自2019年底以来,2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)已成为全球共同关注的公共卫生问题。随着2022年12月初10项新指南防疫政策的实施,中国已经进入了防控的新阶段。疫情的死灰复燃可能会对大学生的行为造成负面影响。本研究旨在评估认知之间的关系,影响,10份新指南发布后,大学生行为变化及相关影响因素,以及当前防疫过程中遇到的困难或担忧。为政府制定有针对性的防疫策略提供参考。
■这项研究是一项横断面调查。自2022年12月25日至2023年3月13日,使用便利和滚雪球抽样方法进行在线调查,将自行设计的问卷分发给杭州一所大学的学生。数据分析涉及描述性分析,非参数检验,相关性,多元线性回归,和内容分析。
■大学生对COVID-19的认知水平中等到较高,情感水平中等。然而,行为改变水平较低,平均得分为2.33分(2.00,3.00).多元线性回归分析显示,女性,更高等级,医学专业,情感因素,认知因素是行为改变的影响因素,占行为变化差异的35.7%。困难或忧虑包括忧虑(84.8%),缺乏信息(39.3%),和对未来的不确定性(55.1%)。
■大学生的预防行为有所放松。指出了基于证据的量身定制政策制定。本研究建议学校和政府可以通过调整防疫政策制定策略来提高大学生防疫的有效性,拓宽防疫信息传播渠道,完善“政府-社区-学校-家庭”协同治理机制。
UNASSIGNED: Since late 2019, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic has become a common public health concern globally. China has entered a new phase of prevention and control with the implementation of the 10 new
guidelines epidemic prevention policy in early December 2022. The resurgence of the outbreak may cause negative consequences on the behaviour of university students. This study aimed to assess the relationship between cognition,
affect, and behavioural changes among university students and the related influencing factors after 10 new
guidelines were issued, as well as the difficulties or concerns encountered in the current epidemic prevention process. It also provides a reference for the government to formulate targeted epidemic prevention strategies.
UNASSIGNED: This study is a cross-sectional investigation. Self-designed questionnaires were distributed to students of a university in Hangzhou between December 25, 2022, and March 13, 2023, using convenience and snowball sampling methods for online surveys. Data analysis involved descriptive analysis, non-parametric tests, correlation, multiple linear regression, and content analyses.
UNASSIGNED: University students had a moderate to high level of cognition about COVID-19 and a medium level of
affect. However, the level of behavioural changes was low and the average score was 2.33 (2.00, 3.00). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that female sex, higher grade, medical specialty, affective factor, and cognitive factor were influencing factors of behavioural changes, which accounted for 35.7% of the variance in behavioural change. Difficulties or concerns included apprehension (84.8%), lack of information (39.3%), and uncertainty about the future (55.1%).
UNASSIGNED: The prevention behaviour of university students has slackened. Evidence-based tailored policy development is indicated. This study suggested that schools and the government can improve the effectiveness of epidemic prevention among university students by adjusting the strategy of epidemic prevention policy formulation, broadening the channels of epidemic prevention information dissemination, and improving the mechanism of \"government-community-school-family\" collaborative governance.