ambulatory care

门诊护理
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在肌肉骨骼门诊理疗服务中,从物理治疗师到物理治疗支持工作者的临床任务的委派差异很大,从而导致患者护理的差异。这项研究旨在在物理治疗师之间达成共识,支持工作人员和管理人员了解未来框架中应包括哪些组件,以指导英国国家卫生服务肌肉骨骼门诊理疗服务中临床任务的有效和安全授权给理疗支持工作人员。
    方法:进行了一项共识研究,使用标称组技术。七个物理治疗师,通过特许物理治疗协会的专业网络和社交媒体招募了来自英国国家卫生服务局13个肌肉骨骼物理治疗服务的10名物理治疗支持工作者和10名物理治疗操作/临床线索。三个独立的,召集了针对特定角色的共识小组,涉及参与者产生,在李克特量表上讨论和评级,包含在未来授权框架中的组件。
    结果:38项产生的项目中有32项达成了≥70%的共识,即7分利克特量表的平均值≥4.9,跨三组。项目分为五个主要类别:1)物理治疗师和支持人员的培训/持续专业发展;2)需要明确的委派程序;3)能力4)定义支持人员的角色和5)安全网。
    结论:主要利益相关者团体能够就五个优先领域达成共识,这些领域将发展成为一个最佳实践框架,以标准化授权和指导物理治疗师在委派临床任务以支持工作者时。
    Delegation of clinical tasks from physiotherapists to physiotherapy support workers varies considerably in musculoskeletal outpatient physiotherapy services leading to variation in patient care. This study aimed to develop consensus amongst physiotherapists, support workers and managers about what components should be included in a future framework to guide effective and safe delegation of clinical tasks to physiotherapy support workers in United Kingdom\'s National Health Service musculoskeletal outpatient physiotherapy services.
    A consensus study was carried out, using Nominal Group Technique. Seven physiotherapists, ten physiotherapy support workers and ten physiotherapy operational/clinical leads from 13 musculoskeletal physiotherapy services within United Kingdom\'s National Health Service were recruited through the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy\'s professional networks and social media. Three separate, role-specific consensus groups were convened, involving participants generating, discussing and rating on a Likert scale, components for inclusion in a future delegation framework.
    32 out of 38 generated items reached consensus of ≥70%, i.e. a mean of ≥4.9 on a 7-point Likert scale, across the three groups. Items were grouped under five main categories: 1) training/Continuous Professional Development for physiotherapists and support workers; 2) need for a clear delegation process; 3) competencies 4) defining the role of support workers and 5) safety net.
    Key stakeholder groups were able to reach consensus on five priority areas which will be developed into a best practice framework to standardise delegation and guide physiotherapists when delegating clinical tasks to support workers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗是一种完善的冠状动脉疾病患者血运重建策略。最近的技术进步,如径向接入,第三代药物洗脱支架和高效抗血小板治疗显著改善了冠状动脉手术的安全性.尽管有一些实践指南和明确的患者倾向于早期出院,奥地利门诊病人进行冠状动脉手术的百分比仍然很低,主要是出于安全考虑。
    方法:本共识声明的目的是为在奥地利安全有效地实施冠状动脉门诊诊所提供一个实用的框架。根据结构化的文献综述和对现有实践指南的深入分析,在奥地利心脏病学会介入心脏病学(AGIK)工作组内制定了共识声明并进行了同行评审。
    结果:根据现有文献,与过夜相比,当天出院冠状动脉手术显示出良好的安全性,主要不良事件的风险没有增加。本文件在各种临床环境中提供了详细的共识。当天出院最重要的前提是,然而,适当选择合适的患者,并制定结构化的围介入和介入后管理计划。
    结论:根据数据分析,本共识文件为奥地利日托导管实验室项目的安全运行提供了详细的实践指南。
    BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention is a well-established revascularization strategy for patients with coronary artery disease. Recent technical advances such as radial access, third generation drug-eluting stents and highly effective antiplatelet therapy have substantially improved the safety profile of coronary procedures. Despite several practice guidelines and a clear patient preference of early hospital discharge, the percentage of coronary procedures performed in an outpatient setting in Austria remains low, mostly due to safety concerns.
    METHODS: The aim of this consensus statement is to provide a practical framework for the safe and effective implementation of coronary outpatient clinics in Austria. Based on a structured literature review and an in-depth analysis of available practice guidelinesconsensus statement was developed and peer-reviewed within the working group of interventional cardiology (AGIK) of the Austrian Society of Cardiology.
    RESULTS: Based on the available literature same-day discharge coronary procedures show a favorable safety profile with no increase in the risk of major adverse events compared to an overnight stay. This document provides a detailed consensus in various clinical settings. The most important prerequisite for same-day discharge is, however, adequate selection of suitable patients and a structured peri-interventional and postinterventional management plan.
    CONCLUSIONS: Based on the data analysis this consensus document provides detailed practice guidelines for the safe operation of daycare cathlab programs in Austria.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:最近的临床试验和指南更新强调了钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2i)在2型糖尿病(T2D)和包括动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)在内的合并症患者中使用的有效性和安全性。慢性肾脏病(CKD),或心力衰竭(HF)。目标:本研究评估了T2D和以下一种或多种合并症患者中基于指南的SGLT2i处方率:ASCVD,CKD,或HF,在AtriusHealth临床药房内的2022年美国糖尿病协会(ADA)指南发布之前和之后,内科,和专科医学部。方法:这是电子病历数据的回顾性图表回顾。符合上述标准的患者如果由临床药学部门管理,内科,或专科医学部。如果患者没有列出的任何合并症或T2D以外的糖尿病形式,则将其排除在外。结果:在入选的10631例患者中,354(3.3%)在研究期间在SGLT2i上启动。在2022年ADA指南发布之前,SGLT2i的平均开始次数为每周5次处方开始。指南发布开始后,每周增加到7次处方开始。次要结果显示,大部分SGLT2i处方是在内科开始的,其次是心脏病学和肾病学。结论:SGLT2i的总体利用率较低,但在2022年ADA指南发布后有所增加。这些结果表明在该患者群体中优化SGLT2i使用的机会。
    Background: Recent clinical trials and guideline updates have highlighted the efficacy and safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) use in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and comorbidities including atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), chronic kidney disease (CKD), or heart failure (HF). Objective: This study assesses the rates of guideline-based prescribing of SGLT2i in patients with T2D and one or more of the following comorbidities: ASCVD, CKD, or HF, prior to and after the 2022 American Diabetes Association (ADA) guideline publication within the Atrius Health clinical pharmacy, internal medicine, and specialty medicine departments. Methods: This is a retrospective chart review of data from the electronic medical record. Patients with the aforementioned criteria were included if they were managed by either the clinical pharmacy department, internal medicine, or specialty medicine departments. Patients were excluded if they did not have any of the comorbidities listed or a form of diabetes other than T2D. Results: Of the 10,631 patients enrolled, 354 (3.3%) were initiated on an SGLT2i during the study. The average number of SGLT2i initiations prior to the 2022 ADA guideline publication was five prescription starts per week. After the guideline publication initiation increased to seven prescription starts per week. Secondary outcomes showed the majority of SGLT2i prescriptions were started in the internal medicine department, followed by cardiology and nephrology. Conclusion: Overall utilization rates of SGLT2i are low but increased after the 2022 ADA guidelines were published. These results suggest opportunities to optimize the use of SGLT2i in this patient population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    当天紧急护理(SDEC)服务是国家卫生局紧急护理恢复计划的核心。SDEC中没有经过验证的护理质量指标。急性医学协会的质量改进委员会邀请了一个三阶段改进的德尔菲程序,以收集临床医生使用的指标。来自广泛背景的33名参与专家对拟议的指标进行了排名和进一步探讨,包括临床医生,数据科学家和运营经理。专家将五个基于系统的指标排名最高。这些重点是优化在SDEC单元内外接受相同日间护理的患者比例。患者和工作人员经验指标排名较低,可能是由于目前缺乏可行的例子。本文添加了词汇表,其中包含指标排名的基本原理及其在改善临床护理质量和安全性方面的应用。
    Same Day Emergency Care (SDEC) services are at the heart of recovery plans for Emergency Care in the National Health Service. There are no validated metrics for the quality of care in SDEC. The Society for Acute Medicine\'s Quality Improvement Committee invited to a three-stage modified Delphi process to gather metrics used by clinicians. Proposed metrics were ranked and further explored by 33 participating experts from a broad range of backgrounds including clinicians, data scientists and operational managers. Experts ranked five system-based metrics highest. These focus on optimisation of the proportion of patients receiving same day care in and out of SDEC units. Patient and staff experience metrics were ranked low, possibly due to present lack of viable examples. The paper adds a glossary with the rationale for ranking of metrics and their use for the improvement of quality and safety of clinical care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:这项研究解决了缺乏喂养障碍儿童护理定义的问题。关于关键绩效指标(KPI)的有限协议,以及缺乏与这些KPI相关的数据。
    方法:临床医生,参与新南威尔士州(NSW)门诊喂养护理的消费者和研究人员,澳大利亚应邀参加了一项两阶段研究。在阶段1中,使用了改进的德尔菲法。两轮投票导致了多学科儿科喂养诊所的新共识定义。另外三轮投票确定了相关的关键绩效指标。在第二阶段,KPI在10个诊所进行了前瞻性试验。
    结果:26名临床医生,消费者和研究人员参与了第一阶段。五轮投票的参与率从92%下降到60%,并创建了有效的定义和KPI集。在第2阶段,该定义和KPI在6周内在10家诊所进行了试点。收集了110例患者的数据。建议的28项指标的最终KPI集涵盖了临床特征,患者的人口统计学和医疗问题,亲子互动和结果测量。
    结论:现在有了多学科儿科喂养诊所的新定义,链接到涵盖相关绩效指标的标准化KPI集。这些在新南威尔士州10家诊所的基线数据收集中被证明是可行的。这为进一步收集数据奠定了基础,护理提供和结果的系统测量,和研究需要为儿科喂养障碍儿童提供护理改善。
    OBJECTIVE: This study addresses the absence of a definition of care for children with feeding disorders, limited agreement on key performance indicators (KPIs), and the lack of data linked to those KPIs.
    METHODS: Clinicians, consumers and researchers involved in outpatient feeding care in New South Wales (NSW), Australia were invited to participate in a two-Phase study. In Phase 1, a modified Delphi method was used. Two rounds of voting resulted in a new consensus definition of a multidisciplinary paediatric feeding clinic. Three further rounds voting determined relevant KPIs. In Phase 2, the KPIs were piloted prospectively in 10 clinics.
    RESULTS: Twenty-six clinicians, consumers and researchers participated in Phase 1. Participation across five voting rounds declined from 92% to 60% and a valid definition and KPI set were created. In Phase 2, the definition and KPIs were piloted in 10 clinics over 6 weeks. Data for 110 patients were collected. The final KPI set of 28 measures proposed covers clinical features, patient demographics and medical issues, parent-child interaction and outcome measures.
    CONCLUSIONS: A new definition of a multidisciplinary paediatric feeding clinic is now available, linked to a standardised KPI set covering relevant performance measures. These proved viable in baseline data collection for 10 clinics across NSW. This sets a foundation for further data collection, systematic measurement of care provision and outcomes, and research needed to deliver care improvement for children with paediatric feeding disorder.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    住院期间血压升高(BP)的管理差异很大,许多住院成人的BPs高于门诊推荐的BPs。
    系统地确定医院血压升高管理指南。
    MEDLINE,国际网络准则,和专业协会网站,2010年1月1日至2024年1月29日。
    门诊成人和老年人群血压管理的临床实践指南,急诊科,和住院设置。
    两位作者独立筛选了文章,评估质量,并提取数据。分歧通过协商一致解决。关于治疗目标的建议,首选抗高血压药,并收集了门诊和住院设置的随访。
    14项临床实践指南符合纳入标准(根据AGREEII[评估与评估指南II]工具评估了11项高质量),11提供了广泛的BP管理建议,每个都是针对急诊科设置的,老年人,和高血压危机。没有指南提供住院患者BP的目标或在医院管理无症状中度升高的BP的建议。六个指南将高血压紧迫性定义为血压高于180/120mmHg,高血压急症需要增加靶器官损伤。高血压急诊建议始终包括在重症监护环境中使用静脉抗高血压药。管理高血压急症的建议不一致,从专家共识来看,专注于急诊科。最常建议门诊口服药物治疗和几天到几周的随访。相比之下,明确了门诊血压目标,在130/80和140/90mmHg之间变化。
    排除非英语指南和特定于亚群的指南。
    尽管对门诊血压管理达成了普遍共识,缺乏无症状的血压升高的住院管理指导,这可能会导致不同的实践模式。
    国家老龄研究所。(PROSPERO:CRD42023449250)。
    UNASSIGNED: Management of elevated blood pressure (BP) during hospitalization varies widely, with many hospitalized adults experiencing BPs higher than those recommended for the outpatient setting.
    UNASSIGNED: To systematically identify guidelines on elevated BP management in the hospital.
    UNASSIGNED: MEDLINE, Guidelines International Network, and specialty society websites from 1 January 2010 to 29 January 2024.
    UNASSIGNED: Clinical practice guidelines pertaining to BP management for the adult and older adult populations in ambulatory, emergency department, and inpatient settings.
    UNASSIGNED: Two authors independently screened articles, assessed quality, and extracted data. Disagreements were resolved via consensus. Recommendations on treatment targets, preferred antihypertensive classes, and follow-up were collected for ambulatory and inpatient settings.
    UNASSIGNED: Fourteen clinical practice guidelines met inclusion criteria (11 were assessed as high-quality per the AGREE II [Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II] instrument), 11 provided broad BP management recommendations, and 1 each was specific to the emergency department setting, older adults, and hypertensive crises. No guidelines provided goals for inpatient BP or recommendations for managing asymptomatic moderately elevated BP in the hospital. Six guidelines defined hypertensive urgency as BP above 180/120 mm Hg, with hypertensive emergencies requiring the addition of target organ damage. Hypertensive emergency recommendations consistently included use of intravenous antihypertensives in intensive care settings. Recommendations for managing hypertensive urgencies were inconsistent, from expert consensus, and focused on the emergency department. Outpatient treatment with oral medications and follow-up in days to weeks were most often advised. In contrast, outpatient BP goals were clearly defined, varying between 130/80 and 140/90 mm Hg.
    UNASSIGNED: Exclusion of non-English-language guidelines and guidelines specific to subpopulations.
    UNASSIGNED: Despite general consensus on outpatient BP management, guidance on inpatient management of elevated BP without symptoms is lacking, which may contribute to variable practice patterns.
    UNASSIGNED: National Institute on Aging. (PROSPERO: CRD42023449250).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管一些指南建议射血分数降低(HFrEF)的心力衰竭患者接受血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(ACEI/ARBs)或血管紧张素受体-脑啡肽抑制剂(ARNIs)治疗,β受体阻滞剂,盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRA),和钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白-2抑制剂(SGLT2i),在哥伦比亚,他们的处方和剂量仍然存在一些差距。本研究旨在描述哥伦比亚心力衰竭登记处(RECOLFACA)中HFrEF治疗的使用模式。
    方法:纳入2017-2019年RECOLFACA的HFrEF患者。使用绝对数和比例评估心力衰竭(HF)药物处方和每日剂量。将内科专家治疗的患者的治疗方案与心脏病专家治疗的患者进行了比较。
    结果:在注册的2,528名患者中,1,384(54.7%)有HFrEF。在这些人中,88.9%的人是处方β受体阻滞剂,72.3%与ACEI/ARB,67.9%与MRA,和13.1%的ARNI。此外,只有不到三分之一的患者达到了欧洲HF指南推荐的目标剂量.在由内科专家或心脏病专家治疗的患者之间,未观察到治疗方案或目标剂量的显着差异。
    结论:哥伦比亚的处方率和目标剂量实现均不理想。然而,与一些最新的HF注册相比,RECOLFACA的β受体阻滞剂和MRA的处方率最高。然而,ARNI仍然被低估。持续的注册更新可以改善适合ARNI和SGLT2i治疗的患者的识别,以促进其在临床实践中的使用。
    BACKGROUND: Although several guidelines recommend that patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) be treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ACEIs/ARBs) or angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs), beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i), there are still several gaps in their prescription and dosage in Colombia. This study aimed to describe the use patterns of HFrEF treatments in the Colombian Heart Failure Registry (RECOLFACA).
    METHODS: Patients with HFrEF enrolled in RECOLFACA during 2017-2019 were included. Heart failure (HF) medication prescription and daily dose were assessed using absolute numbers and proportions. Therapeutic schemes of patients treated by internal medicine specialists were compared with those treated by cardiologists.
    RESULTS: Out of 2,528 patients in the registry, 1,384 (54.7%) had HFrEF. Among those individuals, 88.9% were prescribed beta-blockers, 72.3% with ACEI/ARBs, 67.9% with MRAs, and 13.1% with ARNIs. Moreover, less than a third of the total patients reached the target doses recommended by the European HF guidelines. No significant differences in the therapeutic schemes or target doses were observed between patients treated by internal medicine specialists or cardiologists.
    CONCLUSIONS: Prescription rates and target dose achievement are suboptimal in Colombia. Nevertheless, RECOLFACA had one of the highest prescription rates of beta-blockers and MRAs compared to some of the most recent HF registries. However, ARNIs remain underprescribed. Continuous registry updates can improve the identification of patients suitable for ARNI and SGLT2i therapy to promote their use in clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:使用增强恢复计划(ERP)对择期结肠切除术患者的护理已变得越来越标准化。ERP,纳入微创手术(MIS),降低术后发病率和住院时间(LOS)。然而,在非卧床或当日出院(SDD)环境中,需要进行破坏性改变以安全地进行结肠切除术.很少有研究小组显示出卧床结肠切除术的可行性。到目前为止,尚未定义该程序的护理质量的最低标准.这项研究旨在确定质量指标(QI),以评估非卧床结肠切除术的护理质量。
    方法:进行了文献检索以确定门诊结肠切除术的建议。根据那次搜索,确定了一组QI,并将其分为七个领域:患者的准备(入院前),麻醉,手术,医院监测,家庭监控,可行性,和临床结果。该列表在1轮Delphi中提交给国际专家小组(外科医生和麻醉师),以评估拟议指标的相关性。
    结果:基于文献检索(2010-2021年),在标题和摘要上筛选了3841个结果,以获取相关信息。九篇论文被扣留以确定第一组QI(n=155)。排除重复和过时的QI后,这个名单缩小到88个指标。之后,在1轮Delphi中就32个QIs的最终名单达成了共识,旨在成为评估门诊结肠切除术护理质量的综合方案。
    结论:我们提出了一份32个QI的清单,以指导和评估非卧床结肠切除术的实施。
    BACKGROUND: Care for patients undergoing elective colectomy has become increasingly standardized using Enhanced Recovery Programs (ERP). ERP, encorporating minimally invasive surgery (MIS), decreased postoperative morbidity and length of stay (LOS). However, disruptive changes are needed to safely introduce colectomy in an ambulatory or same-day discharge (SDD) setting. Few research groups showed the feasibility of ambulatory colectomy. So far, no minimum standards for the quality of care of this procedure have been defined. This study aims to identify quality indicators (QIs) that assess the quality of care for ambulatory colectomy.
    METHODS: A literature search was performed to identify recommendations for ambulatory colectomy. Based on that search, a set of QIs was identified and categorized into seven domains: preparation of the patient (pre-admission), anesthesia, surgery, in-hospital monitoring, home monitoring, feasibility, and clinical outcomes. This list was presented to a panel of international experts (surgeons and anesthesiologists) in a 1 round Delphi to assess the relevance of the proposed indicators.
    RESULTS: Based on the literature search (2010-2021), 3841 results were screened on title and abstract for relevant information. Nine papers were withheld to identify the first set of QIs (n = 155). After excluding duplicates and outdated QIs, this longlist was narrowed down to 88 indicators. Afterward, consensus was reached in a 1 round Delphi on a final list of 32 QIs, aiming to be a comprehensive set to evaluate the quality of ambulatory colectomy care.
    CONCLUSIONS: We propose a list of 32 QI to guide and evaluate the implementation of ambulatory colectomy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:就急病儿童父母的安全联网建议(SNA)的内容和形式达成共识。
    方法:使用在线问卷和临床和研究专家的反馈进行四轮改良的e-Delphi。
    方法:高收入国家的门诊护理。
    方法:来自13个国家的41名专家:3名急诊医师,15名全科医生,4名护士和19名儿科医生。
    结果:专家将SNA的内容定义为对正常,临时诊断的预期病程,诊断不确定性,警报信号,表明需要医疗帮助以及在哪里以及如何找到此类帮助的信息。关于国民账户体系的形式,专家们一致认为,可靠的来源应在每次适当的医疗保健会议上以简短而简单的授权方式口头向SNA提供纸质或数字书面或视频/图像资源,具体到孩子的情况,并寻求父母的确认反馈。
    结论:SNA需要包含有关预期病程的建议,警报信号以及在哪里以及如何找到帮助。它应该由可靠的医疗保健专业人员或数字平台口头提供书面资源。短,简单而具体,SNA需要授权应检查其对建议的理解的父母。父母和专家共同制作的国民账户体系资源的有效性应在不同的环境中进行评估,提供国民账户体系的资源需要最新和可靠的培训。
    Develop a consensus on the content and form of safety netting advice (SNA) for parents of acutely ill children.
    Four-round modified e-Delphi using online questionnaires and feedback among clinical and research experts.
    Ambulatory care in high-income countries.
    Forty-one experts from 13 countries: 3 emergency physicians, 15 general practitioners, 4 nurses and 19 paediatricians.
    The experts defined the content of SNA as advice on the normal, expected disease course of the provisional diagnosis, diagnostic uncertainty, alarm signs that indicate the need for medical help and information on where and how to find such help. Regarding the form of the SNA, the experts agree that a reliable source should give SNA verbally with paper or digital written or video/image resources at every appropriate healthcare encounter in a short and simple empowering fashion, specific to the child\'s situation and seek confirmatory feedback from parents.
    SNA needs to contain advice on the expected disease course, alarm signs and where and how to find help. It should be given verbally with written resources by a reliable healthcare professional or digital platform. Short, simple and specific, SNA needs to empower the parent whose understanding of the advice should be checked. The effectiveness of SNA resources coproduced by parents and experts should be assessed in different settings and those providing SNA require up-to-date and reliable training.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    精确,可靠,需要具有成本效益并需要合理的实施时间和精力的有效指标来推动电子健康记录(EHR)的改进并减轻EHR负担。度量的研究和供应商定义之间存在差异。过程:我们召集了三个利益相关者团体(卫生系统信息学领导人,EHR供应商代表,和研究人员)在虚拟研讨会系列中就障碍达成共识,解决方案,以及实施核心EHR的后续步骤在动态护理中使用指标。结论:为解决EHR指标实施挑战的核心类别而确定的可行解决方案包括:(1)保持广泛的利益相关者参与,(2)跨供应商就标准化措施定义达成协议,(3)整合临床医生的观点,(4)解决认知和EHR负担。在本次研讨会产出的势头的基础上,为克服实施EHR使用指标的障碍提供了希望。
    Precise, reliable, valid metrics that are cost-effective and require reasonable implementation time and effort are needed to drive electronic health record (EHR) improvements and decrease EHR burden. Differences exist between research and vendor definitions of metrics. PROCESS:  We convened three stakeholder groups (health system informatics leaders, EHR vendor representatives, and researchers) in a virtual workshop series to achieve consensus on barriers, solutions, and next steps to implementing the core EHR use metrics in ambulatory care. CONCLUSION:  Actionable solutions identified to address core categories of EHR metric implementation challenges include: (1) maintaining broad stakeholder engagement, (2) reaching agreement on standardized measure definitions across vendors, (3) integrating clinician perspectives, and (4) addressing cognitive and EHR burden. Building upon the momentum of this workshop\'s outputs offers promise for overcoming barriers to implementing EHR use metrics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号