communicable disease control

传染病控制
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    适当的传染病特异性健康素养(IDSHL)有利于居民应对传染病。本研究旨在探讨居民获取传染病防治知识(IDPC知识)的方法,以寻求有效的健康教育方法,以提高居民的IDSHL水平。2022年,山东省进行了一项横断面研究,中国。通过多阶段抽样从农村地区招募参与者。IDPC知识认知问卷,作为一个可靠和有效的工具,应用于数据收集和调查参与者的IDPC知识。采用卡方分析法分析不同亚组间IDSHL占有水平的差异。还通过卡方分析检查了人口统计学因素与获取IDPC知识的方法之间的关系。在总共2283名参与者中,IDSHL的持有率为31.80%。IDSHL水平与社会人口因素之间存在显着关联,包括年龄(P<.001),性别(P=0.02),教育(P<.001),职业(P<.001),家庭年收入(P<.001),是否使用智能手机(P<.001),是否在智能手机上浏览微信(P<.001),以及是否在智能手机上浏览除微信以外的应用程序(P<.001)。单因素分析表明,是否采用特定的方法,包括电视(P=0.02),智能手机上的微信(P<.001),传染病防控宣传(P<.001),获得IDPC知识的医生建议(P<.001)与IDSHL水平显著相关。年龄(P<.001),教育(P<0.05),职业(P<0.05),和家庭年收入(P<.01)与获取IDPC知识的方法相关。山东省农村居民充足的IDSHL,中国,并不乐观。传统方法与互联网宣传平台的结合,应该为农村人群中的IDSHL健康教育承担更大的责任。
    Adequate infectious disease-specific health literacy (IDSHL) is of benefit to residents in dealing with infectious diseases. This study aimed to investigate the methods by which residents acquire knowledge about infectious disease prevention and control (IDPC knowledge) so as to find effective health education methods used to improve residents\' IDSHL level. In 2022, a cross-sectional study was conducted in Shandong Province, China. Participants were recruited from rural areas by multistage sampling. The IDPC knowledge cognitive questionnaire, as a reliable and valid tool, was applied to data collection and to investigate the participants\' IDPC knowledge. Chi-square analysis was utilized to analyze the differences in possession level of IDSHL between different subgroups. The relationship between demographic factors and methods to acquire IDPC knowledge was also examined by chi-square analysis. The possession rate of adequate IDSHL among the total 2283 participants was 31.80%. There was a significant association between IDSHL level and socio-demographic factors, including age (P < .001), sex (P = .02), education (P < .001), occupation (P < .001), annual family income (P < .001), whether to use smartphones (P < .001), whether to browse WeChat on smartphones (P < .001), and whether to browse apps on smartphones except WeChat (P < .001). Univariate analysis showed that whether to adopt specific methods, including television (P = .02), WeChat on smartphones (P < .001), propaganda of infectious disease prevention and control (P < .001), and doctor\'s advice (P < .001) to acquire IDPC knowledge had significant associations with IDSHL level. Age (P < .001), education (P < .05), occupation (P < .05), and annual family income (P < .01) were associated with methods to acquire IDPC knowledge. The rural residents\' adequate IDSHL in Shandong Province, China, was not optimistic. The combination of traditional methods and Internet publicity platforms should take greater responsibility for IDSHL health education among rural populations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    During the late Qing Dynasty, Tianjin Customs gradually established the seaport quarantine system to prevent the spread of epidemics from Japan, Hong Kong, and the Northeast. The major infectious diseases inspected by the quarantine institution of Tianjin Port include cholera, plague, smallpox, typhus and yellow fever, of which cholera is the most frequent and influential infectious disease in modern Tianjin, followed by plague and smallpox, and no large-scale epidemics of typhus and yellow fever have been found.In the process of preventing the spreading of foreign infectious diseases, the quarantine institution of Tianjin Port has gradually developing. A set of business system has been established, which is based on ship inspection and takes preventive injection, rat flea research and disease diagnosis and treatment as the core.In conclusion,the seaport quarantine institutions in Tianjin played an active role in the prevention, detection, and response to major infectious diseases ,opened up a precedent for Chinese people to independently handle border health quarantine.Its historical practice and quarantine mode are a window for understanding the development history of quarantine infectious diseases in modern China, which has very important reference value.
    晚清时期,为防止日本、香港、东北等地的疫情传入天津,天津海关逐步建立起天津海港检疫制度。天津海港检疫机构施检的重大传染病包括霍乱、鼠疫、天花、斑疹伤寒和黄热病,其中霍乱是近代天津地区爆发最频繁、影响力最大的传染病,鼠疫、天花次之,未发现斑疹伤寒和黄热病大规模流行的记载。天津海港检疫机构在抵制外来传染病入侵的过程中逐渐成熟,建立起以船舶检验为基础,以预防注射、鼠蚤研究和疾病诊疗为核心的业务体系。天津海港检疫机构在重大传染病预防、检测与应对方面发挥了积极的作用,开辟了国人自主办理国境卫生检疫的先河,其历史实践和检疫模式是认识和了解近代中国检疫传染病发展史的一个窗口,具有十分重要的借鉴价值。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    长期禁闭会导致不同程度的个人恶化。我们在马德里Orcasitas社区的功能依赖人群的全国COVID-19封锁期间研究了这一现象,西班牙,通过测量他们进行日常生活基本活动的能力和死亡率。
    共有127例患者纳入Orcasitas队列。在这个队列中,78.7%是女性,21.3%为男性,他们的平均年龄是86岁。所有参与者的Barthel指数≤60。分析了从分娩前到分娩后以及之后3年的变化,并评估了这些变化对生存率的影响(2020-2023年).
    禁闭后功能评估显示,Barthel评分(t=-5.823;p<0.001)和分类水平(z=-2.988;p<0.003)的独立性均优于禁闭前。这种改善在接下来的3年里逐渐消失,该队列中40.9%的患者在此期间死亡。这些结果与Barthel指数(z=-3.646;p<0.001)和依赖水平(风险比2.227;CI1.514-3.276)相关。男性(HR1.745;CI1.045-2.915)和严重依赖者(HR2.169;CI1.469-3.201)的死亡率较高。将Barthel指数的截止点设置为40,可以最好地检测与依赖相关的死亡风险。
    家庭禁闭和COVID-19大流行导致的死亡风险唤醒了功能依赖的成年人群体在逆境中的一种恢复力。Barthel指数是中期和长期死亡率的良好预测指标,并且是在健康计划中检测处于危险中的人群的有用方法。40的截止分数可用于此目的。在某种程度上,非制度化的依赖人口是无形人口。未来的研究应该分析观察到的高死亡率的原因。
    UNASSIGNED: Prolonged confinement can lead to personal deterioration at various levels. We studied this phenomenon during the nationwide COVID-19 lockdown in a functionally dependent population of the Orcasitas neighborhood of Madrid, Spain, by measuring their ability to perform basic activities of daily living and their mortality rate.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 127 patients were included in the Orcasitas cohort. Of this cohort, 78.7% were female, 21.3% were male, and their mean age was 86 years. All participants had a Barthel index of ≤ 60. Changes from pre- to post-confinement and 3 years afterward were analyzed, and the effect of these changes on survival was assessed (2020-2023).
    UNASSIGNED: The post-confinement functional assessment showed significant improvement in independence over pre-confinement for both the Barthel score (t = -5.823; p < 0.001) and the classification level (z = -2.988; p < 0.003). This improvement progressively disappeared in the following 3 years, and 40.9% of the patients in this cohort died during this period. These outcomes were associated with the Barthel index (z = -3.646; p < 0.001) and the level of dependence (hazard ratio 2.227; CI 1.514-3.276). Higher mortality was observed among men (HR 1.745; CI 1.045-2.915) and those with severe dependence (HR 2.169; CI 1.469-3.201). Setting the cutoff point of the Barthel index at 40 provided the best detection of the risk of death associated with dependence.
    UNASSIGNED: Home confinement and the risk of death due to the COVID-19 pandemic awakened a form of resilience in the face of adversity among the population of functionally dependent adults. The Barthel index is a good predictor of medium- and long-term mortality and is a useful method for detecting populations at risk in health planning. A cutoff score of 40 is useful for this purpose. To a certain extent, the non-institutionalized dependent population is an invisible population. Future studies should analyze the causes of the high mortality observed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了减缓COVID-19的传播,2020年3月23日,英国实施了严格的封锁。随后是限制性较低的封锁交替时期,直到2021年夏季取消大多数公共卫生限制。虽然这些措施是必要的,它们显著影响人们的日常活动,生活方式,和心理健康。本文提出了一项针对英国55岁以上女性的纵向研究,目的是了解COVID-19和随后的15个月禁闭期是如何影响他们的生活方式和情绪的。该研究通过在线调查收集数据,受访者报告了访问活动的频率和方式,以及他们在不同的研究阶段的积极和消极的情绪经历,这些阶段包括封锁和不太严格的时期。与之前强调女性和老年人在封锁期间的脆弱性的研究相反,这项研究发现,研究组在整个研究期间保持总体积极的前景,并通过增加他们对某些活动的参与来成功地适应封锁,特别是,活动,如“变得活跃”。此外,我们的研究结果表明,许多在线活动的适应行为发生了快速变化,比如文化活动。然而,该研究还显示,在2020年第二次封锁和2021年随后的封锁期间,一些活动出现了负面情绪和减少,突显了长期监禁所固有的挑战。此外,研究发现负面影响与某些活动有关,包括在家工作和学习。这些发现为55岁以上的女性如何应对压力环境提供了宝贵的见解,这可以为制定具有韧性和精神健康意识的公共卫生政策和应对措施提供信息,为未来的流行病或其他危害做好准备。
    In order to slow the spread of COVID-19, on March 23, 2020, a strict lockdown was implemented in the UK. This was followed by alternating periods of less restrictive lockdowns until most public health restrictions were lifted in the summer of 2021. While these measures were necessary, they significantly affected people\'s daily activities, lifestyles, and mental well-being.This paper presents a longitudinal research study that focused on females aged 55 + in the UK, aiming to understand how COVID-19 and the subsequent 15-month period of lockdowns affected their lifestyles and emotions. The study collected data through online surveys, where respondents reported the frequency and mode of access to activities, and their positive and negative emotional experiences during distinct study phases that encompassed both lockdown and less strict periods.In contrast to previous studies highlighting vulnerabilities for females and the elderly during lockdowns, this research found that the studied group maintained an overall positive outlook throughout the study period and successfully adapted to the lockdowns by increasing their engagement in certain activities, in particular, activities like \'getting active\'. In addition, our findings indicate rapid adaptive behaviour change towards many online activities, such as cultural activities. However, the study also revealed negative emotions and a decrease in some activities during the second lockdown in 2020 and the subsequent lockdowns in 2021, underscoring the challenges inherent in prolonged periods of confinement. In addition, the study found negative affect associated with some activities, including working and studying from home.The findings provide valuable insights into how females aged over 55 coped with stressful circumstances, which can inform the development of resilient and mental health-conscious public health policies and responses in preparation for future pandemics or other hazards.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    人们普遍认为,COVID-19封锁期间日常活动表现的中断影响了健康,但是需要更好地了解特定活动的受限表现如何与健康相关。这项横断面研究回答了以下问题:在COVID-19封锁期间,16项日常活动的表现与健康相关的变化如何?共有116名参与者完成了一项在线调查,对他们在COVID-19封锁之前和期间的健康状况进行了评估,并将他们对COVID-19之前16项活动的表现与封锁期间的表现进行了比较。使用多元逐步线性回归分析来估计封锁期间自我报告的活动变化与同时(封锁期间)健康状况之间的关系。同时控制前COVID-19的健康状况。最终模型中只保留了与锁定健康状况唯一且显著相关的活动变化。COVID-19之前的健康状况占COVID-19封锁期间健康状况差异的3.7%(P=0.039)。在控制COVID-19之前的健康状况后,五种类型的活动对封锁期间的健康状况有显著和独特的预测作用,合计占差异的48.3%。这些活动和它们所占的差异是休息和睡眠(29.5%,P<0.001),游戏和娱乐活动(8%,P<0.001),工作(4.8%,P=0.002),个人卫生(3.2%,P=0.01),和健康饮食(2.8%,P=0.013)。研究表明,当活动的参与受到封锁或类似因素的限制时,应在政策或干预措施中优先考虑这五种类型的活动。
    The disruption in daily activity performance during COVID-19 lockdowns is widely understood to have impacted health, but a better understanding of how restricted performance of specific activities are associated with health is needed. This cross-sectional study answers the following question: How were changes in the performance of 16 daily activities associated with health during COVID-19 lockdowns? A total of 116 participants completed an online survey rating their health before and during COVID-19 lockdowns and comparing their recollection of the performance of 16 activities before COVID-19 with their performance during lockdowns. Multiple stepwise linear regression analysis was used to estimate the relationship between self-reported changes in activities during lockdowns and concurrent (during-lockdown) health status, while controlling for pre-COVID-19 health status. Only changes in activities that were uniquely and significantly associated with lockdown health status were retained in the final model. Health before COVID-19 accounted for 3.7% (P = 0.039) of the variance in health during COVID-19 lockdowns. After controlling for health before COVID-19, five types of activity were significantly and uniquely predictive of health during lockdowns, together accounting for 48.3% of the variance. These activities and the variances they accounted for were rest and sleep (29.5%, P < 0.001), play and recreational activities (8%, P < 0.001), work (4.8%, P = 0.002), personal hygiene (3.2%, P = 0.01), and healthy eating (2.8%, P = 0.013). The study suggests that these five types of activity should be prioritized in policy or interventions when participation in activity is constrained by lockdowns or comparable factors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    2020年3月21日,第一例COVID-19在乌干达确诊。3月30日开始全面封锁,5月5日至6月30日逐步解除封锁。3月25日,坎帕拉首都城市管理局组织了一个免费呼叫中心,以回应公众对COVID-19和封锁的担忧。我们记录了呼叫中心的设置和使用情况,并分析了公众提出的关键问题。
    通过大坎帕拉的媒体平台建立并传播了两条热线。呼叫中心每天24小时开放,每周7天。我们抽象了2020年3月25日至6月30日的来电数据。我们将呼叫数据分为几类,并对封锁期间提出的公众担忧进行了描述性分析。
    在10,167个电话中,三分之二(6,578;64.7%)涉及获得卫生服务,1,565(15.4%)是关于社会服务,1,375人(13.5%)涉及与COVID-19相关的问题。大约三分之一(2152;32.7%)的关于获得医疗服务的电话是非新冠肺炎相关紧急情况患者的救护车请求。关于社会服务的电话中约有四分之三是食品和救济物品的请求(1,184;75.7%)。关于COVID-19的电话中有一半(730;53.1%)寻求疾病相关信息。
    在坎帕拉的COVID-19封锁期间,公众使用了免费呼叫中心。来电者更关心获得基本卫生服务,与COVID-19疾病无关。在与公共卫生紧急情况有关的封锁之前,重要的是要计划基本服务的连续性。
    UNASSIGNED: on March 21, 2020, the first case of COVID-19 was confirmed in Uganda. A total lockdown was initiated on March 30 which was gradually lifted May 5-June 30. On March 25, a toll-free call center was organized at the Kampala Capital City Authority to respond to public concerns about COVID-19 and the lockdown. We documented the set-up and use of the call center and analyzed key concerns raised by the public.
    UNASSIGNED: two hotlines were established and disseminated through media platforms in Greater Kampala. The call center was open 24 hours a day and 7 days a week. We abstracted data on incoming calls from March 25 to June 30, 2020. We summarized call data into categories and conducted descriptive analyses of public concerns raised during the lockdown.
    UNASSIGNED: among 10,167 calls, two-thirds (6,578; 64.7%) involved access to health services, 1,565 (15.4%) were about social services, and 1,375 (13.5%) involved COVID-19-related issues. Approximately one-third (2,152; 32.7%) of calls about access to health services were requests for ambulances for patients with non-COVID-19-related emergencies. About three-quarters of calls about social services were requests for food and relief items (1,184; 75.7%). Half of the calls about COVID-19 (730; 53.1%) sought disease-related information.
    UNASSIGNED: the toll-free call center was used by the public during the COVID-19 lockdown in Kampala. Callers were more concerned about access to essential health services, non-related to COVID-19 disease. It is important to plan for continuity of essential services before a public health emergency-related lockdown.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究使用强加的控制技术和疫苗接种博弈论来研究具有暂时性或逐渐减弱的免疫力的疾病动力学。我们的模型使用ABC分数阶导数机制来显示非药物干预的效果,例如个人保护或意识,检疫,和隔离,以模拟针对在无限且均匀分布的人群中传播的传染病的基本控制策略。一项全面的进化博弈论研究量化了人们疫苗接种选择的重大影响,政府部队参与疫苗接种计划,以改善强制性控制措施,以减少疫情传播。该模型使用上述干预选项作为控制策略,以减少人类社会中的疾病患病率。再一次,我们的模拟结果表明,当疾病传播得更快时,组合控制策略会非常有效。缓慢的传播速度减缓了流行病的爆发,但是适度的控制技术可以重建无病平衡。预防接种调节三个阶段之间的边界,在个人保护的同时,检疫,隔离方法减少了现有场所的疾病传播。因此,成功地将这三种干预措施结合起来,减少了流行病或大流行的规模,由线图和3D表面图表示。第一次,我们使用分数阶导数来显示阶段描绘的轨迹图,以显示模型的动力学,如果免疫以特定的速度减弱,考虑各种疫苗接种成本和有效性设置。
    This study uses imposed control techniques and vaccination game theory to study disease dynamics with transitory or diminishing immunity. Our model uses the ABC fractional-order derivative mechanism to show the effect of non-pharmaceutical interventions such as personal protection or awareness, quarantine, and isolation to simulate the essential control strategies against an infectious disease spread in an infinite and uniformly distributed population. A comprehensive evolutionary game theory study quantified the significant influence of people\'s vaccination choices, with government forces participating in vaccination programs to improve obligatory control measures to reduce epidemic spread. This model uses the intervention options described above as a control strategy to reduce disease prevalence in human societies. Again, our simulated results show that a combined control strategy works exquisitely when the disease spreads even faster. A sluggish dissemination rate slows an epidemic outbreak, but modest control techniques can reestablish a disease-free equilibrium. Preventive vaccination regulates the border between the three phases, while personal protection, quarantine, and isolation methods reduce disease transmission in existing places. Thus, successfully combining these three intervention measures reduces epidemic or pandemic size, as represented by line graphs and 3D surface diagrams. For the first time, we use a fractional-order derivate to display the phase-portrayed trajectory graph to show the model\'s dynamics if immunity wanes at a specific pace, considering various vaccination cost and effectiveness settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    缺乏身体活动和久坐行为与心血管疾病风险增加有关,感染和痴呆症,以及给医疗保健系统带来巨大的经济负担。旨在减少病毒传播的COVID-19大流行封锁措施的实施对身体活动的机会提出了挑战。这项研究调查了英国首次COVID-19封锁如何影响心血管疾病风险较高的老年人客观测量的身体活动。
    我们研究了48名年龄在55-74岁(81.3%女性),自我报告PA水平<90分钟/周,QRISK2评分≥10(表明未来10年发生重大心血管事件的风险≥10%),无轻度认知障碍或痴呆的个体。使用客观的基于手腕的活动监测器收集身体活动数据,并在三个时间段进行分析,通常活动(大流行前),收集了英国开始就限制社交联系提出建议并最终在英国第一个封锁期(2020年1月27日和2020年6月7日)的预防阶段。使用线性混合效应模型对数据进行分析,以研究测量的12周期间的PA水平。BMI的影响,年龄,还检查了3个测量期间的剥夺评分和PA基线水平.进行了焦点小组和个人访谈,和数据进行了主题分析。
    平均每日步数(降低-34%,p<0.001)和主动能量消耗(降低-26%,与通常的活动期相比,p<0.001)在预防期明显较低。在英国封锁期间,身体活动仍然很低。BMI较低的参与者从事的体力活动明显更多(每天步数增加45%p<0.001),而70岁以上的参与者在12周内的体力活动比70岁以下的参与者多(每天步数增加23%p<0.007)。COVID-19感染的风险和由于封锁措施而受到的限制意味着一些人不得不找到保持身体活跃的替代方法。参与者描述了缺乏使用设施的机会以及对与COVID-19相关的健康的担忧,这是在封锁期间进行体育锻炼的障碍。对一些人来说,这导致转向不那么有条理的活动,如园艺或散步。
    所提供的数据显示,COVID-19大流行期间的封锁措施显着减少了有心血管疾病风险的老年人的体育锻炼,特别是那些体重指数较高的人。为了支持这个人群在未来的封锁期间保持活跃,需要一个多方面的战略,强调社会心理益处和以家庭为基础的体力活动。MedEx-UK研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT03673722)预先注册。
    UNASSIGNED: Physical inactivity and sedentary behaviour are linked to increased risk of cardiovascular disease, infections and dementia, as well as placing a significant economic burden on healthcare systems. The implementation of COVID-19 pandemic lockdown measures aimed at reducing virus transmission posed challenges to the opportunity to be physically active. This study investigates how the first UK COVID-19 lockdown affected objectively measured physical activity in older adults at higher risk of cardiovascular disease.
    UNASSIGNED: We studied 48 individuals aged 55-74 years (81.3% female) with self-reported PA levels < 90 min/week and a QRISK2 score ≥ 10 (indicative of a ≥ 10% risk of a major cardiovascular event in the next 10 years) without mild cognitive impairment or dementia. Physical activity data was collected using objective wrist-based activity monitors and analysed across three time periods, usual activity (pre-pandemic), the precautionary phase when the UK began advising on limiting social contact and finally during the first UK lockdown period was collected (27 January 2020 and 07 June 2020). Data was analysed using linear mixed effects model was used to investigate PA levels over the measured 12-week period. Effects of BMI, age, deprivation score and baseline PA levels on PA across the three measurement periods were also examined. Focus-group and individual interviews were conducted, and data were thematically analysed.
    UNASSIGNED: Average daily step count (-34% lower, p < 0.001) and active energy expenditure (-26% lower, p < 0.001) were significantly lower during the precautionary period compared with the usual activity period. Physical activity remained low during the UK lockdown period. Participants with a lower BMI engaged in significantly more (+45% higher daily steps p < 0.001) physical activity and those over 70 years old were more physically active than those under 70 years across the 12-week period (+23% higher daily steps p < 0.007). The risk of COVID-19 infection and restrictions because of lockdown measures meant some individuals had to find alternative methods to staying physical active. Participants described a lack of access to facilities and concerns over health related to COVID-19 as barriers to engaging in physical activity during lockdown. For some, this resulted in a shift towards less structured activities such as gardening or going for a walk.
    UNASSIGNED: The data presented shows that lockdown measures during the COVID-19 pandemic significantly reduced physical activity among older individuals at risk of cardiovascular disease, particularly those with a higher body mass index. To support this population group in staying active during future lockdowns, a multifaceted strategy is needed, emphasizing psychosocial benefits and home-based physical activity. The MedEx-UK study was pre-registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03673722).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    使用非药物干预(NPI),比如封锁,社会距离和学校关闭,针对COVID-19疫情的争论,特别是对弱势群体可能产生的负面影响,包括儿童和青少年。因此,本研究旨在量化与前3年相比,NPI对2年大流行期间儿科住院趋势的影响。还根据采用的NPI类型考虑了两个大流行阶段。
    这是一个多中心,在艾米利亚-罗马涅地区的12家医院进行的准实验性前后研究,意大利北部,以NPI实施为干预事件。在NPI开始实施之前的3年(2020年3月)构成了大流行前阶段。随后的两年进一步细分为学校关闭阶段(截至2020年9月)和随后的缓解措施阶段,限制不那么严格。选择关闭学校作为划界,因为它特别关系到年轻人。应用中断时间序列(ITS)回归分析来计算表现出最大变化的诊断类别的住院率比率(HRR)。ITS允许估计可归因于干预的变化,在即时(水平变化)和持续(斜率变化)效应方面,同时考虑干预前的长期趋势。
    总的来说,在60个月的研究中有84,368例。与大流行前的几年相比,在学校关闭期间和以下缓解措施阶段,住院率在统计上显著下降了35%和19%,分别。最大的减少记录为“呼吸系统疾病,“而“精神障碍”类别在缓解措施期间显着增加。ITS分析证实,在学校关闭期间,呼吸系统疾病的水平变化有较高的降低(HRR0.19,95CI0.08-0.47),在制定缓解措施时,水平变化的降低类似但较小。在学校关闭期间,精神障碍的水平变化显着降低(HRR0.50,95CI0.30-0.82),但在缓解措施期间增加了28%(HRR1.28,95CI0.98-1.69)。
    我们的研究结果提供了有关COVID-19NPI影响的信息,这些信息可能会在未来的健康危机中为公共卫生政策提供信息,计划有效的控制和预防干预措施,并在需要时提供目标资源。
    The use of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs), such as lockdowns, social distancing and school closures, against the COVID-19 epidemic is debated, particularly for the possible negative effects on vulnerable populations, including children and adolescents. This study therefore aimed to quantify the impact of NPIs on the trend of pediatric hospitalizations during 2 years of pandemic compared to the previous 3 years, also considering two pandemic phases according to the type of adopted NPIs.
    This is a multicenter, quasi-experimental before-after study conducted in 12 hospitals of the Emilia-Romagna Region, Northern Italy, with NPI implementation as the intervention event. The 3 years preceding the beginning of NPI implementation (in March 2020) constituted the pre-pandemic phase. The subsequent 2 years were further subdivided into a school closure phase (up to September 2020) and a subsequent mitigation measures phase with less stringent restrictions. School closure was chosen as delimitation as it particularly concerns young people. Interrupted Time Series (ITS) regression analysis was applied to calculate Hospitalization Rate Ratios (HRR) on the diagnostic categories exhibiting the greatest variation. ITS allows the estimation of changes attributable to an intervention, both in terms of immediate (level change) and sustained (slope change) effects, while accounting for pre-intervention secular trends.
    Overall, in the 60 months of the study there were 84,368 cases. Compared to the pre-pandemic years, statistically significant 35 and 19% decreases in hospitalizations were observed during school closure and in the following mitigation measures phase, respectively. The greatest reduction was recorded for \"Respiratory Diseases,\" whereas the \"Mental Disorders\" category exhibited a significant increase during mitigation measures. ITS analysis confirms a high reduction of level change during school closure for Respiratory Diseases (HRR 0.19, 95%CI 0.08-0.47) and a similar but smaller significant reduction when mitigation measures were enacted. Level change for Mental Disorders significantly decreased during school closure (HRR 0.50, 95%CI 0.30-0.82) but increased during mitigation measures by 28% (HRR 1.28, 95%CI 0.98-1.69).
    Our findings provide information on the impact of COVID-19 NPIs which may inform public health policies in future health crises, plan effective control and preventative interventions and target resources where needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号