endodontic therapy

牙髓治疗
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    预约间疼痛(IAP)是牙髓预约之间发生的术后疼痛的一种亚型。它可能在第一次预约后的几个小时内开始,并可能持续几天。除了机械仪表和彻底灌溉,肛门内药物在根管消毒中起着核心作用,从而降低了IAP。这项研究的目的是评估姜黄作为肛门内药物对有症状的不可逆性牙髓炎(SIP)患者的IAP的影响。100名健康的成年患者在其单根上颌或下颌牙齿之一中患有SIP,平行,单盲临床试验。经过彻底的生物力学准备,根管随机服用以下药物之一,对照(无药物),氢氧化钙,三重抗生素糊剂(TAP),还有姜黄.4h时使用视觉模拟量表记录疼痛,24h,每天,直到第七天。使用Kruskal-Wallis分析数据,Mann-WhitneyU,和Wilcoxon符号等级测试.氢氧化钙之间的疼痛评分无统计学差异,TAP或姜黄集团。可以得出结论,姜黄,氢氧化钙,和TAP在控制IAP方面同样有效。
    Inter-appointment pain (IAP) is a subtype of postoperative pain which occurs between endodontic appointments. It may begin within a few hours after the first appointment and may continue for several days. Apart from mechanical instrumentation and thorough irrigation, intracanal medicaments play a central role in the disinfection of root canals and thus decreasing IAP. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of Curcuma Longa as an intracanal medicament on IAP in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis (SIP). One hundred healthy adult patients having SIP in one of their single-rooted maxillary or mandibular teeth participated in this randomized, parallel, single-blinded clinical trial. After thorough biomechanical preparation, the root canals were randomly medicated with one of the following medicaments, Control (no medicament), Calcium Hydroxide, triple antibiotic paste (TAP), and Curcuma Longa. The pain was recorded using Visual analog scale at 4 h, 24 h, and every day until the seventh day. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. No statistical difference in pain scores was observed between Calcium Hydroxide, TAP or Curcuma Longa groups. It can be concluded that Curcuma Longa, Calcium hydroxide, and TAP are equally effective in controlling IAP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    要评估和比较三种不同的根管封闭剂(Endo-SequenceBC,BioRootRCS和氧化锌丁香酚)在单次根管治疗中的术后疼痛。
    根据纳入标准随机选择60名年龄在18-60岁之间的受试者。然后将受试者分为三组,每组20名患者。在所有患者中,进行了一次根管治疗,然后使用不同的密封剂进行闭塞。在第一组中,使用了End-Sequencesealer,在II组生物根RCS和III组中分别使用氧化锌丁香酚密封剂。
    将三组的功效与I组的功效进行比较,获得了统计学上的显着结果。
    在研究的限制范围内,可以得出结论,尽管所有的密封剂都能有效减轻术后疼痛,使用EndoSequenceBCsealers的患者评估了具有统计学意义的结果。
    UNASSIGNED: To evaluate and compare three different root canal sealers (Endo-Sequence BC, Bio Root RCS and Zinc Oxide Eugenol) on post operative pain in single visit root canal therapies.
    UNASSIGNED: 60 subjects with age ranging from 18-60 years were randomly selected depending upon the inclusion criteria. The subjects were then divided into three groups with 20 patients in each. In all the patients\' single visit root canal treatment was done followed by obturation using different sealers. In Group I Endo- Sequence sealer was used, in Group II Bio-Root RCS and in Group III Zinc Oxide Eugenol sealers were used respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: statistically significant results were obtained on comparing the efficacy of three groups with Group I proving to be much effect among the three.
    UNASSIGNED: within the limitation of the study it can be concluded that though all the sealers were effective in reducing post-operative pain, patients with Endo Sequence BC sealers evaluated statistically significant results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管在仪器系统和药物干预方面取得了重大突破,牙髓治疗后的疼痛仍然是一个严重的问题.牙髓器械系统类型在牙髓治疗后的术后疼痛中的作用一直存在争议。
    目的:为了评估不同的牙髓仪器系统,即Reciproc(GmbH,慕尼黑),OneShape®(MicroMega,法国),ProtaperGold(DentsplySirona,美国),和Hyflex®EDM(Coltène/WhaledentInc.,美国)文件系统,关于牙髓治疗后的术后疼痛方法和材料:牙髓科治疗了20至50岁的健康患者,这些患者在一个或多个上颌磨牙或下颌磨牙中出现不可修复的牙髓炎症状。五百是样品的确定大小。研究参与者分为五类,每人包括100名参与者。这些类别是:类别1:Reciproc仪器系统。类别2:OneShape®仪器系统。第3类:ProtaperGold仪表系统。第4类:HyFlex®EDM仪表系统。第5类:控制(不锈钢K文件)。牙髓治疗后,这些分数是在6小时记录的,12小时,24小时,48小时,和72小时使用VAS量表。
    结果:对照组的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分(平均值±SD)为0.73±0.40(<0.001)。Reciproc组的VAS评分为0.43±0.05(<0.001)。OneShape®组的VAS评分为0.36±0.09(<0.001)。ProteceGold组的VAS评分为0.41±0.08(<0.001)。HyFlex®EDM组的VAS评分为0.55±0.02(<0.001)。与对照组相比,在72小时随访时,所有仪器技术的VAS评分均较低,具有有意义的统计学意义(<0.001)。然而,Reciproc术后疼痛,OneShape®,ProtaperGold,和HyFlex®EDM仪器系统之间的比较在临床上没有差异。然而,与Reciproc和ProtaperGold相比,OneShape®和HyFlex®EDM的VAS值更高,与Reciproc和ProtaperGold相比,OneShape和HyFlex®EDM显示术后疼痛增加。还观察到,随着随访时间从6小时增加到72小时,所有仪器系统的VAS评分均下降。随访6小时术后疼痛最大,随访72小时术后疼痛最小。然而,与Reciproc和ProtaperGold相比,OneShape®和HyFlex®EDM的下降幅度较小,与Reciproc和ProtaperGold相比,OneShape®和HyFlex®EDM术后疼痛增加。
    结论:在Reciproc的所有牙髓手术随访中,术后疼痛较少,OneShape®,ProtaperGold,和HyFlex®EDM比对照组。OneShape®和HyFlex®EDM组的VAS评分高于Reciproc和ProtaperGold组,与Reciproc和ProtaperGold相比,OneShape®和HyFlex®EDM仪器的术后疼痛增加。
    BACKGROUND: Despite substantial breakthroughs in instrumentation systems and pharmaceutical interventions, pain following endodontic therapy remains a serious concern. The effect of the type of endodontic instrumentation system in post-operative pain after endodontic therapy has been a matter of debate.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate different endodontic instrumentation systems, namely Reciproc (GmbH, Munich), OneShape® (MicroMega, France), Protaper Gold (Dentsply Sirona, USA), and Hyflex® EDM (Coltène/Whaledent Inc., USA) file systems, regarding post-operative pain after endodontic therapy Methods and materials: The endodontic department treated healthy patients aged 20 to 50 years who were experiencing symptoms of irreparable pulpitis in one or more maxillary molars or mandibular molars. Five hundred was the determined size of the sample. The study participants were divided into five categories, each comprising 100 participants. These categories were: Category 1: Reciproc instrumentation system. Category 2: OneShape® instrumentation system. Category 3: ProtaperGold instrumentation system. Category 4: HyFlex® EDM instrumentation system. Category 5: Control (stainless steel K-files). Following endodontic therapy, these scores were recorded at 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, and 72 hours using the VAS scale.
    RESULTS: The visual analog scale (VAS) score (mean±SD) in the control group was 0.73± 0.40 (<0.001). The VAS score in the Reciproc group was 0.43± 0.05 (<0.001). The VAS score in the OneShape® group was 0.36±0.09 (<0.001). The VAS score in the Protaper Gold group was 0.41 ±0.08 (<0.001). The VAS score in the HyFlex® EDM group was 0.55 ±0.02 (<0.001). The VAS score in all instrumentation techniques at 72 hours follow-up was lesser in comparison to a control group with meaningful statistical significance (<0.001). However, the post-operative pain among the Reciproc, OneShape®, Protaper Gold, and HyFlex® EDM instrumentation systems was not different clinically when compared among themselves. However, VAS values were greater in OneShape® and HyFlex® EDM compared to Reciproc and Protaper Gold, showing increased post-operative pain in OneShape and HyFlex® EDM compared to Reciproc and Protaper Gold. It was also observed that there was a decline in the VAS score in all instrumentation systems as the follow-up period increased from 6 hours to 72 hours, with maximum post-operative pain at 6 hours of follow-up and minimum post-operative pain at 72 hours of follow-up. However, the decline was lesser in OneShape® and HyFlex® EDM in comparison to Reciproc and Protaper Gold, with increased post-operative pain in OneShape® and HyFlex® EDM in comparison to Reciproc and Protaper Gold.
    CONCLUSIONS: Post-operative pain at all follow-ups of endodontic procedures was less in Reciproc, OneShape®, Protaper Gold, and HyFlex® EDM than in the control group. VAS scores were higher in the OneShape® and HyFlex® EDM groups compared to the Reciproc and Protaper Gold groups, indicating increased post-operative pain with OneShape® and HyFlex® EDM instruments in comparison to Reciproc and Protaper Gold.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    评估常规牙髓切除术和牙髓切除术在12个月内的临床和影像学成功。
    这项研究是单盲的,平行组前瞻性,随机化,和对照临床试验。该研究的招募包括根据纳入标准评估258颗落叶磨牙的资格。每组共分配104颗牙齿,也就是说,I组(常规牙髓切除术)和II组(显微镜下牙髓切除术)。然而,由于2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间不可避免的情况,每组98颗和90颗牙齿,分别。除第II组使用牙髓显微镜外,两组均使用标准协议进行牙髓切除术。由独立的盲观察者评估临床和影像学结果,并使用适当的统计检验进行分析。
    6个月时的临床成功率为95.7%和96.5%,在12个月时,第一组和第二组分别为96.6%和97.7%,分别。6个月时的射线照相成功率为93.5%和95.4%,在12个月时,第一组和第二组分别为95.5和98.8%,分别。两组的总体成功率无统计学差异。
    本研究得出的结论是,使用牙髓显微镜可以获得与常规牙髓切除术相比的结果。
    KumarG,RehmanF.在儿科患者中使用和不使用牙科手术显微镜进行牙髓切除术的临床和影像学成功的比较评估:体内研究。IntJClinPediatrDent2023;16(S-2):S155-S160。
    UNASSIGNED: To assess the clinical and radiographic success of conventional pulpectomy and pulpectomy done under an endodontic microscope over a period of 12 months.
    UNASSIGNED: The study was conducted as a single-blinded, parallel-group prospective, randomized, and controlled clinical trial. The enrollment of the study involved the assessment of 258 deciduous molars for eligibility as per the inclusion criteria. A total of 104 teeth were allocated to each group, that is, group I (conventional pulpectomy) and group II (pulpectomy under microscope). However, due to unavoidable circumstances during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, 98 and 90 teeth were treated in each group, respectively. Pulpectomy in both groups was done using standard protocol except for the use of an endodontic microscope in group II. The clinical and radiographic outcomes were assessed by an independent blinded observer and analyzed using appropriate statistical tests.
    UNASSIGNED: The clinical success at 6 months is 95.7 and 96.5%, and at 12 months is 96.6 and 97.7% in groups I and II, respectively. The radiographic success at 6 months is 93.5 and 95.4%, and at 12 months is 95.5 and 98.8% in groups I and II, respectively. The overall success rates of both groups with statistically no significant differences.
    UNASSIGNED: The present study concludes comparable results are achieved using an endodontic microscope to conventional pulpectomy without magnification.
    UNASSIGNED: Kumar G, Rehman F. Comparative Evaluation of Clinical and Radiographic Success of Pulpectomy Done with and without Dental Operating Microscope in Pediatric Patients: An In Vivo Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023;16(S-2):S155-S160.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的本横断面研究旨在评估根管治疗对沙特阿拉伯王国(KSA)患者口腔健康相关生活质量(OHRQoL)的影响。KSA的人口数据非常有限,强调在这一特定领域进行额外研究的意义。方法这项研究是在牙科学院的牙科诊所进行的,卡西姆大学,2022年1月至6月。总共包括112例接受牙髓治疗(ET)的不可逆牙髓炎患者。记录人口统计学数据和治疗程序。分析患者对OHIP-14问卷的反应,以评估其OHRQoL。分数被转换成定性类别(良好,中度,差)用于分类。结果大多数患者(59.8%)在ET后报告OHRQoL良好。身体疼痛是唯一的变量,超过50%的患者报告经历疼痛。年龄和吸烟状况与OHRQoL较差显着相关。然而,在OHRQoL中没有观察到显著的性别差异.结论ET对沙特阿拉伯患者OHRQoL有积极影响。该研究强调了考虑以患者为中心的结果的重要性,例如OHRQoL,在评估根管治疗的成功。需要进行纵向设计和随机对照试验的进一步研究,以更好地了解根管治疗对OHRQoL患者的长期影响,并将其与其他牙科治疗进行比较。
    Objective This cross-sectional study aimed to assess the influence of root canal treatment on the oral-health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of patients in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). The data on KSA\'s population are significantly limited, highlighting the significance of additional research to be carried out in this particular field. Methods The study was conducted at the dental clinics of the College of Dentistry, Qassim University, from January to June 2022. A total of 112 patients who had undergone endodontic therapy (ET) for teeth with irreversible pulpitis were included. Demographic data and treatment procedures were recorded. The patients\' responses to the OHIP-14 questionnaire were analyzed to assess their OHRQoL. The scores were converted into qualitative categories (good, moderate, poor) for classification. Results The majority of patients (59.8%) reported a good OHRQoL after ET. Physical pain was the only variable where more than 50% of patients reported experiencing pain. Older age and smoking status were significantly associated with a poorer OHRQoL. However, no significant gender differences in OHRQoL were observed. Conclusion ET had a positive impact on the OHRQoL of patients in Saudi Arabia. The study highlights the importance of considering patient-centered outcomes, such as OHRQoL, in assessing the success of root canal treatment. Further research with longitudinal designs and randomized controlled trials is needed to better understand the long-term effects of root canal treatment on patients\' OHRQoL and to compare them with other dental treatments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在将牙冠放置在牙齿上时,牙髓有很多刺激的机会。这项研究的目的是发现和检查影响常规根管治疗的患病率的变量后,牙齿恢复全覆盖冠。
    从2000年到2010年十年的医院记录进行了回顾性评估。评估了人口统计信息以及对全冠牙齿进行根管治疗干预的各种变量。比较这些值的显著性。
    研究中最终确定的牙齿总数为4308。在用全覆盖冠治疗的总牙齿中,50%是金属陶瓷,42%是全陶瓷,9%是全金属冠。十年后,每颗带冠的牙齿存活的可能性为91%。最常见的不良事件是RCT干预。金属陶瓷冠的成活率较差,需要最大程度的干预。年轻年龄组的生存率低于老年组。
    牙髓治疗在牙冠安装后不太可能是必要的。随着患者年龄的下降和全瓷或PFM冠的使用,这种风险上升。
    UNASSIGNED: There are numerous chances for pulpal irritation during the placement of a crown on a tooth. This study\'s goal was to find and examine the variables that influence the prevalence of routine root canal therapy after the teeth were restored with full coverage crowns.
    UNASSIGNED: The hospital records were retrospectively evaluated from 2000 to 2010 for a decade. The demographics as well as the various variables that caused for the intervention with the root canal therapy for the teeth with the full crowns were evaluated. The values were compared for the significance.
    UNASSIGNED: The total number of the teeth that were finalized in the study was 4308. Of the total teeth that were treated with full coverage crowns, 50% were metal ceramic, 42% were full ceramic, and 9% were full metal crowns. After 10 years, possibility that every tooth with a crown would survive was 91%. The most frequent adverse incident was the intervention with the RCT. Metal ceramic crowns had poor survival rates and needed the maximum intervention. Younger age-group had least survival rate than the older age-groups.
    UNASSIGNED: Endodontic therapy is unlikely to be necessary after crown installation. As the patient\'s age declines and all-ceramic or PFM crowns are used, this risk rises.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    化学灌洗是牙髓治疗的重要组成部分,和辅助冲洗提高了非手术根管系统消毒的效率,减少微生物负荷,并增强灌洗剂在整个根管系统中的渗透。这项研究旨在确定吉达市政府和私营部门的普通牙科医生(GDPs)和牙髓专家在根管治疗期间化学冲洗及其辅助使用的当前趋势,沙特阿拉伯。方法这项横断面研究使用了一项自我管理的调查,该调查发送给吉达市政府和私营部门的GDP和牙髓专家,沙特阿拉伯。从2019年11月至2020年5月接受回复。调查随机分配给同意的参与者。结果使用描述性统计呈现。结果共有302名参与者回答了调查,44%的反应率。大多数回答来自GDP(54%),而46%来自牙髓专家。关于工作场所,59%的受访者是公共部门的专业人士,25%是私营部门的专业人士,16%是公共和私营部门的专业人士。大约30%的受访者在根管治疗期间使用次氯酸钠(NaOCI)作为主要的冲洗溶液,52%的人在其全强度浓度下使用它,18%和17%的人更喜欢将其与乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)或EDTA和盐水组合使用,分别。当被问及在治疗期间选择他们选择的冲洗剂的原因时,抗菌能力和组织溶解是80%和57%参与者的最关键因素,分别。一半的受访者将运河灌溉至距顶点2毫米,而21%的受访者将运河灌溉至距顶点1毫米。四分之三的参与者旨在在根管治疗期间去除涂抹层。只有47%的受访者使用灌溉助剂,71%的人报告说,他们对灌溉溶液的选择会根据顶点是打开还是关闭而有所不同。结论大多数受访者使用全强度NaOCI浓度作为主要冲洗液,并在根管治疗期间常规去除涂抹层。只有47%的受访者使用了超声波等灌溉辅助手段。
    Introduction  Chemical irrigation is a crucial component of endodontic therapy, and irrigation adjuncts increase the efficiency of non-surgical root canal system disinfection, reduce microbial loads, and enhance the penetration of irrigants throughout the root canal system. This study aimed to determine the current trends in chemical irrigation and its adjunct use during root canal therapy by general dental practitioners (GDPs) and endodontic specialists in both government and private sectors in the city of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Methods This cross-sectional study used a self-administered survey sent to GDPs and endodontic specialists in both government and private sectors in the city of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Responses were accepted from November 2019 till May 2020. The survey was randomly distributed to consenting participants. The results are presented using descriptive statistics. Results A total of 302 participants responded to the survey, with a 44% response rate. The majority of responses were from GDPs (54%), while 46% were from endodontic specialists. Regarding the workplace, 59% of respondents were public sector professionals, 25% were private sector professionals, and 16% were both public and private sector professionals. Around 30% of the respondents used sodium hypochlorite (NaOCI) as their primary irrigation solution during root canal treatment, with 52% using it at its full-strength concentration and 18% and 17% preferring to use it in combination with Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) only or EDTA and saline, respectively. When asked to rank the reasons for choosing their irrigant of choice during therapy; antibacterial capability and tissue dissolution were the most crucial factors to 80% and 57% of participants, respectively. Half of the respondents irrigated the canal to 2 mm from the apex and 21% irrigated to 1 mm from the apex. Three-quarters of participants aimed to remove the smear layer during root canal treatment. Only 47% of respondents used adjuncts to irrigation, and 71% reported that their choice of irrigation solution would differ depending on whether the apex is open or closed. Conclusion Most respondents used full-strength NaOCI concentration as the main irrigation solution and routinely removed the smear layer during root canal treatment. Only 47% of respondents used irrigation adjuncts such as ultrasonics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的是评估临床方法在确定上颌第一磨牙第二近颊管存在方面的有效性。还评估了年龄和显微镜经验的影响。选择了66颗牙齿,并通过锥形束计算机断层扫描在所有样品中确认了近颊管。进入牙髓腔后,通过直接视觉评估牙齿;牙科放大镜和手术显微镜。这些方法均未在所有样品中成功找到中颊管。专业人员<40,放大倍数不影响位置。专业人员>40,放大倍数显着影响的位置。在直视下,>40岁的专业人士比那些<40岁的有经验的人拥有更少的运河。总之,这些初步发现表明,当使用显微镜时,有经验的专业人士,不管年龄,发现了更多的运河。对于超过40年的专业人士来说,显微镜的使用意义重大。
    The aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of clinical methods in identifying the presence of second mesiobuccal canal in maxillary first molars. The influence of age and experience with microscopy was also assessed. Sixty six teeth were selected and the mesiobuccal canal was confirmed in all of the samples by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography. After endodontic cavity access, teeth were evaluated through direct visual; dental loupe and operating microscope. None of the methods was successful in finding the mesiobuccal canal in all samples. Professionals <40, the magnification did not influence the location. Professionals >40, the magnification significantly influenced the location. In the direct vision, professionals >40 years located fewer canals than those <40 years of age with experience. In conclusion, these preliminary findings showed that when the microscope was used, the professionals with experience, regardless of age, found a higher number of canals. The use of the microscope was significant for professionals >40 years.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:粪肠球菌是在感染的根管中发现的最常见和最重要的微生物,与持续的根尖周炎和牙髓治疗失败有关。在化学机械制备感染的根管后使用的肛门内药物对于根除这种微生物至关重要,并为牙髓治疗的长期成功铺平了道路。因此,本体外研究是为了评估氢氧化钙(Ca(OH)2)的抗菌功效,三重抗生素糊剂(甲硝唑400毫克+米诺环素100毫克+环丙沙星500毫克),2%氯己定(CHX)联合0.5%西曲溴胺根除粪肠球菌生物膜。
    方法:取80例牙本质标本,经口外感染粪肠球菌,诱导微生物定植。然后根据所使用的药物将标本分为四组,每组20个,并根据在消除药物后立即或在脑心输注(BHI)培养基中孵育24小时后进行的活细胞评估,进一步细分为两个亚组:第I组标本用Ca(OH)2处理,第II组用三重抗生素糊剂处理,使用2%CHX和0.5%西曲米特的第三组,第IV组用盐水(对照)在37°C持续7天。使用共聚焦显微镜进行活细胞的评估。
    结果:2%CHX与0.5%西曲溴胺(组III)和三重抗生素糊剂(组II)组合显示出统计学上显著的结果,与Ca(OH)2(组I)相比具有高的抗微生物效力和较低的活细胞百分比。消除药物后,第一组中活细胞的平均百分比为64.7%,第二组为1.52%,第三组为1.49%,在IV组中为83.4%。在BHI培养基中孵育24小时后,2%CHX与0.5%西曲米特(III组)的组合显示出1.27%的平均活细胞与Ca(OH)2(I组)中的84.2%相比,具有统计学意义(p<0.05)的结果,在三联抗生素糊剂(第二组)中1.82%,和盐水中的94.2%(IV组对照)。
    结论:与Ca(OH)2相比,2%CHX与0.5%西曲溴胺联合显示出最大的抗菌功效,平均活细胞数量最少,其次是三联抗生素糊剂。基于这些发现,2%CHX联合0.5%西曲溴胺最有效地从口腔外感染的牙本质生物膜中根除粪肠球菌。
    BACKGROUND: Enterococcus faecalis is the most common and important microorganism found in infected root canals associated with persistent periapical periodontitis and failing endodontically treated tooth. Intracanal medicaments used after chemomechanical preparation of an infected root canal play a vital in eradication of this microorganism and pave the way for long-term success of endodontic therapy. Hence, the present in vitro study was conducted to assess the antimicrobial efficacy of calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2), triple antibiotic paste (metronidazole 400 mg + minocycline 100 mg + ciprofloxacin 500 mg), and 2% chlorhexidine (CHX) combined with 0.5% cetrimide on eradication of E. faecalis biofilm.
    METHODS: Eighty dentin specimens were taken and infected extraorally with E. faecalis to induce microbial colonization. The specimens were then divided into four groups of twenty each based on medicaments used and further subdivided into two subgroups based on assessment of live cells done either immediately after the elimination of the medicament or after 24-h incubation in brain-heart infusion (BHI) medium: Group I specimens were treated with Ca(OH)2, Group II with triple antibiotic paste, Group III with 2% CHX combined with 0.5% cetrimide, and Group IV with saline (control) for 7 days at 37°C. Assessment of live cells was done using confocal microscope.
    RESULTS: 2% CHX combined with 0.5% cetrimide (Group III) and triple antibiotic paste (Group II) showed a statistically significant result with high antimicrobial efficacy and lower percentage of live cells as compared to Ca(OH)2 (Group I). The mean percentage of live cells in Group I immediately after elimination of medicaments was 64.7%, in Group II was 1.52%, in Group III was 1.49%, and in Group IV was 83.4%. After 24 h of incubation in BHI medium, 2% CHX combined with 0.5% cetrimide (Group III) showed a statistically significant (p < 0.05) result of 1.27% mean live cells as compared to 84.2% in Ca(OH)2 (Group I), 1.82% in triple antibiotic paste (Group II), and 94.2% in saline (Group IV control).
    CONCLUSIONS: 2% CHX combined with 0.5% cetrimide exhibited maximum antimicrobial efficacy with least number of mean live cells followed by triple antibiotic paste as compared to Ca(OH)2. Based on these findings, 2% CHX combined with 0.5% cetrimide was most effective in eradicating E. faecalis from the extraorally infected dentine biofilm.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项体内研究的目的是评估/比较患有真实合并内周病变(EPL)的患者的临床牙周参数,单独用古塔胶胶(GP)和三氧化矿物质(MTA)作为闭塞材料,并在此类病变中添加植骨。120名沙特患者(平均年龄=41岁)被诊断为真正的联合EPL参与了这项研究。I组(对照组,n=30)用常规牙髓治疗,使用GP进行闭塞。第II组(n=30)采用MTA进行常规牙髓治疗以进行闭塞。第III组(n=30)采用常规牙髓治疗,使用GP进行闭塞移植手术以填充骨缺损。第IV组(n=30)使用MTA进行常规牙髓治疗,以填充骨缺损。临床参数(口袋深度(PD);临床附着丧失(CAL);角化组织宽度(KTW);牙龈表型(G.Ph.)和锥形束计算机断层扫描心尖指数(CBCTPAI)记录并在基线进行比较,3、6、12个月的间隔。对于第三和第四组,CBCTPAI在6个月和1年的间隔与其他组显示显着差异(p<0.0001)。MTA+植骨组在6个月和1年随访时分别有76%和90%的0分,分别。比较3个月时研究组之间的PD平均值,6个月和1年在3个月时表现出显著差异,而GP+植骨受试者的平均PD值显着高于其他3组(p=0.025)。使用GP和MTA进行根管闭塞,同时进行牙周治疗和骨增强,有助于解决复杂的内膜病变。除MTA闭塞外,骨移植被发现是处理EPL病例的最佳治疗策略,并建议治疗EPL患者的临床医生使用。
    The aim of this in-vivo study was to evaluate/compare the clinical periodontal parameters in patients with true combined endo-perio lesions (EPL), treated with gutta-percha (GP) and mineral trioxide (MTA) as an obturation material alone and with addition of bone grafting in such lesions. 120 Saudi patients (mean age = 41yrs) diagnosed with true combined EPL participated in this study. Group I (control group, n = 30) was treated with conventional endodontic treatment using GP for obturation. Group II (n = 30) was treated with conventional endodontic treatment using MTA for obturation. Group III (n = 30) was treated with conventional endodontic treatment using GP for obturation + grafting procedure to fill the bony defect. Group IV (n = 30) was treated with conventional endodontic treatment using MTA for obturation + grafting procedure to fill the bony defect. Clinical parameters (Pocket depth (PD); Clinical attachment loss (CAL); keratinized tissue width (KTW); gingival phenotype (G.Ph.) and Cone Beam Computed Tomography Periapical Index (CBCTPAI)) were recorded and compared at baseline, 3, 6, 12 months\' interval. For the groups III and IV, CBCTPAI showed significant difference (p < 0.0001) with the other groups at 6 months and 1-year interval. The group with MTA + bone graft showed 76% and 90% patients with 0 score at 6 months and 1-year follow-up, respectively. Comparison of mean values of PD among study groups at 3 months, 6 months and 1 year showed significant difference at 3 months, whereas the mean PD values of subjects in GP + bone graft showed significantly higher PD values than other 3 groups (p = 0.025). Use of GP and MTA for root canal obturation along with periodontal therapy and bone augmentation helps in resolving complex endo-perio lesions. Bone grafting in addition to obturation with MTA was found to be the best treatment strategy in management of EPL cases and is recommended for clinicians who are treating EPL patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号