BACKGROUND: Florence Nightingale was the first person to recognize the link between the built environment and patient ill-health. More than 160 years later, the threat of the end of the antibiotic era looms large. The antimicrobial resistance action plan focuses on antimicrobial stewardship and developing new therapeutic agents. The risk from the built environment has been ignored, with wastewater systems identified as major sources of antimicrobial resistance within healthcare facilities. England is undertaking the largest healthcare construction programme globally. These facilities will be operating when antimicrobial resistance is predicted to be at its fiercest. Water-free patient care is a strategy for limiting dispersal of antimicrobial resistance, and preventing patient infections that need further evaluation in new hospitals.
METHODS: A narrative review was undertaken using the terms: waterless/water-free units; waterless/water-free care; sink reduction; sink removal; and washing without water. PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects were searched from January 2000 to February 2024 for reviews and original articles. Unit type, geographical location, reasons for a waterless/water-free approach, and outcomes were recorded.
RESULTS: Seven papers were identified. Four involved adult intensive care units (ICUs), one involved a care of the elderly setting, and two involved neonatal ICUs. In five papers, the aim of intervention was to reduce Gram-negative infections/colonizations. One paper was a systematic review of \'washing without water\' which reviewed cost-effectiveness and patient experience. All of the five papers focusing on Gram-negative bacilli reported a reduction in infections or colonizations post intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: More studies are highlighting the risks from water and wastewater to patient safety, and the value of water-free strategies in reducing infection rates.

Freshwater sports involve a wide range of practices leading to contact with soil and water that can entail exposure to agents of potential infectious diseases. The pathogens can be multiple (bacteria, parasites, viruses, fungi), and be either well-known or more unfamiliar and exotic. We conducted a literature review to describe various infections contracted following exposure to water and mud during freshwater sport activities. Out of the 1011 articles identified, 50 were finally included. Our findings encompassed bacterial infections (leptospirosis and gastrointestinal infections); parasitic infections (schistosomiasis, cercarial dermatitis); viral infections (norovirus and other gastrointestinal viruses; seaweed contamination; and fungal infections. These infections were reported in various countries worldwide among diverse freshwater sport activities, including swimming, surfing, kayaking, as well as extreme sports such as adventure races and mud runs. Water sports in freshwater can expose participants to infectious risks according to geographical location and type of sport. Because regular sport practice is beneficial for health, freshwater sports should not be avoided due to potential exposure to pathogens; that much said, certain precautions should be taken. In addition to adoption of preventive measures, participants should be informed about infectious risks and seek medical advice if symptoms appear after exposure. Current guidelines for assessment of bathing water quality do not suffice to ensure comprehensive evaluation of freshwater quality. Event organizers are called upon to pay close attention to environmental factors and meteorological events, to conduct timely sensitization campaigns, and to enforce appropriate safety measures.