BACKGROUND: Pediatric acute ischemic stroke is a rare diagnosis that requires timely recognition and definitive management to prevent morbidity and mortality. Children often present to primary care offices, urgent care clinics, and adult emergency departments for evaluation of symptoms that may be signs and symptoms of stroke. Currently, there are no published prehospital or transport protocols specific to pediatric acute ischemic stroke. The Children\'s Mercy Hospital Critical Care Transport Team (CMCCT) created a pediatric-specific clinical practice guideline (CPG) for suspected acute ischemic stroke.
METHODS: This retrospective, descriptive study reports pediatric patients aged younger than 18 years who met criteria for the pediatric stroke CPG and required interfacility transport by CMCCT over a 4- year period. Large vessel occlusion (LVO) scores used in adults were calculated retrospectively.
RESULTS: Seventeen patients met inclusion criteria. Four (24%) of 17 had radiographic evidence of acute thrombus, 3 of whom received alteplase and/or endovascular clot retrieval. Median age of confirmed stroke was 83 months (interquartile range, 65-148) compared with 177 months for nonstroke (interquartile range, 169-191), P = 0.126. The most common presenting symptom was hemiplegia in the confirmed stroke group. The confirmed stroke group scored significantly lower on the Glasgow Coma Scale (median of 8 vs 15, P = 0.014), significantly higher on the Los Angeles Motor Scale LVO score (median 4 vs 0, P = 0.021), and significantly higher on the Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation LVO (median 4 vs 0, P = 0.036).
CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, the CMCCT CPG is the first pediatric transport protocol aimed at recognition and management of pediatric stroke described in the literature. Retrospective calculation of LVO scores show that they may be helpful in application to pediatric patients.

BACKGROUND: Mechanical Thrombectomy (MT) is standard of care for eligible patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion (LVO). With increasing use of MT, clinicians are more likely to encounter seizures, a potential complication of AIS treated with MT. Tracking future trends in the burden of post-stroke seizure associated with MT will require baseline pre-approval benchmark estimates of its frequency and outcomes.
METHODS: All patients with AIS who underwent MT (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification; ICD-9-CM procedure code: 39.74) were identified from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2006-2014, using appropriate ICD-9-CM codes. We identified a subset of patients with seizures using ICD-9-CM secondary discharge diagnoses codes 780.3x and 345.x. We computed the rate of seizures overall and across pre-specified demographic, clinical, and healthcare system-related variables. Finally, we assessed the independent association of mortality with seizures using a multivariable logistic regression model.
RESULTS: Of 30137 (weighted) patients with AIS who underwent MT, 1,363 (4.5%) had seizures. Patients who had seizures were younger, privately insured, or Medicaid beneficiaries, and frequently died in the hospital. There were no statistically significant differences between the seizures and no-seizures groups by race, sex, IV thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator, length of stay, and the number of medical comorbidities. However, patients who underwent MT and developed seizures had 75% higher odds of in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR 95% CI 1.75; 1.22-2.49).
CONCLUSIONS: In this nationwide sample, prior to the 2015 AHA/ASA guidelines update supporting MT use, seizures occurred in one of twenty patients with AIS treated with MT, and occurrence of seizure was independently associated with a nearly two-fold increase in the odds of in-hospitality death.

In critically ill (preterm) neonates, catheter-related venous thromboembolism (CVTE) can be a life-threatening complication. Evidence on optimal management in the literature is lacking. In the Netherlands, a consensus-based national management guideline was developed to create uniform CVTE management.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the national guideline.
This prospective, multicenter, observational study included all infants aged ≤6 months with CVTE in the Netherlands between 2014 and 2019. CVTE was divided into thrombosis in veins and that in the right atrium, with their own treatment algorithms. The primary outcomes were recurrent venous thrombotic events (VTEs) and/or death due to CVTE as well as major bleeding.
Overall, 115 neonates were included (62% male; 79% preterm). The estimated incidence of CVTE was 4.0 per 1000 neonatal intensive care unit admissions. Recurrent thrombosis occurred in 2 (1.7%) infants and death due to CVTE in 1 (0.9%) infant. Major bleeding developed in 9 (7.8%) infants: 2 of 7 (29%) on recombinant tissue plasminogen activator, which was given for high-risk right-atrium thrombosis, and 7 of 63 (11%) on low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). Five of the 7 bleedings because of LMWH were complications of subcutaneous catheter use for LMWH administration.
The management of neonatal CVTE according to the Dutch CVTE management guideline led to a low incidence of recurrent VTEs and death due to VTEs. Major bleeding occurred in 7.8% of the infants. Specific guideline adjustments may improve efficacy and, especially, safety of CVTE management in neonates.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous alteplase is the only thrombolytic treatment approved for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Although no randomized controlled trial (RCT) has shown the superiority of tenecteplase over alteplase in AIS, tenecteplase is increasingly used off-label in Stroke Units. The purpose of the present work was to provide an up-to-date set of expert consensus statements on the use of tenecteplase in AIS.
METHODS: Members of the working group were selected by the French Neurovascular Society. RCTs comparing tenecteplase and alteplase in the treatment of AIS were reviewed. Recent meta-analysis and real-life experience data on tenecteplase published until 30th October 2021 were also analyzed. After a description of the available data, we tried to answer the subsequent questions about the use of tenecteplase in AIS: What dosage of tenecteplase should be preferred? How effective is tenecteplase for cerebral artery recanalization? What is the clinical effectiveness of tenecteplase? What is the therapeutic safety of tenecteplase? What are the benefits associated with tenecteplase ease of use? Then expert consensus statements for tenecteplase use were submitted. In October 2021 the working group was asked to review and revise the manuscript. In November 2021, the current version of the manuscript was approved.
UNASSIGNED: A set of three expert consensus statements for the use of tenecteplase within 4.5hours of symptom onset in AIS patients were issued: (1) It is reasonable to use tenecteplase 0.25mg/kg when mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is planned. (2) Tenecteplase 0.25mg/kg can be used as an alternative to alteplase 0.9mg/kg in patients with medium- or small-vessel occlusion not retrievable with MT. (3) Tenecteplase 0.25mg/kg could be considered as an alternative to alteplase 0.9mg/kg in patients without vessel occlusion.
CONCLUSIONS: These expert consensus statements could provide a framework to guide the clinical decision-making process for the use of tenecteplase according to admission characteristics of AIS patients. However, existing data are limited, requiring inclusions in ongoing RCTs or real-life registries.

OBJECTIVE: Whether or not use of intravenous alteplase in combination with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) improves outcomes versus EVT alone, for acute stroke patients with large vessel occlusion presenting directly to a comprehensive stroke center, is uncertain.
METHODS: Six randomized trials exploring this issue were published, and we synthesized this evidence to inform a rapid guideline based on the Guidelines International Network principles and guided by the GRADE approach.
RESULTS: We enlisted an international panel that included 4 patient partners and 1 caregiver, individuals from 6 countries. The panel considered low certainty evidence that EVT alone, relative to EVT with intravenous alteplase, possibly results in a small decrease in the proportion of patients that achieve functional independence and possibly a small increase in mortality. Both effect estimates were downgraded twice due to very serious imprecision. The panel also considered moderate certainty evidence that EVT alone probably decreases symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, versus EVT with alteplase, and combination therapy was more costly than EVT alone. As a result of the low certainty for improved recovery without impairment and mortality for combination therapy versus EVT alone, and moderate certainty for increased harm with combination therapy, the panel made a weak recommendation in favor of EVT alone for stroke patients eligible for both treatments, and initially presenting directly to a comprehensive stroke center that provides both treatments.
CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with this weak recommendation, optimal patient management will likely often include co-treatment with intravenous alteplase, depending on local circumstances and patient presentation.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review available evidence and establish guidelines related to the use of thrombolytics for the management of small animals with suspected or confirmed thrombosis.
METHODS: PICO (Population, Intervention, Control, and Outcome) questions were formulated, and worksheets completed as part of a standardized and systematic literature evaluation. The population of interest included dogs and cats (considered separately) and arterial and venous thrombosis. The interventions assessed were the use of thrombolytics, compared to no thrombolytics, with or without anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents. Specific protocols for recombinant tissue plasminogen activator were also evaluated. Outcomes assessed included efficacy and safety. Relevant articles were categorized according to level of evidence, quality, and as to whether they supported, were neutral to, or opposed the PICO questions. Conclusions from the PICO worksheets were used to draft guidelines, which were subsequently refined via Delphi surveys undertaken by the Consensus on the Rational Use of Antithrombotics and Thrombolytics in Veterinary Critical Care (CURATIVE) working group.
RESULTS: Fourteen PICO questions were developed, generating 14 guidelines. The majority of the literature addressing the PICO questions in dogs is experimental studies (level of evidence 3), thus providing insufficient evidence to determine if thrombolysis improves patient-centered outcomes. In cats, literature was more limited and often neutral to the PICO questions, precluding strong evidence-based recommendations for thrombolytic use. Rather, for both species, suggestions are made regarding considerations for when thrombolytic drugs may be considered, the combination of thrombolytics with anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs, and the choice of thrombolytic agent.
CONCLUSIONS: Substantial additional research is needed to address the role of thrombolytics for the treatment of arterial and venous thrombosis in dogs and cats. Clinical trials with patient-centered outcomes will be most valuable for addressing knowledge gaps in the field.

BACKGROUND: In 2015, endovascular therapy (EVT) for large vessel occlusions became standard of care for acute ischemic stroke. Lower utilization of IV alteplase has been reported in women, but whether sex differences in EVT use in the United States exists has not been established.
METHODS: We identified all acute ischemic stroke discharges from Get With The Guidelines-Stroke hospitals between 2012 and 2019 who were potentially eligible for EVT, based on National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≥6 and arrival <6 hours, according to 2018 American Heart Association/ASA guidelines. Multivariable regression analyses were used to determine the association between sex and EVT utilization, and outcomes (including mortality, discharge home, functional status) after EVT. Separate analyses were conducted for the 2 time periods: 2012 to 2014, and 2015 to 2019.
RESULTS: Of 302 965 patients potentially eligible for EVT, 42 422 (14%) received EVT. Before 2015, EVT treatment rates were 5.3% in women and 6.6% in men. From 2015 to 2019, treatment rates increased in both sexes to 16.7% in women and 18.5% in men. The adjusted odds ratio for EVT in women compared with men was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.87-0.99) before 2015, and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.96-1.01) after 2015. There were no significant sex differences in outcomes except that after 2015, women were less able to ambulate at discharge (adjusted odds ratio, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.95-0.99]) and had lower in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.88-0.99]).
CONCLUSIONS: EVT utilization has increased dramatically in both women and men since EVT approval in 2015. Following statistical adjustment, women were less likely to receive EVT initially, but after 2015, women were as likely as men to receive EVT. After EVT, women were more likely to be disabled at discharge but less likely to experience in-hospital death compared with men.

暂无摘要。

This was an investigation of the differential effects of early intensive versus guideline-recommended blood pressure (BP) lowering between lacunar and non-lacunar acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) in the BP arm of the Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study (ENCHANTED).
In 1,632 participants classified as having definite or probable lacunar (n = 454 [27.8%]) or non-lacunar AIS according to pre-specified definitions based upon clinical and adjudicated imaging findings, mean BP changes over days 0-7 were plotted, and systolic BP differences by treatment between subgroups were estimated in generalized linear models. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the BP treatment effects on 90-day outcomes (primary, an ordinal shift of modified Rankin scale scores) across lacunar and non-lacunar AIS after adjustment for baseline covariables.
Most baseline characteristics, acute BP and other management differed between lacunar and non-lacunar AIS, but mean systolic BP differences by treatment were comparable at each time point (all pinteraction  > 0.12) and over 24 h post-randomization (-5.5, 95% CI -6.5, -4.4 mmHg in lacunar AIS vs. -5.6, 95% CI -6.3, -4.8 mmHg in non-lacunar AIS, pinteraction  = 0.93). The neutral effect of intensive BP lowering on functional outcome and the beneficial effect on intracranial haemorrhage were similar for the two subgroups (all pinteraction  > 0.19).
There were no differences in the treatment effect of early intensive versus guideline-recommended BP lowering across lacunar and non-lacunar AIS.

Immediate ischemic stroke treatment improves outcomes and early alteplase administration is recommended for patients within window. We implemented stroke guidelines through a neuro-resuscitation initiative (NRI) and hypothesized that the intervention would decrease times to assessment and treatment.
We analyzed quality assurance data for EMS and triage patients arriving to our academic emergency department with suspected ischemic stroke to compare outcomes 12 months before to 6 months after initiative implementation at an academic certified primary stroke center in the U.S. Southwest. We examined four time-based outcomes: neurology at bedside, CT head without contrast, CT head angiogram, and alteplase administration. We summarized times with median and IQR values and compared pre and post times to event (in minutes) with Wilcoxon rank sum tests and Kaplan-Meier survival curves.
We identified 203 EMS (83 pre, 120 post) and 66 (11 pre, 55 post) triage Stroke Alert patients. We observed decreased times for all outcomes in both the EMS and triage samples; however, only those in the EMS sample were significant. In the EMS sample, neurology at bedside median times decreased from 20 min to 2 min (p < 0.001); median minutes to CT head without contrast decreased from 16 min to 9 min (p < 0.001); median minutes to CT head angiogram decreased from 71 min to 21 min (p = 0.007); and, median minutes to alteplase decreased from 72 min to 49.5 min (p = 0.04).
An academic ED led stroke care initiative streamlined evaluation and care with significantly shortened times to all four events.