This study investigates the correlation between COVID-19 and avascular necrosis of the femoral head, considering the potential contribution of medication-induced effects. This research spans the period from August 2022 to January 2024 and includes 32 patients diagnosed with avascular necrosis. While steroid usage, particularly in high doses, is known to predispose individuals to this condition, this study aims to discern if COVID-19 itself plays a role beyond the influence of medication. Notably, COVID-19 is associated with disturbances in the coagulation system, potentially leading to thromboembolic complications. Of the patients, six did not have COVID-19, while seven had the virus but did not receive steroid treatment. However, 19 patients with COVID-19 exhibited severe pulmonary involvement and were administered both high-dose steroids and antiviral medication. Among the observed patients, 14 were female and 18 were male. Notably, three patients presented bilateral necrosis, all of whom had COVID-19 and significant pulmonary involvement. Diagnostic assessments included frontal and profile X-rays, as well as MRI scans for all patients.

Osteonecrosis is a debilitating condition characterized by the loss of blood supply to the bones, leading to bone death. This condition can impact various bones, including the jaw, which significantly affects patients\' quality of life by causing difficulties in swallowing, feeding, chewing, and speaking, along with swollen, painful mucous membranes and chronic sinusitis. Osteonecrosis can arise due to treatment with antiresorptive drugs. However, there is a growing number of reports of osteonecrosis following novel targeted anti-cancer treatments, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and biological therapies. The pathogenesis of osteonecrosis is linked to the side effects of the antiangiogenic mechanisms of these medications, leading to a disrupted blood flow. Our review aims to examine recent insights into osteonecrosis triggered by new anti-cancer drugs. Most reports focus on the osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ); however, we discovered that some authors have described cases of osteonecrosis affecting the femoral head or elbow following novel anti-cancer treatments. Prevention is a key component in managing osteonecrosis. Therefore, a comprehensive risk assessment should always be performed before and during anti-cancer therapy.

The purpose of this study was to collect and present all the available evidence regarding avascular maxillary necrosis following maxillary osteotomy for orthognathic surgery.
We performed a systematic review of MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus and Cochrane Library dataset in accordance with the PRISMA guideline. We included studies that report on avascular maxillary necrosis after any maxillary osteotomy used in the frame of orthognathic surgery.
Sixteen studies reporting a total of 65 patients with postoperative avascular maxillary necrosis were included. Those reported avascular necrosis in 32 female patients and 19 male patients. Multisegmented Le Fort I osteotomy was the most common type of related operation amongst the patients followed by single segment Le Fort I osteotomy.
Although avascular maxillary necrosis is a very rare complication after maxillary orthognathic surgery it can be complicated with partial / complete loss of the maxilla. A personalized selection of the surgical technique should be made for any patient. Caution is warranted in cleft patients and in patients undergoing multisegmented Le Fort I osteotomies, so that the vitality of the maxilla and especially its anterior part is preserved. In the case when avascular necrosis arises, management should be immediate and precise. As for the reconstruction, it needs to be tailored according to the maxillary defect.

UNASSIGNED: Femoral neck fractures in children are uncommon, making up little more than 1% of all paediatric fractures. It\'s not apparent which type of internal fixation-closed or open-is preferable in these situations when it comes to therapeutic options. When treating children with displaced femoral neck fractures, serious problems can arise.
UNASSIGNED: Five databases were examined: Medline Plus, PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, and Web of Science. The outcomes that were relevant for the meta-analysis were non-union, coxa vara, and avascular necrosis. Using the RevMan file, we extracted the data and carried out the analysis (Review Manager Version 5.3).
UNASSIGNED: 294 patients had ORIF procedures and 266 patients had CRIF procedures in the included trials. Regarding the outcome of avascular necrosis, we discovered that there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (RR = 0.84, [95% confidence range (CI) = 0.60, 1.18], P = 0.32). There was homogeneity in the data (P = 0.22, I2 = 27%). When it came to coxa vara, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (RR = 0.69, [95% CI = 0.30, 1.58], P = 0.38). There was homogeneity in the data (P = 0.22, I2 = 27%). Regarding non-union, the similar outcome was seen (RR = 0.45, [95% CI = 0.16, 1.14], P = 0.12). There was homogeneity in the data (P = 0.49, I2 = 0%).
UNASSIGNED: Regarding reducing the risk of non-union, coxa vara, and avascular necrosis, we did not find any difference between CRIF and ORIF. To validate this outcome, however, additional research on the various variables (fracture type, age, displacement, fixation technique, and duration of surgery) is required. Sorting patients based on the kind of fracture will ensure that the right approach is used for each type.

Dieterich\'s disease or avascular osteonecrosis of the metacarpal head is rare and not often described in the literature. It affects typically the middle of metacarpal bones and can occur at all age groups. A case of a teenager with chronic pain of the third and fourth metacarpal head is presented.

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic substitution of the talus presents a significant challenge to the foot and ankle surgeon. The shear and compressive forces on the talus and its tenuous blood supply lead to high rates of avascular necrosis and eventual talar collapse. The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate whether total ankle total talus replacement (TATTR) leads to improved clinical and radiographic outcomes with appropriate safety metrics in patients with a history of avascular necrosis or significant trauma.
METHODS: We searched the concepts of talus, prosthesis, and arthroplasty in MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (Elsevier), CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost), and Scopus (Elsevier) from the database\'s inception through March 9, 2023. Inclusion Criteria were 1) previous trauma to the talus, 2) post-traumatic arthritis to the tibiotalar joint, 3) avascular necrosis of talus, 4) multiple failed prior interventions, 5) degenerative osteoarthritis to the tibiotalar joint, and 6) inflammatory arthropathy to tibiotalar joint. Patients less than 18 years of age and manuscripts in non-English languages were excluded.
RESULTS: Of the 7625 references, 16 studies met the inclusion criteria, yielding data from 136 patients (139 ankles). The studies varied in design, with case reports and retrospective case series being predominant. The overall weighted average modified Coleman Methodology Score (mCMS) was 70.4 out of 100, indicating moderate flaws in study design that may be subject to various forms of bias and possible confounders. Demographics showed a diverse range of etiologies, with alumina ceramic being the primary prosthesis material. Functional scores demonstrated improvements in dorsiflexion and plantarflexion, although patient-reported outcome measures (PROs) were inconsistently reported. Complications included fractures, heterotopic ossification, prolonged wound healing, and infections. Revision details were sparsely reported.
CONCLUSIONS: TATTR is a promising treatment modality for improving short-term functional outcomes for patients with avascular necrosis or trauma-related issues. However, this systematic review underscores the need for standardized reporting, longer-term follow-ups, and further research to establish the procedure\'s efficacy and safety, particularly in comparison to other treatment modalities.
METHODS: III, Systematic Review of Level IV Studies.

Avascular necrosis (AVN), characterised by compromised blood supply leading to bone necrosis, poses a significant challenge in orthopaedic and rheumatologic practice. This review comprehensively examines early AVN treatment strategies, including aetiology and risk factors, clinical presentation, conservative and surgical approaches, emerging therapies, and rehabilitation. Key findings underscore the importance of early detection, personalised treatment plans, and a multidisciplinary approach involving orthopaedic specialists, rheumatologists, and physical therapists. The implications for clinical practice emphasise individualised care, staying abreast of emerging therapies, and patient education. Recommendations for future management strategies highlight the need for imaging technology advancements, regenerative therapies integration, and ongoing research into genetic and molecular pathways. As the field continues to evolve, translating research findings into clinical practice holds promise for improving outcomes and enhancing the overall quality of life for individuals affected by AVN.

Musculoskeletal disorders, standing as the fifth leading cause of disability-adjusted life years globally, present significant challenges in orthopedics. Osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) and avascular necrosis (AVN) are distinct but closely related conditions within this spectrum, impacting patients\' quality of life with pain, limited mobility, and dysfunction. OCD, involving cartilage and bone detachment in joints, predominantly affects young athletes, but its exact etiology and optimal management remain subjects of ongoing research. Conversely, AVN, marked by bone tissue death due to compromised blood supply, is linked to systemic factors like corticosteroid use and traumatic injuries. Diagnosis for both conditions relies on radiography and magnetic resonance imaging. Conservative treatment for AVN includes the use of a cane or crutches, pharmacological therapy, or physical therapy. On the other hand, in OCD, the primary approach is activity/sports restriction. Surgical treatment options for AVN patients encompass core decompression, bone grafting, or, in the most advanced cases, total hip arthroplasty. OCD may be surgically treated through subchondral drilling or fixation of unstable lesions. Advanced cases of OCD involve cartilage salvage with resurfacing techniques. The presentation of differences between these conditions enhances our understanding, facilitating improved diagnosis and management strategies.

This systematic review was designed to compare the outcomes of the two braces against each other classified by the Graf method. The databases sources included PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar. The keywords included \"DDH Tubingen versus Pavlik\" and Tubingen and Pavlik separately. Included papers provided specific data regarding success and failure rate, avascular necrosis (AVN), duration, and age of intervention. The excluded studies discussed surgeries, diagnosis and mechanism, and ones that weren\'t in English. Total of 20 papers were included, resulting in 1243 Tubingen and 420 Pavlik samples. It was seen that the Tubingen splint had a statistically significant greater success rate and lower failure rate for Graf 2, D, and 3 hips, while both braces were not very successful for Graf 4 at success rates less than 60 %. Tubingen also had a lower incidence of AVN. Both braces shared similar ages of intervention, duration, and time per day. Both braces are very comparable to each other, each having better success rates for lower Graf grades, which points to the importance of bracing earlier to improve the success rates. The Tubingen splint had a higher success rate, lower failure rate, and lower AVN rate compared to the Pavlik harness. This points to the Tubingen splint potentially being the preferred option for bracing in infants.

UNASSIGNED: To investigate the effectiveness of different dosages of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) on pain, function and radiographic outcomes in patients with osteonecrosis of femoral head (ONFH).
UNASSIGNED: The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analysis) guidelines were followed to conduct this review. The systematic literature search was done by using six different electronic databases include MEDLINE (assessed by Pubmed) CENTRAL (Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials), Web of Science, PEDro (Physiotherapy Evidence Database), Scopus and Science Direct. Retrospective and prospective cohort studies; case control study, randomized clinical trials were included. Screening conducted by two independent authors along with inclusion and exclusion criteria of included studies. The methodological quality assessment for cohort studies and randomized clinical trials was done by using Structured Effectiveness Quality Evaluation Scale (SEQES) and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for case control study.
UNASSIGNED: Total 1410 articles were found from various databases. After duplicates removed 450 articles remained. Followed by title and abstract screening 53 articles eligible for full text reading, out of them 13 articles met the inclusion criteria and included in this review.
UNASSIGNED: High energy flux densities of ESWT found to be more effective followed by low and moderate energy flux densities in earlier course of the disease compared to later stages in terms of pain relief, functional improvement and disease progression. Due to high variability among study design, ESWT dosages, patient characteristics and considering the paucity of well conducted studies, the present study cannot be conclusive.