Experimental studies showed that central polydactyly, syndactyly, and cleft hand might appear when the same teratogenic factor acts on embryos at the same developmental stage. These observations and some clinical cases support the concept that a common etiologic mechanism is involved in the development of these malformations. We report a clinical case that demonstrates the association previously observed in experimental studies. Here, a patient with unilateral nonsyndromic cleft hand, central polydactyly, first web syndactyly, osseous syndactyly between the ring and long fingers, and minor thumb hypoplasia was presented.

Background: Cleft hand is a rare and congenital deformity that affects hands and feet and can be associated with other malformations. The objective was to evaluate the epidemiological and clinical aspects of cleft hand patient in a case series. Methods: Baseline characteristics associated with this deformity, such as sociodemographic characteristics, affected upper limb side, family history, clinical manifestations, and the degree of deficiency according to Barsky, Manske and Halikis, and Valenti classifications, were analyzed in 38 patients treated in the Department of Orthopedic Surgery of the Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, Brazil. Results: A predominance of typical hands as classified by Barsky, types II and IV by Manske and Halikis, and type IV by Valenti was found. A high frequency of typical cases (55.3%), as defined by Barsky, had a positive family history (P = .031) and were associated with other clinical manifestations (44.7%), when compared with atypical cleft hand patients (P < .001). Conclusion: In our study, there were more typical cleft hands than atypical, and they were more commonly associated with family history and other clinical manifestations.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the implications of the transverse bone in cleft hand by assessing outcomes after reconstruction in comparison with a control group.
METHODS: This study is a retrospective review of 23 hands in 18 patients following surgical reconstruction of the cleft hand. Eleven hands had a transverse bone component, and 12 hands (control group) did not. Patients and their families were contacted to assess overall satisfaction following reconstruction. Clinical and radiographic records were reviewed to assess aesthetic and functional outcomes, the need for additional surgery, and radiographic divergence angles.
RESULTS: There was no difference in aesthetic or functional subjective outcomes. There was no statistically significant difference in any objective outcome measure between the two groups. The use of the cleft for pinch was more dependent on the status of the index finger and the preoperative thumb-index webspace rather than the presence of a transverse bone. Eleven (4 transverse and 7 control) hands required additional surgery to address abnormal function or posture of the index and ring fingers. Preoperative radiographic divergence angles were larger in the transverse bone group than in the control group, whereas postoperative divergence angles were nearly equivalent.
CONCLUSIONS: Similar outcomes between the two groups demonstrate that the presence of a transverse bone in cleft hand was not associated with worse outcomes following cleft reconstruction. Preoperative narrowing of the thumb webspace and postoperative index finger metacarpophalangeal joint abnormality are associated with worse functional outcomes.
METHODS: Therapeutic Level III.