Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an extremely common clinical problem with an important population morbidity and mortality burden. The management of AF is complex and fraught with many uncertain and contentious issues, which are being addressed by extensive ongoing basic and clinical research. The Canadian Cardiovascular Society AF Guidelines Committee produced an extensive set of evidence-based AF management guidelines in 2010 and updated them in the areas of anticoagulation and rate/rhythm control in 2012. In late 2013, the committee judged that sufficient new information regarding AF management had become available since 2012 to warrant an update to the Canadian Cardiovascular Society AF Guidelines. After extensive evaluation of the new evidence, the committee has updated the guidelines for: (1) stroke prevention principles; (2) anticoagulation of AF patients with chronic kidney disease; (3) detection of AF in patients with stroke; (4) investigation and management of subclinical AF; (5) left atrial appendage closure in stroke prevention; (6) emergency department management of AF; (7) periprocedural anticoagulation management; and (8) rate and rhythm control including catheter ablation. This report presents the details of the updated recommendations, along with their background and rationale. In addition, a complete set of presently applicable recommendations, those that have been updated and those that remain in force from previous guideline versions, is provided in the Supplementary Material.

The prevalence and incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) are increasing rapidly. Key recommendations in management of AF include prompt administration of oral anticoagulation to all patients with elevated risk of thromboembolic complications, proper use of antiarrhythmic drugs and invasive therapies in highly symptomatic patients and adequate rate control in patients with permanent AF. The selection between warfarin and the novel oral anticoagulants (apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban) is based on careful evaluation of the benefits and disadvantages of the drugs in a given patient.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacological prophylactic anticoagulation in many countries, including South Africa, is under-prescribed. This has resulted in unacceptable rates of morbidity and mortality.
METHODS: The Southern African Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis held a meeting to update the previous guideline and review new literature including guidelines from other societies. The following specialties were represented on the committees: anaesthetics, cardiology, clinical haematology, critical care, obstetrics and gynaecology, haematopathology, internal medicine, neurology, orthopaedic surgery and pulmonology. A draft document was presented at the meeting, which was then revised by consensus agreement. To avoid local bias, the guideline was adjudicated by recognised international external experts.
CONCLUSIONS: A concise, practical updated guideline for thromboprophylaxis and treatment in medical and surgical patients has been produced for South African conditions. It is hoped that this guideline will continue to improve anticoagulation practice in this country, which we believe will directly benefit patient outcomes.

Patient presented with passage of fresh blood mixed with clots per rectum. In the ER, she was found to have bright red blood per rectum with clots, with frank blood on nasogastric tube. She was on dabigatran for atrial fibrillation and aspirin, with intermittent intake of ibuprofen. Vitals were positive for orthostatic hypotension. The pertinent findings in the physical examination were altered mental status with orientation*1, weak peripheral pulses, irregularly irregular heart rate, and bilateral pitting edema 2+ in bilateral lower extremities. Patient was intubated and put on mechanical ventilation. A massive transfusion protocol was followed. Laboratories and imaging: hemoglobin/hematocrit, 7.2/22.1; white blood cells, 7.7, platelet, 210; international normalized ratio, 2.5; prothrombin time, 19.2; activated partial thromboplastin time, 88.2; CMP was WNL; BNP, 621; fibrinogen, 500 mg/dL. Electrocardiogram showed atrial fibrillation with inferolateral ischemia. Ultrasonography of the liver and gallbladder showed no acute pathology. Echocardiogram showed an EF of 70% with hyperdynamic LV. Patient was transferred to the intensive care unit. Dabigatran, aspirin, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were discontinued, and antihypertensives were held. She was given blood and FFPs. Hemoglobin, hematocrit, and coagulation profile was monitored every 6 hours. Gastroenterology, general surgery, interventional radiology, and hematology services were called stat. IR placed a double-lumen, power central venous catheter. In gastroenterology, EGD and colonoscopy was performed, which showed active bleed at distal esophagus, stopped with local epinephrine. No active bleed seen on colonoscopy. The patient was put on Nexium drip. Hematology service recommended thrombin time (>200) and factors 2, 5, 7, 9, 10-41(l), 80, 68, 48(l), 61. Prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time mixing studies were done, which indicated the presence of thrombin inhibition. Prothrombin complex concentrate at 50 U/kg was started to reverse the effect of dabigatran, and platelets were transfused to reverse the effect of aspirin. They also discussed that the half-life of dabigatran being 17 hours, and the drug would not be toxic at this point, as the patient was already 24-hour inpatient by now. The hemoglobin trend: 7.4→6.4→8.2→7.5→6.6. At this point, the need for further intervention in form of hemodialysis or plasmapheresis was considered. The patient was given plasmapheresis and hemoglobin and hematocrit stabilized. The patient was kept on continued mechanical ventilator support for the night and extubated next day. The hemodynamics stabilized and the patient was transferred to the general medical floors after 1 day of observation, after extubation.

暂无摘要。

A number of novel oral anticoagulants that directly target factor Xa or thrombin have been developed in recent years. Rivaroxaban and apixaban (direct factor Xa inhibitors) and dabigatran etexilate (a direct thrombin inhibitor) have shown considerable promise in large-scale, randomised clinical studies for the management of thromboembolic disorders, and have been approved for clinical use in specific indications. Rivaroxaban is licensed for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing elective hip or knee replacement surgery, the treatment of deep-vein thrombosis and prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism, and for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Based on the clinical trial data for rivaroxaban, feedback on its use in clinical practice and the authors\' experience with the use of rivaroxaban, practical guidance for the use of rivaroxaban in special patient populations and specific clinical situations is provided. Although most recommendations are in line with the European summary of product characteristics for the approved indications, additional and, in several areas, different recommendations are given based on review of the literature and the authors\' clinical experience.

暂无摘要。

According to the update of the Finnish guidelines for management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) dronedarone should be used only in patients with non-permanent AF as a second line medication. It is recommended to monitor the patients regularly and stop dronedarone if permanent AF, heart failure or other adverse events are detected. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban can be used as an alternative to warfarin in patients requiring oral anticoagulation therapy. The selection between warfarin and the new anticoagulants should be based on careful evaluation of the benefits and disadvantages of the drugs in a given patient.

BACKGROUND: The risk of stroke varies considerably across different groups of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Antithrombotic prophylaxis for stroke is associated with an increased risk of bleeding. We provide recommendations for antithrombotic treatment based on net clinical benefit for patients with AF at varying levels of stroke risk and in a number of common clinical scenarios.
METHODS: We used the methods described in the Methodology for the Development of Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis Guidelines: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines article of this supplement.
RESULTS: For patients with nonrheumatic AF, including those with paroxysmal AF, who are (1) at low risk of stroke (eg, CHADS(2) [congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥ 75 years, diabetes mellitus, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack] score of 0), we suggest no therapy rather than antithrombotic therapy, and for patients choosing antithrombotic therapy, we suggest aspirin rather than oral anticoagulation or combination therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel; (2) at intermediate risk of stroke (eg, CHADS(2) score of 1), we recommend oral anticoagulation rather than no therapy, and we suggest oral anticoagulation rather than aspirin or combination therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel; and (3) at high risk of stroke (eg, CHADS(2) score of ≥ 2), we recommend oral anticoagulation rather than no therapy, aspirin, or combination therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel. Where we recommend or suggest in favor of oral anticoagulation, we suggest dabigatran 150 mg bid rather than adjusted-dose vitamin K antagonist therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Oral anticoagulation is the optimal choice of antithrombotic therapy for patients with AF at high risk of stroke (CHADS(2) score of ≥ 2). At lower levels of stroke risk, antithrombotic treatment decisions will require a more individualized approach.

Dabigatran and other new oral anticoagulants (OAC) represent a step forward in stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). They indeed have been shown to be an alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) without the burden of laboratory control. However, these new drugs compete with an effective and well-established therapy, thus bringing about a series of questions and doubts. In this report members of the board of the Italian Federation of Thrombosis Centers (FCSA) answer some questions every clinician might be confronted with.