assistive technology

辅助技术
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    辅助技术(AT)有可能提高老年人的生活质量和独立生活,进一步,减轻正式和非正式照顾者和亲属的负担。过去几十年的技术发展导致了可用AT的增加。然而,关于在现实世界中应用ATs的好处和满意度的证据仍然很少。
    这个前景,真实世界,试点研究测试了在现实环境中对不同ATS的感知效益和满意度。
    居住在社区的65岁以上的成年人及其亲属在日常生活中对具有简化界面的平板电脑或具有可编程紧急联系人的智能手表进行了8周的测试。所有老年人及其亲属在干预前后使用不同的评估工具评估对ATs的感知益处和满意度。成果衡量标准包括技术使用情况清单,魁北克用户对辅助技术2.0和加拿大职业绩效评估的满意度。
    共有17名老年人(平板电脑:n=8,47%和智能手表:n=9,53%)和16名亲属(平板电脑:n=7,44%和智能手表:n=9,56%)被纳入研究。在智能手表组中,虚弱(根据临床虚弱量表)和接受护理的参与者人数高于平板电脑组。智能手表组的老年人报告的技术接受度(技术使用清单)和满意度(魁北克用户对辅助技术的满意度评估2.0)得分高于平板电脑组,虽然差异不显著(P>0.05)。在平板电脑组中,亲属对使用项目意向的评分明显高于老年人(t12.3=3.3,P=.006).与加拿大职业绩效措施有关的日常问题包括平板电脑的联系/沟通和娱乐/信息,在紧急情况下为智能手表提供安全和帮助,以及两种设备的AT的可用性。虽然这些领域的性能(t8=3.5,P=.008)和满意度(t8=3.2,P=.01)在智能手表组中得到了显着改善,平板电脑组的变化不一致(均P>.05).
    这项研究强调了在老年人及其亲属的日常生活中广泛有效地应用ATs的剩余障碍。虽然结果没有提供关于沟通缺陷的积极影响的证据,感知到的好处可以显示在安全领域。未来的研究和技术发展不仅需要考虑偏好,问题,以及老年人及其亲属和护理人员的目标,以提高AT的可接受性和有效性。
    UNASSIGNED: Assistive technologies (ATs) have the potential to promote the quality of life and independent living of older adults and, further, to relieve the burden of formal and informal caregivers and relatives. Technological developments over the last decades have led to a boost of available ATs. However, evidence on the benefits and satisfaction with ATs in real-world applications remains scarce.
    UNASSIGNED: This prospective, real-world, pilot study tested the perceived benefit and satisfaction with different ATs in the real-world environment.
    UNASSIGNED: Community-dwelling adults aged ≥65 and their relatives tested a tablet computer with a simplified interface or a smartwatch with programmable emergency contacts for 8 weeks in their everyday life. Perceived benefits and satisfaction with ATs were assessed by all older adults and their relatives using different assessment tools before and after the intervention. Outcome measures included the Technology Usage Inventory, Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0, and Canadian Occupational Performance Measure.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 17 older adults (tablet computer: n=8, 47% and smartwatch: n=9, 53%) and 16 relatives (tablet computer: n=7, 44% and smartwatch: n=9, 56%) were included in the study. The number of participants that were frail (according to the Clinical Frailty Scale) and received care was higher in the smartwatch group than in the tablet computer group. Older adults of the smartwatch group reported higher technology acceptance (Technology Usage Inventory) and satisfaction (Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0) scores than those of the tablet computer group, although the differences were not significant (all P>.05). In the tablet computer group, relatives had significantly higher ratings on the item intention to use than older adults (t12.3=3.3, P=.006). Identified everyday issues with the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure included contact/communication and entertainment/information for the tablet computer, safety and getting help in emergency situations for the smartwatch, and the usability of the AT for both devices. While the performance (t8=3.5, P=.008) and satisfaction (t8=3.2, P=.01) in these domains significantly improved in the smartwatch group, changes in the tablet computer group were inconsistent (all P>.05).
    UNASSIGNED: This study highlights the remaining obstacles for the widespread and effective application of ATs in the everyday life of older adults and their relatives. While the results do not provide evidence for a positive effect regarding communication deficits, perceived benefits could be shown for the area of safety. Future research and technical developments need to consider not only the preferences, problems, and goals of older adults but also their relatives and caregivers to improve the acceptability and effectiveness of ATs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    有智力障碍的人往往无法学习复杂的任务。改进的目标管理培训(mGMT)或无错误学习与辅助技术(App+EL)相结合可以提供帮助。目标是证明mGMT和/或App+EL在学习复杂任务中的有效性。我们采用随机对照交叉设计。一组以MGMT(N=16)开始,和其他与App+EL(N=15)。我们将它们的表现与被动对照组(N=15)进行了比较。培训包括六个课程,每个课程30分钟。使用目标达成量表(GAS)分析成功。在每个干预期之前和之后评估三个不同的任务:“练习”,“非练习”,或“以前练习过”。通过神经心理学测试评估泛化。结果表明,与“非实践”任务和对照组相比,两种干预措施均显着改善了“实践”任务。通过干预不会干扰“以前练习”任务的稳定表现。然而,从降低MGMT开始,但并没有消除,穿越后App+EL的功效,但是对于反向序列没有观察到这种模式。只有伦敦塔任务记录了与干预措施相关的改进。总之,MGMT和App+EL在学习复杂任务和学习第二个任务后保持表现方面有效。试验注册:德国临床试验注册标识符:DRKS00021674。
    Individuals with intellectual disabilities often fail to learn complex tasks. Modified Goal Management Training (mGMT) or Errorless Learning combined with assistive technology (App + EL) can help. The goal is to demonstrate the effectiveness of mGMT and/or App + EL in learning complex tasks. We employed a randomized controlled crossover design. One group started with mGMT (N = 16), and the other with App + EL (N = 15). We compared their performance with that of a passive control group (N = 15). The training consisted of six sessions of 30 minutes each. Success was analyzed using the Goal Attainment Scale (GAS). Three different tasks were assessed before and after each intervention period: \"Practiced\", \"Non-Practiced\", or \"Previously Practiced\". Generalization was evaluated through neuropsychological tests. Results indicated that both interventions significantly improved \"Practiced\" tasks compared with \"Non-Practiced\" tasks and the control group. Crossing the intervention did not interfere with the stable performance on the \"Previously Practiced\" task. However, starting with mGMT reduced, but did not eliminate, the efficacy of App + EL after crossing, but this pattern was not observed for the reverse sequence. Only the Tower of London task documented improvements related to interventions. In conclusion, the mGMT and App + EL were effective in learning complex tasks and retaining performance after learning a second task.Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register identifier: DRKS00021674.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:踝足矫形器(AFO)通常由脑瘫(CP)儿童使用,但是传统的解决方案无法解决CP儿童之间的异质性和不断变化的需求。一个关键的限制在于当前无源器件无法定制扭矩-角度关系,这对于使支持适应特定的个人需求至关重要。供电的替代品可以提供定制的行为,但经常面临可靠性的挑战,体重,和成本。总的来说,临床医生发现某些障碍阻碍他们的处方。在最近的工作中,开发了可变刚度矫形器(VSO),使刚度定制无需电机或复杂的控制。
    方法:这项工作通过研究其对CP患儿步行表现的影响及其作为评估可变僵硬对病理性步态的影响的潜力来评估VSO(inGAIT-VSO)的儿科版本。收集了三个典型的发育中(TD)儿童和六个患有CP的儿科参与者的数据,这些参与者在两个疗程中涉及步行/平衡任务和问卷。
    结果:inGAIT-VSO的传感器提供了有用的信息,以评估设备的影响。增加inGAIT-VSO的刚度显着降低了参与者的背屈和pi屈。尽管运动范围缩小,峰值恢复扭矩随刚度的增加而增加。总的来说,参与者的步态模式通过减少蹲下步态来改变,防止跌足和支撑体重。与正常情况(仅自己的AFO或鞋子)相比,使用inGAIT-VSO行走时,CP的参与者表现出明显更低的(p<0.05)生理成本。一般来说,与正常情况相比,该装置并未损害参与者的行走和平衡.根据问卷调查结果,inGAIT-VSO易于使用,参与者报告了积极的经历。
    结论:inGAIT-VSO刚度显着影响参与者的前屈和背屈,并产生了有关病理性步态中步行表现的客观数据(例如,施加扭矩和恢复的辅助能量)。这些影响是由集成在设备中的传感器捕获的,而无需使用外部设备。inGAIT-VSO显示了定制AFO刚度并帮助临床医生基于客观指标选择个性化刚度的前景。
    BACKGROUND: Ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) are commonly used by children with cerebral palsy (CP), but traditional solutions are unable to address the heterogeneity and evolving needs amongst children with CP. One key limitation lies in the inability of current passive devices to customize the torque-angle relationship, which is essential to adapt the support to the specific individual needs. Powered alternatives can provide customized behavior, but often face challenges with reliability, weight, and cost. Overall, clinicians find certain barriers that hinder their prescription. In recent work, the Variable Stiffness Orthosis (VSO) was developed, enabling stiffness customization without the need for motors or sophisticated control.
    METHODS: This work evaluates a pediatric version of the VSO (inGAIT-VSO) by investigating its impact on the walking performance of children with CP and its potential to be used as a tool for assessing the effect of variable stiffness on pathological gait. Data was collected for three typical developing (TD) children and six pediatric participants with CP over two sessions involving walking/balance tasks and questionnaires.
    RESULTS: The sensors of the inGAIT-VSO provided useful information to assess the impact of the device. Increasing the stiffness of the inGAIT-VSO significantly reduced participants\' dorsiflexion and plantarflexion. Despite reduced range of motion, the peak restoring torque increased with stiffness. Overall the participants\' gait pattern was altered by reducing crouch gait, preventing drop-foot and supporting body weight. Participants with CP exhibited significantly lower (p < 0.05) physiological cost when walking with the inGAIT-VSO compared to normal condition (own AFO or shoes only). Generally, the device did not impair walking and balance of the participants compared to normal conditions. According to the questionnaire results, the inGAIT-VSO was easy to use and participants reported positive experiences.
    CONCLUSIONS: The inGAIT-VSO stiffnesses significantly affected participants\' plantarflexion and dorsiflexion and yielded objective data regarding walking performance in pathological gait (e.g. ankle angle, exerted torque and restored assistive energy). These effects were captured by the sensors integrated in the device without using external equipment. The inGAIT-VSO shows promise for customizing AFO stiffness and aiding clinicians in selecting a personalized stiffness based on objective metrics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:痴呆损害了痴呆患者自主和独立的能力。他们需要第三方的支持,理想情况下,他们应该尽可能尊重他们的自主权和独立性。支持痴呆症患者对护理人员来说可能是非常沉重的负担,患者数量增加,而潜在护理人员数量下降。直接支持患者或其护理人员的数字辅助技术(DAT)可能有助于弥合支持需求与可用资源之间日益扩大的差距。DAT有可能保持痴呆症患者的自主性和独立性,并提高他们的能力,如果它们在与未来用户的密切互动中设计得当。在我们的研究中,我们专注于道德问题,技术要求,和一般DAT的实施标准,特别是支持痴呆症患者的户外活动。
    方法:我们采用了定性方法,并进行了WorldCafé(2表,n=7)和一个有痴呆症患者的在线焦点小组(n=6),亲戚,医疗保健专业人员,科学家,伦理专家,和数字辅助医疗专家。我们使用内容分析方法对数据进行了描述性分析。
    结果:参与者报告了技术(例如,缺乏Wi-Fi),财务(例如,昂贵的设备或缺乏DAT预算),政治(例如,法律障碍,如欧洲医疗器械法或数据保护法规)以及与用户相关的障碍(例如,缺乏数字能力)在痴呆症护理中实施DAT。讨论的问题包括自治的重要性,独立性,安全,隐私,以及DAT使用中的决策能力问题。参与者确定了自学的机会和好处,了解情况的DAT,并希望建立对痴呆症友好的社区。他们强调个人互动的价值不应取代,而是由DAT支持。
    结论:结果揭示了使用DAT的多个障碍和伦理问题,并为设计和实施DAT提供了建议。需要进一步调查DAT对护理中个人互动的影响以及DAT在痴呆症友好社区中的作用。
    BACKGROUND: Dementia impairs the ability of people with dementia to be autonomous and independent. They need support from third parties, who should ideally respect their autonomy and independence as much as possible. Supporting people with dementia can be very burdensome for caregivers and numbers of patients increase while numbers of potential caregivers decline. Digital assistive technologies (DATs) that directly support patients or their caregivers may help bridging the increasing gap between need of support and available resources. DATs have the potential to preserve the autonomy and independence of people with dementia and promote their abilities, if they are properly designed in close interaction with future users. In our study, we focused on ethical concerns, technological requirements, and implementation criteria for DAT in general and specifically to support outdoor mobility of people with dementia.
    METHODS: We applied a qualitative approach and conducted a World Café (2 tables, n = 7) and an online focus group (n = 6) with people with dementia, relatives, healthcare professionals, scientists, ethics experts, and experts for digitally-assisted medical care. We descriptively analyzed the data using a content analysis approach.
    RESULTS: The participants reported technological (e.g., lack of Wi-Fi), financial (e.g., expensive devices or lack of budget for DATs), political (e.g., legal hurdles such as the European Medical Device Law or data protection regulations) as well as user-related hurdles (e.g., lack of digital competence) for the implementation of DAT in dementia care. Among the issues discussed were the importance of autonomy, independence, safety, privacy, and questions of decision making capacity in DAT\'s use. Participants identified opportunities and benefits in self-learning, situation-aware DATs and wished for dementia-friendly communities. They emphasized the value of personal interaction that should not be replaced, but rather supported by DAT.
    CONCLUSIONS: The results revealed multiple hurdles and ethical concerns for DAT use and provided recommendations for designing and implementing DATs. Further investigations are needed on the impact of DAT on personal interactions in caregiving and the role of DAT in dementia-friendly communities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:间隔检索是一种学习技术,涉及在越来越长的时间间隔后进行重复的内存测试。间隔检索已被证明可以改善阿尔茨海默病(AD)的长期记忆,但从历史上看,在AD患者的日常生活中很难实现。
    目的:本研究旨在确定,在患有AD引起的轻度认知障碍(MCI)的人群中,将间隔检索与机器学习算法相结合以增强记忆保留的移动应用程序的有效性和可行性。具体来说,该应用程序提示用户在简短的每日会话中回答问题,机器学习算法跟踪每个用户的遗忘率,以确定最佳的间距时间表,以防止预期的遗忘。
    方法:在这项试点研究中,61名参与者(年轻人:n=21,34%;健康的老年人:n=20,33%;由于AD而患有MCI的人:n=20,33%)使用该应用程序4周,以学习新的事实并重新学习被遗忘的名字-面孔关联。参与4周期间的特点是每天使用该应用程序回答有关事实和名称的15个问题。在为期4周的学习阶段之后,参与者相隔约1周完成了2次识别记忆测试,它测试了他们使用应用程序研究过的信息以及他们没有研究过的信息的记忆。
    结果:使用移动应用程序1个月后,与基线相比,每位因AD而患有MCI的患者通过该应用研究的新事实的记忆力均得到改善(P<.001).除一名因AD而患有MCI的人(19/20,95%)外,所有患者均表现出超过10个百分点的改善,与年轻人和健康老年人表现出的改善相当。使用该应用程序后,所有参与者组的姓名-面孔关联记忆都得到了类似的改善,但程度较小。此外,对于新的事实和名字-面孔协会,在研究结束时,我们发现任何参与者在使用该应用程序休息约1周后,他们均未发现记忆衰减.关于可用性,在因AD而患有MCI的20人中,16(80%)自我坚持应用程序的自动练习时间表,其中一半(n=10,50%)表示有兴趣继续使用它。
    结论:这些结果表明,早期证据表明,间隔检索移动应用程序对于患有早期AD的人在日常生活中使用都是可行的,并且可以有效地支持最近学习的事实和名字的记忆保留。
    BACKGROUND: Spaced retrieval is a learning technique that involves engaging in repeated memory testing after increasingly lengthy intervals of time. Spaced retrieval has been shown to improve long-term memory in Alzheimer disease (AD), but it has historically been difficult to implement in the everyday lives of individuals with AD.
    OBJECTIVE: This research aims to determine, in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to AD, the efficacy and feasibility of a mobile app that combines spaced retrieval with a machine learning algorithm to enhance memory retention. Specifically, the app prompts users to answer questions during brief daily sessions, and a machine learning algorithm tracks each user\'s rate of forgetting to determine the optimal spacing schedule to prevent anticipated forgetting.
    METHODS: In this pilot study, 61 participants (young adults: n=21, 34%; healthy older adults: n=20, 33%; people with MCI due to AD: n=20, 33%) used the app for 4 weeks to learn new facts and relearn forgotten name-face associations. Participation during the 4-week period was characterized by using the app once per day to answer 15 questions about the facts and names. After the 4-week learning phase, participants completed 2 recognition memory tests approximately 1 week apart, which tested memory for information they had studied using the app as well as information they had not studied.
    RESULTS: After using the mobile app for 1 month, every person with MCI due to AD demonstrated improvements in memory for new facts that they had studied via the app compared to baseline (P<.001). All but one person with MCI due to AD (19/20, 95%) showed improvements of more than 10 percentage points, comparable to the improvements shown by young adults and healthy older adults. Memory for name-face associations was similarly improved for all participant groups after using the app but to a lesser degree. Furthermore, for both new facts and name-face associations, we found no memory decay for any participant group after they took a break of approximately 1 week from using the app at the end of the study. Regarding usability, of the 20 people with MCI due to AD, 16 (80%) self-adhered to the app\'s automated practice schedule, and half of them (n=10, 50%) expressed an interest in continuing to use it.
    CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate early evidence that spaced retrieval mobile apps are both feasible for people with early-stage AD to use in their everyday lives and effective for supporting memory retention of recently learned facts and name-face associations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    残疾影响日常生活活动,导致不安全的条件,生活质量差,以及对他人和辅助技术的依赖。尽管准入有限,需求得不到满足,辅助技术使用户能够参与教育并成为社区的独立成员。高等教育中的残疾学生在日常活动中面临许多挑战,研究领域的证据有限。因此,本研究旨在探讨高等教育中残疾学生的辅助技术体验和日常生活挑战。
    冈达大学采用了描述性定性研究设计,Gondar,埃塞俄比亚,2022年12月20日至2023年1月20日之间。采用目的性抽样方法招募14名残疾学生。使用半结构化问卷进行了深入访谈。使用OpenCode版本4软件进行编码和自反主题分析方法进行分析。
    共有14名残疾学生参加了深度访谈。出现了四个主要主题,其中包括日常生活活动,对残疾人的态度,无障碍障碍,并获得辅助技术。
    残疾学生日常生活活动的障碍是基础设施的可及性差,缺乏无障碍格式的教学/学习材料,和消极的态度。本研究的发现是需要支持学生在高等教育他们的学业成绩,并设计适当的康复战略和政策的可及性的物理基础设施,包容性教育,并提供辅助技术。
    UNASSIGNED: Disability influences activities of daily living, leading to unsafe conditions, poor quality of life, and dependence on others and assistive technologies. Despite limited access and unmet needs, assistive technology enables users to participate in education and be independent members of their community. Students with disabilities in higher education face many challenges in their day-to-day activities and evidence is limited in the study area. Therefore, this study aimed to explore assistive technology experience and daily living challenges among students with disabilities in higher education.
    UNASSIGNED: A descriptive qualitative study design was employed at the University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia, between December 20, 2022, and January 20, 2023. A purposive sampling method was employed to recruit 14 students with disabilities. An in-depth interview was employed using semi-structured questionnaires. Open Code version 4 software for coding and reflexive thematic analysis approach was employed for the analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 14 students with disabilities were included in an in-depth interview. Four main themes emerged, which included activities of daily living, attitudes toward people with disabilities, barriers to accessibility, and access to assistive technology.
    UNASSIGNED: Barriers to activities of daily living among students with disabilities were poor accessibility of infrastructural facilities, lack of teaching/learning materials in an accessible format, and negative attitudes. The present study\'s finding is needed to support students in higher education for their academic achievement and to design appropriate rehabilitation strategies and policies on the accessibility of physical infrastructures, inclusive education, and the provision of assistive technology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:家庭自动化可以为残疾人带来重要成果,包括增强独立性。尽管澳大利亚和其他发达国家在家庭自动化上花费了数百万美元,到目前为止,这种辅助技术还没有经济评估。
    方法:进行了家庭自动化研究的社会投资回报分析。主要数据是通过对家庭自动化消费者和其他关键利益相关者的定性访谈收集的。包括职业治疗师,脊柱康复医生,同行支持倡导者,以及家庭自动化提供商的管理人员和技术人员(n=17)。该分析得到了(1)来自家庭自动化结果范围审查的次要数据,以及(2)额外的文献检索,以确定合适的财务代理,并估计家庭自动化用户预期体验每个结果的比例。场景方法与三个家庭自动化场景一起使用,这些场景开发的复杂性和成本不断增加,以计算社会投资回报。
    结果:确定了使用家庭自动化的八个结果,包括减少对照顾者和家庭成员的依赖,独立性增强,改善了能量和舒适度。在10年受益期内,每投资1美元,社会投资回报从38.80美元(低成本)到15.10美元(高成本)不等,减少护理服务时间的财务代理对社会回报率的贡献最大。即使是最高的成本情景也在受益期的第一年内以社会价值偿还。
    结论:这项研究表明,家庭自动化代表了一项合理的投资,并对残疾人的整体生活质量产生了重大影响。仅关注护理人员工作时间的财务节省,就应该成为资助者认识到家庭自动化价值并继续资助这项辅助技术的有力证据。
    一位消费者代表是项目指导小组的成员,在项目的所有阶段都支持研究团队。
    结论:当人们受伤时,他们的残疾可以阻止他们在家里做他们曾经能够做的事情。技术可以帮助残疾人做一些事情,比如打开和关闭门,通过按下按钮关闭水龙头,所以他们不必等待有人来帮助他们。这项技术可能很昂贵,但是没有人看过它是否值得。我们采访了一些使用这种技术的残疾人,他们告诉我们他们的生活变得更好了,现在他们使用了这项技术。例如,他们告诉我们他们能够为自己做事,他们不需要那么多照顾者,他们的心理健康更好。我们与企业讨论了可以在家庭中使用的不同类型技术的成本。然后,我们对残疾人告诉我们他们的生活更好的方式进行了美元估值。例如,为了更好的心理健康,我们计算了看心理学家一年的费用。我们发现,改善残疾人生活的方式的价值至少是技术成本的15倍。因此,这项研究表明,这项技术是物有所值的,并改善了严重受伤后残疾人的生活。
    BACKGROUND: Home automation can deliver important outcomes for people with disabilities, including enhanced independence. Despite the millions of dollars spent on home automation in Australia and other developed nations, to date, there has been no economic evaluation of this type of assistive technology.
    METHODS: A social return on investment analysis of home automation study was undertaken. Primary data were collected using qualitative interviews with home automation consumers and other key stakeholders, including occupational therapists, a spinal rehabilitation physician, peer support advocate, and managers and technical personnel from home automation providers (n = 17). The analysis was supported by (1) secondary data from a scoping review on outcomes from home automation and (2) additional literature searches to identify suitable financial proxies and to make estimates of the proportion of home automation users expected to experience each outcome. A scenario approach was used with three home automation scenarios developed with increasing complexity and costs to calculate the social return on investment.
    RESULTS: Eight outcomes from the use of home automation were identified, including reduced reliance on carers and family members, increased independence, and improved energy and comfort. The social return on investment ranged from $38.80 (low cost) to $15.10 (high cost) for every $1 invested across a 10-year benefit period, with the financial proxy for reduced care attendant hours contributing the most to the social return ratio. Even the highest cost scenario was repaid in social value within the first year of the benefit period.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that home automation represents a sound investment and has a significant impact on the overall quality of life of people with disabilities. Focusing on the financial savings in care attendant hours alone should be compelling evidence for funders to recognise home automation\'s value and continue to fund this assistive technology.
    UNASSIGNED: A consumer representative was a member of the project steering group, which supported the research team at all stages of the project.
    CONCLUSIONS: When people get injured, their disability can stop them doing things around the home that they used to be able to do. Technology can help people with disabilities do things like open and close doors and turn off taps by pressing a button, so they do not have to wait for someone to help them. This technology can be expensive, but no one has looked at if it is worth the money. We spoke to some people with disabilities who used this type of technology, and they told us their lives were better now they used this technology. For example, they told us they were able to do things for themselves, they did not need carers as much, and they had better mental health. We spoke to businesses about the costs of different types of technology that can be used in the home. We then put a dollar value on the ways people with disabilities told us their lives were better. For example, for better mental health, we worked out how much it would cost to see a psychologist for 1 year. We found that the dollar value of the ways in which people with disabilities\' lives were improved was at least 15 times more than the costs of the technology. This study therefore shows that this technology is worth the money and improves the lives of people with disabilities following serious injury.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    研究报告说,语音到文本应用程序(STT)可以支持在文本制作中写作困难的学生。然而,现有的研究是稀疏的,显示混合结果,并且缺乏有关STT干预措施及其在学校中适用性的信息。因此,这项研究旨在调查针对STT的系统和密集的辅助技术干预是否可以改善文本生成。使用了修改后的多基线跨主题设计,涉及八名中学生,四个挪威人和四个瑞典人。他们的STT制作的叙述性文本是在干预和生产力期间和之后收集的,准确度,并对文本质量进行了分析。键盘输入是基线对照条件。结果表明,八名学生中有七名提高了文本生产率,单词级准确性的比例得到了保持或提高。标点符号的使用在基线技能较差的参与者中取得了进展。大多数学生的STT产生的文本至少具有与键盘输入相似的意义和文本质量比率。然而,变化的幅度和发展模式各不相同,三个学生表现出最显著的影响。总之,这项研究的干预似乎有利于最初指导STT,和进展监测指导单独调整未来的干预措施,如平衡生产力和正式语言方面。使用STT消除拼写障碍为学生提供了提高其高阶技能的机会,如词汇多样性和整体文本质量。此外,可见的进步,比如产生更长文本的能力,可能会激励继续使用STT。然而,这种发展可能并不总是立竿见影的。
    语音到文本(STT)可能是开发具有严重阅读和写作困难的学生的文本生成的有效工具。例如,增强的文本长度可以为教师提供更多的反馈材料,引导学生改进文本制作。文本到语音可以通过收听产生的句子和文本来促进修订过程,从而进一步提高STT在文本产生中的有用性。通过持续监控学生的STT使用情况和文本制作,教师可以调整内容以进行进一步的干预,以满足个人需求,例如句子构造和文本规划。早期STT干预似乎有益,绕过拼写时,允许更多的时间在文本制作中练习高级技能。
    Studies report that speech-to-text applications (STT) may support students with writing difficulties in text production. However, existing research is sparse, shows mixed results, and lacks information on STT interventions and their applicability in schools. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate whether a systematic and intensive assistive technology intervention focusing on STT can improve text production. A modified multiple-baseline across-subject design was used involving eight middle school students, four Norwegian and four Swedish. Their STT-produced narrative texts were collected during and after the intervention and the productivity, accuracy, and text quality were analysed. Keyboarding was the baseline control condition. The results demonstrated that seven of the eight students increased text productivity and that the proportion of word-level accuracy was maintained or improved. The use of punctuation progressed in participants with poor baseline skills. Most students\' STT-produced texts had at least a similar ratio of meaningfulness and text quality as keyboarding. However, the magnitude of the changes and development patterns varied, with three students showing the most notable impacts. In conclusion, this study\'s intervention seemed beneficial in initially instructing STT, and the progress monitoring guided individually adapted future interventions such as balancing productivity and formal language aspects. Removing the spelling barrier with STT provided an opportunity for students to improve their higher-order skills, such as vocabulary diversity and overall text quality. Furthermore, visible progress, such as the ability to produce longer texts, might motivate continued STT usage. However, such development may not always be immediate.
    Speech-to-text (STT) may be an effective tool for developing text production in students with severe reading and writing difficulties. For example, enhanced text length can provide teachers with more material for feedback, guiding students towards improved text production.Text-to-speech may further enhance the usefulness of STT in text production by facilitating the revision process through listening to produced sentences and texts.By continuously monitoring students’ STT usage and text production, teachers can tailor the content for further interventions to address individual needs such as sentence construction and text planning.Early STT intervention seems beneficial, allowing more time to practise advanced skills in text production when bypassing spelling.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    增材制造(3D打印)越来越多地用于医疗保健。一些康复专业人员使用3D打印技术进行矫形器,假肢,和辅助技术(AT)。然而,轶事证据表明,许多从业者对在他们的实践中采用3D打印持保留态度,这方面的实证研究是有限的。这项研究的目的是记录我在学习3D打印时的经验。在这项民族志研究中,在学习3D打印的过程中收集了文物的日志条目和照片。这些数据使用反身性主题分析进行了分析。确定了三个主题:学习3D打印的动力,体验挑战并实施可能的解决方案,并在学习3D打印方面实现发展里程碑。这些里程碑为新学习者提供了实用的见解和解决方案,为3D打印学习之旅提供了路线图。这种个人经验在学习在康复领域使用3D打印的背景下提供了机会并提出了挑战。希望这项研究能激励其他人探索3D打印,并有可能为学生和康复专业人员的3D打印培训计划的开发做出贡献。
    这项研究有助于了解残疾人使用3D打印机的情况。无论是在职业治疗或非职业治疗的背景下。通过强调本研究中记录的问题和挑战,没有事先接触过3D打印的个人在开始自己的3D打印旅程时可以更好地管理他们的期望。这种经历可以为职业治疗学生和其他康复计划的学生提供灵感,分享他们与3D打印相遇的故事。可能引发新的实践方法。通过3D打印获得的知识和经验可能有助于开发3D打印培训研讨会。
    Additive manufacturing (3D printing) is increasingly utilized in healthcare. Some rehabilitation professionals employ 3D printing for orthoses, prostheses, and assistive technologies (AT). However, anecdotal evidence suggests that many practitioners have reservations about adopting 3D printing into their practices, and empirical research in this area is limited. The aim of the study was to document my experience while learning 3D printing. In this autoethnographic study, journal entries and photos of the artifacts were collected during the process of learning 3D printing. These data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Three themes were identified: Being motivated to learn 3D printing, Experiencing challenges and implementing possible solutions, and Achieving developmental milestones in learning 3D printing. These milestones offered practical insights and solutions for new learners by providing a roadmap for navigating the journey of learning 3D printing. This personal experience offered opportunities and posed challenges in the context of learning to use 3D printing in the rehabilitation field. It is hoped that this study will inspire others to explore 3D printing and potentially contribute to the development of 3D printing training programs for students and rehabilitation professionals.
    The study contributes to understanding of 3D printers use for individuals with disabilities, whether in occupational therapy or non-occupational therapy contexts.By highlighting the issues and challenges documented in this study, individuals with no prior exposure to 3D printing can better manage their expectations when embarking on their own 3D printing journey.This experience can serve as an inspiration for occupational therapy students and other students in rehabilitation programs to share their own stories about their encounters with 3D printing, potentially sparking new approaches to practice.The knowledge and experience gained through 3D printing might help to develop a 3D printing training workshop.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在探讨中国失能老年人辅助器具使用者的特点及影响因素。
    方法:对四川省13510名失能老人进行调查。使用Barthel日常生活活动量表评估残疾,精神状态,感官知觉,和社会参与度评估。采用单因素分析和logistic回归分析确定影响因素。
    结果:参与者中辅助器具使用率为79.2%(10,700/13,510,95%CI78.5%-79.9%),轮椅是最常用的设备。各种因素被发现影响设备的使用,包括残疾级别,躯体残疾,年龄,看护者,收入,看护人费,和生活状况(p<0.05)。此外,确定了与设备使用频率相关的几个因素,比如躯体残疾,教育背景,收入,看护人费,生活状况,获取辅助设备的途径,辅助设备使用的持续时间,辅助设备教育,和满意度(p<0.05)。
    结论:在中国老年人中使用辅助器具很普遍。有很多因素会影响辅助器具的使用,可为辅助器具领域相关政策的制定提供参考。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the characteristics of assistive device users and influencing factors among disabled elderly in China.
    METHODS: A total of 13,510 disabled elderly in Sichuan Province were surveyed. Disability was assessed using the Barthel Activities of Daily Living Scale, mental status, sensory perception, and social engagement evaluation. Univariate analysis and logistic regression analysis were employed to identify the impact factors.
    RESULTS: The prevalence of assistive device utilization among participants was 79.2% (10,700/13,510, 95% CI 78.5%-79.9%), with the wheelchair being the most commonly used device. Various factors were found to influence the usage of the device, including disability level, somatic disability, age, caregivers, income, caregiver fees, and living situation (p < .05). Additionally, several factors were identified associated with the frequency of device usage, such as somatic disability, education background, income, caregiver fees, living situation, access to acquire assistive devices, duration of assistive device usage, education on assistive devices, and satisfaction level (p < .05).
    CONCLUSIONS: The use of assistive devices among elderly individuals in China is prevalent. There are many factors that affect the use of assistive devices, which can provide a reference for the formulation of policies in the field of assistive devices.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号