OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the role and reliability of the free medial femoral condyle (MFC) flap (MFCF) in demanding foot and ankle reconstruction procedures.
METHODS: A search of the MEDLINE, PubMed, and Embase electronic databases was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines between January 2008 and September 2023. Articles concerning free MFC bone flaps for reconstruction of the foot and ankle regions were included. Outcomes of interest included flap failure, complications, union rate, time to union, and functional scores.
RESULTS: Twenty studies involving 131 patients met the inclusion criteria. The most common clinical indications for the free MFCF were nonunion, avascular necrosis, and osteomyelitis. The most common sites of nonunion were tibiotalar arthrodesis (50%) and subtalar arthrodesis (33%). Overall, the bony union rate was 93.1%, with a mean time to union of 14.6±0.1 weeks. There were no flap failures reported. Postoperative complications were observed in 39 (29.7%) cases (e.g., delayed donor site wound healing, flap debulking, medial condyle osteonecrosis, and donor site numbness), with 21 (16%) patients requiring further operative intervention. No major donor or recipient site morbidity occurred, except for one case.
CONCLUSIONS: Free MFCFs offer a versatile and dependable choice for cases of foot and ankle reconstruction, displaying favorable rates of bone fusion and acceptable complication rates. Existing literature indicates that MFC reconstruction in the foot and ankle is not associated with significant morbidity at the donor or recipient sites. The pooled data demonstrated a 93% success rate in achieving bone fusion in the foot and ankle region, supporting the view that it can be considered another option of treatment.

The osteocutaneous radial forearm (OCRFF) is a versatile free flap option for bony defects of the head and neck, given the thinness and pliability of the forearm cutaneous paddle, pedicle length, reliability, lack of atherosclerosis, and functional concerns common to other osseous donor sites. The OCRFF was once associated with a high risk of radial fracture, in addition to concerns about the quality and durability of bone stock for osseous reconstruction, particularly for the mandible. Following the introduction of prophylactic plating of the radius, the incidence of symptomatic radial fracture has drastically decreased. Furthermore, modifications of the bony osteotomies and other evolutions of this flap harvest have increased the use of the OCRFF throughout the head and neck. Despite these advantages, the OCRFF is not widely utilized by microvascular reconstructive surgeons due to perceived limitations and risks. Herein, we present a multidisciplinary, contemporary review of the harvest technique, outcomes, and perioperative management for the OCRFF.

OBJECTIVE: The superficial temporal artery (STA) and facial artery (FA) are two commonly used recipient vessels when performing free tissue transfer to the head and neck. This meta-analysis compares the impact of recipient vessel location on free flap outcomes in scalp reconstruction.
METHODS: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA-P guidelines using six databases. Studies reporting free tissue transfer using the STA or FA as a recipient vessel for reconstructing scalp defects were included. Outcomes of interest included flap loss, partial flap necrosis, wound dehiscence, venous thrombosis, and infection rates. Quality evaluation was performed using ASPS criteria and the ROBINS-I tool.
RESULTS: Of 3270 identified articles, 12 were included for final analysis. In total, 125 free flaps were identified (75 STA, 50 FA). Pooled analysis demonstrated an overall flap survival rate of 98.4% (STA 98.7% vs. FA 98.0%; p = .782). The mean defect size was significantly greater for flaps using the STA compared with the FA (223.7 ± 119.4 cm2 vs. 157.1 ± 96.5 cm2, p = .001). The FA group had a higher incidence of wound dehiscence than the STA group (14.0% vs. 1.3%, p = .005). However, meta-analysis demonstrated no significant difference in rates of wound dehiscence, flap loss, partial flap necrosis, venous congestion, or postoperative infection between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to assess recipient vessel selection in scalp reconstruction. Our results do not support a single vessel as the superior choice in scalp reconstruction. Rather, these findings suggest that the decision between using the STA or FA is multifaceted, requiring a flexible approach that considers the individual characteristics of each case. Further research is needed to explore additional factors influencing recipient vessel selection, including defect location, radiation therapy, and prior head and neck surgery.

Fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap has been widely used for oncologic bony reconstruction of both the mandible and maxilla. Early and late morbidities of the donor side such as leg weakness, ankle instability, limited ankle mobility, tibial stress fractures or incision area pain are well documented; however, there is a lack of information about the effects of fibula grafting on patient quality of life. To address this issue, a scoping literature search in the PubMed electronic database was performed to identify all relevant studies and reviews in the period between 2010 and 2022. The potential discomforts after free fibula grafting and their impact on different domains of everyday living were identified and evaluated. The present literature review indicates that donor site morbidity can negatively impact patients\' quality of life, albeit generally classified as minor. However, the functional and aesthetic benefits of oromandibular reconstruction clearly outweigh the associated sequelae. Nevertheless, the authors of this review highlight the importance of a comprehensive clinical evaluation of the donor site besides the recipient site during follow-up examinations. This would help to subjectively evaluate the functional and esthetical limitations of a patient\'s site and promptly detect morbidities that could lead to long-term complications.

Congenital pseudarthrosis of the forearm bones (CPFBs) is rare, with only 106 reported cases, and is frequently associated with neurofibromatosis (NF). Approximately 5% of patients with NF develop pseudarthrosis, and 50% of patients with pseudarthrosis have NF. Achieving bone union is difficult in congenital pseudarthrosis. Many methods have been attempted, including casting, internal fixation with or without grafting, and electrical stimulation, but failure is frequent. Free vascularized fibular flaps (FVFs) have been used to bridge long bone defects since 1975 and in tibial pseudarthrosis since 1979. In CPFB, FVF is more successful than other methods in achieving union and is the current treatment of choice. Here, we presented three cases of forearm pseudarthrosis treated with FVF, reviewed the literature on CPFB, and discussed some technical aspects of FVF treatment. Three cases of congenital pseudoarthrosis were treated with free fibula flaps, diagnosed at ages of 7 years (ulna), 15 months (radius), and 9 years (radius and ulna). Two flaps were stabilized with intramedullary wires and latterly, one with compression plates. One persistent nonunion received revision nonvascularized bone grafting and plating. All patients achieved union by 11 months after index surgery. Reconstruction with vascularized fibula is the treatment of choice because it offers the highest published union rates and good functional results. Complete resection of the affected bone and stable fixation, latterly with compression plates are critical to success. Surgery is technically demanding, and complications are common. Secondary surgery may be required, but outcomes are favorable. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative delirium is a severe complication of flap transplantation surgery, adversely affecting surgical prognoses. The intricate pathophysiology of postoperative delirium renders the elucidation of its risk factors challenging. This research aims to delineate the prevalence and the specific risk factors of postoperative delirium in patients with cancer undergoing free flap reconstruction through a systematic review and meta-analysis to enlighten proactive prevention measures.
METHODS: The researchers systematically queried both the international and Chinese databases. Searches were performed for publications from inception until September 14, 2023, using the terms \"free tissue flaps,\" \"delirium,\" \"neoplasms,\" and \"risk factors.\" Data synthesis and statistical analysis were conducted using Stata SE (version 15.0) to calculate the combined effect size for identified risk factors. Reported outcomes included weighted mean differences or odds ratios with their respective 95% confidence intervals.
RESULTS: Twelve case-control studies were included (ntotal = 3,256). Among them, 515 patients developed postoperative delirium after free flap surgery, compared with 2,741 patients who did not. The outcomes suggest that the risk factors include but are not limited to age, male, late neoplasm staging, use of hypnotic or antipsychotic, history of background diseases, psychiatric review, tracheotomy, and impaired wound healing. In contrast, early neoplasm staging and others are the protective factors with statistical significance. Multivariate analysis further identified significant correlations between preoperative albumin, perioperative blood transfusion, sleep disturbance, postoperative visual analog scale, postoperative albumin, smoking, and the appearance of postoperative delirium.
CONCLUSIONS: The determined risk factors were grouped into preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative categories substantiated by current data to present instructions for postoperative delirium prevention.

BACKGROUND: Different factors can affect the quality of life of patients treated for head and neck cancer undergoing major surgical intervention. However, it remains unclear which specific factors and what possible interventions could have the greatest influence on quality of life postoperatively for patients undergoing surgical resection with free flap reconstruction. The objective of our systematic review was to identify which factors, at the time of surgical treatment, are associated with a worse postoperative quality of life for patients undergoing surgical resection with free flap reconstruction for head and neck cancer.
METHODS: We performed a systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), from their inception through November 2021. We included peer reviewed studies that evaluated the impact of specific factors on quality of life for adult patients who underwent surgery with free flap reconstruction for head and neck cancer. Two reviewers independently screened citations for eligibility and extracted data. Risk of bias of each study was evaluated using the New-Castle Ottawa Scale. Vote counting and qualitative review were used to synthesize results. All relevant findings were reported.
RESULTS: We initially identified 1971 articles. We included 22 articles in our systematic review, totaling 1398 patients. There was a high level of variability for factors evaluated throughout studies and many studies presented small sample sizes. However, some factors were associated with worse long-term quality of life, including older age, radiotherapy, higher tumor stage, dysphagia, anxiety as well as depressive symptoms. Very few articles analyzed their data for specific tumor subsites and the impact of psychosocial factors was rarely evaluated throughout studies.
CONCLUSIONS: For patients with head and neck cancer requiring free flap reconstruction, some specific factors may correlate with changes in quality of life. However, these findings are based on very few and mostly underpowered studies. A better understanding of factors affecting quality of life could allow a more personalized and overall better quality of care for patients.

BACKGROUND: The scapular free flap (SFF) is essential in complex reconstructive surgery and often indicated in complex defects with compromised or poor local tissue integrity. This review aims to assess the versatility and reliability of the SFF during reconstruction.
METHODS: A comprehensive literature review of multiple databases was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. An analysis of pooled data was performed to evaluate flap failure rate for any anatomical unit using SFF as the primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints included other complication rates after reconstruction such as partial flap loss, revision surgery, fistula, hematoma, and infection.
RESULTS: A total of 110 articles were included, with 1447 pooled flaps. The main recipient site was the head and neck region (89.0%). Major indications for reconstruction were malignancy (55.3%), burns (19.2%), and trauma (9.3%). The most common types of flaps were osteocutaneous (23.3%), cutaneous (22.6%), and chimeric (18.0%). The pooled flap failure rate was 2% (95%CI: 1%-4%). No significant heterogeneity was present across studies (Q statistic 20.2, p = .69; I2 .00%, p = .685). Nonscapular supplementary flaps and grafts were required in 61 cases. The average length and surface area of bone flaps were 7.2 cm and 24.8cm2, respectively. The average skin paddle area was 134.2cm2.
CONCLUSIONS: The SFF is a useful adjunct in the reconstructive surgeon\'s armamentarium as evidence by its intrinsic versatility and diverse clinical indications. Our data suggest a low failure rate in multicomponent defect reconstruction, especially in head and neck surgery. SFFs enable incorporation of multiple tissue types and customizable dimensions-both for vascularized bone and cutaneous skin-augmenting its value in the microsurgeon\'s repertoire as a chimeric flap. Further research is necessary to overcome the conventional barriers to SFF utilization and to better comprehend the specific scenarios in which the SFF can serve as the preferred alternative workhorse flap.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the postoperative complications of the fibular free flap (FFF), scapula free flap (SFF), and osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap (OCRFFF) following osseous reconstruction in the head and neck.
METHODS: PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane.
METHODS: A literature search and systematic review were performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines. A meta-analysis of proportions was conducted using a random effects model to compare operative time and postoperative complications.
RESULTS: The systematic review identified 26 studies comparing at least 1 variable of interest. The odds ratio estimates favored reduced rates of flap failure with the OCRFFF when compared to FFF (0.7, confidence interval [CI]: 0.29-1.11, P < .001), while FFF and SFF were similar. The mean difference estimates for operative time significantly favored FFF over SFF (-51.04 minutes, CI: -92.73 to -9.35, P = .016) and OCRFFF over FFF (66.77 minutes, CI: 52.74-80.8, P < .001). The FFF was more prone to hardware exposure, longer hospital stays, and donor site complications. Recipient wound complications and fistula rates were similar for all flap types.
CONCLUSIONS: Depending on the clinical context, the OCRFFF, FFF, and SFF are all robust options for reconstruction in the head and neck. The OCRFFF is associated with a reduced rate of flap failure and shorter operative times. The SFF requires longer operative times, although significant variation was observed between institutions. The FFF has broad reconstructive indications but is associated with more perioperative and long-term complications.

BACKGROUND: Vascularized free tissue transfer has been established as an effective method in the reconstruction of mandibular defects. However, a limited understanding of its efficacy in pediatric patients persists due to its infrequent presentation. The aim of this study is to systematically consolidate the survival and infection rates of free flaps in pediatric mandibular reconstruction.
METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted on Ovid Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library for studies published up to January 2024. We included peer-reviewed studies reporting on survival and infection outcomes associated with free flap mandibular reconstruction in pediatric patients (<18 years). We performed a random-effects meta-analysis with the inverse-variance weighted approach to estimate survival and infection rates. Heterogeneity was assessed by I2, and publication bias was examined using Egger\'s test.
RESULTS: A total of 26 studies, reporting on 463 free flaps and 439 pediatric patients with a mean age of 10.7 years, were included in our study. Most free flaps originated from the fibula (n = 392/463, 84.7%) and benign tumors were the most common cause for mandibular reconstruction (n = 179/463, 38.7%). The pooled estimate for survival of flaps was 96% (95% CI: 93-97, I2 = 0%), and recipient-site infections were estimated to occur in 9% (95% CI: 6-13, I2 = 0%) of cases. The most common reported complications within the study timeframe were early malocclusion (n = 28/123, 21.4%) and bite abnormalities (18/131, 13.7%).
CONCLUSIONS: Free tissue transfer for mandibular reconstruction in pediatric patients is effective and safe. Further research is required to explore functionality following mandibular reconstruction in diverse pediatric populations.