Tissue Plasminogen Activator

组织型纤溶酶原激活剂
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    接受经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)手术的患者会发生TURP综合征和TURP后出血。TURP后出血可以是手术,来自动脉或静脉窦,或者非手术,由于凝血障碍阻止凝块形成。TURP术后非手术出血可能是由于尿液中高浓度的尿激酶和组织纤溶酶原激活物(tPA)引起纤溶变化并增加出血风险。尿尿激酶和tPA可能具有局部和全身纤溶作用,可以防止手术部位局部血凝块形成。并通过渗入血流引起全身纤溶变化。另一个可能发生的TURP术后并发症是TURP综合征,由于通过前列腺静脉丛吸收低渗甘氨酸液。TURP综合征可能表现为低钠血症,心动过缓,低血压,这可能是高血压之前。在这个案例报告中,我们有1例良性前列腺增生(BPH)患者同时出现TURP综合征和TURP术后非手术出血.这些并发症在手术后一天是短暂的。尿尿激酶和tPA的局部作用通过防止凝块形成和诱导出血来解释TURP后的非手术出血。凝血研究显示纤溶变化,这可能是由尿激酶和tPA泄漏到血流中解释的。总之,TURP后的非手术出血可以通过尿液中纤维蛋白溶解剂的存在来解释,包括尿激酶和tPA。现有研究缺乏解释TURP后纤溶变化和出血风险的病理生理学。在这里,我们讨论了TURP后发生纤溶变化的可能病理生理学。应开展更多的研究工作来探索这一领域,以研究治疗和预防TURP术后出血的适当药物。我们建议在TURP后监测患者的凝血状况和电解质,因为有发生严重急性低钠血症的风险,TURP综合征,纤维蛋白溶解变化,和非手术出血。在我们的文献综述中,我们讨论了目前的临床试验测试抗纤维蛋白溶解剂的使用,氨甲环酸,局部在冲洗液中或全身通过拮抗尿激酶和tPA的纤溶活性来防止TURP后出血。
    Patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) surgery can develop TURP syndrome and post-TURP bleeding. Post-TURP bleeding can be surgical, from arteries or venous sinuses, or non-surgical, due to coagulopathy preventing clot formation. Non-surgical post-TURP bleeding may be due to high concentrations of urokinase and tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) in the urine that cause fibrinolytic changes and increase bleeding risk. Urine urokinase and tPA may have both local and systemic fibrinolytic effects that may prevent blood clot formation locally at the site of surgery, and cause fibrinolytic changes systemically through leaking into the blood stream. Another post-TURP complication that may happen is TURP syndrome, due to absorption of hypotonic glycine fluid through the prostatic venous plexus. TURP syndrome may present with hyponatremia, bradycardia, and hypotension, which may be preceded by hypertension. In this case report, we had a patient with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) who developed both TURP syndrome and non-surgical post-TURP bleeding. These complications were transient for one day after surgery. The local effect of urine urokinase and tPA explains the non-surgical bleeding after TURP by preventing clot formation and inducing bleeding. Coagulation studies showed fibrinolytic changes that may be explained by urokinase and tPA leakage into the blood stream. In conclusion, non-surgical bleeding after TURP can be explained by the presence of fibrinolytic agents in the urine, including urokinase and tPA. There is a deficiency in existing studies explaining the pathophysiology of the fibrinolytic changes and risk of bleeding after TURP. Herein, we discuss the possible pathophysiology of developing fibrinolytic changes after TURP. More research effort should be directed to explore this area to investigate the appropriate medications to treat and prevent post-TURP bleeding. We suggest monitoring patients\' coagulation profiles and electrolytes after TURP because of the risk of developing severe acute hyponatremia, TURP syndrome, fibrinolytic changes, and non-surgical bleeding. In our review of the literature, we discuss current clinical trials testing the use of an antifibrinolytic agent, Tranexamic acid, locally in the irrigation fluid or systemically to prevent post-TURP bleeding by antagonizing the fibrinolytic activity of urine urokinase and tPA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:综述二甲双胍在糖尿病患者血管新生中作用的相关文献。
    方法:2022年5月至9月进行的系统评价和荟萃分析,包括在Medline上的搜索,ScienceDirect,ProQuest,WebofScience,EBSCOhost和Cochrane图书馆数据库。包括的研究以英语发表,并且是人体研究,血管生成内皮标志物作为接受二甲双胍治疗的2型糖尿病患者的关注结果。内皮标志物,包括血管内皮生长因子,von-Willebrand-factor,纤溶酶原激活物抑制剂-1,可溶性血管粘附分子-1,细胞间粘附分子-1,可溶性内皮选择素,组织纤溶酶原激活剂,尿白蛋白排泄,血小板内皮细胞粘附分子-1和凝血酶激活的纤溶抑制剂,被评估为血管生成结果。使用ReviewManager5.4对数据进行统计分析。
    结果:在确定的413项研究中,纳入8项(1.9%);5项(62.5%)随机对照试验,2(25.0%)横截面,和1项(12.5%)队列研究,共有1199名患者。在结果中,von-Willebrandfactor(p=0.01),可溶性血管粘附分子-1(p<0.00001),细胞间粘附分子-1(p=0.0003),可溶性内皮选择素(p=0.007),和组织纤溶酶原激活剂(p<0.00001)在使用随机效应方法的二甲双胍治疗后显示出明显更低的水平。
    结论:发现二甲双胍具有改善内皮功能的额外作用。
    OBJECTIVE: To review relevant literature regarding the role of metformin in angiogenesis among diabetic patients.
    METHODS: The systematic review and meta-analysis conducted from May to September 2022, and comprised search on Medline, ScienceDirect, ProQuest, Web of Science, EBSCOhost and Cochrane Library databases. The studies included were published in the English language and were human studies having angiogenesis endothelial markers as the outcomes of interest among patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus undergoing metformin therapy. Endothelial markers, including vascular endothelial growth factor, von-Willebrand-factor, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, soluble vascular adhesion molecule- 1, intercellular adhesion molecule-1, soluble endothelialselectin, tissue plasminogen activator, urinary albumin excretion, platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 and thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor, were assessed as angiogenesis outcomes. Data was statistically analysed using Review Manager 5.4.
    RESULTS: Of the 413 studies identified, 8(1.9%) were included; 5(62.5%) randomised control trials, 2(25.0%) cross-sectional, and 1(12.5%) cohort studies, with overall 1199 patients. Among the outcomes, von-Willebrandfactor (p=0.01), soluble vascular adhesion molecule-1 (p<0.00001), intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (p=0.0003), soluble endothelial-selectin (p=0.007), and tissue plasminogen activator (p<0.00001) showed significantly lower levels after metformin treatment using the random effect methods.
    CONCLUSIONS: Metformin was found to have an additional effect of endothelial function improvement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:替奈普酶(TNK)是阿替普酶(ALT)作为急性缺血性卒中(AIS)的溶栓药物的有希望的替代品。然而,其在某些人群中的临床结局仍不清楚.本研究旨在比较不同剂量TNK在AIS患者中的疗效和安全性。
    方法:我们搜索了PubMed,Scopus,Cochrane中央控制试验登记册,和Embase用于比较至少一个剂量的TNK与另一个剂量的TNK或ALT0.90mg/kg的研究。我们进行了贝叶斯网络荟萃分析,以ALT0.90mg/kg为参考,估计所有结果的相对风险(RRs)和95%可信间隔(CrIs)。在累积排序(SUCRA)值之下,根据它们的表面对处理进行排序。
    结果:我们纳入了来自16篇出版物的11项试验,包括5423名参与者。任何剂量的TNK和ALT用于再灌注时没有显著差异,3个月改良Rankin评分(mRS)0-1(排名第一:TNK0.25mg/kg;SUCRA=0.68),mRS0-2(排名第一:TNK0.25mg/kg;SUCRA=0.86),死亡率(排名第一:TNK0.25mg/kg;SUCRA=0.82),颅内出血(ICH)(排名第一:TNK0.25mg/kg;SUCRA=0.88),症状性ICH(sICH)(排名第一:TNK0.10mg/kg;SUCRA=0.70),和实质性血肿(排名第一:TNK0.10mg/kg;SUCRA=0.68)。TNK0.40mg/kg的sICH发生率明显高于0.25mg/kg的TNK(RR=2.39,95%CrI=1.00-7.92)。在老年患者中,TNK0.25mg/kg的sICH发生率明显低于ALT0.9mg/kg(RR=3.0×10-13,95%CrI=3.4×10-40-0.07)。
    结论:TNK具有与ALT相当的疗效和安全性结果。TNK0.25mg/kg可能是AIS患者TNK的最佳剂量。
    OBJECTIVE: Tenecteplase (TNK) is a promising alternative to alteplase (ALT) as the thrombolytic agent for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, its clinical outcomes in certain populations remain unclear. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety among different doses of TNK in AIS patients.
    METHODS: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase for studies comparing at least one dose of TNK to another dose of TNK or ALT 0.90 mg/kg. We conducted Bayesian network meta-analyses to estimate the relative risks (RRs) and 95% credible intervals (CrIs) for all outcomes using ALT 0.90 mg/kg as the reference. The treatments were ranked according to their surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) values.
    RESULTS: We included 11 trials from 16 publications comprising 5423 participants. There were no significant differences between any doses of TNK and ALT for reperfusion, 3-month modified Rankin Score (mRS) 0-1 (rank 1st: TNK 0.25 mg/kg; SUCRA = 0.68), mRS 0-2 (rank 1st: TNK 0.25 mg/kg; SUCRA = 0.86), mortality (rank 1st: TNK 0.25 mg/kg; SUCRA = 0.82), intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) (rank 1st: TNK 0.25 mg/kg; SUCRA = 0.88), symptomatic ICH (sICH) (rank 1st: TNK 0.10 mg/kg; SUCRA = 0.70), and parenchymal hematoma (rank 1st: TNK 0.10 mg/kg; SUCRA = 0.68). TNK 0.40 mg/kg had a significantly higher sICH rate compared to TNK 0.25 mg/kg (RR = 2.39, 95% CrI = 1.00-7.92). Among elderly patients, TNK 0.25 mg/kg had a significantly lower rate of sICH than ALT 0.9 mg/kg (RR = 3.0 × 10-13, 95% CrI = 3.4 × 10-40-0.07).
    CONCLUSIONS: TNK has efficacy and safety outcomes comparable to those of ALT. TNK 0.25 mg/kg may be the optimal dose of TNK for patients with AIS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:脑室外引流(EVD)联合纤维蛋白溶解剂可有效降低与脑室脑出血(IVH)相关的发病率和死亡率。当使用纤维蛋白溶解剂时,这种功效主要归因于增加的引流能力和降低的EVD阻塞风险。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在确定在这种情况下溶栓的有效性。
    方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南(PROSPERO注册号:CRD4202232152)的首选报告项目进行文献综述。文章从各种来源选择,包括PubMed,跳闸数据库,LILACS,科克伦图书馆,和科学直接。考虑了使用EVD和/或纤维蛋白溶解剂进行IVH治疗的临床试验。非随机干预研究中的偏倚风险(ROB2)工具用于偏倚评估。异质性分析后使用固定效应回归模型。根据死亡率结果评估治疗效果。
    结果:共纳入来自4项研究的531名患者。与安慰剂相比,纤维蛋白溶解剂的使用显着降低了IVH死亡率。重组组织纤溶酶原激活剂(rtPA)或阿替普酶的比值比(OR)为0.54[0.36;0.82]。对于尿激酶(英国),OR为0.21[0.03;1.54],使其具有统计学意义。总OR为0.52[0.35;0.78],异质性I2为0%(表明低异质性)。
    结论:虽然EVD是治疗脑积水的常用方法,其有效性受到潜在阻塞和感染的限制。将EVD与UK或rtPA相结合显示出改善的患者预后。rtPA是一个可靠和有效的选择,而关于英国降低IVH死亡率的有效性的数据有限。
    OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of extraventricular drainage (EVD) combined with fibrinolytics in reducing morbidity and mortality rates associated with intraventricular cerebral hemorrhage (IVH).
    METHODS: A literature review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022332152). Articles were selected from various sources, including PubMed, Trip Database, LILACS, Cochrane Library, and ScienceDirect. Clinical trials focusing on IVH treatment using EVD and/or fibrinolytics were considered. The Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROB 2) tool was employed for bias assessment. A fixed-effects regression model was used following heterogeneity analysis. Treatment effectiveness was evaluated based on mortality outcomes.
    RESULTS: A total of 531 patients from four studies were included. The use of fibrinolytics significantly decreased IVH mortality compared with a placebo. The odds ratio (OR) for recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) or alteplase was 0.54 [0.36; 0.82]. For urokinase (UK), the OR was 0.21 [0.03; 1.54], rendering it statistically non-significant. The overall OR was 0.52 [0.35; 0.78], and the heterogeneity I2 was 0% (indicating low heterogeneity).
    CONCLUSIONS: While EVD alone is a common approach for managing hydrocephalus, its effectiveness is limited by potential blockages and infections. Combining EVD with UK or rtPA demonstrated improved patient outcomes. rtPA stands out as a reliable and effective option, while limited data are available regarding UK\'s effectiveness in reducing IVH mortality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)相对于静脉(IV)阿替普酶在急性轻度缺血性卒中患者中的疗效和安全性尚不充分。因此,我们旨在进行一项荟萃分析,以比较DAPT和静脉阿替普酶在急性小卒中患者中的应用.MEDLINE,Embase,和Cochrane进行了比较DAPT和静脉阿替普酶在小卒中患者中的研究。分析了90天内的功能和安全性结果。使用Rstudio4.3.1进行统计分析。亚分析仅限于非致残性轻微中风和NIHSS评分≤3。PROSPERO(CRD42023440986)。我们纳入了五项研究,共有6,340名患者,其中4050人(63.9%)获得了DAPT。所有纳入研究的随访期均为90天。mRS0-1的个体结局没有显着差异(OR1.26;95%CI0.85-1.89;p=0.25),mRS0-2(OR0.99;95%CI0.69-1.43;p=0.97),或全因死亡率(OR0.80;95%CI0.20-3.13;p=0.75)。与静脉注射阿替普酶相比,接受DAPT治疗的患者的症状性颅内出血(sICH)显着降低(OR0.11;95%CI0.003-0.36;p<0.001)。在mRS0-1和mRS0-2方面,我们发现在两个亚组分析中没有显着差异。我们发现DAPT和静脉阿替普酶在轻度缺血性卒中患者90天时的功能结局(mRS评分为0-1和0-2)或全因死亡率方面没有统计学上的显着差异。此外,DAPT与sICH的发生率明显降低相关。
    The efficacy and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) relative to intravenous (IV) alteplase in patients with acute minor ischemic stroke are insufficiently established. Therefore, we aimed to perform a meta-analysis to compare DAPT with IV alteplase in patients with acute minor stroke. MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for studies comparing DAPT with IV alteplase in patients with minor stroke. Functional and safety outcomes in 90 days were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using Rstudio 4.3.1. Subanalyses were performed restricted to non-disabling minor strokes and NIHSS score ≤ 3. PROSPERO (CRD42023440986). We included five studies with a total of 6,340 patients, of whom 4,050 (63.9%) received DAPT. The follow-up period for all included studies was 90 days. There was no significant difference for individual outcomes of mRS 0-1 (OR 1.26; 95% CI 0.85-1.89; p = 0.25), mRS 0-2 (OR 0.99; 95% CI 0.69-1.43; p = 0.97), or all-cause mortality (OR 0.80; 95% CI 0.20-3.13; p = 0.75) between groups. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) was significantly lower (OR 0.11; 95% CI 0.003-0.36; p < 0.001) in patients treated with DAPT compared with IV alteplase. In terms of mRS 0-1 and mRS 0-2, we found no significant difference in both subgroup analyses. We found no statistically significant difference between DAPT and IV alteplase regarding functional outcome (mRS scores of 0-1 and 0-2) or all-cause mortality at 90 days in patients with minor ischemic stroke. Additionally, DAPT was associated with a significantly lower rate of sICH.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管阿替普酶静脉溶栓仍然是急性缺血性卒中的主要治疗方法,替奈普酶显示出优于阿替普酶的潜在优势。动物研究表明,替奈普酶具有良好的药代动力学和药效学。此外,管理起来更容易。临床试验表明,替奈普酶并不逊色于阿替普酶,甚至在急性缺血性卒中伴有大血管闭塞的情况下可能更好。目前的证据支持替奈普酶的时间和成本优势,这表明它有可能取代阿替普酶作为溶栓治疗的主要选择,尤其是大血管闭塞患者。
    Although intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase remains the primary treatment for acute ischemic stroke, tenecteplase has shown potential advantages over alteplase. Animal studies have demonstrated the favorable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tenecteplase. Moreover, it is easier to administer. Clinical trials have demonstrated that tenecteplase is not inferior to alteplase and may even be superior in cases of acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion. Current evidence supports the time and cost benefits of tenecteplase, suggesting that it could potentially replace alteplase as the main option for thrombolytic therapy, especially in patients with large vessel occlusion.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:比较双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)和静脉(IV)组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(t-PA)治疗急性小缺血性卒中(AIS)的安全性和有效性。
    方法:遵循Cochrane和PRISMA指南,我们分析了在轻度AIS患者中比较DAPT和IVt-PA的观察性研究和临床试验.数据库包括PubMed,Scopus,和WebofScience。数据提取包括研究特征,患者人口统计学,并分析了结果。RevMan5.3和OpenMetaAnalyst2021用于分析数据并评估异质性,分别。使用RoB2.0和纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表确定偏倚风险。
    结果:该荟萃分析包括5项研究,涉及3,978名DAPT治疗患者和2,224名t-PA治疗患者。我们发现mRS评分0-1(OR1.11,95%CI:0.79,1.55,p=0.56)和0-2(OR0.90,95%CI:0.61,1.31,p=0.57)没有显着差异,以及合并mRS评分(OR1.05,95%CI:0.82,1.34,p=0.72)。同样,两个治疗组的NIHSS评分相对于基线的变化(MD0.32,95%CI:-0.35,0.98,p=0.35)和死亡率(OR0.87,95%CI:0.26,2.93,p=0.83)无显著差异.值得注意的是,与IVt-PA组相比,DAPT组出血发生率(OR0.31,95%CI:0.14,0.69,p=0.004)和症状性颅内出血发生率(sICH)显著较低(OR0.10,95%CI:0.04,0.26,p<0.00001).
    结论:我们的荟萃分析发现DAPT和IVt-PA之间的疗效没有显着差异。然而,与IVt-PA相比,DAPT显示sICH和出血的风险显着降低。
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) and Intravenous (IV) Tissue Plasminogen Activator (t-PA) in minor Acute Ischemic Stroke (AIS).
    METHODS: Following Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines, we analyzed observational studies and clinical trials comparing DAPT and IV t-PA in patients with minor AIS. Databases included PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Data extraction included study characteristics, patient demographics, and analyzed outcomes. RevMan 5.3 and OpenMetaAnalyst 2021 were used to analyze the data and assess heterogeneity, respectively. The risk of bias was determined using RoB 2.0 and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.
    RESULTS: This meta-analysis included five studies with 3,978 DAPT-treated patients and 2,224 IV t-PA-treated patients. We found no significant differences in achieving modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores of 0-1 (OR 1.11, 95 % CI: 0.79, 1.55, p = 0.56) and 0-2 (OR 0.90, 95 % CI: 0.61, 1.31, p = 0.57), as well as combined mRS scores (OR 1.05, 95 % CI: 0.82, 1.34, p = 0.72). Similarly, there were no significant disparities between the two treatment groups in NIHSS score change from baseline (MD 0.32, 95 % CI: -0.35, 0.98, p = 0.35) and in mortality rates (OR 0.87, 95 % CI: 0.26, 2.93, p = 0.83). Notably, in comparison to the IV t-PA group, the DAPT group exhibited a significantly lower incidence of bleeding (OR 0.31, 95 % CI: 0.14, 0.69, p = 0.004) and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) (OR 0.10, 95 % CI: 0.04, 0.26, p < 0.00001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis found no significant differences in efficacy between DAPT and IV t-PA. However, DAPT demonstrated a significantly lower risk of sICH and bleeding compared with IV t-PA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    目的:系统评价急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)患者静脉溶栓后出血转化(HT)的风险预测模型。
    方法:WebofScience,科克伦图书馆,PubMed,Embase,CINAHL,CNKI,CBM,万方,和VIP从开始至2023年2月25日检索与AIS溶栓后HT风险预测模型相关的文献.
    结果:总共17项纳入的研究包含26个预测模型,所有模型在建模时的AUC范围为0.662至0.9854,16个模型的AUC>0.8,表明模型具有良好的预测性能。然而,大多数纳入研究存在偏倚风险.Meta分析结果显示房颤(OR=2.72,95%CI:1.98~3.73),NIHSS评分(OR=1.09,95%CI:1.07-1.11),葡萄糖(OR=1.12,95%CI:1.06-1.18),中度至重度脑白质疏松(OR=3.47,95%CI:1.61-7.52),大脑中动脉高密度征(OR=2.35,95%CI:1.10-4.98),大面积脑梗死(OR=7.57,95%CI:2.09-27.43),早期梗死征象(OR=4.80,95%CI:1.74~13.25)是AIS患者静脉溶栓后HT的有效预测因子。
    结论:在中国人群中,AIS患者溶栓后HT的模型表现良好,但是有一些偏见的风险。未来中国人群AIS患者静脉内HT转化预测模型应关注房颤等预测因子,NIHSS得分,葡萄糖,中度至重度脑白质疏松症,大脑中动脉高密度征,大面积脑梗塞,和梗塞的早期迹象。
    To systematically review the risk prediction model of Hemorrhages Transformation (HT) after intravenous thrombolysis in patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke (AIS).
    Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, CNKI, CBM, WanFang, and VIP were searched from inception to February 25, 2023 for literature related to the risk prediction model for HT after thrombolysis in AIS.
    A total of 17 included studies contained 26 prediction models, and the AUC of all models at the time of modeling ranged from 0.662 to 0.9854, 16 models had AUC>0.8, indicating that the models had good predictive performance. However, most of the included studies were at risk of bias. the results of the Meta-analysis showed that atrial fibrillation (OR=2.72, 95% CI:1.98-3.73), NIHSS score (OR=1.09, 95% CI:1.07-1.11), glucose (OR=1.12, 95% CI:1.06-1.18), moderate to severe leukoaraiosis (OR=3.47, 95% CI:1.61-7.52), hyperdense middle cerebral artery sign (OR=2.35, 95% CI:1.10-4.98), large cerebral infarction (OR=7.57, 95% CI:2.09-27.43), and early signs of infarction (OR=4.80, 95% CI:1.74-13.25) were effective predictors of HT after intravenous thrombolysis in patients with AIS.
    The performance of the models for HT after thrombolysis in patients with AIS in the Chinese population is good, but there is some risk of bias. Future post-intravenous HT conversion prediction models for AIS patients in the Chinese population should focus on predictors such as atrial fibrillation, NIHSS score, glucose, moderate to severe leukoaraiosis, hyperdense middle cerebral artery sign, massive cerebral infarction, and early signs of infarction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    小卒中溶栓(IVT)的疗效(美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分,0-5)仍然没有定论。本研究的目的是通过对随机对照试验和观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析,比较IVT与最佳药物治疗(BMT)的有效性和安全性。
    我们搜索了PubMed,Embase,科克伦图书馆,和WebofScience数据库,以获取从开始到2023年8月10日与小卒中的IVT相关的文章。主要结果是出色的功能结果,定义为90天的改良Rankin量表评分为0或1。通过使用比值比(OR)计算总体和预先制定的亚组的关联。本研究在PROSPERO(CRD42023445856)注册。
    共20项高质量研究,由13397例急性轻微缺血性卒中患者组成,包括在内。在0至1的改良Rankin量表评分中没有观察到显着差异(OR,1.10[95%CI,0.89-1.37])和0至2(OR,1.16[95%CI,0.95-1.43]),死亡率(或,0.67[95%CI,0.39-1.15]),复发性中风(OR,0.89[95%CI,0.57-1.38]),和复发性缺血性卒中(OR,1.09[95%CI,0.68-1.73])在IVT和BMT组之间。IVT组和BMT组在早期神经功能恶化方面存在差异(OR,1.81[95%CI,1.17-2.80]),症状性颅内出血(OR,7.48[95%CI,3.55-15.76]),和出血性转化(或,4.73[95%CI,2.40-9.34])。在非致残性缺陷的亚组患者或与使用抗血小板药物的患者相比,改良的Rankin量表评分为0至1的比较保持不变。
    这些研究结果表明,IVT并未显著改善急性轻微缺血性卒中患者的功能预后。此外,与BMT相比,它与有症状的颅内出血风险增加相关.此外,在非致残性缺陷或使用抗血小板的患者中,IVT可能不具有优于BMT的优势。
    UNASSIGNED: The efficacy of thrombolysis (IVT) in minor stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, 0-5) remains inconclusive. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of IVT with best medical therapy (BMT) by means of a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies.
    UNASSIGNED: We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases to obtain articles related to IVT in minor stroke from inception until August 10, 2023. The primary outcome was an excellent functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 or 1 at 90 days. The associations were calculated for the overall and preformulated subgroups by using the odds ratios (ORs). This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023445856).
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 20 high-quality studies, comprised of 13 397 patients with acute minor ischemic stroke, were included. There were no significant differences observed in the modified Rankin Scale scores of 0 to 1 (OR, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.89-1.37]) and 0 to 2 (OR, 1.16 [95% CI, 0.95-1.43]), mortality rates (OR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.39-1.15]), recurrent stroke (OR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.57-1.38]), and recurrent ischemic stroke (OR, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.68-1.73]) between the IVT and BMT group. There were differences between the IVT group and the BMT group in terms of early neurological deterioration (OR, 1.81 [95% CI, 1.17-2.80]), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR, 7.48 [95% CI, 3.55-15.76]), and hemorrhagic transformation (OR, 4.73 [95% CI, 2.40-9.34]). Comparison of modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 1 remained unchanged in subgroup patients with nondisabling deficits or compared with those using antiplatelets.
    UNASSIGNED: These findings indicate that IVT does not yield significant improvement in the functional prognosis of patients with acute minor ischemic stroke. Additionally, it is associated with an increased risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage when compared with the BMT. Moreover, IVT may not have superiority over BMT in patients with nondisabling deficits or those using antiplatelets.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:阿替普酶是目前治疗急性缺血性卒中的标准。替奈普酶是一种较新的纤维蛋白溶解剂,具有较好的给药和较低的成本;然而,其与阿替普酶的比较效果仍不确定。我们着手进行系统评价和荟萃分析,以确定替奈普酶与阿替普酶对急性缺血性卒中的益处和危害。
    方法:我们搜索了PubMed,Embase,Cochrane中央对照试验登记册(中央),和ClinicalTrials.gov从开始到2023年4月,用于比较替奈普酶和阿替普酶治疗急性缺血性卒中的随机和非随机研究。配对的审稿人独立评估偏倚风险并提取数据。我们使用随机效应模型进行了常规荟萃分析和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析(NMA),并使用GRADE方法评估了证据的确定性。我们的主要疗效结果是3个月时的出色功能结果,定义为修改的Rankin量表上的0-1分。我们的主要安全性结果是有症状的颅内出血和全因死亡率。
    结果:36项研究符合审查条件,包括12项随机(n=5533)和24项非随机研究(n=44,956)。中度确定性证据表明,替奈普酶和阿替普酶在增加3个月时达到出色功能结局的患者比例方面没有差异(比值比[OR],1.10;95%CI0.98-1.23;风险差异[RD]2.4%,95%CI-0.5至5.2),而来自NMA的中度确定性证据表明,0.25mg/kg替奈普酶在3个月时显著改善了优异的功能结局(OR,1.16;95%可信区间1.02-1.32)。适度的确定性证据表明,与阿替普酶相比,替奈普酶可能对症状性颅内出血的患病率几乎没有差异(OR,1.12;95%CI0.79-1.59;RD0.3%,95%CI-0.5至1.4),并可能降低全因死亡率(调整后的优势比[aOR],0.44;95%CI0.30-0.64;RD-4.6%;95%CI-5.8至-2.9)。
    结论:中度确定性证据表明,替奈普酶和阿替普酶在增加3个月时达到良好功能结局的患者比例和症状性颅内出血风险方面几乎没有差异,而与阿替普酶相比,替奈普酶可能降低全因死亡率.急性缺血性卒中后给予0.25mg/kg替奈普酶提示增加在3个月时达到优异功能结果的患者比例。
    OBJECTIVE: Alteplase is the current standard of care for acute ischemic stroke. Tenecteplase is a newer fibrinolytic agent with preferable administration and lower costs; however, its comparative effectiveness to alteplase remains uncertain. We set out to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to establish the benefits and harms of tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute ischemic stroke.
    METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to April 2023 for randomized and non-randomized studies that compared tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute ischemic stroke. Paired reviewers independently assessed risk of bias and extracted data. We performed both conventional meta-analyses and Bayesian network meta-analyses (NMA) with random-effects models and used the GRADE approach to evaluate the certainty of evidence. Our primary efficacy outcome was excellent functional outcome at 3 months, defined as a score of 0-1 on the modified Rankin Scale. Our primary safety outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and all-cause mortality.
    RESULTS: Thirty-six studies were eligible for review, including 12 randomized (n = 5533) and 24 non-randomized studies (n = 44,956). Moderate certainty evidence showed that there was no difference between tenecteplase and alteplase in increasing the proportion of patients achieving excellent functional outcome at 3 months (odds ratio [OR], 1.10; 95% CI 0.98-1.23; risk difference [RD] 2.4%, 95% CI - 0.5 to 5.2), while moderate certainty evidence from NMA suggested that 0.25 mg/kg tenecteplase significantly improved excellent functional outcome at 3 months (OR, 1.16; 95% credible interval 1.02-1.32). Moderate certainty evidence showed that, compared to alteplase, tenecteplase may make little to no difference in the prevalence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR, 1.12; 95% CI 0.79-1.59; RD 0.3%, 95% CI - 0.5 to 1.4), and probably reduces all-cause mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.44; 95% CI 0.30-0.64; RD - 4.6%; 95% CI - 5.8 to - 2.9).
    CONCLUSIONS: Moderate certainty evidence suggested that there was little to no difference between tenecteplase and alteplase in increasing the proportion of patients achieving excellent functional outcome at 3 months and the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, while compared to alteplase, tenecteplase probably reduce all-cause mortality. Administration of 0.25 mg/kg tenecteplase after acute ischemic stroke is suggestive of increasing the proportion of patients that achieve excellent functional outcome at 3 months.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号