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)指南对声门喉癌的主要和辅助治疗进行了系统的审查。
    This article is a continuation of the \"Do You Know Your Guidelines\" series, an initiative of the American Head and Neck Society\'s Education Committee to increase awareness of current best practices pertaining to head and neck cancer. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for primary and adjuvant treatment of cancer of the glottic larynx are reviewed here in a systematic fashion according to stage.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号