World War II

第二次世界大战
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对第二次世界大战时期的26个岩骨和掌骨骨的骨p的比较分析显示,DNA产量或STR分型的成功率没有显着差异。岩骨之间DNA保存的意外均等,骨骼遗骸中内源性DNA的著名来源,和掌骨的骨phy,它们是多孔的,容易受到植物学变化的影响,令人惊讶。在这项研究中,我们引入ATR-FTIR光谱作为一种方法来揭示骨分子结构和DNA保存之间的相关性。对具有相同织物学历史的掌骨和岩骨进行采样并准备进行DNA分析。虽然一部分样本用于DNA分析,另一例接受了ATR-FTIR光谱检查.比较了掌骨骨和岩骨骨的归一化光谱和FTIR指数。因为使用的遗骸的纺织历史相对较短和稳定,ATR-FTIR光谱揭示了两种骨骼类型之间的细微结构差异。岩骨表现出更高的矿化,而附生含有更多的有机物。在掌骨骨phy中意外保存DNA可能归因于小梁内软组织残留物的存在。在这里观察到的骨骼分子结构的差异表明,有不同的机制可以在骨骼组织中保存DNA。
    A comparative analysis of 26 petrous bones and epiphyses of metacarpals from the Second World War era revealed no significant differences in DNA yield or success in STR typing. This unexpected parity in DNA preservation between the petrous bone, a renowned source of endogenous DNA in skeletal remains, and the epiphyses of metacarpals, which are porous and susceptible to taphonomic changes, is surprising. In this study, we introduced ATR-FTIR spectroscopy as an approach to unravel the correlation between bone molecular structure and DNA preservation. Metacarpals and petrous bones with same taphonomic history were sampled and prepared for DNA analyses. While one portion of the sample was used for DNA analysis, the other underwent ATR-FTIR spectroscopic examination. The normalized spectra and FTIR indices between the epiphyses of metacarpals and petrous bones were compared. Because the taphonomic history of the remains used is relatively short and stable, the ATR-FTIR spectroscopy unveiled subtle structural differences between the two bone types. Petrous bones exhibited higher mineralization, whereas epiphyses contained more organic matter. The unexpected preservation of DNA in the epiphyses of metacarpals can likely be attributed to the presence of soft tissue remnants within the trabeculae. Here observed differences in the molecular structure of bones indicate there are different mechanisms enabling DNA preservation in skeletal tissues.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    虽然与年龄有关的疾病的危险因素可能会增加多发病率(MM),早期生活剥夺也可能加速慢性疾病和MM的发展。
    本研究探讨了MM在65-71岁以前出生的个体中的患病率和模式。during,第二次世界大战后,德国南部基于2008/9和2016年的两项大型横断面KORA(奥格斯堡地区合作健康研究)-年龄研究。MM被定义为患有至少两种慢性疾病,出生时期分为五个阶段:战前,早期战争,战争后期,饥荒,在饥荒时期之后。使用Logistic回归模型分析出生阶段对MM的影响,并调整社会人口统计学和生活方式危险因素。此外,我们使用聚集层次聚类来研究疾病的共现。
    与其他阶段出生的参与者相比,在战争后期出生的参与者的MM和单一慢性疾病患病率最高(62.2%)。在调整社会人口统计学和生活方式因素后,出生在战争后期与MM的几率显着相关(OR=1.83,95%CI:1.15-2.91)。在女性中,关节的患病率,胃肠,眼部疾病,焦虑更高,而心脏病,中风,糖尿病在男性中更为常见。此外,负责观察到的关联的三个主要慢性疾病集群被确定为:关节和心身,心脏代谢和,其他内脏疾病。
    我们的发现表明,在65-71岁的成年人中,不良的早期暴露可能会增加MM的风险。此外,确定的疾病集群不是偶然的,需要更多的调查。
    While risk factors for age-related diseases may increase multimorbidity (MM), early life deprivation may also accelerate the development of chronic diseases and MM.
    This study explores the prevalence and pattern of MM in 65-71 year-old individuals born before, during, and after World War II in Southern Germany based on two large cross-sectional KORA (Cooperative Health Research in the Region of Augsburg) -Age studies in 2008/9 and 2016. MM was defined as having at least two chronic diseases, and birth periods were classified into five phases: pre-war, early war, late war, famine, and after the famine period. Logistic regression models were used to analyze the effect of the birth phases on MM with adjustment for sociodemographic and lifestyle risk factors. Furthermore, we used agglomerative hierarchical clustering to investigate the co-occurrence of diseases.
    Participants born during the late war phase had the highest prevalence of MM (62.2%) and single chronic diseases compared to participants born during the other phases. Being born in the late war phase was significantly associated with a higher odds of MM (OR = 1.83, 95% CI: 1.15-2.91) after adjustment for sociodemographic and lifestyle factors. In women, the prevalence of joint, gastrointestinal, eye diseases, and anxiety was higher, while heart disease, stroke, and diabetes were more common in men. Moreover, three main chronic disease clusters responsible for the observed associations were identified as: joint and psychosomatic, cardiometabolic and, other internal organ diseases.
    Our findings imply that adverse early-life exposure may increase the risk of MM in adults aged 65-71 years. Moreover, identified disease clusters are not coincidental and require more investigation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: Epidemiological studies in different traumatised samples indicate an increased risk for numerous physical and mental diseases. It is suspected that this is due to chronic changes in fundamental processes in the immune, nervous, and endocrine systems, which take years to manifest pathologically. Previous studies have considered intervals of a few decades. However, little is known about whether a link between trauma and physical and mental health can be established over very long periods of time and in the oldest old population.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 1,299 German citizens aged 80 and above were interviewed about on-going suffering from the effects of traumatic World War II (WWII) events as well as about physical and mental health. Multiple linear and logistic regression models were used to assess the impact of suffering from the effects of traumatic events on general health, several medical conditions, multimorbidity, pain, and depression.
    UNASSIGNED: 43.94% of the oldest old were still suffering from the effects of traumatic events in connection with WWII. Participants who were still suffering from the effects of traumatic events were more likely to be treated for heart failure, blood diseases, bladder problems, back pain, respiratory or lung diseases, and sleep disorders. They also had poorer general health, higher multimorbidity, more pain, and higher depression scores.
    UNASSIGNED: Findings suggest that chronic psychological suffering from the effects of traumatic events in early life is associated with impaired physical and mental health even seven decades after the events.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Historical Article
    The genetic identification of skeletal remains found in Second World War mass graves is complicated because of the poor quality of the samples. The aim of this study was to set up a workflow for STR typing of such samples combining PCR/CE and PCR/NGS technologies. To this end, 57 DNA samples from an equal number of 75-year-old femurs were studied. After a first round of PCR typing using GlobalFiler CE, 42 samples yielded a full profile and were therefore submitted to our standard workflow. The 15 samples that yielded no or a limited number (2-17/21) of autosomal STR markers as well four bone control samples that provided a full profile with the conventional PCR/CE test were typed in duplicate by the GlobalFiler NGS kit. Despite the degradation of the samples, which resulted in lower coverage and a lower % of on-target reads, reliable sequencing data were obtained from 16/19 samples. The use of a threshold of 30× for the locus call led to a consensus profile (cp) of 20-31/31 STR autosomal loci in 10 samples and to a cp of 8-10/31 loci in two samples, whereas the four control samples yielded a cp of 26-31/31 loci. Finally, the data of the NGS typing were combined with those of the CE typing. This last task allowed us to recover (on average) three alleles per sample and to increase the number of the heterozygous patterns in 37 cases. In total, the combined approach proposed here made possible the genetic typing of 65-100% of the autosomal STR markers in 10/15 (66.6 %) skeletal remains that yielded no or very poor results with the conventional PCR/CE approach. However, because several artefacts (such as allelic drop-out and allelic drop-in) were scored, the risk of mistyping cannot be neglected.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Historical Article
    The present study focuses on the group of pathologists who (1) were appointed honorary members or bearers of the Rudolf Virchow Medal by the German Society for Pathology (DGP) and (2) experienced the Third Reich as a citizen of the Third Reich. In particular, it examines the relationship between those distinguished persons and National Socialism, and, at the same time, the criteria of the professional society when awarding such honors. Specifically, it is important to clarify what role the DGP officials ascribed to the political stance or experience of the candidates in the Nazi dictatorship during the selection process: were there victims of the Nazis among the honorees whose repressive experiences and personal fates were intended to be acknowledged in this way? Of equal interest is the counter-question: were pathologists honored who had made (party) political commitments to National Socialism during the Third Reich?A total of nine Virchow medallists and three honorary members met the inclusion criteria. None of those affected belonged to the group of pathologists who suffered injustice during the Third Reich or who could be described as victims of the Nazis. On the other hand, four of the nine German Virchow medal winners and one of the three honorary members had joined the National Socialist Party and to some extent other Nazi organisations. Obviously, previous closeness to National Socialism was not a decisive factor in the selection of honorary members and Virchow medallists and, in particular, was not an exclusion criterion.The aforementioned results correspond to the findings of a parallel study, in which the political past of the German DGP chairmen appointed up to 1986 was examined. This showed that two thirds of them had joined the National Socialist Party during the Third Reich.
    UNASSIGNED: Die vorliegende Studie richtet den Fokus auf den Kreis der Pathologen, die (1) von der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pathologie (DGP) zu Ehrenmitgliedern oder zu Trägern der Rudolf-Virchow-Medaille ernannt wurden und (2) das „Dritte Reich“ als erwachsene Personen erlebt haben. Sie untersucht insbesondere das Verhältnis der Ausgezeichneten zum Nationalsozialismus und damit zugleich die Kriterien der Fachgesellschaft bei der Vergabe derartiger Ehrungen. Konkret gilt es zu klären, welche Rolle die DGP-Verantwortlichen beim Auswahlprozess der politischen Haltung bzw. Erfahrung der Kandidaten in der NS-Diktatur beimaßen: Finden sich unter den Geehrten NS-Opfer, deren repressive Erfahrungen und Lebensschicksale man auf diese Weise würdigen wollte? Ebenso interessiert die Gegenfrage: Wurden Pathologen geehrt, die sich im „Dritten Reich“ (partei)politisch zum Nationalsozialismus bekannt hatten?Insgesamt erfüllen neun Virchow-Medaillenträger und drei Ehrenmitglieder die Einschlusskriterien. Keine der betreffenden Personen gehört zum Kreis der Pathologen, die im „Dritten Reich“ Unrecht erlitten hatten bzw. als NS-Opfer bezeichnet werden können. Demgegenüber waren vier der neun deutschen Virchow-Medaillenträger bzw. eines der drei Ehrenmitglieder der NSDAP und z. T. weiteren NS-Organisationen beigetreten. Offenkundig war die frühere Nähe zum Nationalsozialismus bei der Auswahl der Ehrenmitglieder und Virchow-Medaillenträger kein maßgeblicher Gesichtspunkt und insbesondere kein Ausschlusskriterium.Besagte Ergebnisse korrespondieren mit den Resultaten einer parallel durchgeführten Studie, in der die politische Vergangenheit der bis 1986 berufenen deutschen DGP-Vorsitzenden untersucht wurden. Diese ergab, dass sich zwei Drittel derselben im „Dritten Reich“ der Partei der Nationalsozialisten angeschlossen hatten.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Historical Article
    关于医学界在第三帝国犯罪中的同谋的研究正在增加。这也适用于第二次世界大战后医生在国际审判中被绳之以法的程度。这个话题,然而,关于德国牙医,几乎没有被考虑过,更不用说系统的调查了。正是这一差距,本文将解决。首先,我们定量识别所有在战后被绳之以法的牙医。第二,我们给出了这个群体的简介。我们专注于以下问题:该小组中的谁被审判,什么时候?他们被指控犯有什么罪行,宣判了哪些判决,这些句子如何影响他们的未来生活?我们的研究主要基于档案来源,我们对相关的二级文献进行了分析。与战争结束后几乎从未要求牙医接受审判的普遍假设相反,我们确认了48名牙医在法庭上被指控。被指控的典型牙医是男性,生活在传统的家庭模式中,属于国家社会主义工人党(NSDAP)和Waffen-SS(Schutzstaffel),也是所谓的克里格桑吉一代的一部分。对这些人最常见的指控是盗窃被谋杀的纳粹受害者的牙科黄金,牙医特有的指控;谋杀或过失杀人的(从犯);以及参与集中营中致命的选择。总的来说,八名牙医被处决。一般来说,这些诉讼和判决发生得更早,判决越严厉。许多被判入狱的人随后回到了牙科行业。
    Studies on the complicity of the medical profession in the crimes of the Third Reich are on the rise. This also applies to the question of the extent to which doctors were brought to justice in international trials after World War II. This topic, however, has hardly been considered-let alone systematically investigated-with respect to German dentists. It is precisely this gap that this article will address. First, we quantitatively identify all dentists who were brought to justice in the post-war period. Second, we give a profile of this group. We focus on the following questions: Who among the group was brought to trial, and when? What crimes were they accused of, which sentences were handed down, and how did these sentences affect their future lives? Our study is based primarily on archival sources, which we analyzed with respect to the relevant secondary literature. Contrary to the widely-held assumption that dentists had almost never had been made to stand trial after the end of the war, we identified 48 dentists who were accused in court. The prototypical accused dentist was male, lived in a traditional family model, belonged to the National Socialist Workers\' Party (NSDAP) and the Waffen-SS (Schutzstaffel), and was part of the so-called Kriegsjugendgeneration. The most frequent allegations made against these men were the theft of dental gold of murdered Nazi victims, an accusation unique to dentists; (accessory to) murder or manslaughter; and involvement in the deadly selections made in the concentration camps. In total, eight dentists were executed. Generally speaking, the earlier these proceedings and the sentencing took place, the harsher the sentence was. Many of those who received prison sentences subsequently found their way back into the dental profession.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Historical Article
    本研究的重点是一组病理学家,这些病理学家(1)被德国病理学会(DGP)任命为鲁道夫·Virchow奖章的名誉成员或获得者,以及(2)经历过“第三帝国”公民的“第三帝国”。特别是,它研究了这些杰出人士与国家社会主义之间的关系,and,同时,授予此类荣誉时专业协会的标准。具体来说,重要的是要澄清DGP官员在选拔过程中对纳粹专政候选人的政治立场或经验所起的作用:在受奖者中是否有纳粹的受害者,他们的镇压经历和个人命运打算以这种方式得到承认?同样感兴趣的是反问题:病理学家是否受到表彰,他们在“第三次入选”期间对国家社会主义做出了(政党)政治承诺?总共9名荣誉成员达到了这些受影响的人都不属于在“第三帝国”期间遭受不公正待遇或可以被描述为纳粹受害者的病理学家。另一方面,9名德国Virchow奖章获得者中有4名和3名荣誉成员中有1名加入了国家社会党,并在一定程度上加入了其他纳粹组织。显然,以前与国家社会主义的亲密关系并不是选拔荣誉会员和Virchow奖章获得者的决定性因素,特别是,不是排除标准。上述结果与平行研究的结果一致,其中审查了1986年之前任命的德国DGP主席的政治历史。这表明他们中有三分之二在“第三帝国”期间加入了国家社会党。
    The present study focuses on the group of pathologists who (1) were appointed honorary members or bearers of the Rudolf Virchow Medal by the German Society for Pathology (DGP) and (2) experienced the \"Third Reich\" as a citizen of the \"Third Reich\". In particular, it examines the relationship between those distinguished persons and National Socialism, and, at the same time, the criteria of the professional society when awarding such honours. Specifically, it is important to clarify what role the DGP officials ascribed to the political stance or experience of the candidates in the Nazi dictatorship during the selection process: were there victims of the Nazis among the honourees whose repressive experiences and personal fates were intended to be acknowledged in this way? Of equal interest is the counter-question: were pathologists honoured who had made (party)political commitments to National Socialism during the \"Third Reich\"?A total of 9 Virchow medallists and 3 honorary members met the inclusion criteria. None of those affected belonged to the group of pathologists who suffered injustice during the \"Third Reich\" or who could be described as victims of the Nazis. On the other hand, 4 of the 9 German Virchow medal winners and 1 of the 3 honorary members had joined the National Socialist Party and to some extent other Nazi organisations. Obviously, previous closeness to National Socialism was not a decisive factor in the selection of honorary members and Virchow medallists and, in particular, was not an exclusion criterion.The aforementioned results correspond to the findings of a parallel study, in which the political past of the German DGP chairmen appointed up to 1986 was examined. This showed that two thirds of them had joined the National Socialist Party during the \"Third Reich\".
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Historical Article
    During World War Two, a group of Dutch nurses chose to join the Nederlandse Ambulance (\'Easternfront Ambulance\'), a controversial though currently relatively unknown field hospital for the eastern front. In doing so, they supported the German war effort. This case study elaborates on the motives of these women to make a choice that was ultimately determined as \'wrong\', by emphasising their unique gender role of nurse in the public sphere. By providing an insight into a relatively small group of \'wrong\' women, this article aims to act as a call for further research into the gender context of limitations and opportunities of Dutch women during the German occupation. These nurses appear to have had various intentional and unintentional motives for enlisting. Nearly all of them later claimed they had pursued a \'calling\'. They had all been Nazi or Nationalist Socialist Movement in the Netherlands sympathisers and they had all enjoyed material benefits due to their position with the field hospital. In a few cases, it seems they had longed for interaction with soldiers, or men in general, and sometimes they had simply craved for an adventurous life far from home.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    发病率趋势可能来自关键发育年龄的队列经验。我们的目标是比较65-71岁的人的健康状况在关键发育年龄之前(1937-1945年6月),在第二次世界大战后的德国早期重建和粮食危机(ERFC)期间(1945年6月至1948年6月)和之后(1948年6月至1950年)。数据来自德国南部的KORA(奥格斯堡地区的合作健康研究)-年龄研究。我们使用了出生在1937-1943年的2008年基线样本和出生在1944-1950年的2015年富集样本。使用虚弱指数(FI)将健康状况评估为累积的健康缺陷数量。根据关键发育年龄(妊娠和生命的前2年)和ERFC期的同时发生来定义队列。队列,使用广义线性模型分析年龄和性别对老年健康状况的影响.我们包括590(53%男性)战前和战争(PWW),475名(51%男性)ERFC和171名货币改革后(PCR)队列参与者(46%男性)。针对协变量进行了调整,与PWW组群相比,ERFC(比率1.14,CL[1.06,1.23])的FI水平显著较高,但PCR(比率1.06,CL[0.94,1.20])不显著较高。在ERFC期间处于关键发育年龄会增加65-71岁成年人的FI水平。协变量没有解释这些影响,提示在ERFC期间处于关键发育年龄对老年人健康有直接有害影响。在PCR队列中未检测到德国发病率的这种增加。
    Morbidity trends may result from cohort experiences in critical developmental age. Our objective was to compare the health status of 65-71 year-olds who were in critical developmental age before (1937-June 1945), during (June 1945-June 1948) and after (June 1948-1950) the early reconstruction and food crisis (ERFC) period in Germany following World War II. Data originate from the KORA (Cooperative Health Research in the Region of Augsburg)-Age study in Southern Germany. We used the 2008 baseline sample born 1937-1943 and the 2015 enrichment sample born 1944-1950. Health status was assessed as the number of accumulated health deficits using a Frailty Index (FI). Cohorts were defined based on co-occurrence of critical developmental age (gestation and the first 2 years of life) and the ERFC period. Cohort, age and sex effects on older-age health status were analyzed using generalized linear models. We included 590 (53% male) pre-war and war (PWW), 475 (51% male) ERFC and 171 post-currency reform (PCR) cohort participants (46% male). Adjusted for covariates, FI levels were significantly higher for the ERFC (Ratio 1.14, CL [1.06, 1.23]) but not for the PCR (Ratio 1.06, CL [0.94, 1.20]) as compared to the PWW cohort. Being in critical developmental age during the ERFC period increased FI levels in adults aged 65-71 years. Covariates did not explain these effects, suggesting a direct detrimental effect from being in critical developmental age during the ERFC period on older-age health. This expansion of morbidity in Germany was not detected in the PCR cohort.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号