Weight Reduction Programs

减重计划
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:研究对性别敏感的社区减肥计划如何用于解决男性超重和肥胖问题,并确定从这个快速发展的领域可以学到什么。
    方法:在系统评价的首选报告项目和Meta分析扩展后进行范围审查,用于报告范围审查清单。
    方法:使用EBSCOhost(学术搜索完整,CINAHL完成,全球卫生,健康来源:消费者版,健康来源:护理学/学术版和MedlineComplete),Google,谷歌学者,开放存取论文和论文平台和Scopus。
    方法:所有的减肥计划都采用对性别敏感的方法来解决男性在社区环境中的超重和肥胖问题。
    方法:根据研究问题和目标进行叙事综合。主要结果包括运营化,对性别问题有敏感认识的方法的背景和概念。两名审阅者审阅了信息并将其提取到MicrosoftExcel中。
    结果:共40项研究(28项定量,从4617条记录中确定了8种混合方法和4种定性方法)。在包括职业体育俱乐部在内的一系列环境和背景下采取了对性别问题有敏感认识的方法(n=21),非职业体育俱乐部(n=16),基于工作场所的(n=2)和基于商业组织的(n=1)。最常见的分析方法是评估项目的效果(n=31),主要表现出积极的影响(例如,3个月随访时体重减轻3.9公斤)。方案(即,训练中的足球迷)具有短期成本效益(例如,在12个月的随访中,每减少5%体重,费用为862-2228英镑)。定性证据强调了影响男性参与的因素(例如,友情),并确定需要改进的地方。
    结论:研究结果表明,对性别敏感的男性减肥计划已在一系列不同的情况下得到有效应用。需要进一步的证据来证实这些方案在不同男性群体中的有效性。
    OBJECTIVE: To examine how gender-sensitive community weight-loss programmes have been used to address overweight and obesity in men and to identify what can be learnt from this rapidly evolving field.
    METHODS: Scoping review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping review checklist for reporting.
    METHODS: A database search was conducted using EBSCOhost (Academic Search Complete, CINAHL Complete, Global Health, Health Source: Consumer Edition, Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition and Medline Complete), Google, Google Scholar, Open Access Theses and Dissertations platform and Scopus.
    METHODS: All weight-loss programmes using a gender-sensitive approach to address men\'s overweight and obesity in community settings.
    METHODS: Narrative synthesis was conducted based on the research questions and objectives. Primary outcomes include operationalisation, context and concept of the gender-sensitive approach. Information was reviewed and extracted to Microsoft Excel by two reviewers.
    RESULTS: A total of 40 studies (28 quantitative, eight mixed methods and four qualitative) were identified from 4617 records. Gender-sensitive approaches were undertaken in a range of settings and contexts including professional sports clubs (n=21), non-professional sporting clubs (n=16), workplace-based (n=2) and commercial organisation-based (n=1). The most common analysis approaches were evaluating the effect of the programmes (n=31) where positive impact was predominantly shown (eg, up to 3.9 kg weight reduction at 3-month follow-up). Programmes (ie, Football Fans in Training) were short-term cost-effective (eg, the cost was £862-£2228 per 5% weight reduction at 12-month follow-up). Qualitative evidence highlights factors that influenced men\'s participation (eg, camaraderie) and identifies areas for improvement.
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings demonstrate that gender-sensitive programmes for men\'s weight loss have been effectively applied using a range of different approaches and in a range of different contexts. Further evidence is needed to confirm the effectiveness of the programmes across diverse groups of men.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    体重指数(BMI)在年龄和性别的第95个百分位数或以上在年轻人中很常见,近几十年来,其患病率有所增加。
    研究在高BMI儿童和青少年的医疗保健环境中启动的体重管理干预措施的益处和危害。
    MEDLINEviaOvid,PsycINFO通过Ovid,和Cochrane中央控制试验登记处至2023年1月12日;持续监测至2024年1月26日。
    体重管理干预措施的英文研究(行为和药理学,包括利拉鲁肽,塞马鲁肽,奥利司他,和苯丁胺/托吡酯)在2至18岁高BMI的儿童中(例如,年龄和性别≥85或≥95百分位数)在医疗机构中进行或招募。
    一名调查人员提取了数据;另一名调查人员检查了准确性。使用随机效应模型汇集具有足够证据的荟萃分析结果。
    BMI和其他与体重相关的结果,心脏代谢测量,生活质量,身体活动,膳食模式评分,和伤害。
    纳入58项随机临床试验(RCT)(N=10143)。行为干预与6至12个月后BMI和其他体重结果的小幅降低相关(28项RCT[n=4494];组间变化的平均差异,-0.7[95%CI,-1.0至-0.3])。在接触时间较高的干预措施中可以看到更大的效果,并且提供了体育锻炼。除BMI外,其他结果的报告很少,很少有重大发现。塞马鲁肽和苯丁胺/托吡酯对BMI的影响最大(例如,1司马鲁肽的RCT[n=201];平均差,-6.0[95%CI,-7.3至-4.6])。很少有评估停药后结果的研究显示体重立即恢复。利拉鲁肽常见胃肠道不良反应,塞马鲁肽,还有奥利司他.严重的不良反应很少见,但没有一项研究的随访时间超过17个月.
    在短期内,体重管理干预导致儿童和青少年的BMI降低,没有严重伤害的证据.缺乏关于体重管理干预措施如何影响超过1年和停药后的BMI以及对其他结局的长期影响的证据。
    UNASSIGNED: Body mass index (BMI) of the 95th or greater percentile for age and sex is common among young people, and its prevalence has increased in recent decades.
    UNASSIGNED: To examine the benefits and harms of weight management interventions initiated in health care settings among children and adolescents with high BMI.
    UNASSIGNED: MEDLINE via Ovid, PsycINFO via Ovid, and the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials through January 12, 2023; ongoing surveillance through January 26, 2024.
    UNASSIGNED: English-language studies of weight management interventions (behavioral and pharmacologic, including liraglutide, semaglutide, orlistat, and phentermine/topiramate) among children aged 2 to 18 years with high BMI (eg, ≥85th or ≥95th percentile for age and sex) conducted in or recruited from health care settings.
    UNASSIGNED: One investigator abstracted data; a second checked for accuracy. Outcomes with sufficient evidence for meta-analysis were pooled using random-effects models.
    UNASSIGNED: BMI and other weight-related outcomes, cardiometabolic measures, quality of life, physical activity, dietary pattern scores, and harms.
    UNASSIGNED: Fifty-eight randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included (N = 10 143). Behavioral interventions were associated with small reductions in BMI and other weight outcomes after 6 to 12 months (28 RCTs [n = 4494]; mean difference in change between groups, -0.7 [95% CI, -1.0 to -0.3]). Larger effects were seen in interventions with higher contact hours and that offered physical activity sessions. Reporting was sparse for outcomes other than BMI, with few significant findings. Semaglutide and phentermine/topiramate had the largest effects on BMI (eg, 1 RCT [n = 201] for semaglutide; mean difference, -6.0 [95% CI, -7.3 to -4.6]). The very few studies that evaluated outcomes after medication discontinuation showed immediate weight regain. Gastrointestinal adverse effects were common with liraglutide, semaglutide, and orlistat. Serious adverse effects were rare, but no studies had follow-up longer than 17 months.
    UNASSIGNED: In the short term, weight management interventions led to lower BMI in children and adolescents, with no evidence of serious harm. Evidence is lacking about how weight management interventions affect BMI beyond 1 year and after medication discontinuation and about longer-term effects on other outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    患有脊髓损伤(SCI)的人比没有SCI的人患肥胖症和相关合并症的风险更大。本系统评价的目的是检查体重管理干预措施对SCI患者的有效性,并综合参与SCI体重管理的人的经验(例如,SCI医疗保健专业人员和护理人员)。搜索了五个数据库(截至2023年7月31日),确定了5,491篇潜在合格文章。筛选后,包括22篇文章,包括562名成年人。在研究设计和减肥干预中存在相当大的异质性,包括行为营养和运动教育课程,回忆食物日记,运动干预,和药物。合并体重数据的平均百分比变化等于-4.0±2.3%,范围为-0.5至-7.6%。此外,完成减肥干预的SCI患者中有38%(N=262)的体重减轻≥5%。总的来说,尽管平均而言,所包括的干预措施导致了适度的体重减轻,超过1/3的个体实现了有临床意义的5%的体重减轻,这一发现表明,针对该人群的可用干预措施可能需要改进.
    People with spinal cord injury (SCI) are at greater risk of developing obesity and related co-morbidities than those without SCI. The objectives of this systematic review were to examine the effectiveness of weight management interventions for people with SCI and to synthesize the experiences of people involved with SCI weight management (e.g., SCI healthcare professionals and caregivers). Five databases were searched (up to July 31, 2023) and 5,491 potentially eligible articles were identified. Following screening, 22 articles were included, comprising 562 adults. There was considerable heterogeneity in study design and weight loss interventions included behavioral nutritional and exercise education sessions, recalling food diaries, exercise interventions, and pharmaceuticals. The mean percentage change of the pooled body mass data equated to -4.0 ± 2.3%, with a range from -0.5 to -7.6%. In addition, 38% of the individuals with SCI who completed a weight loss intervention (N = 262) had a ≥5% reduction in body weight. Collectively, although on average the included interventions led to moderate weight loss, the finding that just over a third of individuals achieved clinically meaningful 5% weight loss suggests that available interventions for this population may need to be improved.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    坚持是实现减肥干预最佳效益的关键。尽管对促进依从性的因素进行了大量研究,他们的研究结果表明证据不一致且支离破碎.这项研究的目的是回顾遵守减肥干预措施的现有因素,并找到有助于设计有效干预计划的因素。搜索了六个数据库以进行这项总括审查;在筛选过程之后,包括21项研究。在六组中共确定了47个与依从性相关的因素:(i)社会人口统计学(n=7),(ii)身体活动(n=2),(iii)饮食(n=8),(Iv)行为(n=4),(v)药理学(n=3),和(六)多干预(n=23)。此外,创建了依从性因子图.主要发现是,就人口因素而言,鼓励根据特定人群的特点制定个性化干预策略。此外,自我监控已被证明是有效的行为,饮食,和多种干预措施,虽然技术在饮食方面显示出潜力,行为,和多种干预措施。此外,多干预是促进坚持的战略,尽管对药物干预的依从性需要更多的证据。总的来说,研究人员和从业人员可以控制和修改因子图,以提高对减肥干预措施的依从性。
    Adherence is key for achieving the optimal benefits from a weight loss intervention. Despite the number of studies on factors that promote adherence, their findings suggest inconsistent and fragmented evidence. The aim of this study was to review the existing factors of adherence to weight loss interventions and to find factors that facilitate the design of effective intervention programs. Six databases were searched for this umbrella review; after the screening process, 21 studies were included. A total of 47 factors were identified in six groups as relevant for adherence: (i) sociodemographic (n = 7), (ii) physical activity (n = 2), (iii) dietary (n = 8), (iv) behavioral (n = 4), (v) pharmacological (n = 3), and (vi) multi-intervention (n = 23). In addition, a map of adherence factors was created. The main findings are that with respect to demographic factors, the development of personalized intervention strategies based on the characteristics of specific populations is encouraged. Moreover, self-monitoring has been shown to be effective in behavioral, dietary, and multi-interventions, while technology has shown potential in dietary, behavioral, and multi-interventions. In addition, multi-interventions are adherence-promoting strategies, although more evidence is required on adherence to pharmacological interventions. Overall, the factor map can be controlled and modified by researchers and practitioners to improve adherence to weight loss interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    需要整个医疗保健领域的协作方法来解决肥胖问题,但在牙科环境中的干预并未得到广泛实施。在这里,我们系统地综合了公众和牙科团队关于在牙科环境中提供体重管理干预措施的观点,并确定了实施的潜在障碍。完成了从成立到2023年4月3日的五个数据库的系统审查。使用定量数据和定性数据的主题分析进行比例荟萃分析。共筛选了7851项研究,其中33项纳入了审查。牙科环境中身高和体重筛查的患病率不同(4%-87%),平均29%进行筛查(p=<0.01;95%CI:14%-46%)。相当比例的公众支持牙科环境中的体重筛查(83%;p=<0.01;95%CI:76%-88%)。提供体重筛查和/或干预的重要障碍包括害怕冒犯患者(57%;95%CI:45%-68%)和缺乏时间(48%;95%CI:30%-66%)。定性数据显示了进一步的障碍,包括对超重/肥胖人群的牙科团队的污名化观点。体重讨论的支持者包括将体重与口腔健康相关联。总的来说,虽然发现了一些障碍,体重管理干预措施有可能在牙科环境中更常规地使用.
    Collaborative approaches across healthcare to address obesity are needed but intervention in dental settings is not widely implemented. Here we systematically synthesized the views of both the public and dental teams about delivering weight management interventions in dental settings and identified potential barriers to implementation. A systematic review of five databases from inception to April 3, 2023 was completed. Proportional meta-analyses were performed with quantitative data and thematic analysis of qualitative data. A total of 7851 studies were screened and 33 included in the review. The prevalence of height and weight screening in dental settings varied (4%-87%) with an average of 29% undertaking screening (p = <0.01; 95% CI: 14%-46%). A significant proportion of the public were supportive of weight screening in dental settings (83%; p = <0.01; 95% CI:76%-88%). Significant barriers to providing weight screening and/or intervention included fear of offending patients (57%; 95% CI: 45%-68%) and a lack of time (48%; 95% CI: 30%-66%). Qualitative data revealed further barriers including stigmatizing views of dental teams toward people living with overweight/obesity. Enablers of weight discussion included associating weight with oral health. Overall, whilst some barriers were identified, there is potential for weight management interventions to be used more routinely in dental settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:肥胖和2型糖尿病的患病率在某些种族的患者中可能更高,然而,这些群体对当前支持的吸收和坚持程度较低,导致高收入国家的健康不平等加剧。
    目的:本研究的主要目的是了解观点,感知,以及在高收入国家的少数族裔群体中接受和遵守体重管理和2型糖尿病计划的经验,障碍和促进者。
    方法:CINAHL,MEDLINE,PsycINFO,Scopus,学术搜索完成,和PubMed被搜索到居住在高收入国家的社区居住的成年人中进行的英语语言研究,他们来自学习国家内的少数民族。
    结果:使用JBI信息评估和审查统一管理系统综合了17项研究。从这些研究中,检索到115个发现,并确定了七个关键主题:(1)家庭健康状况和计划教育,(2)社会支持,(3)挑战,(4)文化信仰,(5)提高认识和饮食变化,(6)心理评估的影响,(7)对未来的考虑。
    结论:高收入国家2型糖尿病和体重管理计划的营养考虑应包括社会,习惯性的,经济,和概念组件,其中应包括考虑当地的种族和文化规范,并建立社区关系,同时创建文化定制的计划。
    BACKGROUND: Prevalence of both obesity and type 2 diabetes can be higher in patients from certain ethnic groups, yet uptake and adherence to current support within these groups is lower, leading to widening health inequalities in high-income countries.
    OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study is to understand the views, perceptions, and experiences of and barriers and facilitators in relation to the uptake and adherence to weight management and type 2 diabetes programs in minoritized ethnic groups in high-income countries.
    METHODS: CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, Academic Search Complete, and PubMed were searched for English language studies undertaken in community-dwelling adults residing in high-income countries, who are from a minoritized ethnic group within the country of study.
    RESULTS: Seventeen studies were synthesized using the JBI System for the Unified Management of the Assessment and Review of Information. From these studies, 115 findings were retrieved, and seven key themes were identified: (1) family health status and program education, (2) social support, (3) challenges, (4) cultural beliefs, (5) increased awareness and dietary changes, (6) impact of psychological evaluations, and (7) considerations for future.
    CONCLUSIONS: Nutritional considerations for type 2 diabetes mellitus and weight management programs in high-income countries should include social, habitual, economic, and conceptual components, which should include consideration of local ethnic and cultural norms and building community relationships while creating culturally tailored programs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:这项研究的目的是检查哪些干预措施导致肢体残疾患者的临床显着的体重减轻。
    方法:我们系统地搜索了三个电子数据库(PubMed,Scopus,和CENTRAL),包括直到2022年5月的研究,以寻找有关肢体残疾人的行为干预和体重相关结局的随机对照试验。药物或手术干预被排除。使用Cochrane偏差风险工具评估研究质量。干预措施分为饮食,身体活动,教育/辅导,或多组分。平均体重变化,标准偏差,置信区间,并提取或计算效果大小以评估干预效果。
    结果:定性综合纳入了60项研究,涉及6,511名参与者。大多数研究(n=32)包括多成分干预措施,结合饮食和身体活动成分。有限的证据表明,广泛的饮食干预或长期的多组分干预可能导致轻度至中度活动障碍的老年人(年龄>50岁)的临床相关体重减轻至少5%。
    结论:由于研究异质性高,研究质量低,可以认为研究结果的适用性范围值得怀疑。进一步的研究应该检查年轻的年龄组(即,孩子们,青少年,和40岁以下的成年人),并比较不同的环境,如学校,诊所,疗养院,和辅助生活设施。
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to examine which interventions lead to clinically significant weight loss among people with physical disabilities.
    METHODS: We systematically searched three electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and CENTRAL) including studies until May 2022 to find randomized controlled trials on behavioral interventions and weight-related outcomes in people with physical disabilities. Pharmacological or surgical interventions were excluded. Study quality was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Interventions were grouped as dietary, physical activity, education/coaching, or multi-component. Mean weight changes, standard deviations, confidence intervals, and effect sizes were extracted or calculated for assessment of the intervention effect.
    RESULTS: Sixty studies involving 6,511 participants were included in the qualitative synthesis. Most studies (n = 32) included multi-component interventions, incorporating dietary and physical activity components. Limited evidence suggests that extensive dietary interventions or long-term multi-component interventions might lead to a clinically relevant weight reduction of at least 5% for older individuals (age > 50) with mild-to-moderate mobility impairments.
    CONCLUSIONS: Due to the high heterogeneity of studies and low study quality, it can be assumed that the range of applicability of the findings is questionable. Further research should examine younger age groups (i.e., children, adolescents, and adults under 40 years) and compare different settings such as schools, clinics, nursing homes, and assisted living facilities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析研究了基于社会支持的减肥干预措施在超重或肥胖成人人群中的有效性。
    方法:我们对随机对照试验进行了系统评价,这些试验报道了包含社会联系因素的减肥干预措施的有效性。为此,我们对MEDLINE进行了严格的数据库搜索,Embase,PsycINFO,CINAHL,科克伦,和PubMed相关文章。通过CochraneRisk-of-Bias2工具评估合格试验的质量。在2-4个月的评估中,对体重减轻方面的干预效果进行了五项荟萃分析,6个月评估,结束干预,3个月和6个月的随访。
    结果:在4919名BMI≥25的成年人中,有24项涉及夫妇或同龄人的减肥试验符合纳入标准。荟萃分析在2-4个月或6个月的评估中没有发现基于社会支持的减肥干预措施的显着效果。有,然而,干预结束时[95%CI0.39,p=0.04]和3个月[95%CI0.63,p<0.01]和6个月[95%CI0.34,p=0.05]随访时的显著效果。
    结论:在干预结束和随访3个月和6个月时,似乎有显著的效果。然而,在得出任何明确的结论之前,还需要进一步的高质量研究。
    背景:PROSPERO2020CRD42020173696。
    OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the effectiveness of social-support-based weight-loss interventions in adult populations with excess weight or obesity.
    METHODS: We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials that reported on the effectiveness of weight-loss interventions which incorporated a social connectedness component. To this end, we conducted a rigorous database search of MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane, and PubMed for relevant articles. The quality of eligible trials was evaluated by the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias2 tool. Five meta-analyses on intervention effectiveness in terms of weight loss were executed at 2-4-month assessment, 6-month assessment, end of intervention, and 3- and 6-month follow-up.
    RESULTS: Twenty-four trials involving couples or peers targeting weight loss in 4 919 adults with BMI ≥ 25 met inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses detected no significant effect of social-support-based weight-loss interventions at either 2-4 month or 6-month assessment. There were, however, significant effects at end of intervention [95% CI 0.39, p = 0.04] and at 3-month [95% CI 0.63, p < 0.01] and 6-month [95% CI 0.34, p = 0.05] follow-up.
    CONCLUSIONS: There seem to be a significant effect at the end of intervention and 3- and 6-month follow-up. However, further high-quality studies are needed before drawing any clear conclusions.
    BACKGROUND: PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020173696.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    极端肥胖是影响健康和相关健康结果的全球性健康问题。尽管极端肥胖在所有的地理环境中都很普遍,这种情况在地理上孤立的地方更常见。手术等主流减肥策略的成功,锻炼,这些社区的饮食信息仍然未知,目前尚不清楚隔离是否会促进或阻碍体重管理的治疗。
    这篇综述旨在为生活在农村的极度肥胖的成年人确定有关减肥和健康及社会影响的共同主题。远程,和区域位置。
    使用混合方法评估工具(MMAT)对2013年5月至2023年5月的同行评审出版物进行了系统的文献综述。在叙述中对顺序合成进行了主题分析和描述。早期日期不包括在内,因为初步研究表明,2010年代初全球肥胖人数激增(Wang,Y.,Beydoun,M.A.,Min,J.,Xue,H.,卡明斯基,L.A.,&Cheskin,L.J.(2020)。有超重的患病率,肥胖和中心性肥胖在美国趋于平稳?趋势,模式,差距,以及对肥胖流行的未来预测。国际流行病学杂志,49(3)、810-823)和大约在同一时间注意到用于管理极端肥胖的减肥治疗激增(Mocanu,V.,Dang,J.T.,Sun,W、桦木,D.W.,Karmali,S、&Switzer,新泽西州(2020年)。现代北美减肥手术景观的评估:当前趋势和程序选择的预测因素。肥胖手术,30,3064-3072)。
    本综述确定了13项研究,这些研究报告了与性别相关的偏远地区极端肥胖的负面趋势,文化,和不良的心理健康。个性化和社区减肥支持模式对某些人口群体可能是积极的,特别是女性,通过推广成本效益,和当地可用的传统食物选择。
    在地理上与世隔绝的地方生活极度肥胖,减肥对女性来说是个挑战,土著人民,以及识字率低的人和社会经济背景较低的人。关于减肥的一般性建议通常是不成功的;然而,通过考虑乡村行为的影响和影响的消费者参与,减肥是可以实现的。需要进一步研究以个性化护理模式来管理偏远地区的病态肥胖。
    UNASSIGNED: Extreme obesity is a global health issue impacting health and related health outcomes. Although extreme obesity is prevalent across all geographical settings, the condition is more common in geographically isolated locations. The success of mainstream weight loss strategies such as surgery, exercise, and dietary information within these communities remains unknown, and it is unclear if isolation facilitates or hinders treatment for weight management.
    UNASSIGNED: This review aimed to identify common themes around weight loss and health and social impacts for extremely obese adults living in rural, remote, and regional locations.
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic literature review of peer-reviewed publications from May 2013 to May 2023 was undertaken and appraised using the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Sequential synthesis was thematically analysed and described within a narrative account. Earlier dates were not included as initial research indicated a global surge in obesity within the early 2010s (Wang, Y., Beydoun, M. A., Min, J., Xue, H., Kaminsky, L. A., & Cheskin, L. J. (2020). Has the prevalence of overweight, obesity and central obesity levelled off in the United States? Trends, patterns, disparities, and future projections for the obesity epidemic. International Journal of Epidemiology, 49(3), 810-823) and a surge in bariatric treatments for the management of extreme obesity was noted around the same time (Mocanu, V., Dang, J. T., Sun, W., Birch, D. W., Karmali, S., & Switzer, N. J. (2020). An evaluation of the modern North American bariatric surgery landscape: current trends and predictors of procedure selection. Obesity Surgery, 30, 3064-3072).
    UNASSIGNED: This review identified 13 studies that reported negative trends in extreme obesity for isolated locations linked to gender, culture, and poor mental health. Individualised and community models of weight loss support can be positive for certain demographic groups, specifically females, through the promotion of cost-effective, and locally available traditional food choices.
    UNASSIGNED: Living with extreme obesity within geographically isolated locations and losing weight is challenging for women, Indigenous peoples, and people with low literacy and those from lower socio-economic backgrounds. Generalised advice about weight loss is often unsuccessful; however, weight loss is achievable with consumer engagement which considers the influence and impact of rurality. Further research focusing on individualised nursing models for managing morbid obesity within isolated locations is required.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是调查在规定的时间内暂停减肥计划是否可以增强体重减轻和减少磨耗。
    方法:从开始到2023年7月检索了5个数据库和2个试验注册中心。如果将计划暂停干预与连续能量限制(CER)进行比较,则纳入超重和/或肥胖成人的随机对照试验。日常护理,或最小的干预。要包括在内,减肥干预必须暂停至少1周.使用随机效应荟萃分析计算体重变化和减员风险比的平均差异。
    结果:9个干预组(N=796名参与者,77%的女性)被包括在内。汇总结果在中位26周的主动干预结束时,未发现计划暂停和CER干预之间的体重变化存在显着差异(计划暂停与CER平均值:-7.09vs.-7.0公斤;平均差:-0.09公斤;95%CI:-1.10至0.93)或在中位52周的最终随访中(计划暂停与CER平均值:-6.91vs.-6.19千克;平均差:-0.72千克;95%CI:-2.92至1.48)。在积极干预结束时(风险比:1.20,95%CI:0.82至1.75)或最终随访时(风险比:1.04,95%CI:0.89至1.22),计划暂停和CER干预之间的减员没有差异。
    结论:对于体重减轻或减磨,计划暂停始终没有比CER更有效或更低。
    The objective of this study was to investigate whether pausing a weight loss program for a defined period of time could enhance weight loss and reduce attrition.
    Five databases and two trial registries were searched from inception to July 2023. Randomized-controlled trials of adults with overweight and/or obesity were included if they compared planned-pause interventions with continuous energy restriction (CER), usual care, or a minimal intervention. To be included, the weight loss intervention must have incorporated a pause of at least 1 week. Pooled mean differences for weight change and risk ratios for attrition were calculated using random-effects meta-analyses.
    Nine intervention arms (N = 796 participants, 77% female) were included. Pooled results did not detect a significant difference in weight change between planned pauses and CER interventions at the end of the active intervention at a median 26 weeks (planned pauses vs. CER mean: -7.09 vs. -7.0 kg; mean difference: -0.09 kg; 95% CI: -1.10 to 0.93) or at final follow-up at a median 52 weeks (planned pauses vs. CER mean: -6.91 vs. -6.19 kg; mean difference: -0.72 kg; 95% CI: -2.92 to 1.48). There was no difference in attrition between planned pauses and CER interventions at the end of the active intervention (risk ratio: 1.20, 95% CI: 0.82 to 1.75) or at final follow-up (risk ratio: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.89 to 1.22).
    Planned pauses were consistently found to be no more or less effective than CER for weight loss or attrition.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号