follicular unit transplantation

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们的目的是确定各种可用的口服,topic,以及雄激素性脱发患者脱发的程序性治疗选择。使用系统审查和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目,对国家医学图书馆进行了系统评价.总的来说,141项独特研究符合我们的纳入标准。我们证明了许多非处方药(例如局部米诺地尔,补充剂,低水平光处理),处方(例如口服米诺地尔,非那雄胺,dutasteride),和程序(例如富血小板血浆,分馏激光器,毛发移植)治疗成功促进毛发生长,强调多方面和个性化管理方法的优越性。
    We aimed to determine the efficacy of the various available oral, topical, and procedural treatment options for hair loss in individuals with androgenic alopecia. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic review of the National Library of Medicine was performed. Overall, 141 unique studies met our inclusion criteria. We demonstrate that many over the counter (e.g. topical minoxidil, supplements, low-level light treatment), prescription (e.g. oral minoxidil, finasteride, dutasteride), and procedural (e.g. platelet-rich plasma, fractionated lasers, hair transplantation) treatments successfully promote hair growth, highlighting the superiority of a multifaceted and individualized approach to management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:调查两种移植方法在女性FHL中管理CLs的结果。
    背景:本研究旨在调查两种移植方法在女性额叶发际线中管理牛舔(CLs)的结果。
    方法:根据移植方法将患者分为两组:与原始毛发方向匹配(MOD)组和与CL毛发方向匹配(MCD)组。比较两组的满意度评分。
    结果:在80例患者中,77个有一个单CL,3个有一个双CL。在MOD组,12例患者中有7例(58.3%)接受了密度增强的修补程序,平均为123个卵泡单位;患者和医师的平均满意度分别为4.84和4.60。在MCD组中,68例患者中有7例(10.3%)接受了CL周围密度增强的修补程序;患者和医师的平均满意度分别为4.64和4.50。
    结论:在女性发际线矫正手术中,外科医生必须通过考虑位置在MOD和MCD之间进行选择,形状,和CL的模式;面部形状;以及患者的偏好。需要精细的移植物放置才能获得自然的结果。
    方法:本期刊要求作者为每篇文章分配一定程度的证据。对于这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者说明。www.springer.com/00266.
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the results of two grafting methods to manage CLs in the FHL of women.
    BACKGROUND: The present study was performed to investigate the results of two grafting methods to manage cowlicks (CLs) in the frontal hairline of women.
    METHODS: Patients were categorized into two groups based on the grafting method: the matching with the original hair direction (MOD) group and the matching with the CL hair direction (MCD) group. Satisfaction ratings were compared between the two groups.
    RESULTS: Among 80 patients, 77 had a single CL and 3 had a double CL. In the MOD group, 7 of 12 (58.3%) patients underwent a touch-up procedure for density enhancement with an average of 123 follicular units; the average patient and physician satisfaction ratings were 4.84 and 4.60, respectively. In the MCD group, 7 of 68 (10.3%) patients underwent a touch-up procedure for density enhancement around the CL; the average patient and physician satisfaction ratings were 4.64 and 4.50, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: In female hairline correction surgery, the surgeon must choose between MOD and MCD by considering the location, shape, and pattern of the CL; the facial shape; and the patient\'s preference. Delicate graft placement is required to obtain natural-looking results.
    METHODS: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors. www.springer.com/00266 .
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:长毛囊单位切除(LHF)越来越受欢迎,特别是对于发际线的恢复,因为它有助于避免在供体区域脱毛,并提供更好的术后即时结果。
    目的:本研究旨在评估LHF用于发际线修复的术后临床结果。
    方法:分析了2018年9月至2022年6月接受LHF发际线恢复的248例患者(223名女性和25名男性)的数据,术后立即随访9个月。评估长毛移植物的并发症和生存率。使用5点Likert量表评估患者术后满意度。通用生活质量量表-74(GQOLI-74)评估了术后生活质量。
    结果:计划提取密度设定为15-25FU/cm2。提取的毛发移植物总数的平均数,提取区的横切率,提取时间为1970±124FU,3.9±0.2%,和3.2±0.8小时,分别。将发丝植入密度设定为50-70FU/cm2。平均植发总数为2031±371FU;植入时间为3.8±1.9h。术后7天内无严重并发症发生。术后9个月平均移植物存活率为93.1±1.3%。所有患者均对术后即刻效果满意,大多数患者对9个月结局感到满意(平均总满意度得分为4.7分).身体机能的分数,心理功能,术后社会功能和物质生活功能均高于术前(p<0.0001)。
    结论:Hairline修复LHF可以提高美容效果,并在临床实践中广泛使用。
    BACKGROUND: Long-hair follicular unit excision (LHF) is gaining popularity, especially for hairline restoration, because it helps avoid hair removal in the donor area and provides better immediate postoperative results.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the postoperative clinical outcomes of LHF for hairline restoration.
    METHODS: Data from 248 patients (223 women and 25 men) who underwent hairline restoration with LHF between September 2018 and June 2022 were analyzed, and they were followed up immediately and 9 months postoperatively. The complications and survival rate of long-hair grafts were assessed. Patient postoperative satisfaction was assessed using a 5-Point Likert Scale. The Generic Quality of Life Inventory-74 (GQOLI-74) assessed the quality of the postoperative life.
    RESULTS: The planned extraction density was set at 15-25 FU/cm2. The mean number of total extracted hair grafts, transection rate in the extraction area, and extraction time were 1970 ± 124 FU, 3.9 ± 0.2%, and 3.2 ± 0.8 h, respectively. The hairline implantation density was set at 50-70 FU/cm2. The mean number of total transplanted hair grafts was 2031 ± 371 FU; the implant time was 3.8 ± 1.9 h. No serious complications occurred within 7 days postoperatively. The mean graft survival rate was 93.1 ± 1.3% at 9 months postoperatively. All patients were satisfied with the immediate postoperative results, and most were satisfied with the 9-month outcomes (mean overall satisfaction score: 4.7). The scores of physical function, psychological function, social function and material life function after operation were higher than those before operation (p < 0.0001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Hairline restoration with LHF could enhance the cosmetic outcomes and be widely used in clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Review
    自1960年代以来,随着技术和外科技术的进步,头发移植已成为一种实践。随着各种手术技术的存在,患者和医生有丰富的选择来为患者策划最好的结果。然而,有许多选择带来了各种好处和后果,必须逐个患者进行检查。这篇综述文章试图研究头发移植的各种手术方式,概述各种技术的利弊,并帮助概述选择给定手术技术时的注意事项。
    Hair transplantation has evolved as a practice since the 1960\'s with advances in technology and surgical technique. With various surgical techniques in existence, patients and practitioners have an abundance of options to curate the best results for the patient. However, with many options come various benefits and consequences that must be examined on a patient-by-patient basis. This review article sought to examine the various surgical modalities of hair transplantation, to outline the pros and cons of various techniques, and to help outline considerations when choosing a given surgical technique.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    OBJECTIVE: Microsurgical autologous hair transplantation, when performed as follicular unit transplantation, may permanently and naturally improve advanced androgenetic alopecia in men and women and also non-active scarring alopecias.
    RESULTS: Sufficient donor hair and realistic patient expectations as well as an individual surgical planning of the hair distribution are crucial prerequisites for a sustainable hair restoration. They should be determined and evaluated during a personal pre-examination and consultation with the hair surgeon. Natural results can be achieved by transplanting up to several thousands of follicular units with high densities into small micro-slits. This technique also allows for increasing the hair density without injuring surrounding original pre-existing hairs. In progressive, early or advanced androgenetic alopecia, additional medical therapy is highly recommended to stabilize the condition. Otherwise, depending on supply and demand of donor hair, only a partial hair restoration can be achieved with a satisfying density.
    CONCLUSIONS: Since hair transplantation requires a precise sequence of surgical steps and careful handling of the tiny grafts, the skills and experience of the hair surgeon and his or her team are crucial. The medical risks of an assembly-line way of performing this surgery by non-licensed, non-physician staff, as reported from national clinics and medical tourism, should not be underestimated. The German Association of Hair Surgeons and the International Society of Hair Restoration Surgery offer patient information, as well as continuous medical education and guidelines for interested physicians to ensure the highest quality standard of care.
    UNASSIGNED: HINTERGRUND UND ZIELE: Die mikrochirurgische autologe Haartransplantation als Follicular-Unit-Transplantation ermöglicht eine dauerhafte, natürlich aussehende Verbesserung bei androgenetischer Alopezie von Mann und Frau sowie Kopfhautnarben.
    UNASSIGNED: Voraussetzungen sind ausreichend patienteneigene Spenderhaare und realistische Patientenerwartungen sowie eine individuelle und persönliche Planung der Verteilung der Transplantate für eine nachhaltige Haarwiederherstellung. Eine ärztliche Voruntersuchung und Aufklärung sind dazu unerlässlich. Durch Verpflanzung von bis zu mehreren tausend Follikeleinheiten in hoher Dichte in passgerechte Mikroschlitze sind sehr natürliche Ergebnisse erreichbar, auch eine Verdichtung ohne Verletzung bestehender Haare ist so möglich. Bei progredienter bzw. ausgeprägter androgenetischer Alopezie ist eine zusätzliche medikamentöse Stabilisierung empfehlenswert, da ansonsten – je nach Spenderhaarmenge – nur Teilrekonstruktionen in zufriedenstellender Dichte möglich sein können.
    CONCLUSIONS: Da die Haartransplantation eine präzise Planung und zügige Abfolge einzelner Schritte bei schonender Handhabung der winzigen lebenden Grafts erfordert, sind die Erfahrung und Übung von Haarchirurg/in und festem Team entscheidend. Die medizinischen Risiken bei fließbandähnlicher Durchführung operativer Tätigkeiten durch nichtärztliches, unerfahrenes Personal, wovon leider im In- und Ausland zunehmend berichtet wird, sind nicht zu unterschätzen. Der Verband deutscher Haarchirurgen (VDHC) und die internationale Dachgesellschaft International Society of Hair Restoration Surgery (ISHRS) bieten seriöse Informationen für Patienten und Leitlinien sowie Fortbildungen zur Sicherung der Qualitätsstandards für interessierte Ärzte.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:瘢痕性脱发可显著影响儿童的情绪。毛囊单位切除(FUE)和毛囊单位移植(FUT)已用于瘢痕治疗。
    目的:本研究旨在评估毛囊单位毛发移植治疗儿童瘢痕性脱发的安全性和可行性。
    方法:共有9名儿童(7名男性和2名女性)患有瘢痕性脱发,年龄从5岁开始,2个月到12年,本研究包括10个月。瘢痕形成时间7个月~5年。站点是顶点(2),眉毛(3),正面发际线(3),和时间区域(2)。
    结果:本组9例患儿随访6~34个月,治疗方案如下:FUE(5例),FUT(3例),和FUT结合FUE(1例)。治疗期间无明显并发症发生。移植的头发长得很好,方向和形状令人满意,生存率>90%。
    结论:对于手术后烧伤和瘢痕性脱发的儿童,毛发移植可以显著改善其外观,手术风险低,患者满意度高。
    BACKGROUND: Scarring alopecia can significantly affect children emotionally. Follicular unit excision (FUE) and follicular unit transplantation (FUT) have been applied for scar treatment.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of follicular unit hair transplantation in treating scarring alopecia in children.
    METHODS: A total of nine children (seven males and two females) with cicatricial alopecia, ranging in age from 5 years, 2 months to 12 years, 10 months were included in this study. Scar formation time ranged from 7 months to 5 years. Sites were vertex (2), eyebrow (3), frontal hairline (3), and temporal regions (2).
    RESULTS: Nine children in this group were followed up for 6-34 months with the following treatment options: FUE (5 cases), FUT (3 cases), and FUT combined with FUE (1 case). No significant complications were observed during the treatment. The transplanted hair grew well, the direction and shape were satisfactory, and the survival rate was >90%.
    CONCLUSIONS: For children with burn trauma and cicatricial alopecia after surgery, hair transplantation can significantly improve their appearance with low surgical risk and high patient satisfaction rate.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:毛发移植(HT)对于患者和外科医生来说都是安全且有益的程序。可乐定可能是HT的良好佐剂,因为它具有镇痛作用,抗焦虑药,和镇静作用。
    目的:研究可乐定作为HT术前用药的疗效。
    方法:该研究是一项前瞻性试验,纳入了2017年1月至5月间接受HT的46例连续患者。到达时生命参数正常的患者在手术开始前30分钟给予Tab可乐定(0.1mg)[可乐定组(n=30)];其余包括在对照组(n=16)中。在手术期间每30分钟监测生命体征直至结束。对患者进行疼痛评估,术中镇静水平和术后镇痛。
    结果:所有接受可乐定的患者,除了一个,在整个手术期间都很舒适,没有疼痛;九人进入深度睡眠。在对照组的16名患者中,没有患者报告深度睡眠,3感到不安,和4有轻微的疼痛。两组均无不良影响。
    结论:我们的研究表明,可乐定作为HT的麻醉前药物是有用的。然而,这是一项试点研究,需要进一步进行更大的研究。
    BACKGROUND: Hair transplantation (HT) is a safe and rewarding procedure for a patient as well as the surgeon. Clonidine may be a good adjuvant in HT because of its analgesic, anxiolytic, and sedative effects.
    OBJECTIVE: To study efficacy of Clonidine as a preoperative medication in HT.
    METHODS: The study was a prospective trial of 46 consecutive patients who underwent HT between January and May 2017. Patients with normal vital parameters on arrival were given Tab clonidine (0.1 mg) 30 min before starting of the procedure [Clonidine group (n = 30)]; rest were included in the control group (n = 16). Vitals were monitored every 30 min during surgery until the end. Patients were assessed for pain, level of sedation during surgery and for postoperative analgesia.
    RESULTS: All patients who received clonidine, except one, were comfortable and experienced no pain throughout the duration of surgery; nine went into deep sleep. Of the 16 patients in the control group, no patients reported deep sleep, 3 felt restless, and 4 had mild pain. There were no untoward effects in both groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that clonidine is useful as a pre-anesthetic medication in HT. However, this is a pilot study and further larger studies are needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The evolutionary process of modern hair transplantation began with the plug era and, transitioning through a period of minigrafting and micrografting, finally led to follicular unit transplantation (FUT). Apart from the expansion of donor:recipient ratio, this technique produces an excellent esthetic result, indistinguishable from the natural hair. The merit of strip harvest lies in the maximum amount of follicular unit harvest, minimizing the amount of hair follicle transection, and producing a single scar, irrespective of number of sessions. This article summarizes the prerequisites, indications, contraindications, and technique of strip harvest.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:毛囊的线性疤痕和错位是毛囊单位移植(FUT)或剥离技术的缺点。最常见的错位是在条带的末端。虽然大多数外科医生试图匹配头发方向以达到最佳的头发对齐,他们的尝试往往是不成功的。
    目的:我们旨在评估试纸设计,以改善毛发移植过程中的毛发排列。
    方法:我们对157例接受头发移植的患者进行了回顾性研究,这些患者使用常用的椭圆形切口或我们在供体条尖端设计的新型三角旗形切口进行了头发移植。两名盲人评估人员使用5点视觉模拟量表评估了头发对齐的结果。
    结果:总计,对157名患者的303个伤口进行了评估。总的来说,我们的三角旗形设计(TFD)比普通椭圆形设计(CED)实现了更好的头发对齐(p=0.01)。毛发方向在上伤口边缘是直的,毛发方向在下伤口边缘是向内的患者显示TFD改善的结果,而伤口上下边缘毛发向内的患者使用CED显示出更好的结果。
    结论:对于大多数毛发移植患者,供体条的TFD尖端实现了正确的毛发排列。
    本期刊要求作者为每篇文章分配一定程度的证据。对于这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者说明www。springer.com/00266.
    BACKGROUND: The linear scar and misalignment of hair follicles are disadvantages of the follicular unit transplantation (FUT) or strip technique. The most common misalignment is at the end of the strip. Although most surgeons try to match hair direction to achieve optimal hair alignment, their attempts are often unsuccessful.
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess strip designs to improve hair alignment during hair transplantation.
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 157 patients who underwent hair transplantation with either the commonly used elliptical incision or our novel triangular flag-shaped designed incision on the donor strip tip. Two blind evaluators assessed the outcome of hair alignment using a 5-point visual analog scale.
    RESULTS: In total, 303 wounds on 157 patients were assessed. Overall, our triangular flag-shaped design (TFD) achieved better hair alignment than the common elliptical design (CED) (p=0.01). Patients with hair direction straight on the upper wound edge and hair direction inward on the lower wound edge showed improved outcomes with TFD, whereas patients with hair direction inward on both upper and lower wound edges showed better outcomes with CED.
    CONCLUSIONS: The TFD tip of donor strips achieved proper hair alignment for most hair transplant patients.
    UNASSIGNED: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    显著的雄激素性脱发发生在50岁以上的男性中,在女性中,它发生在许多围绝经期,更年期,绝经后。到60岁时,据估计,80%的女性经历脱发。其他非雄激素性形式的脱发是由于各种皮肤病以及全身性疾病而发生的。儿童也可能会出现明显的脱发,通常是由于遗传异常和创伤的发生。在这篇文章中,作者讨论了男性脱发的组合方法,女人,还有孩子.
    Significant androgenetic hair loss occurs in men older than 50 years, and in women it occurs in many who are perimenopausal, menopausal, and postmenopausal. By age 60 years, it is estimated that 80% of women experience hair loss. Other nonandrogenetic forms of hair loss occur due to various dermatologic disorders as well as systemic disorders. Children may also experience significant hair loss, often due to genetic abnormalities and incidences of trauma. In this article the author discusses a combination approach to hair loss for men, women, and children.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号