PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
UNASSIGNED: To assess the clinical and radiographic success of conventional pulpectomy and pulpectomy done under an endodontic microscope over a period of 12 months.
UNASSIGNED: The study was conducted as a single-blinded, parallel-group prospective, randomized, and controlled clinical trial. The enrollment of the study involved the assessment of 258 deciduous molars for eligibility as per the inclusion criteria. A total of 104 teeth were allocated to each group, that is, group I (conventional pulpectomy) and group II (pulpectomy under microscope). However, due to unavoidable circumstances during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, 98 and 90 teeth were treated in each group, respectively. Pulpectomy in both groups was done using standard protocol except for the use of an endodontic microscope in group II. The clinical and radiographic outcomes were assessed by an independent blinded observer and analyzed using appropriate statistical tests.
UNASSIGNED: The clinical success at 6 months is 95.7 and 96.5%, and at 12 months is 96.6 and 97.7% in groups I and II, respectively. The radiographic success at 6 months is 93.5 and 95.4%, and at 12 months is 95.5 and 98.8% in groups I and II, respectively. The overall success rates of both groups with statistically no significant differences.
UNASSIGNED: The present study concludes comparable results are achieved using an endodontic microscope to conventional pulpectomy without magnification.
UNASSIGNED: Kumar G, Rehman F. Comparative Evaluation of Clinical and Radiographic Success of Pulpectomy Done with and without Dental Operating Microscope in Pediatric Patients: An In Vivo Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023;16(S-2):S155-S160.
UNASSIGNED: The study was conducted as a single-blinded, parallel-group prospective, randomized, and controlled clinical trial. The enrollment of the study involved the assessment of 258 deciduous molars for eligibility as per the inclusion criteria. A total of 104 teeth were allocated to each group, that is, group I (conventional pulpectomy) and group II (pulpectomy under microscope). However, due to unavoidable circumstances during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, 98 and 90 teeth were treated in each group, respectively. Pulpectomy in both groups was done using standard protocol except for the use of an endodontic microscope in group II. The clinical and radiographic outcomes were assessed by an independent blinded observer and analyzed using appropriate statistical tests.
UNASSIGNED: The clinical success at 6 months is 95.7 and 96.5%, and at 12 months is 96.6 and 97.7% in groups I and II, respectively. The radiographic success at 6 months is 93.5 and 95.4%, and at 12 months is 95.5 and 98.8% in groups I and II, respectively. The overall success rates of both groups with statistically no significant differences.
UNASSIGNED: The present study concludes comparable results are achieved using an endodontic microscope to conventional pulpectomy without magnification.
UNASSIGNED: Kumar G, Rehman F. Comparative Evaluation of Clinical and Radiographic Success of Pulpectomy Done with and without Dental Operating Microscope in Pediatric Patients: An In Vivo Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023;16(S-2):S155-S160.
摘要：
■评估常规牙髓切除术和牙髓切除术在12个月内的临床和影像学成功。
■这项研究是单盲的，平行组前瞻性，随机化，和对照临床试验。该研究的招募包括根据纳入标准评估258颗落叶磨牙的资格。每组共分配104颗牙齿,也就是说,I组（常规牙髓切除术）和II组（显微镜下牙髓切除术）。然而,由于2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间不可避免的情况，每组98颗和90颗牙齿，分别。除第II组使用牙髓显微镜外，两组均使用标准协议进行牙髓切除术。由独立的盲观察者评估临床和影像学结果，并使用适当的统计检验进行分析。
■6个月时的临床成功率为95.7％和96.5％，在12个月时，第一组和第二组分别为96.6％和97.7％，分别。6个月时的射线照相成功率为93.5％和95.4％，在12个月时，第一组和第二组分别为95.5和98.8％，分别。两组的总体成功率无统计学差异。
■本研究得出的结论是，使用牙髓显微镜可以获得与常规牙髓切除术相比的结果。
■KumarG,RehmanF.在儿科患者中使用和不使用牙科手术显微镜进行牙髓切除术的临床和影像学成功的比较评估：体内研究。IntJClinPediatrDent2023；16（S-2）：S155-S160。
■这项研究是单盲的，平行组前瞻性，随机化，和对照临床试验。该研究的招募包括根据纳入标准评估258颗落叶磨牙的资格。每组共分配104颗牙齿,也就是说,I组（常规牙髓切除术）和II组（显微镜下牙髓切除术）。然而,由于2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间不可避免的情况，每组98颗和90颗牙齿，分别。除第II组使用牙髓显微镜外，两组均使用标准协议进行牙髓切除术。由独立的盲观察者评估临床和影像学结果，并使用适当的统计检验进行分析。
■6个月时的临床成功率为95.7％和96.5％，在12个月时，第一组和第二组分别为96.6％和97.7％，分别。6个月时的射线照相成功率为93.5％和95.4％，在12个月时，第一组和第二组分别为95.5和98.8％，分别。两组的总体成功率无统计学差异。
■本研究得出的结论是，使用牙髓显微镜可以获得与常规牙髓切除术相比的结果。
■KumarG,RehmanF.在儿科患者中使用和不使用牙科手术显微镜进行牙髓切除术的临床和影像学成功的比较评估：体内研究。IntJClinPediatrDent2023；16（S-2）：S155-S160。
