目的:生物标志物作为治疗心力衰竭(HF)患者的预后和治疗效果指标工具至关重要。脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)的系统水平可以增加HF生物标志物的情况,允许增强诊断功效,预后分层,和预测患者对给定治疗干预的反应,因为BDNF是心肌功能的主要指标之一。然而,BDNF是否是可靠的临床生物标志物有待临床验证.因此,我们旨在通过对现有研究的系统评价和荟萃分析来回答这一相关问题.
结果:国际数据库,包括PubMed,Scopus,Embase,和WebofScience,全面搜索评估HF患者与非HF对照组BDNF水平或作为HF并发症预后因素的研究。数据提取并通过随机效应荟萃分析进行分析。计算标准化平均差(SMD)和95%置信区间(CI)以汇集研究结果。我们在最终审查中纳入了11项研究,其中6人进行了荟萃分析.这些研究分析了1420例HF患者,平均年龄65.4±11.2岁。Meta分析显示,HF患者的循环BDNF水平明显低于健康对照组(SMD-2.47,95%CI-4.39至-0.54,P值=0.01)。此外,纽约心脏协会功能分级较高的患者的BDNF水平较低.在个别研究中,不良临床结局如全因死亡率和HF再住院也与较低水平的BDNF相关。
结论:HF患者的BDNF水平降低。最重要的是,我们观察到HF患者的BDNF水平降低与预后不良之间存在关联.我们的研究支持BDNF作为一种易于剂量的诊断和预后的生物标志物在HF的临床实践中实施。需要进一步的研究来具体解决这种能力。
OBJECTIVE: Biomarkers are paramount for managing heart failure (HF) patients as prognostic and therapeutic efficacy index tools. Systemic levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) can add to the HF
biomarker scenario, allowing for potentiated efficacy in diagnosis, prognostic stratification, and prediction of patient response to a given therapeutic intervention because BDNF is one of the primary rulers of myocardial function. Yet, whether BDNF is a reliable clinical
biomarker awaits clinical validation. Hence, we aimed to answer this relevant question via a systematic
review and meta-analysis of existing studies.
RESULTS: International databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and the Web of Science, were comprehensively searched for studies assessing BDNF levels in patients with HF versus non-HF controls or as a prognostic factor for HF complications. Data were extracted and analysed by random-effect meta-analysis. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed to pool the results of studies. We included 11 studies in the final
review, among which six underwent meta-analysis. These studies analysed 1420 HF patients, with a mean age of 65.4 ± 11.2 years. Meta-analysis revealed that patients with HF had significantly lower circulating BDNF levels than healthy controls (SMD -2.47, 95% CI -4.39 to -0.54, P-value = 0.01). Moreover, patients with higher New York Heart Association functional classification had lower levels of BDNF. Adverse clinical outcomes such as all-cause mortality and HF rehospitalization were also associated with lower levels of BDNF in individual studies.
CONCLUSIONS: BDNF levels are decreased in patients with HF. Most importantly, we observed an association between lower BDNF levels and poor prognosis in patients with HF. Our study supports BDNF as an easy-to-dose diagnostic and prognostic
biomarker to be implemented in clinical practice for HF. Further studies are warranted to address this ability specifically.