antiepileptic drugs

抗癫痫药物
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:患有幕上海绵状畸形(SCMs)的患者通常会出现癫痫发作。海绵体瘤相关癫痫(CRE)的一线治疗包括保守治疗(抗癫痫药(AED))和手术。我们比较了早期(≤6个月)与CRE患者的癫痫发作结果延迟(>6个月)手术。方法:我们比较了在我们的大容量脑血管中心(2010年1月1日至2020年7月31日)手术治疗的CRE患者与SCM的结果。包括1例散发性SCM和≥1年随访的患者。主要结果是国际抗癫痫联盟(ILAE)1级癫痫发作自由和AED独立性。结果:在63例CRE患者中(26例女性,37名男性;平均±SD年龄,36.1±14.6年),48(76%)与15例(24%)早期接受(平均值±标准差,2.1±1.7个月)与延迟(平均值±SD,6.2±7.1年)手术。大多数(32(67%))在1次癫痫发作后出现早期手术;所有延迟手术的癫痫发作≥2次。7例(47%)延迟手术患者患有耐药性癫痫。随访时(平均值±标准差,5.4±3.3年),与延迟手术的CRE患者相比,早期手术的CRE患者更可能具有ILAE1级癫痫发作自由度和AED独立性(92%(44/48)与53%(8/15),p=0.002;65%(31/48)与33%(5/15),分别为p=0.03)。结论:早期CRE手术表现出比延迟手术更好的癫痫发作结果。需要多中心前瞻性研究来验证这些发现。
    Background: Patients with supratentorial cavernous malformations (SCMs) commonly present with seizures. First-line treatments for cavernoma-related epilepsy (CRE) include conservative management (antiepileptic drugs (AEDs)) and surgery. We compared seizure outcomes of CRE patients after early (≤6 months) vs. delayed (>6 months) surgery. Methods: We compared outcomes of CRE patients with SCMs surgically treated at our large-volume cerebrovascular center (1 January 2010-31 July 2020). Patients with 1 sporadic SCM and ≥1-year follow-up were included. Primary outcomes were International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) class 1 seizure freedom and AED independence. Results: Of 63 CRE patients (26 women, 37 men; mean ± SD age, 36.1 ± 14.6 years), 48 (76%) vs. 15 (24%) underwent early (mean ± SD, 2.1 ± 1.7 months) vs. delayed (mean ± SD, 6.2 ± 7.1 years) surgery. Most (32 (67%)) with early surgery presented after 1 seizure; all with delayed surgery had ≥2 seizures. Seven (47%) with delayed surgery had drug-resistant epilepsy. At follow-up (mean ± SD, 5.4 ± 3.3 years), CRE patients with early surgery were more likely to have ILAE class 1 seizure freedom and AED independence than those with delayed surgery (92% (44/48) vs. 53% (8/15), p = 0.002; and 65% (31/48) vs. 33% (5/15), p = 0.03, respectively). Conclusions: Early CRE surgery demonstrated better seizure outcomes than delayed surgery. Multicenter prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:Dravet综合征(DS)是一种罕见且严重的儿童癫痫,通常对常规抗癫痫药物难以治疗。新的证据表明,大麻二酚(CBD)为DS提供治疗益处。这篇综述旨在根据来自10项临床试验的数据评估CBD在DS儿科患者中的疗效和安全性。
    方法:进行了综述,以确定评估CBD在诊断为DS的儿科患者中的疗效和安全性的临床试验。PubMed,MEDLINE,Scopus,WebofScience,和相关灰色文献进行了系统搜索,以查找截至2023年10月的相关文章,并纳入了最近10年的临床试验。搜索策略包含与“大麻”相关的受控词汇术语和关键字,\"\"Dravet综合征,“和”儿科患者。\"
    结果:分析显示有希望的疗效结果。值得注意的是,CBD显示癫痫发作频率大幅减少,一些患者实现了癫痫发作的自由。研究结果强调了不同患者亚组之间CBD疗效的一致性。CBD的安全性通常是可以接受的,不良事件通常是可控的。
    结论:本综述整合了多项临床试验的证据,肯定CBD作为DS儿科患者有希望的治疗选择的潜力。虽然需要进一步的研究来解决现有的知识差距,CBD的疗效和可接受的安全性使其成为DS治疗工具的重要补充。
    BACKGROUND: Dravet Syndrome (DS) is a rare and severe form of childhood epilepsy that is often refractory to conventional antiepileptic drugs. Emerging evidence suggests that Cannabidiol (CBD) offer therapeutic benefits for DS. This review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CBD in pediatric patients with DS based on data from ten clinical trials.
    METHODS: A review was conducted to identify clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of CBD in pediatric patients diagnosed with DS. PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and relevant grey literature were systematically searched for relevant articles up to October 2023, and clinical trials within the last 10 years were included. The search strategy incorporated controlled vocabulary terms and keywords related to \"Cannabidiol,\" \"Dravet Syndrome,\" and \"pediatric patients.\"
    RESULTS: The analysis revealed promising efficacy outcomes. Notably, CBD demonstrated substantial reductions in seizure frequency, with some patients achieving seizure freedom. The findings emphasised the consistency of CBD\'s efficacy across different patient subgroups. The safety profile of CBD was generally acceptable, with adverse events often being manageable.
    CONCLUSIONS: This review consolidates evidence from multiple clinical trials, affirming the potential of CBD as a promising treatment option for pediatric patients with DS. While further research is needed to address existing knowledge gaps, CBD\'s efficacy and acceptable safety profile make it a valuable addition to the therapeutic tools for DS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    目的:本荟萃分析的目的是确定母体暴露于叶酸拮抗剂是否与后代先天性心脏病发病率增加有关。
    方法:对截至2023年8月21日的MEDLINE(PubMed)和EMBASE数据库中的文章进行了全面搜索。搜索策略不受研究设计的限制,而仅针对英语文章。
    结果:对6项队列研究和5项横断面研究的分析,发表于1976年至2020年,显示先天性心脏病发病率显著增加(比值比1.55,95%置信区间,1.28-1.87)与对照组相比,暴露于叶酸拮抗剂时。进一步的亚组分析显示,暴露于二氢叶酸还原酶抑制剂和抗癫痫药物的比率分别增加。当按研究时间分层分析时,没有观察到差异。
    结论:在受孕前12周以及妊娠第二个月和第三个月服用叶酸拮抗剂后,先天性心脏病的易感性有统计学意义的升高。值得注意的是,据报道,补充叶酸对先天性心脏病的保护作用与二氢叶酸还原酶抑制剂有关,但与抗癫痫药物无关.
    OBJECTIVE: The objective of this meta-analysis was to determine whether maternal exposure to folate antagonists is associated with increased rates of congenital heart disease in offspring.
    METHODS: A comprehensive search for articles in the MEDLINE (PubMed) and EMBASE databases published up to 21 August 2023 was performed. The search strategy was not limited by study design but only for articles in the English language.
    RESULTS: Analysis of 6 cohort studies and 5 cross-sectional studies, published between 1976 and 2020, showed significant increase in rate of congenital heart disease (odds ratio 1.55, 95% confidence interval, 1.28-1.87) when exposed to folate antagonists compared with the control. Further subgroup analysis showed the increased rate for exposure to both dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors and antiepileptic drugs separately. No differences were observed when analyses were stratified by timing of study.
    CONCLUSIONS: Administration of folate antagonists within the 12-week period preceding conception and throughout the second and third months of gestation exhibited a statistically significant elevation in the susceptibility to congenital heart diseases. Notably, the protective effect of folic acid supplementation was reported in cases of congenital heart disease linked to dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors but not that associated with antiepileptic drugs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:癫痫是由大脑功能障碍引起的,其特点是对经常复发的无缘无故的癫痫发作有持久的处置,连同神经学,认知,心理,和条件的社会影响,通常使用涉及抗癫痫药(AEDs)的长期,有时是终生的药物进行管理。为了确认癫痫的诊断,应报告至少两次间隔超过24小时的无缘无故癫痫发作。这种疾病影响儿童和成人。与普通人群相比,癫痫患者更容易出现性功能障碍,这往往会导致生活质量低下。所涉及的病理生理学包括癫痫和AEDs对下丘脑-垂体-性腺轴控制的影响,因此导致睾丸或卵巢功能障碍的高风险,导致癫痫患者性功能障碍。
    目的:本综述旨在强调关注发展性功能障碍与精神病合并症的风险的关联的各种研究。主要是抑郁和焦虑,影响癫痫患者的生活质量。
    方法:搜索方法涉及2018年至2023年之间发布的GoogleScholar和PubMed数据库中的文章。“性功能障碍”,\"癫痫\",“抑郁症”,\"焦虑\",“生活质量”是用于搜索文章的关键词。使用的关键字之间使用了布尔运算符“AND”和“OR”。在此之后,根据纳入和排除标准,本综述共纳入15篇文章.
    结论:该综述的结论是,癫痫患者通常会受到性功能障碍的影响,同时伴有主要涉及抑郁和焦虑的精神合并症,从而影响他们的生活质量,正如各种研究所证明的那样。性功能障碍是癫痫患者常见但未被诊断的疾病,因为它带有污名。因此,神经学家必须对这个问题保持高度怀疑。此外,在通常的癫痫检查中,应增加性功能障碍的筛查和监测.
    BACKGROUND:  Epilepsy is caused by dysfunction in the brain, which is characterized by an enduring disposition for unprovoked seizures that reoccur often, along with the neurological, cognitive, psychological, and social effects of the condition, which are often managed with prolonged and sometimes lifelong medications that involve antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). To confirm the diagnosis of epilepsy, at least two unprovoked seizures occurring greater than 24 hours apart should be reported. This illness affects both children and adults. Patients with epilepsy are more likely to experience sexual dysfunction compared to the general population, which often leads to a poor quality of life. The pathophysiology involved consists of the impact of epilepsy and AEDs on the control of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, consequently resulting in a high risk of developing testicular or ovarian dysfunction, leading to sexual dysfunction in epilepsy patients.
    OBJECTIVE:  This review aims to highlight various studies focusing on the association of developing the risk of sexual dysfunction with psychiatric comorbidities, mainly depression and anxiety, that impact the quality of life in epilepsy patients.
    METHODS:  The search methodology involved articles from the Google Scholar and PubMed databases published between 2018 and 2023. \"Sexual dysfunction\", \"epilepsy\", \"depression\", \"anxiety\", and \"quality of life\" were the keywords used to search the articles. The Boolean operator \"AND\" and \"OR\" were used in between the keywords used. Following this, a total of 15 articles were included in the review based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
    CONCLUSIONS:  The review concluded that epilepsy patients are often affected by sexual dysfunction along with associated psychiatric comorbidities that mainly involve depression and anxiety, consequently impacting their quality of life, as demonstrated by various studies. Sexual dysfunction is a common yet underdiagnosed condition in epilepsy patients due to the stigma attached to it. Hence, neurologists must keep a high index of suspicion for this problem. Furthermore, screening and monitoring for sexual dysfunction should be added to the usual epilepsy work-up.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤(PCNSL)占原发性脑肿瘤的不到5%。癫痫发作是脑肿瘤的常见表现;然而,关于患病率的文献,特点,PCNSL患者癫痫发作的肿瘤学意义有限,抗癫痫药物(AEDs)的管理尚不清楚。这篇综述旨在总结PCNSL癫痫发作的现有知识,他们与手术的潜在联系,肿瘤治疗,存活率,和AED的管理。
    方法:根据PRISMA建议进行了系统评价,包括1953年至2023年之间发表的描述PCNSL患者癫痫发作的文章。
    结果:搜索确定了282项研究,其中包括21个。高达33%的PCNSL患者出现癫痫发作,主要是在最初的演讲中。几乎没有发现关于整个疾病过程中癫痫发作发生率变化的信息,没有发现癫痫发作频率的细节,耐药患者的百分比,或缓解时癫痫发作的演变。年龄更小,皮质位置,免疫缺陷已被确定为癫痫发作的潜在危险因素,但是证据非常有限。越来越多地使用强力治疗,包括自体干细胞移植的强化化疗和CAR-T细胞的免疫疗法与癫痫发作的发生率更高相关。PCNSL中癫痫发作发展与患者死亡率之间的关系仍然未知。没有关于AED预防或在PCNSL中使用特定AED的数据。
    结论:需要进一步的研究来调查更大的PCNSL队列中的癫痫发作,为了澄清它们的患病率,更好地描述它们,识别风险因素,分析生存率,并对AED管理提出建议。我们建议遵循一般实践指南,以治疗有症状的脑肿瘤癫痫发作,并且不要在PCNSL中规定AED预防。
    BACKGROUND: Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) accounts for less than 5% of primary brain tumors. Epileptic seizures are a common manifestation of brain tumors; however, literature on the prevalence, characteristics, and oncological implications of seizures in patients with PCNSL is limited, and the management of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is unclear. This review aimed to summarize the existing knowledge on seizures in PCNSL, their potential association with surgery, oncological treatment, survival rates, and management of AEDs.
    METHODS: A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA recommendations and included articles published between 1953 and 2023 describing seizures in patients with PCNSL.
    RESULTS: The search identified 282 studies, of which 21 were included. Up to 33% of patients with PCNSL developed seizures, mostly at the initial presentation. Little information was found on changes in seizure incidence through the course of the disease, and no details were found on seizure frequency, the percentage of treatment-resistant patients, or the evolution of seizures at remission. Younger age, cortical location, and immunodeficiency have been identified as potential risk factors for seizures, but evidence is very limited. The growing use of vigorous treatments including intensive chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation and immunotherapy with CAR-T cells is associated with a higher incidence of seizures. The association between seizure development and patient mortality in PCNSL remains unknown. There are no data on AED prophylaxis or the use of specific AEDs in PCNSL.
    CONCLUSIONS: Further studies are needed to investigate seizures in larger cohorts of PCNSL, to clarify their prevalence, better characterize them, identify risk factors, analyze survival rates, and make recommendations on AED management. We recommend following general practice guidelines for seizures symptomatic of brain tumors and not to prescribe AED prophylaxis in PCNSL.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    目的:抗癫痫药物(ASM)通常根据其增强伴随给药药物代谢的倾向分为酶诱导剂和非酶诱导剂。这项系统评价和网络荟萃分析旨在根据对ASM诱导的敏感底物药物浓度降低的比较评估,将单个ASM列为细胞色素P450(CYP)3A诱导剂。
    方法:该方案已在PROSPERO(CRD4202235846)注册,并遵循PRISMA标准。我们搜索了MEDLINE,EMBASE,和Cochrane,直到2023年3月14日,没有初始日期限制。另外通过FDA数据库获得数据。研究必须是前瞻性的,ASM单药治疗≥5天。主要参数是用ASM处理后CYP3A底物的浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)的变化幅度。使用标准化平均差(SMD)作为使用成对方法在ASM之间进行间接比较的点估计。使用PKclin工具评估偏差风险。
    结果:我们确定了14个开放标签,370名参与者的固定序列研究。600mg/天的卡马西平的作用大小与300mg/天的苯妥英(SMD-0.06;95CI-0.18-0.07)和200mg/天的锡溴酸盐(SMD-0.11;95CI-0.26-0.04)的作用大小没有差异。卡马西平600毫克/天是最强的CYP3A诱导剂(P评分0.88),其次是卡马西平400毫克/天(0.83),苯妥英300毫克/天(0.79),和cenobamate200毫克/天(0.73)。Esilicarbazepine(800mg/天)的排名高于锡丁酸酯100mg/天和奥卡西平900mg/天(分别为0.60、0.39和0.37)。
    结论:尽管研究数量有限,我们的NMA强调ASM对CYP3A底物代谢的影响程度是剂量依赖性的连续性。如果可能,作为诱导物的ASM分类应应用针对结果定制的截止值。处方者应监测血浆浓度或CYP3A底物的临床效果,并考虑相应地选择合并用药。
    OBJECTIVE: Antiseizure medications (ASMs) are commonly categorized as enzyme-inducers and non-enzyme-inducers based on their propensity to enhance the metabolism of concomitantly administered drugs. This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to rank ASMs as cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A)-inducers based on a comparative assessment of ASM-induced reduction in the concentrations of sensitive substrate drugs.
    METHODS: The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; CRD42022335846), and the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) standards were followed. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane until March 14, 2023 without an initial date restriction. Data were additionally obtained via the US Food and Drug Administration database. Studies had to be prospective, with ASM monotherapy for ≥5 days. The primary parameter was the magnitude of change in the area under the concentration-time curve of CYP3A substrates following treatment with the ASM. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was used as the point estimate for the indirect comparisons between ASMs using the pairwise method. Bias risk was assessed using the PKclin tool.
    RESULTS: We identified 14 open-label, fixed-sequence studies with 370 participants. The effect size of 600 mg/day carbamazepine did not differ from those of 300 mg/day phenytoin (SMD = -.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -.18 to .07) and 200 mg/day cenobamate (SMD = -.11, 95% CI = -.26 to .04). Carbamazepine at 600 mg/day was the strongest CYP3A-inducer (P-score = .88), followed by carbamazepine 400 mg/day (.83), phenytoin 300 mg/day (.79), and cenobamate 200 mg/day (.73). Eslicarbazepine (800 mg/day) ranked higher than cenobamate 100 mg/day and oxcarbazepine 900 mg/day (.60, .39, and .37, respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: Despite the limited number of studies, our network meta-analysis emphasizes that the magnitude of ASM effects on CYP3A substrate metabolism is a dose-dependent continuum. When possible, ASM classification as inducers should apply cutoff values tailored to the outcome. Prescribers should monitor plasma concentrations or clinical effects of CYP3A substrates and consider selecting concomitant medications accordingly.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:术后早期癫痫发作可能会损害患者的康复并增加并发症的风险。这项研究的目的是确定脑膜瘤切除术后预防癫痫发作是否有任何优势。
    方法:本系统综述按照PRISMA指南进行。pubmed,WebofScience,Embase,科学直接,直到2023年4月,科克伦一直在寻找论文。
    结果:在九项研究中,对3249例患者进行了评估,其中984名患者接受了抗癫痫药物(AEDs)。在接受抗癫痫药物(AED)治疗的患者和未接受抗癫痫药物治疗的患者之间,癫痫发作事件的频率没有显着差异。(RR1.22,95%CI0.66至2.40;I2=57%)。术后癫痫发作发生在早期时间段(<7天)的5%(95%CI:1%至9%),在后期(>7天)为9%(95%CI:1%至17%),研究之间具有显著的异质性(I2=91%和97%,分别)。在首次发作的患者中,术后癫痫发作率在早期为2%(95%CI:0%~6%),在晚期增加至6%(95%CI:0%~15%).高度异质性导致在所有分析中都使用随机效应模型。
    结论:目前的证据没有为预防性AED药物预防脑膜瘤切除术患者术后癫痫发作的有效性提供足够的支持。这强调了在这种情况下考虑诊断标准和进行个体患者分析以指导临床决策的重要性。
    BACKGROUND: Seizures in the early postoperative period may impair patient recovery and increase the risk of complications. The aim of this study is to determine whether there is any advantage in postoperative seizure prophylaxis following meningioma resection.
    METHODS: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. PUBMED, Web of Science, Embase, Science Direct, and Cochrane were searched for papers until April 2023.
    RESULTS: Among nine studies, a total of 3249 patients were evaluated, of which 984 patients received antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). No significant difference was observed in the frequency of seizure events between patients who were treated with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and those who were not. (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.66 to 2.40; I2 = 57%). Postoperative seizures occurred in 5% (95% CI: 1% to 9%) within the early time period (<7 days), and 9% (95% CI: 1% to 17%) in the late time period (>7 days), with significant heterogeneity between the studies (I2 = 91% and 97%, respectively). In seizure-naive patients, the rate of postoperative seizures was 2% (95% CI: 0% to 6%) in the early period and increased to 6% (95% CI: 0% to 15%) in the late period. High heterogeneity led to the use of random-effects models in all analyses.
    CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence does not provide sufficient support for the effectiveness of prophylactic AED medications in preventing postoperative seizures in patients undergoing meningioma resection. This underscores the importance of considering diagnostic criteria and conducting individual patient analysis to guide clinical decision-making in this context.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    与普通人群相比,癫痫患者的自杀风险是癫痫患者的三倍,即使在没有精神健康合并症的情况下对自杀的社会人口统计学相关因素进行了调整,这些患者的自杀风险仍然增加了一倍.在美国(US)食品和药物管理局(FDA)警告提示关于自杀和抗癫痫药物(AED)之间的关联的黑匣子警告之后,进行了几项研究,其结果是模棱两可的,一些人证明自杀和AED之间存在正相关,而其他人没有。这篇系统的文献综述旨在研究仅用于治疗癫痫时自杀与AED之间的关系。
    使用预定义的搜索语言在PubMed上进行了无时间限制的全面文献检索。然后对搜索结果进行系统的筛选过程。在总共443篇满足预定义的纳入和排除标准的文章中,有8篇被纳入最终数据提取的审查中。
    三项研究发现,与自杀相关的行为和使用左乙拉西坦治疗癫痫之间存在显著关联。一项研究报道,普瑞巴林的使用与40岁以下癫痫患者和高AED负荷与自杀倾向呈正相关。独立于抑郁症。其余四项研究报告了精神病合并症的阳性家族史和个人病史与癫痫自杀之间的显着关联。
    尽管存在一些方法上的限制,这篇综述发现左乙拉西坦的使用与精神健康合并症和癫痫自杀发生之间存在关联.更大的前景,需要克服现有研究局限性的随机研究,以提供关于癫痫和使用AED患者自杀发生的明确证据.
    UNASSIGNED: Compared to the general population, the risk of suicide is three times higher in patients with epilepsy and remains doubled for these patients even after adjusting for sociodemographic correlates of suicide in the absence of mental health comorbidities. Following the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) alert prompting a black box warning regarding the association between suicidality and antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), several studies were conducted, the results of which have been ambiguous, with some demonstrating a positive association between suicidality and AEDs, while others did not. This systematic review of literature sought to study the relationship between suicidality and AEDs when used exclusively for treatment of epilepsy.
    UNASSIGNED: A comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed without time limits using a predefined search language. The search results were then subjected to a systematic screening process. Eight out of a total of 443 articles satisfying predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the review for final data extraction.
    UNASSIGNED: Three studies found a significant association between suicide-related behavior and levetiracetam use in the treatment of epilepsy. One study reported a positive association of pregabalin use in patients with epilepsy under 40 years of age and high AED load with suicidality, independent of depression. The remaining four studies reported a significant association between positive family and personal history of psychiatric comorbidities and suicidality in epilepsy.
    UNASSIGNED: Although there were several methodological limitations, this review found an association between levetiracetam use and mental health comorbidities and the occurrence of suicidality in epilepsy. Larger prospective, randomized studies that overcome the limitations of current studies are required to provide definitive evidence on the occurrence of suicidality in patients with epilepsy and AED use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:难治性癫痫(IE)仍然是神经病学的主要关注点,和现有的疗法不能充分控制症状。中草药(CHM)已被广泛用作IE的抗癫痫药(AEDs)的辅助药物。然而,由于以前的研究报告的矛盾发现,目前尚不确定目前的证据是否足以证明其使用。这项荟萃分析的目的是系统评估CHM和AED联合治疗IE的疗效。方法:从开始到2021年9月,Medline,奥维德,Embase,科克伦图书馆,中国生物医学数据库,中国国家知识基础设施,VIP数据库,并对万方数据库进行了检索。仅包括评估CHM和AED组合对IE的疗效的随机对照试验(RCT)。我们将每月癫痫发作频率定义为主要结果。次要结果包括脑电图(EEG)异常率,癫痫发作持续时间,生活质量(QoL),和不良事件(AE)。结果:纳入20项研究,1,830例患者。大多数试验的方法学质量较差。荟萃分析表明,CHM和AEDs的组合比单独的AEDs更有效地减少每月发作频率[MD=-1.26%,95%CI(-1.62,-0.91);p<0.00001],脑电图异常率[RR=0.66%,95%CI(0.53,0.82);p=0.0002],并提高QoL[MD=6.96%,95%CI(3.44,10.49);p=0.0001]。两组之间的癫痫发作持续时间没有显着差异。此外,CHM和AED的组合显着降低了AE[RR=0.45%,95%CI(0.32,0.64);p<0.00001]。结论:CHM和AEDs的联合治疗可以通过减少IE患者每月的发作频率和EEG异常率来改善癫痫发作控制,并降低不良事件的风险。然而,由于纳入试验的偏倚风险较高或不确定,因此必须谨慎解释这些发现.为在IE中使用CHM和AED提供更有力的证据,未来将迫切需要高质量的RCT。
    Background: Intractable epilepsy (IE) is still a major concern in neurology, and existing therapies do not adequately control symptoms. Chinese Herbal Medicine (CHM) has been widely used as an adjunct to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) for IE. However, because of the contradictory findings reported in previous studies, it is uncertain if the present evidence is robust enough to warrant its usage. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to systematically evaluate the efficacy of the combination of CHM and AEDs for IE. Methods: From inception to September 2021, Medline, Ovid, Embase, Cochrane Library, Chinese Biomedical Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP Database, and Wanfang Database were searched. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the efficacy of the combination of CHM and AEDs for IE were included. We defined monthly seizure frequency as the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes included the abnormal rate of electroencephalogram (EEG), seizure duration, quality of life (QoL), and adverse events (AEs). Results: Twenty studies with 1,830 patients were enrolled. Most trials had poor methodological quality. The meta-analysis showed that the combination of CHM and AEDs was more efficient than AEDs alone in reducing monthly seizure frequency [MD = -1.26%, 95% CI (-1.62, -0.91); p < 0.00001], the abnormal rate of EEG [RR = 0.66%, 95% CI (0.53, 0.82); p = 0.0002], and improving the QoL [MD = 6.96%, 95% CI (3.44, 10.49); p = 0.0001]. There was no significant difference in seizure duration between groups. Moreover, the combination of CHM and AEDs significantly reduced the AEs [RR = 0.45%, 95% CI (0.32, 0.64); p < 0.00001]. Conclusion: The combination of CHM and AEDs could improve seizure control by reducing monthly seizure frequency and abnormal rate of EEG with a decreased risk of adverse events in patients with IE. However, these findings must be interpreted carefully due to the high or uncertain risk of bias in the included trials. To provide stronger evidence for the use of CHM combined with AEDs in IE, high-quality RCTs will be urgently warranted in the future.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:抗癫痫药物(ASM)是癫痫的主要治疗方法。在临床实践中,评估ASM疗效的方法(预测癫痫发作自由或癫痫发作减少),在药物治疗生命周期的任何阶段,是有限的。本范围审查确定和评估预后脑电图(EEG)生物标志物和使用EEG特征的预后模型,与ASM启动后的癫痫发作结果相关,剂量调整或退出。我们还旨在总结识别和描述这些生物标志物和模型的人群和背景。以了解它们如何用于临床实践。
    方法:在2021年1月至2022年10月之间,四个数据库,系统检索了ASM研究的参考文献和引文,这些研究使用脑电图特征和癫痫发作结局来调查发作间脑电图或预后模型的变化.使用改良的预后研究质量标准评估研究偏倚。结果被合成为定性综述。
    结果:确定了875项研究,93人包括在内。鉴定的生物标志物被分类为定性的(通过波形态视觉鉴定)或定量的。定性生物标志物包括识别心律失常,中心颞峰,发作间癫痫样放电(IED),将EEG分类为正常/异常/癫痫样,和光阵发性反应.定量生物标志物是应用于IED的统计学,高频活动,频带功率,电流源密度估计,EEG通道之间的成对统计相互依存,和复杂性的度量。使用EEG特征的预后模型是Cox比例风险模型和机器学习模型。有希望的是,一些定量脑电图生物标志物可用于评估ASM疗效,但需要进一步的研究。没有足够的证据得出结论,任何特定的生物标志物都可以用于特定的人群或背景。预测ASM疗效。
    结论:我们确定了一组潜在的预后脑电图生物标志物,可以与预后模型相结合来评估ASM疗效。然而,需要解决许多混杂因素,以便转化为临床实践。
    Antiseizure medication (ASM) is the primary treatment for epilepsy. In clinical practice, methods to assess ASM efficacy (predict seizure freedom or seizure reduction), during any phase of the drug treatment lifecycle, are limited. This scoping review identifies and appraises prognostic electroencephalographic (EEG) biomarkers and prognostic models that use EEG features, which are associated with seizure outcomes following ASM initiation, dose adjustment, or withdrawal. We also aim to summarize the population and context in which these biomarkers and models were identified and described, to understand how they could be used in clinical practice. Between January 2021 and October 2022, four databases, references, and citations were systematically searched for ASM studies investigating changes to interictal EEG or prognostic models using EEG features and seizure outcomes. Study bias was appraised using modified Quality in Prognosis Studies criteria. Results were synthesized into a qualitative review. Of 875 studies identified, 93 were included. Biomarkers identified were classed as qualitative (visually identified by wave morphology) or quantitative. Qualitative biomarkers include identifying hypsarrhythmia, centrotemporal spikes, interictal epileptiform discharges (IED), classifying the EEG as normal/abnormal/epileptiform, and photoparoxysmal response. Quantitative biomarkers were statistics applied to IED, high-frequency activity, frequency band power, current source density estimates, pairwise statistical interdependence between EEG channels, and measures of complexity. Prognostic models using EEG features were Cox proportional hazards models and machine learning models. There is promise that some quantitative EEG biomarkers could be used to assess ASM efficacy, but further research is required. There is insufficient evidence to conclude any specific biomarker can be used for a particular population or context to prognosticate ASM efficacy. We identified a potential battery of prognostic EEG biomarkers, which could be combined with prognostic models to assess ASM efficacy. However, many confounders need to be addressed for translation into clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号