antidepressants

抗抑郁药
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:世界卫生组织报告说,抑郁症影响全球超过2.8亿人。与男性相比,女性患抑郁症的可能性约为50%。怀孕期间的抑郁会导致母亲和胎儿的健康恶化。我们旨在探讨女性对使用抗抑郁药的看法和态度,并确定影响抗抑郁药使用决策的因素。
    方法:横断面调查,采用方便的抽样方法,是在利雅得的大学校园里进行的,沙特阿拉伯。这项调查是由研究人员开发的,并由卫生从业人员验证。答案是使用5分李克特量表报告的。将回答汇总以给出每个回答者的总分。得分高于或等于总分75%的受访者被认为是积极的看法或有利的态度。二元logistic回归分析用于确定影响参与者对服用抗抑郁药的感知和态度的因素。
    结果:共调查了991名受试者。大多数妇女对怀孕期间使用抗抑郁药有负面看法和有利态度,达到64%。而具有积极看法和良好态度的女性约占研究对象的20%。参与者报告说,社会耻辱,宗教信仰,对成瘾的恐惧极大地影响了他们对抗抑郁药使用的态度。
    结论:这项研究探讨了女性对抑郁症和抗抑郁药使用的看法,揭示了很大一部分沙特女性有负面看法。该研究强调需要量身定制的意识计划,以促进有关沙特女性抗抑郁药使用的知情决策。
    BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization reports that depression affects more than 280 million people globally. Women are approximately 50% more likely to experience depression compared to men. Depression during pregnancy leads to deterioration of the mother\'s and the fetus\'s health. We aim to explore women\'s perceptions and attitudes toward using antidepressants and to identify the factors that influence decision-making regarding antidepressant use.
    METHODS: A cross-sectional survey, employing a convenience sampling method, was conducted on a university campus in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The survey was developed by the investigators and validated by health practitioners. Answers were reported using a 5-point Likert scale. The responses were summed up to give a total score for each respondent. Respondents who scored above or equal 75% of the total score was considered positive perception or favorable attitude. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors influencing participants\' perception and attitude toward taking antidepressants.
    RESULTS: A total of 991 subjects were surveyed. The majority of women had negative perceptions and favorable attitudes towards using antidepressants during pregnancy reaching 64%. While women with positive perceptions and favorable attitudes represented about 20% of the study subjects. Participants reported that social stigma, religious beliefs, and fear of addiction significantly influenced their attitudes toward antidepressant use.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study explores women\'s perceptions of depression and antidepressant use, revealing that a significant proportion of Saudi women have a negative perception. The research emphasizes the need for tailored awareness programs to promote informed decision-making regarding antidepressant usage among Saudi women.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究确定了北爱尔兰(NI)老年人从2010年到2018年的抗抑郁药处方和随后的住院模式。
    参与者包括2010年1月1日所有全科医生(GP)注册的55岁及以上的成年人(n=386,119)。行政数据链接包括人口统计信息;来自NI增强处方数据库(EPD)的抗抑郁药处方数据;和住院患者。重复措施潜在类别分析(RMLCA)确定抗抑郁药处方的模式(从2010年到2018年)。
    RMLCA确定了四个潜在类别:减少抗抑郁药处方(5.9%);增加抗抑郁药处方(8.0%);无抗抑郁药处方(68.7%);和长期抗抑郁药处方(17.5%)。与无抗抑郁药处方类相比,其余班级的人更有可能是女性和年轻人,生活在农村地区或贫困地区的可能性较小。与无抗抑郁药处方相比,抗抑郁药处方增加的人在2019年和2020年住院的可能性分别增加了60%和52%,2019年和2020年,他们的录取率分别高出11%和8%。同样,长期处方的人在2019年和2020年住院的可能性分别增加了70%和67%,2019年和2020年,他们的录取率分别高出14%和9%。
    研究结果表明,约26%的NI住院患者受到持续或增加抗抑郁药处方的影响。因为他们住院的可能性增加,这些人可能受益于心理社会支持和精神药理学治疗的社会处方替代方案。
    UNASSIGNED: This study identifies patterns of antidepressant prescribing and subsequent hospital admissions from 2010 to 2018 amongst older adults in Northern Ireland (NI).
    UNASSIGNED: Participants comprised all General Practitioner (GP)-registered adults aged fifty-five years and above on 01/01/2010 (n = 386,119). Administrative data linkage included demographic information; antidepressant prescribing data from the NI Enhanced Prescribing Database (EPD); and hospital patient admissions. Repeated measures latent class analysis (RMLCA) identified patterns of antidepressant prescribing (from 2010 to 2018).
    UNASSIGNED: RMLCA identified four latent classes: decreasing antidepressant prescribing (5.9%); increasing antidepressant prescribing (8.0%); no-antidepressant prescribing (68.7%); and long-term antidepressant prescribing (17.5%). Compared with those in no-antidepressant prescribing class, persons in the remaining classes were more likely to be female and younger, and less likely to live in either rural areas or less-deprived areas. Compared with no-antidepressant prescribing, those with increasing antidepressant prescribing were 60% and 52% more likely to be admitted to hospital in 2019 and 2020, respectively, and their admission rate per year was 11% and 8% higher in 2019 and 2020, respectively. Similarly, those with long-term prescriptions were 70% and 67% more likely to be admitted to hospital in 2019 and 2020, respectively, and their admission rate per year was 14% and 9% higher in 2019 and 2020, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: Findings show that approximately 26% of the NI hospital admissions population were impacted by sustained or increasing antidepressant prescribing. Because of their increased likelihood of hospitalization, these individuals may benefit from psychosocial support and social prescribing alternatives to psychopharmacological treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:5-羟色胺4受体(5-HT4R)是治疗抑郁症的有希望的靶标。高选择性5-HT4R激动剂,比如普鲁卡必利,在临床前模型中具有抗抑郁药和促认知作用,但其临床效果尚未确定。
    目的:确定普卢卡必利(一种5-HT4R激动剂和经许可的便秘治疗)是否与无精神病史的个体抑郁症发病率降低相关,与对中枢神经系统无影响的抗便秘剂相比。
    方法:使用匿名的常规数据从美国大型电子健康记录网络收集,我们进行了一项模拟的目标试验,比较了1年以上未诊断出重大精神疾病的个体的抑郁症发病率,与两种通过不同机制起作用的替代抗便秘药(利那洛肽和鲁比前列酮)相比,谁开始了普鲁卡洛必利的治疗。队列与121个协变量匹配,捕获社会人口统计学因素,和历史和/或并发合并症和药物。主要结果是在索引日期的1年内首次诊断出重度抑郁症(ICD-10代码F32)。测试了结果对模型和种群规格变化的鲁棒性。次要结果包括其他六种神经精神疾病的首次诊断。
    结果:与利那洛肽(风险比0.87,95%CI0.76-0.99;P=0.038;每个匹配队列中n=8572)和鲁比前列酮(风险比0.79,95%CI0.69-0.91;P<0.001;n=8281)相比,使用普卢卡洛必利治疗与次年抑郁症的发生率显著降低相关。还观察到所有情绪障碍和精神病的风险显着降低。稳健性分析的结果相似。
    结论:这些发现支持临床前数据,并提示5-HT4R激动剂作为新型药物在预防重度抑郁症中的作用。这些发现应该刺激随机对照试验,以确认这些药物是否可以在临床环境中作为新型抗抑郁药。
    BACKGROUND: The serotonin 4 receptor (5-HT4R) is a promising target for the treatment of depression. Highly selective 5-HT4R agonists, such as prucalopride, have antidepressant-like and procognitive effects in preclinical models, but their clinical effects are not yet established.
    OBJECTIVE: To determine whether prucalopride (a 5-HT4R agonist and licensed treatment for constipation) is associated with reduced incidence of depression in individuals with no past history of mental illness, compared with anti-constipation agents with no effect on the central nervous system.
    METHODS: Using anonymised routinely collected data from a large-scale USA electronic health records network, we conducted an emulated target trial comparing depression incidence over 1 year in individuals without prior diagnoses of major mental illness, who initiated treatment with prucalopride versus two alternative anti-constipation agents that act by different mechanisms (linaclotide and lubiprostone). Cohorts were matched for 121 covariates capturing sociodemographic factors, and historical and/or concurrent comorbidities and medications. The primary outcome was a first diagnosis of major depressive disorder (ICD-10 code F32) within 1 year of the index date. Robustness of the results to changes in model and population specification was tested. Secondary outcomes included a first diagnosis of six other neuropsychiatric disorders.
    RESULTS: Treatment with prucalopride was associated with significantly lower incidence of depression in the following year compared with linaclotide (hazard ratio 0.87, 95% CI 0.76-0.99; P = 0.038; n = 8572 in each matched cohort) and lubiprostone (hazard ratio 0.79, 95% CI 0.69-0.91; P < 0.001; n = 8281). Significantly lower risks of all mood disorders and psychosis were also observed. Results were similar across robustness analyses.
    CONCLUSIONS: These findings support preclinical data and suggest a role for 5-HT4R agonists as novel agents in the prevention of major depression. These findings should stimulate randomised controlled trials to confirm if these agents can serve as a novel class of antidepressant within a clinical setting.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    治疗性性功能障碍(TESD)是临床试验中抗抑郁药物的常见副作用。有限的文献探讨了常规使用亚利桑那性经验量表(ASEX)在临床实践中识别TESD的作用。因此,我们完成了一项回顾性研究,其主要目标是在2020年6月至2022年3月期间,在接受精神科临床药师门诊治疗的成年患者中,了解与抗抑郁药使用相关的性功能障碍发生率.
    将ASEX之前的调查(2020年6月至2021年6月)与ASEX之后的调查(2021年7月至2022年3月)进行了比较。
    实施ASEX量表后,性功能障碍的识别显着增加(ASEX量表前的10%与ASEX量表满足性功能障碍标准的59%)。大约70%的患者在后ASEX组分享他们不会报告症状,除非直接询问。
    总而言之,在一家门诊精神病诊所进行的有效调查(ASEX)可改善与抗抑郁药相关的性功能障碍的识别.在药物随访中使用跨学科护理团队可以帮助确定患者处方临床医生就诊之间的耐受性问题。
    UNASSIGNED: Treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction (TESD) is a commonly reported side effect of antidepressant medications in clinical trials. Limited literature exists exploring the role of routine use of the Arizona Sexual Experience Scale (ASEX) in identification of TESD in clinical practice. Therefore, we completed a retrospective study with the primary goal of capturing the rates of sexual dysfunction associated with antidepressant use among adult patients at an outpatient encounter with a psychiatric clinical pharmacist between June 2020 and March 2022.
    UNASSIGNED: Rates of identification of sexual dysfunction were compared pre-ASEX survey (June 2020 to June 2021) to post-ASEX survey (July 2021 to March 2022).
    UNASSIGNED: There was a significant increase in the identification of sexual dysfunction following implementation of the ASEX scale (10% in the pre-ASEX group versus 59% meeting sexual dysfunction criteria with the ASEX scale). Approximately 70% of patients in the post-ASEX group shared they would not have reported symptoms unless directly asked.
    UNASSIGNED: In conclusion, a validated survey (ASEX) in an ambulatory psychiatry clinic improves identification of sexual dysfunction associated with antidepressants. Use of interdisciplinary care teams in the setting of medication follow-up can assist with identifying tolerability concerns between visits with patients\' prescribing clinicians.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    可用数据显示了时间类型之间的关联,昼夜节律,睡眠质量和纤维肌痛(FM)表现。然而,尚无研究探讨时间生物学变量与药物治疗有效性之间的联系.我们的目的是评估时间型,昼夜节律,FM的睡眠-觉醒周期和睡眠质量及其与5-羟色胺和去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRI)治疗反应的联系。60名FM患者:30名对SNRI(FMT[+])有反应,30名对SNRI无反应(FMT[-])和30名健康对照参加。受试者由医生和问卷工具进行评估:晨显综合量表,神经精神病学评估的生物节律访谈,睡眠-觉醒模式评估问卷,匹兹堡睡眠质量指数和纤维肌痛影响问卷。使用ANOVA分析和简单逻辑回归来检查时间变量与对SNRI的反应之间的关系。FMT[-]vs.FMT[+]呈现较低的上午影响(11.50[95CI9.96-13.04]与14.00[95CI12.42-15.57];p=0.04),随时唤醒能力(2.27[95CI1.4-3.13]vs.4.03[95CI2.99-5.08];p=0.013)总体较差(11.40[95CI9.92-12.88]与7.97[95CI6.75-9.19];p=0.002)和主观(1.70[95CI1.30-2.01]与1.17[95CI0.94-1.39];p=0.008)睡眠质量,更高的昼夜节律中断(55.47[95CI52.32-58.62]vs.44.97[95CI41.31-48.62];p<0.001),睡眠障碍(1.63[95CI1.38-1.68]vs.1.30[95CI1.1-1.5];p=0.04),安眠药使用(1.80[95CI1.27-2.32]vs.0.70[95CI0.28-1.12];p=0.003)。晨显水平(AIC=82.91,OR=0.93,p=0.05),晨起影响(AIC=81.901,OR=0.86,p=0.03)昼夜节律异常(AIC=69.566,OR=1.14,p<0.001),随时唤醒能力(AIC=80.307,OR=0.76,p=0.015),总体睡眠质量(AIC=74.665,OR=1.31,p=0.002)主观睡眠质量(AIC=79.353,OR=2.832,p=0.01)和干扰(AIC=82.669,OR=2.54,p=0.043),睡眠药物使用(AIC=77.017,OR=1.9,p=0.003)和日间功能障碍(AIC=82.908,OR=1.971,p=0.049)是SNRI无应答的预测因子.时间生物学变量在FMT[+]和FMT[-]之间变化,并且是对SNRI无反应的预测因子。
    Available data shows associations between chronotype, circadian rhythms, sleep quality and fibromyalgia (FM) presentation. However, no studies have explored links between the chronobiological variables and effectiveness of pharmacotherapy. We aimed to assess the chronotypes, circadian rhythms, sleep-wake cycle and sleep quality in FM and their links to treatment response to serotonin and noradrenalin reuptake inhibitors (SNRI). 60 FM patients: 30 responsive to SNRI (FM T[+]), 30 non-responsive to SNRI (FM T[-]) and 30 healthy controls participated. Subjects were assessed by physician and with questionnaire tools: Composite Scale of Morningness, Biological Rhythms Interview of Assessment in Neuropsychiatry, Sleep-Wake Pattern Assessment Questionnaire, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire. ANOVA analysis and simple logistic regressions were used to examine the relationships between chronological variables and response to SNRI. FM T[-] vs. FM T[+] presented lower morning affect (11.50[95%CI 9.96-13.04] vs. 14.00[95%CI 12.42-15.57];p=0.04), anytime wakeability (2.27[95%CI 1.4-3.13] vs. 4.03[95%CI 2.99-5.08];p=0.013) worse overall (11.40[95%CI 9.92-12.88] vs. 7.97[95%CI 6.75-9.19];p=0.002) and subjective (1.70[95%CI 1.30-2.01] vs. 1.17[95%CI 0.94-1.39];p=0.008) sleep quality, higher circadian rhythm disruptions (55.47[95%CI 52.32-58.62] vs. 44.97[95%CI 41.31-48.62];p<0.001), sleep disturbances (1.63[95%CI 1.38-1.68] vs. 1.30[95%CI 1.1-1.5];p=0.04), sleeping-medication use (1.80[95%CI 1.27-2.32] vs. 0.70[95%CI 0.28-1.12];p=0.003). Levels of morningness (AIC=82.91,OR=0.93,p=0.05), morning affect (AIC=81.901,OR=0.86,p=0.03) diurnal dysrhythmia (AIC=69.566,OR=1.14,p<0.001), anytime wakeability (AIC=80.307,OR=0.76,p=0.015), overall sleep quality (AIC=74.665, OR=1.31,p=0.002) subjective sleep quality (AIC=79.353, OR=2.832,p=0.01) and disturbances (AIC=82.669,OR=2.54,p=0.043), sleep medication use (AIC=77.017, OR=1.9,p=0.003) and daytime disfunction (AIC=82.908, OR=1.971,p=0.049) were predictors of non-response to SNRI. Chronobiological variables vary between FM T[+] and FM T[-] and are predictors of non-response to SNRI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    :在新加坡的现实生活中,研究在患有重度抑郁症(MDD)和反应不足的亚洲成年人中,作为抗抑郁药治疗(ADT)的辅助治疗的有效性和安全性。
    :这是一个前景,对MDD患者进行为期3个月的观察性研究,这些患者在其现有ADT中添加了布立哌唑.该研究于2020年9月至2021年10月在新加坡的两个地点进行。共同主要终点是患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)和临床总体印象-严重程度(CGI-S)。其他终点包括临床总体印象改善(CGI-I),Sheehan残疾量表(SDS),广义焦虑症7项量表(GAD-7),和安全。
    :20名患者入组,16名患者完成研究。PHQ-9,CGI-S,SDS,第12周时与基线相比的GAD-7评分,平均差分别为-4.8、-1.3、-8.5和-6.2。CGI-I评分从基线改善,在第12周时平均评分为2.3。根据第12周的PHQ-9评分,三分之一的人获得了缓解,25%的人获得了缓解。使用CGI-S评分获得了类似的结果(两者均为38%)。不良事件(AE)和治疗相关AE的发生率分别为55%(11/20)和50%(10/20),分别。没有死亡或严重的AE。两名患者在研究期间退出了brexiprazole。
    :在新加坡的现实世界中,观察到的辅助布立哌唑在患有MDD的亚洲成年人中的作用和安全性与临床试验中的作用和安全性一致。
    UNASSIGNED: : To investigate the effectiveness and safety of brexpiprazole as an adjunctive treatment to antidepressant therapy (ADT) in Asian adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) and inadequate response in a real-life clinical setting in Singapore.
    UNASSIGNED: : This was a prospective, observational 3-month study of patients with MDD who had brexpiprazole added to their existing ADT. The study was conducted at two sites in Singapore between September 2020 and October 2021. The co-primary endpoints were Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S). Other endpoints included Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I), Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7), and safety.
    UNASSIGNED: : Twenty patients were enrolled and 16 completed the study. There were improvements in PHQ-9, CGI-S, SDS, and GAD-7 scores from baseline at Week 12, with a mean difference of -4.8, -1.3, -8.5, and -6.2, respectively. The CGI-I score improved from baseline with a mean score of 2.3 at Week 12. One third achieved response and 25% achieved remission based on PHQ-9 scores at Week 12. Similar results were obtained using CGI-S scores (38% for both). The incidences of adverse events (AEs) and treatment-related AEs were 55% (11/20) and 50% (10/20), respectively. There were no deaths or severe AEs. Two patients withdrew brexpiprazole during the study.
    UNASSIGNED: : The observed effects and safety of adjunctive brexpiprazole in Asian adults with MDD in the real-world setting in Singapore were consistent with those from clinical trials.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:酒精使用障碍(AUD)和抑郁症非常普遍,并且与重要的心理,生理,社会和经济后果。它们的共同出现带来了复杂的临床挑战,因为抗抑郁药物对AUD结局的影响仍然模棱两可。在这个多中心,纵向研究我们调查了AUD患者抗抑郁药物与抑郁症状变化和饮酒之间的关系.
    方法:我们分析了2015年至2019年期间参加12周住院治疗计划的153名解毒AUD患者的数据。在调解分析中,采用自举方法和准贝叶斯框架,我们估计了总数,直接,和抗抑郁药对戒断天数百分比的介导作用,以评估抑郁症状变化作为介导因素的作用。
    结果:调解分析揭示了双重影响途径模型,抗抑郁药对禁欲具有负的直接作用(p=0.004)和正的间接作用,通过减少抑郁症状介导(p=0.002)。
    结论:调解分析的结果表明,使用抗抑郁药治疗且抑郁症状随着时间的推移没有改善的患者表现出更多的复发,而用抗抑郁药治疗的患者,抑郁症状减轻,随着时间的推移,复发较少。因此,为了优化治疗结果,在AUD治疗期间服用抗抑郁药时,应警惕监测抑郁症状。
    BACKGROUND: Alcohol use disorder (AUD) and depression are highly prevalent and tied to significant psychological, physiological, social and economic consequences. Their co-occurrence presents a complex clinical challenge, as the impact of antidepressant medication on AUD outcomes remains equivocal. In this multicenter, longitudinal study we investigated the relationship between antidepressant medication and changes in depression symptoms and alcohol use in AUD patients.
    METHODS: We analyzed data from 153 detoxified AUD patients who attended a 12-week residential treatment program between 2015 and 2019. Within a mediation analysis, adopting a bootstrapping approach and a quasi-Bayesian framework, we estimated the total, direct, and mediated effects of antidepressants on the percentage of days abstinent to assess the role of changes in depression symptoms as a mediating factor.
    RESULTS: The mediation analysis revealed a dual impact pathway model with a negative direct effect of antidepressants on abstinence (p = 0.004) and a positive indirect effect, mediated through the reduction of depression symptoms (p = 0.002).
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the mediation analysis show that patients treated with antidepressants and whose depression symptoms do not improve over time show more relapses, while patients treated with antidepressants who achieve a reduction in depression symptoms show fewer relapses over time. Thus, to optimize treatment outcome, depression symptoms should be vigilantly monitored when antidepressants are prescribed during AUD treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    作者试图评估亲社会,氯胺酮的entactogen效应。
    在随机的治疗抵抗抑郁症的参与者样本中评估了来自社交场合的快乐,双盲,安慰剂对照研究,使用氯胺酮(0.5mg/kg静脉注射)或安慰剂治疗后1周内五个时间点的Snaith-Hamilton快乐量表(SHAPS)的四项。主要终点是输液后自我报告的关于四个SHAPS项目的快乐,包括帮助他人的项目,氯胺酮和安慰剂组之间。在一个啮齿动物实验中,使用伤害厌恶任务评估氯胺酮对大鼠帮助行为的影响.主要终点是杠杆反应率相对于基线降低,这表明大鼠愿意放弃获得蔗糖来帮助保护它们的笼子伴侣免受电击。
    相对于安慰剂,氯胺酮增加了与家人或亲密朋友在一起的快乐感的评级,看到别人的笑脸,帮助别人,并受到赞扬,治疗后1周。在啮齿动物实验中,在厌恶伤害任务中,在治疗后6天,氯胺酮治疗的大鼠相对于基线的反应率保持在较低的程度,高于在媒介物治疗的大鼠中观察到的程度,并且总体电击较少.
    在患有难治性抑郁症的患者中,氯胺酮治疗与社交场合带来的快乐增加有关,比如从帮助别人中感到快乐。氯胺酮治疗的大鼠更有可能保护它们的笼子伴侣免受伤害,以获得蔗糖为代价。这些发现表明氯胺酮具有内吞原效应。
    UNASSIGNED: The authors sought to assess the prosocial, entactogen effects of ketamine.
    UNASSIGNED: Pleasure from social situations was assessed in a sample of participants with treatment-resistant depression from randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies, using four items of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) at five time points over 1 week following treatment with ketamine (0.5 mg/kg intravenously) or placebo. The primary endpoint was postinfusion self-reported pleasure on the four SHAPS items pertaining to social situations, including the item on helping others, between the ketamine and placebo groups. In a rodent experiment, the impact of ketamine on helping behavior in rats was assessed using the harm aversion task. The primary endpoint was a reduction in lever response rate relative to baseline, which indicated the willingness of rats to forgo obtaining sucrose to help protect their cage mate from electric shock.
    UNASSIGNED: Relative to placebo, ketamine increased ratings of feeling pleasure from being with family or close friends, seeing other people\'s smiling faces, helping others, and receiving praise, for 1 week following treatment. In the rodent experiment, during the harm aversion task, ketamine-treated rats maintained lower response rates relative to baseline to a greater extent than what was observed in vehicle-treated rats for 6 days posttreatment and delivered fewer shocks overall.
    UNASSIGNED: In patients with treatment-resistant depression, ketamine treatment was associated with increased pleasure from social situations, such as feeling pleasure from helping others. Ketamine-treated rats were more likely to protect their cage mate from harm, at the cost of obtaining sucrose. These findings suggest that ketamine has entactogen effects.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    抗抑郁药通常用于治疗双相抑郁,但可能会增加躁狂症的风险。随机对照试验的证据,然而,受治疗持续时间短的限制,几乎没有证据表明抗抑郁药引起的躁狂症的长期风险。作者进行了一项目标试验仿真,以比较在1年内接受或未接受抗抑郁药治疗的双相抑郁个体中躁狂症的风险。
    作者使用来自全国丹麦健康登记册的观察数据模拟了一项目标试验。该研究包括979名最近从精神科病房出院的双相抑郁症患者。其中,358人接受抗抑郁治疗,621没有。确定了第二年躁狂症和双相抑郁的发生,采用Cox比例风险回归分析抗抑郁药的意向治疗效果,并对基线协变量进行校正,以模拟随机开放标签治疗分配.
    完全调整的分析显示,在整个样本中,抗抑郁药治疗与躁狂症风险之间没有统计学上的显着关联(危险率比=1.08,95%CI=0.72-1.61),在伴随用情绪稳定剂治疗的子样本中(危险率比=1.16,95%CI=0.63-2.13),并且在未使用情绪稳定剂治疗的子样本中(危险率比=1.16,95%CI=0.65-2.07)。次要分析显示,抗抑郁药治疗与双相抑郁复发之间没有统计学上的显着关联。
    这些研究结果表明,抗抑郁药引起的躁狂症的风险可以忽略不计,需要进一步研究以优化双相抑郁症患者的治疗策略。
    UNASSIGNED: Antidepressants are commonly used to treat bipolar depression but may increase the risk of mania. The evidence from randomized controlled trials, however, is limited by short treatment durations, providing little evidence for the long-term risk of antidepressant-induced mania. The authors performed a target trial emulation to compare the risk of mania among individuals with bipolar depression treated or not treated with antidepressants over a 1-year period.
    UNASSIGNED: The authors emulated a target trial using observational data from nationwide Danish health registers. The study included 979 individuals with bipolar depression recently discharged from a psychiatric ward. Of these, 358 individuals received antidepressant treatment, and 621 did not. The occurrence of mania and bipolar depression over the following year was ascertained, and the intention-to-treat effect of antidepressants was analyzed by using Cox proportional hazards regression with adjustment for baseline covariates to emulate randomized open-label treatment allocation.
    UNASSIGNED: The fully adjusted analyses revealed no statistically significant associations between treatment with an antidepressant and the risk of mania in the full sample (hazard rate ratio=1.08, 95% CI=0.72-1.61), in the subsample concomitantly treated with a mood-stabilizing agent (hazard rate ratio=1.16, 95% CI=0.63-2.13), and in the subsample not treated with a mood-stabilizing agent (hazard rate ratio=1.16, 95% CI=0.65-2.07). Secondary analyses revealed no statistically significant association between treatment with an antidepressant and bipolar depression recurrence.
    UNASSIGNED: These findings suggest that the risk of antidepressant-induced mania is negligible and call for further studies to optimize treatment strategies for individuals with bipolar depression.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    已知临床痴呆评定量表箱和(CDRSOB)评分高度指示认知功能状态,并且经常用于临床和研究目的。
    我们的目的是确定CDRSOB在评估药物类别与进展为轻度认知障碍(MCI)和痴呆风险的相关性时是否与临床诊断一致。
    我们对纵向NACC数据采用加权Cox回归分析,确定与疾病进展风险相关的药物类别,以临床诊断和CDRSOB为结果。
    阿司匹林(抗血小板/非甾体抗炎药),血管紧张素II抑制剂(抗高血压药),帕金森病药物治疗与MCI/痴呆进展风险降低显著相关,阿尔茨海默病药物治疗与MCI至痴呆进展风险增加相关,临床诊断和CDRSOB均为结局.然而,某些药物类别/子类别,比如抗焦虑药,抗肾上腺素药,钙(Ca2+)通道阻滞剂,利尿剂(抗高血压药)与疾病进展风险降低有关,和SSRIs(抗抑郁药)仅与CDRSOB患者的进展风险增加相关。此外,二甲双胍(抗糖尿病药物)与MCI至痴呆的进展风险降低相关,仅临床诊断为结局.
    尽管两种诊断结果的作用幅度和方向基本相似,我们证明诊断措施的选择会影响归因于药物类别的风险/保护的重要性,从而影响结果的结论.研究界必须就最准确的诊断结果达成共识,以识别风险并提高可重复性。
    UNASSIGNED: The Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes (CDRSOB) score is known to be highly indicative of cognitive-functional status and is regularly employed for clinical and research purposes.
    UNASSIGNED: Our aim is to determine whether CDRSOB is consistent with clinical diagnosis in evaluating drug class associations with risk of progression to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia.
    UNASSIGNED: We employed weighted Cox regression analysis on longitudinal NACC data, to identify drug classes associated with disease progression risk, using clinical diagnosis and CDRSOB as the outcome.
    UNASSIGNED: Aspirin (antiplatelet/NSAID), angiotensin II inhibitors (antihypertensive), and Parkinson\'s disease medications were significantly associated with reduced risk of progression to MCI/dementia and Alzheimer\'s disease medications were associated with increased MCI-to-Dementia progression risk with both clinical diagnosis and CDRSOB as the outcome. However, certain drug classes/subcategories, like anxiolytics, antiadrenergics, calcium (Ca2+) channel blockers, and diuretics (antihypertensives) were associated with reduced risk of disease progression, and SSRIs (antidepressant) were associated with increased progression risk only with CDRSOB. Additionally, metformin (antidiabetic medication) was associated with reduced MCI-to-Dementia progression risk only with clinical diagnosis as the outcome.
    UNASSIGNED: Although the magnitude and direction of the effect were primarily similar for both diagnostic outcomes, we demonstrate that choice of diagnostic measure can influence the significance of risk/protection attributed to drug classes and consequently the conclusion of findings. A consensus must be reached within the research community with respect to the most accurate diagnostic outcome to identify risk and improve reproducibility.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号