The heterogeneous nature of asthma results in a wide range of presentations during exacerbation. Despite UK pre-hospital management guidelines focusing on β₂ agonists, variables such as cause, severity, underlying health, comorbidities, and drug side effects can often make emergency treatment optimisation difficult. This article examines paramedics\' methods of observing, perceiving, interpreting, and treating asthma with β₂ agonists, often acting on limited information in rapidly evolving situations. We recruited paramedics from a single UK National Health Service ambulance Trust for qualitative semi-structured interviews. Responses underwent framework analysis to identify data similarities and differences. Fifteen qualitative interviews with paramedics revealed three main themes affecting patient management: clinician experience of presentation, adaptation of patient management approaches, and severity of side effects. Paramedics felt their ability to manage various asthma presentations was enhanced through guideline adaptation based on their own clinical experience and understanding of β₂ agonist side effects, allowing tailored responses based on a set of reinforcing factors. Inductive analysis revealed additional complexities within these themes, such as anxiety and diabetes, which may influence β₂ agonist administration and result in multiple care pathways being initiated during exacerbation. Paramedic care mirrors asthma\'s complexity, accounting for a range of characteristics. A dynamic, critically thought approach enables patient management to be based on the presenting conditions rather than strict adherence to a single algorithm. Comprehending the complexities and variables in treatment can be crucial to how paramedics rationalise their treatment and optimise the care provided.

OBJECTIVE: To explore Finnish paramedics\' perceptions of work-related performance expectations in relation to work experience, and understand how organizational socialization contributes to understanding paramedics\' performance expectations.
METHODS: A qualitative design with a deductive-inductive approach utilizing a social constructivist framework. The organizational socialization framework by Wanberg was used as the theoretical basis.
METHODS: Data were collected between May and August 2023, using group and individual interviews of newly graduated (n = 9) and experienced paramedics (n = 13). Participants were recruited via social media channels. Data were first analyzed deductively, according to constructs of the organizational socialization framework (role clarity, task mastery, and social acceptance), then inductively, using codes not utilized in the deductive phase.
METHODS: Interviewed Finnish paramedics (N = 22), both newly graduated paramedics (n = 9) and experienced paramedics (n = 13). The interviews were performed remotely and then transcribed into text.
RESULTS: Our findings showed comparable performance expectations between newly graduated and experienced paramedics, mismatches in role clarity of paramedic work, challenges in both learning and upholding professional competence, and difficulties of social acceptance into the paramedic community. There were variations in how expectations were perceived between groups, indicating that experience might partly affect how paramedics identify and manage performance expectations. The organizational socialization framework enables the contextualization of these performance expectations.
CONCLUSIONS: Paramedic work involves challenges to upholding clinical competence, aligning to a professional role, and social integration into the professional community. Our research contributes to understanding how paramedics perceive these challenges as performance expectations in different stages of their careers and how they could be managed utilizing a framework for organizational socialization. The socialization of paramedics into the workforce needs to account for these performance expectations, especially considering the changing paradigm of paramedic work, role, and societal expectations.
UNASSIGNED: No Patient or Public Contribution.

BACKGROUND: Due to work commitments, shiftworkers often obtain inadequate sleep, consequently experiencing negative health, wellbeing, and safety outcomes. Given shiftworkers may have limited control over their work commitments, lifestyle and environmental factors within their control may present an intervention opportunity. However, such interventions require tailoring to ensure applicability for this sleep-vulnerable population.
METHODS: A randomised waitlist control pilot trial investigated the effectiveness of mobile health application Sleepfit, which delivered a tailored sleep health intervention aimed at improving sleep health and sleep hygiene outcomes amongst paramedic shiftworkers. Outcome measures of self-reported sleep health (sleep need, duration, and quality, fatigue, Insomnia Severity Index, Fatigue Severity Scale, and Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores) and sleep hygiene (Sleep Hygiene Index score) were collected at baseline, post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up.
RESULTS: Fifty-eight paramedics (aged 33.4 ± 8.0 years; 50% male) were recruited, and trialed Sleepfit for a 14-day intervention period between August 2021-January 2022. For all participants, there was a significant reduction in Insomnia Severity Index and Sleep Hygiene index scores after intervention engagement. Regression models demonstrated no significant intervention effect on sleep health or sleep hygiene outcomes (intervention versus waitlist control group). A high study drop-out rate (91.4%) prevented assessment of outcomes at 3-month follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Pilot trial findings demonstrate that Sleepfit may elicit improvements in sleep health and sleep hygiene outcomes amongst paramedic shiftworkers. However, low enrolment and retention means that findings should be interpreted with caution, further highlighting potential engagement challenges, especially among paramedics who are particularly in need of support for improved sleep.
BACKGROUND: Prospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry 24/01/2020 (reference no. ACTRN12620000059965).

UNASSIGNED: Calls have been made for paramedics to have some form of care pathway that they could use to safely divert adults with epilepsy away from emergency departments and instigate ambulatory care improvements. Different configurations are possible. To know which to prioritise for implementation/evaluation, there is a need to determine which are acceptable to service users and likely National Health Service-feasible.
UNASSIGNED: (1) Identify configurations being considered, (2) understand service users\' views of them and current provision, (3) identify what sort of care service users want and (4) determine which configuration(s) is considered to achieve optimal balance in meeting users\' preference and being National Health Service-feasible.
UNASSIGNED: Service providers were surveyed to address objective 1. Interviews with service users addressed objective 2. Objective 3 was addressed by completing discrete choice experiments. These determined users\' care preferences for different seizure scenarios. Objective 4 was addressed by completing \'knowledge exchange\' workshops. At these, stakeholders considered the findings on users\' stated preferences and judged different pathway configurations against Michie\'s \'acceptability, practicability, effectiveness, affordability, side-effects and equity\' feasibility criteria.
UNASSIGNED: This project took place in England. The survey recruited representatives from neurology and neuroscience centres and from urgent and emergency care providers. For the interviews, recruitment occurred via third-sector support groups. Recruitment for discrete choice experiments occurred via the North West Ambulance Service NHS Trust and public advert. Workshop participants were recruited from neurology and neuroscience centres, urgent and emergency care providers, support groups and commissioning networks.
UNASSIGNED: Seventy-two services completed the survey. Interviews were conducted with 25 adults with epilepsy (and 5 relatives) who had emergency service contact in the prior 12 months. Discrete choice experiments were completed by 427 adults with epilepsy (and 167 relatives) who had ambulance service contact in the prior 12 months. Workshops were completed with 27 stakeholders.
UNASSIGNED: The survey identified a range of pathway configurations. They differed in where they would take the patient and their potential to instigate ambulatory care improvements. Users had been rarely consulted in designing them. The discrete choice experiments found that users want a configuration of care markedly different to that offered. Across the seizure scenarios, users wanted their paramedic to have access to their medical records; for an epilepsy specialist (e.g. an epilepsy nurse, neurologist) to be available to advise; for their general practitioner to receive a report; for the incident to generate an appointment with an epilepsy specialist; for the care episode to last < 6 hours; and there was a pattern of preference to avoid conveyance to emergency departments and stay where they were. Stakeholders judged this configuration to be National Health Service-feasible within 5-10 years, with some elements being immediately deployable.
UNASSIGNED: The discrete choice experiment sample was broadly representative, but those reporting recent contact with an epilepsy specialist were over-represented.
UNASSIGNED: Users state they want a configuration of care that is markedly different to current provision. The configuration they prefer was, with support and investment, judged to likely be National Health Service-feasible. The preferred configuration should now be developed and evaluated to determine its actual deliverability and efficacy.
UNASSIGNED: The study is registered as researchregistry4723.
UNASSIGNED: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: 17/05/62) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 12, No. 24. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Ambulances often attend to people with epilepsy. Most of them are taken to the hospital’s accident and emergency department. This typically has little benefit since most patients are already diagnosed and visit the accident and emergency department with non-emergency states. To change things, National Health Service organisations want an ‘alternative care pathway’ for paramedics to use. It could mean the person is not taken to the accident and emergency department but cared for elsewhere. Our project brought stakeholders together to develop an alternative care pathway that includes things important to patients and carers but is also National Health Service-feasible. Seventy National Health Service organisations first told us via a survey and a workshop which pathways they were considering and which might be feasible. Thirty people with epilepsy and their family members and friends were then interviewed. They explained what is wanted after a seizure and problems with current care. One problem was that going to the accident and emergency department does not lead to them getting a follow-up appointment with an epilepsy specialist to check their treatment is right. Using ‘discrete choice experiments’, around 430 people with epilepsy who recently contacted the ambulance service and 170 of their family and friends were asked to make a choice between alternative packages of care, to say which pathway they would prefer in different seizure situations. The results were clear. People wanted care different from what National Health Service organisations told us was available. The choice experiment showed everyone prefers pathways where paramedics have access to their medical records, an epilepsy specialist is available to advise the paramedic, the general practitioner gets a report and they get an appointment with an epilepsy specialist in the future. Everyone wants to avoid long episodes of care (6 hours) and after a typical seizure people with epilepsy want to stay at home. Three workshops were run with paramedics, epilepsy specialists and managers. They said the alternative care pathway wanted by users could be National Health Service-feasible. There is a need to implement and evaluate it now.

BACKGROUND: As first responders, paramedics are an extremely important part of the care chain. COVID-19 significantly impacted their working circumstances. We examined, according to the experiences and observations of paramedics, (1) what kinds of emotions the Emergency Medical Service (EMS) personnel experienced in their new working circumstances, and (2) what work-related factors became resources for the well-being of EMS personnel during the initial months of the COVID-19 pandemic.
METHODS: This qualitative study utilized reflective essay material written by experienced, advanced-level Finnish paramedics (n = 30). The essays used in this study were written during the fall of 2020 and reflected the period when Finland had declared a state of emergency (on 17.3.2020) and the Emergency Powers Act was implemented. The data was analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis.
RESULTS: The emotions experienced by the EMS personnel in their new working circumstances formed three themes: (1) New concerns arose that were constantly present; (2) Surviving without proper guidance; and (3) Rapidly approaching breaking point. Three themes were formed from work-related factors that were identified as resources for the well-being of the EMS personnel. These were: (1) A high level of organizational efficiency was achieved; (2) Adaptable EMS operations; and (3) Encouraging atmosphere.
CONCLUSIONS: Crisis management practices should be more attentive to personnel needs, ensuring that managerial and psychological support is readily available in crisis situations. Preparedness that ensures effective organizational adaptation also supports personnel well-being during sudden changes in working circumstances.

OBJECTIVE: Following recent changes to the German Narcotics Act, this article examines prehospital analgesia by paramedics using piritramide vs. nalbuphine + paracetamol.
METHODS: Prehospital analgesia administered by paramedics from the Fulda (piritramide) and Gütersloh (nalbuphine + paracetamol) emergency services was compared regarding pain intensity at the beginning and end of the mission, measured using the numeric rating scale (NRS). Additionally, an analysis of the resulting complications was carried out.
RESULTS: In this study 2429 administrations of analgesia were evaluated (nalbuphine + paracetamol: 1635, 67.3%, initial NRS: 8.0 ± 1.4, end of NRS: 3.7 ± 2.0; piritramide: 794, 32.7%, initial NRS: 8.5 ± 1.1, end of NRS: 4.5 ± 1.6). Factors influencing NRS change were initial NRS (regression coefficient, RC: 0.7075, 95% confidence interval, CI: 0.6503-0.7647, p < 0.001), treatment with nalbuphine + paracetamol (RC: 0.6048, 95% CI: 0.4396-0.7700, p < 0.001). Treatment with nalbuphine + paracetamol (n = 796 (48.7%)) compared to piritramide (n = 190 (23.9%)) increased the odds of achieving NRS < 4 (odds ratio, OR: 2.712, 95% CI: 2.227-3.303, p < 0.001). Complications occurred in n = 44 (5.5%) with piritramide and in n = 35 (2.1%) with nalbuphine + paracetamol. Risk factors for complications were analgesia with piritramide (OR: 2.699, 95% CI: 1.693-4.301, p < 0.001), female sex (OR: 2.372, 95% CI: 1.396-4.029, p = 0.0014), and age (OR: 1.013, 95% CI: 1.002-1.025, p = 0.0232).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with piritramide, prehospital analgesia with nalbuphine + paracetamol has favorable effects in terms of analgesic efficacy and complication rates and should therefore be considered in future recommendations for paramedics.
UNASSIGNED: FRAGESTELLUNG: Angesichts der Änderungen des Betäubungsmittelgesetzes untersucht die vorliegende Arbeit die prähospitale Analgesie durch Notfallsanitäter*innen mittels Piritramid vs. Nalbuphin + Paracetamol.
UNASSIGNED: Alle prähospitalen Analgesien durch Notfallsanitäter*innen der Rettungsdienste der Kreise Fulda (Piritramid) sowie Gütersloh (Nalbuphin + Paracetamol) wurden im Hinblick auf die Schmerzstärke anhand der Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) zu Einsatzbeginn und -ende sowie die aufgetretenen Komplikationen ausgewertet.
UNASSIGNED: Insgesamt wurden 2429 Analgesien ausgewertet (Nalbuphin + Paracetamol: 1635 (67,3 %), NRS-initial: 8,0 ± 1,4, NRS-Einsatzende: 3,7 ± 2,0; Piritramid: 794 (32,7 %), NRS-initial: 8,5 ± 1,1, NRS-Einsatzende: 4,5 ± 1,6). Faktoren mit Einfluss auf eine NRS-Veränderung waren: initiale NRS (Regressionskoeffizient (RK): 0,7075, 95 %-Konfidenzintervall (95 %-KI): 0,6503–0,7647, p < 0,001) sowie Therapie mit Nalbuphin + Paracetamol (RK: 0,6048, 95 %-KI: 0,4396–0,7700, p < 0,001). Die Therapie mit Nalbuphin + Paracetamol (n = 796 (48,7 %)) im Vergleich zu Piritramid (n = 190 (23,9 %)) erhöhte die Chancen, eine NRS < 4 am Einsatzende aufzuweisen (Odds Ratio (OR): 2,712, 95 %-KI: 2,227–3,303, p < 0,001). Komplikationen traten bei Therapie mit Piritramid bei n = 44 (5,5 %) und bei Nalbuphin + Paracetamol bei n = 35 (2,1 %) auf. Risikofaktoren für Komplikationen waren Analgesie mit Piritramid (OR: 2,699, 95 %-KI: 1,693–4,301, p < 0,001), weibliches Geschlecht (OR: 2,372, 95 %-KI: 1,396–4,029, p = 0,0014) sowie das Lebensalter (OR: 1,013, 95 %-KI: 1,002–1,025, p = 0,0232).
CONCLUSIONS: Im Vergleich mit Piritramid weist die prähospitale Analgesie mit Nalbuphin + Paracetamol günstige Effekte im Hinblick auf analgetische Effektivität und Komplikationsraten auf und sollte in zukünftigen Empfehlungen für Notfallsanitäter*innen berücksichtigt werden.

BACKGROUND: Paramedicine is a dynamic profession which has evolved from a \"treat and transport\" service into a complex network of health professionals working in a diverse range of clinical roles. Research is challenging in the paramedicine context, and internationally, research capacity and culture has developed slowly. International examples of research agendas and strategies in paramedicine exist, however, research priorities have not previously been identified in Ireland.
METHODS: This study was a three round electronic modified Delphi design which aimed to establish the key aspects of the research priorities via end-user consensus. Participants included interested stakeholders involved in prehospital care or research in Ireland. The first round questionnaire consisted of open-ended questions with results coded and developed into themes for the closed-ended questions used in the second and third round questionnaires. A consensus level of 70% was set a priori for second and third rounds.
RESULTS: Research Priorities that reached consensus included Staff Wellbeing, Education and Professionalism and Acute Medical Conditions. Respondents indicated that these three areas should be a priority in the next 2 years. Education, Staffing and Leadership were imperative Key Resources that required change. Education was a Key Processes change deemed imperative to allow the future research to occur. Outcomes that should be included in the future research strategy were Patient Outcomes, Practitioner Development, Practitioner Wellbeing, Alternate Pathways, Evidence-based Practice and Staff Satisfaction.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study are similar to previously published international studies, with some key differences. There was a greater emphasis on Education and Practitioner Wellbeing with the latter possibly attributed to the timing of the research in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic. The disseminated findings of this study should inform sustainable funding models to aid the development of paramedicine research in Ireland.

UNASSIGNED: Before the COVID-19 pandemic began, medical staff and academic department workers reported increasing levels of stress and burnout because of strain on the health care system. The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated this strain and introduced several novel stressors, which included transitioning to remote work. Safe and scalable strategies are needed to help health care workers cope with these stressors. Aromatherapy may help address this need.
UNASSIGNED: To assess the effect of 2 aromatherapy interventions (essential oil blends termed STILL and FOCUS) on perceived mental/psychological health parameters for academic department workers working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic.
UNASSIGNED: Participants were advised to use STILL for 5 days (Monday through Friday). After a 2-day washout period (Saturday and Sunday), participants were instructed to use FOCUS for 5 days (Monday through Friday). Participants completed a visual analog scale survey evaluating restlessness, fatigue, anxiety, stress, happiness, energy, relaxation, calmness, and well-being before and after each of the 2 intervention periods.
UNASSIGNED: Twenty academic department remote workers participated in the study. Mental/psychological health surveys were completed by 6 participants before and after using STILL and by 10 before and after using FOCUS. Five participants answered all survey questions before and after both interventions. Although mean (SD) perceived stress scores improved after both the STILL (4.3 [2.3] vs 1.8 [1.7], P = .03) and FOCUS (2.9 [2.3] vs 1.5 [1.4], P = .02) interventions, this improvement was not statistically significant after Bonferroni correction (adjusted α = .006). Most participants (73.3%) reported that participating in the study was worthwhile, and 81.3% indicated that they would recommend aromatherapy to others.
UNASSIGNED: The STILL and FOCUS aromatherapy interventions did not significantly improve mental/psychological health parameters for remote academic department workers, although perceived stress was marginally improved and participants reported a perceived benefit from using aromatherapy.

BACKGROUND: Allied health assistants (AHAs) support allied health professionals (AHPs) to meet workforce demands in modern healthcare systems. In an Australian context historically, AHAs have been sub-optimally utilised. Prior research has identified that AHAs and AHPs working in health, disability and aged care sectors, and the Vocational Education and Training (VET) industry, may benefit from access to resources to support the optimisation of the AHA workforce. As a part of a Victorian department of health funded project, several resources were developed in line with workforce recommendations for use in each of the above sectors. Recommendations and resources covered the broad areas of pre-employment training, workforce planning and governance, consumer-centred therapy and supports, recruitment and induction and workplace training and development. This study aimed to evaluate the engagement with these newly designed resources to support optimisation of AHAs in the Victorian context.
METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted to evaluate engagement with resources, from the perspective of AHAs, AHPs and allied health leaders (AHLs) in the health, aged care or disability sectors, and educators and managers of allied health assistance training. Thematic analysis was conducted using team-based framework analysis.
RESULTS: Thematic framework analysis of the interview data identified four themes; Why participants accessed the resources; How participants engaged with the resources; What (if any) changes in practice occurred as a result of engaging with the resources in a participant\'s local context, How did participants envision the resources being utilised for AHA workforce optimisation in the future. Responses were mapped to the AHA workforce career pathway at the career preparation, career development and career trajectory tiers.
CONCLUSIONS: Appetite for AHA workforce development and optimal utilisation is evident across Victoria, Australia. Readily accessible resources that inform AHA role and scope of practice, delegation practice, or improve the ability for an AHA to state their own development needs, were identified as useful by participants. The potential for these resources to assist in the optimal utilisation and development of AHA workforces across the career continuum differs according to the role, sector and geographical location of the resource user. Further study is needed to investigate the transferability of these resources to national and global contexts.

BACKGROUND: Emergency personnel are the first line of emergency response systems to respond to emergencies; in essence, they are usually exposed to a wide range of physical and psychological problems. Accordingly, the current study aimed to clarify the lived experiences of paramedics when exposed to Patients\' Deaths during their missions in 2023.
METHODS: This study was carried out using a qualitative approach and interpretative phenomenology from January 9, 2022, to September 21, 2023. The research was performed in Fars, Alborz, and Isfahan provinces in Iran. Data were gathered using semi-structured interviews with 17 male emergency personnel (both from the emergency medical service and Red Crescent). The obtained data were analyzed utilizing Smith\'s approach to clarify the lived experiences of emergency responders when facing deaths in various incidents in Iran.
RESULTS: Seventeen emergency personnel with the age range of 24-60 (average = 39) years and with a history of confronting patients\' deaths during their services were interviewed. Their lived experiences of being exposed to patients\' deaths during the emergency response in Iran were classified into three main themes: psychological and emotional status, personality, disposition, and behavior status, and mental and physical status. Sub-themes such as psychological and emotional problems, mental and physical problems, and sub-subthemes such as anxiety, stress, decreased appetite, irritability, insomnia, forgetfulness, and fatigue were also noted within the main themes.
CONCLUSIONS: While emergency personnel work diligently to save the lives of patients, the current study demonstrated that they were susceptible to multiple psychological, emotional, and physical problems, which potentially affect their lives outside of the workplace and make them more vulnerable to related physiological and psychological diseases. It is recommended that policymakers and clinical educators make ways to prevent these problems and provide emergency personnel with physical, psychological, and emotional support.