carotid arteries

颈动脉
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Cervical lipomas accompanied by neurovascular compression are extremely rare and require surgical treatment in case of appropriate symptoms. The preferable method is gross total resection, as otherwise they tend to recur. Invasive growth is not typical for lipomas. However, large tumors can involve adjacent nerves and vessels and significantly complicate resection.
    METHODS: We present a 57-year-old patient who underwent resection of giant soft tissue cervical lipoma invading neurovascular bundle and compressing the oropharynx and esophagus with dysphagia and positional asphyxia. The patient was followed-up for previous 5 years. Resection was necessary due to tumor enlargement with appropriate symptoms. Searching for literature data was performed in the Pubmed, Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and eLibrary databases.
    CONCLUSIONS: Gross total resection of 7-cm tumor was accompanied by mobilization of hypoglossal and vagus nerves, common, external and internal carotid arteries and jugular vein with repositioning of the oropharynx and esophagus. There was mild Horner\'s syndrome in early postoperative period. The patient was discharged in 4 days after surgery with regression of complaints. We found only 5 reports describing giant cervical lipomas invading neurovascular bundle.
    CONCLUSIONS: Giant cervical lipomas are extremely rare, and total resection with preservation of critical structures is possible in a specialized hospital.
    Липомы, сопровождающиеся компрессией сосудисто-нервного пучка шеи, встречаются крайне редко и требуют хирургического лечения в случаях появления соответствующей симптоматики. Предпочтительным методом является радикальное удаление, так как в противном случае они склонны рецидивировать. Для липом не характерен инвазивный рост, однако, достигая больших размеров, они могут вовлекать в себя прилежащие нервные и сосудистые структуры, что значительно затрудняет радикальную хирургическую резекцию.
    UNASSIGNED: В статье представлено наблюдение пациента 57 лет, которому было произведено удаление гигантской липомы мягких тканей шеи, распространяющейся в сосудисто-нервный пучок и приводящей к компрессии ротоглотки, пищевода, дисфагии и позиционной асфиксии при повороте головы. Пациент наблюдался по поводу образования в течение 5 лет, в связи с увеличением образования в динамике и нарастанием жалоб было принято решение об его удалении. Произведен поиск литературы по ключевым словам в научных базах данных PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library и eLibrary.
    UNASSIGNED: В ходе операции опухоль 7 см в диаметре была полностью удалена, из нее выделены и сохранены подъязычный, блуждающий нервы, общая, наружная и внутренняя сонные артерии и яремная вена, сдавленные ротоглотка и пищевод приняли нормальное положение. В раннем послеоперационном периоде отмечалось появление минимально выраженного синдрома Горнера, пациент был выписан из клиники на 4-е сутки после операции с регрессом жалоб. При поиске литературы было найдено лишь 5 работ, описывающих гигантские липомы шеи с вовлечением сосудисто-нервного пучка.
    UNASSIGNED: Гигантские липомы шеи встречаются крайне редко, а их радикальное удаление с сохранением критических структур возможно в условиях специализированного стационара.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估经桡动脉途径用于外周血管介入治疗的安全性和可行性。
    方法:MEDLINE和Embase。
    方法:MEDLINE和Embase数据库被搜索到2023年6月,以确定调查下肢外周血管干预结果的研究,颈动脉,经桡动脉和内脏动脉经股动脉入路。主要结果是手术失败率。次要结果是总通路部位并发症,轻微和大出血,中风,进入血管闭塞,程序时间,透视时间,和对比体积。
    结果:8项随机对照试验和29项观察性研究共得到70882例经桡动脉治疗的患者(n=2616)与经股动脉入路(n=68338)。总体故障率为2.3±0.7%,经桡动脉入路的手术失败率明显高于经股动脉入路(3.9±0.7%vs.1.0±0.3%;比值比[OR]3.07,95%置信区间[CI]1.84-5.12;I2=32%;p<.001)。亚组分析显示,下肢干预的失败率最高,经桡骨与下肢干预的失败率为12.4±4.9%。经股动脉入路4.0±1.2%。相反,经桡动脉入路的手术并发症在统计学上显著较少(OR0.64,95%CI0.45-0.91;I2=36%;p=.010).经桡动脉途径的轻微出血在统计学上显著减少(OR0.52,95%CI0.31-0.86;I2=30%;p=.010),而大出血和卒中发生率相似.经桡动脉入路的入路血管闭塞多于经股动脉入路(1.9%±0.5%vs.<0.1%±0.0%;p=.004),尽管大多数仍然无症状。程序时间,透视时间,和对比体积都相当。在大多数结果中,等级确定性为低至中等。
    结论:经桡动脉入路与较高的手术失败率相关。经桡动脉入路的总入路并发症和少量出血较低,尽管更频繁的进入血管闭塞。经radial入路可能是一种可行且安全的方法;但是,适当的患者选择势在必行。
    OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of transradial access for peripheral vascular interventions.
    METHODS: MEDLINE and Embase.
    METHODS: MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched to June 2023 to identify studies investigating the outcomes of peripheral vascular interventions in lower extremity, carotid, and visceral arteries via transradial vs. transfemoral access. The primary outcome was procedural failure rate. Secondary outcomes were total access site complications, minor and major bleeding, stroke, access vessel occlusion, procedural time, fluoroscopy time, and contrast volume.
    RESULTS: Eight randomised controlled trials and 29 observational studies yielded a total of 70 882 patients treated via transradial (n = 2 616) vs. transfemoral access (n = 68 338). The overall failure rate was 2.3 ± 0.7%, and the transradial approach was associated with a statistically significantly higher procedural failure rate than the transfemoral approach (3.9 ± 0.7% vs. 1.0 ± 0.3%; odds ratio [OR] 3.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.84 - 5.12; I2 = 32%; p < .001). Subgroup analysis showed the highest failure rate in lower extremity interventions with 12.4 ± 4.9% for transradial vs. 4.0 ± 1.2% for transfemoral access. Conversely, procedural complications were statistically significantly fewer with transradial access for total access site complications (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.45 - 0.91; I2 = 36%; p = .010). Minor bleeding was statistically significantly less with the transradial approach (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.31 - 0.86; I2 = 30%; p = .010), whereas major bleeding and stroke rates were similar. Transradial access had more access vessel occlusion than transfemoral access (1.9% ± 0.5% vs. < 0.1% ± 0.0%; p = .004), although most remained asymptomatic. Procedural time, fluoroscopy time, and contrast volume were all comparable. GRADE certainty was low to moderate in most outcomes.
    CONCLUSIONS: The transradial approach was associated with a higher procedural failure rate. Total access site complications and minor bleeding were lower with the transradial approach, albeit with more frequent access vessel occlusion. Transradial access may be a feasible and safe approach; however, appropriate patient selection is imperative.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由摄入异物(FB)的腔外迁移引起的颈动脉并发症很少见,但可能危及生命。以前关于该主题的数据主要包括孤立病例报告,在指导临床决策所必需的综合证据方面留下了空白。在这篇文章中,我们提供一个叙述性的回顾和一个新的病例报告,旨在提供广泛的,以循证观点指导临床实践。搜索策略采用与以下电子数据库中摄入FB的颈动脉并发症相关的关键字:PubMed,Scopus,谷歌学者,和CochraneCentral.筛选涉及由两名独立审查员进行标准化数据提取,重点关注符合纳入标准的摘要,并将非英语文献和非相关研究排除在进一步分析之外。此外,我们提出了一个新的病例报告,该病例通过独特的手术方法成功治疗。总的来说,最终共纳入16例病例报告,关于临床表现的数据,诊断策略和发现,提取手术管理和结果,列表,并讨论。在摄入FB的腔外迁移引起的颈动脉并发症中,由于潜在的轻度症状和阴性的一级检查,高度的临床怀疑是至关重要的。计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描在准确诊断和手术计划中起着关键作用,与颈部超声检查一起检测并发症。根据颈动脉受累的严重程度量身定制的手术策略,包括严重血管受累的静脉补片移植物,对患者的最佳治疗结果至关重要。作为一种新奇,在我们的案例报告中,成功地采用了颈动脉分流术,而不是长时间的颈动脉钳夹,以降低相关神经系统后遗症的风险。可以得出结论,诊断和管理来自摄入FB的腔外迁移的颈动脉并发症仍然具有挑战性,需要多学科方法.
    Carotid complications resulting from extra-luminal migration of ingested foreign bodies (FB) are rare but potentially life-threatening. Previous data on the topic predominantly comprises isolated case reports, leaving a gap in comprehensive evidence necessary to guide clinical decision-making. In this article, we offer a narrative review alongside a novel case report, aimed at providing a broad, evidence-based perspective on the topic to guide clinical practice. The search strategy employed keywords related to carotid artery complications from ingested FB across the following electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central. Screening involved standardized data extraction by two independent reviewers, with a focus on abstracts meeting inclusion criteria and excluding non-English literature and non-relevant studies from further analysis. Moreover, we present a novel case report on the topic that was successfully managed using a unique surgical approach. Overall, a total of sixteen case reports were finally included, data on clinical presentations, diagnostic strategies and findings, surgical management and outcome were extracted, tabulated, and discussed. In carotid complications from extra-luminal migration of ingested FB, high clinical suspicion is crucial due to potentially mild symptoms and negative first-level examinations. Computed tomography (CT) scan plays a pivotal role for accurate diagnosis and surgical planning, along with neck ultrasound to detect complications. Tailored surgical strategies based on the severity of carotid involvement, including venous patch grafts in severe vessels involvement, are crucial for optimal patient outcomes. As a novelty, in our case report, carotid shunt was successfully employed instead of prolonged carotid clamping to reduce the risk of associated neurological sequelae. It could be concluded that, diagnosis and managing carotid complications from extra-luminal migration of ingested FB remains challenging and a multidisciplinary approach is warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:颈动脉分叉(CB)的垂直水平通常显示在甲状软骨的上缘。很少有研究观察到CB的垂直地形。旨在研究CB的垂直位置,即椎骨和颈椎前路标志。
    方法:记录了147张CT血管造影照片,记录了椎体和颈椎前路标志的CB垂直水平。CB与前标志有关的地形图分为七种类型:(1)在甲状软骨的上缘;(2)舌骨和甲状软骨之间;(3)在舌骨水平;(4)在舌骨和下颌骨之间;(5)性腺下或性腺上CB;(6)下颈椎水平;(7)胸内。
    结果:CB最常见的位置是C3(27.21%),C3/C4(26.19%)和C4(25.51%)。CB的双边对称性在51.7%中发现,除了C2和C5/C6。找不到类型7,类型3发生在39.12%,类型2占24.49%,类型1占13.95%,类型4占13.61%,类型5占6.12%,类型6占2.72%(294个CBs)。前路型双侧对称性占59.86%。性别与CB的左右类型和椎骨水平之间存在统计学上的显着相关性。
    结论:CB的垂直形貌是高度可变的,并且具有与性别相关的特异性。这个细节应该包括在解剖学的教学中。外科医生和干预人员应根据具体情况更好地记录颈动脉解剖结构。
    OBJECTIVE: The vertical level of carotid bifurcation (CB) is commonly indicated at the superior margin of the thyroid cartilage. Few studies observed the CB vertical topography. It was aimed at studying the vertical location of the CB as referred to vertebral and anterior cervical landmarks.
    METHODS: An archived lot of 147 computed tomography angiograms was documented for the vertical level of CB referred to vertebral and anterior cervical landmarks. The topography of the CB in relation to anterior landmarks was classified into seven types: (1) at the superior margin of the thyroid cartilage; (2) between the hyoid and the thyroid cartilage; (3) at the hyoid level; (4) between the hyoid and mandible; (5) subgonial or supragonial CB; (6) lower cervical level; (7) intrathoracic.
    RESULTS: The most common locations of CB were at C3 (27.21%), C3/C4 (26.19%) and C4 (25.51%). Bilateral symmetry of CB was found in 51.7%, except for C2 and C5/C6. Type 7 was not found, type 3 occurred in 39.12%, type 2 in 24.49%, type 1 in 13.95%, type 4 in 13.61%, type 5 in 6.12%, and type 6 in 2.72% (294 CBs). Bilateral symmetry of anterior types was found in 59.86%. Statistically significant correlations were found between sex and both left and right types and vertebral levels of CB.
    CONCLUSIONS: The vertical topography of the CB is highly variable and has sex-related specificity. This detail should be included in the teaching of anatomy. Surgeons and interventionists should better document the carotid anatomy on a case-by-case basis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)是重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的首选治疗方法。经颈动脉(TCA)或经腋窝/锁骨下(TAx/Sc)是更安全且侵入性较小的非股骨入路,难以或不可能获得经股通道的地方。
    方法:这项荟萃分析是在PROSPERO(CRD42023482842)注册后基于PRISMA指南进行的。进行这项荟萃分析是为了比较经颈动脉和经腋窝/锁骨下途径用于TAVR的安全性,包括从开始到2023年10月的研究。
    结果:七项研究共6227例患者纳入分析(TCA:2566;TAx/Sc:3661)。经颈动脉TAVR方法对卒中和全因死亡率的复合趋势有利(OR0.79,CI0.60-1.04),全因死亡率,中风,主要血管并发症,和永久性起搏器的新需求,尽管这些在统计上微不足道。在对基于领土的研究结果(美国与法国)进行次级分析时,全因死亡率的复合结局,中风和大出血(OR0.54,CI0.54-0.81),卒中和全因死亡率的复合(OR0.64,CI0.50-0.81),和卒中/TIA(OR0.53,CI0.39-0.73)在美国队列中使用TCA方法治疗的患者中显示出较低的发生几率.
    结论:总体而言,经颈动脉入路对复合(卒中和全因死亡率)和个体结局(卒中,全因死亡率,等。).根据研究的地理位置,观察到的结果存在显著差异。将两种方法与代表性样本进行比较的大型前瞻性随机临床试验对于指导临床医生选择这些方法是必要的。
    BACKGROUND: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) is the treatment of choice in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Transcarotid (TCa) or Trans-axillary/subclavian (TAx/Sc) are safer and less invasive non-femoral approaches, where transfemoral access is difficult or impossible to obtain.
    METHODS: This meta-analysis was performed based on PRISMA guidelines after registering in PROSPERO (CRD42023482842). This meta-analysis was performed to compare the safety of the transcarotid and trans-axillary/subclavian approach for TAVR including studies from inception to October 2023.
    RESULTS: Seven studies with a total of 6227 patients were included in the analysis (TCa: 2566; TAx/Sc: 3661). Transcarotid TAVR approach had a favorable trend for composite of stroke and all-cause mortality (OR 0.79, CI 0.60-1.04), all-cause mortality, stroke, major vascular complication, and new requirement of permanent pacemaker though those were statistically insignificant. On sub-analysis of the results of the studies based on the territory (USA vs French), composite outcome of all cause mortality, stroke and major bleeding (OR 0.54, CI 0.54-0.81), composite of stroke and all cause mortality (OR 0.64, CI 0.50-0.81), and stroke/TIA (OR 0.53, CI 0.39-0.73) showed lower odds of occurrence among patient managed with TCa approach in the American cohort.
    CONCLUSIONS: Overall, transcarotid approach had favorable though statistically insignificant odds for composite (stroke and all-cause mortality) and individual outcomes (stroke, all-cause mortality, etc.). There are significant variations in observed outcomes based on study\'s geographic location. Large prospective randomized clinical trials comparing the two approaches with representative samples are necessary to guide the clinicians in choosing among these approaches.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:确定通气患者的液体反应性的非侵入性且准确的方法将有助于减少不必要的液体给药。尽管颈动脉超声已经为此目的进行了研究,最近发表了几项研究。我们进行了更新的系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估颈动脉超声作为预测通气患者液体反应性的工具的准确性。
    方法:有资格审查的研究调查了颈动脉超声参数在预测通气患者液体反应性方面的准确性,使用敏感性和特异性作为诊断准确性的标志物(国际前瞻性系统审查注册[PROSPERO]CRD42022380284)。所有纳入的研究都必须使用独立的方法来确定心输出量,并排除自发通气的患者。检索了6个书目数据库和2个试验登记处。Medline,Embase,Emcare,APAPsycInfo,CINAHL,并在2022年11月4日搜索了Cochrane图书馆。Clinicaltrials.gov和澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心于2023年2月24日进行了搜索。结果汇总,在可能的情况下进行荟萃分析,和分层汇总接收器工作特征模型用于比较颈动脉超声参数。使用诊断准确性研究质量评估(QUADAS)工具和建议分级评估偏差和证据质量。评估,发展,和评估(等级)指南。
    结果:纳入了13项前瞻性临床研究(n=648例患者),代表677个交付量的扩张,378次液体反应性发作(58.3%)。对颈动脉多普勒峰值速度(ΔCDPV)变化的荟萃分析得出的敏感性为0.79(95%置信区间[CI],0.74-0.84),特异性为0.85(95%CI,0.76-0.90)。与招聘方法有关的偏差风险,评估了指数测试与参考标准和排除性临床标准的独立性.总体证据质量较低。研究设计异质性,包括缺乏明确的参数截止,限制了我们结果的概括性。
    结论:在本荟萃分析中,我们发现,现有文献支持颈动脉超声对机械通气成人液体反应性的预测能力.ΔCDPV在某些情况下可能是准确的颈动脉参数。需要进一步的高质量研究和更均匀的设计来进一步验证该技术。
    BACKGROUND: A noninvasive and accurate method of determining fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients would help to mitigate unnecessary fluid administration. Although carotid ultrasound has been previously studied for this purpose, several studies have recently been published. We performed an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the accuracy of carotid ultrasound as a tool to predict fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients.
    METHODS: Studies eligible for review investigated the accuracy of carotid ultrasound parameters in predicting fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients, using sensitivity and specificity as markers of diagnostic accuracy (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews [PROSPERO] CRD42022380284). All included studies had to use an independent method of determining cardiac output and exclude spontaneously ventilated patients. Six bibliographic databases and 2 trial registries were searched. Medline, Embase, Emcare, APA PsycInfo, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library were searched on November 4, 2022. Clinicaltrials.gov and Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry were searched on February 24, 2023. Results were pooled, meta-analysis was conducted where possible, and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic models were used to compare carotid ultrasound parameters. Bias and evidence quality were assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) tool and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) guidelines.
    RESULTS: Thirteen prospective clinical studies were included (n = 648 patients), representing 677 deliveries of volume expansion, with 378 episodes of fluid responsiveness (58.3%). A meta-analysis of change in carotid Doppler peak velocity (∆CDPV) yielded a sensitivity of 0.79 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-0.84) and a specificity of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.76-0.90). Risk of bias relating to recruitment methodology, the independence of index testing to reference standards and exclusionary clinical criteria were evaluated. Overall quality of evidence was low. Study design heterogeneity, including a lack of clear parameter cutoffs, limited the generalizability of our results.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this meta-analysis, we found that existing literature supports the ability of carotid ultrasound to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated adults. ∆CDPV may be an accurate carotid parameter in certain contexts. Further high-quality studies with more homogenous designs are needed to further validate this technology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    这项系统评价旨在确定男性和女性在颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)和颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)后的性别特异性结局。包括经股动脉和经颈动脉。使用PubMed上归因于颈动脉干预的关键术语,对2000年1月至2022年12月发表的文献进行了检索。比较干预后结果指标的研究(即,心肌梗死[MI],脑血管意外[CVA]或中风,回顾了男性和女性患者的长期死亡率)。遵循系统审查和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目。总的来说,所有研究报告围手术期并发症发生率较低.在没有根据术前症状状态对结局进行分层的研究中,围手术期卒中或MIs的发生率无显著性别差异.两项研究,然而,注意到接受CEA的男性患者30日死亡率高于女性患者.对接受CEA的无症状患者的分析显示围手术期MIs无差异(女性:0%至1.8%,男性:0.4%至4.3%),CVA的比率相似(女性:0.8%至5%,男性:0.8%至4.9%),长期死亡率结局无显著差异。或者,接受CEA的有症状患者报告女性患者的CVA发生率高于女性患者男性患者(7.7%v6.2%),女性患者的死亡率更高(1%v0.7%)。在没有通过症状学对结果进行分层的研究中,对于接受CAS的患者,性别间30日结局无差异.接受CAS的无症状患者在围手术期MIs中表现出相似的发生率(女性:0%至5.9%,男性:0.28%至3.3%),CVA(女性:0.5%至4.1%,男性:0.4%至6.2%),和长期死亡率结局(女性:0%至1.75%,男性:0.2%至1.5%)。接受CAS的症状患者同样报告围手术期MIs的发生率较高(女性:0.3%至7.1%,男性:0%至5.5%),CVA(女性:0%至9.9%,男性:0%至7.6%),和长期死亡率结局(女性:0.6%至7.1%,男性:0.5%至8.2%)。主要血管手术后结果的性别特异性差异已得到充分认可。我们的综述表明,有症状的女性患者在颈动脉介入治疗后有较高的神经和心脏事件发生率。但无症状的患者不会。
    This systematic review aimed to identify sex-specific outcomes in men and women after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS), including transfemoral and transcarotid. A search of literature published from January 2000 through December 2022 was conducted using key terms attributed to carotid interventions on PubMed. Studies comparing outcome metrics post intervention (ie, myocardial infarction [MI], cerebral vascular accident [CVA] or stroke, and long-term mortality) among male and female patients were reviewed. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. Overall, all studies reported low rates of perioperative complications. Among the studies that did not stratify outcomes by the preoperative symptom status, there were no significant sex differences in rates of perioperative strokes or MIs. Two studies, however, noted a higher rate of 30-day mortality in male patients undergoing CEA than in female patients. Analysis of asymptomatic patients undergoing CEA revealed no difference in perioperative MIs (female: 0% to 1.8% v male: 0.4% to 4.3%), similar rates of CVAs (female: 0.8% to 5% v male: 0.8% to 4.9%), and no significant differences in the long-term mortality outcomes. Alternatively, symptomatic patients undergoing CEA reported a higher rate of CVAs in female patients vs. male patients (7.7% v 6.2%) and showed a higher rate of death in female patients (1% v 0.7%). Among studies that did not stratify outcome by symptomatology, there was no difference in the 30-day outcomes between sexes for patients undergoing CAS. Asymptomatic patients undergoing CAS demonstrated similar incident rates across perioperative MIs (female: 0% to 5.9% v male: 0.28% to 3.3%), CVAs (female: 0.5% to 4.1% v male: 0.4% to 6.2%), and long-term mortality outcomes (female: 0% to 1.75% v male: 0.2% to 1.5%). Symptomatic patients undergoing CAS similarly reported higher incidences of perioperative MIs (female: 0.3% to 7.1% v male: 0% to 5.5%), CVAs (female: 0% to 9.9% v male: 0% to 7.6%), and long-term mortality outcomes (female: 0.6% to 7.1% v male: 0.5% to 8.2%). Sex-specific differences in outcomes after major vascular procedures are well recognized. Our review suggests that symptomatic female patients have a higher incidence of neurologic and cardiac events after carotid interventions, but that asymptomatic patients do not.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:颈动脉网(CaWs)越来越被认为是隐源性急性缺血性卒中(AIS)的病因。由于与CaW相关的复发性缺血性卒中的风险,识别它们很重要。尽管一些研究报告数字减影血管造影和计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)在诊断CaW方面比多普勒超声(DUS)更好,诊断CaW的最佳放射学方法尚待确定。我们的目的是评估DUS与CTA诊断CaW的敏感性和准确性。
    方法:我们搜索了从成立到2022年8月的PUBMED和EMBASE数据库。我们纳入了由DUS和/或CTA诊断的CaW患者的研究,在每个患者中使用两种方法。人口特征,每种方法的诊断报告,并收集组织学报告。与CTA相比,进行描述性分析以及敏感性和准确性估计以评估DUS。
    结果:我们在系统综述中纳入了27篇文章(121例CaW患者)。DUS确定了94例CaW患者和116例CTA患者。DUS漏诊占22.3%(27例),CTA未发现DUS检出CaW占4.13%(5例)。DUS和CTA的准确率为73.6%(95%CI:64.8-81.2%)。与CTA相比,DUS诊断CaW的敏感性为76.7%(95%CI:68.0-84.1%)。DUS最常见的误诊为正常检查(44.4%),动脉粥样硬化(22.2%),解剖(22.2%)。
    结论:DUS诊断CaW的敏感性和准确性中等。在某些未通过CTA鉴定的情况下,它可能会检测到CaW。增加对CaW的识别和特定超声方案可能会增强DUS对CaW的诊断。
    BACKGROUND: Carotid webs (CaWs) are increasingly recognized as a cause of cryptogenic acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Due to the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke associated with CaW, it is important to identify them. Although several studies report digital subtraction angiography and computerized tomography angiography (CTA) to be better at diagnosing CaW than Doppler ultrasound (DUS), it remains to be defined which is the best radiological method to diagnose CaW. Our aim was to evaluate sensitivity and accuracy of DUS compared to CTA for CaW diagnosis.
    METHODS: We searched PUBMED and EMBASE databases from inception through August 2022. We included studies with patients with CaW diagnosed by DUS and/or CTA, in which both methods were used in each patient. Demographic characteristics, diagnostic reports of each method, and histology reports were collected. Descriptive analysis and sensitivity and accuracy estimates were made to evaluate DUS compared to CTA.
    RESULTS: We included 27 articles in the systematic review (121 patients with CaW). DUS identified 94 patients with CaW and CTA 116 patients. DUS missed diagnosis in 22.3% (27 patients) and CTA did not identify CaW detected by DUS in 4.13% (5 patients). Accuracy rate between DUS and CTA was 73.6% (95% CI: 64.8-81.2%). Sensitivity of DUS to diagnose CaW compared to CTA was 76.7% (95% CI: 68.0-84.1%). Most common misdiagnosis with DUS was normal exam (44.4%), atherosclerosis (22.2%), and dissection (22.2%).
    CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity and accuracy of DUS to diagnosis of CaW were moderate. It might detect CaW in some cases in which it was not identified by CTA. Increased recognition of CaW and specific ultrasound protocols may enhance diagnosis of CaW by DUS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    血管内血栓切除术(EVT)是目前治疗急性缺血性中风的标准护理疗法。虽然通过股动脉或桡动脉进入是常规的,通过这些部位的高达20%的EVT在第一次通过时无法进入脑血管系统。这些缺点通常是由于曲折的脉管系统,动脉粥样硬化动脉,和III型主动脉弓,尤其是在老年人群中。最近的研究表明,通过经皮直接颈动脉穿刺(DCP)进入脑血管系统的好处,这可以将手术时间减少一半。然而,目前设计用于股动脉的血管闭合装置(VCD)由于解剖差异而不适合闭合颈动脉。这种未满足的临床需求进一步限制了DCP方法。因此,为了促进这种潜在方法的安全采用,需要专门为颈动脉设计的VCD。在这次审查中,我们概述了当前VCD的主要生物力学特性和缺点,并提出了有效设计和开发颈动脉闭合装置所需的要求。
    Endovascular thrombectomies (EVTs) are the current standard of care therapy for treating acute ischemic strokes. While access through the femoral or radial arteries is routine, up to 20% of EVTs through these sites are unable to access the cerebral vasculature on the first pass. These shortcomings are commonly due to tortuous vasculature, atherosclerotic arteries, and type III aortic arch, seen especially in the elderly population. Recent studies have shown the benefits of accessing the cerebral vasculature through a percutaneous direct carotid puncture (DCP), which can reduce the time of the procedure by half. However, current vascular closure devices (VCDs) designed for the femoral artery are not suited to close the carotid artery due to the anatomical differences. This unmet clinical need further limits a DCP approach. Thus, to foster safe adoption of this potential approach, a VCD designed specifically for the carotid artery is needed. In this review, we outline the major biomechanical properties and shortcomings of current VCDs and propose the requirements necessary to effectively design and develop a carotid closure device.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心血管疾病与非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)之间的关系已被广泛研究。为了更好地汇集这些数据并做出更明确的结论,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估NAFLD与颈动脉中膜和内膜厚度(CIMT)及心血管疾病之间的关系.
    我们搜索了PubMed,奥维德,Scopus,ProQuest,WebofScience,还有Cochrane图书馆,并使用R工作室和“metafor”软件包分析了池化数据。
    最终分析包括总共59项研究,其中16,179例病例和26,120例对照个体。在NAFLD患者中,NAFLD与颈动脉内中膜厚度(CIMT)增加0.1231mm(20.6%)相关(p=0.002,95%置信区间[CI]:0.0462-0.2000)。颈动脉粥样硬化斑块的患病率与NAFLD的发生有显著的相关性,根据基于17项不同研究的荟萃分析(p=0.001,1.28-1.43,95%CI,比值比=1.356).
    CIMT增加的患者更有可能患有NAFLD。需要进行大规模的前瞻性调查来证实这些发现及其预后意义,以及现有干预措施的有效性。
    UNASSIGNED: The relationship between cardiovascular disorders and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has been extensively studied. To better pool this data and make a more definite conclusion, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the association between NAFLD and the thickness of media and intima of carotid artery (CIMT) and cardiovascular disorders.
    UNASSIGNED: We searched PubMed, Ovid, Scopus, ProQuest, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, and analyzed the pooled data using R studio and the \"metafor\" package.
    UNASSIGNED: The final analysis included a total of 59 studies with 16,179 cases and 26,120 control individuals. NAFLD was shown to be associated with an increase of 0.1231 mm (20.6%) in carotid artery intima-media thickness (CIMT) (p = 0.002, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.0462-0.2000) in individuals with NAFLD. The prevalence of atherosclerotic plaques in the carotid arteries and the occurrence of NAFLD are significantly correlated, according to a meta-analysis based on 17 distinct studies (p = 0.001, 1.28-1.43, 95% CI, odds ratio = 1.356).
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with increased CIMT are considerably more likely to have NAFLD. Large prospective investigations are required to corroborate these findings and their prognostic significance, along with the effectiveness of the available interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号