Weight Reduction Programs

减重计划
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrine disorder in women. Many of these women are overweight or obese. A minor weight loss of 5%-10% can significantly reduce reproductive, metabolic and psychological symptoms of PCOS and is recommended as a first step in the treatment of overweight or obese women with PCOS. Many weight loss programs have been proposed, but optimal methods on how to achieve the recommend weight loss are lacking. The aim of this systematic review was to generate practical tools for health professionals to guide women with PCOS towards a sustainable healthier lifestyle. PRISMA guidelines were used to conduct the systematic review. Eleven randomized controlled trials were found eligible for inclusion. Lifestyle modification strategies consisted of a diet, physical exercise, behavioural coaching or combined interventions. Mean weight loss ranged from +0.5 to -10.6 % of the initial body weight. However, the majority of the studies reported considerable drop-out rates varying between 12% and 47%. The heterogeneity of the described interventions and the high drop-out rates impede extrapolation of these results to daily clinical care. Hence, none of the described interventions seems superior to another in achieving substantial weight loss. In conclusion, the need for obtaining a healthier weight in overweight and obese women with PCOS is now well accepted. However, achieving this goal remains a challenge for both patients and healthcare providers. More research focusing on the multidisciplinary approach of lifestyle modification advice in daily practice is needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    美国癌症协会(ACS)和美国癌症研究所(AICR)各自制定了饮食和身体活动指南,以改善癌症生存率。尽管非洲裔美国人乳腺癌幸存者(AABCS)在任何种族或族裔群体中存活率最低,关于他们坚持癌症特定生活方式建议的信息有限.该研究的目的是测量AABCS对ACS/AICR饮食建议的依从性。
    二百十AABCS参加了“前进”干预试验,一个随机的,以社区为基础,6个月的减肥研究,进行了社会人口统计学评估,饮食摄入量(通过食物频率问卷),以及基线时的相关健康因素。我们实施了ACS/AICR提出的饮食建议,并创建了成分和总依从性指数得分。使用描述性统计数据来计算符合建议的妇女比例。使用学生t检验和χ2检验通过中位依从性得分比较参与者特征。
    平均总ACS/AICR评分为12.7±2.5,共21分(中位数,13;范围,5至21)。超过90%的人适度或完全坚持限制酒精和红肉和加工肉类的消费,但是大多数人没有达到其他建议吃全谷物,豆类,水果,蔬菜,避免添加糖。总分低于中位数的女性更年轻,BMI较高,受教育年限较少,和较低的收入水平。
    本研究扩展了AABCS对癌症幸存者特定饮食指南的依从性的文献。研究结果将为该人群未来的饮食生活方式干预提供信息。
    The American Cancer Society (ACS) and the American Institute for Cancer Research (AICR) each created dietary and physical activity guidelines to improve cancer survivorship. Despite African American breast cancer survivors (AABCS) having the lowest survival rates of any racial or ethnic group, limited information exists on their adherence to cancer-specific lifestyle recommendations. The study\'s purpose was to measure adherence to ACS/AICR dietary recommendations in AABCS.
    Two hundred ten AABCS enrolled in the Moving Forward intervention trial, a randomized, community-based, 6-month weight loss study, were assessed for socio-demographics, dietary intake (via food frequency questionnaire), and related health factors at baseline. We operationalized the dietary recommendations put forth by ACS/AICR and created component and total adherence index scores. Descriptive statistics were used to calculate the proportion of women who met recommendations. Student\'s t test and χ2 tests were used to compare participant characteristics by median adherence scores.
    The mean total ACS/AICR score was 12.7 ± 2.5 out of 21 points (median, 13; range, 5 to 21). Over 90% were moderately or completely adherent to limiting alcohol and red & processed meat consumption, but the majority failed to meet the other recommendations to eat whole grains, legumes, fruits, vegetables, and avoid added sugars. Women with total scores below the median were younger, with higher BMI, had fewer years of education, and lower income levels.
    The present study extends the literature on AABCS adherence to cancer survivor-specific dietary guidelines. Findings will inform future dietary lifestyle interventions in this population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    研究研究和临床实践中的体重管理干预措施在长度上有所不同,建议,会议频率,人员和成本。很少有现实世界的项目公布了与患者相关的结果,那些发表的人使用不同的方式报告信息,使得无法比较干预措施并进一步发展证据基础。为超重和肥胖的成年人制定行为体重管理计划(BWMP)的核心结果集,将可以比较不同的BWMP,并揭示哪些干预措施对哪些人群最有效。
    专家组,由40人组成,指的是,或参加超重和肥胖成年人的BWMP,将被要求决定服务应该报告哪些结果。将采用在线Delphi流程来帮助小组达成共识,以衡量和报告哪些结果。以及为此应使用哪些定义/工具。德尔菲过程的第一阶段(三轮问卷)将侧重于结果,而第二阶段(另外三轮问卷)将侧重于定义/工具选择。
    这项研究的伦理批准已从格拉斯哥大学医学院获得,兽医和生命科学伦理委员会。关于传播成果,一份报告将提交给我们的资助机构,苏格兰政府卫生部首席科学家办公室。此外,早期发现将与英格兰公共卫生部和苏格兰卫生部分享,以及通过会议演示传达的结果,同行评审出版物和我们的机构社交媒体平台。
    Weight management interventions in research studies and in clinical practice differ in length, advice, frequency of meetings, staff and cost. Very few real-world programmes have published patient-related outcomes, and those that have published used different ways of reporting the information, making it impossible to compare interventions and further develop the evidence base. Developing a core outcome set for behavioural weight management programmes (BWMPs) for adults with overweight and obesity will allow different BWMPs to be compared and reveal which interventions work best for which members of the population.
    An expert group, comprised of 40 people who work in, refer to, or attend BWMPs for adults with overweight and obesity, will be asked to decide which outcomes services should report. An online Delphi process will be employed to help the group reach consensus as to which outcomes should be measured and reported, and which definitions/instruments should be used in order to do so. The first stage of the Delphi process (three rounds of questionnaires) will focus on outcomes while the second stage (three additional rounds of questionnaires) will focus on definition/instrument selection.
    Ethical approval for this study has been received from the University of Glasgow College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences Ethics Committee. With regard to disseminating results, a report will be submitted to our funding body, the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health Department. In addition, early findings will be shared with Public Health England and Health Scotland, and results communicated via conference presentations, peer review publication and our institutions\' social media platforms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Overweight/obesity is a common, reversible risk factor for obstructive sleep apnea severity (OSA). The purpose of this guideline is to provide evidence-based recommendations for the management of overweight/obesity in patients with OSA.
    The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was used to evaluate the literature. Clinical recommendations were formulated by a panel of pulmonary, sleep medicine, weight management, and behavioral science specialists.
    Behavioral, pharmacological, and surgical treatments promote weight loss and can reduce OSA severity, reverse common comorbidities, and improve quality of life, although published studies have methodological limitations. After considering the quality of evidence, feasibility, and acceptability of these interventions, the panel made a strong recommendation that patients with OSA who are overweight or obese be treated with comprehensive lifestyle intervention consisting of 1) a reduced-calorie diet, 2) exercise or increased physical activity, and 3) behavioral guidance. Conditional recommendations were made regarding reduced-calorie diet and exercise/increased physical activity as separate management tools. Pharmacological therapy and bariatric surgery are appropriate for selected patients who require further assistance with weight loss.
    Weight-loss interventions, especially comprehensive lifestyle interventions, are associated with improvements in OSA severity, cardiometabolic comorbidities, and quality of life. The American Thoracic Society recommends that clinicians regularly assess weight and incorporate weight management strategies that are tailored to individual patient preferences into the routine treatment of adult patients with OSA who are overweight or obese.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    We aimed to describe the current state of specialist obesity services for adults with clinically severe obesity in public hospitals in Australia, and to analyse the gap in resources based on expert consensus. We conducted two surveys to collect information about current and required specialist obesity services and resources using open-ended questionnaires. Organizational level data were sought from clinician expert representatives of specialist obesity services across Australia in 2017. Fifteen of 16 representatives of current services in New South Wales (n = 8), Queensland (n = 1), Victoria (n = 2), South Australia (n = 3), and the Australian Capital Territory (n = 1) provided data. The composition of services varied substantially between hospitals, and patient access to services and effective treatments were limited by strict entry criteria (e.g. body mass index 40 kg/m2 or higher with specific complication/s), prolonged wait times, geographical location (major cities only) and out-of-pocket costs. Of these services, 47% had a multidisciplinary team (MDT), 53% had an exercise physiologist/physiotherapist, 53% had a bariatric surgeon and 33% had pharmacotherapy resources. Key gaps included staffing components of the MDT (psychologist, exercise physiologist/physiotherapist) and access to publicly funded weight loss pharmacotherapy and bariatric surgery. There was consensus on the need for significant improvements in staff, physical infrastructure, access to services, education/training in obesity medicine and targeted research funding. Based on the small number of existing, often under-resourced specialist obesity services that are located only in a few major cities, the vast majority of Australians with clinically severe obesity cannot access the specialist evidence based treatments needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Healthy lifestyle habits have been associated with improved health outcomes and quality of life and, for some cancers, a reduced risk of recurrence and death. The NCCN Guidelines for Survivorship therefore recommend that cancer survivors be encouraged to achieve and maintain a healthy lifestyle, including attention to weight management, physical activity, and dietary habits. This section of the NCCN Guidelines focuses on recommendations regarding nutrition, weight management, and supplement use in survivors. Weight management recommendations are based on the survivor\'s body mass index and include discussions of nutritional, weight management, and physical activity principles, with referral to community resources, dietitians, and/or weight management programs as needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:产后体重滞留增加了慢性肥胖和代谢改变的风险。我们对产后营养和运动干预对体重减轻和代谢结局的影响的随机对照试验(RCTs)进行了系统评价。
    方法:从开始到1月搜索了四个电子数据库,2012.两名调查人员审查了标题和摘要,对全文进行数据抽象,并评估研究质量。
    方法:我们包括比较营养,运动或联合营养和运动干预与控制条件。13项研究符合我们的纳入标准(N=1,310名参与者)。数据被抽象为研究特征,干预组件,入学期间,和后续时间。感兴趣的结果包括体重,肥胖,心脏代谢测量(葡萄糖,脂质)和肥胖相关的炎症标志物。
    结果:九项试验将联合干预措施与标准产后护理进行了比较;三项试验评估了运动干预措施的效果,一项试验评估了仅营养干预措施.四个关于联合干预措施的高质量随机对照试验结果不一致,较大的RCT(N=450)报告组间体重无差异。四个质量相当好的RCT报告了联合干预组的体重减轻与标准护理,范围从0.17公斤到4.9公斤。仅运动干预的结果尚无定论。仅营养干预的证据不足。产后干预对代谢危险因素和炎症生物标志物的影响没有足够的证据。
    结论:联合营养和运动干预可以实现体重减轻,但由于试验数量少和研究设计的局限性,证据有限.
    BACKGROUND: Post-partum weight retention contributes to the risk of chronic obesity and metabolic alterations. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effect of post-partum nutrition and exercise interventions on weight loss and metabolic outcomes.
    METHODS: Four electronic databases were searched from inception to January, 2012. Two investigators reviewed titles and abstracts, performed data abstraction on full articles and assessed study quality.
    METHODS: We included RCTs comparing nutrition, exercise or combined nutrition and exercise interventions with a control condition. Thirteen studies met our inclusion criteria (N = 1,310 participants). Data were abstracted on study characteristics, intervention components, enrollment period, and length of follow-up. Outcomes of interest included weight, adiposity, cardio-metabolic measures (glucose, lipids) and obesity-related inflammatory markers.
    RESULTS: Nine trials compared combined interventions to standard post-partum care; three trials assessed the effect of exercise interventions, one trial evaluated a nutrition-only intervention. Four good quality RCTs on combined interventions had inconsistent findings, with the larger RCT (N = 450) reporting no difference in weight between groups. Four fair-to good quality RCTs reported greater weight loss in the combined intervention group vs. standard care, ranging from 0.17 kg to 4.9 kg. Results from exercise only interventions were inconclusive. Evidence for nutrition only interventions was insufficient. There was insufficient evidence for the effect of post-partum interventions on metabolic risk factors and inflammatory biomarkers.
    CONCLUSIONS: Combined nutrition and exercise interventions can achieve weight loss, but evidence is limited due to a small number of trials and limitations in study design.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号