antidepressants

抗抑郁药
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    抑郁症是最常见的精神疾病之一,这给患者带来了巨大的社会经济负担,看护者,和公共卫生系统。使用经典抗抑郁药(例如三环抗抑郁药和选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂)治疗,主要影响单胺能系统有几个局限性,在相对较大比例的抑郁症患者中,例如延迟起效和中度疗效。此外,抑郁症是高度异质性的,和它的不同亚型,包括产后抑郁症,涉及不同的神经生物学,保证对药物治疗采取不同的方法。鉴于这些缺点,对疗效更优、起效更快的新型抗抑郁药的需求是完全合理的.近年来,速效抗抑郁药的开发和市场引入加速。这些新的抗抑郁药中的一些通过GABA能系统起作用。在这次审查中,我们讨论这个发现,功效,以及经典抗抑郁药治疗的局限性。我们提供了GABA能神经传递的详细讨论,特别关注GABAA受体,以及GABA能药物(特别是作用于GABAA受体的神经类固醇)的情绪增强作用的可能解释,最终,我们提出了属于该家族的最有希望的分子,这些分子目前已用于临床实践或处于临床开发的后期阶段。
    Depression is among the most common psychiatric illnesses, which imposes a major socioeconomic burden on patients, caregivers, and the public health system. Treatment with classical antidepressants (e.g. tricyclic antidepressants and selective serotonine reuptake inhibitors), which primarily affect monoaminergic systems has several limitations, such as delayed onset of action and moderate efficacy in a relatively large proportion of depressed patients. Furthermore, depression is highly heterogeneus, and its different subtypes, including post-partum depression, involve distinct neurobiology, warranting a differential approach to pharmacotherapy. Given these shortcomings, the need for novel antidepressants that are superior in efficacy and faster in onset of action is fully justified. The development and market introduction of rapid-acting antidepressants has accelerated in recent years. Some of these new antidepressants act through the GABAergic system. In this review, we discuss the discovery, efficacy, and limitations of treatment with classic antidepressants. We provide a detailed discussion of GABAergic neurotransmission, with a special focus on GABAA receptors, and possible explanations for the mood-enhancing effects of GABAergic medications (in particular neurosteroids acting at GABAA receptors), and ultimately, we present the most promising molecules belonging to this family which are currently used in clinical practice or are in late phases of clinical development.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性疼痛在临床实践中提出了多方面的挑战,需要对药理学干预措施进行细微差别的理解,以优化治疗结果。这篇综述概述了慢性疼痛管理中常用的各种药物,并强调了它们的安全性。尤其是自杀风险。
    这篇综述讨论了抗抑郁药的作用,抗惊厥药,GABA受体激动剂,NMDA受体拮抗剂,皮质类固醇,大麻和大麻素,双膦酸盐,降钙素,和α-2肾上腺素能受体激动剂在慢性疼痛管理中的应用。它评估他们的治疗益处,潜在的滥用,和精神上的不良影响,包括自杀的风险。每个药理学类别都根据其功效进行评估,安全概况,以及临床实践的考虑。我们使用MEDLINE数据库搜索了有关该主题的同行评审英语文献,没有时间限制。
    虽然药物干预有望缓解慢性疼痛,医疗保健提供者必须仔细权衡他们的利益与潜在风险,包括精神症状恶化和自杀风险增加的风险。个性化治疗方法,密切监测,和多学科协作对于优化疼痛管理策略同时减轻不良反应至关重要.持续的研究工作对于提高我们对这些药物干预措施的理解和完善疼痛管理实践至关重要。
    UNASSIGNED: Chronic pain presents a multifaceted challenge in clinical practice, necessitating a nuanced understanding of pharmacological interventions to optimize treatment outcomes. This review provides an outline of various pharmacological agents commonly used in chronic pain management and highlights their safety considerations, particularly regarding suicide risk.
    UNASSIGNED: This review discusses the role of antidepressants, anticonvulsants, GABA receptor agonists, NMDA receptor antagonists, corticosteroids, cannabis and cannabinoids, bisphosphonates, calcitonin, and alpha-2 adrenergic receptor agonists in chronic pain management. It assesses their therapeutic benefits, potential for misuse, and psychiatric adverse effects, including the risk of suicide. Each pharmacological class is evaluated in terms of its efficacy, safety profile, and considerations for clinical practice. We searched peer-reviewed English literature on the topic using the MEDLINE database without time restrictions.
    UNASSIGNED: While pharmacological interventions offer promise in alleviating chronic pain, healthcare providers must carefully weigh their benefits against potential risks, including the risk of exacerbating psychiatric symptoms and increasing suicide risk. Individualized treatment approaches, close monitoring, and multidisciplinary collaboration are essential for optimizing pain management strategies while mitigating adverse effects. Ongoing research efforts are crucial for advancing our understanding of these pharmacological interventions and refining pain management practices.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管哺乳期母亲的抑郁症患病率很高,人们对抗抑郁药排泄到母乳中及其对婴儿的潜在不利影响缺乏了解。这引起了人们的关注,使抑郁的哺乳期母亲更有可能避免药物治疗。临床泌乳研究是预测和证明抗抑郁药排泄到母乳中的最准确,最直接的方法。临床研究的结果可以包含在药物标签中,以帮助医生和患者在哺乳期使用抗抑郁药做出决定。然而,有有限的临床试验和研究抗抑郁药在哺乳期妇女的药代动力学,因为缺乏注册和伦理和混杂因素,造成这方面知识的缺乏。为了弥合知识上的差距,应该寻求替代方法来帮助估计母乳中的抗抑郁药浓度,用于评估抗抑郁药的安全性和转移到母乳中。我们对这些具有成本效益的产品的使用情况进行了全面审查,省时,和道德上可行的方法,用于在进行临床研究之前对抗抑郁药的安全性和转移到母乳中提供有价值的评估。
    Despite the prevalence of depression in lactating mothers, there is a lack of knowledge about the excretion of antidepressants into breast milk and its potential adverse effects on infants. This creates concern, making depressed lactating mothers more likely to avoid pharmacological treatment. Clinical lactation studies are the most accurate and direct method to predict and demonstrate the excretion of antidepressants into human breast milk, and results from clinical studies can be included in drug labels to help physicians and patients make decisions on antidepressant use during lactation. However, there are limited clinical trials and studies on the pharmacokinetics of antidepressants in lactating women because of a lack of enrollment and ethical and confounding factors, creating a lack of knowledge in this area. To bridge this gap in knowledge, alternative methods should be sought to help estimate the antidepressant concentration in breast milk, which is used to assess the safety and transfer of antidepressants into breast milk. We provide a comprehensive review of the usage of these cost-effective, time-efficient, and ethically feasible methods that serve to provide a valuable estimation of the safety and transfer of antidepressants into breast milk before conducting clinical studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:纤维肌痛综合征(FMS)是一种复杂的慢性疼痛,其特征是广泛的肌肉骨骼疼痛和许多其他衰弱症状。这次审查的目的是提供一个全面的概述,基于日常临床实践,目前用于治疗FMS的药物。
    结果:FMS的治疗基于多模态方法,药物治疗是一个重要的支柱。使用的药物包括三环抗抑郁药,5-羟色胺和去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂,其他抗抑郁药,抗惊厥药,肌肉松弛剂,和镇痛药.这些药物的有效性各不相同,药物的选择通常取决于患者出现的特定症状。许多药物倾向于仅解决复杂FMS症状学的某些领域,或者对疼痛的影响有限。每种治疗方案都有潜在的副作用和风险,需要仔细考虑。将患者分为临床亚群可能是有益的,例如具有共病抑郁症的FMS,更有效的治疗。尽管复杂和挑战,药物治疗仍然是FMS管理的关键部分。这篇综述旨在指导临床医生对FMS患者进行药物治疗。
    OBJECTIVE: Fibromyalgia Syndrome (FMS) is a complex chronic pain condition characterized by widespread musculoskeletal pain and numerous other debilitating symptoms. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview, based on everyday clinical practice, of the drugs presently employed in the treatment of FMS.
    RESULTS: The treatment of FMS is based on a multimodal approach, with pharmacologic treatment being an essential pillar. The drugs used include tricyclic antidepressants, serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, other antidepressants, anticonvulsants, myorelaxants, and analgesics. The effectiveness of these medications varies, and the choice of drug often depends on the specific symptoms presented by the patient. Many drugs tend to either address only some domains of the complex FMS symptomatology or have a limited effect on pain. Each treatment option comes with potential side effects and risks that necessitate careful consideration. It may be beneficial to divide patients into clinical subpopulations, such as FMS with comorbid depression, for more effective treatment. Despite the complexities and challenges, the pharmacological treatment remains a crucial part for the management of FMS. This review aims to guide clinicians in prescribing pharmacological treatment to individuals with FMS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:单胺氧化酶抑制剂(MAOIs)被认为是治疗难治性抑郁症的三线疗法;然而,它们在临床实践中使用不足。
    目的:本研究旨在评估疗效,耐受性,与其他抗抑郁治疗相比,MAOIs治疗抑郁症的可接受性。
    方法:对随机临床试验进行系统评价和网络荟萃分析,以比较疗效。MAOIs和其他抗抑郁药治疗抑郁发作的耐受性和可接受性。
    结果:共有83个双盲,随机对照试验纳入分析,7765名参与者被分配到积极治疗,1844名参与者被分配到安慰剂。几个MAOIs,包括异卡波肼,苯乙嗪,tranylcypromineandmoclobemide,与安慰剂相比,显示出显着更高的疗效。MAOIs的耐受性和可接受性与其他抗抑郁药相当。
    结论:调查最常用的MAOIs的研究数量不成比例,如莫洛贝胺和苯乙嗪,缺乏针对抗治疗和非典型抑郁症的具体研究。
    结论:MAOIs与其他抗抑郁药治疗抑郁症的疗效相似。然而,需要更多的研究比较MAOI治疗对治疗耐药的人,非典型和双相抑郁症。
    BACKGROUND: Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) are considered third-line treatments for treatment resistant depression; however, they are underused in clinical practice.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the efficacy, tolerability, and acceptability of MAOIs for the treatment of depression in comparison with other antidepressant treatments.
    METHODS: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials was performed to compare the efficacy, tolerability and acceptability between MAOIs and other antidepressant treatments for the treatment of depressive episodes.
    RESULTS: A total of 83 double-blinded, randomised controlled trials were included in the analysis, with 7765 participants assigned to an active treatment and 1844 assigned to placebo. Several MAOIs, including isocarboxazid, phenelzine, tranylcypromine and moclobemide, showed significantly higher efficacy compared with placebo. The tolerability and acceptability of MAOIs was comparable to other antidepressants.
    CONCLUSIONS: A disproportionate number of studies investigating the most commonly used MAOIs, such as moclobemide and phenelzine, and a lack of specific studies focusing on treatment-resistant and atypical depression.
    CONCLUSIONS: MAOIs are similar in efficacy to other antidepressants for the treatment of depression. However, more studies are needed comparing MAOI treatment in people with treatment-resistant, atypical and bipolar depression.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    电惊厥性休克(ECS)和氯胺酮是抗抑郁治疗,与常规药物和心理治疗相比,治疗效果相对较快。虽然ECS和氯胺酮抗抑郁反应的确切神经生物学机制尚不清楚,两种干预措施都与神经可塑性相关.神经可塑性的恢复可能是这些干预措施抗抑郁功效的共同机制。在这次系统审查中,对抑郁症动物模型的文献进行了总结,以检查ECS和氯胺酮对分子的神经可塑性的可能作用,神经元,突触和功能水平,以及具体到什么程度这些机制是在两种干预措施之间共享。结果强调,ECS和氯胺酮后海马神经发生和脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)水平持续增加。此外,两种干预措施都对谷氨酸能神经传递产生积极影响,星形胶质细胞和神经元形态学,突触密度,血管和功能可塑性。然而,少数研究调查了ECS后的这些过程。了解快速作用抗抑郁药的共同基本机制可以有助于开发针对重度抑郁症患者的新型治疗方法。
    Electroconvulsive shocks (ECS) and ketamine are antidepressant treatments with a relatively fast onset of therapeutic effects compared to conventional medication and psychotherapy. While the exact neurobiological mechanisms underlying the antidepressant response of ECS and ketamine are unknown, both interventions are associated with neuroplasticity. Restoration of neuroplasticity may be a shared mechanism underlying the antidepressant efficacy of these interventions. In this systematic review, literature of animal models of depression is summarized to examine the possible role of neuroplasticity in ECS and ketamine on a molecular, neuronal, synaptic and functional level, and specifically to what extent these mechanisms are shared between both interventions. The results highlight that hippocampal neurogenesis and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels are consistently increased after ECS and ketamine. Moreover, both interventions positively affect glutamatergic neurotransmission, astrocyte and neuronal morphology, synaptic density, vasculature and functional plasticity. However, a small number of studies investigated these processes after ECS. Understanding the shared fundamental mechanisms of fast-acting antidepressants can contribute to the development of novel therapeutic approaches for patients with severe depression.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:抗抑郁药的使用在青少年和年轻人中呈上升趋势,人群患2型糖尿病的风险也越来越高。然而,在这些年龄组中,抗抑郁药的使用与糖尿病发病率之间的关系仍然知之甚少.
    方法:遵守PRISMA指南和Cochrane手册,我们在PubMed进行了全面的搜索,Scopus,Embase,和WebofScience至2024年2月21日,在PROSPERO上注册我们的协议(CRD42024516272)。
    结果:六项研究,来自北美的16,470至1,582,914名参与者,涵盖2010年至2023年,欧洲,亚洲,包括在内。荟萃分析显示,抗抑郁药的使用与糖尿病发病之间存在显着关联。每1,000个观察中有10个病例(p<0.01;I2=100%)。与不使用抗抑郁药或使用低剂量抗抑郁药的青少年相比,使用高剂量抗抑郁药的青少年患糖尿病的风险增加了62%(风险比=1.67;95%CI1.19-2.35;I2=87%;p<0.01)。研究的总体质量很高,纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表的平均得分为7.66。敏感性分析强调了这些发现的稳健性,除非删除特定研究,表明异质性的潜在来源。
    结论:青少年使用抗抑郁药与糖尿病发病风险显著增加有关,特别是在更高的剂量。这一发现强调了对该人群的血糖水平进行警惕监测的必要性,并需要对潜在机制和长期结果进行进一步调查。
    BACKGROUND: The use of antidepressants has been on the rise among adolescents and young adults, populations also increasingly at risk for type 2 diabetes. However, the relationship between antidepressant uses and diabetes incidence in these age groups remains poorly understood.
    METHODS: Adhering to PRISMA guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook, we conducted a comprehensive search in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science up to 21 February 2024, registering our protocol on PROSPERO (CRD42024516272).
    RESULTS: Six studies, ranging from 16, 470 to 1, 582, 914 participants and spanning 2010 to 2023 across North America, Europe, and Asia, were included. The meta-analysis revealed a significant association between antidepressant use and diabetes onset, with 10 cases per 1, 000 observations (p < 0.01; I2 = 100%). Adolescents using high doses of antidepressants showed a 62% increased risk of developing diabetes compared to non-users or those on low doses (Risk ratio = 1.67; 95% CI 1.19-2.35; I2 = 87%; p < 0.01). The overall quality of the studies was high, with an average Newcastle-Ottawa Scale score of 7.66. Sensitivity analysis highlighted the robustness of these findings, except when removing specific studies, indicating potential sources of heterogeneity.
    CONCLUSIONS: Antidepressant use in adolescents is associated with a significantly increased risk of diabetes onset, particularly at higher doses. This finding underscores the necessity for vigilant monitoring of glucose levels in this population and warrants further investigation into the underlying mechanisms and long-term outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:痴呆患者抑郁症的诊断导致疾病负担的增加。为了治疗这个病人组的抑郁症,抗抑郁药经常使用;然而,没有任何证据证明它们的治疗效果,它们的使用可能是潜在的有害的。这篇叙述性综述旨在总结有关抗抑郁药在治疗痴呆患者抑郁症中的作用的现有证据。
    方法:在PubMed中进行了搜索,摘录医学数据库(EMBASE),和Cochrane数据库用于随机对照试验和荟萃分析,其中向痴呆症患者提供抗抑郁药以解决抑郁症。确定了15项随机对照试验和7项荟萃分析。大多数精心设计的盲法安慰剂对照试验报告了抗抑郁药在治疗痴呆症患者抑郁症方面缺乏有效性。在七项分析中,两个报道了选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)的良好疗效。然而,Cochrane的两篇主要综述报道了在痴呆患者中抗抑郁药几乎没有或没有效果,副作用增加.
    结论:有确凿的证据表明抗抑郁药治疗痴呆患者抑郁症缺乏疗效。然而,进一步精心设计的随机对照试验(RCTs,)使用具有良好效度和信度的量表诊断痴呆症患者的抑郁症,足够的样本量,和详细的不利影响配置文件可能有助于确定其使用的理由。
    BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of depression in dementia patients leads to an increase in the burden of the disease. To treat depression in this patient group, antidepressants are frequently used; however, there is not any proof of their therapeutic effectiveness, and their use may be potentially harmful. This narrative review aims to summarize the existing evidence regarding the role of antidepressants in treating depression in dementia patients.
    METHODS: A search was conducted in the PubMed, Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE), and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses wherein antidepressants were given to dementia sufferers to address depression. Fifteen randomized controlled trials and seven meta-analyses were identified. Most well-designed blinded placebo-controlled trials reported a lack of effectiveness of antidepressants in treating depression in dementia patients. Among the seven metanalyses, two reported good efficacy of Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). However, two major Cochrane reviews reported little or no effectiveness and increased side effects of antidepressants in dementia patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: There is robust evidence regarding the lack of efficacy of antidepressants in treating depression in dementia patients. However, further well-designed Randomized controlled trials (RCTs,) using scales with good validity and reliability to diagnose depression in dementia patients, sufficient sample sizes, and detailed adverse effect profiles may help determine the rationale for their use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在最佳组合经颅磁刺激(TMS)和抗抑郁药以治疗重度抑郁症(MDD)患者方面存在关键的知识差距。TMS可有效治疗至少一项抗抑郁药试验失败的患者的MDD,加速方案显示治疗抗性抑郁症(TRD)的缓解速度更快。尽管临床医生通常使用TMS增加抗抑郁药,在开始或逐渐减少TMS时,停止抗抑郁药与继续抗抑郁药或给药策略方面存在知识差距.在考虑维持TMS(单独或与合适的抗抑郁药联合使用)以在TMS的索引过程后维持MDD缓解时,这些考虑因素很重要。作为填补这一知识空白的第一步,我们回顾了来自2个数据库(PubMed/Medline和EMBASE)的随机对照试验(RCTs)和开放标签试验,这些试验比较了成人MDD患者的活性TMS联合预先指定的抗抑郁药与假性TMS联合相同的抗抑郁药,这些试验以相同的方式在活动臂中进行.所有研究均在2000年1月1日至2023年12月31日之间发表。我们排除了病例报告,案例系列,以及用抗抑郁药增强TMS的临床研究,反之亦然。我们找到了10个RCT(n=654名参与者)并进行了荟萃分析。这表明,与活动臂中相同的抗抑郁药相比,主动TMS联合预先指定的抗抑郁药对MDD治疗具有更大的疗效(Hedge'sg=1;95%CI[0.27,1.73])。综述和荟萃分析表明,从MDD开始,将抗抑郁药与TMS结合使用具有更大的短期疗效。鉴于加速TMS方案在加速缓解MDD中的作用越来越大,并且我们的荟萃分析结果,我们提倡RCT检查各种抗抑郁药类别对MDD中这些TMS方案的短期和长期影响.这还可以优化和个性化维持TMS方案以防止MDD复发。
    There is a critical knowledge gap in optimally combining transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and antidepressants to treat patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). TMS is effective in treating MDD in patients who have failed at least one antidepressant trial, with accelerated protocols showing faster remission in treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Although clinicians routinely augment antidepressants with TMS, there is a knowledge gap in stopping versus continuing antidepressants or the dosing strategies when starting or tapering TMS. These considerations are important when considering maintenance TMS (delivered alone or in combination with suitable antidepressants) to maintain remission in MDD after the index course of TMS. As the first step towards filling this knowledge gap, we reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and open-label trials from 2 databases (PubMed/Medline and EMBASE) that compared active TMS combined with a pre-specified antidepressant dosed in the same manner for adults with MDD versus sham TMS combined with the same antidepressant as in the active arm. All studies were published between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2023. We excluded case reports, case series, and clinical studies that augmented TMS with antidepressants and vice versa. We found 10 RCTs (n = 654 participants) and performed a meta-analysis. This showed active TMS combined with pre-specified antidepressants had greater efficacy for MDD treatment than sham TMS combined with the same antidepressants as in the active arm (Hedge\'s g = 1; 95 % CI [0.27, 1.73]). The review and meta-analysis indicate greater short-term efficacy in combining antidepressants with TMS from the get-go in MDD. Given the increasing role of accelerated TMS protocols in expediting remission in MDD and the results of our meta-analysis, we advocate for RCTs examining the short-term and long-term effects of various antidepressant classes on these TMS protocols in MDD. This can also optimize and individualize maintenance TMS protocols to prevent relapse in MDD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号