Aseptic abscess (AA) syndrome is a rare inflammatory disorder often associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Cases of IBD-associated AA have been reported in Japan, India, and Canada, but rarely in China. Herein, we present the case of a Chinese patient with IBD-associated AAs and review the literature on AA with underlying IBD. We report the case of a 48-year-old male patient with multiple AAs on his left hand and lungs who was successfully treated with prednisone. He had undergone cutaneous abscess incision and drainage twice in the previous 2 years. The patient presented to our hospital with ulcerative colitis and pain in the dorsum of the left hand. Pus from his hand and blood cultures revealed sterile cutaneous abscesses. Chest computed tomography examination during hospitalization revealed a lung abscess. The AA was unresponsive to cefotiam or cefoperazone-sulbactam. The patient\'s left hand and lung conditions did not improve until prednisone was administered. The patient was followed up as an outpatient for 3 months and recovered without any clinical symptoms. We retrieved 17 cases of IBD-associated AA from the literature. None of the patients showed evidence of infection and failed antibiotic treatment, and all improved with corticosteroid use. AA may be an extra-intestinal manifestation of IBD. Effective medications include corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents. This case may increase the awareness of AA and aid in early identification.

BACKGROUND: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic disorder with a considerable negative impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), which has been recently recognized as an important treatment target. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of different biologics and small molecule therapies in achieving better patient-reported outcomes and HRQoL in patients with UC.
METHODS: We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis of the EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central databases from inception until February 1, 2024. The primary endpoint was clinical remission in the patient-reported outcome (PRO-2) score in UC patients who were treated with different biologics or small molecules during induction and maintenance phases. PRO-2 score is the sum of both stool frequency and rectal bleeding subscores. The secondary outcome was improvement of HRQoL defined as an increase in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire score of ≥16 points from baseline or any change in total score from baseline. A random effects model was used, and outcomes were reported as odds ratio with 95% confidence interval. Interventions were ranked per the SUCRA (surface under the cumulative ranking curve) score.
RESULTS: A total of 54 studies were included in the primary outcome analysis and 15 studies were included in the secondary outcome analysis. The primary analysis showed that during the induction phase all of included drugs were better than placebo in improving the PRO-2 score. Interestingly, upadacitinib was found to be superior to most medications in improving PRO-2 scores. The secondary analysis showed that guselkumab ranked first in the improvement of the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire score, followed by upadacitinib during the induction phase.
CONCLUSIONS: Upadacitinib ranked first in PRO-2 clinical remission during the induction and maintenance phases. Guselkumab, mirikizumab, tofacitinib, and upadacitinib were the only novel medications that were superior to placebo in improving HRQoL in UC, with guselkumab ranking the highest, followed by tofacitinib and upadacitinib. During maintenance of remission, tofacitinib ranked highest in improving HRQoL.
Patient-reported outcome (PRO-2) and disease impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) have been recognized as important treatment targets in ulcerative colitis. In this systematic review and network meta-analysis, we compared different biologics and small molecules in achieving these outcomes. We found that upadacitinib ranked first in PRO-2 clinical remission during induction and maintenance phases. Guselkumab, tofacitinib, and upadacitinib were the only novel medications that were superior to placebo in improving HRQoL during induction in ulcerative colitis, with guselkumab ranking the highest, followed by tofacitinib and upadacitinib. During maintenance of remission, tofacitinib ranked highest in improving HRQoL.

UNASSIGNED: Chronological age often guides the management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Frailty and sarcopenia, which are related but distinct entities that become increasingly prevalent with age, better predict nonsurgical and surgical outcomes in various chronic illnesses. We conducted a systematic review to assess the association between frailty or sarcopenia and adverse nonsurgical outcomes in adult patients with IBD.
UNASSIGNED: Through a systematic literature review of 4 online databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and CINAHL Plus), we identified 16 studies that focused on frailty or sarcopenia and nonsurgical outcomes in IBD. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to determine the quality of included studies.
UNASSIGNED: We identified 16 studies: 8 frailty-based and 8 sarcopenia-based studies (14 high-quality and 2 low-quality studies). All results were presented in a summarized narrative format. Frailty predicted all hospitalization-related outcomes (hospitalization, readmission, and length of stay) and mortality-related outcomes. The outcomes of therapeutic efficacy, need for therapy escalation, and infections had mixed results in relation to their association with frailty or sarcopenia. The data regarding sarcopenia and hospitalizations were also equivocal.
UNASSIGNED: This systematic review supports the use of frailty indices to predict hospitalization- and mortality-related outcomes in adult patients with IBD. Future research should focus on identifying and validating frailty and sarcopenia tools in IBD to better help predict adverse clinical outcomes and response to therapy.

Recent research indicates that the microbiome has a significant impact on the progression of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and that creating therapies that change its composition could positively impact the outcomes of IBD treatment. This review summarizes the results of extensive studies that examined IBD patients undergoing several therapies, including anti-TNF medication, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, probiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), and the alterations in their gut microbiota\'s composition and function. The objective was to investigate the variety and effectiveness of microbial species in order to discover new biomarkers or therapeutic targets that could improve the outcome of treatment for these patients. This research aimed to offer useful insights into personalized medicine techniques for managing IBD. Beneficial bacteria such as Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Roseburia have been consistently linked to favorable clinical outcomes, whereas pathogenic bacteria such as Escherichia coli and Clostridioides difficile are associated with worsening disease conditions. Although many studies have examined the role of gut microbiota in IBD, there is still a need for more targeted research on the connection between specific microbial communities and treatment outcomes. This study sought to address this gap by exploring the intricate relationship between the gut microbiota composition and the effectiveness of IBD medications.

BACKGROUND: The role of the environment in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is undisputed, especially in light of numerous epidemiological data showing the increasing prevalence of IBD worldwide. Although no specific environmental factors have been identified, the diet has received the most attention as a potential modifier of the onset and course of IBD and as a therapeutic intervention. The Westernization of the diet is repeatedly cited as a crucial aspect of the change in IBD prevalence, but data on the impact of diet on the course of IBD are still limited and the effectiveness of dietary interventions remains uncertain. Milk remains one of the most discussed dietary agents in IBD.
METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the literature published between January 2010 and March 2024 on three databases, Pubmed, Web of Knowledge, and Embase, to assess the impact of milk and dairy products on the risk and course of IBD, as well as patients\' dietary beliefs and practices.
RESULTS: We included 37 original studies in our review.
CONCLUSIONS: There is no clear evidence that milk and dairy products influence the incidence and course of IBD. The studies that assess this issue are characterized by great heterogeneity. Milk and dairy are among the most commonly excluded foods by patients with IBD, which may have clinical implications.

Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis (ASUC) is a severe form of ulcerative colitis relapse which requires hospitalization and intensive medical intervention to avoid colectomy. The timely recognition of patients at risk of corticosteroid failure and the early initiation of medical rescue therapy are paramount in the management of ASUC. The choice of medical rescue therapy is influenced by multiple factors, especially patient\'s prior treatment history. This decision should involve the patient and ideally a multidisciplinary team of healthcare professionals, including gastroenterologists, radiologists, surgeons and enterostomal therapists. Although several predictive models have been developed to predict corticosteroid failure in ASUC, there is no single validated tool that is universally utilized. At present, infliximab and cyclosporine are the only agents systematically evaluated and recommended for medical rescue therapy, with recent reports of off-label utilization of tofacitinib and upadacitinib in small case series. The available evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of these oral small molecules for ASUC is insufficient to provide definitive recommendations. Early decision-making to assess the response to medical rescue therapy is essential, and the decision to pursue surgery in the case of treatment failure should not be delayed.

UNASSIGNED: One complication of restorative proctocolectomy with ileo-anal pouch anastomosis is fistula formation in the pouch. Fistulas can be associated with significant morbidity and pouch failure. We conducted a systematic review with meta- analysis to try and understand the prevalence of pouch fistulas in patients with ulcerative colitis following restorative proctocolectomy.
UNASSIGNED: The Embase, Embase Classic, and PubMed databases were searched between January 1979 and April 2022. Studies were included if there were cross-sectional, case-controlled, population-based or cohort studies reporting on prevalence of pouch fistulas in ulcerative colitis. Studies had to report the number of patients with pouch fistulas using either clinical, endoscopic, or radiological diagnosis in an adult population.
UNASSIGNED: Thirty-three studies screened met the inclusion criteria. The pooled prevalence of developing at least 1 fistula was 0.05 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04-0.07). The pooled prevalence of pouch failure in patients with pouch fistula was found to be 0.24 (95% CI, 0.19-0.30). The pooled prevalence of developing a pouch fistula at 3 years, 5 years and more than 5 years was 0.04 (95% CI, 0.02-0.07), 0.05 (95% CI, 0.02-0.07), and 0.05 (95% CI, 0.02-0.10), respectively.
UNASSIGNED: This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to report the prevalence of pouch fistula. It also provides a pooled prevalence of pouch failure in these patients. These results can help to shape future guidelines, power future studies, and help counsel patients.

BACKGROUND: We recently described a cluster of symptoms known as twisted pouch syndrome that rarely affects patients with ileoanal pouches. Herein, we present a narrative review in which we describe the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of twisted pouch syndrome, with a focus on a simple classification schema.
METHODS: Diagnostic signs from endoscopic and radiological examinations, treatment, and prevention strategies are presented.
RESULTS: Patients with twisted pouch syndrome suffer from a triad of obstructive symptoms, erratic bowel habits, and pain which may be severe, debilitating visceral pain, all in the setting of a mechanical pouch abnormality. Diagnostic modalities include imaging, careful pouchoscopy, functional testing, diagnostic laparoscopy or laparotomy, and recently 3-dimensional pouchography. Classification of twisted pouch syndrome is based on the location and degree of rotation of the pouch and its mesentery. Outlet twists may result when the distal pouch rotates >90° to 360° clockwise inadvertently during anastomosis; when only the distal most pouch is twisted, it results in an iris-like deformity of the pouch outlet, or when the distal half of the pouch is twisted, a mid-pouch stenosis and an hourglass-shaped pouch may result. Inlet twists are either a full 360° (mesentery posterior), unintentional 180° (mesentery anterior), or 90° counterclockwise twists. Both inlet and outlet twists are fixed deformities and may only be reduced by disconnecting the entire pouch from the anus. If they result in twisted pouch syndrome, a redo pouch procedure or pouch excision is required to reduce the twist; 90° counterclockwise twists may undergo pouch inlet transposition. Adhesive twists result when the pouch becomes fixed in the pelvis in an abnormal configuration, such as when the efferent limb becomes twisted underneath the afferent limb secondary to an occult tip of the J leak, and may be reduced by pelvic adhesiolysis with or without pouch revision.
CONCLUSIONS: Pouches may rarely be inadvertently twisted during construction or twisted owing to adhesive disease or leaks. A high index of suspicion is needed to establish the diagnosis. We present a simple classification of twisted pouch syndrome that may aid in the prevention and recognition of these often difficult to diagnose postoperative complications.
In this article, we report a simple classification system for the mechanical pouch complication known as twisted pouch syndrome, including diagnostic signs from endoscopic and radiological examinations, treatment, and prevention strategies.

OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to ascertain whether small molecule drugs increase the risk of infection or malignancy in adult IBD patients.
METHODS: A comprehensive search of eight databases was conducted from their inception to November 2023. The risk of infections or malignancies in adult IBD patients treated with JAK inhibitors and S1P receptor modulators was compared. Fixed-effects or random-effects models were performed, and relative risk (RR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI) were calculated.
RESULTS: 27 RCTs from 14 studies were included (n = 10,623). The evidence indicates that small molecule drugs increase the risk of any infections (RR: 1.23, 95 %CI: 1.05-1.44) and herpes zoster (RR: 2.23, 95 %CI: 1.39-3.57). Specifically, UC patients on Filgotinib and Tofacitinib, and CD patients on Upadacitinib, showed elevated risks of any infections (RR: 1.27, 95 % CI: 1.04-1.56; RR: 1.42, 95 % CI: 1.16-1.75; RR: 1.57, 95 % CI: 1.11-2.22). CD patients on Upadacitinib also had a significantly higher risk of herpes zoster (RR: 2.64, 95 %CI: 1.16-5.99). No infections were associated with S1P receptor modulators, and similarly, no malignancies were linked to small molecule drugs.
CONCLUSIONS: JAK inhibitors increase the risk of any infections and herpes zoster Over a one-year follow-up period in IBD patients. Continuous monitoring of their long-term safety is necessary.

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have assessed the efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) as a therapy for ulcerative colitis (UC). However, the treatment processes and outcomes of these studies vary.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of FMT for treating UC by conducting a systematic meta-analysis.
METHODS: The inclusion criteria involved reports of adult patients with UC treated with FMT, while studies that did not report clinical outcomes or that included patients with infection were excluded. Clinical remission (CR) and endoscopic remission (ER) were the primary and secondary outcomes, respectively.
RESULTS: We included nine studies retrieved from five electronic databases. The FMT group had better CR than the control group [relative risk (RR) = 1.53; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.19-1.94; P < 0.0008]. ER was statistically significantly different between the two groups (RR = 2.80; 95%CI: 1.93-4.05; P < 0.00001). Adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: FMT demonstrates favorable performance and safety; however, well-designed randomized clinical trials are still needed before the widespread use of FMT can be recommended. Furthermore, standardizing the FMT process is urgently needed for improved safety and efficacy.