atypical presentation

非典型演示
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    带状疱疹(HZ)通常在有水痘感染史的成人和老年患者中潜伏水痘-带状疱疹病毒(VZV)重新激活后出现。符合疫苗接种计划且没有任何免疫受损状况的患者的原发性VZV感染很少见,重新激活导致HZ更加罕见。该病例报告详述了一个这样的例子,涉及一名13岁的有免疫能力且完全免疫的男性,尽管没有VZV感染史,以及这种不常见的演示的可能的解释机制。此病例报告有助于越来越多的有关儿科人群中非典型HZ表现的文献,而没有任何VZV感染或暴露史。
    Herpes zoster (HZ) typically presents following reactivation of latent varicella-zoster virus (VZV) in adult and geriatric patients with a history of prior varicella infection. Primary VZV infection in patients compliant with vaccine schedules and without any immunocompromising condition is rare, with reactivation leading to HZ being even rarer. This case report details one such example involving a 13-year-old immunocompetent and fully immunized male with HZ despite no history of VZV infection, as well as possible explanatory mechanisms for this uncommon presentation. This case report contributes to a growing body of literature on atypical HZ presentations in pediatric populations without any history of prior VZV infection or exposure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    诊断错误的持久性,尽管在医学知识和诊断方面取得了进步,强调了解非典型疾病表现及其对死亡率和发病率的贡献的重要性.人工智能(AI)特别是像GPT-4这样的生成式预训练变压器,有望提高诊断准确性,但在处理非典型演示文稿方面需要进一步探索。
    本研究旨在评估ChatGPT在对常见疾病的非典型表现进行鉴别诊断时的诊断准确性,重点关注模型在诊断过程中对患者病史的依赖。
    我们使用了《通才医学杂志》上的25个临床小插曲,描述了常见疾病的非典型表现。两名全科医生根据非典型性对病例进行了分类。然后根据所提供的临床信息使用ChatGPT进行鉴别诊断。测量了人工智能生成和最终诊断之间的一致性,重点关注排名靠前的疾病(前1名)和前5名的鉴别诊断(前5名)。
    ChatGPT的诊断准确性随着非典型表现的增加而降低。对于第1类(C1)案例,前1名的一致率为17%(n=1),前5名的一致率为67%(n=4)。类别3(C3)和类别4(C4)显示前1名的一致性为0%,前5名的比率明显较低,这表明处理高度非典型病例存在困难。χ2检验显示,不典型组(C1C2)和不典型组(C3C4)之间的前1个鉴别诊断准确性没有显着差异(χ²1=2.07;n=25;P=.13)。然而,在前5项分析中发现了显著差异,非典型病例较少,准确性较高(χ²1=4.01;n=25;P=0.048)。
    ChatGPT-4显示出作为诊断常见疾病的典型和轻度非典型表现的辅助工具的潜力。然而,其业绩下降的非典型性更大。研究结果强调,人工智能系统需要包含更广泛的语言能力。文化理解,和不同的临床场景,以提高在现实世界中的诊断效用。
    UNASSIGNED: The persistence of diagnostic errors, despite advances in medical knowledge and diagnostics, highlights the importance of understanding atypical disease presentations and their contribution to mortality and morbidity. Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly generative pre-trained transformers like GPT-4, holds promise for improving diagnostic accuracy, but requires further exploration in handling atypical presentations.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of ChatGPT in generating differential diagnoses for atypical presentations of common diseases, with a focus on the model\'s reliance on patient history during the diagnostic process.
    UNASSIGNED: We used 25 clinical vignettes from the Journal of Generalist Medicine characterizing atypical manifestations of common diseases. Two general medicine physicians categorized the cases based on atypicality. ChatGPT was then used to generate differential diagnoses based on the clinical information provided. The concordance between AI-generated and final diagnoses was measured, with a focus on the top-ranked disease (top 1) and the top 5 differential diagnoses (top 5).
    UNASSIGNED: ChatGPT\'s diagnostic accuracy decreased with an increase in atypical presentation. For category 1 (C1) cases, the concordance rates were 17% (n=1) for the top 1 and 67% (n=4) for the top 5. Categories 3 (C3) and 4 (C4) showed a 0% concordance for top 1 and markedly lower rates for the top 5, indicating difficulties in handling highly atypical cases. The χ2 test revealed no significant difference in the top 1 differential diagnosis accuracy between less atypical (C1+C2) and more atypical (C3+C4) groups (χ²1=2.07; n=25; P=.13). However, a significant difference was found in the top 5 analyses, with less atypical cases showing higher accuracy (χ²1=4.01; n=25; P=.048).
    UNASSIGNED: ChatGPT-4 demonstrates potential as an auxiliary tool for diagnosing typical and mildly atypical presentations of common diseases. However, its performance declines with greater atypicality. The study findings underscore the need for AI systems to encompass a broader range of linguistic capabilities, cultural understanding, and diverse clinical scenarios to improve diagnostic utility in real-world settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:糖尿病患者的自主神经系统功能障碍可导致心血管疾病的不典型表现,可被遗漏。我们旨在使用单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)评估患有非典型疼痛的糖尿病患者的心血管疾病(CAD),以确定上述疼痛是否反映了CAD。
    方法:患有非典型心脏症状的糖尿病患者被转诊到SPECT科。人口统计数据,如年龄,性别,糖尿病状态,和其他潜在的疾病被收集。然后进行心肌灌注扫描。记录结果,以无创方式评估心肌缺血的风险和冠状动脉受累程度。
    结果:该研究包括222名(177名女性)受试者,在阳性和阴性SPECT中平均年龄为63.01±11.62和59.41±9.19,分别。最常见的症状为不典型胸痛(51.8%),其次是呼吸急促(50.5%),恶心,和晕厥(0.9%)。心脏参数,例如求和压力分数(SSS),总休息分数(SRS),应力总灌注不足(TPD-s),静息总灌注不足(TPD-r),在冠状动脉受累组中明显高于对照组(P<0.001)。然而,射血分数(EF),舒张末期容积(EDV),和收缩末期容积(ESV)参数没有(分别为P=0.328、0.351和0.443)。
    结论:糖尿病的存在不需要任何额外的诊断测试,除了普通人群所需的诊断测试之外,并且可以遵循类似于普通人群的诊断过程。
    BACKGROUND: Autonomic nervous system dysfunction in diabetic patients can result in an atypical presentation of cardiovascular disease that can be missed. We aimed to use single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) to assess cardiovascular disease (CAD) in diabetic patients with atypical pain to determine whether the pain above reflects the CAD.
    METHODS: Diabetic patients with atypical cardiac symptoms were referred to the SPECT department. Demographic data such as age, gender, diabetes status, and other underlying diseases were gathered. A myocardial perfusion scan was then performed. The results were recorded to evaluate the risk of myocardial ischemia and the degree of coronary artery involvement in a non-invasive manner.
    RESULTS: The study included 222 (177 female) subjects with mean ages of 63.01±11.62 and 59.41±9.19 in positive and negative SPECT, respectively. The most common symptoms were atypical chest pain (51.8%), followed by shortness of breath (50.5%), nausea, and syncope (0.9%). Cardiac parameters, such as the summed stress score (SSS), summed rest score (SRS), total perfusion deficit in stress (TPD-s), total perfusion deficit in rest (TPD-r), were significantly higher in the group with coronary artery involvement (P<0.001). However, ejection fraction (EF), end-diastolic volume (EDV), and end-systolic volumes (ESV) parameters were not (P=.0.328, 0.351, and 0.443, respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: The mere presence of diabetes does not necessitate any additional diagnostic tests beyond those required for the general population, and it is possible to follow a diagnostic course similar to that of the general population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    中毒性巨结肠表示结肠突然非阻塞性扩张,伴有全身毒性症状。死亡率可高达7.9%。虽然主要与慢性肠道疾病有关,由于滥用广谱抗生素,艰难梭菌的发病率激增.在大多数情况下,手术干预是必要的。在这里,我们说明了一个50岁的女性出现持续9小时的发作性胃痛的情况,呕吐,和水汪汪的排便,没有腹膜刺激的发现,也没有慢性肠道炎症的病史。在某些情况下,有毒巨结肠可能非典型地表现出来,强调进行全面病史和临床评估的重要性。此外,必须征求相关的临床旁检查,以从整体上解决患者问题并促进良好的临床结局。
    Toxic megacolon denotes an abrupt non-obstructive distension of the colon, accompanied by systemic signs of toxicity. Mortality rates can soar as high as 7.9%. While primarily linked with chronic bowel conditions, the incidence attributed to Clostridioides difficile has surged due to the indiscriminate use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Surgical intervention becomes necessary in the majority of cases. Herein, we illustrate the case of a 50-year-old female presenting with episodic epigastric pain lasting 9 h, vomiting, and watery bowel movements, devoid of peritoneal irritation findings and lacking a history of chronic intestinal inflammation. Under certain circumstances, toxic megacolon may manifest atypically, underscoring the importance of conducting a comprehensive medical history and clinical assessment. Moreover, it is imperative to solicit pertinent paraclinical investigations to address the patient holistically and foster a favorable clinical outcome.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    乳腺癌被认为是全世界最常见的癌症之一。乳腺癌最常见的转移部位是淋巴结,骨头,肺,大脑,还有肝脏.胃肠道的参与并不常见,和阑尾转移是罕见的。我们报告了一例43岁女性,既往无恶性肿瘤史,出现急性阑尾炎并接受腹腔镜阑尾切除术,最终的组织病理学评估显示转移性乳腺癌。
    Breast cancer is considered one of the most common cancers worldwide. The most common sites for breast cancer to metastasize are the lymph nodes, bones, lungs, brain, and liver. Involvement of the gastrointestinal tract is uncommon, and metastasis to the appendix is rare. We report a case involving a 43-year-old woman with no previous history of malignancy who presented with acute appendicitis and underwent laparoscopic appendectomy, with the final histopathological assessment revealing metastatic breast cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:钩端螺旋体病具有高度可变的临床表现,影响不同个体的不同器官系统。表现范围从无症状或轻度疾病到与多器官衰竭和更高死亡率相关的严重疾病。由于缺乏诊断方式和临床医生的怀疑较少,钩端螺旋体病被高度低估。
    方法:我们提出了12例单中心回顾性病例系列,其中包括各种常见和不常见的情况,这种疾病可以出现,并且由于缺乏怀疑而可能被错过。该研究包含个体患者特征,包括人口统计学,实验室,临床,和治疗数据。使用p值分析这些变量与死亡率之间的关联,并描述结果。P值<0.05被认为是统计学上显著的。
    结果:共12例纳入研究。男女比例为3:1。死亡病例的平均年龄(37.75±9.81岁)高于康复病例(34.25±14.09)。比如酗酒史,慢性肝病(CLD)的存在,黄疸,急性肾功能衰竭,透析的要求,重症监护和重症监护要求与死亡风险增加显著相关(比值比>1,p值<0.05).最常见的症状是发热11例(91.66%)。黄疸和肾衰竭与死亡显著相关(比值比1.2,p值0.04)。重症监护治疗的需求(比值比2.1,p值0.05)和透析(比值比39.66,p值0.03)也与死亡显着相关。接受联合抗生素治疗的患者组的死亡百分比较低。
    结论:钩端螺旋体病在不同个体中有不同的表现,由于缺乏特定的体征和症状,可能会漏诊。涉及多个器官的严重疾病和先前存在的合并症与较高的死亡率相关。及时诊断和治疗对于降低死亡率和增加生存率是必要的。
    BACKGROUND: Leptospirosis presents with highly variable clinical manifestations affecting different organ systems in different individuals. The presentation ranges from an asymptomatic or mild disease to a severe disease associated with multiorgan failure and higher mortality. Leptospirosis is highly underreported due to a lack of diagnostic modalities and less suspicion among clinicians.
    METHODS: We present this single-center retrospective case series of 12 cases, which include various common and uncommon scenarios by which the disease can present and can be missed due to lack of suspicion. The study contains individual patient characteristics including demographic, laboratory, clinical, and treatment data. The association between these variables and mortality was analyzed using p-values and results were described. A p-value of<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
    RESULTS: A total of 12 cases were included in the study. The male-to-female ratio was 3:1. The mean age was higher (37.75±9.81 years) in cases who died than those who recovered (34.25±14.09). Factors like history of alcoholism, presence of chronic liver disease (CLD), jaundice, acute renal failure, requirement of dialysis, and requirement of intensive care were significantly associated with increased risk of death (odds ratio >1, p-value <0.05). The most common symptom of presentation was fever in 11 (91.66%) cases. Jaundice and renal failure were significantly associated with death (odds ratio 1.2, p-value 0.04). The requirement of intensive care treatment (odds ratio 2.1, p-value 0.05) and dialysis (odds ratio 39.66, p-value 0.03) were also significantly associated with death. The percentage of death was lower in the group of patients who received combination antibiotic therapy.
    CONCLUSIONS: Leptospirosis has varied presentations in different individuals and the diagnosis can be missed due to lack of specific signs and symptoms. Severe diseases involving multiple organs and preexisting comorbidities are associated with higher mortality rates. Timely diagnosis and treatment are necessary to reduce mortality and increase survival.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:非典型表现越来越被认为是导致内科诊断错误的重要因素。然而,由于缺乏被认为是非典型表现的广泛适用的定义和标准,因此尚未评估解决非典型表现与诊断错误之间关联的研究。
    目的:本研究的目的是描述如何在内科诊断错误的研究中定义和测量非典型表现,并利用这些新信息开发新的标准来识别高风险的非典型表现。
    方法:本研究将遵循已建立的范围审查框架。纳入标准是根据参与者制定的,概念,和上下文框架。这篇综述将考虑满足以下所有标准的研究:包括成年患者(参与者);使用任何定义探索非典型表现和诊断错误之间的关联,标准,或测量以识别非典型的表现和诊断错误(概念);并专注于内科(上下文)。关于来源的类型,这项范围审查将考虑定量,定性,和混合方法研究设计;系统评价;和意见文件纳入。病例报告,案例系列,会议摘要将被排除在外。数据将通过MEDLINE提取,WebofScience,CINAHL,Embase,科克伦图书馆,和谷歌学者搜索。语言没有限制,并将包括从数据库开始到2023年12月31日索引的论文。两名独立审稿人(YH和RK)将进行研究选择和数据提取。提取的数据将包括有关患者特征的具体细节(例如,年龄,性别,和疾病),非典型表现和诊断错误的定义和测量方法,临床设置(例如,科室和门诊或住院),证据来源类型,以及与复习问题相关的非典型演示和诊断错误之间的关联。提取的数据将以表格形式呈现,并带有描述性统计,使我们能够识别非典型表现的关键组成部分或类型,并开发新的标准来识别非典型表现,以便将来进行诊断错误的研究。制定新标准将遵循采用归纳法进行基本定性内容分析的指导。
    结果:截至2024年1月,正在通过多个数据库进行文献检索。我们将在2024年12月完成这项研究。
    结论:本范围审查旨在提供严格的证据,以开发新的标准,以识别内科诊断错误高风险的非典型表现。这样的标准可以促进全面概念模型的开发,以了解非典型表现与内科诊断错误之间的关联。
    背景:开放科学框架;www.osf.io/27d5m。
    DERR1-10.2196/56933。
    BACKGROUND: Atypical presentations have been increasingly recognized as a significant contributing factor to diagnostic errors in internal medicine. However, research to address associations between atypical presentations and diagnostic errors has not been evaluated due to the lack of widely applicable definitions and criteria for what is considered an atypical presentation.
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to describe how atypical presentations are defined and measured in studies of diagnostic errors in internal medicine and use this new information to develop new criteria to identify atypical presentations at high risk for diagnostic errors.
    METHODS: This study will follow an established framework for conducting scoping reviews. Inclusion criteria are developed according to the participants, concept, and context framework. This review will consider studies that fulfill all of the following criteria: include adult patients (participants); explore the association between atypical presentations and diagnostic errors using any definition, criteria, or measurement to identify atypical presentations and diagnostic errors (concept); and focus on internal medicine (context). Regarding the type of sources, this scoping review will consider quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods study designs; systematic reviews; and opinion papers for inclusion. Case reports, case series, and conference abstracts will be excluded. The data will be extracted through MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar searches. No limits will be applied to language, and papers indexed from database inception to December 31, 2023, will be included. Two independent reviewers (YH and RK) will conduct study selection and data extraction. The data extracted will include specific details about the patient characteristics (eg, age, sex, and disease), the definitions and measuring methods for atypical presentations and diagnostic errors, clinical settings (eg, department and outpatient or inpatient), type of evidence source, and the association between atypical presentations and diagnostic errors relevant to the review question. The extracted data will be presented in tabular format with descriptive statistics, allowing us to identify the key components or types of atypical presentations and develop new criteria to identify atypical presentations for future studies of diagnostic errors. Developing the new criteria will follow guidance for a basic qualitative content analysis with an inductive approach.
    RESULTS: As of January 2024, a literature search through multiple databases is ongoing. We will complete this study by December 2024.
    CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review aims to provide rigorous evidence to develop new criteria to identify atypical presentations at high risk for diagnostic errors in internal medicine. Such criteria could facilitate the development of a comprehensive conceptual model to understand the associations between atypical presentations and diagnostic errors in internal medicine.
    BACKGROUND: Open Science Framework; www.osf.io/27d5m.
    UNASSIGNED: DERR1-10.2196/56933.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:中央离心瘢痕性脱发(CCCA)命名法描述了瘢痕性脱发的典型临床表现,始于顶点头皮,对称,和离心演化。然而,作者在临床上注意到了非典型表现,并在文献中进行了报道.
    目的:我们试图描述已发表的CCCA成年患者脱发的分布特征。
    方法:使用三步搜索过程来评估CINAHL中的研究文章,EMBASE,谷歌学者,MEDLINE,Scopus,和WebofScience数据库。包括头皮摄影或脱发分布描述的研究。三名研究人员评估了符合条件的临床亚型研究。PRISMA扩展范围审查(PRISMA-ScR)用于报告结果。
    结果:纳入了由281例CCCA组成的99项研究。脱发分布包括经典演示文稿的变体以及不同的亚型,如斑驳,枕骨,顶叶,额叶,temporal,和trichorrhexis。
    结论:研究具有显著的同质性,正如CCCA的经典分布被普遍报道。此外,临床诊断病例可能有并发诊断,和许多研究没有报告的结果。
    结论:CCCA术语可能并不总是反映临床表现。了解非典型表现对于告知适当和有针对性的治疗至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: Central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia (CCCA) nomenclature describes a typical clinical presentation of cicatricial hair loss that begins on the vertex scalp with progressive, symmetric, and centrifugal evolution. However, atypical presentations have been noted clinically by the authors and reported in the literature.
    OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize the distribution of hair loss in published cases of adult patients with CCCA.
    METHODS: A 3-step search process was used to evaluate research articles in Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health, EMBASE, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Studies with scalp photography or description of hair loss distribution were included. Three researchers evaluated eligible studies for clinical subtypes. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Review was used to report results.
    RESULTS: Ninety-nine studies consisting of 281 cases of CCCA were included. Hair loss distributions included variants of the classic presentation along with distinct subtypes such as patchy, occipital, parietal, frontal, temporal, and trichorrhexis.
    CONCLUSIONS: Studies had significant homogeneity, as the classic distribution of CCCA was commonly reported. Additionally, clinically diagnosed cases may have concurrent diagnoses, and numerous studies did not report trichoscopy findings.
    CONCLUSIONS: CCCA terminology may not always be reflective of clinical presentation. Understanding atypical presentations is essential to inform appropriate and targeted treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    伤寒,也被称为肠热,是一种多系统感染,主要由肠沙门氏菌血清型伤寒引起,较少见的是肠道沙门氏菌血清型副伤寒A,B,和C.经典的演讲包括发烧,萎靡不振,弥漫性腹痛,还有便秘.如果不及时治疗,伤寒可以进展为谵妄,obtundation,肠出血,肠穿孔,在发病后一个月内死亡。然而,临床过程可以偏离经典的阶梯发热模式,现在只发生在12%的案例中。1在本报告中,我们描述了一个非典型的表现为一个健康的年轻男性的感觉神经性听力损失。
    Typhoid fever, also known as enteric fever, is a multisystemic infection primarily caused by Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi, and less commonly by Salmonella enterica serotypes Paratyphi A, B, and C. The classic presentation includes fever, malaise, diffuse abdominal pain, and constipation. If left untreated, typhoid fever can progress to delirium, obtundation, intestinal haemorrhage, bowel perforation, and death within a month of onset. However, the clinical course can deviate from the classic stepladder fever pattern, which now occurs in as few as 12% of cases.1 In this report, we describe an atypical presentation as sensorineural hearing loss in an otherwise healthy young male.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是调查诊断为急性心肌梗死(AMI)的糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者在症状表现方面的差异。
    共有5,900例首次AMI患者纳入分析。所有年龄在25至84岁之间的患者均由奥格斯堡的基于人群的心肌梗死登记处记录,德国,2010年至2017年。在面对面访谈的范围内评估急性事件期间12种AMI典型症状的存在(是/否)。采用多变量调整logistic回归模型分析AMI患者症状表现与糖尿病的关系。
    糖尿病患者的典型疼痛症状明显减少,包括典型的胸痛.此外,其他症状如出汗,呕吐/恶心,非糖尿病患者的头晕/眩晕和对死亡的恐惧/an灭感发生的可能性更大。唯一的例外是呼吸急促的症状,这在糖尿病患者中更常见。在多变量调整回归模型中,然而,观察到的效果减弱。在55岁以下的患者中,糖尿病和各种症状之间的关联主要缺失.
    2型糖尿病不仅是AMI发展的危险因素,但也与AMI后的不良结局相关.不典型的临床表现还使诊断过程复杂化。因此,医生必须意识到糖尿病AMI患者报告的更常见的非典型症状。
    UNASSIGNED: The objective of this study was to investigate the differences in presenting symptoms between patients with and without diabetes being diagnosed with an acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 5,900 patients with a first-time AMI were included into the analysis. All patients aged between 25 and 84 years were recorded by the population-based Myocardial Infarction Registry in Augsburg, Germany, between 2010 and 2017. The presence (yes/no) of 12 AMI typical symptoms during the acute event was assessed within the scope of a face-to-face interview. Multivariable adjusted logistic regression models were calculated to analyze the associations between presenting symptoms and diabetes mellitus in AMI patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with diabetes had significantly less frequent typical pain symptoms, including typical chest pain. Also, other symptoms like sweating, vomiting/nausea, dizziness/vertigo and fear of death/feeling of annihilation occurred significantly more likely in non-diabetic patients. The only exception was the symptom of shortness of breath, which was found significantly more often in patients with diabetes. In multivariable-adjusted regression models, however, the observed effects were attenuated. In patients younger than 55 years, the associations between diabetes and various symptoms were mainly missing.
    UNASSIGNED: Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a risk factor not only for the development of AMI, but is also associated with an adverse outcome after AMI. Atypical clinical presentation additionally complicates the diagnostic process. It is therefore essential for physicians to be aware of the more often atypical symptoms that diabetic AMI patients report.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号