The heterogeneous nature of asthma results in a wide range of presentations during exacerbation. Despite UK pre-hospital management guidelines focusing on β₂ agonists, variables such as cause, severity, underlying health, comorbidities, and drug side effects can often make emergency treatment optimisation difficult. This article examines paramedics\' methods of observing, perceiving, interpreting, and treating asthma with β₂ agonists, often acting on limited information in rapidly evolving situations. We recruited paramedics from a single UK National Health Service ambulance Trust for qualitative semi-structured interviews. Responses underwent framework analysis to identify data similarities and differences. Fifteen qualitative interviews with paramedics revealed three main themes affecting patient management: clinician experience of presentation, adaptation of patient management approaches, and severity of side effects. Paramedics felt their ability to manage various asthma presentations was enhanced through guideline adaptation based on their own clinical experience and understanding of β₂ agonist side effects, allowing tailored responses based on a set of reinforcing factors. Inductive analysis revealed additional complexities within these themes, such as anxiety and diabetes, which may influence β₂ agonist administration and result in multiple care pathways being initiated during exacerbation. Paramedic care mirrors asthma\'s complexity, accounting for a range of characteristics. A dynamic, critically thought approach enables patient management to be based on the presenting conditions rather than strict adherence to a single algorithm. Comprehending the complexities and variables in treatment can be crucial to how paramedics rationalise their treatment and optimise the care provided.

BACKGROUND: Efficient utilisation of allied health workforce may help address the predicted shortfall of 18 million health workers estimated by 2030. Knowledge about allied health professionals\' attrition, or intention to leave, and factors influencing attrition can assist in developing evidence-informed strategies to mitigate this issue. The review aimed to map attrition and attrition intention rates, and its attributing factors for allied health professions worldwide.
METHODS: Adhering to the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted across academic databases (PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, CINAHL, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library database) and grey literature (Google, Google Scholar, organisational websites). Two reviewers independently undertook a two-stage screening process along with data extraction using customised data extraction forms. A narrative synthesis was used to synthesise the data.
RESULTS: Thirty-two studies published between 1990 and 2024 were included. Attrition rates ranged from 0.5% to 41% across allied health disciplines. Pharmacists demonstrated the lowest attrition rates, while audiologists reported the highest. Radiographers reported the lowest intent to leave at 7.6%, while occupational therapists showed highest intent to leave, ranging from 10.7% to 74.1%. The analysis revealed three recurring themes contributing to attrition: profession-centric factors (e.g., career progression, job satisfaction, support, and professional growth), systemic-centric factors (e.g., compensation, staffing challenges, clinical practices, patient care, workload), and individual-centric factors (e.g., recognition, the need for change, and burnout).
CONCLUSIONS: Attrition in allied health remains a significant challenge. Addressing this issue requires a systemic, nuanced, and evidence-based approach, given the complex, interlinked, and multifaceted factors contributing to attrition. The younger workforce, characterized by changing generational values, necessitates innovative thinking, intersectoral collaboration, and the potential for co-created solutions with, for, and by the allied health workforce.

OBJECTIVE: To explore Finnish paramedics\' perceptions of work-related performance expectations in relation to work experience, and understand how organizational socialization contributes to understanding paramedics\' performance expectations.
METHODS: A qualitative design with a deductive-inductive approach utilizing a social constructivist framework. The organizational socialization framework by Wanberg was used as the theoretical basis.
METHODS: Data were collected between May and August 2023, using group and individual interviews of newly graduated (n = 9) and experienced paramedics (n = 13). Participants were recruited via social media channels. Data were first analyzed deductively, according to constructs of the organizational socialization framework (role clarity, task mastery, and social acceptance), then inductively, using codes not utilized in the deductive phase.
METHODS: Interviewed Finnish paramedics (N = 22), both newly graduated paramedics (n = 9) and experienced paramedics (n = 13). The interviews were performed remotely and then transcribed into text.
RESULTS: Our findings showed comparable performance expectations between newly graduated and experienced paramedics, mismatches in role clarity of paramedic work, challenges in both learning and upholding professional competence, and difficulties of social acceptance into the paramedic community. There were variations in how expectations were perceived between groups, indicating that experience might partly affect how paramedics identify and manage performance expectations. The organizational socialization framework enables the contextualization of these performance expectations.
CONCLUSIONS: Paramedic work involves challenges to upholding clinical competence, aligning to a professional role, and social integration into the professional community. Our research contributes to understanding how paramedics perceive these challenges as performance expectations in different stages of their careers and how they could be managed utilizing a framework for organizational socialization. The socialization of paramedics into the workforce needs to account for these performance expectations, especially considering the changing paradigm of paramedic work, role, and societal expectations.
UNASSIGNED: No Patient or Public Contribution.

BACKGROUND: Group allied health interventions for people with chronic conditions may be a solution to increasing access to allied health in primary care. This umbrella review aimed to determine the effectiveness of allied health group interventions to improve health-related outcomes for adults with chronic conditions and the applicability of the findings to the Australian primary health care context.
METHODS: An umbrella review of systematic reviews conducted April-July 2022, searching eight databases. Systematic reviews were eligible if they included randomised controlled trials (RCT) or quasi-RCTs, community dwelling adults aged ≥ 18, at least one chronic condition, group intervention in scope for allied health professionals, and published in English after 2000. Studies were excluded if interventions were conducted in hospital or aged care facilities, out of scope for allied health, or unsupervised.
RESULTS: Two thousand three hundred eighty-five systematic reviews were identified: after screening and full text review 154 were included and data extracted from 90. The chronic conditions included: cancer (n = 15), cardiovascular disease (n = 6), mixed chronic conditions (n = 3), kidney disease (n = 1), low back pain (n = 12), respiratory disease (n = 8), diabetes (n = 14), heart failure (n = 9), risk of falls (n = 5), hypertension (n = 4, osteoarthritis (n = 6) and stroke (n = 8). Most group interventions included prescribed exercise and were in scope for physiotherapists and exercise physiologists. Overall, allied health group exercise programs for community dwelling adults improved health outcomes for most chronic conditions. Aggregated data from the systematic reviews suggests programs of 45-60 min per session, 2-3 times per week for 12 weeks. Lifestyle education and support for people with type-2 diabetes improved glycaemic control.
CONCLUSIONS: Prescribed group exercise delivered by allied health professionals, predominantly by exercise physiologists and physiotherapists, significantly improved health outcomes for community dwelling adults with a broad range of chronic conditions.

This study identified evidence and considerations for allied health clinicians in providing group interventions for people with cognitive impairment. A scoping review was conducted by searching the MEDLINE (Ovid), CINHAL (EBSCOhost), Scopus (Elsevier), Embase (Ovid) and TROVE databases from 2016. Articles of any study design in which group interventions were performed by an allied health professional with participants with cognitive impairment were included. Data on physical, cognitive, psychological, and quality of life measures were extracted from the selected articles. Standardised mean changes (SMC) were calculated. Ten articles were included in the study. No article directly compared group interventions versus one-to-one interventions. The results of the meta-analysis showed significant improvements after the intervention in the physical (SMC = 0.42, P = 0.013), cognitive (SMC = 0.43, P = 0.005), psychological (SMC = 0.14, P = 0.005), and quality of life domains (SMC = 0.28, P = 0.002). This review identified considerations for clinicians when developing group interventions for people with cognitive impairments, including specific participant criteria, increasing support, modifications to intervention difficulty, and environmental considerations. Group intervention for people with cognitive impairments demonstrated moderate effectiveness in improving physical and cognitive domains and a small effect in improving psychological and quality of life domains. Specific considerations are recommended when clinicians provide group interventions for people with cognitive impairments.

BACKGROUND: Due to work commitments, shiftworkers often obtain inadequate sleep, consequently experiencing negative health, wellbeing, and safety outcomes. Given shiftworkers may have limited control over their work commitments, lifestyle and environmental factors within their control may present an intervention opportunity. However, such interventions require tailoring to ensure applicability for this sleep-vulnerable population.
METHODS: A randomised waitlist control pilot trial investigated the effectiveness of mobile health application Sleepfit, which delivered a tailored sleep health intervention aimed at improving sleep health and sleep hygiene outcomes amongst paramedic shiftworkers. Outcome measures of self-reported sleep health (sleep need, duration, and quality, fatigue, Insomnia Severity Index, Fatigue Severity Scale, and Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores) and sleep hygiene (Sleep Hygiene Index score) were collected at baseline, post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up.
RESULTS: Fifty-eight paramedics (aged 33.4 ± 8.0 years; 50% male) were recruited, and trialed Sleepfit for a 14-day intervention period between August 2021-January 2022. For all participants, there was a significant reduction in Insomnia Severity Index and Sleep Hygiene index scores after intervention engagement. Regression models demonstrated no significant intervention effect on sleep health or sleep hygiene outcomes (intervention versus waitlist control group). A high study drop-out rate (91.4%) prevented assessment of outcomes at 3-month follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Pilot trial findings demonstrate that Sleepfit may elicit improvements in sleep health and sleep hygiene outcomes amongst paramedic shiftworkers. However, low enrolment and retention means that findings should be interpreted with caution, further highlighting potential engagement challenges, especially among paramedics who are particularly in need of support for improved sleep.
BACKGROUND: Prospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry 24/01/2020 (reference no. ACTRN12620000059965).

BACKGROUND: The dynamic and challenging work environment of the prehospital emergency care settings creates many challenges for paramedics. Previous studies have examined adverse events and patient safety activities, but studies focusing on paramedics\' perspectives of factors contributing to human error are lacking. In this study, we investigated paramedics\' opinions of the factors contributing to human errors.
METHODS: Data was collected through semi-structured individual interviews (n = 15) with paramedics and emergency medical field supervisors in Finland. The data was analyzed using inductive content analysis. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research were used.
RESULTS: Contributing factors to human errors were divided into three main categories. The first main category, Changing work environment, consisted of two generic categories: The nature of the work and Factors linked to missions. The second main category, Organization of work, was divided into three generic categories: Inadequate care guidelines, Interaction challenges and Challenges related to technological systems. The third main category, Paramedics themselves, consisted of four generic categories: Issues that complicate cognitive processing, Individual strains and needs, Attitude problems and Impact of work experience.
CONCLUSIONS: Various factors contributing to human errors in emergency medical services (EMS) settings were identified. Although many of them were related to individual factors or to the paramedics themselves, system-level factors were also found to affect paramedics\' work and may therefore negatively impact patient safety. The findings provide insights for organizations to use this knowledge proactively to develop their procedures and to improve patient safety.

Background Ambulance callouts and conveyances continue to increase disproportionately to population growth. This is largely driven by low- and medium-acuity patients who do not require ambulance management. We aimed to estimate the proportion of patients paramedics have conveyed to an emergency department (ED) via ambulance whom they considered suitable for primary care, and understand the barriers that contributed to these decisions. Methods A cross-sectional survey of registered paramedics in Victoria, Australia, was undertaken using an online questionnaire during 2022. Responses are presented using descriptive statistics, and logistic regression was used to identify associations between paramedic characteristics and barriers influencing primary care pathway referral. Results A total of 367 responses were received. Of these, 70% of paramedics reported that at least half of the patients they conveyed to an ED were suitable for a primary care pathway. Paramedics reported high levels of confidence and support for primary care pathways in lieu of transport, however this had no correlation with their self-reported practice. The most common barrier to primary care pathway referral was limited access to a suitable primary care pathway (68%) followed by fear of an internal complaint, litigation or organisational pressure to convey patients to an ED (66%). Paramedics regarded themselves as more supportive of primary care pathway referral than those around them, including their peers, mentors, employers and university. They also reported that the COVID-19 pandemic had increased their personal support for primary care pathways, as well as organisational support from their employer, without corresponding increase in the broader medical and public communities. In fact, paramedics reported the COVID-19 pandemic had decreased support from the public and patients to refer patients to primary care pathways, and 57% of paramedics reported conveying a patient that had declined their primary care referral in the past week. Conclusions Paramedics frequently convey to an ED patients who they believe are appropriate for a primary care pathway. Paramedics face practical barriers such as a lack of available primary care providers and perceived lack of cultural support that contribute to this practice.

UNASSIGNED: Calls have been made for paramedics to have some form of care pathway that they could use to safely divert adults with epilepsy away from emergency departments and instigate ambulatory care improvements. Different configurations are possible. To know which to prioritise for implementation/evaluation, there is a need to determine which are acceptable to service users and likely National Health Service-feasible.
UNASSIGNED: (1) Identify configurations being considered, (2) understand service users\' views of them and current provision, (3) identify what sort of care service users want and (4) determine which configuration(s) is considered to achieve optimal balance in meeting users\' preference and being National Health Service-feasible.
UNASSIGNED: Service providers were surveyed to address objective 1. Interviews with service users addressed objective 2. Objective 3 was addressed by completing discrete choice experiments. These determined users\' care preferences for different seizure scenarios. Objective 4 was addressed by completing \'knowledge exchange\' workshops. At these, stakeholders considered the findings on users\' stated preferences and judged different pathway configurations against Michie\'s \'acceptability, practicability, effectiveness, affordability, side-effects and equity\' feasibility criteria.
UNASSIGNED: This project took place in England. The survey recruited representatives from neurology and neuroscience centres and from urgent and emergency care providers. For the interviews, recruitment occurred via third-sector support groups. Recruitment for discrete choice experiments occurred via the North West Ambulance Service NHS Trust and public advert. Workshop participants were recruited from neurology and neuroscience centres, urgent and emergency care providers, support groups and commissioning networks.
UNASSIGNED: Seventy-two services completed the survey. Interviews were conducted with 25 adults with epilepsy (and 5 relatives) who had emergency service contact in the prior 12 months. Discrete choice experiments were completed by 427 adults with epilepsy (and 167 relatives) who had ambulance service contact in the prior 12 months. Workshops were completed with 27 stakeholders.
UNASSIGNED: The survey identified a range of pathway configurations. They differed in where they would take the patient and their potential to instigate ambulatory care improvements. Users had been rarely consulted in designing them. The discrete choice experiments found that users want a configuration of care markedly different to that offered. Across the seizure scenarios, users wanted their paramedic to have access to their medical records; for an epilepsy specialist (e.g. an epilepsy nurse, neurologist) to be available to advise; for their general practitioner to receive a report; for the incident to generate an appointment with an epilepsy specialist; for the care episode to last < 6 hours; and there was a pattern of preference to avoid conveyance to emergency departments and stay where they were. Stakeholders judged this configuration to be National Health Service-feasible within 5-10 years, with some elements being immediately deployable.
UNASSIGNED: The discrete choice experiment sample was broadly representative, but those reporting recent contact with an epilepsy specialist were over-represented.
UNASSIGNED: Users state they want a configuration of care that is markedly different to current provision. The configuration they prefer was, with support and investment, judged to likely be National Health Service-feasible. The preferred configuration should now be developed and evaluated to determine its actual deliverability and efficacy.
UNASSIGNED: The study is registered as researchregistry4723.
UNASSIGNED: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: 17/05/62) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 12, No. 24. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Ambulances often attend to people with epilepsy. Most of them are taken to the hospital’s accident and emergency department. This typically has little benefit since most patients are already diagnosed and visit the accident and emergency department with non-emergency states. To change things, National Health Service organisations want an ‘alternative care pathway’ for paramedics to use. It could mean the person is not taken to the accident and emergency department but cared for elsewhere. Our project brought stakeholders together to develop an alternative care pathway that includes things important to patients and carers but is also National Health Service-feasible. Seventy National Health Service organisations first told us via a survey and a workshop which pathways they were considering and which might be feasible. Thirty people with epilepsy and their family members and friends were then interviewed. They explained what is wanted after a seizure and problems with current care. One problem was that going to the accident and emergency department does not lead to them getting a follow-up appointment with an epilepsy specialist to check their treatment is right. Using ‘discrete choice experiments’, around 430 people with epilepsy who recently contacted the ambulance service and 170 of their family and friends were asked to make a choice between alternative packages of care, to say which pathway they would prefer in different seizure situations. The results were clear. People wanted care different from what National Health Service organisations told us was available. The choice experiment showed everyone prefers pathways where paramedics have access to their medical records, an epilepsy specialist is available to advise the paramedic, the general practitioner gets a report and they get an appointment with an epilepsy specialist in the future. Everyone wants to avoid long episodes of care (6 hours) and after a typical seizure people with epilepsy want to stay at home. Three workshops were run with paramedics, epilepsy specialists and managers. They said the alternative care pathway wanted by users could be National Health Service-feasible. There is a need to implement and evaluate it now.

BACKGROUND: Work-integrated learning (WIL) is a core aspect of allied health education. WIL placements typically focus on developing clinical skills, with broader conceptions of work readiness a secondary consideration. Near-peer mentoring (NPM), where senior students mentor junior students, is one WIL placement model that holds promise for developing students\' work readiness, along with additional benefits for educators and service users. While there is emerging evidence of the benefits of NPM in allied health, a more comprehensive understanding of the design and outcomes of NPM WIL placements for allied health students, their educators and service users is needed.
METHODS: A systematic search of seven electronic databases (CINAHL, ERIC, ProQuest Education, Medline, PsychInfo, EMBASE and Scopus) from 2003 to 2022 was conducted with 4195 records reviewed. Included studies reported on near-peer mentoring between at least one of the identified 11 allied health professionals providing services to real people (i.e. not simulation). Data extracted included pedagogical approaches, type of service model and relationship of peers to each other and educator, objectives for implementing the NPM, and effects for students. Quality appraisal was undertaken using the Standards for Reporting of Qualitative Research (SRQR).
RESULTS: Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The majority were North American in origin, from the disciplines of pharmacy, physiotherapy, psychology and occupational therapy, and used a range of research designs. Four types of placement design were observed from incidental co-location of students and observing outcomes through to deliberate preparation of students and/or educators for their roles in a NPM placement. Outcomes for junior students included lowered anxiety leading to increased confidence and motivation to learn and thus enhanced clinical skills. Senior student outcomes included development of educator skills, increased confidence, and enhanced professional reasoning. Service users and educators also benefited from NPM; however, evidence was sparse in these areas.
CONCLUSIONS: The evidence supports near-peer mentoring as a valuable WIL model to support work readiness, and several general pedagogical designs are evident. Future research should design NPM WIL with a greater integration of educational theory and evaluate outcomes beyond satisfaction and self-reported experiences.